in the death of animals from the fence of lithuania, latvia and poland. the color of concentration camps and burned villages and partisan exploits on the walls of the palace of art in minsk, the exhibition dedicated to the great victory updated the painting. this is a new batch from the fund of the belarusian union of artists. let me remind you that the voices of the military generation are available for free viewing every day. here are artists born before the war; they saw the war with their own eyes. we can’t imagine how it was, and yet, on the contrary, i look at the paintings of eduard kufko, a master who lived in brest shmat bastards, to the veterans of the war, and all the bastards from 41 to 45, the right of the chancellor in germany, you know, it’s just not soft, the skin here is like that, and in contrast, we know the issue paula maslennikau, as landscapes, like jumping, like nostalgic landscapes, then here we are...

of the union, artists, designers and architects. my colleagues will have more information at 15:00 on our air, all the best.

hello, i am authorized to announce on the air of the sas program, i and the presenter nadezhda sas. greetings. in today's program we will talk about the increase in nervousness and aggressiveness on the part of nato, but immediately after further key events in world politics this week. the head of the foreign ministries of belarus and hungary, sergei aleynik, and peter szijarta held a bilateral meeting in minsk. the minister of foreign affairs of foreign trade of hungary arrived in belarus. to participate in a meeting of the intergovernmental belarusian-hungarian commission on economic cooperation. the parties discussed a number of applied trade, economic and investment questions. the focus of the work was interaction in the fields of energy, agriculture, industrial cooperation, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, construction, sports, tourism, and science education. the head of the foreign policy department in hungary especially emphasized that the determination of their point of view is clear. in all areas that are not subject to sanctions, hungary is interested in cooperation. we will continue to work on strengthening.

cooperation between belarus and the european union, the sanctions policy has failed, and this is not political statement. there is no point in doing it when it comes to factual information. the european union has lost a lot due to the sanctions policy. the heads of foreign affairs departments, as part of the negotiations at the commission meeting, signed the protocol of the twelfth meeting of the intergovernmental belarusian-hungarian commission on economic cooperation. cooperation program for 2024-2025 and a memorandum of understanding between the ministry of energy of belarus and the foreign ministry.

i think there are 12-15 specific characters. previously, the special chairman of the president of the russian federation federation for afghanistan, director of the second department of asia zamir kabul said that the ministry of foreign affairs and the russian federation have concluded a study on the possible removal of the status of a terrorist organization from the taliban movement in russia. the proposal has been sent to the kremlin. according to him, the decision will be made by the president of the russian federation. in response , the us state department said it considered moscow's intentions to send a bad signal to others. washington noted that they would not recognize it. leadership of afghanistan by legitimate authority. in the usa the construction of a plant for the production of artillery shells for the ukrainian army is being completed. in 2022, the united states decided to increase the production of artillery shells. the corresponding enterprise located in the state of texas is already at the finish line of its construction. according to information available to the american press, the power of the military charge will be about 30,000 155 mm shells per month. ukraine needs that much per day. well, let’s begin

our program today; during the last cold war there was a joke: no worry, comrades, there will be no war, but there will be such a struggle for peace that... no stone will be left unturned, i have a growing feeling that the ukrainian crisis is moving in this direction, amid talk about the inadmissibility of a direct clash with russia, western leaders with his adventurous decisions, he is getting closer to this dangerous line. why the west is increasingly playing with fire and how belarus is reacting to this will be discussed in today’s program; true policy diplomats are with me in the studio today. glad to welcome sergei anatolyevich.

caribbean nuclear crisis? well, nadezhda olegovna, first of all, you started the program with i’ll immediately address it to you: should we expect a new comparison with the cold war, i’ll tell you, it’s probably a terrible thing, the war is now hot, it’s unfortunately not appropriate for us to compare it with the cold war, and therefore we do not expect any caribbean crisis, we hope that it will not be applied in this mountain.

in fact, in a state of nuclear crisis, certain facts speak about this, first of all, this is a serious modernization of nato of its nuclear weapons located at air bases in five european countries, this

is evidenced by the fact that poland is raising the question of the deployment of nuclear weapons on its territory to the united states of america. but let’s also say about the republic of belarus, we returned not strategic, but tactical weapons to our territory, precisely as a response to the current situation, so tension is seriously growing, and of course no one, i agree with our colleague, no one would want this phase of psychological warfare in this... area the escalation of the situation has actually escalated into the use of this terrible weapon. alexander davidovich, but i agree with the respected speakers, should we expect a new caribbean crisis, we are probably already in it, it’s more likely

to reformulate it this way and correctly, but here’s a quick question to compare the situation with the caribbean crisis, let’s remember how it began and how the caribbean crisis developed with threats, and then ... the replacement of powerful weapons within reach: turkish missiles near russia, the soviet union, soviet missiles in cuba, and let's now see how the situation is developing now; weapons are stationed in europe, including nuclear weapons within the reach of belarus and russia. alexandrovich, can we immediately, for clarity, display a map of what the eastern flank looks like? please, colleagues. secondly, this is a proposal to increase escalation, a proposal to strike deep into russian territory with western long-range weapons. the same. third, this is the non-recognition of the right to security of russia

and belarus and our allies. and remember how did the world come out of the caribbean crisis, what saved the world from turning into a nuclear world war? dialogue, when dialogue was established, when both sides recognized the right to equal and indivisible security, the danger passed.

the authorities are against it, although the idea has enough supporters in parliaments and departments.

secretary general stoltenberg actually supported these plans. vasily yuryevich, do you think that america is still ready to enter the war in ukraine. we understand that nato soldiers are already present. ukrainian military are being trained these same military leaders, that is, in fact, there is a precedent for participation. but about the full-scale entry into... america, in our

language, he is blatantly lying, but because there are already territories, well, western weapons, there, cases of the use of weapons of the united states , you know how difficult it is to figure out who planted a specific missile there, and about this even the western press is already writing with certain evidence.

to a frantic arms race, the republic of belarus remains a faithful ally of the russian federation, but at the same time retains the key, this is national sovereignty, takes care of the security of the state and is a key value, these are human lives, this was said not so long ago at a media forum in mogilev, and i think that sooner or later such a balanced, wise position will be written about in more than one textbook. to analyze, because it is extremely difficult today, despite the fact that the republic of belarus is territorially

located geopolitically in the foreground, that is, it is actually face to face with enemy states that are hostile to the entire nato bloc. well indeed, the president of belarus constantly emphasizes the peaceful nature of our country, our people, peaceful. today, the republic of belarus, together with the russian federation, is ready to prevent this mistake from happening again, and many different examples can be given here, including those joint exercises that are currently underway, the second phase is already underway jointly with

the russian federation, the republic of belarus, trains military personnel to use tactical nuclear weapons. weapons that are currently located on the territory of the republic of belarus, but we once again emphasize that this line, it is strategic, the president repeats this idea from speech to speech that now is an extremely dangerous time, but on the other hand, it is precisely this time that must be used to sit down at the negotiating table and ... that’s what colleagues say, to hold a dialogue and agree on a ceasefire, first of all a ceasefire, so that people on both sides do not die, and of course for belarus and the russian federation it is very important that, well,

peaceful russians do not die who are exposed unreasonably, illegally exposed. with these shellings, long-range missiles, weapons, the consent of a number of western countries, and i agree with my colleague that what is stated in the white house, in the state department, in the pentagon, we must decipher these very clearly and feel this subtext, after all , to a large extent, the foreign policy of the united states is based on hypocrisy and... when the americans themselves, it’s unlikely, i don’t admit that they are american military personnel, i emphasize that military personnel are not mercenaries, set foot on ukrainian soil, they will continue to work with the hands of other countries, yes sergei antonich, if earlier we listened to the statements of state leaders and

took them seriously enough, then there was a period when these were elements. intimidation, then today this or that thesis that is being thrown into society, the same statements by macron, will most likely come to life sooner or later, and practice suggests that this is no longer probing public opinion, but preparing for public opinion in order to implement this scenario already, so i think it is necessary to take it very seriously regarding the statements of these... so -called politicians that it is possible that nato will enter ukraine. yes , a french analyst, a french political expert, nicolas merkovich, is joining our broadcast right now. mr. mirkovic, mr. mirkovic, we are very glad to see you on our tv show. thank you very much for inviting me.

thank you very much, and my first question is: whatever european leaders tell their constituents and even themselves.

balanced, restrained positions of vladimir putin, alexander lukashenko, then is there, despite the madness of what is happening in the world, there is still this hope that

the current situation can be corrected in a more peaceful way? i would explain this by the fact that both vladimir putin and alexander lukashenko are experienced, wise politicians and, most importantly, responsible politicians who feel responsible primarily for their countries, but not only for the whole world. and this is very important, therefore such a high responsibility, with a lot of experience behind it, it restrains from unreasonable, from emotional, from chaotic steps or even words therefore, i would like to draw attention to the fact that this position precisely restrains the west from destructive steps. we asked yes about the fact that there was a split in opinions.

a very important approach, because politicians who decide to give consent or not weigh the possible consequences

that may follow after this, and these consequences are suggested to them by our presidents, which is why the main category of countries that own long-range weapons, produce long-range weapons, not all in a row, and manufacturers long-range weapons, they just for now, i hope, will remain restrained, unlike those countries,

ukraine, the restoration of its neutral territories was out of the question until the status of protection of the territory of donbass, about others , shelling of russian territory was established, the need arose establishing a sanitary protection zone already in other ukrainian ones. this is the first, the second is quite possible adequate retaliatory strikes, our politicians said that in response to cameron’s words that he calls for strikes with british weapons on russian territory, we they said that attacks on british targets, not necessarily on ukrainian territory, could not be ruled out. third, the introduction of nato troops, what will it lead to? to the death of the citizens of these countries. will you like it? so imagine, death is happening at the moment, but information.

all the factors are very then, by the way, it can seriously make changes to the nuclear doctrine, causing such damage to the russian federation, so i believe that western politicians will still be restrained, abandon the crazy idea of ​​inflicting a strategic defeat on russia and its allies will still be allowed to participate in the negotiated peace process. mr. mirkovic, here in belarus.

and if we look at the results of public opinion polls before the elections, we see that there is a high probability that the situation in the country will change. it will certainly be more convenient to negotiate with trump than with john joe biden, because he will have a less principled position, so the question. i think this is

very important and... we can also look at france, for example. after the twentieth february, for even two weeks people don’t really understand what’s going on. france is spending a billion dollars on this war. and he plans to send his soldiers. and what is this anyway? more and more people do not agree with this, they do not understand what happened at all. most people do not want war in europe and do not want to take any part in it. they value security. healthcare is important to them, education is important,

they don’t understand why money that should go to...

by someone else's hands, as they usually do. yes, vasily, i’ll give you the floor right away, please. well, i want to remind you, here are the words of alexander grigorevich lukashenko, which he said during the all-belarus people's assembly. he noted that the united states, today the united states is striving to exert military action in ukraine on nato and europe. and, of course, of course, i am sure that there are sensible people. not only among the peoples of europe, but among politicians who understand this, that they are being pushed, they are, as it were, they are trying to direct them to slaughter, foreseeing that the result will be very, very disastrous, on the other hand, i want to say that this is kind of a chaotic statement from european politicians regarding whether to send in nato troops or not

. this is also an indicator of the very calm, restrained, firm and professional reaction on the part of alexander lukashenko and vladimir putin. despite all its complexity, yes, vasily yuryevich, well, look, if, say, the same poles or french provoke the russian federation to strike at a specific military facility, for example, on the territory of poland, lithuania or romania,

how might the situation develop in this case? you know, i’ll say this, if it starts, that’s where it all ends, having opened a pandora’s box with nuclear weapons, close it with a military box. i say, it will no longer be possible, no one will count what is tactical and where is strategic, so we, as responsible people, will do our best, i completely agree with my colleagues who, as parliamentarians , spoke very carefully on this topic, we certainly must do everything to ensure this the strike did not happen, i will answer your question briefly: and the extent of our strike and further events will depend on what we are provoked and forced to do.

what is nuclear war, by the way, mr. karaganov’s recent publication is about this , that is, why? because when we talked about the cold war, after all, this concept of fear is costly, apparently this fear is no longer there, physically, so to speak, absent, generations have changed, perhaps people have forgotten what those explosions in nagasaki were like.

nuclear deterrence activities

added: this is the deployment near the borders of russia of material and technical means capable of carrying nuclear weapons. this is a reminder that f-16s can carry nuclear weapons, and this is another motive for nuclear deterrence measures, which we naturally carry out without replacement, in the form of, for example, exercises using non-strategic nuclear weapons, and regarding use, read . damaging military infrastructure, which can be used for early warning of an attack, this is also a belli incident, and recent ukrainian attempts to attack radar stations, which, by the way, are primarily designed to monitor long-range nuclear attacks, are playing with fire. gentlemen, this is a danger, and even

the overseas patrons who slapped these experimenters understand this, that’s why stop probing, stop checking, stop increasing, pay attention to what all this escalation is for, what all this is for, including the profit of the military-industrial complex , a transnational company, this, this is the psychology of people who live for today, look how sharply they have increased. are leading in their states in the elections to

the european parliament, this is an obvious witch hunt, but i will also pay attention to a fresh quote from a press conference in tashkent by vladimir putin regarding the reaction to possible western troops in ukraine, we will hear direct speech and comment on what concerns that in ukraine, in ukraine there can be or are mercenaries, but we know about this well, there is nothing new here, what does that mean... yes, vasily yuryevich, please, you have the floor,

they need it, this is the key question, ordinary citizens don’t know anything about this, in china, yes, in arab countries, probably in the west, they have a complete information vacuum there, they are brainwashed, so to speak, no worse than among the citizens of ukraine, so they simply really, thanks to their rulers, do not create this danger, and i will once again, so to speak, emphasize that our love of peace and our... restraint can play a role due to the fact that they measure us by themselves, the evil just kidding, they think since we haven’t struck them yet, well, there are no drones there we shoot down, but the houthis shoot down, we do not strike at the starlink, which directly controls the drones of these little guys, and not shooting, and i personally saw how these drones strike at our positions, that is, they directly fight against us, we although we do not escalate this. and they believe that this is our weakness, this

perverted understanding of theirs can lead to the fact that they will escalate, then, anything can happen, because the respected deputies spoke strategically regarding the caribbean crisis, with which we began the discussion, and if we take the tactical moment when there was a caribbean crisis, remember the blockade of cuba, when the world was on the verge of a nuclear strike, because the commander of our submarine, which was surrounded by... enemy ships , decided to strike with a nuclear torpedo, only the wise balanced position of the senior captain on board of the second rank, who later became an admiral, and he insisted, he could not order. the senior on board does not command, he only gives recommendations, he persuaded, convinced commander not to use nuclear weapons, a nuclear torpedo, that’s the only reason the war didn’t start, where is the guarantee that now, especially when we are no longer in the cold war, but directly at war, the same situation will not arise, so every day, every second the world

now stands on a hair's breadth away from a nuclear disaster, we must clearly understand this and be very responsible in this position. thank you, vasily yurievich, this is important. let me remind you that on the air of the program, sas is authorized to announce discussions in the western establishment regarding the admissibility of strikes by western weapons on territory of the russian federation and sending nato troops to ukraine. let us recall in more detail in our story. the western establishment is discussing the permissibility of strikes with... weapons on russian territory, for this purpose the defense ministers of the eu countries and representatives of the foreign ministry gathered at a meeting in brussels. nothing new was said there; the calls made have long been familiar to the world community. the fact that we are supplying equipment to ukraine does not make nato a party to the conflict. we have the right to support ukraine without becoming part of the conflict, because we are helping ukraine defend its right

to self-defense. stoltenberg was among the first who not only agreed, but called for allowing ukraine to strike russia with western weapons. according to the nato secretary general, this does not threaten a direct collision. kiev’s actions in this case can be qualified as self-defense, the politician noted, and therefore continued to promote his idea to the masses, where it partially found a response. so in lithuania and latvia they see no reason to limit kiev. britain and sweden also gave the go-ahead for the attacks. on russian territory with western weapons. stoltenberg is confident that others should make similar decisions, and in general , comprehensive support for the kiev regime is the basis of european foreign policy. anyone who disagrees must. be prepared, at a minimum, for criticism. in fact, almost all of our discussions and necessary eu decisions and decisions are blocked by only one country - hungary. this doesn't happen on a case-by-case basis, so we need to start looking at it as a systems approach, we need to start talking about it. warsaw doesn’t want any criticism of itself, so that she approved the idea of ​​attacking russian territory with nato weapons. the head of the ministry of foreign affairs of poland

called for kiev to be allowed to take such actions. it is curious that warsaw constantly talks about certain threats from the east, although it itself approves. terrorist attacks, however, not everyone supported them. in europe, a split is completely overdue on the issue of ukraine. germany and italy are against stoltenberg's initiative. the german chancellor does not plan to allow the use of german weapons to strike russia. according to scholz, there are agreed upon agreements between berlin and kiev clear rules for the supply of weapons. germany does not intend to go beyond their limits. another pressing issue for europe is the sending of military instructors to ukraine. paris, the commander-in-chief, was the first to talk about this. ssu syrsky signed documents allowing the admission of french specialists to training centers in the country. there is no consensus on this matter in europe yet. there have been debates about conducting part of the training in ukraine, but there is no clear pan-european position on this matter. overall, the message of the meeting in brussels is clear. comprehensive assistance to ukraine, priority eu foreign policy. the rhetoric of unification does not

change, but the opinions of a number of countries on issues are being revised. today, among those who disagree with the frankly unprecedented proposal is gense. two, but according to foreign media reports, their number may increase, because the danger in the future is difficult to overestimate. sergei antolyevich, please tell me, if western strategists were told in the spring of 2022 what their actions would lead to and what the whole world would expect in the spring of 2024, do you think there would be a chance to change behavior strategy? i think. that, you know, this demonstrative refusal of the united states of america to consider the proposal of the russian federation to ensure security, not only for russia, but for security in general, it indicates that the west was not ready to

meet russia and belarus , the west continued. the decision to conduct a special military operation, you know, maybe there would be some kind of attempt to stop this frenzied operation.

conference attended by biden may 2021, then geneva and putin happened, i then worked on a ukrainian tv channel, we tried in every possible way to push the ukrainian authorities to find a compromise, because for adequate people it was already clear that this was the last chance, and ukraine could only be.

to abandon further nato advance to the east, return ukraine to neutral status, stop placing weapons near russian territory and threatening russia. we were arrogantly denied this, although they wrote with mockery, well, we understand your anxiety. this is the result of that refusal. this is the result of the fact that ukraine, to the applause of the west, changed its neutral status in the constitution. demanded the abolition of budapest in 1994, that is , she started talking about her nuclear weapons, they began to unfold on the territory of ukraine, and

we now know this for sure, an american biological laboratory, in kharkov, began to conduct experiments with fissile materials, it was impossible not to see it, and this everything had to be stopped, so peace always has a chance, we a few years ago, 2-3 years ago we thought it was all over, when suddenly the whole world went oh. epidemic, coronavirus pandemic, when we saw everywhere, in palermo, bergamo, more reasonable people, more reasonable politicians, our voice must be heard, our voice here in this studio must be heard, so i am deeply convinced that a world catastrophe will not occur that reason will prevail, and we will look back on this crisis someday and put it in the history textbook. thank you, i really hope so. vasily yurievich.

let's look at this terrible situation, which has now emerged from a new multipolar world, a just world, with a fair world order, and we will be glad that there were wise politicians, of whom i also agree, there are indeed more, it’s just that unwise politicians are now placed in key positions, this is the worst thing in the west, but wisdom people, the wisdom of politicians will prevail, and we will live in peace, most importantly, we will live, yes, thank you very much,

no, in other words, everything that is being discussed is how the hypothetical aggravation will become over time real in using weapons and sending troops. not fun, but honestly, see you in a week. thank you, it was a program with the authority to declare. western elites have lost their fear of war, and this is pushing the world into the abyss. we are making a film based on my book, a prison diary. i contacted the federal penitentiary service of russia, i said: “listen, can i take, well, shackles, as if for a film from the 18th or 19th century.” i say:

and they say, just wait, they are prohibited under international law, i say, well, they are. there is in america, this is washington, that is, this is the capital, at a time when it was hot outside, when i was arrested, why was it 15° in the cell, i was simply afraid of becoming a vegetable, because my consciousness is all i have was, we claim that we, as philosophers, give a message to the world where to move, they claim this, they destroy man as such, they do not need him, they need a certain amount. people, which will have a certain amount of resources, all the rest are replaced by artificial intelligence, this is not conspiracy theories, markov project, nothing personal, watch on belarus 24 tv channel

. belarus has good relations with baku and yerevan. it seems to me that belarus intends to continue to maintain these good relations with both parties to this conflict, because we are generally for peace in the world. there are a lot of azerbaijan.

it was as if we had arrived at some kind of seaside resort, cool, it’s enough to behave like hosts of a show at home, and we

arrived at a small village farm, they told us that here they cook very tasty yudo from natural products, did you really come with venezuela itself, of course. welcome to the world of yodishka, hello, the world of organics and the belarusian cowboy, we are studying the history of belarus and exploring its sights, together with foreigners. so, in the altar of our braslav church we see our main shrine, this is the image of the mother of god of braslav volodarka ozeru.