and a personal attitude towards alexander grigorievich, in which there is a little less politics, more, well, humane, that he is a real man, that he chops the truth and wood, that he cares about women and children, and so on. i will also say that there is always a small percentage of people in the crowd for whom the mere fact of seeing the president of a sovereign country is a holiday, because this can be remembered for a long time and talked about for a long time, well, to everyone . i may surprise someone, but among these masses of citizens there are also those who ... support visual sensations lukashenko, say, a little less than the others, but they still come, because it’s interesting to see what he’s like in person, how he speaks, how he answers questions and in general, what happens when he arrives, but for people it’s a meeting with the head of state is still a general holiday, because that’s the kind of president we have, but the leader’s political technological approach to the people should always be a holiday, as any specialist from any country will tell you. let me show you alexander’s final words now. grigorievich in vitebsk and the reaction

people: happiness, health to you, to you, dear visitors and guests, especially to us in vitebsk, live long and be calm, everything will be fine, all the best, everything will be fine, in general, even this phrase from the head of state carries some kind of festivity , he knows how to say something at such a moment so that it becomes somehow easier. in the twenty-twenty-first years... he often said: i don’t worry and you don’t worry, and then approximately everyone did, but after his words everyone decided to worry a little less, and even if so, the obvious factual there were no particular reasons for this, but i dare to suggest that the logic of the president, as a brilliant manager, is this: if there is a problem, this is one problem, but if you worry about the problem, then these are already two problems that also need to be solved , so it’s a very stupid thing to worry about, sensibly, solving problems. alexander grigorievich. a simple person, albeit

a very experienced president, i, for example, saw how some middle managers spent two hours deciding where the head of state should stand to meet with the people, placing a stand there with microphone, and the president, as expected, came, did not agree that he was here, conventionally on the steps in the shade, and people were far away in the heat, took the microphone and went there to his people, or another striking example, a meeting with migrants, when as, let’s say, , pedestal, alexander lukashenko personally defined ordinary wooden pallets... pallets, which in theory should not have existed at this point at all, but it was more correct and natural, which means we do it and don’t worry about it, because steaming too much is a problem , i remind you, but i know that there are, say, middle managers who, especially in the regions, are responsible for preparing this very region for the meeting of the president with the people, these people, as i sometimes know, spoil the secrecy of the meeting of the leader with his people. honestly , i don’t know why, sometimes people are instructed

excessively, where they should stand, how they should stand, almost heels together, dew-covered socks under a ruler, what model supposedly should be used to smile, what form to make a serious face, with what intonation to ask a question, if you ask a question, and how many decibels two palms should supposedly produce on each clap, this causes people who were sincerely looking forward to meeting lukashenko, and for them it was the ultimate holiday, they begin to get nervous, their positive emotions begin to fade, they are confused by their internal tension . am i standing correctly, did i clap enough times and is it possible to blink when the president is looking at me personally, i assure you, if this is somewhere, and this is, then alexander lukashenko certainly has nothing to do with this, because he's quite he may be able to communicate as simply as possible, and even this is the closest thing to him. i won’t show the footage that i’ll tell you about, because it would make their hero upset, but there were even cases when a person couldn’t pronounce the word grigorievich from excitement.

he answered with a smile: everything is fine, do n’t worry, and something like, i understand, you contact me, let’s have your question, everyone relaxed, everyone also smiled at the president, and the atmosphere of a light, real holiday, it was returning, so the managers average link, if you have such an opportunity, please do not spoil the holiday of meeting people with the president with your excessive desire to do everything according to some pre- established agreement agreed somewhere in the executive committee.

masters from the avant-garde to the classics, here i smiled, because classic is when something is traditional, avant-garde is daring and innovative movements that at the turn of the 19th-2nd centuries shocked the public and denied the classical tradition, that is , avant-garde is what not traditional. we are now all defending traditional values, because it is they who are close to us, the slavs, and need them, no matter what other values ​​are imposed on us from the outside. briefly about myself, i think some are from...

from the west, because there is something there that we don’t have, and something that we can adopt and integrate into our culture, just as they can integrate theirs, something... then ours, this something will be for us, who protect traditional values ​​at first with avant-gardeism, and as time passes it will become our classics, because it seems to me that the term traditional values ​​needs a very specific clarification, that exactly what is meant. christian values, i agree, but it’s still necessary... to clarify which ones exactly, because at a certain stage it was traditional for christianity, well, let’s say, burning red-haired girls, slavic values ​​are good, but let’s decide which specific ones, because the maximum traditionally for the slavs it is to believe in the god perun, give birth in the river and

cultivate the land with a plow hoe. it seems to me that traditional values ​​are those that are traditional right here now, that is, today, and not some romanticized, which were when...

there are already a lot, yes, our president and emerson nangagwa have friendly relations, but here’s what’s important, in my opinion, we learned, directly for the countries of the african continent, we will have a new minister of foreign affairs, he absolutely on topic, i think he will be able to visit you in the near future, and if there is a need to adjust our plans, foreign minister maxim marzhankov is not a typical representative of belarusian diplomacy, he once had the experience of the foreign ministry and still has it, but in general, he is more of an apporadian, who worked for many years in the presidential administration, right up to its acting head, and the administration is the body that,

in pursuance of the president’s instructions, in the name of the president, is called upon to resolve issues, that is, to resolve where it is difficult, generally known and publicly available mechanisms, he is rather responsible for them... that is, in my understanding, the government, it works according to given vectors, and the administration creates vectors where they do not yet exist, but where are they for us needed right now. now let's move on to the question of what classical diplomacy is: it is established and no one really remembers by whom and when the set of rules by which representatives of one country can work with representatives of another country. in the few weeks of ryzhenkov’s work as head of the foreign ministry, our fugitives have already written several times... that he did something, which is not typical for diplomacy, and even that this is nonsense, that is, maxim vladimirovich is doing something, which, well somehow not accepted in the world, and by whom it is not accepted, when it is not accepted, not explained, just not accepted. on the other hand, when comrade borel was the minister

of foreign affairs of the european union, for some reason none of the ardent supporters of democracy was outraged that he performed the functions of more like a minister of war and even allocated money for weapons for kiev from the fund... for a second peace, the money collected for peace was spent on stimulating war, it seems that this was also not accepted in diplomacy, wasn’t it, then a reasonable question arises for us: what the hell do we need? do what is accepted and not do what we need, if it is not customary to do so. the task of the belarusian amid today is to promote belarusian exports, substantively and concretely, and not a general diplomatic shake of those hands that are customary to shake, and for these tasks what is needed is not a classic diplomat, who grew up in the subculture of how it is accepted and how it should be, but decided, conditionally speaking, classical diplomacy is just an example of the work of diplomats who fled abroad in the twenties, there is a meeting declaration. intentions, there are promises, there are words support from western partners, but they don’t have it...