just respect. the skin is stored traditionally. senny year albo stagodze tamu, everything that was considered old was kalistsi new. we ourselves do not respect this; we pass on our knowledge and experience directly. this is our smile, the wave of our hand, and with such a familiar pose from simple, happy moments , we formulate our own traditions, we are committed to the decline of our products. we appreciate the past for our

today. belarus 24.

as we know in the wild, the light shines on the earth, all the humming atmospheres are known, and only the wind blows the sand of the ear, when you woke up and understood what kind of vocals are. at every turn.

this vocals jump in harmony with nature belarus 24. hello, the sas program is on air, i am its host. nadezhda sas, i welcome you, i remind you that this program is for those who want to better understand what is happening and understand how these processes, events, people will affect the life of the country of each of us. we will talk in more detail about the threat of a major war in the middle east immediately after the digest of key events in world politics this week. bangladesh - revolution. prime minister sheikhasina, who led the country for 20 years , resigned and fled abroad amid mass protests that escalated into chaos in the country with

the formation of an interim government, which will be headed by nobel laureate muhammad yunus. recall that the protests in bangladesh began in early july. initially, they were attended by students who demanded a change in the essence. in the country, the quota system, which reserves 30% of public sector jobs for relatives of war veterans for independence from pakistan. clashes between protesters and supporters of the quota system soon began, then, when police and the military tried to disperse the protesters, the protests turned into riots. the supreme court overturned most of the quotas on july 21, but protests continued, with participants demanding an investigation into the violence against demonstrators and... a state of emergency was declared in the kursk region on thursday, and massive attacks by the ukrainian armed forces on the korsk region began on the morning of august 6. according to local authorities, this at the time

, a thousand-strong ukrainian unit crossed the border, treacherously attacking civilian targets. the russian defense ministry reported that about 300 ukrainian soldiers attacked russian positions near the settlements. oleshnya and nikolayeva dar'ina, for this they used 11 tanks and more than twenty armored combat vehicles. the operation to destroy the ukrainian armed forces in the border areas of the kursk region continues, the russian defense ministry said in a statement. units of the north group of troops together with the russian fsb, they continue to destroy armed formations of the ukrainian armed forces in the sudensky and korenevsky districts of the kursk region, which are directly adjacent to the russian-ukrainian border. matthew miller, head of the press service of the us state department, said that the united states does not impose restrictions on the use of american weapons by the ukrainian armed forces in the kursk region. he emphasized that ukraine's actions do not violate us policy. miller also said that the american administration was not

warned about the planned attack by the ukrainian armed forces on korda region. he noted that such information is part of ukraine's specific tactics, and this is not unusual. the united states provides equipment and advice. but ukraine makes the decision on actions independently. us vice president kamala harris, the official democratic party candidate in the presidential election , announced that if she wins in november , minnesota governor tim wolf, 60, will become vice president. some time after the news appeared , the press secretary of the election headquarters, former us president donald trump, caroline leavitt called the governor dangerously liberal. and accused him of being obsessed with promoting a liberal agenda, like most american governors, walls has rarely spoken out on foreign policy issues, his positions do not differ much from the party majority. so in october 2023, he condemned the attack of the radical palestinian

group hamas on israel. at the same time, walls expressed understanding of the position of protesters against israel's strikes on the gaza strip, which lead to the deaths of civilians residents. in his recent column, russian international affairs scholar fyodor lukyanov writes about the crisis in the middle east: the situation in western asia, where the wills of iran and israel have once again clashed, is paradoxical in that there is no way out of the clinch. the parties really want to sort things out with each other, but it is impossible to do so without catastrophic consequences for themselves. we will talk about the latest sharp steps in this protracted macabre dance of two inseparable enemies in today's program. welcome to our studio.

alexander borisovich, please, i think that the threat remains, a large degree of uncertainty, the whole point is that the human factor can intervene, well , political contingency, we see that benjamin netanyahu wants to drag

the united states of america into this conflict in every possible way, very often he acts not only against the interests of the rest of the world, but also against the interests of the united states, it may well turn out that the states can...

he faces prison. let me remind you that the situation in

the middle east has worsened due to the attack on the head of the palestinian hamas politburo ismail haniyeh in central tehran, iran blamed israel for the incident, promising a swift and tough response. tel aviv warned that tehran would pay a high price if it attacked the jewish state. we will tell you the details in our story. the assassination of the hamas leader threatens to escalate tensions. in the middle east, the head of the palestinian politburo ismail haniyeh was killed on july 31 as a result of a missile strike on his residence in tehran. he was there the occasion of the inauguration of iranian president masoud pesishkian. hamas blamed israel and the united states for the murder, while in israel itself the topic remains closed. ministers are prohibited from speaking out about haniyeh's death. the radical movement said it reserves the right to take a harsh response to the murder. hamas stressed that haniyeh's death will not affect the movement's position in the negotiation process with israel, but

the jewish state will nonetheless pay a high price for the crime. iranian authorities are investigating, but have already now experts agree that the murder of the politburo leader threatens to escalate tensions in the middle east, any attempts to resolve the situation are immediately under threat. the negotiations between the parties have been extremely difficult in recent months, they could not even agree on a temporary cessation of a... now the situation has become even more complicated, the liquidation of haniya threatens the lives of the hostages to a greater extent, today there are more than 100 people, the israeli army is having an extremely difficult time rescuing its fellow citizens, while the pressure on the government in this regard does not weaken, crowds of local residents regularly take to the streets of israeli cities, demanding that their relatives and friends be brought home. whether this will be done in the near future is an open question, since a number of experts even predict... the outbreak of a full-scale war in the region, analysts are only competing in forecasts of when exactly

the retaliatory blow will occur, some believe that revenge is served cold, others are sure that iran will not wait. in the global media space there is an opinion that iran may take measures against israel in the very near future, in particular, this was stated by the american media , citing officials. and here, karennaya aleksandrovna, we are accustomed to the fact that israel and iran are the worst enemies, but in this confrontation.

does not exist, and now at this time iran has created its own axis of resistance, has very serious positions in iraq, lebanon, syria, and as we have seen, helps ansarul in yemen and in this sense the task of the iranians is to ensure maximum security own country, which, i will remind you, has, unlike israel.

including the negotiation process on the part of iran, it turns out, with the mediation of egypt and qatar on the regulation of this catastrophic situation in gaza, he was one of the key negotiators, and this person is being eliminated, even if israel denies its participation, but i think that much, if not everything, indicates that it is israel that is involved in the elimination of officials of this level. moreover, continuing the topic of ideology, if we look. who became the successor of the liquidated khania, it was ihyasenvar, so immediately, as soon as he took over the post of the murdered khania, then none other than the minister of foreign affairs of israel, israel katz, declared that this person was subject to immediate liquidation, physical liquidation, because

he was a threat to the organizer of the attack on israel on october 7 last year, we have prepared a small information note. and mr. sinwar, so pay attention to the screen. yahya sinwar, the newly elected the head of the hamas politburo, considered one of the most significant and radical figures in the movement. he is the organizer of the hamas attack on israel on october 7, 2023. for the kidnapping of two israeli soldiers, he was sentenced by israel to four life sentences, of which he served 22 years. in 2011, he was released as a result of a prisoner exchange, and in 2017 he was elected leader of the movement. in the gaza strip 3 years ago, he was subject to an assassination attempt by israel, since november 2023 he has been under sanctions by the uk and the us, and on may 20, 2024 year, the prosecutor of the international criminal court , karim khan, requested a warrant for his arrest. yes, nikolai petrovich, but it is important to consider how it was done, how khanie was destroyed,

that is, it was a deliberate signal to iran from israel. yes, it was a deliberate signal to iran. but the signal is quite crude, because, you know, there is such a saying: the east is a delicate matter, if you look at the circumstances under which khanie was destroyed, because he was at the inauguration of the newly elected iranian president, he was a guest in iran at that time, because he permanently resided in turkey and kator, if i am not mistaken, at this moment iran is being insulted in this way by israel, that is , it is absolutely clear that iran, in response... is appointing a much more radical, much tougher figure to replace the person who, i repeat, could well have organized the negotiation process to de-escalate this situation. if we look at the situation from iran's point of view, iran is guided by national interests, security interests. iran is on the defensive. if we look at

the position of israel, the issue there is not only in the gaza strip. the issue is not only in the attack that took place on october 7, yes, of course, this topic now overshadows all the others, but i think everyone remembers that 2 years ago, for example, there were mass protests in israel due to the unsuccessful judicial reform, yes, that is , the domestic political positions of benjamin netanyahu, they are extremely, extremely shaky, that is why he is going for escalation at any cost, and i will note that the president of belarus alexander lukashenko fears that the united states will use the conflict in the middle east to unleash a new world war, about this... the russian leader said at a meeting with participants of the session of the council of ministers of internal affairs of the member states of the commonwealth of independent states. it seems that the policy of the united states of america has been built. in the world over the past 4 years under the current president, it is certain, these friends, these enemies, this son of a bitch, but ours is a stranger, the government

will change, it will be like in afghanistan, it will definitely be, this is not the first time, in order to change the government, they definitely need to unleash some kind of war, god forbid, they use the conflict situation in the middle east to unleash a new world war, they are ready to do this too. aleksandrevich, we often say that globalists are interested in destabilizing the middle east, but in practice we are now seeing how the biden administration is making great efforts to put out the fire that is being actively fanned by the far-right netanyahu government, that is, there is even a certain confrontation today in certain goals and visions of what is happening between israel and the united states the states of america. i think that the united states, perhaps, is one of the... the least interested in this matter, they have an election campaign on their shoulders, and the development of a major war in the middle east, clearly will

not be in favor of the candidate of the democratic party, they will deal with iran after they take power, now it is obvious, they have ukraine hanging on their hands, in addition, the question is that they are diverting significant forces, forces from taiwan. it turns out that they are drawn into a number of local conflicts around the world, the united states can no longer respond, so to speak, adequately to all these, to all these challenges and threats, so i think that the united states will make efforts until the last moment to prevent this war, which is generally looming quite clearly on the horizon, and i think that the russian federation is also against such a development of events, they say that shoigu is... in order to, so to speak, sell iran air defense systems to familiarize themselves with the position of the russian federation on the ukrainian issue, but, as some experts say,

the russian federation has urged iran not to rush into a military conflict, and at least to wait until iran's air defense is reinforced with the latest russian anti-missile and air defense systems, so, apart from benjamin. netanyahu, i think even the most extreme reactionaries in israel are not interested in this conflict, because well, the time allotted for the existence of the state of israel is thawing, from a long-term perspective, the chances preservation of the state long-term pensions are melting. karina aleksandrovna, do you agree with this position and do you associate iran's recent decision, because... tirana is considering changing tactics, abandoning its initial plans for a massive attack on israel, the politics publication writes, citing sources. according to the publication, the us believes that tehran

has already made the appropriate decision and does not expect a blow to the european state in the near future, and there was a corresponding visit mr. shaigu, that is, international actors contributed to the fact that there was no response from iran. well, i will start with the fact that the speaker of the lower house of the american parliament, mr. johnson, said that if iran strikes, the united states will declare war on iran, which means that in these circumstances the elections may be postponed altogether, in this case it is quite curious that johnson is playing for haris, even, so to speak, here a. nevertheless, the iranian leaders did not agree with this, the blow must still

be a blow of retaliation, the question is about its scale, and nevertheless, that is, none of the intermediaries, neither qatari, nor turkish, nor british, nor french, anyone, managed to dissuade the iranians, another thing is that it is curious that... the americans nevertheless found themselves in tehran by secret means, they conducted negotiations and apparently discussed some issues. let me remind you that the americans themselves have some small dependence on iran, they conducted negotiations on the purchase of enriched uranium and with the iranian leadership, because they themselves do not enough, they buy from us, they want, apparently, to reduce purchases - enriched uranium and from russia and even here...

we see there a swan, a crayfish and a pike, which of them, let's say, will provoke - today's american leadership to participate in military operations, well, that's a big question, as they say, someone can do it, there are interested parties, and we, i see how the same statements, for example, from london testify to the fact that war is war, they don't really want to drag the united states into this

war. they have their own ambitions, their own desire to recolonize the united states, throughout apparently we are witnessing how the fight for the american inheritance begins, by analogy remember the fight for the spanish inheritance in its time. i am grateful to you, karina alexandrovna, for participating in the program, and nikolai petrovich, please tell me, what do you think, taking into account the position voiced by korina alexandrovna, that is, today, you know. as we love to dig into conspiracy theories and assume who is interested in this or that conflict, that is, it seems that the situation is completely uncontrollable, and what the outcome will be, just as for us, again it is impossible to guess, on the other hand, is there then an opportunity to improve relations between states, because in the diplomatic plane there is no decision yet, well, you know, regarding that, it is easier to answer the question

of how all this will end in the event of escalation, it is clear that it will end, well, at least in regional chaos in the middle east, and no one will undertake to predict its duration in a time period, there it could drag on for at least a decade, so how can this situation be resolved, well , in fact, i would venture to suggest that with very serious, but categorically joint... consistent efforts on the part of the russian federation, the people's republic of china and the united states of america, this is the kind of triangle that i don't remember successfully working, at least in this region, but if we try to launch a peacekeeping mechanism, forget about any disagreements, about sympathies, antipathies, because we know that the united states has now sent an aircraft carrier strike group to the mediterranean, obviously to support israel, and this is

obviously against uranus. if we abstract from all this, then it is quite possible, quite possible, that some kind of agreement can be reached, but i would make a small note here in terms of a hypothetical military, or rather, i am even now mistaken, not necessarily a military response from iran, because iran proclaimed how, it said that it would respond as needed, whereas it is necessary, and where it is necessary, this does not necessarily mean that 300 missiles will fly at israel, as... it happened, we know, on april 14 of this year, yes, in response to the israeli air strike on the iranian consulate in syria, it could be a proxy war, it could be the houthis, who can seize or sink any ship that, let's say, supplies israel, it could be the hezbollah movement, which will strike at israeli territory, by the way, by the way, practically synchronously with the destruction of the leader of the hamas politburo.

ismail hani was also destroyed one of the military leaders of hezbollah, shukr, he was destroyed in the same way, hezbollah has the motivation to do this, that is why for iran in this situation, the so -called proxy war is much more profitable than waving its fists, that is, formally, it saves face and does not go for escalation. the only country that is going for escalation today, we have already said many times, is israel. therefore, therefore, it is necessary to influence, the efforts of the international community on peacekeeping should be directed specifically at israel. we see on the screen a map that my colleagues and i prepared, the iran influence group in the middle east. friendly countries, neutral countries, hostile countries are highlighted in different colors, so that it is clear to our esteemed viewers. alexander borisovich, but such inaction is surprising even from those states that are in fairly

friendly relations with iran. that is, israel told the middle east who is currently the boss here, whose hands are untied, that is, when you take a certain action, if it. contradicts the norms of world politics of international relations, you can assume that there will be punishment for this, but for israel there is no punishment, what do you think, why? i think that everyone is waiting, and those who are on the side of israel, and those who are on the side of iran, everyone is waiting for the development of the situation, because it is unknown how events will develop further, both of these countries have significant military potential, said more... israel warned that any hostile actions by its neighbors will be brutally suppressed, up to and including strikes on the largest centers, that is, both industrial and military,

so everyone is waiting, waiting, on whose side, as they say, there will be a military advantage, and i think that iran has adopted the tactic of, well, revenge, this is a dish that should be served cold. they are now calculating the options, i do not agree that the matter can be limited to proxy operations, iran must show a clear answer of its own, because this is its authority not only among its own population, but also in the entire muslim world, so it should be emphasized precisely as an iranian response. the question of how to carry out this strike so that it would be effective in terms of information is very loud. iran cannot be fully covered by air defense and missile defense systems. i think that

everyone is still waiting for a step from the outside, from iran, how will it act? and here experts put forward many options, that is, that there could be a raid on israeli territory by iranian teams, what is this? the united states, a campaign from, as a colleague said, china, the russian federation, the question is very complicated, we are talking about the ideology of prestige, so of course, iran cannot give in to anything in this. let me remind you, i am authorized to declare on the air of the saz program. we are talking about the threat of a major war in the middle east. i am adding to our broadcast igor aleksandrovich matveyev, associate professor of the department of international

business - faculty of international economic relations of the financial university under the government of the russian federation. greetings. hello. well, we have a map of the middle east before our eyes.

israel and iran, yes, well, so far it fits into the mainstream of the paradigm of strategic patience on the part of tehran, which in general in fact actually means a proxy war using militarized. allied to itself in the zone of the so-called shiite crescent, yes, but this term was introduced into circulation by the arabs in their time, this is actually, yes, countries such as iran itself, then iraq, syria, lebanon with access to the border with israel, so all these conflicts they have a tendency not just to escalate, yes, but to an increase in interdependence, plus there are also extra-regional conflicts, in general. connected yes, so here, unfortunately, we cannot say that there are no risks of a major conflict, a major war. igor aleksandrovich, i would also like to discuss with you the new leader of iran, the new president of iran,

masoud, we have prepared a small reference, let's look at it and then discuss it in more detail. masoud pesishkian, the president of iran, who won the early elections. and an ethnic azerbaijani, gained over 16 million votes, that is, almost 55% of the total number of voters. pesishkian is considered a supporter of more liberal course in domestic policy. in particular. advocated for greater freedoms for women. in relations with the west, pezishkian adheres to a pragmatic and constructive foreign policy. he believes that overcoming anti-iranian sanctions is possible through negotiations with the united states and the european union. as for russia, his position is not fundamentally different from the approach of his predecessor. it is expected that in the near future the course of rapprochement between the two countries will continue. we have just looked at the information about the new president of iran based on the data biographical, his political position,

the absolutely brutal actions of israel against iran, do you think they were aimed at driving a wedge between iran and the united states of america, because, based on the position of the new president of iran, one could assume that the relationship would be close to establishing a mutually beneficial existence. regardless of who is the president of iran, but of course, yes, in the case of the new president, the priorities of the foreign policy of the islamic the republics of iran remain the same and one of the most key priorities is the weakening, ideally the lifting of the cancellation of anti-iranian sanctions, the first of course from the united states, because from other countries, well, in many ways these sanctions are limited. this is due to the imperative

of ensuring guaranteed technological sovereignty, scientific sovereignty, that is , obtaining with obtaining sustainable access to the achievements of scientific and technological progress, this is very important for the iranians, it is clear that the israelis are trying to disrupt the process of normalizing possible relations between iran and the united states based on reaching an agreement on the iranian nuclear program, and naturally, there have been many leaks that biden would like to do this before the end of his presidency in order to go down in history as a successful president, this is very important to him, the americans, as i understand it, are ready to make certain concessions here, the fact that the leader of iran has become a person who is known in the west as a reformer, this is generally such a subjective factor, its importance should not be overestimated, but in general it really is... circumstances, probably, under certain conditions of acceleration

of the normalization process, the israelis, of course, are not happy with this, because in such a case the risks for them increase from the point of view of their security, the way the israelis understand it, therefore they do, they do everything to irritate iran, to force it to take steps not in line with the concept of strategic patience, which is sanctioned by the rahbar, the supreme leader iran, of course, and... continues to firmly adhere to this doctrine of strategic patience, the israelis are playing on this in every possible way pushing iran so that it would begin to take more decisive actions, in order to then involve the united states in possible strikes against iran, in order to disrupt the process of normalizing iranian-american relations, this is one of the priorities for israel. i continue to remain a limited optimist from the point of view that the iranians are unlikely to be ready to sharply break.

russia, why do the actions of israel evoke applause from the united states of america, while the actions of russia are condemned? well, it is clear that in the public opinion of the collective west , the russian federation is presented as an aggressor, which has carried out an attack on... a democratic state, which is drifting towards the west, which is trying to join the international community of civilized countries, and of course, from this point of view of the attack.

britain, which is really fueling this conflict, which has absolutely its own interest, which dreams of taking the positions that the united states is now losing, everything that contributes to such a development of events, great britain only supports, throwing wood on the fire, therefore, in the foreseeable future, the relations of the collective

west, the conflict in ukraine in palestine. will change, i think that now the russian federation will fight to further strengthen the sympathy for itself from the global south, to attract as many countries as possible that occupy some other wavering uncertain position in relation to the special military operation, in this direction will act both economically and military-technically and diplomatically. i agree with you, nikolay petrovichno. you see, the world is really at a loss and none of the players can predict how this tragic situation for many will end, but it can be noted that there were such opinions in the expert community, and it is beneficial for russia that the middle east is in flames, and it is beneficial for the globalists, but in fact we see what

reaction from the leadership of the russian federation, shaigu's visit to tehran, the desire to prevent truly horrific. terrible consequences, and the biden administration realized that provocations will not feed you, that is, there is a certain adequate perception of what is happening. yes, well, this narrative that it is beneficial for russia for the middle east to burn, where does it come from, after all , it is mainly western countries that are throwing it, and why is elementary, because they measure by themselves, they simply project their measure onto us, that it is beneficial to them, then automatically, as they think, it is beneficial to us, why? because it distracts from ukraine, supposedly, yes, they think in this category, and continuing the topic of comparing the israeli situation with the ukrainian one, i would just compare israel, just not with russia, but with ukraine of the fourteenth, twenty-second year, what it did on the territory of donbass, this is approximately the same, well, on a large

scale, probably, what israel is doing today in relation to the gas sector, by the way, there is such, well, probably, a conspiracy theory, i won’t take it upon myself to claim that it is the ultimate truth, but what is the final task of israel, which, well, probably has been in the air since the prime ministership of ishak rabin, after all, it consists in, in principle, evicting the gaza strip, in general, in principle, resettling the palestinians to the sinai peninsula, no matter how fantastic it sounds, why fantastic, well, because in peacetime how can this be done with a bulldozer or something, no, a...

i do you a favor, the thing is that if the new president of iran was really set on some kind of liberalism, on some kind of disclosure of his foreign policy, a reduction in hostile rhetoric, on de-escalation and so on, but when during the first week he gets hit on the head with a hammer like this right away, and in the form of the murder of a high-ranking figure, i think that well, if we can’t put a period on his liberalism, but at least he will think very hard about whether he needs it? i agree with the experts in this regard, who are critical of such liberal ideas, so in principle it is possible that israel has achieved that foreign policy, global, uh, goal of separating the united states of america and iran, yes, so that they do not get closer, so that everything remains as it was, perhaps it has really achieved this with its actions, but in the medium term in

the regional context israel has done itself a lot of harm, because iran will now definitely take a defensive position. igor aleksandrovich, and you see chance for a comprehensive settlement of the conflict? because we talked today. in voskarena gevorgian orientalist, she believes that any attempts to settle the diplomatic plane, they are naturally destroyed by israel, he said his, clear no, in fact, their paradigm of reconciliation of the middle east on a monetary basis with the help of the dollar suffered a complete fiasco, that is, initially, that it was assumed that there would be no state of palestine, but that there would be access for palestinians to big money.

india, this is india, the middle east, europe, so here is the connection, that is, saudi arabia, israel, palestine - this is, so to speak, a key link, transit, actually, this is very important, that is, in understanding... here they really judge by themselves, if the palestinians really got a piece of the pie, that is, not in words, in fact, not to mention the neighboring arab states, the same external economic dependence of egypt is growing, yes, which for the sake of sustainable development goals, so to speak, uses funds from international financial organizations, that is, all this in a complex, yes, it is precisely comprehensive, it will give a long-term measurement of the middle east, a comprehensive settlement based on the formula. states is also unrealistic for now, which means that while the netanyahu government is definitely in power, and netanyahu is experiencing pressure from

even more right-wing forces that insist on an even tougher defense of israel's interests, primarily security, i draw attention to the fact that in the event of the creation of any palestinian state , the strategic depth, which already exists, will be completely lost is absolutely small,

which cares about the fate of citizens and its own and also of another state in every possible way gives a signal to ukraine that there is an opportunity to sign a peace agreement, the question is different: ukraine is not ready to do this, but we need to live in this multipolar world that is being built before our eyes, the question is how these conflicts can be resolved in your opinion, well, generally speaking, i just now had this idea come to mind, sad, so now we have ricocheted onto such a global topic as... unfortunately, degradation the united nations, because such issues, of course, should be resolved by such a structure as the security council, its

decision is mandatory for implementation, well, in such cases, at least for sure, the resolution should be unquestioningly implemented, in the worst case, stop the conflict, and in general, in the best case, prevent it and stop it at an early stage, this does not happen, the united nations, alas, alas, has lost its authority, so what are the options for joint peacekeeping work between the leading... in the region, but the leading players, whether someone likes it or not, were and remain, the united states of america, the russian federation, the people's republic of china, well, it probably makes sense to include turkey here, and egypt, egypt already provides mediation services, well, but what should be the vector of these efforts, because it is clear that, well, at least for today, persuading iran not to do anything at all, in response to the murder of a political activist. territory is also not an easy task, here it was right it is said, he will not lose his face, he is obliged to answer, this is also a kind of humiliation, to leave these actions

unanswered, but at least people are ready to talk, at least there. is set up for dialogue, if we consider the situation related to ukraine, throughout this conflict we see the presence of states, peacekeepers, which is the republic of belarus, we see the efforts of mr. orban, that is, the position of hungary, china, then it is felt that the east is a delicate matter and most of the players are in the position observers and decide not to interfere, that is , they correct the actions of enemies, and hostile states. at the moment, so as not to bring the whole world to the point of ruin, but on the other hand, they understand that time will judge, the whole point is that you can't just look at the external counter-situation, you have to pay attention to the fact that hamas has a social base inside the palestinian nation, and if we look, then the total

number of palestinians in the world according to data for the twenty. year is 14-15 million people, that means, the gaza strip 1.5, 1.8 million, the west bank of the jordan river 2.5 2.8 million people, so, in general, the palestinians are one of the most divided nations, in addition, it means that they have a very large, it means, historical memory, they remember their nagba, 47-48, when the palestinian state was annulled and 700 thousand palestinians were forced out of their territories, a large number of palestinian settlements, populated areas and so on were destroyed. during this time, new generations were born, who from young nagta, they nurtured the idea of ​​revenge, return to

national territories, creation of a palestinian state. but we already see due to the huge number of palestinians, well, such an option, as was written in the decision, it is impossible, it cannot return to such a territory, the current number of refugees, even if not all 14 million, but at least 7-8 want to return, there is nowhere, there is nowhere to return to, so the situation is very difficult, in addition, the conflict in gaza has caused an even greater deterioration in the disasters, the suffering of the palestinian people, this is by no means will contribute. that means, the increase in the authority of fatah, the peacemaking wing of the palestinian movement, and those forces that are committed to dialogue with israel, on the contrary, there will be a large number of martyrs who will be ready to die, so i view the situation very pessimistically, especially in the long term: israel, with its current actions, is driving the disease deeper, exacerbating

it and making it generally lethal.

i think that the first task is to stop the deaths of the peaceful palestinian population, at least to save those who are still alive, well, what will happen in the future is a matter for the future, but now the main thing is to save as many people as possible, women, children, old people who live in the gaza strip, by any means, at any cost, grateful to the respected guests for our conversation, in conclusion of the program i would like to remind you of the wise words of the english: military intelligence officer thomas edward lawrence, the legendary lawrence of arraway. the whole secret of dealing with arabs is to study them continuously. the same is true for all other peoples of the east. sometimes we approach this extremely unique region with our european standards, as if putting everything on the shelves, in the end we do not understand anything. it is not without reason that the desert is much

more than the sum of its grains of sand. thank you, it was the program saz is authorized to declare, see you next sunday. key players in the middle east are not interested in a big war. secrets, good morning and good mood. on the air of the belarus 1 tv channel from the satellite tv channel belarus 24, the program "good borders belarus". my name is svetlana borovskaya. meeting amazing people our country. and what can you think about here, you look around, beautiful, beautiful, everything goes away, everything seems to be left behind. listen, oh, oh, you have a bite. oh, wait, there 's some horse there. and there's a lot of useful and interesting information, oh, only he's still very much alive, very much alive, yes, we need to wait a little, we need to wait a little, let him

calm down, yes, because newly discovered, yeah, now i'll mix rice with mushrooms, fried onions, we'll stuff me, oh, adopt me, mom, don't be offended, mommy, my darling, it's so good in this family, traveling is not only getting to know history and sights. hello, what a meeting! hello! there we saw a little bee, a window. well , now, please, find where they live here in our room. here are 1 2 3 4 5, and now find the living ones, except for me, traveling is an opportunity to try something new and,

of course, to join the unique folk art, well, children on stage - it's always something about... sincerity, about a smile, about light and purity, it's incredible, i myself i actually remember when i was a child and performed on stage, how stressed i was, snowfall, snowfall, the route was built on the belarus 24 tv channel, in our show , cheat sheets will not help the participants. you can only count on your own strength here. the game will be fire. guys, i know that you can hear me too. light up our intellectual show today. vasya, start the first

round. is it true that the diving beetle is a predator? no, i met a diving beetle, it looks like a small bead in the water. is it true that sometimes cabbage rolls are lazy. my grandmother cooked lazy cabbage rolls. oh, hello grandma, yes, what question does not require an answer, for example, there is no help in this house, yes here, well there should be no answer, an example from life, yes, as i understand it, watch the intellectual and entertainment project, i know, on the belarus 24 tv channel, yae gi history.