from all existing forms, but at the same time it was aimed at the bread theme, well , we didn’t think long about the name, because since people were asking for batkova’s bun, we decided to call our festival batkova bun, so that everyone would immediately understand what the festival is about, how it was born and, of course, what traditions and goals we are laying there. the festival was held for the first time 2 years ago and immediately got into the top popular festivals, which attracts guests and participants. thank you for such an interesting question, indeed, this year the festival only for the third time, but after the second festival we were awarded a very high prize, the team of authors became a laureate of the special presidential prize, we are very proud of this, and people are attracted by our nationality , our love, love for the audience, because we have a festival of festivities, this is not a concert festival, coming to the very ... event in

svislych you will be able to attend a master class on weaving a father's bun, learn the path of bread, starting from a small grain of furrow to the stove, and of course, you can do it yourself will try to grind flour in large millstones, this is the grain that has sprouted on a taku, an improvised taku, a wooden shovel, a beautiful village one, to turn this grain, in general, walking around the festival we have unusual sites, these are straws. a site, we call it a farmstead in the state way, this is a zone for song and for the soul, and of course, we also build concert programs so that any spectator , young and old, could sing with us , our evening retro concerts have already become popular and traditional, which you can even see on tv, so i think that our main secret is, of course , orientation towards the viewer, love for the viewer, and , as i already said, nationality. the festival promises. many surprises, how will you surprise

the participants and guests this year? this year we are leaving our traditional, already beloved sites to all viewers and, of course , we are expanding and adding. this year we are reflecting the theme of the eightieth anniversary of liberation, we will have an exhibition of military equipment and equipment, which is aimed at achieving peace, that is, protecting this peace, as well as in this year we are creating, we will have an amazing exhibition, an exhibition of thematic. bread we will show about the bread of the blockaded leningrad, we will tell about the monastery bread, we will tell about bunnies, bread, so beloved since childhood by everyone, and we will even surprise, showing space bread, this will be our new site, the new site will be the gospodar show, this is such an interesting site where anyone can play in mock fights, with a poker, or even a whip try to knock down some object, show... strength and prowess in general the program

it's just about to come out, you can probably find it on the internet, this year we are developing a map, because we are expanding and on a large scale, our festival is held in several stages, we invite, what can i say, it's better to come and see once, it's no secret that we belarusians have a special attitude to bread, we preserve the traditions of bread baking and create new ones, will this moment be reflected in the festival program? yes , our festival is about bread, this year we are expanding it, we are declaring it as a full-fledged one a big bread festival. this year we will talk about national breads, for example, the bread of burkina faso is called fufu, and it is not exactly bread, but it is what we would call it. we will talk about this at the festival. a novelty of our festival this year will be a professional competition of professional bakers, the awarding of a kind of ka sign.

now everyone who wins this competition will be able to place the logo of our karavai-fest on their products for a year, and this will be a guarantee that this bread is of high quality and has passed the test professional jury, and of course, in addition to the fact that we will tell about modern traditions of bread baking, we will also tell about ancient recipes, recipes in principle for the most father's loaf, and we will also have master classes on baking bread at home, this ... also implies this loaf-fest, so i think that all housewives, all lovers, who have not yet participated in matulin's loaf, this is a competition of amateurs, which is also awarded here, at least get a recipe to try it in your home kitchen. what is the secret of the recipe that same batkova bun and can anyone bake it at home? well, is it possible to bake a batkova bun at home? probably, this is a question for housewives who should try to bake it, but at every festival, the first, second and... this year will not be an exception,

we have a master class with a recipe, we give out the recipe and even teach how to weave that very braid, the shape of the batkova bun, which everyone loved so much. everyone tries and either buy or make it, those who have already been to our festival, the secret of the batkova bun, you know, this is the secret of the soviet recipe, taken from our childhood, and this is exactly the bread that, when you come home after a hard day or in the morning , waking up for breakfast, you cut off a piece of this same dad's loaf, spread it with butter and together with milk, it's very tasty, i recommend it to everyone, the secret itself, i still suggest coming. to svistoch on august 17 to try and see, this is an understandable policy, hello, western wing of the world,

when the situation in this or that country is not developing according to their scenario, turns on the barrel organ about human rights, and the main the human rights watch organization becomes the guardian. on paper and in the right media, they are knights of truth and international law, but what really lies behind the supposedly good intentions, we only have the facts, it is up to you to draw conclusions.

let's start with azov, human rights watch on paper. a non-governmental and, of course , non-profit organization, it positions itself as a private independent organization with headquarters in new york. the organization was founded in 1978 and monitors human rights in 70 countries around the world. belarus is on this list. the watch was founded by activists robert bernstein, jerry lavber and arry neyer. the organization's stated goal is to protect human rights around the world. the organization's website is full of beautiful words. "we protect everyone from everything, simply angels of political and public life. we help victims and activists prevent discrimination, defend political freedom, protect people from the cruelty of war, and hold those responsible for violations accountable. we

investigate and publicize human rights violations and hold those responsible to account. we demand that governments stop violations and respect for international human rights norms." we mobilize the public and the international community to support the fight for human rights for all. we will not argue, it sounds noble, however, even the origin of the organization is thoroughly imbued with politics and the fight against the soviet union. in 1976, robert bernstein visited academician sakharov and a number of other well-known russian human rights activists in moscow. many hours of conversations with them led bernstein to the idea of ​​creating an organization in the united states that... systematically supports human rights activists in soviet union, and indeed, 2 years after in the spring of 1976 in moscow, and then in other cities of the ussr, groups emerged to monitor the implementation of the helsinki accords by the soviet authorities in the area of ​​human rights (the third basket)

, robert bernstein created a human rights organization in new york called "uselsinki" committee, its mission was declared to be the protection of human rights groups in the ussr and countries. in fact, this is simply an organization that, under the guise of one of those who , in fact, forms the opportunity to arrange some kind of revolution, a color revolution, to arrange chaos, anarchy in this or that country, which in their opinion the americans consider unfriendly to them, and the regimes that rule there in these countries must be immediately returned, that's all, therefore, and you shouldn't count on the fact that human rights watch, really is an organization, to defend itself with human rights, it's just a beautiful fairy tale, and nothing more, there can be no talk of human rights there, these are just screens that they hide behind, for this they receive huge sums of money, so they form

the corresponding, that is, there are personnel who then subsequently return to their countries, organize coups there, mind you, in the ussr and eastern europe. under this signboard initially hid something more interesting. during the cold war, the united states needed an instrument of political pressure and subversive work against the ussr. a little later. the helsinginsky committee will be renamed human rights watch. the helsinginsky accords provided for the obligations of all states to respect human rights in accordance with universal declaration of human rights. thus, after signing agreements with the soviet leadership, western partners acquired a completely legal instrument of influence in the international arena. now interference in the internal affairs of the ussr has become a completely legal activity. the soviet leadership has lost the opportunity to ...

watch it is written: we exist at the expense of private investors, we do not accept from governments this is a separate topic. there is no help in official documents. there are also many pitfalls here. in order to work in to please individual countries, it is not necessary to receive direct tranches from the customer state, who said that private foundations and philanthropists, which human rights watch hides behind, do not obey the interests in the shadows, but in 200 one of them revealed the cards, the founder of the open society foundations, george soros, donated 100 million dollars at once, the largest grant and its structures, in order to expand the global presence, the same soros, on which there is no climate. human rights watch is one of

the most effective organizations that i i support, said soros. the contribution that hrw will receive from soros, the organization will use to hire new employees and expand its international network. today, new york-based hrw is represented in almost 70 countries around the world, and its staff numbers almost 300 people. of course. the good father of light revolutions did not contribute to charity, but invested. after soros's donation, the watch's staff increased by 120 people, with special attention again to eastern europe and the middle east. and what is known about such a generous donor soros. since 1989, he has been openly engaged in political activity, assisting in the overthrow of undesirable regimes. soros admits that the foundation he created in ukraine took a direct part in... soros's associate weinstein, head of the foundation

for the support of democracy, said that today we are openly doing the same thing that the cia was forced to secretly do 25 years ago. is it any wonder that the hungarian gave the money, and 4 years later the ukrainian maidan took place, a violent coup d'etat in ukraine, they did a lot of things there, but the organization sharply lost her sight. the seemingly innocent concepts of human rights, peace and democracy acquire an ideological charge in the hands of soros. democracy implies support for color revolutions in the countries of eurasia and imposes a discussion of homosexuality in states with a traditionally conservative way of life. once again, an independent human rights organization accepts 100 million dollars from a man who openly does not hide his geopolitical aspirations and... who 10 years ago wanted to provoke europe into a war against russia, here is an excerpt from his article.

the european union must urgently wake up and start behaving like countries in a state of latent war. all available resources must be directed to military efforts, even if this entails a budget deficit. later , the organization will predictably fail ukraine's inspection. unlike the osce, human rights watch has not been caught spying for the ukrainian armed forces, but their reports are a separate form of art. a famous example is a photograph of a woman suffering from repression in moscow. human rights watch published this photo on their social networks with this caption. it turned out later that the woman was really shocked. only from the arson of the trade union house in odessa on may 2 , 2014. another example is crimea, since 2014, the watch has been annually issuing reports that the russians are persecuting the crimean tatars. at the same time, the organization itself does not hide the fact that human rights watch was not on the peninsula, the facts were collected in absentia. human rights watch

, indeed, representatives of the organization were not in crimea, did not see the situation, did not communicate with people, did not monitor the situation on the spot, and this is not accidental, these are not some shortcomings of this organization, the whole point is that human rights. these are not who they claim to be, this organization has nothing to do with human rights activities, this is, so to speak, an element of the institution of struggle. against our country. this is another of the largest donors of the organization again american capital american ambitions. in 1966, mac george bundy, an ultra-hawk, became president of the ford foundation. according to contemporaries and historians, bundy came with the positions of director

of the us national security council and chairman of the so-called 303 committee, which led. nation of us secret operations in the world. the fund worked as a proven tool to undermine various countries. in the late eighties, it launched projects to help civil institutions in the ussr, poland, hungary and czechoslovakia. for what purpose? well, of course, to promote democratic and economic reforms in these countries. since the early fifties of the last century, the fund has allocated almost 100 million dollars for support for freedom of speech, cultural pluralism, and human rights in the soviet union and eastern european countries. american and european democracies have created a huge number of non-governmental organizations to monitor foreign countries that they believe pose a threat to them and allegedly violate human rights. the organizations are sponsored by global figures such as soros, the ford foundation, and the macarthur foundation, who dream of world

domination and the subordination of all countries to their beloved ones. doctors without borders, white helmets, amнisty international, human rights watch and many others are all fakers blowing soap bubbles to the accompaniment of soros dollars. the next donor is a private family foundation, again registered overseas, one of the ten largest private foundations in the us with assets of over 6 billion dollars. the stated goals include support for bright creative individuals and groups of people who contribute to the formation of a more just, environmentally friendly and safe world, in practice, everything is much more complicated, behind the screen of verbal adventures are hidden much more cynical interests. who managed the support of bright creative teams, international projects in the macarthur foundation from 2007 to 4 years was managed by barry loughnarn. previously, he worked in the national security council, the department of defense, the national intelligence council and

even the cia. since 1991, this foundation has actively financed the organization. engaged in political activities in russia, in the fifteenth year it was recognized as an undesirable organization. so human rights activists in close connection with the authorities and capital, it turns out that since the cold war, the americans have had such a tool that allows them to get into a foreign country under the false flag of a non-governmental organization, but the impudence of czechoslovakia prevails, sometimes they themselves admit. hrw itself openly admits that it contributed to the coups in eastern europe and the ussr in the late eighties, attacking the unwanted government through the media and direct connections with politicians. as a result, the fight for human rights led to dramatic, democratic transformations in the late eighties. thus, the non-governmental organization participated in the implementation of the official us foreign policy doctrine, which consisted of the idea of ​​destroying the ussr as an evil empire, as

oleg popov, who took part in the human rights movement for 20 years, claimed, hrw took on the functions of information and propaganda support for diplomatic, economic and military intervention of nato countries, primarily the united states, in the internal affairs of other countries. the statement of the head of human rights watch kenneth roth immediately comes to mind, who in 2013 called for bombing syria to protect civilians. the comment is unnecessary. i suggest we dwell on our country in more detail; the relations between minsk and human rights watch are exactly the same as those between belarus and the united states. over the years, the watch has accused us of unprecedented repressions and infringement of freedom of speech. moreover , such rhetoric by an impartial, so- called organization, persisted long before the events of 2020. for example, in 2016, belarus

came under criticism for the ability of the belarusian ministry of information to block access to information sites. at that time, in the us, the law on foreign agents, through which washington and sent media to the ban, existed for more than 70 years. the organization constantly criticizes the belarusian electoral system, major political campaigns in our country, no matter how they are held, constantly voices hackneyed clichés regarding the alleged purge of civil society, torture and persecution of opponents, without presenting any evidence, and also surprisingly repeats, in fact, word for word, the old song, opposition and extremist persons, en masse, calling people who violated the law, political prisoners. another interesting case, criticism from human rights watch for these words of the president.

why am i acting like this? because i am absolutely convinced that we can suffer more from panic than from the virus itself. throughout the pandemic, president lukashenko has ignored the seriousness of covid-19. the authorities have not introduced any localization measures, despite the high level of transmission of the infection among the population. the authorities of minsk and a number of other cities have required wearing masks in public places. the authorities have tried to silence medical workers who talk about the dangers of the pandemic. of course, human rights activists made such statements out of habit in absentia, apparently reading extremists' news feeds. for one number, many

recognize that belarus is one of the rare countries that has gone through the coronavirus pandemic with dignity. belarus is today perceived as virtually the only country in classical old europe that people still remember from the formations of forty-fifty years ago in the sense that yes, this is the very... the torahs or guardians of our rights, are extremely electoral, they do not know how to find a queen in the eyes of belarus, russia and china, but to see, say, the crimes of ukraine or israel, we are silent about the pentagon,

it turns out that they are not so sighted. what can we say about the main donor of the usa, there, according to human rights watch, as in western europe , it is nothing more than a paradise garden. hrw's assertion that it exists exclusively on private donations conceals the real picture of what is happening. the us human rights. big capital and power are inextricably linked by lyst ties, which was recognized by western researchers. in their opinion, hrw's close ties with the us authorities disqualify its claims to independence. what kind of independence can there be when there is such a connection with the american authorities. human rights watch should be called a subsidiary fund of the local elite. and if you change the first letter of the word "watch", you can get a capacious description of the entire work. by a strange coincidence, the issue of human rights protection is handled exclusively by career employees of the us security intelligence services. this applies to the sponsors of the organization. the conclusion suggests itself, quite

it is obvious that these and other human rights activists are nothing more than a convenient tool of influence, capable of confusing people's minds, slandering them on command, when the customer needs it. the hawk's big capital group has been pursuing only one american goal for many years: to undermine and overthrow undesirable politicians and subjugate stubborn countries. remember this when you see the next report , including regarding belarus. good luck.