an alliance that does not want to interfere directly, you want ukraine to win, but at the same time you avoid meeting face to face, you hope to interfere with putin without directly interfering, this has been going on for 2 and a half years, well, what happened, it seems to me that it’s not very good, according to the draft summit communication, the alliance is preparing to announce that the path of ukraine’s accession to the bloc is irreversible according to tradition, no clear deadlines, which means... really, until the last ukrainian, as cnn writes, it’s time for nato to tell kiev the terrible truth, it’s time for the biden administration to stop pretend. well, that’s why comedian zelensky continues to be fed with promises. at the same time, they developed a plan to speed up the destruction of ukraine’s supply of weapons that were still available. at the same time, the states intend to create special logistics hubs to involve the eastern european nato states in this. how.

this will end if, against the backdrop of biden’s obvious failure in the pre-election debates and the clearly leading trump, who, if he becomes president, leaves the bloc, fear grows at brussels headquarters, all because there is those who disagree with kyiv's support. details in remarque's project. biden can't handle the consequences. his disastrous debate performance with trump. macron lost political support after the elections to the french national assembly. scholz is also not to say full of energy, and zelensky is only there to break into this peculiar crowd. but that's not the task. they are not going to invite ukraine to nato. in addition, they predict the collapse of the bloc altogether. for america, it has become too expensive and an ineffective toy. an interesting start to the alliance summit. me name is daria rochko. hello. globally

, there are three issues on the agenda: the first is assistance to the independent states, the second is transatlantic security, and the third, most important issue is the preservation of the bloc. let's start with ukraine, it will not be accepted into nato again for at least another 10 years . the application was submitted 2 years ago, at the same time zelensky said that in fact the country was already in the alliance, but oops, the vilnius summit in 23 was a complete disappointment. they never took nezalezhnaya, promising to invite her someday... no one will take responsibility, so please, here are your weapons, ammunition, fight, you will win, come, our house is on the edge, in general, the future of ukraine is very vague now directly depends on the money that is allocated, about peace it is necessary to agree not with nato, with russia, but she is against square's intentions to occupy a place in the block. zelensky’s team is the donors of their country. this is a team that makes money, this is a war team. as soon as peace

negotiations take place, the front stops, martial law is lifted, zelensky should be removed, parliament must take over its powers and hold new presidential elections, in which zelensky will not win. zelensky is fed breakfast and kept on a short leash so that suddenly there is no conversation about the real world, which is why everyone is so shocked by orban and modi. the west needs an escalation of the conflict with the east, and ukraine is just a tool to achieve the goal. true, i admit, there are irrationally thinking people among the bloc who advocate a ceasefire. regarding entry, sweden and finland submitted applications exactly the same year as ukraine. and for some reason both are in nato. the day before, stoltenberg said that the conflict had revealed huge gaps in combat readiness. spain is accused of insufficient funding for the alliance's defense. the fourth largest country in the eu in terms of population and economy this year plans to spend only one whole 28 on defense.

hesitations, coughing, confusion in remarks and incomprehensible chains of statistical data. trump is in the background, clearly in the lead, and this is what scares the members of the alliance. firstly, at the debate he stated that he would not allow conflict. between ukraine and russia, and secondly, if he becomes president, he will leave nato. the fear at the headquarters in brussels is so great that it is already trying to find at least some kind of protection. macron is also not in the best position now; he lost in the parliamentary elections in france itself. why is that bad. currently, more than 2,000 french soldiers are stationed in estonia, lithuania and romania. french military equipment is also located there. the nationalists, who won the first round of parliamentary elections, oppose the sending.

and naturally, this is the party of war, for example, this is the prime minister of slovakia, who proposed peace, yes, but what happened in the assassination attempt and immediately. what’s interesting is that for the third year in a row, the alliance has invited japan, korea, new zealand, and australia to a summit and is trying to form an asia-pacific nato. why go against china? after joining, sweden immediately announced that it was going to strengthen the defense of the island of gotlan in the baltic sea. the swedes were encouraged to indulge in canned food and water.

over the 75 years of nato's existence, it has been a long time since it is clear where there is, and not there to be in trouble. over twenty military operations in vietnam, iraq, yugoslavia, libya, afghanistan and syria, and dozens of other armed conflicts were organized. they are systematically strengthening their military potential along our borders and are essentially preparing for a third world war. and this is no longer for us. the next question is whether the alliance will celebrate its centenary; experts agree that this is unlikely. increasing disagreements between the leaders of countries will not lead to anything good. nato requires large infusions of money, however, they are not leaving now to equip the bloc, to devastate the armies

of members of the allies, all for the good of the independent, whose needs are already difficult to satisfy, although not everyone supports this. remark. in impotent anger, in order to somehow satisfy their global ambitions, which will lead nowhere, just as the road to the alliance will not lead ukraine. we need new, truly functioning and effective platforms to search for stability and peace. conference. security within the framework of the shanghai cooperation organization may become an alternative to the transatlantic munich conference. this opinion was expressed in the trends program by political scientist farhad ibragimov. the expert is sure that the munich conference discredited itself due to double standards in relation to representatives of

the global south. minsk will be able to become a very serious and quite vibrant attractive platform where serious and significant issues will be truly discussed. issues related to strengthening security, that is , within the framework of shanghai, because, again, the main calling of the shanghai organization is precisely strengthening security in eurasia and countering terrorist radical elements and groups that are fueled from the outside, and we can roughly guess who is lobbying for all this, who is financing it. who is behind the attack on a children's hospital in ukraine, who benefits from the tension on... the border with belarus and what are the reasons for the weakening of the american currency, watch the trends project tonight on air. we talked a little higher

about the methods of the anglo-saxons, here is one of them: poland is purposefully aggravating the situation. tonight she stopped taking trucks, coming from belarus. through the kozlovishche checkpoint, there is now a real transport collapse there, and the very hot weather adds to the problems. report from the border by anna buikevich. yeah, we are near the kozlovichi checkpoint, the line of trucks trying to get through to poland stretches for 10 km. more than half a thousand heavy trucks are waiting. today at 3:00 am poland stopped accepting trucks; according to drivers crossing the belarusian-polish border , the poles strengthened control; there was no official warning from the neighboring country. with 14:00 on july 9, the polish side sharply reduced reception, from 3:00 am to 12...