this festival we are preparing our film time to return our film black castle here we have already translated the english subtitles, if we need to dub into hindi to enter the indian market, this is very important, you know, pakistan, sri lanka, there is a good field there, an unplowed field and today the film studio is working on a joint film with chinese partners, next week a delegation from the prc will arrive in minsk, they are not interrupting. russian project about father minai. and this is the information picture of monday, august 12. the evening on our channel will continue project "understandable policy". and here i say goodbye. all the best, happy. this is an understandable policy. hello. the western wing of the world, when the situation in one country or another develops not according to their scenario, turns on the barrel organ about human rights. and the main guardian. becomes the organization human

rights watch. on paper and in the right media, knights of truth and international law, but what really lies behind the supposedly good intentions, from us only the facts, the conclusions, you make.

let's start with azov. human rights watch on paper is non-governmental and of course, non-profit organization, positions itself as a private independent organization with headquarters in new york. the organization was founded in 1978 and monitors human rights in 70 countries around the world. this list includes belarus. the watch was founded by activists robert bernstein, jerry loveber and arrin neyer. the main goal of the organization is declared to be protection. of a person all over the world. the organization's website is full of beautiful words, the main goal is meticulously written: we protect everyone from everything, we are simply angels of political and public life. we help victims and activists prevent discrimination, to defend political freedom, to protect people from the cruelty of war, and to hold those responsible for violations accountable. we investigate and publicize human rights violations and hold those responsible to account. we demand that governments

stop violating and respect international human rights standards, and we mobilize the public and the international community to support the fight for human rights for all. we will not argue, it sounds noble, however, even the origins of the organization are thoroughly imbued with politics and struggle with the soviet union. in 1976 , robert bernstein visited academician sakharov and a number of other well-known russian human rights activists in moscow. many hours of conversations with them... led bernstein to the idea of ​​creating an organization in the united states that would provide systematic support to human rights activists in the soviet union. and indeed, two years after groups were created in moscow and then in other cities of the ussr in the spring of 1976 to monitor the implementation of the helsing accords by the soviet authorities in the area of ​​human rights (the third basket) robert bernstein created a human rights organization in new york called the us heelki watch committee. its mission was declared

to be the protection of human rights groups in the ussr and eastern european countries and support for their activities in publicizing the facts of human rights violations in these countries. in fact, this is simply an organization that, under the guise of being one of those who, in fact, are creating the possibility of organizing some kind of revolution, a color revolution, creating chaos , anarchy in one or another country, which, according to them, in the opinion of americans it is considered unfriendly to them. and the regimes that rule there in these countries should be immediately super-nutted, that's all, therefore you shouldn't count on the fact that human rights, watch, is really an organization, defended by human rights, it's just a beautiful fairy tale, and nothing more, there can be no talk of human rights there, it's just a screen that they hide behind, for this they receive huge sums of money, so they form the corresponding, that is, personnel, who then subsequently return to their countries, organize coups there. note in the ussr and eastern

europe. under this signboard initially hid something more interesting. during the cold war, the united states needed a political instrument. a little later, the helsinki committee would be renamed human rights watch. the helsinki accords provided for the obligation of all states to respect human rights in accordance with the universal declaration of human rights. thus, after the signing of the agreements by the soviet leadership, western partners had a completely legal an instrument of influence on the international arena. now interference in the internal affairs of the ussr has become quite. activity, the soviet leadership has lost the opportunity to expose this activity as subversive, carried out in the interests of the united states and other western states, because now human rights activists relied on a certain doctrine of universally recognized human rights. the annual budget is more than 70 million dollars,

but where the organization got and gets money is a separate topic. in the official documents of the watch it is written: we exist at the expense of private investors, we do not accept any assistance from governments. there are also many pitfalls here. in order to work for the benefit of individual countries, it is not necessary to receive direct tranches from the customer state, who said that private foundations and philanthropists, which human rights watch hides behind, do not obey the interests of america, we will prove this using the example of only the main sponsors. as a rule, donors remain in those, but... year one of them revealed his cards, the founder of the open society foundations, george soros, donated 100 at once million dollars of the largest grant of his structures, in order to expand the global presence, the same soros, on whom klim has no place for subversive actions against many countries. human rights watch is one of the most

effective organizations that i support, said soros. the contribution that hrw will receive from soros, the organization will use to ... hire new employees and expand its international network. today, new york-based hrw is represented in almost 70 countries around the world, and its staff numbers almost 300 people. of course, the good father of light revolutions did not invest in charity, but invested. after soros's donation, the watch's staff increased by 120 people, with special attention again to eastern europe and the middle east. and what is known about such a generous donor? in soros. since 1989, he has been openly engaged in political activity, assisting in the overthrow of inconvenient regimes. soros admits that the foundation he created in ukraine took direct part in the 2014 coup d'etat. soros's associate weinstein, head of the foundation

support of democracy, said: "today we are openly doing the same thing that 25 years ago the cia was forced to do secretly. is it any wonder, hungarian?" human rights, peace and democracy acquire an ideological charge in the hands of soros. democracy implies support for color revolutions in the countries of eurasia and impositions. the organization accepts 100 million dollars from a man who openly does not hide his geopolitical aspirations and who 10 years ago wanted to provoke europe into war against russia, here is an excerpt from his

articles. the european union must urgently wake up and start behaving like countries in a state of latent war. all available resources must be directed to military. efforts, even if this entails a budget deficit. later, the organization will predictably fail the ukrainian inspection, unlike the osce, human rights watch has not been caught spying for the ukrainian armed forces, but their reports are a separate type of fake art. a famous example is a photograph of a woman suffering from repression in moscow. human rights watch published a photo with this caption this photo on her social networks. it turned out later that the woman was really in shock. only from the arson of the trade union house.

monitoring the situation on the spot, and this is not accidental, these are not some shortcomings of this organization, the whole point is that ... human rights watch is not who they say they are, this organization has nothing to do with human rights activities, it is - so to speak, an element - an institute of struggle against our country. this is another of the largest donors of the organization, again american capital american ambitions. in 1966 president of the ford foundation. became mac george bundy, an ultra-hawk. according to contemporaries and historians, bundy came from the post

of director of the us national security council and chairman of the so-called 303 committee, which coordinated us secret operations around the world. the foundation worked as a proven tool for undermining various countries. in the late eighties, it launched projects to help civil institutions in the ussr, poland, hungary and czechoslovakia. for what purpose? well, of course, to promote. and economic reforms in these countries. from the beginning in the 1950s, the foundation allocated almost $100 million to support freedom of speech, cultural pluralism, and human rights in the soviet union and eastern europe. american and european democracies have created a huge number of non-governmental organizations to monitor foreign countries that they believe pose a threat to them and allegedly violate human rights. organizations.

private foundations in the united states with assets exceeding $6 billion. the stated goals include support for bright creative individuals and groups of people who contribute to the formation of a more just, environmentally friendly and safe world. in practice, everything is much more complicated. much more cynical interests are hidden behind the screen of verbal tricks. who managed the support of bright creative groups, international projects at the macarthur foundation from 2007 to... barry loncarne was in charge from the fourteenth years. previously, he worked in the national security council,

the department of defense, the national intelligence council and even the cia. since 1991, this fund actively financed organizations engaged in political activities in russia, in the fifteenth year was recognized as an undesirable organization. so human rights activists are in close contact with the authorities and capital. and it turns out that since the cold war, the americans have acquired such a tool that allows. to get into a foreign country under the false flag of a non-governmental organization, but the impudence of czechoslovakia prevails, sometimes they admit it themselves. hrw itself openly admits that it contributed to the coups in eastern europe and the ussr at the end of eighties, attacking the unwanted government through the media direct links with politicians. as a result, the struggle for human rights led to dramatic democratic transformations in the late eighties. thus, non-governmental... the united states, which consisted in

the idea of ​​destroying the ussr as an evil empire. as oleg popov claimed, for 20 years, participating in the human rights movement, hrw assumed the functions of information and propaganda support for diplomatic, economic and military intervention of nato countries, the first it's the turn of the united states, in the internal affairs of other countries. the statement of the head of human rights immediately comes to mind. the ability of the belarusian ministry of information to block access to information sites. at that time, the us law on foreign agents, through

which washington banned media, had existed for more than 70 years. the organization constantly criticizes the belarusian electoral system, large political companies in our country. no matter how they go, it constantly voices hackneyed cliches regarding the alleged purge of civil society, torture and persecution of opponents without presenting any evidence. also surprisingly repeats almost verbatim the old song of opposition and extremist persons, en masse, calling people who broke the law, political prisoners. another interesting case, criticism. from human rights watch for these words of the president. i call this coronavirus nothing other than psychosis and i will never give it up, because together with you i have already experienced many psychoses, and we know what this led to. i am absolutely convinced that this is another psychosis of the same kind, which will be beneficial to some and harmful to others. but we

live in a specific situation and, naturally, we must proceed from the situation that is developing not only in our country, but also outside our country. why am i acting this way? because i am absolutely convinced that we can suffer more from panic than from the virus itself. throughout the pandemic, president lukashenko has ignored the seriousness of covid-19. the authorities have not introduced any localization measures, despite the high level of infection transmission among the population, the authorities of minsk and a number of other cities. demanded to wear masks in public places, the authorities tried to silence medical workers who spoke about the dangers of the pandemic. of course, human rights activists made such statements out of habit in absentia, apparently reading the news feeds of extremists. in hindsight, many admit that belarus is one of the few countries that has gone through the coronavirus pandemic worthy. belarus is today perceived as virtually

the only country in classical old europe that people of that formation still remember. 40 years ago in the sense that yes, this is in fact the same european country with its own views on life, with its own interests, the ability to protect its own, that is, rights, that is, its sovereignty and defend its national interests, this is all the merit of the belarusian leader alexander lukashenko, who is trying to fight them one way or another , to show and defend the position of belarus to the whole world. this is the kind of patrol or guards of our rights, extremely selective, to be a speck in the eye belarus, russia and china are not able to see, for example, the crime of ukraine or israel, we are silent about the pentagon, it turns out that it is not so sighted, what to say about the main donor of the usa, there, according to human rights watch, as in western europe,

it is nothing more than a paradise garden. hrw's assertion that it exists exclusively on private. all work. by a strange coincidence , issues of human rights protection are dealt with exclusively by career employees of the us security and intelligence services. this applies to the sponsors of the organization. the conclusion suggests itself it is quite obvious that these and other human rights activists are nothing more than a convenient tool of influence, capable of confusing people's minds, slandering them on

command, when the customer needs it. the hawk's big capital group has been pursuing only one american goal for many years. to undermine, overthrow, and subjugate stubborn countries. remember this when you see the next reports, including those on belarus. good luck!