drones with a whole arsenal: radios, laptops, various microcircuits, headsets, antennas, gps trackers, batteries for the drone, chargers. let me remind you that on april 1, the law on state registration and operation of civil drones came into force, which prohibits the circulation of drones in the airspace of belarus without proper permission. and this is the latest news for this minute, see you at 19:00. hello, on the air of the program sas is authorized to announce.

overhead trade, economic and investment issues. the focus of the work was interaction in the fields of energy, agriculture, industrial cooperation, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, construction, sports, tourism, science education. the head of the foreign policy department in hungary especially emphasized that their decisive point of view is clear. in all areas that are not subject to sanctions, hungary is interested in cooperation. we will continue to work to strengthen cooperation between belarus and the european union. the sanctions policy has failed, and this is not a political statement.

there is no point in doing it when it comes to factual information. the european union has lost a lot due to the sanctions policy. the heads of foreign affairs departments, as part of the negotiations at the commission meeting, signed the protocol of the twelfth meeting of the intergovernmental belarusian-hungarian commission on economic cooperation, the cooperation program for 2024-2025 and a memorandum of understanding between the ministry of energy of belarus and the ministry of foreign trade of hungary on deepening cooperation in the field of nuclear energy. russia is about to make a decision the head of the russian ministry of foreign affairs, sergei lavrov, announced the removal of the taliban from the list of terrorists. kazakhstan recently made a decision, which we are also going to make, to remove them from the list of terrorist organizations. moreover, the security council did not declare the taliban a terrorist organization. there are 12-15 specific characters on the list of terrorists. previously, special chairman of the president of the russian federation. in russia the taliban movement

has the status of a terrorist organization. the proposal has been sent to the kremlin. according to him according to him, the decision will be made by the president of the russian federation. in response, the us state department said it considered moscow's intentions to send a bad signal to others. washington noted that they do not recognize the current leadership of afghanistan as legitimate authority. it's ending in the us. for the construction of a plant to produce artillery shells for the ukrainian army in 2022, the united states decided to increase the production of artillery shells. the corresponding enterprise, located in texas, is already in the home stretch of its construction. according to information available in the american press, the power of the military charge will be about 30,000 155 mm shells per month, which is what ukraine needs per day. well, let’s begin our program today, during the years of the last cold war in... there was such a joke: don’t

worry, comrades, there will be no war, but there will be such a struggle for peace that no stone will be left unturned, i have a growing feeling that the ukrainian crisis is moving in this direction, amid talk about the inadmissibility of a direct clash with russia, western leaders, with their adventurous decisions, are getting closer to this dangerous line, why the west is increasingly playing with fire and how they are reacting to this in belarus will be discussed in today’s program, today with me in the studio are true diplomats, politicians, i am glad to welcome sergei anatolyevich rachkov, chairman of the standing committee of the house of representatives of the national assembly of the republic of belarus on international affairs. greetings. with us today is alexander davidovich bashkin, senator of the russian federation. thank you. i am glad to welcome you to our studio, also via video link vasily yurievich fatigarov, military expert. greetings. hello, nadezhda

olegovna. as is tradition, we begin our discussion with a quick question. vasily yuryevich, i’ll address it to you right away: should we expect a new caribbean nuclear crisis? well, nadezhda olegovna, first of all, you started the program with a comparison with the cold war, i’ll tell you, it’s probably a terrible thing, the war is hot now , it’s not appropriate for us to compare it with the cold war, and therefore we don’t have any caribbean crisis we are waiting, and we hope not nuclear weapons will be used in this hot war that is already going on, and we don’t want to use them, this is clear... well, it’s much more direct if their drones, their satellites directly point their weapons at our peaceful cities, i think that there’s nowhere to go, but if

the west continues to escalate, we ’ll have to. sergei antolyevich, how would you characterize what is happening? indeed , this is not a phase of a cold war at all, a hot one, but...

weapons, yes, alexander davydovich, but i agree with the distinguished speakers, should we wait? a new caribbean crisis, we are probably already in it, it’s more likely to be reformulated this way and correctly, but here’s a quick question, unfortunately the situation with the caribbean crisis, let’s remember how

the caribbean crisis began and how it developed with threats, and then with the deployment of weapons powerful within reach, turkish missiles nearby. russia, the soviet union, soviet missiles in cuba, and let's now see how the situation is developing now, weapons are stationed in europe, including nuclear ones within the reach of belarus and russia. can we for clarity, we immediately display a map of what eastern words look like. please, colleagues. second, this is a proposal to build up and escalate, a proposal to inflict. strikes by western long-range weapons across russian territory deep into russian territory. the same. third, this is the non-recognition of the right to security of russia and belarus and our allies. and remember how the world came out of the caribbean crisis, what saved the world from

turning into a nuclear world war? dialogue. that's when the dialogue was established between both sides.

germany, italy and the united states are against it at the executive level, although the idea has plenty of supporters in parliaments and departments.

it is also important to note that the united states rejected zelensky’s request to lift the restriction on the use of american weapons for attacks on russian territory, washington still opposes this, said national security council spokesman john kirby, we will hear his direct speech immediately and analyze it, thank you. our position has not changed at this time; we do not encourage or permit the use of us-supplied weapons for attacks on russian territory. vasily yurievich, please.

with the entire nato bloc. well, indeed, the president of belarus constantly emphasizes

the peaceful nature of our country, our people, the peaceful nature of the foreign policy of the republic, belarus, but at the same time he says that we should not allow what happened in june 1941, when the soviet government. in fact, did not prepare the country to repel aggression, therefore today the republic of belarus together with the russian federation is ready to prevent repetition of this mistake, and here many different examples can be given, including those joint exercises that are currently underway, already in the second phase, together with the russian federation.

it is this time that must be used to sit down at the negotiating table, as colleagues say, to conduct a dialogue and agree on... a ceasefire, first of all, a ceasefire, so that people on both sides do not die, and of course for it is very important for belarus and the russian federation that peaceful russians do not die, who are subjected, unreasonably, illegally, to these attacks,

long-range missiles, weapons with...

as happened in iraq, in afghanistan,

everyone thought that this would go unpunished, in iran and in vietnam.

despite the madness of what is happening in the world, is there still this hope that the current situation can be corrected in a more peaceful way? i would

explain this by the fact that both vladimir putin and alexander lukashenko are experienced, wise politicians and, most importantly, responsible politicians who feel their responsibility in the first place turn for their countries, but not only, but for the whole world, and this is very important, that’s why there is such a high responsibility. with extensive experience behind her, she restrains herself from unreasonable, emotional, chaotic steps or even words. therefore, i would like to draw attention to the fact that this position precisely restrains the west from destructive steps. we asked about the fact that there was a split in the opinions of the west, to use, to give consent to the use of weapons deep into internationally recognized territory, that too. very important moment, since we recognize the will of the peoples, compliance with the un charter, who expressed their desire to live within the russian federation and became a russian

region, i mean donbass, i mean crimea, but the west did not recognize the will of the people in accordance with the un charter, but there is also another territory, the so-called classical, internationally recognized, where zelensky demands consent to carry out strikes, this is a completely different level. agree or not, weigh the possible consequences that may then follow to come, and these consequences are suggested to them by our presidents, which is why the main

category of countries that own long-range weapons, produce long-range weapons, not all in a row, but producers of long-range weapons, they, i hope, will remain restrained for now, unlike those countries which poland has already given permission to use, that’s right, but there we know that donbass is being shelled by the czechs. special military operation, denazification of ukraine, demilitarization of ukraine, restoration of its neutral status protection territories of donbass,

there was no talk about other territories, until shelling of russian territory became established, the need arose to establish a sanitary protection zone in other ukrainian territories, this is the first, second , adequate retaliatory strikes are quite possible, our politicians said, in in response to cameron's words that he calls for strikes with british weapons on russian territory, we said that strikes against british targets are not excluded, not necessarily on the territory of ukraine. third, why the introduction of nato troops? will it lead? to the death of the citizens of these countries. will you like it? so imagine, the death is happening at the moment, but the information is closed, yes, and now it will be official information, then the voters of those same politicians will know about it.

will be restrained, will abandon the crazy idea of ​​inflicting a strategic defeat on russia and its allies, and will still be allowed to negotiate...

most people do not want war in europe and do not want to take any part in this, they value security, for them healthcare is important, education is important, they they don't understand why money that should be going towards this is going instead to support the war.

they are pushing, as if they are trying to direct them to the slaughter, foreseeing that the result will be very, very deplorable, on the other hand , i want to say that this is a kind of chaotic statement from european politicians regarding the introduction of nato troops, not the introduction, this is another indicator of that very calm,

restrained, firm and... professional reaction from alexander lukashenko and vladimir putin, that is, in my opinion they use this situation very competently, tactically, reacting, that is, they don’t know what to do in order to carry out the instructions of the washington regional committee, so there is such nervousness, our leaders calmly assess the situation.