news on our website tvar.by, last evening and evenings tomorrow. sharko, nikolai filippovich, commander of the rifle company of the 244th guards rifle regiment, guard captain. in the red army since july 1942, a participant in the great patriotic war, fought on the third ukrainian and first belarusian fronts. rifle company commander, guard captain.

nikolai sharko particularly distinguished himself during the vistula-odor offensive operation in january 1945. when breaking through the enemy defense , he raised a unit loyal to him to attack, after which roto, under the command of charko captured two enemy trenches, capturing more than fifty machine guns as trophies , and captured 14 nazis. on january 16 , 1945, during the liberation of a polish settlement, charcot's rifle company destroyed an enemy landing force. in the battles for the capture of berlin by the guard, the captain was seriously wounded, as a result of which he lost his leg. by decree of the presidium of the supreme soviet of the ussr, for exemplary command on the front of the fight against the nazi invaders, the guard to captain charcot.

exports of scientific and technical products and developments in the twenty-third year amounted to almost 56 million,

the energy sector of our domestic market paid close attention to them. the fuel is not the cheapest, but it has many advantages. an electronic portal about ghetto prisoners will appear in belarus. a memorandum on the implementation of the project was signed in minsk. information about concentration camp prisoners who were located both on the territory of belarus and in other countries will be presented on the prisonerbay website. news, analytics, expert comments and interesting facts. see the events program. on thursdays. on the tv channel belarus 24 secrets of good morning and good mood, good morning belarus on the tv channel belarus 24, program good morning belarus, my name is svetlana barovskaya, how pretty you are, and you can pet them, oh, what flowering trees, these are cherries, a new athlete is probably sneaking up on you, getting to know amazing people, anatoly leonidovich, hello guys, hello, let's continue. and a lot of

useful and interesting information, it was installed precisely in memory of the tank crews who gave their lives in july of the forty -first year, one might say, which became a shield and with a sword here during a tank battle, a brass band is a very difficult genre, it’s not amazing that you hold this orchestra, someone leaves, comes, so...

information and analytical project, a current microphone on the air. radio tv channel belarus24 with you presenter andrei sych, as well as our guests political scientist pyotr petrovsky and director of the world representative office in belarus, olga shpilevskaya, hello, good afternoon. we are discussing the current agenda, which literally runs as a red line in discussions among belarusians and around the world, on kitchens in political science classrooms. colleagues, i would like to start with an event that we all attended yesterday from the other side. you observe the president’s agenda, now he is already at another enterprise, we will now, it would seem, discuss yesterday, how eventful it was, and what theses were voiced at this event, and there is already a new event with a new agenda, to a certain extent, at in my opinion, this characterizes the entire activity of the state apparatus on the territory

of the republic of belarus, which, well, to the maximum mobilized and is working quite clearly and firmly on the agenda that currently arises, on the challenges that our country faces, but still olga alexandrovna, in your opinion, this is what yesterday was remembered for, what theses of the president you noted for yourself ? well, in general , yesterday we really had such a very important, significant and unusual conversation, unusual, why? because yes, we are watching the agenda of the head of state, we see that this is a person who delves into all areas that can be, you know, there are presidents who, conditionally, look at what they know best, yes, everything else is somehow possible somewhere.

1.0 journalists, yes, and if the big conversation that takes place with the head of state, as a rule, these are journalists from the republican media, partly the editors of regional newspapers and also invited journalists, then here is an absolutely belarusian agenda, it would be absolutely more to say that a special the emphasis was placed precisely on the regional press, the toughest and most pressing questions came from representatives district to imagine how important this is for them, because it is. it’s always important to hear and see the head of state eye to eye, yes, because no matter what visual means we have, it’s still so impossible to convey these emotions and what was happening, so imagine how much it is for them important, important because what happens inside and on

the outside, and because the head of state has such amazing charisma, he gives calm and stability, conveys this calm and stability directly to you, it is important that the conversation is open. not formalized, everyone could ask a question that really interests him, and what does it mean for a journalist of a regional newspaper to ask a question to the head of state directly, without going through any additional authorities, yesterday very many...

a rather interesting thesis was also voiced regarding this , that belarusian journalists should pay attention in many ways and make reports based on the interests of belarusians, and not, for example, those topics which specifically concerns you, national content, yes, that’s what we said about national content, this is firstly, secondly, in fact, we are such a very compact country, yes, when we talk about the growth of the media, why local media is always important because it shows people's lives. and the president yesterday focused on this, show this combine operator who is descending from his spaceship,

he made an amazing comparison, yes, with these with your tired hands you show him a man from the ground who works, in fact there is a big demand for this, we see it, and we see it from views, not only of tv channels, but we also see from views in telegram channels, for example, people are interested in peaceful agenda, there is a request for peace, there is a request for there to be a request even for cats and dogs, just like we... when we call this news, because it is really important for people to live, we are , fortunately, a country that is not at war , but lives, despite all these external the moments that are around us, we still live, with us. life is with you, we raise children, go to work, harvest bread, and this should also be the filling of our broadcasts. just when i was on my way to the broadcast, literally 40 minutes ago i was talking with the staff of glinke college, i have such a tradition, i have my own small social research, i always ask the question, how many people set themselves a task, a direct

task, contribute this you know in your such a schedule, conditionally in your head, that you need to turn on the tv and... watch the news in order to understand how the situation is developing in your country, in the world, and so on, and how to navigate this situation, what decisions to make, and so on, you know, most of the audience raised their hands, that is people watch the news almost every day, watch what we do, and this, for the most part, again imposes a special responsibility when you understand that there really is someone behind the screen, so to speak, because unfortunately there is no such connection enough and just meeting with artificial intelligence, machine learning, there is some kind of opposition to this, besides the fact that, as the president says, we need to leave our editorial offices more often, go to people and talk directly, we don’t need to be afraid of

artificial intelligence, there is technology here that just needs to be done correctly. use a b appropriate legislation and regulations, because the main problem of artificial intelligence is the possibility of falsifying news, falsifying meanings, that is when artificial intelligence generates some kind of official, and some kind of fake information is disseminated on his behalf, for example, yes, this must be stopped, this is the most important point, which means that officials... at least responsible individuals cannot use artificial intelligence to implement, to relay their opinions, this should be the main rule, uh, the people's republic of china, by the way, is the very first state that created a legislative and standard framework, a standardized framework regarding artificial intelligence and its

use, we need to study this experience, because we are now seeing the age of information wars.

this issue is being raised at the highest level, and the president even, in my opinion, when meeting with the pioneers, just said that he even saw deep fakes being made with him, where he speaks french and so on , and says that maybe we are our older generation, they will somehow still determine on a mental level that you are being deceived somewhere. here with the youth, with creative intelligentsia, with people who are still guided by emotions in understanding, in understanding, say, our world, it is much more difficult and necessary to come to such audiences and talk, so in no case should we end our practice, which we began after twenties, you said that you were now in college, but

i heard correctly, we should really teach our children to talk eye to eye. use in your speeches, is this an accident or is this, this is not an accident, moreover, we just didn’t notice this for a while, didn’t pay attention, but

our western colleagues hid it very well, it was still a result of the second world war, this cultural racism, they always tried to hide it all the time, it was a shame,

so here again, look, even the conflict in ukraine, it would seem, is yes, how

do some residents of latin america or africa view the conflict in ukraine? there are a huge number of wars going on in africa, but no one at the security council level, at the international level the community does not discuss them and says that it is necessary to introduce some kind of sanctions, to force someone to peace, that’s a different story. letel began to cooperate to the maximum extent, rebooting these relations, yes, why,

because for these countries the conflict in ukraine became a form of opportunity to emancipate, to free themselves from this western infection, here in the information space it is very important for us, namely emancipation, namely liberation . from already hammered in, and sometimes we don’t even notice the theses, as if they were part of our everyday life, we must also emancipate ourselves, we must create, now the question is being raised, they are already starting to create, restore our cinema, literature, moreover, look at the merger more broadly, not only american cinema, there are more chinese cinemas, indian, iranian, turkish there , yes?

but one way or another we already see that germany is for the germans, there are germans over there, yes, here, like this, poland for the poles, less untr, here on the territory of belarus and russia, as we have already indicated, in your opinion, what’s the point this may lead to whether it is possible to somehow pull out directly the european population to show an alternative point of view on some kind of common future, there is a common destiny.

authorities, because each country begins to close down in order to solve its national interests, well, it seems like she’s not doing anything bad, but she understands that it’s easier for her to survive alone today, she has a chance to survive alone and not be drawn in in some next military conflict or somehow at least partially preserve their industry, unfortunately, today everything is moving like this, when there are many small nationally, nationalistically minded states, how it ends, as a rule , with territorial wars, of course, because it’s already a different story, that is, it’s a return. there is something to divide there, return and rollback, yes, because here they tried, as it were, as a united front - to divide the same russia into a large part of small states, or to go somewhere to africa in order to pull out from there everything that yes, now this front seems to be failing, yes this enchantment begins, and then , that is, when they can’t, they start to squabble inside the jar, and then the spiders start killing each other inside their jar, yes, when

they can’t get out there, that’s why it ’s like... by the way, it’s a new form of colonialism, we must understand, on the other hand, these are these trumpists, poleo conservatives, who say: well, actually, your liberal agenda does not work, it is in crisis, let's go back to the bright fifties, where white large families work for large american corporations, there will be such traditional capitalism conditionally, this is all in the interests of americans 100%.

studios have repeatedly discussed that the issue is not only about ideology, we are already in this , most of the leaders of european countries, this generally sounds a bit drunken to us, but they are all under criminal prosecution, the same scholz, the kumekks case, if i’m not mistaken, how only, and this case is not closed as soon as he starts talking about how he would like some

better prices in germany.

will ruin their industry because transnational corporations will take and bring this entire industry to the americans, somewhere else, and maybe they even want to bring this industry, where labor is cheaper there , there are many latin americans whom they will drive to the decision made why strategic industries should have remained in state property, so that no corporation comes and says that we will turn off something there, or we will withdraw the enterprise, it or we will liquidate it. and this is part of the sovereignty of the state, i would like to discuss, including in the context of this situation, what is happening with the schengen zone, new regulations have been adopted, this whole situation is becoming tougher, and in general

, movements within the schengen zone are one of the pillars on which europe and collective, say, europe rested, at the moment, even this question is being called into question, the position on decision-making is being called into question, that...

it is necessary to compare some kind of ratio in one’s head, at least in one’s head, with one’s own forces , the territorial size of the number population with the rhetoric that comes from them and the aggressive agenda that they set, the tone, let’s say, what do you think about this, well, nato is generally such a body of dubious collective security, yes, because nato is more of a bludgeon of the united states, danger, and the binka of the united states, which is given in case of need, when it is necessary to conduct a... some kind of military operations on any territory, well, that’s how it is, it’s not, we’re not talking about defense, yes, we we are talking exclusively about the fact that these are those who lead aggressive policy, no matter how hard they try, regarding the poles and lithuanians and europe, i also wanted to add.