every day, nice so many we all because like, instead of doing the i imagine you have to write a law or a basis that's a lot of work. but then you wonder, kind of a, i do it better than icon both on the show. why is one of the world's biggest future best hunting to x? formerly twitter post as the videos does even last, want to make x when you take talk. and it's a disturbing phenomenon. but a i generated nude picks us searching online, and kids are using them to believe each other, even though it is illegal. these are the topics that i'm moving the tech love with you soon have to turn to x to watch your favorite creative and generate one of the well, the biggest need to but who missed the beast,

dropped the video and x for the 1st time. instead of inches, this is happening as some big creative, leaving platforms like youtube. so can you learn less, leo, them to ex, all set and sweat the tank very enough time. so turn it into an everything up with a focus on videos. to do that, he needs creators to actually post videos to his platforms. until recently mr. based wasn't too sure about that idea. he said his video is cost more to make some what he's on the platform, but he'd be willing to test it once the monetization is cranking. and apparently it's cranking. now, his 1st video and ex pulled in over a 160000000 views, bring in roughly 230000 yards. however, not everyone is convinced that this happened organically. some skeptics think must pull some strings behind the scenes, pushing the video into everyone's feet, even less the based himself that advertises bought more ads to the video than they

might have done otherwise, suspecting the video was going to be big. however, bringing popular content creators to ex is still a better attempt to make it a video platform than what most tried so far. last year he allowed use us to pose to our videos, leading to pirates and movies popping up full of x for well, what do i need to do to create the perfect video platform? let's check out what the competition is doing right. and what they struggle with use of love, short snappy verticals such as a tech talk is the app to turn to when searching for news tutorials, products with news or recipes. the rise of textbook, other platforms have tried to copy it. success that gave us instagram reels and youtube shows both worked. at the end of 2023, maybe 75 percent of the most watch youtube channels are mostly producing youtube show out on instagram reels, received a lot of use each day spend regular photo puts,

so vertical seems to be the way to go fax. but creative, i'm making little money, but the, the problem was short videos is that they don't make much money. the reason for that is simple. the longer the video, the more ads platforms kind of crowd into it. that's why well, all the other platforms pushing the short formats take doc is actually encouraging . creates as to post along the videos. now up to 10 minutes, for comparison crate is in between $1.06 for a 1000 views on a tick tock or youtube show, but they can make between one and 29 year rose for a 1000 use on the long youtube video. this is according to create as who shared their revenue. you could argue that x should still just focus on verticals because that's what the views up, but to keep in mind can create as well and usually leads to more high quality content for us to enjoy. okay, hold up, so x should be focusing on long videos of to, oh, oh, is that another format that's possible? x,

breaking into streaming live streams boom. during the tons of it and youtube instagram and take talk all adapted to this trend by improving the live services. musk seems to have noticed that as well. and recently hosted the 1st live stream on that of himself playing video games. it could be a strategic time to recruit stream as to most of the a series of controversial decisions by the top, assuming telephone switch stream is looking for new options. some of the biggest twit stream is, have reportedly been offered, unaccepted millions of years. but other platforms stream exclusively on that, and it says one thing that must doesn't, black is much just the warning we will talk about a i generated fake news. images of mine is some of you may find this to study a i generate to child abuse images off searching online sometime ago teenagers in the u. k. and it's been used a i to create explicit pictures of them, his most likely to believe them. how is it possible to generate defects like that

in the 1st place? and what can you do to protect your child for yourself? exploitative defects. first, it was celebrities who became victims of pulling defects. but with the technology being widely available on becoming easier to use, the problem is spreading. studies have shown the 90 percent of victims of women. that's a side sophistic, but kind of predictable. so what happened exactly, and those british and spanish schools, well, you can, schools have reported that students are using a i didn't vic tech to believe that pits and dozens of spanish, teenagers said they received a i generated naked images of themselves on their mobile phones. the pictures were created using photos showing the targeted kids for the closed. many of the picks was sourced from the girls social media accounts. and i program then generated a virtual image of the person without clothes on police identified at least 11 local boys who either created a set can a to the image is by once up until the ground incidents like these are not limited

to spain or the u. k, that can happen anywhere in the world to adults and kids like that's disturbing on so many levels. it's a crime. the kids from spain in the u. k. might not have been aware of this, but creating i'm publishing explicit images of other minors is a crime in the countries whether they're using a i or not legally speaking, with talking about child sexual abuse materials making, possessing, distributing such material is illegal in many countries. the fact that the images aren't real doesn't necessarily change the fact that it's a punishable offense. for example, in another case in south korea and use audit visual intelligence to generate more than $300.00 exploitative images of children. in september 2023, it was sentenced to 2 and a hockey is in jail. even the cartoons or other less realistic depictions are illegal in many countries. it's easy to do. it's a lot to all of a few clicks to create very convincing photo realistic content. the spanish

teenagers use an application which promises to undress any go using i. it emphasizes that as guidelines include age verification and obtaining consent, but it doesn't stick to that. it's a fast growing problem. such material threatened to overwhelm the internet, that's according to u. k. based nonprofit internet. what foundation? 3 reasons why this is a huge problem. especially i generated images of child sexual abuse, could normalize the base of real children. secondly, it could make police recada as law enforcement offices could find it more difficult to identify whether real children are risk. and thirdly, i generated images of child abuse, could hyphen the risk for children in real life by encouraging peter files of facilitating grieving. what can you do to protect your child on yourself? bad news 1st. as the spanish case proves any photo can be used to generate deep fake, pornographic images, b o, y,

and inform your child that this kind of technology does exist. prepare yourself and your child to be faced with that kind of material. and in case that happens and form the police, the person sharing such images is carpeting a crime and many places in the world. no matter if the material is generated or real. i think we also need more regulation on generative ai companies that of a image generate as should have said, god's in place to make it impossible to create virtual needs of someone without the consent. in october 2023 law or written by chat gpc went into effect in brazil without changes. it's not a good thing. and a university in prague and the czech republic has deemed writing about slip basis points us. that's because they con, tell a students are using a i to write it. what does it mean if i can write as well or better than us? brazil, a, i writes low tax pads should not be charged to replace stolen war to meet those. that's the basic just of a new law put into place and the resilience

a d a pull to like, right? so far, nothing special. but get this. the draft that became law was 100 percent. a i generated a council mine has it in without informing his colleagues that the proposal was written by chat g p t. it was put into effect without any changes. portal or libraries. matt only found out about the lows, real origin by social media. when the council mon bragged about his achievement and the already of the examples from around the globe by lawmakers use the i in massachusetts usa, a democratic senate to attend to chat gt to help guide the bill aimed at regulating i including chat gpc, could i write battles, a little x, but at least seats attentional chat. zip is a maple 10, then even more of a mental shift. then the advent of the into that states, the renowned harvard law school in the us. but have it also warns of as potential shortcomings. g p t may not fully comprehend the nuances of the law. this could get

dangerous and situations that required in that legal analysis. but it's popular one year after it's released chat, gpc had more than a $118000000.00 monthly apps and uses. and as one of the fastest growing consume apps in history, it looks like it's a visual intelligence has already changed the way many of us, right? not just in regard to legal text, but also academia a i writing a bunch of pieces. you google bachelor pieces with chat; gt; you'll find a lot of information on how you can use chat gypsy on other ai tools to write assigned to the paper. by the way, i'm not saying you should do it. some universities have reacted with, complete a i bonds, but unfortunately it's very hard to identify which techs have been written by a i. as in july 2023 opened a i the mother company of touch, cvt shut down. it's a, i classify it. so it was supposed to determine the likelihood that a text passage has been written by another guy,

but it has an extremely low rate of accuracy and got it wrong 3 times out of full. other universities have called for most student presentations instead of writing to get around the problem. remember the university and probably mentioned it completely abolish spots so that the sees the new students. that's the 1st move of it's kind of plagiarism has always been a problem in science. now a chat box have made it even worse. the shortcomings of a, i think large language models visa. i programs the process and generate human like language they kind of produce and a thing that is not in that database. so they won't come up with new ideas or solutions, but more or less copy paste parts of the tax that they've been set. and there's another problem, hello and what like very sophisticated or the complete tools they repeatedly try to guess the next word and a sentence in the process. they are prone to making a false information, a phenomenon, sometimes called hallucination. that means all chatbox introduce false information

. this ranges from about 3 percent in the most advanced shape between model 2 or rate of around 27 percent. one of google's models, wrong information. any of this is my main. you won't get a good grades, but it's a little based on a wrong information. might negatively impact millions of people. however, i can still take a positive role here. it can help with some of the more tedious elements of law making. for example, searching and citing laws that already exist this good significantly shortened the process. the politician inputs the great claims, but keeping that proposal origin a secret was intentional and but his objective was not just to resolve a local issue, but also to spark a debate on the potential benefits of a i that's all from me today. but i'm see you next time the

you, how many platforms can you handle single tenuously without having the feeling that it's just too much you might see me. how much can we do simultaneously? multitasking these, the modern because if we do too much, we get it all wrong. we mess things up, risking brain damage. so let's stop this self sabotage, humans and multitasking watch now on youtube. v. w documentary. so you don't think and feel the same way you expect and one different things from life and your parents do i just want to pursue what steps nice on fire or you think your kid is 2 different, risky, irresponsible,

unreasonable, all stuff. and i want my son to become a doctor to in the canal. it's time to to us. and then when generations class this week on dw the of these kinds of ships, once gabby goulds, and merchandise that are on the word, the button after that time is up, 80 percent of them end up as hazardous waste sites on so that she ensures like godaddy and buckets done alone in india and still on the phone with dish going to meeting costs and endangering workers. today we explore bond with dishes. you don't see breaking yard to assess the human and environmental tools of the shipping

industry, the should the does a 32 year old fisherman spend half of his life catching fish along the sheet that on the coastline a bundle dish. but recently, the noticed a traveling change in the marine ecosystem, it will have one on the last 8 of the area that was much more associated with the mazda. what about the boat would be full, but the 2 nets, i don't know, even 20. the other 2 not see less specially i'm not.