tv Squawk Box CNBC March 15, 2024 6:00am-9:00am EDT
6:00 am
it's friday, march 15th, 2024. "squawk box" begins right now. good morning. welcome to "squawk box" here on cnbc. we are live from the nasdaq market site in times square. i'm becky quick along with joe kernen and andrew ross sorkin. as joe mentioned, we want to look at the u.s. equities at this hour. you are seeing all of them in the green. dow futures up 46. nasdaq up 23. s&p futures up 10. this comes after a down day yesterday for the markets. that hotter than expected ppi number we got at 8:30 show the futures or the stock market which looked at that. the futures traded up on that news. eventually, the market looked at the higher yields and realized you may be seeing a longer time before the fed cuts rates.
6:01 am
the fed futures priced that out to july instead of june. if you look at treasury yields, there was a 10-basis point jump in the ten-year yield. 4.27. the two-year yield at 4.68. looking at the hotterthan expected producer prices for two months whand hotter consumer prices, it makes you won beder t you see with inflation. >> the price of bitcoin as we talked about that before we came on -- it never closes. you never know to base the change. that change doesn't tell you what is happening. here is the range from yesterday. i can look at coinbase where i watch it. the high was $73,418. >> we say that. >> the low was $65,500 i did some math. that's $8,000 on a $73,000
6:02 am
stock. more than 10%. if you decide you want to tread into this, be ready to buy at 73 and wake up the next morning to see it at 65. the weird thing about it, gold and bitcoin is supposed to go up with inflation. when inflation is running, it means the fed will not cut. they will not print. >> liquidity play. >> they will not print and everybody wantsthe pivot and the easing cycle. june? >> fed futures priced out to july yesterday. >> we go back to the animal spirits is the economy -- >> it also ran up. >> it ran up with the supply and demand. that is an idiosyncratic issue. and when people think the economy is great and super excited? >> nothing to do with the economy.
6:03 am
i think it has a lot to do with the biden economy in terms of printing money. i don't think it has anything to do -- >> i disagree. it is utterly connected to the nasdaq and to -- >> a risk on. it goes up when rates come down. rates do not come down if the economy is strong. rates come down if the economy he is weakening or inflation is easing. >> i think copper prices were at an 11-month high. that is an indication of global manufacturing. >> the nasdaq is dying for rates to come down. any risk-on -- >> the nasdaq 100 was down as well and now on track for a second week in a row of losses. that's the first time that's happened since october. >> any risk asset. what is better? a red hot economy where you know rates are going up and they are not going to cut or an economy
6:04 am
where it looks like inflation will moderate and rates will be able to be cut? that iswhat spurs the animal spirit. it's both. it's like everything we talk about. great jobs number. people are employed. >> why the initial knee-jerk reaction may have been why the stocks were up, too. it took until later in the day before it turned around. >> rates back from 4% to 4.30%? i don't think we're cutting in june. jamie dimon. they shouldn't cut because that could cause -- >> can i ask a question? >> yeah. >> the biden administration. back in the trump administration, did you think the economy was terrible because rates were so low? >> it was inflation. that's the age old question. what causes rates? >> i understand that.
6:05 am
i think it is very hard to say that was a great economy because rates were so low. you are saying the reason you have to bring rates low is the economy is terrible. >> the best thing in the world is good growth with no inflation. it is all about inflation. you went to 40-year highs on inflation. >> i know the inflation story. >> 40-year high on inflation is why we went up 500 basis points in rates. you go into a cycle the like that and bitcoin went intfrom 65,000. >> we are trying to get back to normal. all of the numbers we read are skewed. >> real wages are rising. almost 9%. right now, real wages have dropped 6% in the biden economy. it is that simple. no bump from the state of the union. zero. 37%. >> i have seen the polls.
6:06 am
>> when you go to the supermarket, if you ever do, if your guy is out and you finally go to the supermarket, everything is $7. everything. cereal. i got sugar pops. you like those? >> sugar pops? you still buy those? >> i buy honey nut cheerios. >> you believe $7 everything at the supermarket is somehow going to turn into $4 at the supermarket if donald trump is your president? >> we might close the border. we might -- >> there are other issues. >> there are a lot of usuaissue that might get better. >> swing voters are unhappy with trump. the thunews alert from washington. reporting that the u.s. planning to award more than $6 billion to
6:07 am
samsung to help expand the already planned $25 billion project in texas. the sources telling cnbc that the white house planning to extend funds to intel in the form of grants and loans from the chips act. the commerce department declined to comment on the report. joe. shares of adobe are lower. 448 a share beat estimate of 438. revenue was higher. revenue guidance was lower. expressing concern over a.i. competition and the openai video generation model which sparked fears to cut into the adobe video editing business. it will work with openai as it deploys its model. wall street was not thrilled that kevin plank is returning as ceo. evercore downgraded the stock saying plank's return was a
6:08 am
signal that the turn around strategy wasn't working and the key performance caterindicators deteriorating in the current quarter. senators from both sides of the aisle rejects the tiktok divest or ban bill. republican senator ted cruz said he was glad the house acted, but said the bill should be subject to a full amendment process. that process could tie up the bill for months and potentially kill it in an election year when lawmakers are busy campaigning and when they don't want to tick off the 170 million tiktok users here in the united states. in the meantime, the chinese government is signaling it won't allow a forced sale of tiktok. bytedance is interpreting that as the government there prefers
6:09 am
the app be banned in the united states rather than be sold. if they can't have it, no one can. spacex conducted a third test flight of the rocket yesterday which was successful. the rocket flew further than previous tests. it lasted an hour before it broke up above the indian ocean. it did not splash down as intended. spacex and nasa celebrating that flight as successful. lyft and uber will cease operating in minneapolis after the ride hailing services raise wages to $$15.57 an hour. uber and lyft promised to push for statewide legislation to counter that city ordinance. >> wow.
6:10 am
they are saying forget it. we can't make it work gl. >> fast food restaurants close down. same thing. when when come back, nvidia helping the conference next week. we will tell you what is going to happen next. you see the nvidia shares there at $884. later, we will talk to mark deamelio about the potential impact of tiktok on his business. "squawk box" will be right back. >> announcer: this cnbc program is sponsored by baird. visit bairddifference.com. it should be called wiffle tennis. pickle! yeah, aw! whoo! ♪♪ these guys are intense. we got nothing to worry about. with e*trade from morgan stanley, we're ready for whatever gets served up. dude, you gotta work on your trash talk. i'd rather work on saving for retirement. or college, since you like to get schooled.
6:11 am
that's a pretty good burn, right? got him. good game. thanks for coming to our clinic, first one's free. ♪ ♪ thanks for coming to our clinic, next. next. stop. we got it? no. keep going. aga... [ sigh ] next. next. if you don't pick one... oh, you have time. am i keeping you from your job. next. i don't even know where i am anymore. stop. do we finally have it? let's go back to the beginning. are you... your electric future. customized. the fully-electric audi q4 e-tron. ♪ ♪ ♪♪ ♪♪ ♪♪ ♪♪
6:13 am
when i was your age, we never had anything like this. ♪♪ what? wifi? wifi that works all over the house, even the basement. the basement. so i can finally throw that party... and invite shannon barnes. dream do come true. xfinity gives you reliable wifi with wall-to-wall coverage on all your devices, even when everyone is online. maybe we'll even get married one day. i wonder what i will be doing? probably still living here with mom and dad. fast reliable speeds right where you need them. that's wall-to-wall wifi on the xfinity 10g network.
6:14 am
welcome back. nvidia is set to kickoff the a.i. conference on monday. ahead of that, our next guest says she is seeing levels of speculative options trading tied to semiconductor stocks hitting levels never seen before. many are positioning for that momentum to continue. she documents this in the piece "frenzy over a.i. and nvidia turbo charges the options market." g gunjan is the writer. gunjan, this is casino-like activity. what is taking place? >> becky, one trader said this is the biggest casino in the
6:15 am
world right now referring to nvidia options and semiconductor options. over the next few days u , we h the nvidia conference and micron earnings and smci set to join the s&p 500 after the market close today. the conference that nvidia is holding keeps coming up in c conversations with traders more than the interest rate decision. this is the thing that everyone keeps bringing up. i think people are on the edge of their seats to see how much higher can the a.i. trade go? how much room is there to run? >> if you are looking at nvidia shares over the last six months, they doubled, but this week, they are down 7.5%. i think people are starting to if h question if this is a straight trade. >> the path of nvidia has wide
6:16 am
implications. i was looking at data and it moved in tandem 14 of the 19 sessions. what is interesting when you look under the hood, people have been positioning for the stock to keep going higher. what traders are telling me is the prices of trades that profit if nvidia kept soaring. think $1,000 calls in shares which are surpassing the bearish trade that would profit if the stock fell. if you look at the stock, it is not telling the full story. there is more exuberance and activity under the surface. sg >> the fed may not be front and center for the traders, but maybe it should be if you are questioning the rationale or thesis that the fed is cutting rates sooner than later. the hotter than expected inflation numbers have done a number on crypto prices. you can see it playing out in
6:17 am
the tech stocks. >> that is the fascinating disconnect. it feels everyone has moved to the soft landing trade. inflation is going to fall idea and not much can shake that, at least in the stock market so far. a lot of the fear this week has been concentrated on the bond market. a little bit of selloff in treasuries. microsoft hit another high yesterday with the a.i. an annou announcement. right now, that fear about decreased rate cuts is not seeping into the a.i. trade and the s&p 500. >> it is when you see stocks and bonds differentiate, people start to wonder who is right. can that bifurcation continue and conventional wisdom suggests that the treasury market is smarter. >> the bond market is smarter. who is the smart money?
6:18 am
nvidia speculators or the treasury traders? that is the big effortgest ques right now. we have the divergence happen this year. stocks have kept rising. a.i. trade has kept reaching new heights although we see a selloff in the treasury market. next week with the nvidia conference is the the next big test. >> what do traders say they need to hear from nvidia on monday in order to make these trades make sense? >> this has become a story stock. i think a lot of people are watching the speech on monday with the keynote address and what does he say about the products or customer demand? the total addressable market? that is going to be the highlight for a lot of people. they are clinging to his every word. >> we have seen speculative frenzies in the past and everybody is trying to figure out where we are in the cycle because a frenzy doesn't mean it
6:19 am
will be over any time soon. what do traders watch for? >> what i will say is we are seeing levels of speculation in options that we have never seen before. >> what does that mean? >> it tells you people are really, really excited about the a.i. trade in particular. most of it is concentrated in semiconductor stocks. some people are looking to play catch up. maybe they missed out on buying nvidia shares and they are turning to the speculative bets. the risky trades to profit to continue to rise in the stock. options activities is surpassing from 2021. >> a hot trade. you hope you don't get burned by it. >> exactly. >> gunjan, thank you. >> thank you. coming up, the senate committee arguing the pros and cons of the four-day workweek. it's friday.
6:20 am
we will bring you the highlights after the break. i would run on a seven-day workweek. >> don't work for andrew. being a changemaker means embracing uncertainty to deliver p performance. you have to start with curiosity. be curious about the challenges in front of you. you have to have commitment to go the long haul to do that. it requires partnership to come up with creative solutions. lastly, it requires agility to pivot enoueewh y nd.
6:21 am
i am here because they revolutionized immunotherapy. i am here because they saw how cancer adapts to different oxygen levels and starved it. i am here because they switched off egfr gene mutation and stopped the growth of tumor cells. there's a place that's making one advanced cancer discovery after another for 75 years. i am here... i am here.... because of dana-farber. what we do here changes lives everywhere. i am here. they're waiting for you. hey, do you have a second? they're all expecting more. more efficiency. more benefits. more growth. when you realize you can give your people everything, and more. thank you very much. [applause] ask, "now what?" here's what. you go with prudential to protect, empower and grow. with everything you need to deliver, you guessed it... more.
6:22 am
one more thing... who's your rock? learn more at prudential.com the future is not just going to happen. you have to make it. and if you want a successful business, all it takes is an idea, and now becomes the future. a future where you grew a dream into a reality. it's waiting for you. mere minutes away. the future is nothing but power and it's all yours. the all new godaddy airo. get your business online in minutes with the power of ai. what is cirkul? cirkul is the fuel you need to take flight. cirkul is the energy that gets you to the next level. cirkul is what you hope for when life tosses lemons your way. cirkul, available at walmart and drinkcirkul.com.
6:24 am
box." bernie sanders arguing their case to reducing the federal workweek from 40 hours to 32 hours without a reduction in pay. citing a.i. which would allow workers to cut back on hours and spend more time with family and on hobbies. what do you say, folks? >> one of the issues we have to talk about is stress in this country. the fact that so many people are going to work exhausted physi physically and mentally. the fact we have not changed the fair labor standards act. this was 1940 we came up with the 40-hour workweek. who will deny the economy hasn't changed over that period of time? >> uaw president shawn fain
6:25 am
spoke in favor of the bill saying many employees are working for less pay and can't retire until later in life. republican lawmakers expressed opposition to the bill. senator bill cassidy said it would harm small businesses which would lead to layoffs if businesses cannot keep productivity up. >> i would not know where to start on this. i wouldn't want to live in a world without bernie sanders. you know, from the land of ben & jerry's. i love it. it is silly. you love the work. you know -- >> i do like a seven-day working week. >> five days? in this country, we try to have a really -- >> i was going to say -- >> strong economy. >> for a lot of americans -- >> 35 hours. >> for a lot of americans, if we had a 40-hour workweek. >> we are at a 35-hour workweek for decades. they take an hour lunch break.
6:26 am
when i started working, it was a 35-hour workweek. >> it is funny. the idea of the four-day workweek in the white collar land because they are working from home and taking more time. the other truth is, folks working on the u.p.s. truck, those folks are working 12 hours a day. >> i get mail on sundays. u.s. mail. >> i will say there is a separation. this is more of the inequality argument that comes in if you are able to fa nagel a four-day workweek. that is is when minimum wage is coming into play. >> you get the same amount of money, but work 3h2 hours. >> it is true. remarkable productivity and advances. we hope it makes us more productive. >> the advances in a.i. have been seen as shareholder gains.
6:27 am
it will come back. >> we figured out the sewing machine. there have always been great advances. this is transformative. bernie, what i love about bernie, any night of the week, you can see him on the late night shows. never see ted cruz on one of the late night shows. you see bernie. they are all the same. they are all like minded. he is a socialist. he vacationed in moscow on his honeymoon. he's crazy. he's crazy. >> what he is describing is "wall-e." >> i suspect he is turning out to be closer to right than wrong. >> we will know in 30 years. >> he is a little early. i'll give him credit and say he's early. >> i will buy you dinner in 30 years. i know. >> that is the direction of
6:28 am
travel. one of the things he has done over the years, whether you agree or disagree, he does this early anchoring. he puts out these stakes about ideas. ideas you and i think are crazy in the moment -- >> which has come true? >> think of all of the different things we have -- >> what of bernie's anchors has turned out to be right? not one. >> what they do is move the midline. if you are talking about free student tuition or the idea of the wealth tax, all mof those ideas were from bernie sanders. >> think about all of the people who are working at fast food joints around the country getting all sorts of benefits they never got 30 years ago. >> because of bernie? >> he has changed that dialogue.
6:29 am
that's how i argue it. i would say that -- >> child labor laws put in long before he was born. we try to make work better. i won't tie anything to bernie sanders at this point, except, to me, he is funny. i'm glad he is around. >> remember the meme that went around after the inauguration with the mittens? >> the democrats screwed him over with biden. oh, my god. it might be bernie. he can never win. >> bernie sanders as president of the united states? >> he's there stoay ridiculous things? coming up, a read on the economy from david malpas. >> announcer: executive edge is sponsored by at&t business. next level moments need the next level network. let's check . says here it gets plenty of light. and this must be the ocean view? of aruba? huh.
6:30 am
this listing is misleading. well, when at&t says we give businesses get our best deal, on the iphone 15 pro made with titanium. we mean it. amazing. all my agents want it. says here...“inviting pool”. come on over! too inviting. only at&t gives businesses our best deals on any iphone. get iphone 15 pro on us. (♪♪) only at vanguard, you're more than just an investor, get you're an owner. us. our financial planning tools and advice can help you prepare for today's longer retirement. hi mom. that's the value of ownership. you know doug, ever since switching to workday you've been a real rock star. rock star? what do you know about rock stars? billy idol? i mean where's the skin-tight leather?
6:31 am
6:32 am
6:33 am
nasdaq up 42. this is after the down day yesterday. treasury yields have been higher. ten-year yield moved up ten basis appoipoints yesterday. in the meantime, bloomberg is reporting united is looking to replace orders for the boeing 737 max 10 which are five years behind schedule. that report says united is in final negotiations for the planes to be delivered between 2025 and 2027. ceo scott kirby said they were in the market for airbus, but not willing to overpay. that is what scott talked about the last time he was here with the frustration. united is an all boeing fleet. the idea of adding any of the airbus is shocking. it means they will have to change some of the operations and pilots able to fly on other
6:34 am
planes. it is a significant overhaul. i imagine it would not stop with ten planes. >> it is like trying to buy a wendy's single at noon. >> i haven't bought one in forever. oh, surge pricing. >> people need jets. you are not getting any for a while. >> because of the problems with boeing. a duopoly. >> we had scott kirby on. you never want to say it. you could tell just looking at him. with what is happening with boeing, we might go to airbus. >> the problem is they will not be able to expand the schedule the way they planned if they can't get the planes. president biden looks to raise taxes on the rich and our next guest advised multiple presidents on the economy and says there is no size limit on u.s. spending or taxation which
6:35 am
could create a potential train wreck in 2025. joining us now is former bank president david malpass. ever since the budget came out, david, we have been talking about it. you can definitely raise taxes and supposedly cut the deficit by $3 trillion, but almost everyone agrees back with simpson-bolls. there are no spending cuts. we had pandemic spending and we had the same level after the pandemic, which makes no sense. >> that's right. washington is in disarray. you know, i started in the budget process in 1984 with the senate budget committee. it has gotten worse year by year since then. the national debt is exploding. we really need growth now. when you look at the
6:36 am
consequences, what is happening is the government is spending so much money that it hurts production. we're seeing it around the economy. raising taxes, you said that raise $3 trillion, i don't think they would. they always overestimate how much they can do because people respond when the taxes go up which produces less of it. as you look at the number of problems that we're facing, the boeing problem you just led with and the companies going to the european alternative. on semiconductor, look what happened. the dei craze or really focus undercuts the ability for the u.s. to make semiconductors. japan's doing it. china's doing it. taiwan and south korea is doing it, but we can't do it because
6:37 am
of the blockages in the process. now we can't export lng. liquified natural gas because of the ban on that. that's going to drive up energy prices worldwide. i'm really worried about world growth. we keep looking at u.s. growth, which is right, but from the perspective of the world, you have the u.s. government absorbing giant amounts of capital and spending it in ways ineffective. you end up with a mess globally. you see that in all of the fragility and outbreak of wars. there is so much waste going on in the u.s. >> it is the age-old question, central planning versus the private sector. now you can add into the mix mmt. modern monetary theory. because we have the currency which is accepted around the
6:38 am
world and we can always issue debt with the reserve currency of the world, that there is no -- the chickens will never come home to roost. that's what we think right now. combine that with what we hear one side saying about investment. we will invest. if the government knew how to invest more effectively, they can do some things right, but more effectively than the private sector, we would have central planning. the combination of the government that sticks its nose into mmt is why we are where we are right now. we will never get out of it ever. >> that's right. debt is growing now. $34 trillion national debt. it will be $35 trillion by the summer. >> in 100 days. $1 trillion every 100 days.
6:39 am
>> that's right. you see the inflation numbers from yesterday. it's hot inflation. it means things are not affordable for people. houses are not affordable. then they don't make them. you end up with this with the government fuelling consumption. you are not getting the supply on the other side, especially not from american producers on the other side. maybe europeans will be making the airplanes. in china, i'm worried about china as well. we see the end product of their central planning with the economy that is freezing up because of their deflation phase because they overbuilt in certain areas. it is driving down prices. so, you know, the answer, i think is clear. not hmodern monetary theory. people have to speak out on government spending. i was happy to see chairman
6:40 am
powell doing that last fall a little bit. the fed is a really important voice on this. i think we also have to really think about a size limit on the government. there has to be some check and balance that pulls us out of this spiral. >> if it worked, david, if it worked, we would do ten inflation reduction acts every year. ten every year. we would have 30% gdp growth because we have three and we have the fed with the balance sheet of $100 trillion. if it worked, we would do that. we would be in zimbabwe. it would cost $1 trillion to buy a sncnickers. >> they would be out of power. we don't have a grid that is strong enough to support that.
6:41 am
>> right. i wonder if we learn this permanently. we don't. every generation has to learn central planning doesn't work. it gets frustrating. 60% of people in college now are socialists. we can thank our ak democademic that. >> at some moments people write laws where they knew they needed to have checks and balances. i think we need to do that on the fiscal side. we also need to do that on the fed side on the interest rate side. right now, we're in the phase for high for long is somehow going to work. i don't see why or how that will increase production or get us into a better spot as a country. very important is the commander in chief. this is the u.s. which has a system where you need a strong executive because that's where the guidance comes on the war effort and on the afghanistan
6:42 am
pullout and the problems in gaza. i was concerned yesterday by the undercutting of israel and allies by people in washington. how dcan that be? >> putin did not like one of or presidents. now schumer with the same thing. david, we have to run. i hear the music. >> good to see you. when we come back, the s&p retail index is up 14% since the start of the year. we will talk about the take ways from the retail earnings season and what to expect in the current quarter. reminder, you can get the best of "squawk box" in our daily podcast. follow us on your vofarite podcast app and you can listen anytime. we'll be right back.
6:44 am
your shipping manager left to “find themself.” leaving you lost. you need to hire. i need indeed. indeed you do. indeed instant match instantly delivers quality candidates matching your job description. visit indeed.com/hire trading at schwab is now powered by ameritrade, giving traders even more ways to sharpen their skills with tailored education. get an expanding library filled with new online videos, webcasts, articles, courses, and more - all crafted just for traders. and with guided learning paths stacked with content curated to fit your unique goals, you can spend less time searching and more time learning. trade brilliantly with schwab. (grandpa vo) i'm the richest guy in the world. hi baby! (woman 1 vo) i have inherited the best traditions. (woman 2 vo) i have a great boss... it's me. (man 1 vo) i have people, people i can count on.
6:45 am
6:46 am
well, now most retailers have reported full year results and looking forward to 2024, it is probably fair to say it is a mixed shopping bag for the sector. courtney reagan is here with the expectations going forward. >> good morning. good to be here. most retailers have inventory and promotions under control which led to improved margins. forward guidance is wide for many and cautious for most. the u.s. consumer is resilient and quote choiceful. a term used this quarter by several executives to describe discretionary spending patterns. lseg says 40% of retailers mentioned inflation in the
6:47 am
results. 26 were negative announcements and 28 of the 43 gave disappointing q1 guidance. ulta beauty's forecast is below the street for the first time in three years. ulta is and will be a beneficiary, but executives are looking ahead with caution. dick's sporting goods is resonating with shoppers and kohl's active businesses being a weak spot. dollar tree took a hit after it reported and called out weakness in the family dollar business citing a strapped lower-end consumer. many of the stores serve a lower-income shopper. target announced a plan to open 100 is stores, macy's and family dollar plan to close hundreds of loca
6:48 am
locations. xr, it is week to date. williams-sonoma is up in double digits. dollar tree is down. under armour announcing kevin plank is returning as ceo. it was a couple of busy weeks for retail. it all comes down to executing fundamentals. >> i wonder if it is guying on i geog geography. is that a poorly put together combination of the companies or one of them was in a worse location. >> that is a really good point. there are thousands and thousands of dollar stores. so many. probably more dollar stores than any other type of retail location. that probably does account for some of it. family dollar called out a high level of shrink at that
6:49 am
location. again, you know, issues with the consumables. walmart is picking up share. that is interesting. if you remember with the financial crisis, it was the opposite. so many people were going to the dollar stores for the fill-in trips as opposed to walmart for the whole grocery basket. >> courtney, thank you. >> i love high levels of shrink. we sanitize it so much. high levels of shrink. >> i'm saying that because that's the term they used with shrink. we know shrink encompasses all forms of inventory loss. they did not say theft. >> you are using their words. >> except their dumb word choiceful. >> so many. >> why make up a dumb. >> executives being choiceful.
6:50 am
6:51 am
with our laser—measured cargoliners. no drill mud flaps and floorliners. to secure your phone don't forget the cupfone. order yours today at weathertech.com. you never know when it's gonna be a weathertech day. perfect weather today... as an independent financial advisor, my promise to you is simple. as a fiduciary, i promise to put your interests first, always. i promise that our relationship will go well beyond just investment decisions. it's the intersection of your money and your life where we can make the biggest difference. [announcer] charles schwab is proud to support the independent financial advisors who are passionately dedicated to helping people achieve their financial goals. visit findyourindependentadvisor.com
6:52 am
6:53 am
trillion by 2025. joining us right now is crypto.com ceo chris meserlek. good morning to you. let's start here. if $7.5 trillion, what is the current market cap of crypto right now? bitcoin is, what, about 1.5? >> about that, yes. so we are looking at roughly 3x'ing the entire market according to the analysts in about 18 months. >> and we have been talking this morning and really all week, maybe in the last several weeks, obviously bitcoin has been on this remarkable run as has ethereum and so many other currencies we can discuss to be described as currencies or what they should be described as. but when you see this type of move, how much of this is literally just a supply-demand issue that is being created by the halving of bitcoin, but more importantly the etf market and how much of it is something else, meaning it has to do with what you think the fed is going
6:54 am
to do or what the economy is doing or what the nasdaq is doing? >> i think the move is predominantly driven by the inflows from the bitcoin etfs. there is a very successful product and there is a problem of supply side. so, it has to be reflected in the price. >> what do you make of this move down, though, even in the past couple of days? what is that suggestive of? >> i think it is a healthy move, removing some of the leverage that built up in the system. and, you know, what we want to avoid is we want to avoid sudden progressive spikes. we do like to see steady inflows into the industry, into bitcoin, that allows us to have about 12 to 18 months -- >> can you figure out though, chris, what is happening. in the past 24 hours, we have gone from $73,000 to $67,000. was that a function of the
6:55 am
retail market selling actual bitcoins or was that institutions selling etf -- the etf? what do you see, given the flows that you see, actually happening behind the scenes? >> so, we sit on a ton of proprietary data. we can look back at 2021 cycle from retail perspective, and compare it to what is happening now. looking at the data and the intent as a signal from retail side, we're probably in december 2020, january 2021, we are seeing this kind of ma metrics. i think this is driven by what is happening in the options market and the correction. but you have to remember, this volatility actually is pretty low comparing to what we have seen in previous cycles. so -- >> that's what i want to ask you, is that over?
6:56 am
20,000 to 3, 65,000 down to 17, now there is etfs, more mass adoption, more institutional ownership. are those days over? can we still expect 80% high to low moves for bitcoin in the future? >> i think you would see a steady ramp up and that's what we want. and i think it is the size of the market and the increasing liquidity happen, you will see lots of sudden moves. this is -- this is an asset that you want to hold for decades, not for days or weeks. >> kris, it is a longer conversation. i hope we get to continue it with you. we appreciate you joining us this morning. thank you. >> thanks for having me. coming up, we're going to read the charts with katie stockton. i wonder about the resistance on -- resistance and support,
6:57 am
that's what we're talking about, for bitcoin. plus, ticking off tiktok creators. the house passing a bill that could lead to a potential ban of the social media giant. we have reaction from the head of a creator family, the co-founder of d'amelio brands. "squawk bo cinrit ck x"omg ghba. the future is not just going to happen. you have to make it. and if you want a successful business, all it takes is an idea, and now becomes the future.
6:58 am
a future where you grew a dream into a reality. it's waiting for you. mere minutes away. the future is nothing but power and it's all yours. the all new godaddy airo. get your business online in minutes with the power of ai. at pgim, finding opportunity in fixed income today, helps secure tomorrow. our time-tested fixed income suite, backed by over 145 years of risk experience, helps investors meet their goals. pgim investments. shaping tomorrow today.
7:00 am
the dow snapping a three-day winning streak this morning. futures are pointing to a bit of a bounceback. we're going to talk market technicals. plus, hot inflation data and the fed's rate path. we'll hear from a former fed president on when rates may come down. and the impact of a potential ban on tiktok on content creators. the father of two of the most lucrative tiktok stars out there joins us to talk about what the potential is. the second hour of "squawk box" begins right now.
7:01 am
good morning and welcome back to "squawk" here on cnbc. friday morning, we're live at the nasdaq market site in times square. i'm andrew ross sorkin along with becky quick and joe kernen. we got a lot going on in the markets. we're going to show you that. plus a lot going on in crypto land. we're going to look at the charts in a moment with katie stockton who will help us out. the dow looks like it would open up 40 points higher. nasdaq 34 points higher, the s&p 500 up 11.5 points higher. treasuries, ten-year note at 4.281%. the two-year at 4.692%. bitcoin at $67,452. taking a trip up from $73,000 down to $65,000. a lot of volatility in the last couple of hours there. a closer look another that technicals.
7:02 am
katie stockton, cnbc contributor. i want to talk equities, definitely. and the breakdown in some of the magnificent seven. i want to talk bonds. i want to talk gold. but, we have been talking a lot about bitcoin. last time you were on, i think we -- i'm going to exaggerate -- i think we said there was resistance at 30,000. got through that. got through that. you said it could go to 36. this is happening quickly. >> it has. i mean, it is a parabolic -- which honestly this market has a lot of those right now. but for bitcoin, it is pending confirmation of this major breakout, the resistance, the latest resistance, which we consider to be final resistance was just shy of 65,000. i think we may havetalked about that level. above that, there is no other resistance. you get this measured move objective, which assumes the same trend will maintain itself and that gets it to about
7:03 am
80,000, 81,000 over the intermediate term, which, for me, is around 2 to 4 months. near term, however, just as of today, we're seeing it confirmed short-term sell signal. this is based on the indicators. it is the first one in a few weeks. that would call for a couple of weeks of consolidation, within this very steep uptrend. i don't think anybody would be surprised by that. >> i didn't hear any numbers below 60. >> we like to use the 50-day moving averages. >> what is that? >> i don't know. i should have looked this morning. forgive me. >> that would be a surprise for mid-50s. >> if you look at the 50-day moving averages for any of the names that are steep in parabolic up trends, it is really initial support on a chart. it doesn't mean you have to ride to down 20%, but rather have some kind of stop loss discipline. we don't have any major breakdowns in the megacaps.
7:04 am
we have consolidation under way. we have short-term loss of momentum. really nothing concerning. >> nothing with apple or tesla? >> well, okay, apple actually does have the shape of what we would call a long-term double top formation. so if it were to break down decisively below this 170 support level, that would be pretty major for apple on the downside. >> just apple? >> just apple. apple has been the laggard. not the nasdaq, nothing of that shape or form there. tesla is its own beast, and has pretty freshshort-term breakdown. >> you think a lot of the -- we see a broadening. we see a lot of catch-up to the generals in the nasdaq. >> definitively. it has been a concentrated leadership environment of late with the 500 benefitting from nvidia's huge move and yet breadth of participation has been super strong, meaning the
7:05 am
equal weighted benchmarks, midcap benchmarks, those have pretty major breakouts. and it is a global upmove that we have seen. around the world we're seeing big breakouts to even new all time highs for some benchmarks that have lagged the s&p 500 for many, many months and even years. >> what about the volatility? we haven't really seen much on the vix. it does feel like there are more volatile elements out there. >> it's been making higher lows. so it is really quite subtle on the vix. if you look closely on a daily bar chart, you know, the chart would project maybe 18 to 21 as a range for the vix. to elevate it, we have seen much worse from it. but we have been over the past couple of weeks recommending vix products as a hedge, a short-term, topdown partial hedge. we don't want to be fully hedged in exposure because we believe this to be more of a neutral, sort of consolidation within a
7:06 am
very strong uptrend. >> have yields broken out on the ten-year? >> yields have short side momentum. the initial resistance is around 433 to some minor level and above that, it projects about 455. that, to me, is a likely level for it to make a lower high. >> are rate cuts off the table? >> i don't know. >> i need you to know. i need you to tell me. >> i need you all to tell us. inform the viewers. so i do think that 455 is probably likely based on what we're seeing in the indicators. we have an intermediate term momentum gauge that is on the verge of its first crossover, or buy signal in the way for yields for months now. i think it is a move that could sustain itself here maybe a couple of months. >> is there any way you can chart inflation? do you do that? >> you can chart anything that has a number, right? but when you -- >> a downtrend? has it stopped? >> i would say it is more neutral. neutral would be -- it is not as
7:07 am
exciting, but -- >> that's what we really need to know that last mile. and you think -- well, you know, that's a fundamental question. whether the fed moves the goal post. 3% is pretty good. do you think that would ever happen? probably not. >> i don't know. i'm the wrong person to ask. >> okay. >> keep trying. >> i do keep trying. how about leadership and sectors in the s&p? anything look really bad, anything look really good? >> you know, it has been a very offensive market. so -- >> you're offended? >> the defensive sectors have, of course, lagged. if you look at the consumer staples sector versus the s&p 500, same with utilities, very well defined downtrends, reits as well. and, of course, to contrast that, we have technology in a very strong uptrend. >> how about the russell and small caps? >> the russell has assumed better relative strength. it is far from being strong. but we have a russell breakout that to me has very bullish long-term implications. it is almost like i feel like
7:08 am
this year is a year of the long-term turn around. that's where i think there is some excitement because you can find them in financials and healthcare and in value stocks. >> it is funny, you said the final resistance was exceeded by bitcoin. but then you still gave me a number for the next one. >> that's called a measured move. so it is making a 100% projection of the trend essentially. 80,000 -- it seems kind of conservative, doesn't it, but it is all we have. >> some people that come on, they hear numbers like 150,000 and things like that. >> i wouldn't rule anything out. it is not necessarily a stopping point, but a natural -- >> we never talked about gold. gold is the same -- >> it really is. gold, the level we had been watching was final resistance, 2063 per ounce. we have an objective. i think it is close to 2280 or so based en that same analogy.
7:09 am
>> it is only final for a while. then you get -- then resistance comes back. >> right. these are very subjective and also fluid levels. but when you derive these -- >> some are much more final that i worry about. >> the market is dynamic. we have to react to it at times. but at these levels, that's where you expect a corrective phase. >> katie, thanks. >> of course. >> okay. when we come back, united health group outlining a timeline for restoring some services taken offline for more than two weeks after that cyberattack on its change healthcare subsidiary. that impaired payment and data programs. the company's payment platform restored today. we'll have a lot more on the details on that after the break. later, tiktok creators voicing concerns over the possibility of a ban. former treasury secretary steven mnuchin telling us yesterday here on the broadcast he's working on buying or trying to buy the whole company. we'll bring you some reaction to all of that from somebody who made tiktok a family busins. 'lbeig bk.es
7:10 am
7:11 am
7:12 am
wait a minute... are you kidding me? you got to be kidding me. rolling towards the cup, and it's in the hole! what an impossible shot brought to you by comcast business. you can make money the hard way as a bullfighter or a human cannonball... or save money the easy way, with xfinity mobile. existing customers can get a free line of our most popular unlimited plan for a year! not only will you save hundreds but you'll also be joining millions who have connected to america's most reliable 5g network. sure is a lot safer than becoming a stuntman for money. get a free line of unlimited intro for a year when you buy one unlimited line. visit xfinitymobile.com today to learn more.
7:13 am
welcome back, everybody. united health says that it is aiming to bring systems back online by today after a massive healthcare hack described as the most serious on the u.s. healthcare system to date. that disruption is in its fourth week. it brought payments and other systems offline and is estimated to be costing healthcare providers as much as a billion dollars a day. for more on this, we want to bring in former fda commissioner dr. scott gottlieb, a member of imlumina and pfizer and cnbc contributor. dr. gottlieb, i don't know we have done enough to explain this situation and describe to people what is really happening. this is kind of catastrophic.
7:14 am
what happened? >> it is very pervasive across the entire healthcare system. this is one of the largest facilitators of health claims and medical claims in the country. they handle about 15 billion claims a year, totalling around $1.5 trillion. basically a third of the entire healthcare system, we have a $4.5 trillion healthcare system. what this system does is it handles claims not just for united healthcare, but for other insurers as well. doctors will subscribe to this system, contract with it. and it will tell them whether or not patients are eligible to receive a prescription or whether they're eligible against their insurance plan to receive a certain procedure, what the cost will be, what the provider will be paid, what the co-pay to the patient will be. so, a patient comes into a provider right now, goes to a pharmacy, and this system is down, they don't know whether or not their claim is going to get covered, the provider doesn't know whether or not they're going to get paid, the patient doesn't know what the out of pocket costs are going to be. these are being adjudicated by hand in many cases. some insurers stepped in and
7:15 am
said, look, if you milwaake a g faith effort, we'll stop the providers. other insurers haven't. you have the system now in many cases in limbo, some elective procedures are getting pushed off. others just are getting done, but providers don't know when they'll get paid and they're out of pocket for the revenue right now. >> are there surgeries that are life threatening that aren't getting done as a result? are there people going without necessary medications as a result of this? >> yeah. i haven't heard any anecdotes with things that are necessary, aren't getting done. i suspect there are elective things that are getting pushed off. i heard stories where prescriptions are getting filled for two weeks at the a time, so pharmacies aren't filling prescriptions for a month, three months at a time, because they're uncertain whether or not they're going to get reimbursed, whether or not the patient is eligible to receive a medication what the co-pay is going to be. there is definitely some dislocation in the market right now. we're probably going to see that show up to some extent when we
7:16 am
see quarterly earnings from some of the big provider systems. i suspect we're going to see when united reports on april 12th their earnings what the costs to united has been. they have stepped in to back stop a lot of the claims. some of them probably the patients weren't eligible for and united has to eat the costs. they have done quite a bit on the pharmacy side to back stop pharmacies. a lot of pharmacies are mom and pop pharmacies, 20,000 pharmacies in this country, fully a third of all the dispensed medication, upwards maybe over half from mom and pop pharmacies, not the big chains that don't have the ability to bridge themselves in an instance like this. >> we think of this as being such a wide system, healthcare system. the idea that there is a point of redundancy that affects a third of all of that, was this a surprise to you? >> yeah, it was. i think that we need to look outside the industries we tradition a looked at where there is single points of failure. there is other medical
7:17 am
processing companies like wavestar that process a lot of claims. we never thought about these sort of single points of failure, these single nodes, in industries that are perceived as fragmented, so it is hard to take down. you perceive the medical industry as a fragmented industry. what happened here, this is a worm-like virus that has lateral movement within the system. so it didn't just infect this change healthcare system inside united central servers, but it branched out into all the nodes that were connected to that. so literally every health system that is connected to this change healthcare system now needs to be checked to see whether or not this worm-like feature had lateral movement into those systems. that's why it is so hard to get this turned back on, because they need to check every node that is connected into the change healthcare infrastructure if you will. this is the same virus that was -- same group that was believed to be behind the
7:18 am
colonial pipeline ransomware attack in 2021 and the attack against mgm and caesars in 2023. it is a known group, a known feature, if you will, a known attack, just hasn't affected something like this in the healthcare industry before. >> if it is a -- if they're able to identify a weakness in the system that you as the former head of the fda didn't even recognize or see, i mean, that suggests an awful high level of sophistication. is there the idea that this could be potential nation-state, really targeting u.s. in infras infrastructure? >> well, the group that is responsible for this isn't believed to be a national actor. this is a known ransomware gang. i think we need to look -- i think other groups that look for the soft targets inside the u.s. economy need to now look differently, through a different lens, to see whether or not there is other very fragmented industry that you never thought had a single point of failure
7:19 am
that has a soft target like this. cms was slow to recognize this, i believe. they didn't put out their first statement until march 5th. we were alerted on february 28th. attack happened on february 21st. cms, the center for medicare, medicaid services didn't put out a statement until the 25th. the government was slow to act as well. i don't think there was a recognition of how pervasive this would be and what the impact would be across the healthcare landscape. we started to hear -- i started to hear it anecdotally from providers hooked into the system, the impact on their offices and you started to see things appear online from providers complaining about this. but i think there it was slow to recognize or the government was slow to recognize what kind of impact this would have if it was protracted and should have been recognizing this was going to be protracted right from the outset. >> you look at shares of united health and over the last month they have gone from $520 to
7:20 am
$489, a drop of 6%. what you're talking about, the potential implications, sound like they're not even going to be able to really get their arms around the reliabilities at this point. >> i think they're getting their arms around it i talked to people close to this. if this had happened to any other entity, i think this would be game over. the fact that united healthcare owns change healthcare and can bring enormous resources to bear to try to get this system back online is one of the reasons it probably will get back online. if this was still an individual company, stand alone company, remember, united acquired this back in 2022 for $13 billion. this is a stand alone company and didn't have the deep pockets of united behind it. i'm not sure it would be getting back online as hopefully it will. i think on the pharmacy side and the provider side as well to some extent, they're back stopping claims, saying to pharmacies, if you're making a good faith effort to check eligibility, we're going to make sure you get paid. some of those claims patients won't have been eligible for
7:21 am
those products or they'll have had higher co-pays, they won't claw that back or leave the providers on the hook based on what they're telling pharmacies. i suspect there will be a hit to united. i'm not sure they're stepping in the same way, others are connected to the system as well. this is united's problem, they're being moreaggressive in trying to back stop some providers right now to make sure they're going to get paid so they can continue services, even where patients based on their insurance plans won't be eligible to receive the service or receive the prescription product. >> scott, thank you for explaining it to us. >> thanks a lot. coming up, a look at some of the movers, premarket movers with the futures as you can see all in the green. all three indices. we're coming right back. >> announcer: time now for today's aflac trivia question. where is the tallest waterfall in the continental united
7:22 am
states? the answer when "squawk box" rern tus. see that? that's like the gap in my health insurance. gap in your health insurance? yeah, it didn't cover everything when i got hurt. good thing i had aflac. hmmm the cash i got from aflac helped pay for medical expenses, groceries, rent. it really helped close that gap. go, go, go! yay! go aflac! go duck! get help with expenses health insurance doesn't cover at aflac.com wish we had aflac on our team. you can! ( ♪♪ )
7:24 am
you know doug, ever since switching to workday you've been a real rock star. rock star? what do you know about rock stars? billy idol? i mean where's the skin-tight leather? my shoes are leather. where's the unnecessary zippers? that thing! billy, rock star is just how doug feels when he uses workday. thanks, rory. i'll show you rock star! be a finance and hr rock star. workday. for a changing world. billy idol just stole your golf cart! >> announcer: and now the answer to today's aflac trivia question. where is the tallest waterfall in the continental united
7:25 am
states? the answer, washington. colonial creek falls in north cascade national park falls 2,568 feet. let's get over to dom chu with a look at this morning's premarket movers. good morning, dom. >> let's kick off our friday edition of morning movers with nvidia. the biggest computer chip company in the world is up fractionally right now around 400,000 shares of premarket trading volume, looking to try to snap a two-day losing streak. the stock entered corrections or 10% plus drop from their recent highs. you remember hit a record level a week ago today. a drop of that magnitude is sometimes something traders pay attention to for momentum. though if we put it in context, remember, that 10% drop is very tiny compared to that 265% move that shares have seen rally over the course of this year and the last 12 months. so, it is a small blip, but it is a big options day and highly
7:26 am
traded stock so keep an eye on any kind of volatility nvidia today. sticking with megacap technology, apple shares up fractionally this morning on just about 100,000 shares of volume. the iphonemaker and app services giant has been an underperform over the medium term. but apple now has purchased a canadian-based artificial intelligence startup. darwin a.i. specializes in technology around inspections during manufacturing processes. that acquisition comes as apple looks to deploy more resources to bring a.i. products to market. apple shares up one-third of 1%. we'll end with a surge in shares of magical pharmaceuticals, up over 25% at this point right now. just around 35,000 shares of volume. the u.s. food and drug administration approved the company's first ever treatment for a potentially deadly liver disease known as nash or nonalcoholic stapido hepatitis.
7:27 am
andrew, madrigal pharmaceuticals up. back over to you. >> dom, thank you for that. have a great weekend. coming up whether we return, the latest inflation data changing the fed's outlook on rates. that's the question. we'll have that story and we're going to hear from former kansas city fed president thomas hoenig. and then later, for the d'amelios, tiktok is, yes, a family business. we're going to speak to the person behind some of the biggest content creators on that platform. we'll get reaction about a posslean fib brom congress. you do not want to miss it. "squawk box" coming right back. they're all expecting more. more efficiency. more benefits. more growth. when you realize you can give your people everything, and more. thank you very much. [applause] ask, "now what?" here's what. you go with prudential to protect, empower and grow.
7:28 am
with everything you need to deliver, you guessed it... more. one more thing... who's your rock? learn more at prudential.com the all new godaddy airo helps you get your business online in minutes with the power of ai... ...with a perfect name, a great logo, and a beautiful website. just start with a domain, a few clicks, and you're in business. make now the future at godaddy.com/airo
7:30 am
one of the big questions for the fed next week, whether the last two months of inflation data changes the fed's outlook and the prospects for rates coming down. steve liesman is connecting the dots for us right now and joins us with more. and, steve, we keep saying these are one-off numbers, but when you start to have number after number rack up, makes us want to take a closer look at all of it. >> it is two in a row, becky. there is risk next week in those fed protections for the economic and rate outlooks. the so-called dot plot after two
7:31 am
months of bad inflation reports making little progress toward the fed's goal of 2% inflation. the median official in december forecast 1.4% for gdp. we are running above it, at least so far in the first quarter. core pce at 2.4%. wall street thinks that we're going to come in at just 2.8, down a tenth for the february pce. and the fed funds rate at 4.6%. the median, 2024 projection in the middle is 4.6% or three cuts. if just two of the 19 officials decide, hey, we should cut only twice, then the median moves to two cuts. it takes two to tango on this one. for the fed, it comes down to a question of how do you think about the past two months of inflation. are they signs of a stall if they have to worry about in their progress or are they just -- some officials said they're just noise, bruce willis said there are risks to the outlook with -- joe wallace, with the economy, continuing to outperform and consumers still
7:32 am
resilient. the fed may be far more patient on rate cuts than its forecast implies or the market has priced in. he doesn't think there is a change, but as he points out, there is the risk. futures market ganz s began the looking to end the year at 3.8. that's long gone. it is now building at -- it was then building at 160 basis points of cuts. now the contract trends at 456 with just 80 basis points of rate cuts built in for this year or right about where the fed is at 3 25 basis point cuts. the question is whether the fed moves the forecast again and markets have to price in the risk about both when the fed cuts, we have been talking about that, but also now in play is by how much. >> i think that 80 is going the way of 150, possibly. but i change constantly. but who -- why in god's name would we ever have just given back all this hard-won
7:33 am
normalization, just for no reason? why? why? why would we have done that? five is not crazy. five is historically where things are. >> it is interesting, joe. it gets down to that debate, maybe you'll have it with mr. hoenig, about where the neutral rate is. right now according to the fed's own look at the world, they're really tight. they're putting a lot of restraint on the economy. why do you need that restraint if you are going to be at or getting towards your inflation target? the fed said -- >> let it ride. >> the fed said they didn't need to cut. you are right, joe. there is a discussion going on about whether or not that neutral rate is higher. whether the fed is imparting less restraint on the economy than it believes. >> well, if 70 basis points can just disappear into thin air, 80 can disappear, same way, steve. but let's -- and i was going to
7:34 am
say, thank you for -- i think i called mr. hoenig hoenig a few times, but -- >> i could be wrong. i could be wrong. >> i call him hoenig. he's here. thanks, steve. and maybe -- >> let's ask him. >> for more on the fed rate, thomas hoenig. which do you prefer, sir? >> hoenig is more -- >> that's nice to know. you never said anything. you're nice. former kansas city fed president and mercadas center, probably said that wrong, distinguished senior fellow -- good to have you on either way. i think i can pronounce tom. it isn't tom, is it? >> it is tom. >> good to see you, tom. what about that discussion we're having, are we restrictive right now? >> i don't think so. i agree i think that so-called
7:35 am
neutral rate that the fed talks about is higher than what the fed has been talking about. i think a real rate is probably closer to 2 given the amount of debt, given the strength in the economy. and if you had 2% inflation target, 4% is a number, rates now are 5.5. that's modestly restrictive. given the fact that the economy in 2023 was stronger than expected and we're starting off pretty well this year, i would say that the neutral rate is higher as some people are arguing right now, higher than the fed's recent forecast. >> well, we're slowly finding religion, i think, from 150 basis points and now we're 80. will there be cuts in july, do you think, now? >> i think the fed -- given the recent testimony of the chairman, i don't think the fed will flip too quickly and too much, but i would say that three
7:36 am
cuts would be a surprise to me given the strength, unless something is happening in the next two months to change things or change perspective on people. i would say two cuts at most and if the economy stays as strong as it has been, and i wouldn't be surprised by that, since it is an election year and there will be no tax increases and no spending cuts in the amount of spending going on is pretty strong, i would say we're going to have a relatively strong 2024 and then 2025 will be, if there is an adjustment year, will be in 2025, it would be my suggestion. and that environment, i don't think i would be in a hurry to cut rates either. but i don't think they're going to change their dot plots that much because they don't want to shake the market up. but in their minds, they know that they have a chance of losing their inflation gains if they cut too soon. so, they got a lot on their plate here this week and for the next two or three months.
7:37 am
>> and i wish -- sometimes i wish we could talk to god, i do. i would ask questions and i want definitive answers. you're as close as we have today. so, was the -- there is two scenarios, the inflation really was transitory and caused by the pandemic, and supply chain issues. and it is just now coming back down. or, we spent too much money for the last eight years, the fed's balance sheet is too big and there is some permanent inflation embedded in the system that is going to make it tough to go back to 2 from 3. which is true? is it really going to be hard or is there too much money sloshing around? >> i think there is a lot of money sloshing around, for sure. i think it is going to be difficult to get to 2% because this is, you know, it was a supply and demand factor, but the supply has been pretty much addressed. and now we have a hangover of
7:38 am
this $6 trillion spending, and that we have to deal with. i think that's part of -- i will say to you, i think there are three reasons the fed would advance their cuts. one is that they actually get much closer to 2% of the next two or three months than i think they will. second, the economy has a surprise slowdown. and, third, if the banking industry shows effects of its wounds, the higher rates, and their asset quality begins to show deterioration, that might accelerate the cut as well. so those are the kinds of conditions i think happen before the fed actually would want to cut rates very much very soon. >> when you look at what scares people, like, inflation in south america in the past, can't 3% -- i mean, i can live with 3%, can we move the goal post, make it a lot easier? >> i think moving the goal post would not make it easier. we have 3% inflection and then
7:39 am
4% inflation and then on and on from there. once you move those goal posts, your credibility goes own. and i think driving to 2% would give us in the long run a more stable economy, people would have more confidence in the fed's ability to maintain 2% going forward. but if they give that up, as they did in the 70s and little by little then they pay the price for it later on and that's been the history, i think. >> you saw the budget proposed. you know that neither candidate is going to do anything with entitlements that we have. so, what type of long term gdp growth are we going to be able to have and do you think that the debt to gdp stays over 100 permanently and what does that mean for gdp growth? how do we -- how do we deal with that? do we ever? >> i think given the current congress and administration we have, i think, yes, i think
7:40 am
government spending will be hard to bring down. government taxes will be hard to increase, so i think we have a permanent deficit and the implication for that as pointed out by the ceo of the congressional budget office means that your productivity does suffer in time. and your real growth rate falls from 2.2 or 2.3% down to 1.8%. i don't think that's unreasonable at all. so i think we do have some real issues that this country has to face and i think the interest on the debt loan will push that debt up unless we get things back under control, which we are showing no tendency to do now in this country by either the congress or i think either administration that might come in in the future. i think we have huge challenges. only when it does start to really push through with higher inflation on a continuous basis will the american people become very impatient and begin to require some of that be
7:41 am
addressed. but not anytime soon. >> okay. mr. hoenig, thank you. kansas city -- former kansas city fed president there. we got it right. i'm not going to forget either. and bartels, marian bartels. >> coming up, much more on today's market movers and what you should be watching ahead of the opening bell on wall street. look at the futures now, 66 points higher if we opened up on the dow. s&p 500 would open about 14 points higher. nasdaq looking to open about 39 points higher. we are coming right back and we will be talking tiktok after this.
7:42 am
why choose a sleep number smart bed? can it keep me warm when i'm cold? wait. no i'm always hot. sleep number does that. now, save up to $1,000 on select sleep number smart beds. plus, special financing. shop now at sleepnumber.com something amazing is happening here. climate researchers are weathering a data storm. that's because cdw transformed their devices and infrastructure with lenovo thinkpads and powerful edge to cloud solutions, delivering faster insights and increased performance,
7:43 am
7:44 am
7:45 am
care products and that stock now down by about 6.5%. pager duty is tumbling today. the fourth quarter results just edging past forecasts, but sales expected to come in below estimates. management saying it sees strong momentum from midmarket and enterprise customers, but still see headwinds from small business. looking at the stock off now this morning a little over 18.5%. we're watching the shares of chinese ev maker neo. the company said it plans to review its mass market brand in may. the new brand will be named ledow, in chinese, which is -- it says it is meant to reflect families having a happy time together. must be a minivan. they have focused on the higher end of the market with suvs and sai sedans priced higher than tesla's models. it has a large scale delivery by
7:46 am
the fourth quarter. it will be good if they can get keanu reeves as a spokesperson. >> i was just looking at a clip from nio, from the matrix. different. >> like ben cerra for cerave. >> leslie picker joins us right now with breaking news. hi, leslie. >> we obtained a letter, david solomon plans to send shareholders today where he talks about the firm's strategy, his views on the macro environment, and a.i. and china. solomon calls 2023 a, quote, year of execution for goldman sachs, while saying he's optimistic about 2024. solomon says the firm stands to benefit as capital markets rebound. this may be a little more
7:47 am
constructive where activity is improving but it is a ways off. as for the broader economy, while solomon says it is proven more resilient than expected and markets are predicting rate cuts, though i think inflation may prove stickier than many anticipate. he said ceos, quote, tell him that economic conditions for the consumer particularly at the lower end of the income strata have gotten tougher and seeing behavioral changes. but the fed now has room to ease if economic conditions start to decline. on a.i., solomon says that it is, quote, important to keep perspective, that, quote, adoption rates will lag, the most fascinating use cases are in their early stages and a lot of work still needs to be done in data security, regulatory frameworks and ethical considerations for the technology to reach its full potential. he does believe that there is, quote, no question that generative a.i. is going to
7:48 am
disrupt a wide range of industries. >> wow. a.i. is on everybody's minds. what can be done? >> yeah, and it is interesting, because we're seeing, you know, it was two weeks ago that jamie dimon said a.i. is not just hype. there are real use cases here. so you got the banks really investing money in here into a.i. for things like operations, for the way that they're communicating with customers, for the way that they're gathering research, so it is already being done in real time. and then, of course, they have a ton of customers and clients who are a.i. companies themselves. so they're really on the forefront of what this technology is. i thought it was really telling that solomon said, you know, this is an amazing technology, but there are some things that we need to work through before it becomes essentially ubiq ubiquitous. >> leslie, thank you. good to see you. coming up next, tiktok
7:49 am
creators voicing a lot of concern over the possibility of a ban of that social media app. the father of two of the most lucrative tiktok stars out there, marc d'amelio, joins us next to talk all about it. then later, former pro tennis player and now coach brad gilbert will join us to talk about the move by the saudis to invest in tennis. he'll join us from indian wells, california, where he's coaching coco. we'll talk to him all ouabt that as well. "squawk box" coming right back. k meets bold new thinking. to help you see untapped possibilities and relentlessly work with you to make them real.
7:50 am
7:51 am
my name is oluseyi and some of my su favorite momentsy. throughout my life are watching sports with my dad. now, i work at comcast as part of the team that created our ai highlights technology, which uses ai to detect the major plays in a sports game. giving millions of fans, like my dad and me, new ways of catching up on their favorite sport.
7:52 am
welcome back to "squawk box." the house paging a bill that could lead to a potential tiktok ban or potentially a sale. we'll see. former treasury sent steven mnuchin sitting at this table breaking news right here working to get a group of investors together to buy the group. take a look. >> i think the legislation should pass, and i think it should be solved. i understand the technology.
7:53 am
it's a great business and i'm going to put together a group to buy tiktok. >> you're trying to buy tiktok? >> i am. sh it should be owned by a u.s. business. no way theywould ever let something like this in china. >> joining us two of the most lucrative tiktok stars out there. you've made much of your empire on the platform that is tiktok. what's going on the dimelio family watching this play out? >> it's interesting. charlie texted me the other day. is tiktok getting banned? we went through this over a year ago where we knew early on that with what happened with vine we would, because we're in social media, diversify, which we've done. we're, although tiktok is probably biggest platform for us we are on all the other platforms, too. >> just as -- looking at how this plays out, how important is it for you and are you having to
7:54 am
do -- thinking, okay. i got to transition more to these other platforms? do you say, i got to call steven mnuchin try to get in on buying tiktok? part of that group? >> i've open if steven mnuchin wants to call me. i'd love to talk with him about it. look, we're in a very fortunate position our run with tiktok has been great. i don't want it banned but it could happen and if it does we're already planning accordingly. >> do you think it's a national security threat? probably thought about this maybe more than most americans? >> it starts to get outside the realm of what i do every day. i haven't seen evidence. not that i would, but i haven't seen testified is a national security threat. i think it is probably one of the biggest platforms for free speech i've ever seen happen. to me that is very important. probably -- the neem have been able to build careers and get their message out, i can hold up a phone right now and i have 10
7:55 am
million people that potentially could see what i have to say and it could -- so that is really important. >> what's the difference in your mind, between tiktok at platform versus instagram as platform, versus youtube shorts as a platform? how do you think about it? you said yourself, okay. i'm going diversify. what do each of the platforms bring you that is potentially different, or do they all feel similar to you? >> tiktok, both instagram and youtube have tried to mimic tiktok. >> right. >> tiktok like in a bottle. it still speaks to me. whatever my interests are comes before my page. >> you think that algorithm is better for example than you get on other platforms? >> it has been. seems to know you. i think that's why everyone loves to scroll on it. >> you created a number of businesses and brands and whole saling as well. in terms of marketing. in terms of the platform selling product for you, is there one,
7:56 am
is tiktok the one that -- maybe because numbers are so big, but from just an effectiveness perspective you say, okay, one does better than the other? >> i think instagram shopping, tiktok was fairly new on the shopping side. instagram's been great. a one click. my daughter dixie buys everything -- just one click shopping. >> sail. i buy a ton of stuff on instagram. >> awesome. they're both good. >> in terms port over users, able to promote sort of the brand and the empire, if you're on tiktok now, saying to yourself, okay. i got six months from now, may not be here anymore. what do you need to do? are they the -- i mean, how easy is it to say, hey, guys. meet me over at instagram, or is it a totally different situation and how do you do it? >> i don't think it's totally different but i find myself on x more than other platforms. >> x you think is working? >> for me personally. for my news, my interests.
7:57 am
>> do your daughters use x, too? >> not as much. probably more on tiktok and instagram. >> the whole family over it, can you do it? do you think you can ever get the same kind of -- because you were sort of early in tiktok, sort of, that -- lightning in a bottle moment, can you get the same kitnd of volume of folks following you on the other platforms now than before? i think a lot of people who live on tiktok today are thinking am i late to the game? i haven't really joined other things and spent enough energy on it. >> difficult. our numbersen 0 the other platforms, but other creators like mr. beast is way bigger, although probably top ten on, top five on tiktok. he's huge on youtube. we have to diversify. we have been and always other apps that come out after this. >> top product selling right now? >> two products. one is d'amelio footwear a
7:58 am
women's brand and be happy snacks. >> gloen blown up in a big way. >> walmart opened up. albertson's in map opening up. in a big way. >> nice to see you. the tech rally bloomed ay cording to some and news of an up to $2 billion investment in tennis by the saudis causing a huge stir in the tennis world. speaking to a tennis coach and former tniens pro brad gilbert. we'll be right back. investment opportunities are everywhere you turn. do you charge forward? freeze in your tracks? or, let curiosity light the way. at t. rowe price, we ask smart questions about opportunities like advances in healthcare and how these innovations will create a healthier world tomorrow. better questions. better outcomes.
7:59 am
new projects means new project managers. you need to hire. i need indeed. indeed you do. when you sponsor a job, you immediately get your shortlist of quality candidates, whose resumes on indeed match your job criteria. visit indeed.com/hire and get started today. every day, more dog people, and more vets are deciding it's time for a fresh approach to pet food. they're quitting the kibble. and kicking the cans. and feeding their dogs dog food that's actually well, food. developed with vets. made from real meat and veggies. portioned for your dog. and delivered right to your door. it's smarter, healthier pet food. get 50% off your first box at thefarmersdog.com/realfood dad, don't forget about my new cleats. sweetie, i can't make it
8:00 am
8:01 am
good morning. stock futures point to a positive open on this final trading day of the week. the dow trying its sports-first positive week in three. meantime, adobe, software giant falling hard on soft fourth quarter guidance, and is saudi arabia forcing professional tennis to take a hard look at its future, just like the country's recently done with golf. that story and so much more on this friday morning as the final hour of "squawk box" begins right now.
8:02 am
good morning and welcome back to "squawk box" here on cnbc live from the nasdaq market site in times square. it's like 60 degrees out there. nice day yesterday. i'm joe kernen. it's a friday. >> did not bring a coat today. >> i didn't either. i'm like jfk. along with becky quick, andrew ross sorkin, u.s. equity futures this hour indicated, that's also, that going for us, which is nice. all green across the board. treasury yield this morning. 430 or so. 427. talking about that and what it means for whether we get rate cuts or not. i don't know. >> let's get down to the new york stock exchange. our good friend and senior markets commentator mike santoli is standing by looking at the markets. what has, have, highlighting on your mind right now? >> well, andrew, that yield move that got the ten year up to
8:03 am
around 430 yesterday definitely got the market's attention. one of the themes running through. figuring out if we have to rethink the rate path, inflation path. nothing to decisive yet. you see here s&p 500 over the last six months along with equal-weighted version of it. equal weight in orange outperformed off the october low then slowed down a little. we know about mega cap dominance, nvidia's outsized role. we saw yesterday equal weight, broader, you know, kind of population of stocks suffered more as did small caps with that yield move higher. that's the pattern. market's able to broaden when yields are tame and lower. had a harder time doing that when yields have been going up. here is a one-year look at the ten year yield. essentially challenging just the upper end of this range we've been in since this, start of december. really since the december fed meeting went essentially rate cuts were put on the table by powell. that was the pivot. people are saying 440.
8:04 am
where we were around thanksgiving of last year. would mean maybe threatening to get out of this range. absolute levels are not particularly scary here. much more whether the trend is going higher. we have handled some treasury options this week relatively easily. look at the goldman sachs commodities index. another quiet sub emerging as well. uptrend here. a commodity index that's actually very energy heavy, consumption based. whatever we consume most of, biggest in this index pup see that's obviously been a noticeable move. again, absolute levels are not particularly concerning. much more about whether it's a trend. seems like a little better growth and a little higher than expected inflation. so higher metabolism economy with higher nominal gdp. see how the markets handle that, andy. >> thank you. all trying to make sense of what's going to happen. the week's almost over. >> almost. getting there. for more on the markets bring in todd kennedy, chief invest
8:05 am
strategist at jpmorgan private bank. tom, the hot ppi and cpi numbers we got for this most recent month have a lot of people questioning whether we really are going to see a soft landing, whether the fed's going to be able to cut rates. you're still a true believer? >> yeah. certainly are. it challenges a soft landing without a doubt, but when you look at underneath the surface of the inflation data, what you see goods-based inflation, deflationary a period of time bottoming out. we're through that phase. the covid-induced inflation rebound, if you will. hard to say that with inflation coming down. seems to be behind us. looking forward all about the labor market. inside the labor market we've just gone through a generational surge in labor supply, and that's from a domestic sense and from an international sense. domestically work-from-home behavior seems to be here to stay. the linked in survey wasn't
8:06 am
wearing a mask going out everything fine. 50% all jobs filled on linkedin hybrid. here to stay and draws people back into the labor force. >> when you look at what happens next with the markets. >> yep. >> you're looking for a change in leadership. you do think the midcaps are going to step up, and take over the reins? >> i think there's a really big opportunity to see is becoming in this rally. concentration of performance in u.s.thetic been stark. we all talk about it. really since october when that fed pivot came into fruition, s&p tech sector has led and at the same time russell 2000 and midcaps outperformed. quite odd. given that the tech concentration is so low. i think it were broaden out for a few reasons. earnings should move from midcaps from negative last year to plus ten this year. valuations are relatively cheap.
8:07 am
a heavy concentration in industrials when the u.s. government is spending. even if we get a change in leadership apartment the president level looks should be durable. >> what if the inflation picture doesn't tame down anymore? i realize only two months, cpi and ppi higher, but if not getting back to 2% that means the fed won't be able to cut rates. seems a lot of what we've seen frenzy in the market has that as a predication? >> yeah. i agree with your point. one of the biggest risks in the market why we spend so much time talking about it. path to disinflation that labor surge. the fed doesn't need to wait for 2%. confidence they can get there. >> confidence it won't go above 3%. jpmorgan jamie dimon said there's more pe terrible things coming. don't cut yet. >> always worried was the risks are we're in the room trying to figure that out.
8:08 am
my job clients and navigating. immigration surge we haven't talked about. generational shift as well. 1% of the u.s. population last year from immigration. we haven't seen population growth like that since 1910. bring in election year. stalled because a literacy test slowed immigration. risk here, too. >> slowing immigration is a risk. >> yeah. inside the election. one thing that separates president trump from president biden. the way they've handled immigration. >> you're saying that open border are a good thing? or -- >> for the u.s. economy fantastic. sorry. from the fed's perspective to tame inflation, immigration is a fantastic thing for them. you're getting the calming in the laker market just from supply side rather than having to lay folks off. a fantastic opportunity for them. >> wouldn't you like to see legal immigration? instead? >> most of the immigration has been legal. i mean, you're -- this is always
8:09 am
hard to see in the data exactly, but the biden administration has ramped up visa and immigration from a legal sense and, of course, there's been illegal immigration as well, but this is one of those places as we look to the year ahead where economics and politics really intersect. and for investors i think we generally look around at history say, elections don't matter. this is one instance it does matter, because we've been very luck toy have immigration that cooled this labor market the tway has. >> that's misunderstood by the american public? >> no. i just think it has political factions to it that are beyond pure economics. in any gallup poll we look at biggest issue for americans is immigration. so it's polarizing. just look at a simple economy, if you see strong demand for jobs, you can cool that in two ways. bring more people to the workforce or you have to -- >> secondary, secondary effect what becky is referring to. illegal immigration, legal
8:10 am
immigration ramped up. also argue that's also good for the fed. >> perverse, agree wholeheartedly. you need a balanced labor market to be confident that inflation won't surge back to 3%. the labor supply helped quite a bit. >> let's pivot quickly just to talk about the lending situation right now. you were making the point private lending is, has been pretty good. if yields continue to climb what will that mean? >> you're starting to see reopening in financial markets. from the fed when they meet next week the realist there, person saying i'm not so sure inflation will go back to 2% they'll look at ipo market ramping up. opening again. lending practices go up. yeah. if rates stay higher longer, should continue to the see lending activity be subdued and not ramp higher, but i think the market is giving private credit the private direct lending the market that's-worried about
8:11 am
that. a bubble. when i look at what bubble is, becky, debt growing in excess of profits. right? simple definition. in the aggregate finance market you're seeing profits up. lending activity tracking as well. private credit taking market share from high yield and loan so far. >> tom, thanks for coming in today. >> thank you. coming up, we're going to wrap up a big week of headlines for disney. next, saudi arabia reportedly seeking a break in the world of tennis. speaking with a former pro and current coach brad gilbert. stay tuned. you're watching "squawk box" on cnbc. you want a successful business, all it takes is an idea, and now becomes the future where you grew a dream into a reality. the all new godaddy airo. put your business online in minutes with the power of ai.
8:14 am
welcome back to "squawk box," everybody. futures thismorning a little bit of a mixed picture at this point. dow futures up by about 44 points. s&p up by 5. nasdaq a little weaker down right now by about 12 points. joe? >> reports that saudi arabia may invest $1 billion or more in professional tennis raising the question about the future of the
8:15 am
sport echoin ing how profession golf has been dealing with saudi and money. joining us now current coach brad gilbert joins us from indian wells, california, where it's all happening this week. coaching the number three player in the world coco gauff. used to win ugly. got a book called that. don't you, brad? >> i do, joe. good morning. >> and he's -- we're going to try really hard to pull some opinions out of him, because he usually, very difficult toget you to ever weigh in on anything. >> go ahead. >> good morning, yeah. obviously this week a couple days ago the big kind of surprise announcement that au aundre gazenzi reached agreement with saudi backing for a new "potential" tour for '26.
8:16 am
also the grand slams, the four big tournaments, also working on a new tour. so potentially for '26 there are two new tours coming. and this kind of started, joe, three years ago. novak djokovic formed a union called ptpa, and he was trying to bring together a new tour. which nothing has happened. and obviously, with the saudis, with the liv tour what they've done in formula one, there is definitely something going, but tennis is, has been totally lacking for where golf has gone. prize money, we're in a 14-day tournament here, joe, and, at indian wells. the biggest non-grand slam tournament there is. they'll be over 600,000 fans from two weeks. winner gets $1 million. last week the bay hill golf
8:17 am
tournament, three years ago the prize money winner got $1.6 million. now because of liv, winner got $4 million. so it is absolutely driven up the price of pga and you've, you're missing half the players. hopefully the players, whatever happens if it becomes the new premier tour, the new saudi tour, players stand to get a huge windfall and much-needed. >> it's not going to be without controversy, i guess, bg. because it's the saudis, again, sports-washing. what i guess we, miscalculated, but are seeing it in media with streaming seeing how everything works, in live events you can't dvr them can't skip through ads. the most valuable content that's created. so everything was, in golf, obviously, what people were making was, what? totally lowballed and someone else making all that money. same with tennis.
8:18 am
so now would you, therefore, say that this is a good thing, even though it's the saudis? >> well, it's a good thing that we're getting the ball rolling. a couple things that are definitely, need to be addressed. both tours, the ceo, the atp and the wta, it doesn't work like this in professional sports that the ceo represents the players and the tournament. so that is a direct conflict of interests that the ceo represents both sides. that can neverish that is just a massive conflict of interests. the biggest difference between golf and tennis, joe, is every weekend when there's a major golf tournament, especially on the pga tour, it's on network television. so right now this tournament has an exclusive in the states only
8:19 am
on tennis channel. so -- which, doesn't have a massive cable subscription. it's a good channel, but they don't pay any tv rights to be on right now. so that's something in the near future that needs to happen. tennis needs to be, big tournaments especially, indian wells, miami next week, needs to beon major networks to take tennis to the next level where it deserves to be, in my humble opinion. >> yeah. billie jean brought parity a long time ago. nobody's getting paid what they should, men or women in tennis, one thing the for sure. obviously the top players are doing well, but the big thing in golf that's dramatically changed is the number 100 player. you know, ten years ago in tennis we were making similar money. now the number 100 player in golf is making more than the number 10 player in tennis.
8:20 am
so -- sometimes competition isn't good. sometimes competition is great. so hopefully besides this one saudi offer with the atp and wta, that now the grand slams are going to say, you know what? we don't want this to happen. we're going to get our own tour and try to get you onboard, but i honestly believe, becky, we've been talking about this for 40 years. talking about doing things in tennis since i was playing. since i had hair, back in the day, and nothing has ever happened. >> you had hair? >> i had hair back in the day. never like joe, but i had decent hair. >> i can send you to the right place, if you want this. >> no. i'm not hair club guy. i'm honest. >> kidding. i'm kidding. you'd have to go to god. we talked about god earlier. >> brad what do you think of the zeitgeistee, i don't know if it's in zeitgeist anymore. saudi in the penalty box among
8:21 am
human rights, among other things. brought up even by jay in terms of golf trying to push liv away. atp may be different. based in london, a very global and international sport. do people care? does that matter? are we overstating this issue? understating the issue, ow players will think about it how the audience will think about it? >> andrew, you're not going to please everybody on this decision. some people are totally against it. but this is a players' decision, what they're going to decide. how they're going to move forward. and they're taking, and doing it in boxing, ufc, formula one, golf has done it, and, listen, if they don't have this offer right now from saudi arabia, maybe this doesn't wake up the grand slams or wake up the other tournaments to get something going. so -- >> really interesting, though. you're really just looking at this as the competitive spark and, hey, set up and pay
8:22 am
attention and somebody start paying these players what they're worth? >> i totally think so, becky. the players right now in my humble opinion are completely getting the short end of the stick, and if -- if we get a same offer from the grand slams to do the tour, i would say, go with the grand slams, because they already control the four biggest tournaments, and that would make the most sense. so i am extremely hopeful that the grand slams now are, they're calling their tour potentially "the premier tour." so -- to me, there's probably no room for two tours. so hopefully they will figure something out, and the players will get the windfall, and, becky, one thing to keep in mind. women's tennis is by far the biggest women's sport in the world. there's not even -- like, of the top ten highest female earners in sports, i believe nine of them are tennis players. so tennis definitely has all the
8:23 am
eyes on the female side. >> yeah. >> and men's tennis, a big sport but nothing like you know, some of the other team sports, but i'm extremely hopeful this will get, you know -- >> leverage. >> get it going. >> yeah. this is leverage. >> there you go. exactly what we need. >> so you're with coco. are you able to calmly watch her matches? have you -- have you been able to achieve some type of zen where knowing you as i know you where i watch you and -- i can't even -- i have to turn off the tv and not watch. watching you watch the people you coach. are you better yet? is there a drug? what's happening? >> aww -- is there a drug? adrenaline? you know, coco had a tough one last not. got through. plays semis tonight. >> any fingernails at all? >> actually you know what? i've not been biting. in the morning i focus on stocks
8:24 am
in the morning. you know? >> okay. [ laughter ] >> bitcoin. bitcoin strategy. >> i'm not a bitcoin guy but i understand it totally. because, listen, everything is supply and demand. if people aren't interested, they're not buying or selling, then -- but the genius of bitcoin is so easy. it's like, you can't get it anymore. people buying and selling. >> your last big pitch, i told you no penny stocks. don't say that, but your stock was microsoft. wasn't it? you're a genius. >> microsoft -- i think microsoft now, been there ten years and telling you. the banks are -- like -- like, if you park your money in the banks you've lost your money. to me, microsoft is the modern bank. you get it, a nice dividend. could be better. wish it was. and you actually have a chance for growth. so i -- i tell my kids this. listen, park your money where
8:25 am
you have a chance for growth. microsofts and now with a.i. and everything they're doing, i think, to me is a genius company. and whether or not you're young or old, park your money there. i've had a little dumb luck, i must admit, with nvidia. the last year, and -- i won't calla penny stock by any means but i have a big position in onholding and we got smoked the other day on earnings. that's roger federer backed. do you have oncloud sneakers yet? >> no. i don't know that one and i'm going to have to check the price to see if you violated any of our -- >> well, it's a $12 billion company. >> okay. all right. that's good. that's good. okay. we got -- fine. i was going to ask what you've been telling coco? a life lesson to tell us about winning? you were winning ugly, all i know. >> you know, i told coco yesterday, i mean, she struggled
8:26 am
with her serve massively yesterday, and i don't know of any player that could have gotten through besides her yesterday. she's a tough cookie, incredibly resilient and she just competes. the thing about tennis is when you struggle you've got know teammates. it's about finding a way to manage yourself, joe when you're not playing at your best. >> like you. >> right. i try to do that with, with everybody i coach and hopefully they have more talent than me. >> all right. got to go. brad, good luck. good luck to coco. in a great part of the country. i love indian wells. good to have you on. instead of once a year for the u.s. open. good to see you. >> see you at the u.s. open. nice to have me on, in march. >> right. enjoyed myself. okay. e > coming up on the other sid of this breaking economic data. we're coming right back. this is "squawk box" on cnbc.
8:27 am
you know doug, ever since switching to workday you've been a real rock star. rock star? what do you know about rock stars? billy idol? i mean where's the skin-tight leather? my shoes are leather. where's the unnecessary zippers? that thing! billy, rock star is just how doug feels when he uses workday. thanks, rory. i'll show you rock star! be a finance and hr rock star. workday. for a changing world. billy idol just stole your golf cart!
8:28 am
[sfx: wind, rain and rolling thunder] [music up and under] ♪♪ crowd: get in! [crowd cheers] american announcer: justin rose has done it. british announcer: he's a 17—year old phenom. nobody's born with grit. british announcer: this is hard to watch. it's something you build over time. american announcer: that's 21 missed cuts in a row. [car trunk slammed shut] ♪♪ but creating a future only you can see, demands relentless pursuit. for 88 years, morgan stanley has offered clients the same determination
8:29 am
and forward thinking that define justin rose's career. because the only way to reach your full potential... american announcer: rose, back in the winners circle. ...is to pair the vision of what's possible ♪♪ with the grit it takes to make it happen. [crowd cheers] american announcer: he's done it! [music out]
8:30 am
among today's top business stories adobe falling postearnings after issues quarterly revenue guidance that disappointed the street. not including this morning's stock move adobe shares down. stock off by 11.3%. then there's mcdonald's suffering a system failure that left customers in parts of the world unable to order food. early this morning the website downdetector indicated a spike in reports of the mcdonald's app in australia and the uk. not related to a cyber security account and being revolved. and out an annual letter to shareholders. optimistic about 2024 and goldman stands to benefit at caste markets improve saying
8:31 am
inflation may be stickier than anticipated but economic conditions could be better if economic news continue to deteriorate. >> and steve liesman with numbers, please. >> import prices rising by 0.3%, joe. that is right in line with expectations. unchanged compared to january's 0.8%. that is unchanged, unrevised. export prices up 0.8 compared to the consensus up 0.2. export prices higher than expected. that is down, though, however from the january number of 0.9. non-pra toll yum input prices up not much. 0.2% and petroleum import prices up 1.7% versus january 1.8. looks like year over year negative. minus 0.8% year over year. we've been up to this point importing deflation or disinflation from the rest of the world. looking at the new york state
8:32 am
empire manufacturing survey. minus 20 point -- my a big miss. looking for minus 6. still a negative number. you can see new orders negative. prices paid up. prices received up. employment negative 7.1 as well as the workweek as well. so i'm looking here. the two-year and the ten have both been towards the higher side this morning. we had 4.28 on the 10 and 4.70 on the 2. looks pretty in in-line. where's that 10? 4-29, 4.71. looking at probabilities, guys. down below 60% now on that june probability. had been, i don't know, 16 earlier this week before inflation numbers came down to 60 trading 58. now. just 11 percent remains. still odds on bet for the june rate cut, but that's kind of wirthing as well.
8:33 am
becky? >> all right. steve, thank you very much. when we come back, what will it take for boeing to fix the list of issues raised by january's alaska airlines flight emergency? we will ask a former investigator for the national transportation setbod.afy ar "squawk box" will be right back. let's check it out. says here it gets plenty of light. and this must be the ocean view? of aruba? huh. this listing is misleading. well, when at&t says we give businesses get our best deal, on the iphone 15 pro made with titanium. we mean it. amazing. all my agents want it. says here...“inviting pool”. come on over! too inviting. only at&t gives businesses our best deals on any iphone. get iphone 15 pro on us. (♪♪) this is our future, ma. godaddy airo. creates a logo, website, even social posts... in minutes! -how? -a.i. (impressed) ay i like it! who wants to come see the future?! get your business online in minutes with godaddy airo
8:36 am
welcome back to "squawk box" pap few of the latest developments in the investigation to the boeing 737 max plug blowout failing more than 30 audits of 89 in a six-week investigation. the national transportation safety board saying security camera footage of factory work done on that doing plug in question last year now overridden. talked about that earlier. boeing saying like so many other companies it does not keep security footage for more than 30 days, but then ntsb chair says this will complicate its investigation. joining us right now is a former ntsb investigators, alan dale. good morning to you. what do you make of this, and how hard is it going to be to actually investigate this case? >> well, it's going to be complicated. certainly mr. calhoun knows there are people in boeing that
8:37 am
nope whether or not the paperwork trail actually existed. if they didn't do the paperwork he needs to tell the chairwoman. if the paperwork exists he needs to find it and turn it over to the ntsb. i agree with him about the video camera footage. the faa, for example, overwrites our own videos from air traffic control i think every 30 days. that may not be nefarious, but he's got to fess up and tell the ntsb what happened and when. >> right. alan, tell it to us straight. we read the headlines, it's very troubling for a lot of americans. folks around the world, who board these planes, and i think we don't really know or understand perhaps the way you would or do whether we should be genuinely concerned somehow the culture inside boeing is not of excellence, and is genuinely troubled, or is it something else?
8:38 am
>> well, certainly the culture needs to be addressed, and that's up to the new ceo, mr. calhoun. but, you know, keep in mind when you board an airliner today you've got one chance in 10 million of dieing. try to get those odds from your surgeon? it's not that dangerous, but it needs to be improved, and, you know, we need to remember charlie wilson's 1950 quote when confirmed as secretary of defense, what's good for general motors is good for the nation. we're going to have to help him get boeing back on track, and there are things both mr. buttigieg could do and the new faa administrator mr. dixon. >> what are those things? >> well, i think buttigieg should, because of the threat of whistle-blower harassment, we don't know what happened with john barnett who committed suicide several days ago. i think buttigieg should ask the fbi to investigate that just to
8:39 am
make sure we don't have a situation like ralph nader faced back in the '60s with the core of air and general motors put undue pressure on him were when he exposed the problems. so that's a job for the fbi to find out and certainly mr. buttigieg can assure of that. another thing quickly. dickerson -- dixon, excuse me, the faa administrator, could send a large group of former faa quality inspectors. maintenance inspectors. you could hire them pemptempora to go into the boeing plants make sure thing, back where they should be. boeing had a great reputation and it slipped when he messaged with mcdonnell douglas in this competitive world. they are struggling. >> alan, do you think they need different management? do you look at what's happened under dave calhoun and say these
8:40 am
problems are persisting? continuing, getting better, getting worse? >> well, there's a lot of inertia to this kind of situation. i think calhoun is trying to address this. he needs to do more to protect whistle-blowers and certainly needs to find those records and talk with the chairwoman of the ntsb, and either fess up. we never had the records. okay? another example of our failure of quality control. or the record -- >> i was going to say. don't have the records a quality control records read reports using dove soap and hotel card keys to check the seals and things. you know, between doors and things. i mean, does that make any sense to you what so ever? >> there's a lot of things that need to change, and i'm not sure getting another ceo in right now at boeing is what they need to do. let's give mr. calhoun a chance to fix this, but let's also get the government involved to ensure this vital company
8:41 am
survives and prospers, and there's a number of things, like i said we all need to do the government needs to do. as a former bureaucrat myself and a whistle-blower, i know you need -- you need to make sure people are talking to you, mr. calhoun, and you need to make sure you go back to quality control. it's back to basics at boeing. >> what do you mak broadly about government regulation of the airlines? you said the chances of getting, of an accident are uniquely low. knocking on, in this case the plastic -- the plastic in front of me. but i ask just because i think there's questions about, you know, whether we have enough folks inside the faa? what's happening in the towers these days? what kind of regulation or monitors are in place at a place like boeing at the airlines when doing different mechanical work and the like. what do you think of that?
8:42 am
>> well, clearly in 1978 when congress deregulated the airlines, they didn't give the faa anymore resources. so they didn't have the inspectors they needed and they still don't, in my opinion. i've worked with those guys in dallas. they're a great group. there's not enough of them. we also know there's controller shortages again. nobody -- wants larger bureaucracies but i think it would be wise to invest in people and, yes. both the ntsb who i think has just got authorization for 70 new employees, i think that's great. we need to look again at the controller shortage and the faa inspector shortage, but clearly calhoun has got to continue his leadership and clean up his act or the company's act, because boeing needs to come back for america's sake, and we can talk about the max aircraft, the 737 specifically some other time. it still needs a few fixes, i
8:43 am
can tell you about that. >> alan, he wasn't ceo but there for the whole fee average oh, on the board. you don't just date to when he started -- i don't know. everybody says the same thing. no. don't want to switch ceos in middle of a -- but -- what would it take for to you say, okay. yeah. they aren't talking to him. it's not working. things that need to be done at the top. you know what they say about fish? where it rots -- when do you finally say enough is enough? would you ever say that? >> well, yeah. if things don't improve in the next several months. >> it's been years already. already been years. five years. >> around, better start improving in the next several months or maybe they do need new leadership there in boeing. >> alan, appreciate your perspective on all of this and thank you for joining us this morning. have a great weekend. >> thanks so much for having me. coming up, disney+ getting swarmed by those looking for the
8:44 am
latest taylor swift fix. "new york times'" columnist jim stewart talking streaming with us after the break. of course, the latest on disney's board room drama. heading to break check out the shares of evmaker rivian. the stock getting an upgrade. earning and upgrade at pieper. or piper sandler upgraded it from neutral to overweight with the price target from $15 to $21. believes investing in rivian is risky but following the post fourth quarter sell-off likes the demand for the new rv and happy with the plan to delay cap x spending. stay tedun. you're watching "squawk box" on cnbc.
8:45 am
at pgim, finding opportunity in fixed income today, helps secure tomorrow. our time-tested fixed income suite, backed by over 145 years of risk experience, helps investors meet their goals. pgim investments. shaping tomorrow today. frustrated by skin tags? dr. scholl's has the breakthrough you've been waiting for. the first fda-cleared at-home skin tag remover clinically proven to remove skin tags safely in as little as one treatment.
8:46 am
8:47 am
8:48 am
have a seat on disney's board? the answer is simple -- if they succeed disney could suffer the same fate at other infiltrated such as ge and dupont. nelson pelts has a long history attacking companies to the ultimate detriment. >> in an attempt to fend off nels's pelts. issues a lengthy and spicy response in part saying this chargedanddisingenuous rhetoric seemed calculated to distract shareholders from disney's poor track record and sidestep accountability. okay. join us to talk about the late effort drama at disney and whether the new taylor swift film will move the needle for disney is a cnbc contributor who also wrote a book on disney. jim, i have been a little struck by how strong disney has come out against this attack. a lot of times you'll see big companies kind of playing like
8:49 am
they are above the fray. like they don't want to get dragged down to the activist level, but the ad we just showed is almost an election-style campaigning ad that really comes out and that's just the beginning what disney had to say about this. what do you think? >> i can't remember a recent proxy that has become this nasty and it is surprising given it's coming from disney. you know, one of the most admired best-known companies in the world. if there's any company you thought might have been able to sort of float above the fray i would have guessed it might be disney. that's not what's happening. i've done a pretty deep dive into nelson peltz track record at previous companies. however you feel about him, whether he should be on the disney board it's not true what the video said he's been destructive to value in other companies where he's been on the board. they've released figures that
8:50 am
show that the -- since when peltz goes on the board when they leave shares gain roughly 17% on average. substantially higher of the s&p over the period this is was formed. >> why do you think disney has taken this strident approach? >> well, >> well, i think there are a number of reasons here. first of all, i think, you know, no company -- and by the way, when i have talked to a lot of these people when he's been there, none of them were happy when nelson showed up as a shareholder. you know, management wants to continue their plans. they want a board that pretty much goes along with whatever they have to say, and they don't want someone barging in, asking tough questions, and then, by the way, taking credit in some cases for what they said they were going to do anyway. i think that's just human nature. but this goes a little farther than that. i think disney -- bob iger himself, as you know, had an unbelievably successful career
8:51 am
there, left, now has come back and is, you know, in round two, trying to save a company that is in very difficult circumstances, not through any manager's fault but through the changing nature of the industry and is in the middle of a turnaround plan, and i think he wants the credit for that. he thinks it's working, and the last thing he wants is someone like nelson peltz showing up, getting on the board, and then saying, oh, i'm the one. i got them to cut costs and do this. i solved the streaming crisis. there's not enough room in the room for these two egos. >> hey, jim, one of the questions that's been asked about the nelson peltz sort of scorecard is when you're measuring it. are you measuring it just when he's there on the board, in which case, i think there's no question that, actually, on the whole, the companies that he has been involved in have outperformed? i think the question becomes, and you know this better than i do, if you extend out the timeline, if you will, to when
8:52 am
he's not on the board, what happens after he leaves the company, and this sort of concept, and maybe you think it's a mythical concept or a mythical argument, but it's the argument that disney is trying to make, that in many of the circumstances, the stocks have fallen, and the argument is that during that period when he was on the board, they have done things that are short-term oriented to juice the stock. >> well, you know, obviously, you can affect the results by picking the beginning and the end time tremendously, but i think what peltz is saying is reasonable. it's not the only way of measuring return. and he has argued very strenuously that he is far from a short-term investor. he's not like the typical leveraged buyout artist. he's not looking to go in there and flip the -- do something quickly. i believe he's put out, in their white papers, that the average tenure of their holdings is about six years, which is pretty
8:53 am
long-term for -- he doesn't like to be called an activist investor either, but he is considered an activist investor, and that's pretty long-term. so, again, i don't think it's entirely fair to say he's just looking for short-term results. but there is no question that after he's out of these companies, some of them have not done as well, and he's still in a company like wendy's, which did very well initially, and now has been struggling somewhat. but yet, some of the tenures are really quite impressive. procter & gamble, heinz, kraft, spun off mondelez. these companies have done very well. >> hey, jim, i want to thank you for your time today. i wish we had more time, but next time. >> okay, great. we'll see how that turns out. coming up, a.i. winners and losersa , group of stocks you need to watch after a break. we'll be right back. nutes with the power of ai... ...with a perfect name, a great logo, and a beautiful website. just start with a domain, a few clicks,
8:54 am
and you're in business. make now the future at godaddy.com/airo ♪ unnecessary action hero! ♪ -missing punches? -unnecessary! and-check reversals?ss. -unnecessary! -time sheet corrections? -unnecessary! -unentered sick time? -unnecessary! -go! -unnecessary! -go! -unnecessary! -when you can take this phone, you'll be ready.
8:56 am
i firmly believe that all of these technologies are just going to be an accelerant. the state of the art as it relates to sora allows you to create these really small snippets of video, and the technology is maegamazing in tht now understands physics, it understands interactions. >> that was adobe's ceo speaking about the a.i. boom. joining us right now to talk tech and specifically stocks that he likes and doesn't like in a.i., good morning to you. what companies to you like, and
8:57 am
what don't you, given that it seems to be an all-in situation right now where there doesn't seem to be a lot of differentiation in terms of how people seem to be thinking about a.i.? >> yeah, good to be here, andrew. thank you. i think we're at a kind of "where's the beef" moment for a.i. where all the promise needs to be delivered this year. if you look at investors' reactions to several a.i. kind of stories in the past week, broadcom, marvell technology, oracle on monday, and most recently with adobe yesterday, what you're seeing is a reaction to slower growth than expected. just to spit some facts to you, revenue growth for the s&p i.t. sector for 2023 was only 2%. it trailed the s&p's 5%. and so, if you take out, also, nvidia's earnings estimates which were obviously blowing it away, from q1 estimates, the i.t. sector's earnings growth falls from 19 to 6%. now that interest rates reductions are really off the
8:58 am
table for the immediate future, anyway, it looks like, given ppi, cpi, jobs prints, i think investors are showing a much more discerning orientation to these names. adobe is a great company. it's had a good quarter, 12% revenue growth, 18% profit growth last night, but the issue, andrew, is that the stock's up 80% year over year, and for all the exciting things like fireflies, a.i. generative applications they're pulling into the suite, they didn't up their guidance, and it's not having a measurable additive imprint on the run rate. this was a business that was growing 20% year over year revenues. >> so, who do you think becomes a winner? we keep talking about how this is going to revolutionize the world, and i think it will in many ways, i just don't know if it all comes down to some of these companies or becomes a feature of all of these products. >> well, i think the first derivative, the chip makers and the hyperscalers.
8:59 am
we've seen that, nvidia, microsoft, aws, and most recently, oracle. oracle is guiding for 50% infrastructure cloud growth going forward because its use case was really generative a.i. that it needed for its superior tech stack. these names are all benefitting. it's the second, third derivative stories, which you mentioned, which it's -- technology is always competitive, and there's this, probably, assumption that's not correct that the new technology is just going to be additive. oftentimes, it just cannibalizes the existing, and that's why i.t. spend year over year isn't up, and that's why marvell and broadcom didn't show a lot of growth at the aggregate level, even though a.i. is growing nicely. so, i think what investors need to do is look for businesses where the a.i. imprint is really going to materially grow earnings and revenues going forward and not just be kind of a story that's cannibalizing the other tech spend. >> eric, i want to thank you for joining us. happy weekend, and appreciate your perspective on all of it. let's take a quick final
9:00 am
check on the markets right now. dow looks like it would open up about 43 points if we do it in about half an hour and it stays away. nasdaq would open off about 15 points. the s&p 500 up about 4.5 points. make sure you have a great weekend. it's been a long but good and crazy week. lot of news at this table, by the way. >> parting is such sweet sorrow. >> it is. make sure you join us next week. "squawk on the street" begins right now. good morning, and welcome to "squawk on the street," i'm david faber with sara eisen and mike santoli, we are at post nine of the new york stock exchange. jim and carl have the morning off. let's give you a look at futures as we get ready to wrap up the trading week 30 minutes from now when we begin. i don't know what that says. i guess the nasdaq might be down a little bit, mike? >> that's exactly what it says. >> i got it right. >> how many years have you been at cnbc? >> yes. a few. when they barely had a ticker, i go back so far
106 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
CNBC Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on