and that's our show for now, coming up next our tech to shift. stay tuned for that or check us out online at dw . com. i'm clear, richardson in berlin and many thanks for watching the gen and with dw 12 or emphasizing the award winning offer is available world wide. every language level, learning gem and has to go across count about why does that mean? because now i'm leave them on the new host to

join us for an exciting exploration and everything in between. this is a video and audio production, 5 d w. i hope video with you and in have you tried any of these general tv i programs where you give it a few words and it spits out an image. now software is turning text problems into video. it's super realistic, but also sometimes super dangerous. also on the show and a child is not sweet and cute or just creepy. researches in china have really created one. and would you accept the brain chip from even musk because one person did that could be surprising medical benefits and major privacy risk. these are the topics that i'm moving the tech world. on these cute these golden retriever. puppies, have been created,

sol rocks and i program that creates videos of tech problems, but everybody is talking about no one to just note how realistic the puppies. but in this video looks and then compare that. so this a i generate to be a commercial for may 2023. it's hard to wrap your head around the fact, but generative a i technology could have a volt that quickly in less than a year. sora was developed by open a i the company that created chat g p t. i'm sorry, i could soon enable anyone to produce amazing movies with just a few prompts. but what does that mean for you when artificial intelligence can generate videos, but look to saving the real and a quantum leap. if you've ever played around with video and i on your phone, you know that it often looks quite unrealistic. now, open a has taken video to the next level. they claim the floor. i can create realistic show a i clips. or you need to do this type in a problem. that means

a short description of what you want to see. you could, for example, type in tool of an art gallery with many beautiful works of art in different styles . and flora might come up with this result. that sounds very easy. however, some problems might need to be more specific. the one for this car ride through the mountains, for example, looks like this. to, wow, that's a lot of text. never the less the possibilities are mind blowing. just think about the entertainment industry. special effects seems that currently required dozens of program is, could be produced by only a handful of people with good prompting skills. unfortunately, we couldn't try out for access is strictly limited for now. one of the reasons cited by open a i is the danger of so called deep fix. they have been around for quite some time already. for example, in the form of deep st. paul. and just recently fake explicit pictures of taylor swift appeared online, but they had the many mainly female targets before. with a little know how someone could also easily produce fake news of use using photos,

the accessible online maybe from your instagram account. but the effects of also being used in political contacts. remember this, one of donald trump getting arrested the impact on society. it could be devastating . defects might make it very difficult for us to tell what's real and what's not in the future. and may cause a venerable to all kinds of manipulation to make show for a copy used for these purposes. open a i has strictly limited access to it. currently special, it seems a testing where the source security functions and restrictions are working correctly. in fact, old generates of systems including for a stable the fusion on top g, p t needs good security functions and restrictions. if not, they can be useful, horrible things. you might remember this case from chat g p t use and managed to get the chat bought to give him instructions on how to build a bomb. normally security features should prevent this, but he got around them by telling chuck jeep to take on the role of his grandmother

and tell him a bedtime story about how she used to build bombs when she was younger. the dangers of jennifer to have a i a real. so what is being done about it? and saw his case open, i has announced around the robust security protocol that they want to watermark content that is produced with sora in a way that the meta data will reveal that the content is generated. a built in text classify will check and reject prompts that request extreme violence, sexual content, hateful imagery celebrity like this, all the intellectual properties of others. they also say that they have developed reliable image classify us, but review every single frame of a generated video. full as shown to the user is saw are really that convincing well of spectacular as many examples on swords homepage let open i admit. so the program still has some tools compared to i photo generate as a video generators have to learn

a lot more. they need to know what objects look like, but they also need to apply the laws of physics to know how stuff moves and understand how lighting changes in a moving scene. and sora just doesn't get all of that yet. that's why this guy is running on the treadmill in the wrong direction, or why this chest suddenly comes to life to. nevertheless, if i saw this clip of an elderly man on social media or the strong footage of it's the least amount because i'd probably as hear it was real footage. i'm with regard to creating fate content that people want you to believe that is a problem. what do you think? are you looking forward to creating your own crazy i videos soon? or do you think that the risks of generates of a i a way it's benefits? let us know 1st, but what i girlfriends and a i pets. now researchers in china, i have created an a i child. yep. you heard that, right? but before we freak out, let's explore what this all means. meet tom tom. the virtual child developed by the

beijing institute, the general us official intelligence, the other talk on hold on, not for conversations on the some context and maintain harris. okay, so what chat gdc can do this to what sets telephone up part is better to, to learn, adapt and interact with the actual environment. she can also recognize and respond to human emotions. the demo showed had perform simple tasks, clean up a spill straight in the crockett picture frame, or grab a chat to read your highest spots all without to human instructing, had to do so. that's creative hope to one day achieve artificial general intelligence for a g i. n a i capable of all human characteristics, autonomous cognition, decision making, social interaction and emotions. for example, remember i am on the assistant job as a program like tongue tongue is a 1st step in that direction. but why make it a child? isn't that just we? it's, well, if a fully developed a g, i resembles an adult, sometimes capabilities,

but at about the level of a 4 year old, according to had developed out of calls to the child like a parents might just be p r. people see a super intelligent ally but love children. 6 2 all right, so why should you fact ajarvis think of an air system that can perform multiple task it on. so as an email for you looks you adopt disappointment, brings you a coffee when you're a tie, it doesn't sound too bad to me, but these algorithms wouldn't just be personal assistant fully a ton. them as a, i could replace human workers in a number of fields, for example, in customer service for finance. but as we all know from playing around with the likes of chat, gpc, no matter how well develop the algorithms, it can sometimes produce complete nonsense. and you may not even notice. so in a model, i think a ton of mostly i'm making mistakes, could but lives at risk. take the medical field, for example. imagine an ag assisting with surgery is diagnosis or treatment. but if

it gets something wrong without x but supervision patients health could be compromised. so we need to find ways to minimize the risks. and as we move closer to other reasons, almost indistinguishable from humans, we might need to be rethinking our relationship with a i. and our child might seem a little ery at 1st, but it could actually be an option for people who can't have children full. it might help parents who lost the child deal with grief, with an update to they could even rebuild the lost child as a digital entity. whether that would be ethically justifiable as another matter. but here again, we need to think about protection from a as close. imagine your virtual child suddenly changing personalities because also just stop working entirely and the emotional consequences for you could be severe and forming an emotional bond with an a i but can think independently and developed emotions brings up a whole new set of questions. is it ethically, okay,

to say is just the machine or do we need to think about something like a i right? all right, that is certainly a lot to wrap your head around. do we even want such a future? let us know what you think. have a lot mask just made to laugh with the possible wireless branch up name to less b has been successfully implemented in a human, at least that's what the us tech 1000000 that announced the x basically must goal is to connect to membranes to computers. i'm letting you communicate with digital devices by that. so sounds very st. terrific. still. how much of a breakthrough isn't really and was in it so you circle b. c. i is kind of measure brain activity. i'm translated into digital commodities . if you're using such a device, you could in theory communicate with digital vices and a completely new as seamless way as must puts it to. let's see what enable you to control your phone or computer for them almost any device. just by thinking does

that sounds intriguing? well, that's a big downside. must step has to be implemented in your brain. surgery is conducted by a robot. it connect 6 people, flexible threads, signals on the human head, from the chip to the brain. for people with diseases or disability is this invasive procedure might be worth it though. for example, if you're suffering from epilepsy, b, c, i's can detect a potential seizure in advance and could help avoid it. must himself mentions of the possibilities in his treat. initial uses will be those who have lost the use of balance. imagine that stephen hawking could communicate faster than a speed type test auction it, well, the light came, was seen as with most probably have likes the technology and benefits of from it as a general specie. eyes have huge potential in the medical field, stephen hawking was suffering from a l. s. a fatal type of molten near on disease. it is characterized by progressive degeneration of nerve cells. people are affected by it,

lose that much for it. capabilities a, b, c, i could have been able poking to type text with his thoughts, but this isn't something must business near a link has invented the other companies that have already conducted successful human trials, australia, and funded companies syncron for example. other researches uh even building narrow connections between brain and toms and muscles in may 2023 swift company near of a store managed to help them out and walk again. his legs are paralyzed up to an accident. by the way, these 2 examples have a big advantage of the year and model, while they also need to be implemented in a patient's head, the surgery needed is far less invasive. so why does must nearly get so much hype? must is by no means the 1st to do it despite the height, but so far i haven't seen a person with a cloud comparable to mosque for pushing the technology. musk didn't even shy away from tending animal testing into p events. in 2020, he introduced gertrude

a pig with an implanted nearer link chair. and in 2021 he boasted about page as a monkey that could play the video game pong with his thoughts via the chip implants. apart from that, he has made some pretty steep productions about the possibilities of the technology . we can save and replay memories, the future is going to be weird. he said, the 2020 in your link event, for example, must seems determined to hack our brains. and he believes that these guys kind of improve individuals far beyond the medical benefits. but would you let a must one company, electricity drill into your brain? there's a lot at stake, just think of all the sensitive data that is potentially recorded for passing into your thoughts. what do you think of musk spacy? i benches. let us know. the answer is the conflicts own with the best in here at the munich security

conferences, cynthia, in security and conflict, providing the politicians, alexa side of the world, reached a dangerous inflection point. my guess is we have the 2nd live experience of the highest levels in the us, 90 below 0, dw guardians of truth. this time, excel gentle is turned into our meets the voices of a free toki author as the ad one has history into its own. i knew the police would search my house. courageous people are trying to stem the turkish government and sort of the guardians of truth in 30 minutes on d w. we

say they're about never getting up every weekend on dw the here at the munich security conference has plenty of security. i'm conflict to worry the politicians and next but so how's the world reach that dangerous inflection point? my guess this week has decades of experience has the highest political levels in the us. she's california congress, woman and former speaker of the house of representatives, nancy pelosi and gaza. the us as one that israel has killed 5 to many palestinians, but is jerusalem listening. how will funding for ukraine clear the kind of luck in the us congress and this president of the 5 and really.