[000:00:00;00] the border areas with russia, with belarus, or the areas that are partially, temporarily occupied, zaporizhzhia, kherson, dnipro, and, if we say, the donetsk direction, it is very difficult, meanwhile, the plans for the construction of an underwater tunnel between russia and occupied russia-crimea, russian and chinese are temporarily discussed. businessmen report secret negotiations according to the washington post, according to the publication, the parties met at the end of october, saying that russia is increasingly afraid of attacks on its key logistics route, an illegal bridge, through kerchensk strait, they continue to use it, primarily because of the strike from ukraine, it is feared, however, it is difficult to say whether the negotiations were successful. well, analysts of the publication emphasize that

the construction of a tunnel next to the existing bridge ... will face huge obstacles, works of this scale will cost billions of dollars and take years, moreover, such construction will be complicated by the fact that it is located in the zone of military operations. meanwhile, ukraine receives warships from partners, this will help ensure the functioning of the grain corridor in the black sea, president volodymyr zelenskyy stated this during the conference following the results of the meeting within the framework of the grain from ukraine initiative, according to him, the grain corridor without russia is one of the biggest achievements of the year, however, for the security of its operation, our state needs certain means , further details, an agreement with several states regarding powerful support by ukrainians, but on a different convoy technique, that is , the appropriate boats will be transferred to us and are already being transferred, we have strengthened and already

increased. this chain of iron road, there is already a positive answer, when these systems will protect that region , i will say so, because the corridor is important there, and the people, our people in the odesa region are important to us, very important, with pppo there is a shortage, you know, it is not a secret, but because no less, that is, it is important that there are agreements, there is a positive... the corridor is working, god willing, we will increase the volume and security, security in the odesa region, we will start with this topic, contact us serhiy bratchuk, spokesman ukrainian volunteer army south, military expert, mr sergey, we congratulate you, we are glad to see you, glory to ukraine, glory, i congratulate my colleagues, good morning,

glory to the heroes, i want to start just in time. from the information that ukraine receives warships from partners, but i want to understand now, well, first of all, i understand that it is meant that there should be basing ports for these same ships somewhere, when this should happen, in what way happen, and in what quantity ukraine can get them, do you have an understanding of this, well, let's talk about the fact that this is really such a breakthrough in that is happening in... the topic we call the grain corridor, or the sea, ukrainian, i emphasize the export corridor, really the issue of convoying, precisely these civilian ships that are heading to or leaving the ports of great odesa, it arose from the very beginning, the functioning of the previous grain corridor corridor, then there were quite a lot of options, but how should this sea route work , actually they agreed on what they agreed on, and

that grain agreement has long since gone down in history, and apparently no one actually knows about it anymore mentions who is not in the topic at all and really does not remember, maybe if we are talking about a purely ukrainian sea corridor, then firstly , the topic works, and secondly, in my opinion, it is a very important aspect for today, which also has to operate a mode of information silence, because the enemy monitors everything related to this, we understand that for today and for the near and future perspective, there will be no participation... russia, for example, will not be on this route, and thank god therefore, it is necessary to secure all these ships, we understand very well that the greatest threat - these are missile strikes by the russian federation, these are attacks, including from tactical aircraft, of course there must be escort , escort including and possibly taking into account, well, we do not know the details yet, taking into account the mine-explosive danger that

exists on today in the black sea, because it actually has signs of a minefield, but only in seawater, because russia continues to mine or strike with these mines, to drop them. right in the direction of the sea corridor, so escorted by boats, we are not talking about some big fleet now, as far as i am concerned i understand, because it is unrealistic, but as for certain boats, a certain project, specifically the naval direction, i think that this is already true, you see, the president confirmed that there are also agreements regarding basing, i think that all this will be taken into account with the fact that we have a war going on, that it must be in certain places where the enemy will not reach , well, at least, at least he will not know about it, here, of course, a lot depends on our allies, on our partners , from how they will meet, in what

format and where possible, with their participation, too basing, escorting these ships , in your opinion, how many are needed now, relatively speaking, for the convoy of one ship, here are such ships, one, two, more, does the number play a role here at all? well, the first question is for military and maritime specialists, it is clear , it will depend, as far as i understand it, the logic here should be based on what the convoy will be like, this or the next time, how it will be built, on which bases, let's say so , moments, therefore, i think that here it is really not about the quantity, in itself, in itself. the importance of this moment, firstly, and secondly, that indeed, this is a certain element of additional security, we also have to understand that, but the use will already take into account the security situation that exists in the black sea area, and

of course in the sky above the black sea. by the way, i would like to talk to you about the sky, literally a few minutes ago the quote of the president was announced that the most difficult situation is now with air defense in... regions bordering russia and belarus and also near the frontline regions, respectively, on the one hand yes , there is this problem, on the other hand on the other hand, well, i have already quoted boris pistorius today, i am the minister of defense of germany, and after his visit, it became known that the airists will be additionally supplied to ukraine, a lot was also said about it during ramstein-18, so these statements, decisions and in principles of effort. to support ukraine with anti-aircraft means of anti-aircraft defense, is this enough to close these issues, which are urgent , which were voiced by the president, well, first of all, we need to talk

about priorities, because everyone in society should understand whether we would like it or not , for today, at least for sure, for the near future, it is physically impossible to cover the entire territory of our country with a suitable air defense dome, today the priorities are indeed defined, these are the front-line zones, these are the largest cities, we are of course talking about odesa, about odesa itself, because these are ports , and well, odesa, in fact, i always say this, is also a front -line, zone, front-line region, because we have missile strikes from the air force, the air force behaves very actively, the air force, as i have already said , tries to mine or at least strike mines from the air, lay these mines exactly in the direction of the sea corridor we are talking about, exactly in the direction of the south of the odesa region, i will remind you about the danube cluster, that is , today these priorities are defined,

in particular, we are talking about odesa, including odesa. next, complete silence, because you have to understand perfectly well, this is treason, treason, that no one will cut a ribbon from... a festive orchestra on the border, for example, or on the territory of the odesa region, and so on and so forth , look, we put here a new air defense system that will protect odesa, the war continues, the war is brutal, and of course it is worth reminding people about this every time , because it is a priority, i have already said where this or that system will be used, of course, it depends on the military, they determine, let's say, those zones, those locations, where it can be, the most rational use, it is necessary to cover the sky of course. we're talking about the fact that this threat, as i said, is constant, i hope that and another point, which is important, in my opinion, we see how today there, they are not sleeping in muscovy, the war should really go to the territory, at least

the front-line regions of the russian federation, and it is in the energy sector, including, for example, that they should feel it, what is happening, well, actually, it is not only playing in two, it's in... let's play on the prejudice of the situation that may arise, in particular in the south of our country, let them deal with extinguishing fires, restoring the energy infrastructure, this, although small, but in a certain way can reduce the number of strikes including our infrastructure. mr. serhiy, regarding the potentially second illegal construction that can be added to the first illegal construction, i am posting about the underwater tunnel, the information about which appeared in the washington post for literally 30 seconds, i, it is difficult for me to ask questions, because i think it's a thing, and i think you, you too, it will be difficult to ... comment on it, but i

will still ask, as you understand, the chances that it will maybe turn into something, which one, or is it just throw in well, it looks more like an informational one dumping, there is no other information, but as you said, it must be destroyed, mr. dich , there will be two objects, i think that the security service and the defense forces will get along with this and do everything as it should. thank you, mr. serhiy, for joining the broadcast, brachuk, spokesman of the ukrainian volunteer army south, military expert. he was on a live video call. well, now let's talk about the fact that the modern means of rep allowed the armed forces of ukraine to advance south of bakhmut in september of this year. ukrainian military disrupt russian communications along the entire front line. this conclusion was published by the institute for the study of war, and attack drones are successfully used to disrupt offensive operations in russia. at the same time , the enemies

are not able to resist this with the means of radio-electronic warfare. the institute added that there are problems with the functioning of the rebs in russia. the connection is unstable and unreliable, analysts say. oleg kalashnikov is now in direct contact with us. this is a service officer of the 26th artillery brigade named after roman dashkevich. our congratulations to you. good morning. good morning. mr. oleg, we have just provided information to the institute for the study of war with reference to our own analysts there. open sources, and what information is real, what, what, what, what kind of situation is real , they really have problems with rebs, well, they were very saturated with rebs, somewhere it was 1:10 km, at one time, there really were such stations, standing different modifications, and different radio judges, but they really did not supply them, more rarely they appeared and began to be installed, they cannot completely...

drink the entire territory, as it was before, and indeed, they already have such gaps in the defense in this case, huh, and tell me then, what we also voiced, that it is our side , with the help of the rebs, that is capable of creating problems, well, along the entire, in fact, along the entire line, or really that's right, and in terms of combating their unmanned aerial vehicles, strike drones, well, how much... the front line is saturated with our guys, i can't tell you for sure, because this is somewhat not my topic, but about what we are fighting with drones with the help of rap tools, this is really true somewhere, moreover quite a few new developments of ours appear on the front, we can observe developments that concern both drones that suppress them, and we also work against the likes

of loncet, super. the cube is also theirs, by the way, and lancets, as frequent a phenomenon as they are, well, in principle, they are also showing off that they are like, oh, this is our water waffle, it’s enough, well, to call them a super weapon, of course, it’s difficult, here, but really their front is quite saturated, and it turns out that when they have some supplies, i would say the party, then there are more of them, they gradually, of course, their number decreases, then it increases, that is, with such periodic actions of a peculiar kind, ugh, then i have a more professional question for you, as for the representative of the 26th brigade, i would like to know how their russian artillery works now, how active are the shelling of our positions, respectively, as the armed forces respond in a counter-battery fight, as successfully as possible. can it be done now? in

those directions that they consider to be their priority, there is really a concentration of artillery, and of different calibers, we can it should also be noted here that this is an anti-aircraft missile and self-propelled artillery, it also directly applies to ordinary howitzer artillery, this is 122-152, their millimeter, then such directions where they are trying to conduct their active such... countermeasures and there are quite a lot of them presented, however, if you follow the general staff's assembly, there we already have the number of destroyed artillery up to 7-9. so we have almost destroyed them, so we can say that we are quite successfully conducting a battery-based fight in this direction, they have a significant the number of already destroyed, these are self-propelled installations, and it is very difficult for them to replenish them, since there are already few of them in the arsenals,

or those that are, we can observe space satellites, they are without barrels, so they generally replenish the custom already, old ones analogs still soviet there1, we can observe the d-44, such an artillery weapon is very old, but still they manage to restore and send somewhere from 200 to 300 barrels of barrel artillery to the front, and it usually brings death, due to the fact that they no longer have enough trunks artillery, they bring the mlrs closer to the front line, because of this their destruction also increases. that is, without benefit, and also because they had less artillery production, they began to pull up tanks closer, to use them as an ahta, and we can see for the second or third time, even a month in a row, the very active use of their fabs, high-explosive

artillery bombs, controlled, guided, i saw the video, but literally, when literally yesterday, the rashists were there... they were very sorry, their barrel of revenge broke, and they say, probably the korean projectile did not fit a little in terms of size, and the problem turned out to be like this, in general, such problems can often be fixed with low-quality projectiles, the barrels are broken, this is one of the reasons, it is the wear of the barrel, the metal just gets tired, a very large shot, which trunk is not designed, and of course it is not you... it gets and breaks, and it can be different , it can be, like that, a flower, a flower bud will break, it can just be, a hole will appear in it, and so on appears more often, i agree with you, information that is korean projectiles, they explode right in the barrel, and this leads to the fact that

artillery weapons become unworthy, in unfitness, and can no longer work, it can depend both directly on the projectile itself, and of course: on the very quality of the gunpowder , they were stored there for a very long time, i have a suspicion that they are still being supplied with scripts from soviet times, ugh, tell me, by the way, you said that they often pull up the rszv already to the front line, and the intensity of shelling from the side russian occupiers, or she is decreasing now, what can be fixed, and accordingly the nature of these? shelling, you have already talked about it in part, but i would like to understand a little more, in the directions where they consider it a priority, they have such a dense artillery fire, and it is carried out by them, you can say 24 hours a day, of course it increases, the power, this is

when they try to counterattack somewhere, or where we show some active actions, they strike at our positions to stop. our movement is, of course, in this case, it can be said that they do not have a shortage of shells, it is not observed where they believe that they need some activity and they try to take the initiative on the battlefield, but this is certainly not on the entire front line and this, no no and the number of shots we could see before when they had better ammo after all. well, of course, with the amount of their directly high-quality artillery, and they impress here with different calibers, of course mortars work on the first line of contact,

and mortars should not be underestimated, this also such a significant fire factor directly, which is used by infantry-assault units, we are already working in more such rear areas , large-caliber artillery is already working, we have it 152. 155 caliber, and of course, the rsso is also being tightened, as well as they have the same the very principle of using artillery, like ours, literally 30 seconds, you said, they focus on priority directions and actively use artillery there, is it logical to assume then that on other directions, which they consider not priority, well, they work unless there are mortars and no more, because they focus on some specific points there, 30 seconds literally, well, in principle , they have long-range artillery should be located where they do not consider it necessary, but really large-caliber artillery, they are more concentrate where they consider themselves a priority. nevertheless, they have reduced it and they have to use it more or less somehow rationally. thank you for these clarifications for

joining the broadcast, oleg kalashnikov, this is the press service officer of the 26th detachment roman dashkevich. he was on a live video call. we will discuss the avdiiv direction further on, so the third wave of offensive on the avdiiv direction was launched by the russian invaders on november 22. heavy fighting continues there. the enemy is covering the positions of our soldiers with artillery. and drops aerial bombs. the defense forces of ukraine repulse the attacks and hold their positions. it is not possible to resume the large-scale offensive of the enemy, as the institute for the study of war says. for example, in october, the russian army suffered huge losses in the avdiyiv direction, in particular, in armored techniques so now the military command of the russian federation needs to demonstrate active battles involving infantry - analysts say. serhiy tsihotskyi is in direct contact with us. this is an officer of the 59th separate unit. topihot brigade named after yakob handziuk. our greetings to you, mr. serhiy. good morning. good morning. glory to ukraine. glory to heroes. mr. serhiy, now we

are once again focusing on analytics from the institute for the study of war, but we would like to learn the facts directly from those who are on the front line and fighting with the enemy is this information from the institute that they are trying to make a third offensive true, but... and they are throwing everything they can, but you can't compare it with the previous two, because the volumes are not the same, are they? true, yes, true, yes, maybe, i can agree with this, well, they really use technology less , practically, because, well, the weather conditions and the fact that there are not as many technologies as there were, and they start using them to preserve somehow, probably for some future actions, maybe when the weather is good the conditions of doses... they should advance on a wide front, now more and more with such infantry assault groups, they make attempts at point

strikes in different places, i.e., you know, like in sports, they hit at one point, if only to distract attention, then they start in the second direction, somewhere on the right, on the left, to do the same, ugh, but i will say that according to the positions of our brigade, it means that it is under control, which means that not a single position has been lost, everyone is holding on, all the attacks made by the enemy are repelled , well, i will now quote the head of the kyiv city military of the administration of vitaly barabach, he said that the russians are trying to surround avdiivka from the flanks, that is, there are attempts both to enter the city head-on and to bypass it from the flanks, and that he also noted that it is important here that the occupiers are unable to capture the city, and that is why they are trying to destroy it it to the foundation.

this is the standard logic and strategy of the russian measure, there cannot be anything else in principle, this is a direct quote, but accordingly, and if they destroy avdiivka, then well, they will actually demolish everything to the foundation, then what is the point of admiration exactly of this city, what strategic value will it represent for the russian invaders? you very correctly said that they are destroying, and the question is good, so they don't need the city of avdiivka, they don't need people who are waiting for them there, they just need the name, the political name, the geographical name of avdiivka, and that they are there , and that's all , they don't need anything else, this is not only observed, it is observed almost everywhere along the front line, as you can see, both bakhmut

and avdi were destroyed. which is now constantly on everyone works for it by all means of impression, that is why they have intentions, for this you can see, even if you look more broadly, how putin has concentrated there, well , it doesn’t matter whether putin or vasilych is there, collective putin is theirs, even for the second time he is coming to rostov-on-dana, for that, well, for what, in order to support them morally, probably there, and psychologically, in this direction, and they need some kind of victory, but, but, everything that is being done, there is no success to date, for this wait a minute, mr. serhiy, i want to ask about their tactics, they hers traditionally they do not change, their urban assault is accompanied by small groups, armored vehicles with the support of artillery, are there any changes? in different ways, you know , in different ways, why, somewhere, in small groups, right there, a small group is going to storm, somewhere

they send, one group after another, that is. er and i will say that er, groups, er, so combined, from different, from different subdivisions, ugh, that is, there are those in the lead who lead there , others just give the number for mass, that is and in different places, that is, they went in one place, artillery all the time works, practically. er, er, and these assaults begin under the artillery, the artillery is still working, and they are already leaving, well, this is also a signal and attention for us that we must be vigilant, watch their movements. ugh. and also, here is an interesting quote , in my opinion, dmytro snigov, a military observer, says that we can talk about a change in the tactics of the russian occupiers in the avdiyivka area, if before it was mass offensives, that is,

armored columns under the cover of one. battle tactical group, now it is the tactics of the wagner pvk, which they used during the assault in soledar and bakhmut, well, that is, groups from eight to 15 people, it really is, literally 30 seconds to answer you, yes, yes, yes, thank you, mr. serhiy, five, 10 people, somewhere around that, with such groups , thank you for joining the broadcast , serhiy tsykhodskyi, this is an officer of the 59th separate motorized infantry brigade named after yakov hondzyuk, he was on the live video from well , we will talk on this, we will thank, apparently, nikita mikhalov and i, nikita mykhalyov, serhiy chernyshov, stay with us, pa-pa,

shavorons, who are approaching victory. through the wild whistle, under the explosion of mines, gathering all the will, let's go to ours, let's liberate our lands together, join our fighters, the brigade of the national police rage. the questionnaire can be filled out on the nabirua website or by calling 097, 725-25-13. ukrainian gives freedom. occupiers tighten. tail, having heard about ukrainian cotton wool and cotton, and we have not yet mentioned words of 30 letters, although we will have affectionate words for everyone, we will not be destroyed, we will be protected by the power of the three forms of the future tense, we will go, we will go, we will to go to victory in spite of everything, ukrainian: the language

of the free. first, they destroy everything around them, and the russians seem to save the children, kidnap them to the territory of the russian federation, and then, what they already did almost 100 years ago, genocide. i know 13 stories of children who survived sexual violence by the russian military. ukrainians, who were captured by the red world, are subjected to both physical and psychological abuse. and why is uncle vova the president of the whole world? i was in the shot, i say, where is it like this? stories of divorces and long it was very hard to go home for 5 days with my brother and i, now in the documentary stolen childhood: yaana and i, a ukrainian , today at 10:15 p.m. exclusively on the air of the only

news. i am a russian warship, i propose to lay down our weapons and surrender, a warship, and glory, we still have a brother at molony. fate will smile, our little ones will die, like cross-country in