pharmacist about the pfizer vaccine for pneumococcal pneumonia at morgan stanley old school hard work meets bold new thinking to help you see untapped possibilities and relentlessly work with you

cardia.com or amazon limit of waters cable ready to show the world how good i am. >> i trained all over the globe. >> and that's what you're going to see an aw, whole, whole different beast. we wednesday night dynamite it aid on tbs closed captioning is brought to you by sokoloff law mesothelial ma victims call now $30 billion in trust money has been set aside. >> you may be entitled to a portion of that money. all when 8085920400. that's when 8085920400 welcome to cnn news central at any moment,

president joe biden will hold a joint news conference with ukrainian president volodymyr zelenskyy at the g7 summit in italy this is a high-stakes moment for the alliance. >> both leaders are trying to shore up support for ukraine's defense against russia. >> and they're expected to discuss a new long-term security pact between washington and kyiv. the comes as former president trump spoke just minutes ago after meeting with republican lawmakers on capitol hill cnn's mj lee and nic robertson are both in italy covering the g7 summit, mj to you first, what are we expecting to see in here with biden and zelenskyy? >> briana we are running just a little bit behind schedule, but the stage is set behind us at this hotel in southern italy where the president is staying for that joint news conference between president biden and president zelenskyy, of course, coming on the heels of some major moves by the g7 and the united states this week to try to shore up global support for

ukraine. and when the two leaders take the stage, we expect that they're going to approach the table that is at the middle of the stage, and that is where they will sign that new bilateral agreement between the two countries. it says that the two countries will cooperate for ten years. on important issues like the production of weapons and military equipment, the training of armed forces and intelligence sharing, and it's really important to underscore just the sense of urgency here that is in place for both of the leaders, of course, president zelenskyy has made really clear how much he is depending on this kind of boosted support from all of the other countries that are supporting ukrainians. war efforts to try to gain momentum on the battlefield. and then for president biden, all of this is coming out a moment where he is just facing his reelection several months away. and of course, is very, you know, understanding of the fact and sensitive to the fact that,

you know, if there is a second donald trump term that raises a whole lot of questions about what could happen to the us's support for ukraine as well as some of the actions that have been taken here at the g7 this week. now, the president is expected to take two questions from to reporters, as is typical at a so-called two and two press conference, where two liters are on stage. of course, no shortage of questions, both related to foreign issues and issues at home for the president to be asked about. >> i'm joe biden was also just asked whether he's confident that there will be a ceasefire deal in gaza soon. how did he respond? >> yeah, boris, for all of the discussion about the war in ukraine this week at the g7, the other conflict that has been consuming so much of the president's time, of course, is the conflict in israel and what the president just told reporters is that he is not confident that a ceasefire deal

well, it can be reached soon, though he did add, i haven't lost hope. so this is the president publicly confirming what had become really evident. the last couple of days that the ceasefire negotiations that have been ongoing for so many months appear to have once again stalled after hamas responded to the latest israeli proposal also requesting additional changes. we did see secretary of state antony blinken earlier this week expressing frustration at the state of the developments and really even questioning whether the group is interested in the war coming to an end. and this certainly has to be a really frustrating moment for president biden as well, who has put so much on the line and as he tried, has he has tried to navigate this war and has certainly paid a political price at home throughout the course of the war as well all right, mj. >> thank you so much and obviously will be monitoring the president there to see when he does begin his remarks. as you said, he's running a little late. that is not unusual

let's go to nic robertson it's in nic president biden says he's not confident a ceasefire will get done soon. is that the sentiment that's being shared among the rest of those leaders at the g7 yeah, it is the g7 leaders, of course, signed up to president biden's proposal, little over will almost two weeks ago. >> now, there was there was broad agreement here from this group of leaders that this was the right approach. and i think pretty much they all followed the same view that the pressure was on hamas. they were all signed up the idea that pressure should be put on hamas to commit itself to agreeing to this, to agreeing to the terms. now of course, what hamas is saying is that they have come back with some proposals. they're saying that this is them being constructive, but the read it's very clearly that the option here was for them to end the war and the suffering of the people in gaza and begin to move towards the

things that they want, like the humanitarian access, like the ceasefire, like the withdrawal of israeli forces. but of course, there was a lot of detail that wasn't made public, and some of that appears to have been what hamas was pressing for. but i think you'll find in europe at the moment a degree of frustration, just like the united states. and this is having an impact on politics and life for people on the streets in all communities. it may not have the same, quite the same political implications that it's having four for president biden in the upcoming presidential elections. but for example, look at the uk elections that are coming up on 4 july. >> there certainly people candidates, independent candidates who are putting themselves forward because they don't think the current government or even the opposition is doing enough to support the people in gaza. and therefore, they're likely to

take votes away from the labour party who are expected to get voted into. this is something that all these leaders there's a feeling at the moment neck pivoting back to ukraine. >> what's your sense among g7 liters about the urgency they feel to get aid into ukraine as soon as possible, given what we've seen, are setbacks recent setbacks on the battlefield against russia no, look if there really frank, the answer is, there was a huge amount of frustration watching the united states go through for them painfully long and torturous process so get the money approved for that big commitment of 60 billion that kate finally came through a month or so ago. >> it wasn't that the european union had plain sailing with their plans to put 50 billion, commit 50 billion worth of

military and other support to ukraine. there were a couple of european union members, hungry. one in particular, who were against, against supporting ukraine in this way. so they had their own problems there there was frustration watching the united states go through. it's, process of making that aid available. but the real hello t now for them is the concern that there could be a change in presidency. so whatever is agreed here potentially could get overturned if if it were donald trump got elected and took decided to withdraw the level of support he has for nato level of support that there is right now for ukraine. and i think that's why certainly for ukraine and certainly for the leaders here, the urgency they had around the table was really to get that age. that's built off the the frozen russian assets. their profits from those assets get that as alone

in the hands of the ukrainian government by the end of this year, because there et, for that $50 billion would have been handed over to the ukrainians. and that's not something an incoming donald trump as president could then change. but everything else remains influx to a degree all right. >> nick, thank you so much. and we are awaiting remarks from president biden and ukrainian president volodymyr zelenskyy. it is getting into the 8:00 p.m. our there and for sono, italy, it's going to be sort of an evening event here if they don't get underway soon so we'll be keeping an eye on that and bringing that to you as soon as it gets started. >> we're also tracking major news stateside a significant development in the battle over reproductive rights. the supreme court unanimously rejecting a challenge to how the fda regulates mifepristone, the abortion pill this means the drug remains on the market and can still be mailed to patients without requiring them

to visit a doctor in person. >> this was a case that was brought by a group of doctors who are opposed to abortion. and in the court's opinion, justice brett kavanaugh wrote that citizens and doctors do not have standing to sue well, simply because others are allowed to engage in certain activities at least without the plaintiffs demonstrating how they would be injured by the government's alleged under-regulation of others we're joined now by cnn medical correspondent meg tirrell and cnn chief legal affairs correspondent, paula reid. paula first to you, this decision comes the same month, two years ago that the court took away a woman's constitutional right to an abortion by overturning roe versus wade our significant is today's decision in that context. >> well, it's fascinating because this has been one of the big cases that we've been watching for its potential impact, right? on women who need this drug on the fda. it's regulatory powers, something that at the supreme court had opted to weigh in

could have enormous implications for the entire pharmaceutical industry and other medical devices then also potentially impact on the 2024 race but they have effectively sidestep to this issue standing is a technical aspect of what you need to bring a case and they're saying that the people who brought this challenge did not have standing. they've not illustrated that they have an injury. if they have a complaint or a concern about and if a person stone justice kevin and the other justices suggested that they go color congress person to talk about legislative solutions or go through the executive branch. but this is not the way they can bring a case to the supreme court, but i fully expect that others who may have standing will try to challenge the same issue and then eventually the supreme court may opt to weigh in. but here they have preserve the status quo not shocking based on what we saw an oral arguments, but it's still possible that this issue could resurface at the supreme court in coming years. so now what we're watching for is their decision on another abortion

case that is out there pending because remember, in the wake of their decision to overturn roe v. wade, now there were all these challenges, testing the limits of that decision, the trying to determine the contours of what exactly it means to send this down to the states. and that other case has to do with a challenge out of idaho and what do you do when you have a restrictive state laws and more permissive federal laws. so now that case arguably takes on an even greater significance yeah, it certainly does and meg, what are the practical implications here of this decision for women who are seeking abortion care well, mifepristone is one of two drugs used for medication abortion, which is the most common way that people access abortion in the us, that accounted for almost two thirds of abortions in 22 23 according to the guttmacher institute, there were more than 1 million abortions in that year. >> so that's more than 600,000 people who were accessing this medication. now, telehealth was a key issue here at this in this case, it wasn't that the supreme court, if it had ruled the other way, was necessarily

going to take this drug completely off the market. but they were going to roll back how it could be used just including potentially making it so that you could not access it through telehealth. and 19% of abortions according to this data, which was as of the end of last year we're through telemedicine so that was a very important way that people access this drug. and it will continue to be so because nothing is going to change as a result of this ruling medication abortion is not legal in states where abortion is illegal, although people do access medication abortion through the mail and those states that same data. providers at about 40,000 people living in states with bands are restrictions, access to abortions from providers in states with shield laws for doctors and so people are still getting access to medication, abortion in this way, guys, this won't necessarily, well, this won't change anything, but we could see more challenges in the future mega, this case does have implications for the fda and the pharmaceutical industry more broadly, right? yeah, we

saw friends of the court briefs published by the pharmaceutical industry and groups representing them because they were concerned that if a court could come in and essentially overturn an fda decision on a drug, then that could open up the entire system, whatever drugs people wanted to challenge, they could do it through this means. and so the pharmaceutical industry was really worried this could upend the entire industry really, and the gold standard of the regulatory process so they end statements today is sort of breathing a sigh of relief here. they are plotting this decision. we know that the fda and health and human services department also applauding the decision. but we could see more challenges still both to mifepristone and if it comes up through the same path way to the fda and to the drug industry as well all right, meg tirrell, thank you for that. >> thank you to paul as well. and still ahead, reproductive rights are also an issue right now on the senate floor, senate democrats forcing a vote on a bill that would guarantee access to ivf nationwide. right now, it is though likely to

fail, will be joined by a democratic senator, tina smith with more what she hopes this accomplishes. >> the most anticipated moment of this election. and the stakes couldn't be higher. the president and the former president, one stage to vary different visions for america's future. the cnn presidential debate thursday, june 27th, nine live on cnn and streaming un-backed with cascade platinum plus, i have up my dish getting in that dishwasher, watching platinum plus gives you the highest standard of clean even in your machine. clean enough for you. >> yeah. >> it's great. >> bloat done cascade platinum plus recipes. recipes written by buyin, lost to time are now being analyzed and restored i'm using the power of delhi power e-trade award-winning trading app makes trading easier with it's customizable

options chain, easy to use tools and pay for trading to help sharpen your skills, you can stay on top of the market from wherever you are e-trade morgan stanley, power e trades easy to use tools may complex trading less complicated custom scans hope you find new trading opportunities while an earnings tool helps you plan your trades and stay on top of the market. e-trade from morgan stanley was that trouble losing weight and keeping her same discover the power of week-old to the fbi gobi. i lost 35 pounds as some lost the war, 46 pounds when he go. >> and i'm keeping the weight off, we go be helped you lose weight and keep it off. >> i'm reducing my risk. >> we go v is the only fda approved for weight management medicine that's proven to reduce risk of major cardiovascular events and adults with known heart disease and with either obesity or overweight, we go v should be

used for semaglutide or glp-1 medicines. don't take, we go via fewer. your family had medullary thyroid cancer multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome, type-2 or allergic to it, stopped. we go we and get medical help right away. if you get a lump or swelling in your neck severe stomach pain, or an allergic reaction, serious side effects may happen including pancreatitis and gallbladder problems. we go we may cause low blood sugar and people with diabetes, especially if you take medicines to treat diabetes, tell your provider about vision problems or changes, or if you've feel your heart racing while at rest depression or thoughts of suicide may occur. call your provider right away if you have any mental changes, common side effects like nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea may lead to dehydration, which may cause kidney problems. >> would we go i'm losing weight keeping it off and i'm lowering my cv risks check your cost and coverage before talking to your healthcare professional about we go itch, scratch must not stop the sanity with cortisone, ten for

bug bites, poison ivy, and other riches. >> cortisone ten is number one, doctor recommended. >> it works fast and lasts for hours the zone ten three, body serie a city client uses city's financial expertise to help drive its growth and keep its supply chain moving. some more pet parents can get everything they need right when they need it keeping more pets and families happy for the love of moving our clients forward, for the love of progress hi, i'm greg. >> i live in bloomington, illinois. i'm not an actor. i'm just a regular person. >> some people say, why should i take privilege and i don't have a problem with my memory. memory loss is not something that occurs overnight. i started noticing subtle lashes and memory. i want people to know that provision has worked for me itself. my memory

itself, my cognitive qualities give it a try. i wanted to help you to get his helped me prevalent at stores everywhere without a prescription this is yeah, that looks totally safe brief first timer hot. let's was sure. >> it looks safe, but like nearly half of all us cars, it's been in an accident with garfield x.com. you see how accidents impact price. see you don't have to overpay on pause until accident. >> was space. >> here you're going to need it twins oh, that was too long of a pause shop with the facts at the all new car facts.com. >> i've hanako montgomery and tokyo and this cnn on capitol hill senate democrats have forced voting on a bill that would guarantee nationwide access to ivf in vitro fertilization treatments to help people conceive. >> it would enshrine federal protections for patients to get the treatment and for doctors

to provide the treatment it would also block any state attempts to restrict access. today's vote comes just hours after the supreme court rejected a challenge to how the fda regulates the abortion pill mifepristone. their decision means the drug will stay on the market, at least for now. joining us now is democratic senator tina smith of minnesota, senator. thank you so much for being with us. critics have argued that this bill is a solution to a problem that doesn't exist. they point to alabama where ivf clinics were shut down for a period, but state laws were changed and they were able to start up again. i'm wondering what's your the response to those who say it's unnecessary well, i would say tell that to the women who have been investing their physical and emotional and financial energies in to conceiving a child through in vitro fertilization only defined, you live in a place like alabama were suddenly your doctor would be considered committing homicide or

manslaughter if the procedure went forward, right now in this country, there are something like 14 states where laws are pending that would essentially criminalize in vitro. >> so i say it is necessary and i also say that this is a very straightforward piece of legislation that we put forward at basically would say that you have the right to receive ivf to provide i, vf and to have your insurance cover the cost of ivf. and to me that is something that everybody should be able to support. and in fact, across the country, it would be broadly supported by americans it's also generally protecting ivf broadly supported across the senate. there were republican senators just yesterday, katie britt of alabama, ted cruz of texas, who tried to pass their own ivf protection act why not work with them to craft a bipartisan bill that would pass that theirs was blocked by democrats well, so it's interesting to take a look at the bill that they put forward because i think it tells you a lot of

where they're really coming from. >> there was nothing in there legislation that would have protected access to ivf. there was nothing in their legislation that would have stopped states from restricting ivf, in fact, the biggest thing that they're legislation would do was to say that if a state did take that step who knows how that would be defined, that they would then be denied medicaid. medicaid payments from the federal government. so they're all you're doing is punishing women when over 40% of the babies in this country are born, covered by medicaid insurance. so there was nothing in that bill that was real. in fact, i think their bill was the epitome of a messaging bill. they were trying to get well on this issue because because they know they're out of step with americans. and yet at the end of the de, they're not willing to come together with us. this is something that is important for americans to understand because i think the problem here that republicans don't have a messaging problem, they have a policy problem. and that was really laid bare today on the senate

what would it take for you to see from republicans to give you a sense that movement toward a bill protecting ivf nationally was actually going forward well, i'd like to see them come to come together to say that they are ready to pass legislation that would stop states from putting restrictions on the policies that end up clobbering in vitro fertilization a few of a state that is passing a law which says that life begins at conception. you are essentially taking a step that would criminalize in vitro fertilization. and so that's the gap that we have here in terms of what we really need to to do to protect families who are pursuing this. i mean, it's close to a miracle. the medicine and the science that is able to help infertile couples have a child senator, i also wanted to get your reaction to the supreme court decision earlier today, are rejecting that lawsuit.

>> that sought to challenge the fda's regulation of mifepristone. i imagine you welcome this decision well, i see this as a reprieve, not a vindication. i think that the court it would have been inconceivable that the court would have agreed that these doctors that came together anti-abortion doctors, that they had standing in this case, that they actually have been harmed in some way. so they did i think the only they think that they could do, but it's important to understand that they left the door wide open. in fact, they nearly invited the next challenge and we know that they're going to be challenges out there coming forward very quickly. that will continue the effort to say that we should not be able to male medication abortion through sin medication abortion through the mail, and let's be honest, we also know that the trump camp, which is responsible from all of this, has plans to use their executive authority showed who become president again, to ban mailing medication, abortion,

abortion generally. so this is a real challenge. this is why i'm working to pass the repeal of the comstock act. so we can the stop that from happening in the future. >> well to pick up off your point about the trump camp, we actually heard from former president trump in his meeting with house republicans are sources indicate that he walked a line on abortion he told his colleagues to be smart on how they campaign on the issue, but to not be afraid to paint democrats stance as extreme he argued for exceptions when the life of the mother is at risk for incest and rape how do you think republicans might move forward on painting democrats as extreme when it seems like president trump is trying to hedge the position more broadly well, i think you're absolutely right. >> he is trying to hedge his position because he realizes that his his policy position is broadly unpopular with the

american public. but i don't think american women are going to be kohn by this. they know that trump is the one who put these anti choice judges on the supreme court he is the one who is responsible for these trump abortion bans that are across all of the country, meaning one and three american women of childbearing age don't have the freedom to make their own decisions. and that's the reality. and i think that people are going to are very focused on that reality and not what he happens to say today or yesterday or tomorrow about how he's trying to moderate his physician. >> senator tina smith, we have to leave the conversation there. appreciate you joining us thank you. of course. >> just a few minutes from now, president biden will be alongside ukrainians president volodymyr zelenskyy, facing questions from reporters. they are at the gsp seven summit in italy, and we're going to bring you their remarks as soon as they start older, james is cold, calculating, cynical, and needs the money not only was

the cia compromise, he also was compromised secrets and spies, a nuclear game sunday at ten on cnn, what impacts hue? >> the three down in denial. there's one influential book that shapes the way we measure that create ignite change. the bibles in fact, is all around. you discover how at museum of the bible your skin is ever ever-changing. take care of it with gold ponds, age, renew formulation i've seven moisturizers and three vitamins. for all your skin's cold bond. >> we talk about cash back. kevin hart, not again talking about cashback. we talking about cash back here. >> i've are not talking about bragg we talked about cash back and we talk about cash. he talking about cash we've been talking about practice, but too long word, no practice. we talk about cashback, talking about cashback.

>> we not talking about a guy cashback like a pro with chase freedom unlimited. >> how do you cashback chace. >> make more of what your freedom unlimited? >> with armor all a little bit of this protects you from a lot of that armor all west work, more clean centrum, it scientifically formulated to help you take charge of your home. >> is that trump is everybody a healthy foundations supporting your yours. >> you did plus tries centrum silver. >> now clinically proven to support memory in older adults itch, scratch must not stop the sanity with cortisone, tan fur bug bites, poison ivy and other riches. cortisone ten is number one, doctor recommended. it works fast and lasts for hours. cortisone ten someone needs to customize and save hundreds of liberty mutual white.

>> there's an elevator only pay for what you need labor day if you're shopping for a home realtor.com, real choice financing let's do choose from up to three independent lenders. >> unlike some apps that push you to use their mortgage company, really, really trust the number one app, real estate professional let's trust what you doing. >> just probably a car on carbonic already got pre-qualified in two minutes i can customize my terms, say my car is getting delivered in a couple of days delivered when we finance and buying your car with carbonic today, right now, you get a free foot august up. >> weight just by entered foot login to app get one free. just scan the qr code and enter promo code fal pogo. it only worked. i'm not a satis scream buddy. >> you still got a landline or your house on a noun the subway out did you know taking xyz all at night, release allergies while you sleep you wake refreshed for more productive

day get 24 hour continuous relief that does not fade. >> he wise old, take xyz off at night deliveries happen order that this happens. sox that happens. we get out of there are at least two back at the pitch.,

healthier. with the aura ring i learned thoughts on capitol hill and this former president trump just spoke from capitol hill, not the capital nearby. >> write it has it's the first time that he's been there since the insurrection on january 6, back in 2021 he was visiting locations blocks away from the capital rallying house and senate republicans to his presumed nomination for president. >> let's cnn national correspondent kristen holmes is following the former president. he was just at the headquarters of the national republican senatorial committee. >> he didn't speak for very

long. >> kristen, but she got a warm reception, applause from these senators yeah, boris and breanna not only did not think for a long, but he also didn't take questions even though he was looking directly at us reporters shouting at him, but he clearly had a message you wanted to put out there which was that the party was unified behind him and just given the indication of what we saw with the senators on that warm welcome, the party is rallying behind the former president as the presumptive nominee. >> now, when all that talk about unity, we heard a very different tenor from donald trump, or at least according to our sources, earlier this morning when he met with house republicans, they described him as bouncing around from topic to topic at times, airing his grievances, talking about the justice system insulting some of the congressional republicans who had impeached him and saying that he was happy that many of those would impeach him, were no longer in office. >> this was a very different donald trump, and according to senators were talking to our

reporters up on the hill. >> they said, even in the meeting, it was a different tone that he was positive, that he was talking about unity. and i will remind you that republicans on both sides, senate and house, had hoped that this kind of message of unity would be something that donald trump could deliver. just a reminder here, donald trump himself is not somebody who get rid of grudges. but according to the senators, he was saying it was time to move on. now one thing that's notable, he did talk to mitch mcconnell. we just kinda had endorsed him, but the two still hadn't spoken since that election was certified for biden mcconnell, obviously had blamed him in part for that insurrection on january 6, one other notable part about that, despite the fact that they talked despite the fact that mcconnell said that it was positive, there was a whole slew of republican senators who stood behind donald trump when he spoke just now, mcconnell was not one of them. the question i would have asked i was trying to ask, how do you actually taken it? was what they talked about and if he would be willing to work with them, but unclear now from

donald trump side, what that would look like all right. >> christian, we know you had a question for him we're sorry that you didn't get to ask it or that he didn't answer it. >> i shouldn't say kristen holmes on the hill. thank you for that. >> president biden to speak alongside ukraine's leader volodymyr zelenskyy. >> any minute now we're going to bring you the president's remarks live once they begin wednesday, cnn celebrate juneteenth with special performances by john legend, hadi lewbel, smokey robinson. >> we still have a lot of work to do juneteenth, celebrating freedom and legacy wednesday at ten on cnn we'll quality that starts in our factory real performance in your backyard steel tools, or as tough than pender ball is the people who use them this bothers de, give them the gift that's built per dab right now, save $20 on the

ms 162 gas-powered chainsaw real still i'm getting vaccinated pfizer's pneumococcal pneumonia vaccine syllabi because i'm at risk for pneumococcal on ammonia i'm getting prevnar 20 because there's a chance pneumococcal pneumonia could put me in the hospital if you're 19 or older with certain chronic conditions like asthma, diabetes, copd, or heart disease, or are 65 or older, you are at increased risk for pneumococcal pneumonia, prevnar 20 is approved and adults to help prevent infections from when he strains of the bacteria that caused pneumococcal pneumonia in just one dose, don't get prevnar 20 if you've had a severe allergic reaction to the vaccine or it's ingredients, adults with weakened immune systems may have a lower response to the vaccine. the most common side effects were pain and swelling at the injection site, muscle pain, fatigue, headache, and joint pain. >> i want to be able to keep my plan just one dose can help

protect me from pneumococcal pneumonia. >> that's why i chose prevnar 20 ask your doctor or pharmacist about the pfizer vaccine for pneumococcal pneumonia i brought in a juror max protein with 30 grams of protein. >> those who tried me felt more energy and just two weeks here, i'll take that ensure max protein, 30 grams protein one prim sugar, 25 vitamins and minerals, and a new fiber with a prebiotic from medium rare two well many ways to save life. >> ruddy wallet, happy about 365 by whole foods market brynn new group does they seat assignments in my bag like a bunch of groceries, alice cheese and greens, just contemplate freedom. you can take your eyes off the new 2024 jeep wrangler in gladiator sheep, there's only one during

the jeep make this the summer event, get 2000 bonus cash allowance plus no monthly payments for 90 days on the 2024 gop-led eater and most 2024 jeep wrangler gasp howard models did you know taking xyz all at night release allergies while you sleep you wake refreshed for more productive day get 24 hour continuous relief that does not fade. >> he wise old, take xyz off at night with vasari, create factory grade visual solutions

to perfect your process that sides make your statement. >> men tell us when they use just for men to eliminate gray, there's a great before and after then. there's the after the after that boost you get when you look and feel your best. and that's why more menchu just for men your skin is ever ever-changing. >> take care of it with gold ponds each for a new formulations of seven moisturizers and three vitamins for all your skin's cold bond closed captioning brought to you by meso book.com if you or a loved one have mesothelial mac will send you a free book to answer questions you may have call now and we'll come to you 808 to one 14000 at any moment now we expect to see president biden and ukrainian

president volodymyr zelenskyy, shoulder to shoulder on the sidelines of the g7 summit in italy, the two liters are set to announce a ten years security agreement aimed at reaffirming american resolve to support kyiv and face in the face these are russia's invasion earlier, the group of seven liters agreed to lend tens of billions of dollars to ukraine. it's money backed by the profits from frozen russian assets. >> this is a win for president biden, who has been urging allies to seal this deal. >> and it's all fueling comparisons to post world war ii tensions between the united states and the soviet union. >> the cold war brought the threat of a nuclear attack to the forefront of citizens minds, not only in the us, but across the world. >> and during that time, world leaders work to mitigate the tensions on the global stage, while various spies were working in in the shadows with tension still high, the lessons learned from the cold war and the stories of these secret agents are still extremely relevant i think gorbachev had

a sense that he had an opportunity here to open this dialogue because he was of a different generation and it was gorbachev, a himself who began to change the dialogue well, i think this is an important letter and it's dated june 10, 1985 does the letter gorbachev wrote to reagan? >> that, is the soviet union that is surrounded by american military basis stuffed also by nuclear weapons rather than the us by soviet basis try to look at the situation to ris try to look at the situation through our eyes it's a powerful line because when you're negotiating with somebody, one of your main obligation is to see how they see the issue all

right joining us now to discuss, we have former secretary of defense and cia director leon panetta, always great to have you. i wonder how did the spine network during the cold war pave the way for modern day agents well, i think it's fair to say that what happened during the cold war and frankly, what's happening today? >> is that there is no question that both countries have engaged in probably one of the most dangerous and risky and consequential spy games in history. in the cold war, we had the rosenbergs, we had ames, who was another spike plus phi who worked for the cia, high levels five for the russian robert hansen, who was an fbi agent, who was a spy for the russians, the united states

we had a high level spike named olig pancoast ski, who gave us a very important missile information and the cuban missile crisis. we also had gary powers shot down a youtube flight over russia and that, that continues today. when i was director of the cia, the russians tried to place tenth spice in the united states in an effort to try to move them into sensitive positions. we were able from our own sources to be able to stop it. but it is continuing today. >> i want to ask you about as you see continuing today, i want to ask you about what we're seeing today. russian ships and submarines armed with hypersonic missiles, not nuclear weapons. they say they left those at home. that's what they say. >> you know, whenever you see something like that in port in cuba i think people they, they

sort of see shades of the cuban missile crisis. >> and i wonder if you do or if you think that comparison is not apt. >> i think i think we have to be very vigilant putin is going to try to punch a spat because he's taking a hit with the weapons that were providing to ukraine the flexibility we're giving the ukrainians to be able to to go after targets in russia and he's angry at that. so he's going to try to punch back and i think his sending those vessels into cuba is kind of a signal that that he is not pleased with what the united states is doing and he's going to try to get back as a bad as i think we have to be cool here. we have to look at the situation we have to make sure that nothing on those vessels

involves anything that could be a threat to our national security and we are watching right now, we're expecting the president to begin his comments shoulder to shoulder with ukrainian president zelenskyy here at any moment, i wonder how you see this moment in the war with ukraine in the us's fight against russia, even if it doesn't have boots on the ground. >> how do you see this moment especially with the uncertainty of the election in november hanging over all of this i think it's a very important moment for the united states and our allies are g7 allies are nato allies. to be able to make very clear that the united states and our allies are going to continue to provide the necessary weapons to ukraine so that they can be successful in stopping the russians. a

10-year commitment here is very important in terms of the weapons systems that can be provided to you. crank does the fact that you know the election could impact on things is that is that a threat here? of course it is a threat but the issue then becomes whether a new president is going to be serious about protecting our national security when it comes to dealing with the russians that's a test that will face whoever is elected president in the united states. >> let's say it is trump. and this ten year security deal coming out of today is something he reneges on. what would that mean? >> well, you know, he was on the hill today. i talking to the majority leader mitch

mcconnell and talking to other republicans. they're there are majority of republicans, senators who's strongly support our assistance to ukraine they're the ones that are going to have to step up and make sure that trump stands by our commitment. to bet to provide the weapons necessary in order for ukraine to defend itself so yeah, it it's going to be shaky trump can be very chaotic and the way he deals with national security but like all presidents, he's got to know that that his basic support in the congress, both in the house and the senate is one that supports providing military aid to the ukrainians. and stopping potent from his aggression in ukraine. >> when you think of what is at stake here in the months ahead

and how this is approached whoever is an actually pardon me secretary. and director. let's listen in as president zelenskyy. and president biden i'm are going to be walking up to this signing area where they are going united states and ukraine there'll be signing the security agreement. we just heard them make that announcement. there on the stage here on the sidelines of the g7 summit. this is an agreement that follows months of negotiations between the us and ukraine and is expected to commit the the us for ten years. to continued training of ukrainian armed forces, two more cooperation in the production and weapons and military equipment, which is happening all over the us. and many, many states and to the

continued provision of military assistance and greater intelligence sharing. let's listen in. >> the dado seven lithuania united states brought together, i remember the g7 to sign a joint declaration support for ukraine 25 additional countries joined us quickly each agreed to forge a long-term bilateral commitments with ukraine president's zelenskyy. and i have just now signed that agreement between the united states and ukraine our goal is this trend of ukraine's credible defense and deterrence capabilities for the long term a lasting peace for ukraine must be underwritten by ukraine's own ability to defend itself. now and to deter future aggression anytime in the future. united states is going to help ensure that ukraine can do both not by sending american troops to fight in ukraine, but by providing weapons and ammunition expanding

intelligence-sharing continuing to train brave ukrainian troops at bases in europe and the united states, enhancing interoperability between our militaries in line with nato standards investing in ukraine's defense industrial base so in time in time, they can supply their own weapons, ammunitions, working with ukraine's partners to build a future for us that is strong, sustainable, and resilient and supporting ukraine's economic recovery as well as his energy recovery. after russia has repeatedly targeted ukraine's energy grid with massive attacks in the futile attempt to break the will of the ukrainian people all these lines of efforts and others are laid out in this agreement additionally, the g7 achieved a significant outcome this week on the matter of russia's frozen assets in europe and other places outside of outside of russia back in 20222 days

after russia's invasion, members of the g7, the european union work together to freeze 280 billion in russian central bank funds outside of russia. i'm very pleased to share that this week. this week, the g7 signed a plan to finalize and unlock $50 billion on the proceeds of those frozen assets put that money to work for ukraine and other reminder to putin were not backing down. in fact, we're standing together against this illegal aggression. the agreement, the president lins, can i just signed also lays out our shared vision for a just peace a piece rooted in the un charter and the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity. >> a piece with a broad based support around the world that holds russia accountable for the damage that is done in this war we will see this vision strongly affirmed at historic peace conference happened in switzerland this weekend. >> or vice president harris will represent the united

states. finally, this agreement accelerates ukraine's integration into the european atlantic transatlantic communities. it includes major commitments from ukraine to impact and excuse me, diplomat, democratic economic and security reform in line with the europeans unions at session goals. and nieto's programs of reform. while we take this step, united states is also intensifying pressure on russia yesterday us treasury department made clear any bank anywhere in the world that deals or sanctioned, russian banks, companies, or individuals risk being sanctioned themselves and we announced roughly 300 new sanctions on individuals and companies that are helping russia with war. thank clue. key parts of russia's finances so second wait till it goes over as well as individual and

entities. a supplying russia with items critical to its defense production. like microeconomic like micro microelectronics machine tools, and industrial materials. we also, we also sanctioned more russian future energy projects that russia's natural gas oil projects that are under construction are not yet fully operating putin is counting on revenues from these projects are sanctions was threw up those plans. plus at the g7 we discussed are shared concern about countries like china or resource supplying russia and materials they need for their war machine and we agree, it taking collective action to push back against that activity. let me close this. you've taken three major steps at the d7 that collectively show puede. we cannot be, cannot wait us out he cannot divide us. and we'll be with ukraine until they prevail in this war first is a bilateral security agreement just signed.

second historic agreement provide $50 billion in value from russian sovereign assets to ukraine. and third, an agreement to ensure our sanctions efforts disrupt third, countries that are supplying russia's war effort that will increase pressure on the russian economy. collectively, this is a powerful set of actions and we'll create a stronger foundation for ukraine success two-and-a-half years ago, putting on least a brutal war in ukraine and it's been a horrifying a deal for the cranium. people are so brave, incredible it also been a test for the world. would we stand with ukraine? where do we, stand for sovereignty, freedom, and against tyranny? united states, the g7 countries around the world. i've consistently answered the question by say yes, we will we will say it again. yes, again and again and again. we're going to stand with ukraine and thank you. and i now yield to my friend from ukraine, president thanks so much mr. >> breadth and biden, your president. dr. john, on less de

are ukrainians. de are americans and thank you so much. thank see tilly and georgia to foreign invitation de a france today, is it through limb historic day? and we have signed the strongest agreement within ukraine and us since our independence and this is an agreement on security and thus on the protection of human life this is an agreement on cooperation and dhss on how our nations will become stronger. this is an agreement on steps to guarantee sustainable peace and therefore, it benefits everyone in the world because the russian war against ukraine, either real, real global threat i thank you very much, mr. president, for your

leadership which is reflected. in particular in disagreement. and in your years of support for ukraine, i think our teams, both seems thanks very much for making sure that the details of the agreement are really good. and of course, i want to thank every, every ukrainian soldier all our people whose courage made this level of airlines between ukraine and the united states possible? and i'm proud of our people and what ukraine can do. and i'm wearing grateful to all americans, to everyone in american cools strengthens american leadership so under the points of the agreement, shores, the agreement contains he wearing detailed legally binding part, and this means that credibility

of american support for our ukrainian independence. secondly, security commitments from the united states are based among other things, on their sustainability of security and defense support. not only for them, duration of this war, but also also for the period of peace after the war. and we will definitely ensure peace. sort. it clearly states that america is worth your grants, efforts to win this war. force. the agreement has good provisions on weapons for our defense whereas specifically on there petrol systems were specifically glare on the supply of fighter squadrons to ukraine. that's right plural squadrons including, but not limited to have 16s. >> we have worked for a long time for these. the agreement is also very specific about the

supply of the necessary weapons. join production, and strengthening of the defense industries of our countries through our for cooperation and this is something that will not only provide security, but also new good jobs for ukrainians and americans. the agreement also outlines what is needed in terms of intelligence, information the agreement contains key aspects of protecting the lives of our people fifths, it is very important that the agreement also addresses the issue of russia's just responsibility for this war at its attempt to destroy ukrainians america supports both three or compensation for the damage caused by russian strikes and working out ways to ensure that frozen russian assets are used to protect and rebuild ukraine.

the agreement also includes sanctions and export controls that will make rosin fail the paying for what it is doing. again, the freedom of people's and two more things. i'm grateful that philosophy of our security agreement is in fact that philosophy of the airlines. and that is why the issue of nadir is covered through the text of the agreement. it states that america supports ukraine's future future members have been adr and recognizes that our security agreement is a bridge to ukraine's member membership in eto it is where important for all ukrainians and for all europeans to know that there will be no security deficit in europe, which tempts the aggressor to war and makes the

future uncertain. now, we are clearly defining ever sing. we will cooperate cooperate for the sake of victory, make peace guarantees effective, and provide the necessary security for our people. and thank you. mr. president, for your leadership in the g7 decision on 50 billion loan for ukraine, it's vital step forward in providing sustainable support for ukraine in winning this war. russian a mumble is assets should be used for defending lives of ukrainians from russian tear and for ripping the damage, aggressor cause to ukraine. it's fear an absolutely right. mr. president. thank you. your team. i would also like to thank the united states congress for their support. both parties, both chambers. thank you and thanks to er