who understand this, that they are being pushed, as if they are trying to direct them to the slaughter, foreseeing that the result will be very, very disastrous. on the other hand, i want to say that this is a kind of chaotic statement from european politicians regarding the introduction of nato troops , not the introduction of nato troops, this is also an indicator of that very calm situation.

its complexity, yes, vasily yuryevich, well , look, if, say, the same poles or french provoke the russian federation to strike a specific military facility, for example, on the territory the same poland, lithuania or romania, how could the situation develop in this case? you know, i’ll say this, if it starts, that’s where it all ends, having opened a pandora’s box with nuclear weapons, close it already, i, as a military man, say, it will be... already impossible, no one will count where the tactical, where strategic, so we are responsible people in every possible way, i completely agree with my colleagues who, as parliamentarians , spoke very carefully on this topic, we certainly must do everything to prevent this blow from happening, i will answer your question briefly, and the extent of our blow and further events will depend on what our enemies provoke us and force us to do. we

ourselves don’t want anything, but there are two points: first, our french colleague, when speaking, always emphasized that remember, russia is a nuclear power, there is no need to joke with it, such voices of individual politicians are already heard, in particular, that the russian federation needs to carry out a nuclear test explosion so that everyone can see this nuclear fungus, they reminded to the whole world, what is it?

they blow, but they give money for weapons, for armed struggle, for the seizure of at least a piece of land on the territory of belarus, they need this, the americans, first of all, not even the europeans, yes, alexander davydovich, here is a chronicle of the acute phase of the military conflict in ukraine - this a chain of constant raising of the ceiling, a possible lowering of the risk threshold by the west. and this is what alexander grigorevich talks about, unfortunately, they don’t hear about what the key goals are to preserve their statehood, their sovereignty, but not to attack poland and lithuania, the baltic countries, you know, they have a rather strange position, you remember, the tail tells the dog, and the famous film, on the other hand, you don’t understand who the instigator of all this is, you mentioned the baltic countries, oddly enough, the smaller the state, the

smaller contribution, i mean the eu state, the smaller the contribution to the economy,

please, we will still do what we think is necessary, regardless of who is on the territory of ukraine, this is what they should know for sure. yes, vasily yurievich, please, you have the floor, they need it, this is the key question, ordinary citizens don’t know anything about this, in china, yes, in arab countries, probably in the west, they have a complete information vacuum there, they are brainwashed, so to speak, no worse than the citizens of ukraine, therefore, they simply really thank... their ruler does not create this danger, and i will once again, so to speak, emphasize that our peacefulness and our restraint can play a cruel joke due to the fact that they measure us by themselves, they think , since we are not striking at them yet,

well, we are not shooting down drones, but the houthis shoot down, we do not strike at the starlink, which directly controls the drones here, and not at the shooter, and i personally saw how these drones... strike at our positions, that is, they directly fight against us, we not even though we don’t escalate this, but they believe that this is our weakness, this is theirs... a perverted understanding can lead to them escalating, then anything can happen, because the respected deputies spoke strategically about the caribbean crisis with which we began the discussion, and if we take the tactical moment when there was the cuban missile crisis, remember the blockade of cuba, when the world was on the verge of a nuclear strike, because the commander of our submarine, which was surrounded by enemy ships, decided to strike a nuclear torpedo and...

is now on the brink of a nuclear disaster, this must be clearly understood and we must be very responsible in this position. thank you, vasily yurievich, this is important. let me remind you that on the air of the program sas is authorized to announce discussions in the western establishment regarding the permissibility of strikes by western weapons on the territory.

defend the right to self-defense. stoltenberg was among the first who not only agreed, but called for allowing ukraine to strike russia with western weapons. according to the nato secretary general, this does not threaten a direct collision. kiev’s actions in this case can be qualified as self-defense, the politician noted, and therefore continued to promote his idea to the masses, where it partially found a response. so in lithuania and latvia they see no reason limit kyiv. britain and sweden also gave the go-ahead for attacks on russian territory with western weapons. stoltenberg is confident. that others should make similar decisions, and in general, comprehensive support for the kiev regime is the basis of european foreign policy.

those who disagree should be prepared, at a minimum, for criticism. in fact, almost all of our discussions and necessary eu decisions and decisions are blocked by just one country: hungary. this doesn't happen occasionally, so we need to start looking at it as systems approach, we need to start talking about it. warsaw does not want criticism of itself, so it approved the idea of ​​attacking russian territory with nato weapons. head of the ministry he called on poland to allow kiev to take similar actions. it is curious that warsaw constantly talks about certain threats from the east, although it actually approves terrorist attacks. however, not everyone supported them. in europe, a split is completely overdue on the issue of ukraine. germany and italy are against stoltenberg's initiative. the german chancellor does not plan to allow the use of german weapons to strike russia. according to scholz, there are clear and agreed rules for arms supplies between berlin and kiev. marry them. germany does not intend to frame it. another pressing issue for europe is the sending of military instructors to ukraine.

paris was the first to talk about this. commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine syrsky signed documents allowing the admission of french specialists to training centers in the country. in europe there is no consensus on this matter yet. regarding the implementation of part of the training there have been debates in ukraine, but there is no clear pan-european position on this matter. overall, the message of the meeting in brussels is clear. comprehensive assistance to ukraine, priority of eu foreign policy. fourth, do you think there would be a chance to change the behavior strategy? it seems to me

that you know, this demonstrative refusal of the united states of america to consider the proposals of the russian federation to ensure the security of not only russia, but security in general, it indicates that the west was not ready. to go towards russia, belarus, the west continued to strive to move on.

india, brazil, that is, those countries that today, of course, have already seriously gotten on their feet, they are forming blocs, so to speak, mainly socio-economic, geopolitical, well, not far off, and maybe military-strategic, well such a bloc as, for example, the csto, which includes

the republic of belarus and the russian federation, therefore. it seems to me that the development of events is conditioned by this reorganization of the world, by the fact that the order that was adopted after the second world war, as a result of the creation of the united nations, it has practically ceased to exist, and today each of these countries understands that it is necessary to defend its national interests,

there was a chance when the russian federation at the end of the twenty-first year proposed nato to the countries in writing europe has a simple move: abandon further nato advance to the east, return ukraine to neutral status, stop placing weapons near russian territory, and threaten russia. we are arrogant this was the result of the fact that ukraine,

to the applause of the west, changed its neutral status in the constitution and demanded. american, in kharkov experiments began to be carried out with fissile materials, it was all impossible not to see, and it all had to be stopped, so the world always has a chance, several years ago, 2-3 years ago, we thought that it was all over when suddenly the whole world was engulfed by an epidemic, a pandemic.

territory , military people hate war more than anyone, so i went through almost all the hot spots on i, too, as a military man, you know that the former soviet union, and now i very often go there to the line of combat contact, i’ll tell you, war is terrible and... i sincerely hope that dear alexander davydovich is right, and when we somehow, as we now look at the defeated pandemic, let’s look at this terrible situation that has developed now. from a new multipolar world, a just world, with a fair world order, we will be glad that there were wise politicians, whom i also agree, there are actually more of them, it’s just that

not wise politicians are now placed in key positions, this is the worst thing in the west, but the wisdom of the people, the wisdom of politicians will win, and we will live in peace, most importantly, we will live, yes, thank you very much, sergei anatolyevich, you are like a diplomat, i want you to turn to our belarusian.

by the spring of 2024 they might not have believed it, but the course is linear, which means that there is no reason to expect any other dynamics, in other words, everything that is being discussed is how a hypothetical escalation will become real over time in the use of weapons and the sending of troops. not fun but honest, see you in a week, thank you, this was a program with the authority to say, western elites have lost their fear of war, and this is pushing the world.

abyss club of editors , almost all european countries fought on the side of hitler’s germany except serbia and greece.