the next donor is a private family foundation, again registered overseas, one of the top ten largest private foundations in the us with assets exceeding $6 billion. the stated goals include support for outstanding creative individuals and groups of people who contribute to the formation of a more just, environmentally friendly and safe world. in practice, everything is much more complicated. behind the screen of verbal adventures lie much more cynical interests. who managed the support of outstanding creative groups by international projects at the macarthur foundation from 2007 to 14 years was led by barry loncarn. previously, he worked in the national security council, the department of defense, the national intelligence council and even the cia. since 1991, this fund has actively financed organizations engaged in political activities in russia, in the fifteenth year it was recognized as an undesirable organization. so human rights activists. in close connection with the authorities

and capital, it turns out that since the cold war, the americans have acquired such a tool that allows them to get into a foreign country under a false flag non-governmental organization, but the impudence of czechoslovakia prevails, sometimes they admit themselves. hrw itself openly admits that it contributed to the coups in eastern europe and the ussr in the late eighties, as well as the unwanted government through the media direct connections with politicians. as a result, the fight for human rights. led to dramatic democratic transformations in the late eighties. thus, the non-governmental organization participated in the implementation of the official us foreign policy doctrine, which consisted in the idea destruction of the ussr as an evil empire. as oleg popov claimed, for 20 years, participating in the human rights movement, hrw took on the functions of information and propaganda support for diplomatic, economic and military. called for bombing syria to protect

civilians, the comment is unnecessary, i suggest dwelling on our country in more detail, the relations between minsk and human rights watch are exactly the same as those of belarus and the united states. over the years, the watch has accused us of unprecedented repression, infringement of freedom of speech, and such rhetoric impartial in quotes of the organization, persisted long before the events of 2020. for example, in 2016, belarus came under criticism for the ability of the belarusian ministry of information to block access to information sites. at that time , the us law on agents, through which washington and sent media to the ban, existed for more than 70 years. the organization

constantly criticizes the belarusian electoral system major political campaigns in our country, no matter how they are held, constantly voices hackneyed cliches in relation to the alleged purges of civil society, torture , persecution of opponents, without presenting any evidence, and also surprisingly repeats, in fact, word for word, the old song of opposition and extremist persons. en masse, calling people who broke the law, political prisoners. another interesting case, criticism. from human rights watch for these words of the president: i call this coronavirus nothing other than psychosis and i will never give it up, because together with you i have already experienced many psychoses, and we know, to what this led to, i am absolutely convinced that this is another such psychosis, which will be to someone's advantage, and to someone's advantage in time, but we live in a specific situation and naturally must proceed from the situation that ...

is developing not only in our country, but outside our country. why am i acting this way? because i am absolutely convinced that we can suffer more from panic than from the virus itself. throughout the pandemic, president lukashenko ignored the seriousness of covid-19. the authorities did not introduce any localization measures, despite the high level of transmission of infection among the population. the authorities of minsk and a number of other cities. demanded to wear masks in public places, the authorities tried to silence medical workers who spoke about the dangers of the pandemic. of course, human rights activists made such statements out of habit in absentia, apparently reading the news feeds of extremists. in hindsight, many admit that belarus is one of the few countries that has survived the coronavirus pandemic worthy. belarus is today perceived as virtually the only country of the classic old europe, which people still remember there formations.

forty-fifty years ago in the sense that yes, this is in fact the same european country with its own views on life, with its own interests, the ability to protect its own and therefore rights, and therefore its sovereignty and defend its national interests, this is all the merit of the belarusian leader alexander lukashenko, who is trying to fight them one way or another, to show to defend , therefore, the position of the belarusian world. this is such a patrol or guards of our rights, extremely electoral, they don’t know how to find a petty thing in the eyes of belarus, russia and china, but to see, say, a crime in... ukraine or israel, let’s not even mention the pentagon, it turns out that they are not so sighted. what can we say about the main donor of the usa, there, according to human rights watch, as in western europe, it is nothing more than a paradise garden. hrw’s assertion that it exists solely on private donations conceals the real picture

of what is happening. the usa, human rights activists, big capital and power are inextricably linked by lobbying ties, which has been recognized by western researchers. in their opinion, hrw's close ties with the us authorities disqualify its claims to independence. what kind of independence can there be when there is such a connection with the american authorities. human rights watch should be called a subsidiary fund of the local elite. and if you change the first letter in the word "watch", you can get a capacious description of the entire work. by a strange coincidence , human rights issues are dealt with exclusively by career employees of the us security and intelligence services. this applies to x. the sponsor of the organization. the conclusion suggests itself, quite obvious: these and other human rights activists are nothing more than a convenient tool of influence, capable of confusing people's minds and slandering them on command, when the customer needs it. the hawk's big capital group has been pursuing only one american goal for many years:

to undermine, overthrow, and subjugate stubborn countries. remember this when you see the next reports, including those regarding belarus. good luck. participant in a defensive border battle in belarus. in august 1941, he was recalled from the front and sent to the enemy's rear with

task of developing the partisan struggle in the veli region. from september 1941 he became the commander of the partisan special group. the brigade under his command.

degrees: streets in many belarusian settlements are named after him. in the city of molodechno there is a park and a street named after markov, on which a bust of the hero is installed.

slavgorod is located in a beautiful place, the confluence of two rivers, pronya and sosh, here is also the ancient settlement of zamkovaya gora and ... a magnificent landscape park, well, i feel quite comfortable on this throne, don't be afraid, when you go out, you won't be cold, oh, oh! oh, oh, i can't feel my legs, i'm just, i'm already worried, to be honest, oh, it's already starting, wait, come on, that's cool, right, you're ready, i, of course, so what, how are you, it's great there, i want to go again. travel with the belarus 24 tv channel.