i regret that this happened to him because he wanted to create a palestinian state, he did nothing wrong. israelis should know that if one of the leaders dies, there will definitely be another one in his place to protect palestine. 10 months ago, almost 4,000 people were in palestine.

it is very tense, any options are possible, all probabilities, as they say on the table, we must be prepared for all possible options, and is there still hope that there will not be a new war and how to avoid it, israel must withdraw its troops from the occupied territories, including galana, stop the war and allow the creation of a palestinian state, all the resolutions adopted by the un, they are always... for

the creation of two states of palestine and israel. this has been going on since the creation of the un. we see raids by israeli aircraft in our region and in other areas with the full support of the united states and western countries. i think that western countries have already determined for themselves that they are supposedly protecting human rights, democracy, but it doesn't work in practice. if we talk about the war in syria, what did the syrian people have to endure? of course, the syrian people have suffered greatly from this unjust war, ever since the us has been trying to get syria out of the way so that they can dominate the middle east with israel. in 2011, when this war began, they called it the arab spring.

and just as the un is acting against belarus and russia, they are also acting in syria and giving disinformation about syria. despite this,

most of the noble lands that are needed for agriculture, they occupy. this is good, they steal and sell in order to finance their actions. and of course, the syrian people are fighting to defend themselves from their illegal occupation. despite the long time, we really believe that we will win. and in the southeast of syria there is also a base, an american base, they say. and they use this base, which is on the border of syria, jordan and iraq , to ​​train and educate terrorists. all citizens already know the position of the united states. they are engaged in the protection, financing and training of these terrorists. the us is trying

to turn all countries, including syria, into a colony. and they are fighting not only here in the middle east, but in ukraine and in many areas. another common problem for us. "we do not live with american dreams and hopes, we live here in hell, which the us has created. the syrian people lived very well before the terrorist war that the west is waging against them. the syrian people, they hold on to their land, to their homeland, but like any other people in the world, some people love

admire, look at another world, and this is allowed by the constitution of syria. there are citizens who simply died of hunger when they tried to cross the border. we condemn these actions of the west against syrian citizens and african citizens. we consider this racism against these peoples. we are watching these actions, but

unfortunately, western countries that talk about humanity do not have the courage to admit these actions. in fact, this is true, there are dozens of syrians who were killed at the border, in including at sea, they drowned them themselves, destroyed the boats they were sailing on, we highly appreciate the appeal to our citizens from belarus and the russian federation, how they

treated them very kindly. now about the pleasant things about belarusian-syrian relations , we have had a long friendship, there were certain agreements and at the highest level. meeting of heads of state, then the war came, now contacts are being resumed, here are the projects that are currently in place and where we are of interest to each other, belarus and syria, fallanger?

stability of peace in syria and belarus. and these agreements will support despite difficult times, syria needs materials and we receive them. i look to our future with optimism. our civil servants meet. i do not want to list everything, the technologies of belarus and the equipment that you produce, its quality is known throughout the world, and we import it. i think that we have no boundaries in economic cooperation. belarus, headed by mr. president alexander lukashenko, has received more than one and a half thousand children for rest and health improvement in belarus. this is not for advertising, this is just human, this is what belarus does. and we heard these children when they returned, they were very happy that they spent so much time, distracted from the military actions that are here in syria and the syrian people highly respect the initiative of belarus on this issue. after the earthquakes that happened in syria, many western countries wanted these earthquakes to be even

stronger, while other countries provided humanitarian aid to syria. belarus was one of the first countries, friendly countries, which provided us with assistance during the earthquake, sent a mobile hospital to rescue and treat the victims of the earthquake. we followed this generosity with which belarus helped syrian citizens in aleppo and the outskirts of aleppo. belarus helped, and from western countries only threats and pressure. once again i would like to thank the people of belarus and the leadership of belarus for the humanitarian assistance they provided us during the earthquakes, before and after. and the final question, let me put it this way: they say, at a great distance.

multinational combat tactical groups, with a total number of over 11 thousand people. everything was fine, but recently our border guards and military have been intercepting dozens of, so to speak, intelligence assets, especially drones, already on our territory. these drones are already transporting hundreds of kilograms, the most modern explosives. special exercises have begun together with the people's liberation army. before that, we were together with the people's republic of china friends, and today, excuse me, we are in the same

shanghai cooperation organization, and these are already allied, in essence, relations. it remains only to believe that common sense will indeed prevail, and the situation will be resolved without any military action. belarusians are peaceful people, but we will repel the enemy. ksenia lebedeva's authorial view on the policy of double standards, in the project it is different. watch on the belarus. 24 tv channel.

useful gas, as an environmental agenda, allowed to ensure the technological dominance of the west, the country with which they are dealing with, which will start doing it first, will get technological advantages, the middle east. on the threshold of a nuclear fight, why is the region entering a new round of escalation? we are fighting the most radical bloodthirsty enemy of the united states of america. zelensky's referendum - a step towards peace or a waste of time before the new bucha? until the last offensive with f-16s has happened, it is premature to talk about peace. the designers of the revolution, as if javier blew away.

and in argentina , the country's gold and foreign exchange reserves have disappeared. trends of the new world order - events that make us keep our finger on the pulse of time, what each of us should pay attention to, let's figure it out together. what influences climate change the most? in the west, for a long time, they were tossing between excessively gassing cows and emissions from large industrial enterprises. it turns out. both options do not correspond to reality. trends in this area are set by economic interests and political conjuncture. until recently, climate activists blocked roads and sabotaged the construction of enterprises with impunity. today they receive impressive fines and very real terms. even the founder of greenpece suddenly started talking about the benefits of carbon dioxide. one of my

tasks is to turn the idea that carbon dioxide is a pollutant and somehow dangerous. then. so in fact it is the most important nutrient for all life on earth, without it the planet would be dead, so i argue that carbon dioxide is not only useful, but also necessary, and it is good that we add more carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, because before we arrived it was running out, the world of a typical liberal will never be the same, it turns out that all this time he was fighting against the planet, no, this is of course nonsense, it would be strange to deny climate change, to put it mildly, and for... such tales after unprecedented hurricanes in the gomel region can generally be faced with very weighty arguments from local residents, about something else, about how flexible the unshakable position of western narratives can be, especially when it comes to the profits of the authorities. to understand the whole idea, implemented over decades, is worth turning to the most precise science, to history. active promotion

of the green agenda began with the meeting of merg thatcher from the un podium in 1989. the greatest threat to our environment is the huge number of people and their accompanying plants and animals. when i was born, the population of the earth was about 2 billion people. my grandson will grow up in a world where more than 6 billion people live. to put it bluntly, the greatest threat to our environment is the growing number of people their activities. the lands they cultivate with increasing intensity, the forests they cut down and burn. the mountain slopes they strip bare, the fossil fuels they burn, the rivers and seas they pollute. as a result, the changes in the future will be more fundamental and far-reaching than anything we have known so far. why the iron lady suddenly cared about the environment, the answer lies in the full speech,

where she notes a significant warming of relations between the collective west and the soviet union. in fact, margaret thatcher states that the global evil with which they frightened their citizens has been successfully defeated, what can i say, she herself made a political career by criticizing the soviet leadership, 2 years after this speech the ussr will cease to exist at all, at this rate an ordinary englishman can inadvertently start looking around, asking unnecessary questions, and even worse, discussing them in the kitchen, mobilizing the electorate around a global invisible threat that affects everyone without exception, ideal option, which also allows you to earn good money and maintain global leadership. so why did western countries take on the fight against climate change? through this particular mechanism, through the fight against dependence on fossil fuels or dependence of industrial processes on fossil fuels, very

simply, because it gave two benefits: the first benefit is to reduce dependence on energy imported from far away, energy security, this is a good reason, quite a good reason, the second the reason is that new technological... innovations that need to be developed to produce energy not from fossil fuels, but from, say, renewable and other sources, or new industrial processes that need to be developed to do other work without using fossil fuels. basically, the country that they 're dealing with, that does this first, will have a technological advantage , not only will it create something that's beneficial for its own economy, but we 'll be able to provide a solution later on. here it is definitely worth noting that the growth of technological leadership, which my fellow countryman, a native of gomel, andrey

melnichenko, talks about, was not formed for everyone, that is, your belonging, for example, to the european union is far from a guarantee of a bright future, and sometimes even the opposite, for example, when joining the family of european nations, the lithuanians were forced to abandon their own nuclear energy, and this is not only green energy, but also a colossal scientific ... technical base, which they actually demanded to destroy, a similar situation with all the baltic countries, the showcase of the soviet union has been turned into a closet of the collective west, the region is gradually being driven into the stone age, the representative statistics are given by the member of the european parliament from latvia nilushakov. this year, all latvian universities, all latvian higher education institutions, with their joint efforts, were able to graduate exactly one physics teacher, one, physics for the whole country with all our customs for the development of the economy, industry and production. and this same year , more than 100 teachers have already been fired from latvian schools for the fact that they not well enough, they spoke latvian.

you know what? to say that our country is governed by people with serious mental retardation would actually be only a slight and insignificant exaggeration. such statistics do not even need any comments, and the conclusions are literally on the surface, but we do not criticize, everyone has their own. path of sovereign development, like it to your heart's content. we, in turn, are laying the foundation for the construction of the second nuclear power plant. the growing economy of belarus increases consumption every year electricity by more than 2.5 billion kilowatt-hours. at the same time, the operating station has made it possible to replace the consumption of about 9 billion m3 of natural gas since the launch of the first power unit. although, if we proceed from the new logic of the founder of greenpece, we have thus caused nature. repairable damage, the environment has not received such valuable carbon dioxide, it seems that i accidentally found another reason to impose sanctions against us. in fact, the rollback of the green

agenda in the western media is due to three reasons: firstly, it is urgently necessary to justify mothballed coal mines all over europe, and secondly , the technological race in green energy has completely failed. today, the main trends in this area are set by china. thirdly, it is becoming increasingly difficult to justify billions to citizens. for investments in the construction of new weapons factories, which literally smoke like coal locomotives. by the way, they tried not to talk about this before, practically the only world politician who openly raises the issue of hypocrisy in promoting the green agenda remains the president of belarus. in december 2023 year at the climate summit alexander lukashenko made a resonant statement, from which many had to lower their eyes to the floor. all the speakers, especially... the speakers from the speakers who spoke here first were concerned, where to get money? yes, the brostevs sitting here, even a journalist will tell you where

to get money, an example, to answer this question, you need to look into recent history, to destroy iraq and afghanistan and bring good to these countries for the peoples of... why is there no peace in this part of the planet today? because those speakers who spoke in the front rows talk about peace, talk about

the planet being. they are concerned about their grandchildren, at the same time they have unleashed and are waging the most terrible war on the planet, how much will the slaughter in the middle east cost, and if it breaks out in the pacific ocean, it is trillions and trillions of dollars, well, let's direct them to the cleanliness of the planet, and there will be no need to look for it, as we have... here on the coal this money, we have gathered here in order to once again express concern, and those who even here spoke in the first generations, concerned about grandchildren, they are waging these wars, and wars are a terrible pollution of the planet, let's stop it, instead of stopping wars, they have begun to breed them with great zeal all over the world, there really is no crime

that capital will not commit... 300% profit. the big game in the middle east has put the region on the brink of a nuclear confrontation, the thumbs up, not so much a sign of approval, as an opportunity to understand, whether you are at a safe distance. predicting the development of events in the middle east is an absolutely thankless task. at any moment, an airstrike or a ground attack can easily cross out any agreement, especially any. israel and iran continue to figure out who is the boss. the slap to tehran in the form of the murder of the leader of hamas ismail haniyeh simply cannot go unanswered, here the honor of the entire iranian people is affected, in the east such humiliation is not forgiven. iran has long arms in the form of proxies. they operate in many places, in

iraq, syria, lebanon, rules and prepared for this in advance. being in the united states simply decided to trample all the norms and in the states a few days before the next round of escalation, netanyahu demanded that the american congress create an analogue of nato in the middle east, against the threat from iran. when israel fights hamas, we fight iran, when we fight hezbollah, we fight iran, when we

fight the houthis, we fight iran, when we fight iran, we fight the most radical bloodthirsty enemy of the united states of america. only this time , few listened to the words of the israeli leader. even in washington, they understand that tel avi is not in the right position now and a defense alliance with israel is simply impossible. no one will want to do business with netanyahu after his aggression in the gaza strip. as experts note, if even one politician sits down with him at the same table, and even more so agrees on a military alliance, he will immediately become a traitor to 2 billion muslims around the world, and therefore the israeli prime minister now a lone wolf who wants war for only one purpose: to save himself by starting a global slaughter. now in the middle east only for netanyahu, as a benefit in the euro-atlantic now in europe, this is the conflict in

ukraine, and a little more about netanyahu's relations with the united states, various sources claim that biden in his last conversation with the israeli prime minister said that he was defending israel for the last time in the face of the iranian threat, but if tel aviv continues in its spirit, then let it blame itself. it is logical to assume that sleepy joe wants to retire with a relatively stable world picture, while it is unknown how the recent meeting of the israeli politician with trump ended. it is quite possible that he, on the contrary, promised to support the zionist government to the bitter end in the event of his victory. and therefore, now again much depends on the states and iran. a major war as

a result. tehran's attack is disadvantageous for the islamic republic, this will play into the hands of the republicans, for whom iran is the main enemy and will give the opportunity to accuse the democrats of another failure. if not, harris, as a direct. biden may well continue to bend his line, if elected to the post of head of the white house, he will still force israel to moderate its ardor to stop the bloodshed in gaza with all the consequences for the current government of the jewish state. another point of tension, which we cannot ignore for objective reasons, remains ukraine. official kiev is rapidly changing its rhetoric in favor of ending the conflict, theses about the borders of the ninety have disappeared from the agenda . the first year, and even zelensky in an interview with a french publication calls the renunciation of lost territories only a very difficult question. this is supported by the figures of ukrainian sociology, which in my opinion,

to put it mildly, are significantly underestimated, but still indicative. the majority of ukrainians surveyed (57%) were in favor of starting negotiations with russia. 38% of respondents were against. ukrainian political scientists note that the same public opinion figures were in the first months after the start of the conflict. let me remind you that at that time the current prime minister great britain boris johnson called kiev and forbade negotiations with russia. a row was organized to disrupt the dialogue. and in this regard, a natural question arises: how far will the new wave of peacekeeping rhetoric go? will there be another call? let's discuss this with military historian sergei pereslegin. sergei, a number of experts claim that the situation in ukraine. can be resolved without any serious breakdown, what do you think about this? i expect ukraine to make a final attempt to launch an offensive, for this offensive, ukraine has created new ones,

there is a very decent block of new aviation, yes, this is not an absolute weapon, but it is about eighty fairly new aircraft, which, of course, will change the situation in the air. the ukrainians expect to get, if not air supremacy, then neutralization of russia's air supremacy, while in the situation with drones, given that drones are quite easy to deliver to the front, and the entire west makes them, ukraine is even a little better than russia, in these conditions it can try to organize, can and should try, organize a major offensive, say so: in august, early september, apparently, in the summer she did not have time , after this offensive , peace negotiations will have to begin in any case, one way or another, if this offensive of ukraine fails, it is this probability of 90 percent,

but not 100 percent, of course, the ukrainian front of hands, if this offensive is successful, but in this case ukraine will have hope for a relatively sane one for itself. if the front collapses, i have already said, two main scenarios: the capitulation of ukraine on russian terms, and they are voiced by putin and are known, or the direct entry of the west into the war, but then, excuse me, the ukrainian front will be one of the fronts of the war, and most likely, far from the main one. by the way, if you are interested, the main thing at this moment will be the baltics. zelensky called the refusal to lose. territory just a very complex issue started talking about a referendum, in your opinion, what is behind this, is this an attempt to talk down the situation, or is it still a desire to make peace? the idea of ​​​​a referendum is quite decent and even a good move on the part of zelensky for

solutions to its domestic political problems. don't forget, for a long time, peace talks were banned in ukraine by law, and negotiations with russia in general,

nato generally recognizes that airfields are a legitimate target, but immediately says that, however, no one has cancelled the nato mutual assistance treaty, in the event of a strike on such airfields, nato will start a war with russia, and russia, for its part, assumes that a war with nato, since there are such conversations , is inevitable, and it is better to start it now, when nato book.

neither side of this war wants, neither russia nor nato, but both sides are ready to go to the end in this situation. sergey, thank you very much for your opinion, the sides are really ready to go to the end, the ukrainian battlefield with all the victims and human tragedies is far from the main direction for refraction of the efforts of global players. it is no secret to anyone that the transformation or even outright revision is going on by leaps and bounds.

a latin american country, that the usa is an african country or an asian country, a powerful state, uses the global role of its dollar to overthrow your government, for example, to replace it with some other.

many people still mistakenly associate the united states with unshakable stability, but in america itself, such optimism is felt by fewer and fewer citizens who are faced with objective reality expressed in dollar equivalent every day. i am in complete shock, scrolled through my purchase history at walmart and came across my order from two years ago. a grocery basket of 45 items cost me then 126 bucks, not one. for a month, then suddenly i see this button to repeat the order, i decided to see how much all this crap will cost now, so now these same 45 units of goods cost 414 dollars, that is, four times more, are you serious? think tanks in the us are sure that the country needs a reboot, the hegemony can

be restored through the transformation of the socio-political system. the question is only in the scenarios that have already been written and proposed for implementation. the most discussed are project 2025 and america 2050. the new bible american conservatives - 920 pages of text, which was worked on by dozens of think tanks and research groups under the general direction of the heritage foundation. project 2025 is an intellectual product that provides for a step-by-step reformatting of the us federal bureaucratic system. what we are doing is systematic preparation for taking office to create a new army of united, essentially armed conservatives ready to fight against the deep state. the strategic document is aimed at consolidating conservative values, including the elimination of lgbt propaganda in american schools,

restrictions on abortion and contraception, and the energy interests of the united states are prioritized over any international environmental agreements. in fact, we are talking about an agenda that donald trump actively promoted during his first presidential term. the deep state , politically engaged officials, are declared guilty of disrupting these plans, which means they are subject to replacement by a personnel reserve being formed from among conservatives. the civil service came into being at the turn of the 20th century, the idea being that a professional cadre could survive changes in administration. it is important to note that... at that time it was assumed that 10% of the total number of civil servants should have this protection, it was assumed that it should be based on personal merit, they should be functionaries who do not engage in politics, what has happened in the last 100 years is that this percentage has exceeded the 99% that

are now under permanent protection, that is, these people in key political positions cannot be removed by the president because of these protections, this... hinders democracy. the us has already started using project 2025 against donald trump, accusing him of preparing to strengthen presidential power after winning the election. the initiative to appoint loyal people to all departments is called nothing less than a shift towards autocracy. i would say that the legacy is trying to position itself in such a way as to broadcast hungarian ideas on how, having come to power, to remake the federal bureaucracy and the justice system to implement the will of the autocrat. the key to all this is the transformation of the republican party from a rather tough conservative party into a party promoting minority authoritarianism. at the moment, trump and his team disown the 2025 project and insist that they have nothing to do with it. the heritage foundation itself

calls its brainchild an attempt to revive conservative america. in their view, the plan meets the modern challenges that are facing. usa, i just want to cheer you up with something essential: we are in the process of a second american revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be so. the confrontation that is unfolding between the donkeys and elephants in the american china shop against the backdrop of ideological disagreements about the future of the state, indicate that the period of searching for compromises is far behind us, and the concept of 2050 looks much more relevant. it considers the possibility of the division of the united states into 11 independent macro-regions. american elections traditionally attract attention, because from the future of not only the united states depends on the results, but also their impact on other countries, after

the assassination attempt on trump and biden's removal from the race, the results are becoming almost unpredictable. let's discuss what's happening with political scientist dmitry novikov. how do you think the concept of american exceptionalism has affected the domestic political situation and the international situation. yes, well, the idea of ​​american exceptionalism, of course, is at the heart of american. interaction with the outside world, you can either self-isolate, that is, the outside world is something terrible, yes, we have

a paradise being built here, throughout the 19th century, accordingly the united states pursued an isolationist foreign policy, or if it becomes clear that it is no longer possible to fall out of the rest of the world, to isolate oneself from it, then it is necessary to transform the rest of the world in accordance with one's own. the idea is wonderful, and this is what the united states has been actively engaged in for most of the 20th century, well, in the last decades that we have all witnessed. here is trump, and trumpism, it is in some way to some extent, it is reviving this isolationist agenda, but of course, not in the form it was in the 19th century, let's isolate ourselves from everyone there, let's just not enter into significant political relations with anyone. let them do it themselves somehow, and we will cultivate our own paradise here, and no, like trump, we need to promote

democracy there, transform the world, we just need to be the strongest, if we are the strongest country in the world, everyone else will be afraid of us, which means, accordingly, we will be able to continue to build our little paradise, to be the best, the most exceptional, the most wonderful, yes, and no one else will be able to challenge us there. some experts predict that trump will withdraw from the presidential race, how do you assess this forecast? well, the prospects of donald trump withdrawing from the position of a presidential candidate still seem very far-fetched to me, this opinion arose there, well, to some extent after biden left the position of a candidate and leader of his party, but still. he was pushed aside in the course of a so-called small palace coup, and biden was pushed aside by his own party

due to the fact that his chances of winning were, frankly speaking, not very high, even by his own supporters , due to the fact that biden, apparently , began to lose at least some of his cognitive abilities, this was very clearly visible, including to voters, and... in the case of trump, the situation is fundamentally different. the republican party supports him, especially after the attempt.