of ukraine to the aggression of the russian federation, their crimes in ukraine, in order to keep this support together, and at the same time, as we can see, in recent weeks, yes, on the contrary, the articles are not so much about russian aggression as about possible strife within ukraine itself, i it seems that it is very dangerous, i think that we should not play along with it all together, and i am convinced that you, in your comments to colleagues, switched your attention to key problems, which are safe, well, that's it, and i hold the frame when colleagues turn to foreign, or journalists with such questions, i emphasize, i'm sorry, our key problem now is russia, the conflict exists and the war is real, not an imaginary one between ukraine and russia, or rather russian aggression against ukraine, and this is how he answers these questions, although we are aware that there is no smoke without fire, and the fact that this diarrhea... of deputies, some

of the servants of the people, when they attack the military leadership so aggressively, there is no reaction from the leadership of the servant of the people, the president's office, certainly shows that this is not self-activity, and this unpleasant, i think it is very important for all parties, to put a stop here, say break, disperse in this ring and let's not do boxing, but work together for victory, because we still have a long sprint distance to this victory, oksana moroz is the author of the book in the nation of vegetables, how not to become vegetable, the struggle for the truth, and she works with communication issues, how the government communicates with society, how society communicates with the government, and here she says that what is happening is a communication failure of the presidential team and that they simply did not communicate in time , is it enough in your opinion, since you are enough...

there was a lot of experience in the communication of the government and society , would it be enough if zelenskyy came out , for example, during his evening broadcast, video message, said, there are no problems, we, we do not have any questions, we are one team, we work for victory, well, in fact, this is what the positive bloggers of bankovo ​​are saying right now, whether it is freelance advisers, i saw some such statements, but of course it does not sound... high-ranking servants of the people allow themselves to continue this rhetoric of theirs , i will remind you that the same mariana b, she positions, here in the posts in her social networks, all these daily statements, not just as a representative of the servant of the people, but specifically as a representative of the national security committee, in order to add to her positions, her words, this flood of greater weight, greater expertise, and assesses the activities of the military there from the position. as the head of the subcommittee

on civil control. it seems to me that it would be right here, well, some kind of responsibility for such actions, if ukraine today spills into the international media in the context of, well, some conflicts, this is necessary to terminate very harshly and dismiss such people from the positions they hold, because the military posts have certain sensitive and closed information, i consider it wrong, and as for communications with society, it seems to me that the question here is not even to leave and to say, everything is fine with us there, and more seriously, to communicate with what is happening at the front, well, here is a small example, two days ago , president zelenskyi made an important statement in his daily video, i congratulate her very much, carefully i heard that it is on the last bet not only the issue of the front was discussed, but also the fortifications, and he said such a phrase that we assigned to individuals.

attention to fortifications and, believe me, there will be enough concrete and mines in the state, well, he said, and who understood, you understood, the society is fed by marathon, i think, they did not understand anything, but between the lines there sounded a very serious truth about the situation at the front, about that there we are now paying special attention to defense, that it will require us to strengthen the defense there, fortifications, it is really it is very important, the russians, wherever they go , change everything. are building these fortifications, and ukraine must do the same in order to get our borders there, and this must be communicated to the society, so that the society was not frightened, when suddenly a true article appears, that the counteroffensive is not such that tomorrow we will be there in the borders 91 of the year, and that is why it seems to me that this communication, and you see, the government is ready only for such a very complementary one and still with applause, some kind of communication, well, this is wrong, it is necessary to go to ms. irina, david

arahami, the leader of the servant of the people parliamentary faction, said that the heads of the parliamentary factions had signed a memorandum of understanding behind closed doors. the next elections will be held only after the end of martial law, that is, six months after , in six months, or rather, after the end of martial law is announced, you also signed this memorandum, can you tell what kind of document it is, yes, for many years in the ukrainian parliament, with the support of the european parliament, such an important dialogue is ongoing , it is called rapprochement positions of the majority of the opposition factions , on the reform of the parliament, bringing us closer to the european union, well, that is, this is such an important platform, it takes place in the mode of records, but every time we agree on such a final document, and here during the last

such dialogues that took place two weeks ago, and we talked not only about the situation in the parliament, about the fact that there were few demos there. unfortunately, today there is a problem with inter-parliamentary diplomacy, with freedom of speech, and we also discussed the issue of elections, and indeed, we we all agree that the world will pay a lot of attention to the post-war elections in ukraine, they must be recognized as legitimate, and therefore they must be held democratically, in the period of war there cannot be a priori democratic elections, because we cannot ensure participation there of all participants in the process, including displaced persons and runaways. these are forced by the war and the military, and therefore democratic elections can only be held by war, and indeed such a discussion took place long enough to prepare even electoral registers, it also takes several months, and these documents were signed

, unfortunately, due to subjective reasons , the chairman of the verkhovna rada was not present, he was ill at the time, and the heads of all factions, the leadership of the parliament, as you can see, signed up to the fact that the elections should be post-war. after the end of martial law and in six months , but you know, i would like these documents, by the way, we all paid attention to the fact that david already said this in an interview with the propagandist mosiychuk, but all the leaders of the faction unfollowed me after the dialogues, and we put this document out, it has been long enough there are in the social network, but i would like the documents signed by the leaders of the parliament and the leaders of the factions to be not pieces of paper, as they are bribed from the russian federation and worthless, but still weighted and implemented, but there are other important norms in these documents , for example, about respect for freedom of speech, about the fact that parliamentary factions, for example, on communication platforms, parliamentary factions should be represented transparently and proportionally, that

inter-parliamentary diplomacy should take place, but nothing has changed in these directions, i.e. after signing these documents , four business trips have already been blocked for me, including an official one in the osce, the only one from the official delegation, we do not issue international business trips, we are not on the rada channel, we are not in the marathon, so i would really like to the same fate of non-fulfilment of this document did not befall the position regarding the elections, by the way, i wanted to ask you if there is such unity regarding the next elections, then perhaps this unity could be seen in cooperation for the future, because it is clear that now enough not... simple time and it is obvious that what will happen in ukraine, the authorities will be responsible for it. the government in the broadest sense of the word, but of course the government is more responsible for this, and whether in the dialogues or not, the representatives of the servant of the people

said that they are ready to share responsibility with the parties that are, were in the opposition, now in principles, power is power and there is power and a monomajority and the opposition, probably not quite correct, but at least among all the political parties that are represented, for example, in the parliament, and this here is the story with the government of unity , that it should return to this again, because zelenskyi would only win, obviously, if this was a government of national unity, because that is how he will have to still in the conflict with the zaluzhnyi, if he is real, then he will have to to answer absolutely. after all, as you know, i have never heard anything from the representatives about the government of national unity, this is exactly the position we have repeatedly emphasized to them, that in order for the government to finally become professional, well, we all see the problem with an unarmed eye

of the current government, it is not a subject, there are no longer half of the ministers, and there are some acting responsibilities, unprofessional, not ready to rebuild... the economy in two years of the great war is already on military rails, and obviously, the statist political forces are considering how you are right, government of national unity. this is not a division of portfolios, there is nothing to divide now, and being in power right now is really not honey, but it is a division of responsibility, it is taking responsibility for very difficult strategic decisions, but i see that the current government, it does not realize the scale of the problems , and i have never heard anything like that from them, they are satisfied with everything, moreover, the votes in the parliament, you know, about the closed for journalists, you would be surprised, i think, it has not been a year no law

was voted, where there were 226 servants, there are not 226, the maximum that the servants give is about 200 votes, well, let it be 205 and the rest - these are either satellites from the police, if we are talking about some nonsense, well, if these are laws that directed to the protection of territorial integrity, sovereignty, support of the army, european integration laws, then they gain a constitutional majority when the entire parliament votes and, of course, the opposition factions. about one more communication issue that ruslan stefanchuk, the speaker of the parliament, should pay attention to, these are the signatures that are being collected for the submission to the venice commission of a draft law that concerns religious organizations, or simply put, regarding the limitation of the activities of the russian orthodox church branch in ukraine, but stefanchuk does not articulate how he feels about it, although he should also submit this document and these more than 50 people 's deputies, among whom are 20 servants, they

basically turn to him in order for them to do it, why do you think the government does not give any clear signal that there should not be someone else's churches in ukraine and this branch of the russian orthodox church should cease to exist, well, you are right in that such letters from the servants of the people and the opzh go to the head of the verkhovna rada in the background... for example, the searches of the security service of ukraine in the pochaiv lavra, where they identified i shout again the information that the moscow popes there they say that there cannot be a single state of ukraine separate from russia, where they simply use hostile language or slander representatives of other faiths and so on, and all of this is absolutely presented somehow, yes, this law is religious, although it is about national security, i ... is also very surprised by the lack of any communication here, not only with society, but also with the parliament, because

mr. stefanchuk did not say a word, for example, to the leaders of the faction, what he thinks about this , what his actions will be, and of course already at the conciliation council, which will be at the beginning next week we will ask all these questions. you know, a small example , two days ago in brussels, an important conference was held in the european parliament, where , among other things, the government's draft law on national minorities, which has now been submitted to the parliament, was discussed, and my colleague volodymyr vetrovych there expressed his opinion that this draft law has certain shortcomings. that it needs to be finalized, well actually a very moderate opinion, no such sharp statements there, considering that this is really a draft law that is expected from us the european commission, in order to get a positive decision on the start of negotiations on december 15, our faction and its representatives usually do not make it to the eu, that is, it is a completely technical discussion of the pros and

cons of the draft law, and literally in an hour the reaction of the chairman of the verkhovna rada appears , and the vice-premiers from the pitatars of european integration, that is, they react to every sneeze of european solidarity, nobody reacts to mariyana for a month, neither david arahamiya, nor ruslan stefanchuk, neither the government, nor the minister of defense, sorry, nor the office of the president, everyone is silent, well this is madness, friends, no one reacts either, as you rightly pointed out, we do not understand the position on this collection of signatures, as i see the development of the situation, of course, this is an attempt to block consideration of the issue in the second reading, and of course, if mr. stefanchuk send this bill to the venice commission, please, and i can name thousands of examples when laws were sent: the export commission, but were voted on in parallel in the hall, the same law on oligarchs, and then, you know,

certain conclusions were not even taken into account of the venice commission, i believe that we should now consider the church bill, so-called, and if there are any recommendations of the venice commission, we will always be able to implement them, but under the sauce of this appeal , it is wrong to block the consideration of the law that concerns national security, thank you mrs. i it was iryna gerashchenko, people's deputy of ukraine, co-chairman of the european solidarity parliamentary faction. friends, we are working live on telekanaluso, as well as on our youtube platforms. and on facebook, for those who are currently watching us on platforms in on youtube and facebook, please like this video so that it is trending on youtube and subscribe to our pages. in addition, during the current broadcast, we are conducting a survey , we are asking you today whether the ukrainian government is showing unity today, yes, no,

everything is quite simple to vote on youtube, two functions, yes or no, or your comment, please write under . with this video, if you are sitting in front of the tv screen right now, pick up the phone and dial the numbers, if you think that the ukrainian authorities are demonstrating unity, then vote by calling 0800, 211-381, or 0800-21-382. all calls are free for you, at the end of the program we will sum up the voting results, and we will do this both in the first part of the program and in the second part. where we will have deputies maria ionova, andriy osadchuk and serhii taran, we will talk about political stability and what is happening in ukraine and how to overcome those trends that the western press for some reason considers political discord, i

mentioned it in the dialogue for a reason with irina gerashchenko, that today two magazines from tokyo and brussels called me and asked what is happening in ukraine, i gave them comments, explained that the office of the president of ukraine denies that there is a conflict between volodymyr zelsky and valery zaluzhny, that there is none now signs of a crisis or conflict between the supreme commander-in-chief and the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine , well, at least that is what the official representative of the office of the president of ukraine says, we are lopodalyak and of course, when officials or official spokesmen deny such information, we too should not talk about what really is, but you see , these messages have reached japan and brussels, and these messages have reached belgium

that there is some kind of conflict, and now the whole world is starting to discuss what it is for us , this means that the world is beginning to doubt that the government in ukraine works exclusively for victory, and that the main task is to defeat the russian federation, because signs of political struggle or political competition have appeared, zaikonomist writes that this competition is due to the fact that the latter measurements of zelenskyi's rating indicate that zelskyi's rating is falling, while zaluzhnyi's, on the contrary, is increasing, although we understand that zaluzhnyi is not a political player, now he is a person who speaks on behalf of the ukrainian army from the armed forces of ukraine, and of course he speaks about what is happening, he does not speak, rather, he acts in the situation that is currently developing on the russian-ukrainian front, there are no statements that he wants to enter politics, there

are no statements that he wants to become president ukraine, there are no statements about the fact that he is ready to enter into some kind of competition with zelenskyi. instead, we see a kind of nervous reaction of the representatives of the office of the president of ukraine to the publication in zzekomist, specifically, of the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine. we see the unkind comments of the people's deputy of ukraine and the deputy head of the parliamentary committee on national security and defense, maryana bezugla, who demands the resignation of the hall, so far the office of the president of ukraine is silent, and since mariana bezugla is a representative of the monomajority, this is perceived as a position monobolesh, how it is perceived as the position of president zelenskyi, and as long as this people's deputy of ukraine is in this faction, it will be perceived as the position of the president's office, that is why the world is actually

talking about it, well, what else is the world talking about, let's talk today with by the american diplomat, former special investigator of the united states america in ukraine, kurt volker, mr. volker, i congratulate you, thank you for being with us today. we are having some trouble contacting kurt walker, i hope we can get back in touch with the former special representative of the united states of america to ukraine, we know that he was the ambassador of the united states of america to nato, well, that's exactly what i wanted to talk to kurt walker about, because he said that ukraine can and should become a member of nato even before the end war and that in no way does this prevent the north atlantic alliance from deciding on ukraine's accession to nato. mr. volker, i welcome you, thank you for being with

us today. we are in touch with mr. walker. well, until we install. communication with mr volker, i will say that the day before , the former special representative of the united states of america in ukraine stated that delaying ukraine's accession to nato only encourages putin's regime to continue the war indefinitely. and, he says that until putin sees that the north atlantic alliance does not want to open the door to the ukrainian state, until nato cannot dare to make such a decision, until then putin will attack ukraine, and this threatens not only

ukraine, but also to the whole world of course, of course, we are talking about what ukraine has to receive a clear signal, as kurt volker believes, regarding joining the north atlantic alliance. well, of course, that's it. we see how the meeting of the council of nato and ukraine takes place in brussels, where dmytro kuleba, the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine, receives good feedback about ukraine's movement towards nato, and representatives of the north atlantic alliance say that ukraine has done a lot to become a member they also approve of the north atlantic alliance and the reforms carried out in ukraine during the war. however, there is a procedure that has the north must be fulfilled by ukraine in order to join the north atlantic alliance, and

this reform plan must be developed and implemented by ukraine, because next year the nato washington summit is to be held, and in this, during this, there will be a summit, well , as we expect, some decision regarding the adoption of a decision on ukraine's accession to nato, and we already have a punker on the line. mr. volker, i congratulate you and i am glad to see you on our air. mr. volcker, you stated that delaying ukraine's accession to nato is only encouraging putin's regime to an endless continuation of the war. but, i understand that you are in favor of ukraine becoming a member of the alliance even before the end of the war. the majority of ukrainians

support you, and we believe that we are also already worthy of being a member of the north atlantic alliance. what, in your opinion , prevents nato from making such a decision, and a fateful decision not only for ukraine, but for the whole world. i think nato leaders are struggling with this decision because they are worried about themselves and about escalation, but alas. having taken such a position, they only motivate putin to continue the war.

i think we should do the opposite. we have to send a signal to putin that we will not be stopped, we will not be restrained, and the fact that he will continue the war makes no sense. therefore, i call for the admission of ukraine into nato, while the war continues, does nato, mr. volker and the countries of the west now have a common vision of what ukraine's victory over russia is, and what russia's defeat in the war with ukraine is? first of all, russia's victory over ukraine, i don't

think it will happen. i think that russia does not have a well-trained army equipment, it can cause a lot of pain, but i don't think it will defeat ukraine, regarding ukraine, victory, i think there is a lot of fear in the west, about what is needed. or to defeat russia, i think that putin has already done enough, mr. volker, do you think there is a time lag that allows the countries of the west to restrain an aggressive russia from further destroying the world, how much more time is there to give at the hands of putin and say that putin does not, should not

go further or further destroy the world? well, time very important, we should not doubt and wait for anything, we should send such a message to putin already, we will continue to fight. he will continue to try to restore the russian empire as long as he is in power. steps must be taken to strengthen ukraine and make it clear that russia and putin and his imperial ambitions will never succeed. the longer we wait, the more people die. yes, mr. volker, because

on august 9... 22, in an interview with radio liberty , you said the following about putin: i will allow to quote you: putin has already decided to destroy ukraine as a state, to destroy people. he will take what he can take now and continue later. as long as he has this imperialist mindset, he will not stop. if, mr. volker, everything is so obvious that putin wants to destroy ukraine, why? in your opinion, the world community is delaying putin, because if we take into account that putin is a terrorist, then terrorists are not negotiated, they are simply destroyed, well, putin is a terrorist who has nuclear weapons, and the world is afraid that he

will apply it. he also has a large military, and if nato countries start to engage in direct confrontation with russian forces, that 's not bad, and i'll say what i said a year ago, i think we're looking at things unrealistically if we think that with that mindset we let's stop... putin's ambitions. he stated very clearly that he wants to destroy ukraine. he has an imperialist worldview that extends not only to ukraine, but also to all of europe. we must confront him and his forces. the latest news from russia, mr. walker, about

the fact that putin has followed the path of an arms race, that is, next year he will increase military spending, and then there will be an increase in military spending, he is not going to stop at ukraine and, sanctions do not work, there is no unity in the world regarding putin, what do you think this is may end for the world and the first for europe. well, first of all, sanctions work, they didn't stop russia completely, but they made the situation much more difficult for it. putin appeals to north korea for weapons. and a few years ago, everything was completely different.