immunity for certain federal officials, including the president going back 40 or so years, so long as they're acting within the scope of their federal job, what we don't know is a is there any form of criminal immunity? supreme court's never actually ruled on that. and if so, was donald trump acting within the scope of his job? i don't think there's a good argument here that trump was within the scope of his job, but this is an unknown question and unknown issue and i think that's exactly why the supreme court decided that they needed to take this. remember, by the way, two months ago, jack smith said to the supreme court, only you can decide this case. you, the supreme court and you alone have to resolve this. >> all right. elie honig. thank you so much. appreciate it. much more reaction to his big break can you news ahead in the next hour? our coverage continues now, in the situation room with one wolf blitzer, i'll see you soon

claims major decision that certain further delay his federal election subversion trial tonight we're breaking down the massive impact of the high court's announcement. welcome to our viewers here in the united states and around the world. i'm wolf blitzer, a urine the situation room the skis cnn, breaking news. >> let's get straight to the breaking news. a pivotal moment in the special counsel's election subversion case against donald trump, the us supreme court announcing it will hear arguments on trump's claims of immunity. cnn's team of journalists is covering this truly historic moment from every angle. first, i want to bring in cnn's chief legal affairs correspondent, paula reid. paula, how is the supreme court taking this up? >> well tonight, wolf, it is

unclear or former president trump will face federal prosecution before the november election, because tonight the supreme court announced that it will hear your all arguments in late april on trump's appeal, where he argues that he has presidential immunity that should shield him from the federal we'll election subversion case. now this is the second time that the supreme court has rejected pleas from special counsel jack smith to step in and resolve this issue quickly so that he could move on with his case, months ago, jack smith asked the supreme court to weigh in on this issue of immunity, not to let it go through the appeals process and drag out they declined. the issue, went to the court of appeals, was issued a scathing and unanimous opinion rejecting trump's claims of absolute presidential immunity. now of course, trump's team appeal to the supreme court and it took them two weeks to announce the fact that they will hear arguments in this case, his arguments are scheduled though not until another two two months from now. which means we expect an opinion, possibly in late june

and then we need probably two months. the judge who said this, overseeing the case before they could begin that trial. so wolf that makes it unlikely, though not impossible, that the january 6 federal election subversion trial could go before november. and as we know, the trial i'm team strategy all along has been delay delay, delay. polo. >> so what specifically does this mean for the timeline of the classified documents case against trump? >> it's a great question, wolf, because while it's been a bad day for jack smith today, it could be a bad week because on friday will be down in florida when the judge who's overseeing that case, judge aileen cannon, she's holding a scheduling hearing currently, that trial is penciled in on the calendar for late may, but it is widely expected that's going to get pushed back and we expect to get some guidance on that on friday, but there is a concern that that could get pushed back multiple times, which again it's unclear at this point if former president trump will be tried on either

one of these cases, but we'll be watching very closely on friday to see what judge aileen cannon does with that case as of now the only criminal case that we are confident is going to go this year before former president trump is the so-called new york hush money case. the case related to hush money payments that he paid to adult film star stormy daniels and the lead up to the 2016 election, that case brought by the manhattan district attorney, that case starts on march 25th. >> all right. lots going on. i paul, i want you to stay with us right now. i also want to get some reaction to the us supreme court's decision. we're getting reaction from former president trump, cnn's kristen holmes is standing by. she's got details for us. so trump just reacted. i take it grist it on social media yeah, he just posted before i read it, i do want to note one thing i talked to members of his team and to some of his allies who also the same thing. they were extremely pleased currently with this decision. now that was twofold. one, because they wanted to present to their immunity argument, even though many of his advisers and allies actually don't believe that

this is going to hold up in court. they were happy you to get to present it. the other part of this is that delay, delay, delay. they believe that now it is very, very likely that they are going to delay this past the november election, which is of course, what their goal has been all along. so this is what donald trump posted on social media, and it just i just tone it down. give me one second. >> to pull it back up for you. okay. >> he says legal scholars are extremely thankful for the supreme court's decision today to take up presidential immunity without presidential immunity, a president will not be able to properly function or make decisions in the best interest of the united states of america, presidents will always be concerned and even parallel highs by the prospect of wrongful prosecution and retaliation after they leave office. this could actually lead to extortion and blackmail of a president. now, of course, as we know, the appeals court has already overruled this. now that decision is stayed at this point, they said that donald trump did not have absolute immunity and that presidents in

the past have acknowledged that they don't have absolute immunity, that they are beholden to the law. but again, this is something donald trump has become really fixated on. something that he sells to both the american public when he is at rallies, but also to private donors and in private conversations, something he wants out there and he wants out there, argued and again, the even bigger part of all of this wolf is that trial date. what they had been hoping for for all of this was that these trials would get pushed back after the election. now of course, there's cheers from doesn't win and then they have to address that then. but the hope is that donald trump does become president and then can dismiss these cases. they've been trying all their options really exhausting every legal avenue to push this and push this. and now this decision makes it likely it's going to be pushed several months, at least up butted up to the election or even passed it. good news for the former president potentially very good news for trump, indeed,

kristen, thank you very much. stand by. we'll get back to you. i want to bring in our legal experts for some serious analysis right now, jump biskupic, you're our senior supreme court analyst. two questions. why did it take the justices so long to decide here these important arguments about presidential immunity and when do you see a ruling coming from the us supreme court? >> okay. i'll give you a brief answer. due to the second first, and then a longer answer. the first, i think by the end of june, we should probably see an answer. but the question it's not surprising that the justices agreed to take this up. i thought they'd want to have the last word on it because it's such a big question of presidential immunity the dc circuit opinion was very sound. there were some arguments for just leaving it in place, and the fact that it took them about two weeks to even decide what to do suggests that there was some dissension behind the scenes, that there was enough people there number of justices who thought, let's not engage on this because they've put it on an expedited schedule to hear it. the week

of april 22 but every day counts when you're talking about briefing, if the justices were going to do that from the start, they should have done a two weeks ago when they had all the filings. and as i said, it suggests that there was some trouble there, but the bottom line, then we'll is no wonder donald trump is saying, thank you supreme court, because this actually makes the supreme court a bit of a partner of his, in his effort to delay things. why do i say the end of june then for a final ruling, cases that the justices will be hearing off the donald trump topic, that there'll be hearing that at the end and of april, we'll all be resolved by the end of june because that's when the session ends for the 2023, 2024 session. now it could go longer. they could actually decide this even sooner. but i think what we have now is a situation where obviously we're not going to see the start of any trial on these election subversion charges in early march. but i think at this

rate, we won't see a trial in summer and we might not see before the end of 2024, really, because because of this action trump and his lawyers have always said delay, delay, delay. so this is good news for definitely good news, potentially. all right, norm eisen is with as well as our cnn legal analyst let's talk a little bit about the special counsel, jack smith. this is a major setback. he wanted to move quickly on this. so how does this impact the specific charges he's filing against trump >> it may have a profound impact. wealth. there are still unknowns as joan knows let's including, we don't know what conversations went on in those two weeks about this schedule or the schedule that could follow, given the historic importance of this case, we have seen the court move quickly to decision in the past. in the usv nixon case even faster on the bush v. gore timetable a variety of important cases in the trump administration and the biden

administration. if you get faster decision, this is still a very expedited timetable for a major historic case at the supreme court. if you get a faster decision, judge tanya chutkin has said she will not take the political calendar into account in setting this trial. doj policy does not prohibit a trial taking place. now, it's key for the supreme court to move fast if this case is going to go to trial and you know, the other impact of this it's bad for jack smith, but alvin bragg has been saying his 2016 election case is an election in corruption case. it's an election interference case that's what he's going to argue to the jury that case just became a lot more important. and what that case is, the great debate is it a democracy case or a hush money one became even more important today. certainly did >> stand by steve vladeck is with us as well. steve, i know you study the supreme court

very, very closely. how do you read this decision that was just announced today? are you surprised? they're going to hear arguments in this case on this slide? but over timeline. that's about to unfold steve, we got. a technical issue. we're going to get back to you it's a serious situation. maybe you can answer that >> i think we hear steve steve >> steven >> wolff, the wonders of modern technology. we'd always thought that there was a chance that the court was but don't take this case up on an expedited basis. we had always thought it would consider treating president trump's application as an appeal. i think jones, right. this surprise is only that it took the better part of two weeks for the court to get to this result. and wolf, what that suggests is that there was an effort over the last two weeks within the court to find some kind of conclusive

resolution that didn't require the court to give it the full process. maybe there were four votes for that resolution, but there weren't five or six. and so i think the real tea leaf here is that there are a couple of justices in the middle, maybe a justice, brett kavanaugh, maybe a justice. amy coney barrett, who might not be sympathetic to former president trump's immunity claim, but wanted the full court to have the opportunity to receive briefing and argument. and we'll just really quickly on the time and point, yes, this is not as fast as a lot of people would want. this is about two weeks slower on the briefing schedule than what we saw in the colorado disqualification case, at least by historical standards, this is still pretty fast for the us supreme court. that's not going to satisfy those who are worried about the delay. this is going to bake in now to the generous has prosecution that's a fair reaction. but if we look at the court historically, this is still the court moving much faster than

president trump had asked it to. and then at least theoretically could have. >> we shall see what happens, paula, let me get back to you. the federal appeals court here in washington, completely shut down trump's arguments that he had absolute immunity. what will this mean for this case now? >> well, it's interesting in talking to sources in and around the trump legal team. none of them expect actually that the supreme court will overturn the appeals court ruling. not only was it unanimous, it was skating and appear to be written with contemplating the supreme court's review and making it easy for them to affirm their decision. but at this point, even as sources in and around the trump legal team telling me they don't expect to prevail on the merits here. they may prevail again on the strategy of delay. delay, delay because if former president trump is reelected and he hasn't been tried in either one of these federal cases. he can make them go away. and so far, it looks like even though they don't expect to win on the merits, they are winning on the logistics, on the tactics,

>> certainly are john, this marks the second time the us supreme court is weighing in on a major trump case that potentially could impact the 2024 presidential electorate after her argument since involving the colorado ballot removal case. so what's your assessment? >> well, you're referring to the fact on february 8th, they heard arguments over whether donald trump could be removed from state ballots as the colorado supreme court had ordered. all indications in that oral argument were that the justices were going to reverse the colorado supreme court. and a lot while donald trump to be on the ballot. but we haven't seen that ruling yet. i actually expect that to come soon because colorado and several other states are going to vote on super tuesday, or at least conclude they're voting on super tuesday, which is next week. so maybe we will see a ruling soon in that, but we do know where the court is headed with that. and that is allowed donald trump to stay on the ballot. >> and norm, i'm just curious, as somebody who really interested in history, we always hear that no one in our

country is above the law. but if the president gets immunity, potentially for committing some sort of crime, is he above the law? >> wealth the president will be above the law if they rule that way, but they're not likely to rule that way. if you look at the way they've written the question presented here, they adopted the dc circuit's narrowing principle. they're only talking about a 40 president? they have phrased the question in such a way that the answer can only be no. a president is not absolutely immune if this question is answered in the affirmative, then president a president of the united states can send seal team six out if he doesn't from the oval office to commit political assassinations, that can't be the law. the problem is the speed and so we must all hope that the supreme court

doesn't yield to trump's obvious delay tactics but that they need his delay with all deliberate speed and that middle block. john roberts, the chief, the consummate politician of the court, perhaps the kavanaugh, perhaps an amy coney barrett, that they understand the gravity here for that core fundamental american principle, and that they you don't wait until the typical end of june deadline, but move more quickly. yeah. good point. steve, do you think it was a mistake for the us justice department to wait years to act on this federal election case. >> no wolf, it's such a good question and i think it's just so hard for those of us on the outside to answer. i mean presumably there are reasons why it took the justice department as long as it did to bring these cases. but, you know, the sort of delay, delay, delay that paula mentioned has long been one so president trump's call and cars when it comes to litigation. and i think it's very possible that

we're going to look back and say, you know, that wasn't adequately accounted for. wolf. it's worth reminding folks though, that we wouldn't be in this position either in the trump colorado disqualification case or with all of this heading in the balance on the january 6, prosecution, if nine more senators had voted to convict president trump and disqualify him from office in his second impeachment trial in january 2021. so you know, i think it's unfortunate that we are at this point where we're pushed up against these clocks i think it's worth remembering that we've got here not just because the department of justice, at least two outside observers moved a little more slowly than we might have wanted but because the more conventional procedure that the constitution contemplates for removing a president for disqualifying him from holding future office for this this kind of conduct was not followed for what we're in the moment deeply political reasons. i think that all has

to be part of the conversation as we look back on how we got to this point in the summer of 2024, and that's going to be up to these nine us supreme court justices to decide everyone stay with us. we're staying on top of the breaking news, how the supreme court's decision to hear the immunity case is throwing further uncertainty right now into the presidential election. lots going on, stay with us. you're in the situation room backroom deals, cia secrets of fares, >> bribery, corruption, prostitution there's, so much more to the store. >> united states of scandal with jake tapper sunday at nine on cnn gets a smart center stage in his crushed by a baby grand piano you're replacing me customize and saved with liberty. liberty. >> he doesn't even have a mustache. >> only pay for what you need every day they recently changed

jobs or received arrays. make sure your taxes are being done 100% correctly. intuit turbotax's done millions of tax returns. so you can pinterest, they'll do yours right? with 100% accuracy guaranteed, visit turbotax.com >> the beauty of any martial arts teaches you discipline. you have to have a discipline to living a healthy life. i'm almost 70 years old. i practice martial arts and i take balance in nature. i started taking balanced nature three-and-a-half years ago, and i feel good. and if you feel good and you get to enjoy life a lot more balance in nature and it's a positive thing in my life. i'll keep on ticking it as long as i can. >> yet 35% off and $10 off any additional sets by using discount code safe when moderate to severe ulcerative colitis takes you off course. put it in check with voc, a once-daily pill when i wanted to see results fast were invoked, delivered rapids symptom relief, and helped lead bathroom urgency behind. >> check what you see, tried to slow me down. i got lasting steroid free permission with

rinvoq check. >> and when you see cause damage, greenville came through by visibly repairing my kole inlining, check rally good symptom relief, lasting steroid free remission, and a chance to visibly repair the colon lining, check check and check for invoking lower your ability to fight infections putting tb serious infections and blood clots, some fatal cancers, including lymphoma and skin cancer, death, heart attack, stroke in tears in the stomach or intestines occurred. people 50 and older with at least one heart disease risk let's factor have higher risks, don't take an allergic to invoke a serious reactions can occur. tell your dr. if you are may become pregnant what you see a check and keep it there with written ask your gastroenterologist about rinvoq and learn how abby can help you save students students of any age from anywhere >> using our technology to power different ways of mourning so in minds grow opportunities i am an unholy

terror, but lately it's just a ruse. i can't let them see. i'm happy. it's prime video. all my shows and movies are here. it's nonstop, joy boundless math convulsions of for volatile. >> so nice >> boston. >> all your streaming and one app with one password prime video, bind your happy place. >> what you're sap? >> that's why vision works, makes it simple to schedule an eye exam that works for you even if, you have a big trip to plan around. >> meghan, see you right now. >> that's convenient. >> vision works. see the difference when you're a small business owner >> you to doulas can be a log

that's why progressive makes it easy to see with commercial auto quote online. so you can take on all your other two dues. or you did see if you could say that progressive commercial.com erin burnett outfront tonight at seven on cnn closed captioning brought to you by rula law. i kind of brands up to 70% off retail at rula law.com at rubella. >> you never pay for these. the deals on top? >> before their car. job without all that today. >> we're back with the breaking news. the united states supreme court throwing a huge wrench in the special counsel's push to try donald trump on election subversion charges. as soon as possible. >> let's get >> some more analysis right now this time from our political experts, david chalian this is perhaps the most consequential case against trump. and now there's a very real chance it won't necessarily be decided before the presidential election in november. that's a huge benefit potentially for

trump, right? >> well, it's a huge benefit in two ways. if indeed it is not tried before november this is one of the two federal cases. and if he wins and he's president, he'll have it dismissed, didn't have to go away and it will be as if it didn't exist. so there's that piece of it, but, but in terms of the campaign, donald trump has proven across all these trials to utilize them as the clock is ticking, as a way of fortifying his base of support now, there's a question. if indeed one of these trials went forward and he was convicted of a crime related to trying to overthrow an election and upend our democracy that, that may have real-world political impact on independents, moderate republicans, what have you in this race, we don't know that to be sure wolf, but that would be hanging out there and we would not learn that if this trial does not happen until after the election, it would stay in this space where donald trump would use it as a foil

rather than actually being held to account by the justice system. >> gloria borger is with us as well. gloria, the special counsel, as we know, jack smith, he first asked the high court to take this case up in december. what do you make of the way the justices have slow-walked? what's going on in this case, specifically? >> well, i think if i were jack smith, i would not be happy tonight because he wanted them to just accept the appeals court ruling, get going with this case and have it done before the election. as we all know the convention the republican convention is in july and there's kind of an unwritten rule in the justice department that you don't want to intrude on the electoral process. and the more this is delayed, they're going to reach a certain point where they're going to say, well, we can't cross this line because we're getting involved in the election trump is already

claiming election interference at every given opportunity and so this is, this is a real setback. now, i've talked to a former trump attorney who doesn't believe that they would win this case. but the question is, when are they going to get a decision on this case? and that's why the trump legal team is very happy tonight, because the supreme court is not known for moving quickly, even when it says it's going to do things on an expedited basis, which i'll see you. >> van jones, the attorney general, merrick garland he was in charge of this investigation. what for almost two years before appointing jack smith as the special counsel, did he make a mistake and dragging his feet on this >> yeah. yeah, he did. >> and honestly, i think he was trying to merrick garland trying to duck out. it was really the fact that congress wouldn't let it go oh, congress kept investigating, kept investigating, and then sent over 15 phone books worth of evidence that donald trump

brought the loss of. now we're two years late getting started. and then the supreme court just does whatever they can help donald trump. in december, they said they don't want to hear from you from the case. then it goes to the appeals court. they could just say, listen, the appeals court has spoken it is a ludicrous theory. ludicrous theory. now. oh, well now we won't hear it. it just is donald trump getting away with nonsense, taking advantage of everything that he can to get away with this crime. and the justice justice department did no favors to justice, dragging their feet for two years and having congress pushed them so late to get going alyssa farah griffin is with us as well. alyssa voters now could potentially go to the ballot box, not knowing whether one of the major candidates is actually guilty of trying to overturn the last presidential election, right? >> yeah, it's, it's a disaster for voters. we know as many as a third of republican voters who will be inclined to support trump couldn't be with him if he was convicted as a felon and they very well made go into the

voting booth and november and have no idea because this case won't be resolved. and i want to speak to something that norm said in a previous segment. we do know that this new york hush money case will get resolved before the election. but talking to republican voters around the country, this case just does not resonate with them. they see it as old, they see it as dated, something that dates back to pre-2016. it doesn't move the needle. what does move the needle as we've seen from exit polls, is a conviction in the january 6 case, and we very well likely not see that now interesting, gloria, this trump's strategy of delay, delay, delay, delaying these criminal cases past the november elections. it seems to be working at least so far. >> yeah. >> it's working in our polling shows that the american public wants a resolution of one of these cases. and i think this would be one of the most important case of which would be whether he was trying to overturn an election. and the voters want some resolution the

voters want some, some, the court to decide and if the appeals court wasn't enough, the supreme court is now going to do it. and, you know, it's going to it's going to delay, which is a victory for donald trump because of course, the theory is if he were to win the election then this whole thing would become a moot point and it is unfair to the voters who would like to know the answer to some of these questions. i agree with alyssa. they're not they're not much concerned about the stormy daniels case. but they are concerned about this case. and the more they know about it, the better off they'll be. but the supreme court moves at its own pace, which is often glacial and wolf, i think there's a big question mark that hangs on this time and gloria reference that justice department tradition of not prosecuting, not invited misty gating during an election season. the judge in this case, judge chutkan, has said that his status as a

presidential candidate will bear absolutely nothing on the trial in her courtroom. i don't know. to me, it's just a big question that we don't know. it's almost unfathomable in a ryan's, but there he is the potential there is no rule that says a trial can't take place in the fall here concurrently with the general election. and just think about what that would be if this actually did go to trial simultaneously with the fall campaign season. >> this is clearly a huge, huge development, everyone. thank you very, very much. excellent analysis coming up. >> we're >> got new reaction to the decision today from the us supreme court, a former member of the january 6 select committee, congressman adam schiff, will join us live. we'll be right back. >> we never get a pool with dr. time. you get the real deal of time, real deal maker much you've customized the real down payment and monthly payment of the car you want to buy a super smart and the deal you make on your phone is the deal you paid

get the real deal had drive him.com. >> is he i get discounts for my safe driving less and absolved from progressive. i even got a discount for signing up >> great. >> should we go now while i'm holding my phone nursery we can hit the road as soon as i see some seat belts. >> yeah. >> one in five children worldwide are faced with the reality of living without food no family dinners special treats, not enough energy to play all around the world. hunger is affecting children's physical and mental health. toddlers are suffering from acute malnutrition we stunt their growth kids are forced to drop out of school so they can help support their families conflict, inflation and climate have ignited the worst famine

in our lifetime. and we are fed up >> fed up that hunger devours dreams fed up that hungary destroys joy. fed up with the fact that hunger eats child help us the futures of children all over the world by visiting, get fed up now.org for as little as $10 a month. >> you can >> join save the children and as we support children and families in desperate need of our help now is the time to get fed up and give back. when you joined the cause, your $10 monthly donation we shouldn't can help communities in need of life-saving treatments and nutrients prevent children from dropping out of school >> support >> our work with communities and governments to help children go from short-term surviving long-term, thriving and now, thanks to special government grants every dollar you give in multiply up to ten times the impact that means more food water, medicine, and

help for kids around the world you'll also receive a free tote bag to share your support for children and having your childhood eaten away by hunger is unimaginable. get fed up >> call us >> now, or visit, get fed up now, today >> forced to be recommended. >> know, maggie saquon. >> do your business bank account with quickbooks money. now, earns 5% apy, 5% apy. >> that's new yep. >> that's how your business differently >> meet noodles >> she's barred short hair. >> and part ninja. >> meet the bissell cross wave hydro steam. its part vacuum

is it possible to count on my internet like my customers count on me? it is with comcast business. keeping you up and running with our 99.9% network reliability. and security that helps outsmart threats to your data. moaire dida twoo? - your data, too. there's even round-the-clock customer support. so you can be there for your customers. with comcast business, reliability isn't just possible. it's happening. get started for $49 a month. plus, ask how to get up to a $800 prepaid card with a qualifying internet package. don't wait, call and switch today! >> go to deal dash.com right now and see how much you can save united states of scandal with jake tapper. sunday at nine on cnn. >> more now on the breaking news, the united states supreme court says it will take up

donald trump's claims of presidential immunity, a temporary but significant victory for the former president, which is certain to delay his election. subversion trial katelyn polantz is covering all of this for us. so this impacts kaitlan, the timing for all of trump's potential legal cases. at&t, who decides when the trials will start, right >> well, if it's the judges who decide that is ultimately where this is going to land. and right now, the case is with the supreme court. it can't go anywhere. until the supreme court decides what to do if they side with donald trump case dismissed. that's it in this 2020 election federal case against trump. but if they don't side with trump and they side with what the lower courts have done. it goes back to judge tanya chutkin in the dc district court. she has said that his campaign would not would need to yield to the justice system that's just a day job of him campaigning. and so then we look at the trial calendar and judge chutkan

would have to decide exactly when she wants to have the trial. >> it could >> go any time and the election day on the calendar doesn't mean anything really to through the justice system when a judge is looking at something like this, and there are judges, not just judge chutkan that are going to try and pin down dates for donald trump to go to trial in his cases. >> the >> only one solidified right now is his new york hush money criminal case for business records, falsification. that's set to go to trial at the end of march. and then wolf the end of this week on friday much of our team is going to be in florida watching to see what happens with that other criminal case. the classified documents case, when that is going to land on the calendar. yeah. >> well, it's a legal stuff going on. kaitlan polantz. thank you for that update for more on the breaking news right now, i want to bring in democratic congressman adam schiff of california pardon your congressman. thanks so much for joining us. so first of all, what's your reaction to this decision from the us supreme court to even take this case and hear these arguments about presidential immunity

it's really hard to understand the decision will accept that it is likely some of the justices simply want to assist donald trump and >> delaying the resolution of this case in the hope of pushing his trial off past the election if that were to happen, then of course donald trump would try to, if successful the election, make the whole case go away. and i say that as a very he likely motivation for some of these justices because there's no reason to take this case. the legal and constitutional issues are not difficult. if a present this immunized in trying to overturn a presidential election, that would mean that any subsequent president could call out the military could seize ballot boxes. and if they were ever prosecuted for it they would be held immune. and that would be the end of our constitutional system. the ultimate check and a president's power is the ability to vote them out of office. you take away voters ability to do that by saying your immune from essentially trying to overturn the election. and it's chaos so

first, the supreme court says to the special counsel we're going to make you go to the court of appeals, even though you've asked us to decide this in an expedited basis, and then they do go to the court of appeals. they get a very sound judgment. unanimous. three, judge opinion very well-reasoned. and they say, okay, having sent you the court appeals, now we're going to take up the case anyway. hard to include. it's not for the purposes of delay >> i want to play for you, congressman, one of the arguments that the trump attorneys made before the lower appellate court listened to this could a president order seal team six to assassinate a political rival that's an official act in order to seal team six, he would have to be and would speedily be impeached and convicted before the criminal >> yes or no question? could a president who ordered seal team six to assassinate a political rival who was not impeached he be subject to criminal prosecution >> if he were impeached and convicted first, answer. your

answer is my answer is qualified. yes >> sources tell cnn congressman that even trump's lawyers don't necessarily expect to actually win on the merits of this case. what do you think? i don't think they expect to win either. that's such an absurd argument. the extension that argument is you could murder the senate majority leader, prevent an impeachment trial going forward. and therefore protect a president or former president from any kind of criminal liability that's absurd. i think they know they're going to lose this case, but as we have seen from trump lawyers in case after case after case, long preceding his presidency. but during his presidency now after his presidency, the goal is to deny justice by delaying justice and they may just succeed if the oral arguments are in april and a decision doesn't come out until may or june and judge chutkan at the district court says they're going to have three three months after that to prepare. then you're right in the fall up against the election that bumps up against

the department of justice policy of not normally taking legal action close proximity to elect an election. i think the issue here is the proximity to the election is because of the defendants own conduct, his effort to delay the proceedings in that case. i would hope that the trial goes forward whenever it gets sent back to judge chutkan, you have any issue congressman, with the amount of time it actually took for the us justice department to bring this case against trump i do absolutely. and indeed, during the first year, a year-and-a-half, raise this issue continually that the justice department seemed to be only proceeding against those that broke into this building where i'm standing and a battered down those doors in front of me to the house chamber or tried to they went after the foot soldiers, but it was a very long time before they went after those who had essentially organized and incited this attack on the capitol that was a very costly

mistake. and probably, but for the work that we did on the january 6 committee and forcing the department to confront that evidence of trump's can complicity. he might not have been charged at all. >> will you accept the supreme court's ruling regardless of which way they decide >> i don't think we'll have any choice but to accept the court's ruling but here, i think the court's ruling is going to be he has no immunity the problem is, can we accept and live with the delay? and i don't think we have much choice here. once again, donald trump trying to run out the clock, we have to hope and pray that voters reject him when they have a chance to vote this november so that if the justice department and justice has not been served, that it will be served after the election >> congressman adam schiff, as usual. thank you very much for joining us. thanks wolf coming up, we're following the supreme court's bombshell decision to hear donald trump's presidential immunity case. we'll have a deeper look into the controversial issue right after this at morgan

stanley, old school hard work. meets bold new thinking to help you see untapped possibilities and relentlessly work with you to make them real >> a lot of people asked me kathie lee, what are you doing these days? well, i have a new farm. i'm working too much. >> i'm going strong. i'm doing the things i love to do. and now i can do it on my own schedule, but you know what helps me the most everybody balance of nature. it's such a simple concept and it works beautifully. you want to make a huge change in your life to trial, balance of nature yet 35% off and $10 off any additional sets as a preferred

customer by using scout code. >> boom. >> sometimes the lows of bipolar depression field darkest before dawn with cap later, there's a chance to lead in the light kept lighter is proven to deliver significant relief across bipolar depression. unlike son man medecins that only treat bipolar, one kept lighter, treats both bipolar 1.2 depression and in clinical trials, movement disorders and weight gain were not common. >> call your dr. about sudden mood changes, behaviors, or suicidal thoughts, antidepressants be increased these risks and young adults, elderly dementia patients have increased risk of death or stroke, report fever confusion, stiff or uncontrollable muscle movements, which may be life-threatening or permanent. these aren't all the serious side effects. >> calculator can help you lead in the light. ask your dr. about kept blida find savings and support at kept blida.com at st. jude the, mission is just something that everyone can truly get behind the bridge were just regular people donating. and i think it's cool to be able to make a

difference in someone's lives in a way that is meaningful. >> progressive makes it easy to save with a quick commercial auto online so you can get back to your monster to-do list. >> really get a >> quote, progressive commercial.com, don't just good fit, get hardcore fit. keith schipper 28 pounds and got rid. now, you can get hardcore results too, with the new shredding stack from hydroxy cut, america's number one selling weight-loss brand. don't just get fit good hardcore fit >> yellows, not going to fly, but the left >> there's >> toothpaste wife and there's chris 3d white strips way to save a pre-puberty percent

over real stone and even more during our winter sale >> i'm fred pleitgen in teheran and this is cnn our top story tonight, donald trump's claims of presidential immunity. we'll get a hearing before the united states

supreme court in april. a blow to special counsel jack smith that could significantly delayed trump's criminal trial i want to bring in cnn's brian todd right now. he's a closer look at trump's immunity claims. brian, update our viewers, wolf, that term presidential immunity is a lightning rod phrase which some people believe implies that a president could be above the law. but experts say that's really not the case. former president trump's arguments center on the idea that a president should not be sued for an act committed during their time in the white house >> philosophically, the heart of the argument on this immunity is that a president has to be able to move forward, make decisions and a pretty rapid pace. and he can't be subject to loss suits for any act that he takes, whatever act that is that he can't be tied up in court rather than being acting as president. >> the supreme court has barred civil lawsuits against a president for official acts while in the white house, but hasn't addressed whether

criminal charges can be filed. president richard nixon tried to invoke limited it presidential immunity over judicial orders in 1974, when he tried to avoid handing over his white house tapes to the special counsel investigating the watergate scandal. he didn't try to invoke immunity over criminal prosecution. >> the supreme court in the summer of 1974 swept all these arguments away. and said that richard nixon had to turnover, the tapes. >> nixon did hand over the tapes which contained evidence that he was involved in the watergate cover up shortly after that, he was out. >> i shall resign the presidency effective at noon tomorrow. >> after leaving the presidency in his iconic 1977 interviews with journalist david frost, nick since seemed to indicate he thought he was above the law while serving as president or when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal >> but analysts say nixon was not claiming absolute presidential immunity. >> he was specifically referencing a band of national security related decisions that

a president can make. and the broad sweep of presidential power. now the courts have since disagreed with him. >> defenders, responding to the previous appeals court ruling that he's not immune from prosecution, former president trump at the time called it a quote, nation destroying ruling, posting on truth, social well, that if it's not overturned, it would injure the presidency and the country wolf. now we'll see what the supreme court does. the stakes clearly as i keep saying, are enormous right now, brian todd. thank you very, very much. let's dig a little bit deeper right now. cnn anchor and chief legal analysts, laura coates is joining us. laura, what's your reaction to this major decision by the us supreme court? putting the timeline of the january 6 trial in jeopardy >> this is truly mind-blowing given that they delayed this decision by about two weeks, even take up the case and a separate tech and effort, but was requested by jack smith. but you know, what time is it in london right now because americans till june or whatever

this decision comes on we'll actually have a king. what do i mean by that? well, if you don't know whether the president, the united states has absolute immunity, guess what? you don't know whether your system of checks and balances will actually work. remember what they argued before the circuit court of appeals, wolf, they talked about the possibility of only having life i ability or prosecution exposure. if you were first impeached and convicted, that means that unless you have that particular formula, which we know as checks and balances and a political discussion, then you have no real check on the president of the united states. the court of appeals lawn just hyperbolic discussions to them and scenarios and they were met with absurd results and answers that tells me that right now by super tuesday, we don't know whether a president of united states or former president united states is going to have absolute immunity for those who

think this is just an issue about donald from i would behoove you to know that. that also means that any behavior right now that president biden is being accused of engaging in unless they're able with an impeachment inquiry, for example, to have an impeachment and conviction that would mean that anything he is doing right now is fair game as well under this particular peculiar theory of having carte blanche for president of the united states. so the stakes are very high. i'm really surprised at the supreme court, given that 50 plus page opinion from the lower court, very thorough, very fulsome, but i suspect we'll have the same conclusion reached in the end. would want to have their own bite at the apple as opposed to allowing that lower court ruling to stand, which would be the result if they did not take up the case. >> laura, do you see a world where the special counsel's january 6 trial against trump would begin before the 2024 election. >> it is a slim chance because you have not only the beginning

of a trial to contemplate, but the conclusion we know this is going to likely take whenever it gets started, if it gets started to take a very long time with jury selection, to take a long time with the motion practice, to get back on the tracks but you are going toward to be trial ready. and then you've got the presentation of evidence, not only from the prosecution, but remember, the defense would likely want to mount a defense. all the burden is not theirs, and you've got a rebuttal case to work there, then you've got jury deliberations so even if this trial were to start before the november general election and of course, trump would have to be sitting during that particular trial. the federal case, after all, even if that were to be happening, is it likely that you'd have a conclusion and that politically for so many voters is what they would like to have. but i want to take a step back just once again. remind people that this is not simply about whether and who should be the president of the united states. it's not about the electoral outcome. it is about are very foundational

system of a democracy. >> we are >> founded on this premise of checks and balances. but if you have the president of united states without the ability to be he checked even with the political solutions not being met with a impeachment or beyond. and you really have a reduction to a monarchy. and i thought that's not what we wanted. yeah, good point. that laura coates. thank you very, very much, laura, of course. we'll be back later tonight, 11:00 p.m. eastern with her program, laura coates live. we'll be watching just ahead, new details on president biden's health following his annual physical, what his doctors are now saying about whether he needed a cognitive test everywhere, but the seat to seat is level now and to get a, you love your bike. we do too. that's why we're america's number one motorcycle insurer. you have to wedge it in everything. >> i don't do that reminds me of my blank >> the wolf was about the size of my new motorcycle have you

seen it by the way? >> but i ground >> really look of brushstrokes bottle the line of a gas tank the problem of plus one consumer cellular. this is sam tell me healthier >> this is a button. >> well, somebody's but just thought i wish you know, that would consumer cellular, you can get the same exact coverage as the leading carriers. but for up to half the price washington's proposed capital regulation comes with a steep price tag and they're forcing americans to foot the bill. their new plan will make loans more expensive increasing the cost of mortgages and car payments than it will hurt all businesses, making it harder for them to access credit, meet, payroll, and run their operations. phol woke budgets are already stretched by inflation and an uncertain economy washington needs to know this capital regulation is another bill that americans can't afford >> drive time.com. >> we've >> been hard at work and we

>> finally did you make it so i can finally see my real payments and shop at thousands of cars were no hit to my credit yeah >> good advantage on desktop and get approved with no credit hit >> turbo tax now offers a lifetime guarantee when you file your taxes, terror attacks guarantees 100% accurate calculations, audit support, and maximum refund for the full seven year lifetime of your tax rate they turn visit turbotax.com >> the rise >> sanders winter boot sale is now on for limited time visit. sanders.com or call 1-800 sandals live life. >> well, where every day feels

like a vacation, valencia in florida, like gl hubs premium 55 plus living in for prime florida locations, gorgeous homes from the 400s to 2 million world-class resort style living 24/7, huge clubhouses on-site dining, pickleball, and more effortless it's low maintenance living, silence, you live his attack

lead to irreversible organ damage. you can see your pain, but please believe it this is cnn. >> the world's news network >> there's more breaking news here in washington, the white house has now released a summary of president biden's annual physical checkup this will likely be the final update on his health before the 2024 presidential election, where polls show his age is a major issue for voters cnn, senior white house correspondent mj lee is following all these developments for us mj. what can you tell us? >> well, we have a new six-page letter from the president's

physician following his annual physical and the big takeaway. is that the president is feeling just fine and that there are no new issues since last year his annual physical. we already knew about some of the issues that the president is currently being treated for, including sleep apnea and a-fib. we also know that he's been taking a eloquence, which is a kind of blood thinner. it also goes into describing his stiffens gate. it recommends that he continued physical therapy and do more stretching. his weight is somehow remarkably exactly the same as last year. and it says that the president exercises five times a week. so all in all, in summary, the president's dr. saying that he is a healthy, active, and robust, 81 year-old male mj. >> what is the president saying about this? >> yeah, you know, we've seen the president sort of trying to swat away any concerns about his age, his mental fitness. and we saw a moment like that playing out earlier today here at the white house. this is what he told reporters

>> and you know >> that some people have encouraged the president to perhaps consider taking a cognitive test to put some of these questions to rest. and white house press secretary karine jean-pierre there are a said that it was his doctors that determined that that test wasn't necessary. and this was her explanation for why the president doesn't need a cognitive test that is not my assessment of that is the assessment of the president's dr. if you look at what this president the president who is also the commander achieve, he passes a cognitive test yes, every day there is not a precedent for bringing the dr. to the podium. we're trying to get back to the norm that it was used to be where doctors don't come to the briefing room norm or not, it certainly does seem like a fair and reasonable requests for the president's dr. to take questions directly from reporters given that the president is 81 year-old years old, and given all of the interests and concerns about

his age well, i read the report from the president's physician physician to the president and it's very, very specific, very detailed. mj lee at the white house. thank you very much. other news we're following right now. senator mitch mcconnell announcing he'll step down from his role in republican leadership this coming november, our chief congressional chorus manu raja is joining us right now. give us the latest yeah, for nearly two decades, senator mcconnell has led the senate republican conference being central to his party's strategy and its tactics. the longest serving party leader in history. but when he announced today that he would step aside after the november elections, he said essentially it was time when i got here i was just happy to anybody remembered my name president reagan called me michel donald. if you would have told me for two years later but i would stand before you as the longest serving

senate leader in american history frankly, i would've thought you'd lost your mind. but father time remains undefeated i'm no longer their young man sitting in the back hoping colleagues would remember my name it's time >> the next generation hello, leadership >> mcconnell's played a central role in so many key decisions, one of which keeping the supreme court seat vacant when brock obama tried to fill it, allowing donald trump to shift the supreme court to the right other, his feet feud with donald trump in the aftermath of january 6, calling trump morally and practically responsible for the attack that day, i put the question to republican senators about mcconnell how's legacy >> i think mcconnell's supreme moment leadership is after scalia's tragic deaths mutely made the announcement we're gonna let the american people decide the direction of the court. i think that is right choice. he said after january 6, trump was morally and practically responsible for it.

do you agree with them and they got anything to do with this decision and i don't i think the peanut degree with his sentiment, people committed crime. people committed crimes on that day are responsible for the crimes they committed simple as that >> and now this will open up a leadership race to succeed them. we expect three candidates, at least to jump in the race. senators john thune, senator john cornyn, and senator john grasso, each of them have already begun talking to their college, stealing them out. but wolf, this is going to be a secret ballot election after the november elections. so it's uncertain who is the favorite here? there are who will ultimately win here. but a significant moment here in the united states senate with mcconnell's steps down. and now a leadership race to succeed, a very significant indeed been a razo up on capitol hill thank you very much. and to our viewers. thanks very much for watching. i'm wolf blitzer in the situation room. i'll also see you tomorrow, 11:00 a.m. eastern for cnn newsroom once again, thanks very much for watching erin burnett outfront starts right now