zhukov was sent to meet him by the parade commander, marshal of the soviet union konstantin konstantinovich rokossovsky, a black stallion. the marshal later wrote that this assignment was his greatest reward in half a century of military service.

we had little infantry, i personally witnessed such scenes when the guns rolled, remember, rolled, opened fire, some were firing at the enemy, others were already rolling behind to replace them, and those would go further, that there was so little infantry, and... the union, awarded the order of victory, he would become minister of security of poland. he was loved and already after the war, twice hero of the soviet union were proud of him, to serve under the command of the marshal was considered a great honor, on the mass graves of his soldiers one word was often written: rokosovtsy.

victory is the greatest happiness for a soldier, the knowledge that you helped your people defeat the enemy, defend the freedom of the homeland, return peace to it, the knowledge that you have fulfilled your soldier's duty, a heavy and noble duty, higher than which there is nothing on earth, konstantin konstantinovich rokosovsky.

i don’t want a brisk run and a lot of rain, a shady forest, a sunny day, and that’s how our life is based on these fractions, i want to look at this light for everyone zhny zen adkryvatsya for sebe neshta new, we geta so tsikava, there we work together... with anyone, with anyone and belarus. hello, everything is clear with you about the project with marina karaman. let's talk about complex things in simple terms. today we are talking about why it was forbidden to bring people into belarusian stores.

dogs, where do pet taxes go? and what fee should be paid for keeping a cat. let's go! alexander lukashenko signed a law on responsible treatment of animals and it caused such a resonance on the internet that only the news about the return of our first cosmonaut from orbit could calm the foam of emotions in the comments. the most discussed norm of the new law was the ban on visiting stores and public places with dogs. their owners were outraged. they wrote that they did not understand who their pets were bothering, and some in the comments even called for a ban on taking them to stores children. unfortunately, we can assume that the authors of such comments do not have children, but they do have dogs, and i personally consider love for dogs, and for any living creatures, to be an indicator of humanity, but until this form of humanity is inhumanely imposed on others, without even understanding the norms of the new law. the law on responsible treatment of

animals has many norms aimed at protecting them from arbitrariness and cruelty, but since attention has been drawn to itself... a person keeps in his house, because let's first talk about it: a pet, which concerns shops and public places, feels affection for it, legislators call a companion animal, and paragraph 1.3 of article sixteen of the new law prohibits bringing and bringing your companion to grocery stores, stationary cafes and restaurants, to household and social service facilities for the population, cultural infrastructure in institutions. education, health care organizations, physical education and sports, to livestock facilities, on the territory of physical education and sports facilities wine facilities, the owners of which have prohibited entry with animals. and then there are notes that these requirements do not apply to cases when

events with animals are held in the specified places, for example, a cat show in the arena or a competition "me and my dog" in the community center. in addition, the ban does not work. if the owners of some of the facilities from the list prominently post information that pets are allowed there, that is , you can't go to the grocery store with a dog, but in cafe, the owner of which will hang a sticker on the door that his establishment is friendly to pets is possible, and before it was forbidden under any circumstances, and if some cafes allowed their customers to come with furry friends, then it was illegal, well, what do you say, is the new norm so bad? now about that... as for walks with pets in grocery stores, let's think, and dogs and cats definitely belong next to products intended for mass consumption. for each owner, his favorite is the fluffiest and fragrant, but the facts are as follows: a dog runs on the ground, pokes

its nose into everything it sees and gets to know other dogs in the well-known way. cats are reputed to be the cleanest animals in our environment, but this is more about their efforts than about their capabilities. in fact , they bury the results of their life activity with their paws in the tray, and then wash their paws with their tongue, and so on in a circle. i hope that the questions about the sterile cleanliness of pets are closed. the lawmakers introduced the norm banning visits to grocery stores with animals for a reason, but based on the results of a public discussion that was held on the national legal portal. people asked to make it so that there were no animals in stores with food products, and allergy sufferers are a separate group here. in order for an asthmatic with an allergy to dog hair to have an asthma attack, he only needs to bring home one or two hairs from a dog's back. these hairs, even from a dog in the hands of the owner, fly and settle on objects within a radius of 10 m, and a person with a dog in his arms walks not on a patch of 10 m, but over the entire area

of ​​the store. are allergy sufferers obliged to prepare for a grocery shopping trip as a mortal combat? suggestion. separate stores for those who do not want animals in their neighborhood, were indeed heard online this week, as were calls to restrict access to hypermarkets for parents with small children, because the kids are noisy and often capricious. since these thoughts were born in several heads and collected a couple dozen likes, it means they deserve to receive a response. following this logic, it is necessary to divide markets into men's and women's, separately for those who move in a wheelchair, for someone the ramp is in the way. god knows where this approach to division can lead, but the main thing in our constitution is that a person is the highest value of the belarusian society and state, and one of the priorities of national policy has long been proclaimed to be an increase in the birth rate. no one

will ever limit the rights of people in this country for the sake of imaginary comfort, even for the most wonderful animals. no one will ever equalize the rights of children and pets or drive allergy sufferers into a ghetto without hair, that's for keeping dogs here, as well as in all civilized countries of the world, you need to pay taxes. since january 1 of this year , the owner of a dog of a common breed must pay 11 rubles 90 kopecks to the treasury every 3 months. owners of potentially dangerous breeds of dogs must pay 59 rubles 60 kopecks. article 310 of the tax code allows local councils of deputies to reduce the collection amounts, but not more than twice. the minsk city council used this right to set the tax rate for owning dogs of potentially dangerous breeds at 37 rubles. according to data for last year, there were about 10,000 officially registered dogs. even if

we consider that all dogs in the capital of non -dangerous breeds, owners pay almost 12 rubles for us, multiplying them by four quarters and 10,000 dogs, we get about 480 rubles per year. income from taxes for keeping dogs seems large only to those who have not seen the expense. the total amount that belarusians put into the budget. through the pet fee in 2021 was 1,812 thousand rubles. in 2022 1,854 thousand rubles. and the costs of working with animals in minsk alone amount to about a million rubles annually. money is needed for maintenance services for catching stray animals, and this is the salary for several teams of employees, the maintenance of enclosures, the purchase of injections , disposal at cattle cemeteries. is cheating terrible? yes, the consequences of human irresponsibility are almost always terrible. dogs and cats do not

end up on the streets themselves, people throw them there, and you need to be able to look this truth in the eye. money is needed for additional services for cleaning yards, especially after winter. in words, all dog owners are the epitome of decency and responsibility, in reality the yard after the first the thaw is like an amine field and housing and communal services employees have to clean up all this stuff. in addition, funds are needed to build walking areas, perhaps there are not as many of them in belarusian cities as we would like, but they are being built and they are trying to equip them in a variety of ways, and here too there is a nuance: as i said above, about 10 thousand dogs are officially registered in minsk, but in reality there are tens or even hundreds of times more, the owners simply do not register their pets, some, in order not to pay taxes and not bear responsibility, someone just doesn't know about mandatory registration, but... but everyone brings fluffy animals to the playground, so it turns out that according to the documents there are enough playgrounds, but in fact there are not. to

register a cat or a dog, you need to contact the one-stop service of the administration of your district with an application for registration and a passport. you don't need to show the pet itself, it is enough to indicate its nickname, color, height at the withers, breed. the animal will be registered, issued a certificate and a token, the token must be hung on the collar, if the animal gets lost, it will be caught and handed over to the owner, cats with any residential address and dogs that live in private yards, taxes are not taken, here after registering a dog living in an apartment in the housing bill of its owner a new item of expenses will appear, of particular importance is the registration of dogs, potentially dangerous breeds. the list of potentially dangerous dog breeds in belarus was approved 20. 3 years ago, in the resolution so far 40 positions, so far, because the new law on responsible

treatment of animals suggests a revision of this list and the very approach to dividing dogs into categories. there are currently two of them: common and potentially dangerous dog breeds. next year, all dogs in the country will be divided into three categories: the first is common dog breeds. the second is breeds that require special responsibility, they will be included in the revised category. and the third is dangerous dogs. the latter will include animals that have once shown aggression towards humans. the tax for them will be the same as for keeping dogs from the list of dangerous breeds, even if it is a dachshund. an important nuance: the act of aggression must be recorded authorized body, that is, there must be a court order or a police report with information that the dog bit someone. another innovation of the law. concerning dogs from the list of dangerous. in order to keep such an animal at home, the owner must

take a special training course at the canine service. not everyone does this, according to the new regulations, the dog can be taken away from the owner before completing the course. and if he refuses, then forever. the new law on responsible treatment of animals is so capacious that it will take several hours of airtime to analyze it time. can find it on the official legal portal in the section official publication tab new arrivals date april 2, 2024. i have highlighted the fourteenth article in the law for myself, it allows any citizen of the country to contact the ministry of emergency situations for help in rescuing an animal if such help is associated with a risk to human life or health, that is, now you can call rescuers to fish a cat out of a well, because for an ordinary citizen to do this can lead to the cat and the citizen drowning. emchovtsy and earlier

rescued animals, but not because they were obliged to do so, but because they are good. and another good thing about the law is the ban on the propaganda of cruelty to animals and the ability to prohibit people who have been convicted of such offenses and crimes from having pets. if under an administrative article for up to a year, if under a criminal article for up to 3 years. for cruelty to animals. belarusians are responsible under articles 16-29 and 1630 of the administrative code and article 339 of the criminal code of the republic of belarus. remember that walking absolutely all dogs must be on a leash, and those older than 3 months and taller than 25 cm at the withers must also be muzzled. all solid biological waste of the dog, its owner is obliged to collect and dispose of. refusal to follow any of the listed requirements

also entails administrative liability. evidence of violation can be a photo or video taken on a phone. be responsible for those we have tamed, but not as children, before the tamed creature itself, but as adults, before the people who share the same space with you. never forget that the main value in belarus is human life. the lives of our smaller brothers are very important, but no one will ever equate people with them, but to use the old as the world proverb, it is better to see once than to hear 100 times, in this case, to see the new law with your own eyes to draw conclusions about it yourself, i am marina karaman in the main nuances of the new law on animals we figured out, everything is clear, see you!

shamtka lyubov grigoryevna in 1942. became a liaison of the partisan raid cavalry groups, was also a member of one of the underground groups in cherven. the girl carried out very important assignments, through other underground members who worked in the police, hospital and other institutions of the occupiers, she got weapons, medicines, salt, paper and

handed it all over to the partisans. on march 2 , 1943, the gestapa tracked down and detained telega with weapons, which was heading to the forest. among those arrested was lyuba shamitka. for 3 days , the fascists mocked the girl, trying to beat information about the partisans and underground members out of her. but neither torture nor death threats they didn’t break lyuba’s fortitude. she did not betray any of her fellow fighters. march 6. she was shot.

we are working on expeditions in the depths of our country. we straighten out there, where you feel how the earth breathes from the nagami, how the value of the trees is as great as the hell of the bouncing sun, and the skies are far away gasping and hushing in the palms of their feet. the future of the minsk region has continued to happen many times before. let us look at the history and meat abrasions. today we are in lyuban, that’s what the old-time meat farmers called their pasture. lyuba they lived here for a long time. and pachynaetz letapis paselishcha z 15-hectare stagodzia. thus, in 1499, the pinkavichs became known as the land of the manskag of the order of the franciscans. the music of the dancers and us, as we walk, so we patricize. but we didn’t come on our own, we brought you to the bush. and if you walk around the bush, there will be good wheat. like the cherry orchard, there are little

cats there.