wall, they can agree, skid, but the decision will be made unilaterally, because they are not negotiable, because they are a priori paraphobic. it is extremely important that both totalitarian ideologies , nazism and communism, receive due recognition and condemnation in europe. the world has strongly condemned the nazi regime, and the crimes it committed are required to be studied in the education systems of various countries. information and memories of the brutal crimes committed by the soviet regime must also find their due place in the consciousness europeans. and this is said by a man whose country was among the leaders in the number of people who went over to the side of the fascists. so the lithuanian usurper nausėda proposed in brussels to perpetuate the memory of the victims of the soviet regime. they don’t know how to bend to the owner. the finns are also not lagging behind, following the path of the baltic countries. we have a 1300 km border with russia,

russia invaded finland during the second world war, we lost 10% of our territory, including the land where my grandparents were born and where my father was born. for understanding, in 2020 the investigative committee russia opened a criminal case for genocide in the republic of karelia. it was estimated that the finns maintained 14 concentration camps, as well as over three dozen labor camps and more than 40 prisoner of war camps. the number of victims is estimated at approximately 8.00 civilians, including over 2 thousand children. another historical fact: from 41 to 43, a finnish military formation of 1,408 people operated in ukraine and the caucasus as part of tank divisions. sss viking, so

there are still questions, who is the barbarian? today with us boris aleksandrovich rozhen, a military analyst from russia, is in touch. boris aleksandrovich, hello, how do you assess today putin’s peace proposal to resolve the conflict in ukraine, the assessment of this proposal by european politicians, because ryuta has already stated that this is a consequence of putin’s panic. we see that , firstly, putin first ssvo, he did not refuse a single initial demand, on the contrary, we see a gradual expansion of these demands, because initially, the goals of the ssvo did not include kherson, zaporozhye region, later the conversation was about recognizing these regions as part of russia on the part of opponents, but now we see during the last proposals that the conversation was no longer simple. recognition there in the current

borders according to the lbs, no, we were talking about the borders of the regions, that is, including the cities of kherson and part of the right bank of the dnieper, the city of zaporozhye, well, of course, the territory of donbass, that is, we see not a reduction, but an expansion of these requirements, well a consequence of the west’s refusal of peace agreements that were practically concluded in istanbul, that is, we we see that... these demands are expanding, but it is clear that on the other hand, against the background of the failure of the swiss summit, against the background of the demand of the global south for a suspension or a complete freeze of the war, that is, it is important for them to show that everything is as it is with them it’s going according to plan, that let’s say they have the initiative, but in fact, again , putin’s proposal was widely discussed, even at the failed summit they met with some support. in the global south, at the same time

as calls to continue the war until the last ukrainian, in the global south, to whom in fact, this summit was addressed and to whom putin’s proposals were also addressed, but there was no particular enthusiasm, which even western analytical experts admit, accordingly, of course, they will be brave and say that yes, we will fight until the last ukrainians reach the borders ninety-first year, but again it looks more and more...

well, if we talk about the new nato section, then again, in terms of the set of statements, he is not very different from stoltenberg, that is, there from... initially the choice was from such a pool candidates who were not very different from their predecessors, that is, all, let’s say, potential persons who could somehow deploy the butt, of course , did not even reach the approval stage, so the choice there was initially rather cosmetic, reflecting certain intra-european alignments , when a number of countries fought to push through one candidate or another.

switzerland accused russia of attacking his country during the second world war, so why such statements now? well, first of all, finland, during world war ii. and finland fought not only against the soviet union, finland fought against the anti-hitler coalition, it was declared war not only with the soviet union, but also with regard to those territories that finland was forced to cede to the soviet union.

was connected, among other things, with the massacre in vyborg, the creation of concentration camps, attempts to seize karelia and so on, well, it’s clear that now they are trying to present themselves as white and fluffy, and the recent abolition of finland’s neutrality again shows that those who came radical nationalists have come to power, they are again trying to resume, let’s say, planning, taking into account those plans that were once in finland...

“sso, when he openly said that zelensky’s nazi regime in kiev is going to get nuclear weapons, about which he himself zelensky spoke back in 2021 and shortly before the start of the iso, this was also one of the reasons for the start of the eso, and accordingly this scenario

is still on the table, that is, again, this is either the creation of a dirty bomb, or the hidden provision of nuclear weapons to ukraine for conducting proxies." syria and the united states quite calmly transferred chemical weapons from the arsenals of muammar gaddafi, that is, chemical shells were supplied in the interests of actions directed against the syrian government, so the use of weapons of mass destruction is not some kind of taboo for nato, but naturally there is such a regime as the ukrainian one, which can be used for some attacks against russia, including the use of nuclear weapons in the future, this scenario cannot be underestimated... as for the returned to the territory of our country.