Skip to main content

tv   Arts Unveiled  Deutsche Welle  January 14, 2024 8:30am-9:01am CET

8:30 am
as we say, there is never giving up every weekend on d. w. the artificial intelligence as taking the creative world by storm making things possible that artists could previously only dream of and must seem stolen them and it machines are smarter than humans. the machine has the power. do we want to give the machines the power to control us? i don't think so. once it was the soul algorithms to be doing the work, a creative artist become redundant. yeah, i think a are is replacing are these parts. i don't think it's necessarily bad where some see a great opportunity other seeing if to danger
8:31 am
a i can be good. it can be but like every technology withdrawal and you can q and you kind of amazed and it's, it's our choice. what we do, the at the 2022 vin espn ali ada caused quite a stir. she's the 1st humanoid robots and make her own art. with the help with artificial intelligence, the her inventor, british gallery director aden miller developed her with a team of computer scientists. robotics experts and designers. ada perceive the environment through cameras and her eyes. algorithms process the information and provide impulses for drawing. the robots and single handedly determines or creative output without any human intervention. this love of us mention
8:32 am
a little boy. i think. what fundamentally interesting is people about robotics and artificial intelligence is that it's like a replica of themselves. it has something akin to a divine function. so i'm creating intelligence that i'm creating, another human being. and i think that triggers the age old human log into play. god means of should we fear robots or welcome them? hello robot is the name of the exhibition at the vitro designed museum and the german town of bi alarm rhine. it focuses on our destination with robots and artificial intelligence. a i for short, and the tense relationship between man and machine austria, anomaly client, you rated the show which has successfully towards the world. take a look at this me and if ops, the technology is coded. everything in our world, like a thin layer of color. that's just a fact of turnville and there's no turning back now that the genie is out of the
8:33 am
bottle. and that's why we have to keep asking ourselves as individuals and as a society how we want to implement this technology. the industrialized world can no longer function without its intelligent machines, but the outlook for the co existence of humans and robots swings between new topics and just stop ex, between hopes for a better mechanized world and fears that human agency will get lost. yeah, man and the stain describe a robot who writes manifesto it was and excitedly, that's intellectual work, as we know from politics or aren't. but that robot is as dumb as a door knob come. didn't notice the vocabulary, grammar, and syntax, and it has no clue about what it's writing. hardly any other phenomenon has captured the imagination of the movie industry as much as the vision of artificial beings then not only have an uncanny human appearance, but also far superior abilities from the trouble is to 2001,
8:34 am
and believed runner to matrix science fiction films, including many blockbusters, have explored humanities, an easy fascination with robot. android, and artificial intelligence. 16 if you get bash be left to can speaking there's so many examples of artificial intel consist that of found their way into our brains and hearts through pop, culture shaping are image of robots and a i can see the things. that's why we're always disappointed when we come across a real a i or robots because are usually nowhere near as cool as the ones we know from movies and books. but where do the boundaries between a and human creativity, like will machines managed to crack one of the last mysteries and are increasingly technologies the world. how we feel emotions and turn them into art. mateo crees, director of the beach with design museum, is doubtful. gosh,
8:35 am
you know kind of what so, and then some machine cannot feel emotional. so that between 5th and no matter how much people insist that will eventually be able to produce cynthia and machines, they won't have the emotions of a human being. and those emotions are reflected in any good work of art, whether it's a painting, a design object or a great building, the toner, it's an irreplaceable factor. it's in fact i didn't to convince your that's the but what can and can't machines learn? part is leon live in child offer some insight. he started painting as a child and by the age of 16 was celebrated by the art world as a prodigy and sensation earning the nickname baby because so he's one of the most successful german painters under 30 and famously willing to turn new ground in the quin finished one plus plus one investment. oh, i find it incredibly exciting to combine these 2 components. one says that is
8:36 am
pairing art with artificial intelligence when in order to bring the art to another level and break new grounding, making it even more innovative. he gets to be in queens know in about 2 months and of course also to keep up with the times that type 2 gifts they on live in trout is taking part in a study that investigating the question, what do artists feel when they paint? what goes on in their brain during the creative process. for this purpose, the master class of the virtual design program, that kinds of louts on university of applied sciences measures his brain, waves. narrow feedback shows that when he painting, he enters the kind of trans then it would be no cost to him. so i know we captured data from his movements and brain waves and the brush strokes he made the sounds of we recorded sounds and basically everything that could be turned into a numbers. and then we used algorithms to create data from all of that to visualize
8:37 am
the image is what is an immersive spatial installation has been designed using the collected data. the artist is creative process can be experienced by means of an interactive surface. this gives the public a happ dickson station of how it feels. nothing indeed, gets even put the thought that goes into the creative process. the abstract expression and energy i always have approaching my painting is something that many people underestimate. the other thing that i can be dealt with the physical toll it takes on the body, but also on the brain of all it's really a massive effort, mentally, as well. doing this intensive creative work for hours on end. does such a bus? does the engine cease so all but in the future, the artist could possibly save himself all the efforts because artificial intelligence will make it possible to generate algorithms of liam live in trouts
8:38 am
creative process and visual language. using data obtained from the study and produced images in his style, the beginning of the on. and you seem to see that there are parts of the brain that map certain creative work and processes viewing all. so theoretically you could have leon's, dreams interpreted and generate an image of them the next morning you'd bust, yeah, you're not good wanted. but leon moving charles creative process is still that of a typical artist. he draws sketches and applied acrylic paint to the canvas without high tech, but with dedication and passion. but could a, i create something similar, or even better. the moments are good, it's the whole night. that's right now, i would say no, not yet. but i'm careful about predictions as to what might happen in coming years . because hey, i is absolutely powering ahead and direct and this whole topic will be surprising us a lot more than what we are made
8:39 am
by 8. i look like a brand new rembrandt sped out by a computer in 2016, a new painting by the dutch master was unveiled created with instead, with data from 346 of his works, a team of programmers, designers, and scientists from the delta university of technology and a i, experts from microsoft, developed countless algorithms to calculate proportions colors, gene light and shadow and substance with u v inc from a 3 d printer like oil on canvas. 148000000 pixels amounted to a portrait of a man between 30 and 40 years old, with a beard, had, and color and amazing result. but it's a really art dodge artist, veronica, go dine, uses
8:40 am
a i to explore relationships between human nature and technology. i believe that art is a reflection on society and post this question and i think a, i can also ask questions, but are they still meaningful? i think artists will reflect probably on a i, and that's will be a to me true art. the sad thing about artificial intelligence is that it lacks artifice, and therefore intelligence much has changed since john go to the ad made this statement. in 2018, the painting edmond did allow me became the 1st a i generated ard work on the market painted by an algorithm, stead. with 15000 portraits from various periods. it was the 1st a artwork to be solved by christie's. it earned some $433000.00 for the french art collective obvious, which provided the invented, developed new family trees,
8:41 am
gold frames, and the algorithmic formula in lieu of an artist signature. but when the machine is trained on millions of images and sophisticated algorithms create works of art, who deserves the credit ai, the programmer for the arts and artist that provided the data like picasso, rembrandt, or van go, hey, i arteries as many questions not just ethical and legal ones for vincent bridge, who teaches at the berlin university of the arts. it's the midst of the artist that matters. did call for. but despite this is front desk, yet, if i buy a painting knowing it's by bowski out, i'm more willing to spend a lot of money and look at it for hours. imagining him painting it in new york. the then if i see exactly the same picture knowing it was only created by a computer algorithm, but these new i don't just look at the po, result in a,
8:42 am
but i buy the story and the person a little bit closer to you cuz she's to, depends on this in mid call. but what exactly does an algorithm create? what can i do? a, i used the machines ability to imitate logical thought and creativity. once you need to humans, robots and machines are the hardware. while a, i is the software standing in for the brain, machine learning allows a i to continually develop, improve, and deliver results on its own. almost in real time. humans 1st the, the, a large amounts of data in the form of algorithms. rules that tell a computer what to do. the technology brings an unprecedented level of speed, precision and efficiency. but what about created very slow, but i couldn't switch it until again. i don't believe that artificial intelligence
8:43 am
will replace the emotions of art and creativity any time soon. because the next steps would be teeth open for so you can include this pure creativity comes partly from encounters with different cultures and people and journey school. and you mentioned using for the include and the artist brings all these emotions to the canvas. so i don't think i will ever completely replace the human artist couldn't stop it, did some good like a child, a eyes. first artistic endeavors were doodle. british artist, a computer scientist, harold, co in 1st developed in a i controlled drawing machine in the early 19 seventies era and imitates human hand movements with a robot and paints its own pictures. the 1st simple shape between black and white. since the 19 ninety's more complex and in color over 40 years until his death in 2016 harold cohen developed his art and technology raising the question. or if what aaron is making is not art,
8:44 am
what is it exactly the type, splendid thing that can come in and even if we can create pictures that are super photo, realistic, or look like van gogh or other works that look completely original and groundbreaking. ultimately, we're also discussing the question of what's real and what isn't all. and if i get boxes, how can we create our own work? i'm gonna look to, if he's an office so how can i be used as a creative tools recently has been advancing rapidly in the field of image processing and generation freely available text pictures, systems like dog, e and mid journey have caused a collective earthquake. it has never been easier, faster or cheaper to create digital images.
8:45 am
at the berlin university of the arts, vincent brits discusses the latest developments with the students and the artificial creativity seminar has come on. the seems like you can compare it a bit to when there was only classical painting. and then suddenly the 1st photographers appeared, took off and got, and there was certainly resistance. and people said it was an art, it was a photo plagiarism, whatever, not. and, and then over the years and decades, the idea of a photo artist to became established in con, i think it will be the same with artificial intelligence in fine. artificial intelligence can colorize historical film footage and seconds. but the programs show their limits when it comes to processing complex artwork. the problem with this, i think, is that, for example, if it's like an artistic video and the grass was pink because you painted the thing because it wasn't argued, we would make it green because it's basically just working on an advert slides.
8:46 am
complex image processing, like shading and lighting, is no problem for the latest generation of a i base graphics programs. what used to take hours or days can now be done in seconds. this is such a dispute to list us. it's threatening, of course that more and more people can generate an infinite number of images and the images i spend a lot of time creating no longer have the same value. like what are the same time? they're just tools to master and use wisely and embedded in larger concepts. i'm bit programs like dully or mid journey or disrupting the traditional creative process. the tools are impressively user friendly enter text into the program. and a guy speaks out the command as an image. creativity has no limits, even if the artist a quality is sometimes doubtful. the 2nd step is to keep a, as an artist, i find it more liberating and empowering to have new ways and tools to generate new
8:47 am
imagery and new things. and i still see it more as an opportunity and as it does this mean, it sounds like i know this one is funding victim that it's exciting that a designer no longer has to think about how to draw a picture. instead you think about how to best describe it so the computer can draw it. it's more or less the same job. it's not a completely different approach. money to the job. i'm going to guns and i'm going to buy the photos of people who don't even exist. every single pixel created by a guy and disassembled for millions of photos of real people from the web of the vintage of somebody's butte. from time facebook. imagine i download all the pictures from your facebook profile and load them into artificial intelligence and tell it to create your picture. i'm lucky unit does no more than look at these pictures and generate an image of you that's of i kind of doesn't process an existing image in indigenous and under each pixel is based on the photos of you, but is its own creation. and then it becomes difficult to discuss privacy rights,
8:48 am
the visas, because we just had the students have concerns about data protection, copyright and ethical issues. and of course, they worry about a threatening their own careers. i cannot compete with these kind of intelligence. it would always be flawless, it would be always faster. on the other hand, they're our personality and our humanity and our interest protectionist is actually what makes us sometimes better from this kind of a differential intelligence. the what is a, i can develop its own creativity. how does it influence us? who's controlling who these were among the questions addressed to the 2022 production address stance opera house. the simple opa,
8:49 am
tracing waterfalls is the 1st all pro with a libretto and score co written by artificial intelligence. and featuring a virtual voice, and impressive showcase for the technology. but humans, we're still in charge. right now we use mainly algorithms with a lot of different data inputs, but we still have some sort of control. and i find that really hard to think of a situation where the control is gone. but then also for me to meaning is going to pulling a i can be useful in a museum, for example, at the bell house archive in berlin. the company art plus comm, used a i to make the comprehensive collection visually accessible. usually and visitors can use a touch pad to navigate their way through 15000 images, fully immersing themselves in the archive. the berlin de studio on formative makes 3 d models with a i, the process of what it calls
8:50 am
a skilled thing it's can sold by humans, but not the result. the project demonstrates that artificial intelligence arguments its learning quickly, improves continually and delivers unforeseen sculptures of a quality that surprises, even the creators themselves. once the computer is got control, we might never get it back. if we're lucky, they might decide to keep us as pets. entire galaxies of artificial intelligence float above the compound of the us base agency, nasa, an artwork developed by lanika gord, dine and ralph. now the of studio drift with the help of artificial intelligence. hundreds of drones swimming patterns in the heavens. reflecting the natural intelligence of a flock of birds flying and memorization studio drift award winning work has been inspired all over the world.
8:51 am
the studio drift is based in amsterdam. the 2 artists work at the interface between technology and nature. together with the 70 member team. delicate, complex sculptures of light are created out of dandelions that have been fitted with l. e d studio drift. creat start that shows high tech can be beautiful and poetic if you think about the classical artist, you know, making imagery or it was yeah. working in a way that reflects to boss styles the i think a are is replacing artist, but i don't think is necessarily a bad thing. you know, because artist, in my opinion, good artist sugars to create a new version of the future. the studio drift also provided airborne arch for the 50 anniversary of the eggs didn't have money in 2022. more than $300.00 drones rose
8:52 am
into the night sky and sparkled above hamburg. the concept of delight installation was inspired by the location and architecture of the iconic concert hall. unfortunately, some of the breaking wave stars literally made a splash, whether due to external influences or technical problems. during the rehearsal 15 drones fell into the water at the premier 5 more filter earth. further performances of the light show were cancelled for safety reasons. everyone involved was disappointed. everything that is digital can develop a really fast because you can feel without real consequences because you can make the failures in a safe environment. but it's actually creating a, you know, an influx of a i, in the real world that is way harder and we have physical artist no doubt, and our process on ways slower. because we only make physic work and that has to be
8:53 am
safe. it has to be maintained and have to work for very long periods of time. studio drift is now working on a commission from google. quantum a i. the aim is to visualize how a quantum computer works. a process is millions of times faster than a conventional p c. the reason for the speed is that it carries out calculation steps simultaneously rather than in a sequence. a bit like a tree with many processes like growth and photo synthesis, taking place at the same time on the age limit less. there's no limit that's, that's the scary parts like we, we can't comprehend what it can become. you know, like there's no control 0. it is a form of evolution, it's just like a next life for him that, that we, we can't imagine what it is like a monkey kind of kind of imagine our skill sets and what we can become like same for us with a i google quantum, a i is based in santa barbara, california,
8:54 am
highly sensitive quantum computers are developed here and this high security compound, the mega computers and norm is processing capabilities and speed will play a major role in the field of artificial intelligence in the future. they can already solve problems that would take a normal pcs about a 150000 years to solve the. it's kind of like cheating in a way, as you know, by processes of humans and the evolution of nature goes over millions of years. and basically, just like skipping a couple of millions of years, artificial intelligence is a technology with unforeseeable potential. will it take us forward or an i latest? and what role will it play in art? will it remain a tool of created or will it replace them? at some point, will it not matter who or what creates a work of art, human or machine like in a year to be surprised or some,
8:55 am
a i creating an art piece that you know is just so out there that we like. this is a whole new art style. um uh yeah. but also next to that like, is that the right question to ask like a who cares about arts? if we will click on existing move old anymore, because a ours getting us to ensure a, it doesn't spin out of control. there need to be some guard rails, not just an art, but in politics to this was mention of it we need to retain the work of humans is of course a robot might even be able to do better. but to i want that on the no, i don't even if we humans are still slot and i still want to negotiate with another human, to hammer out laws and a framework within which we can work with technology and meditation. so will a, i lead us that our own game? will it make artist redundant? only time will tell,
8:56 am
perhaps sooner rather than later the
8:57 am
provide as a more official light sources on 10 nights in today to get the increase in brightness is messing with nature's inherent cannot quite with dramatic impacts on biodiversity. the can we come in 15 minutes on the w, the 7200 gallons of stars from across the
8:58 am
consummate good, better best group. and i got we know, and last but not least, i get it to i do indeed the use of it. so i'm assuming you guys the 77 percent in 90 minutes on the w, the discovery stories change your mind just to click away, find out best argument trees on you to see the world, the
8:59 am
subscribe. know to dw talking entry. so you don't think you the same way you expect and more different things from life than your parents. i just want to pursue what that's my thoughts hired or you think your kid is 2 different, risky, irresponsible, reasonable stuff in puerto, the sciences. i was under the doctor, still in the clubs. it's time to to proceed. vehicle your generation with a sleep us. i'm them. when generation as class this week on the dw, this kind of fun, it feels like therapy, the
9:00 am
. this is dw news line from berlin, counting the cost of a 100 days of war. as the israel home us complet continues. we report from a refugee camp in southern garza where displays, people are coping in desperate condition. and taiwan is president elect vows to defend the island against the threats from china in his election victory speech lights, and says he'll safe guard taiwan against what he called intimidation from beijing. we have the latest from our corresponded in tie pack, the
9:01 am
.

30 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on