brain processes and people, people will say, this was already the case in 1938, and maybe someone will think, no, it's better not to, we don't want, we, europe, which was all covered in blood, we don't want , and in order for this not to happen, it is necessary to help ukraine, really, robky is here, this is such a columnist. he wrote that the states handed over to ukraine as many as 31 abrams tanks, for which i thank them very much, in general, 6,000 of those tanks that have already been produced are standing where they belong, they should be standing, and not all of them are used, half of them are preserved, half of them are not, well what am i leading all this to, he he wrote there, roman, he wrote that 2,500 of them are on the move, so there are weapons, there is money, the question... of political will, if there is none, then

putin’s place on the cover of time magazine, this, it will be fair, this , it will be really clear journalistic work, because barbie has nothing to do there, we all who, i haven't seen this movie, but i've heard a lot of different annotations, well, it's from another opera, from barbie, you know, what she was fighting for there her rights and she did not have a vagina at the first stage, and then it appeared, no one dies, no. women not men so barbie, let's leave it alone, in the meantime, putin said that russia's activity in international affairs will only increase, let's listen. absolutely obvious. naturally, such. the process is not without difficulties, but

it has an objective and, i want to emphasize , irreversible character. as for russia, we conducted and conduct an independent, consistent and principled foreign policy course, open to constructive partnership with all countries, without exception, and unacceptable blocking confrontation, any steps that go against the charter of the united nations. our country: does not have preconceived or hostile intentions towards anyone, and of course, we expect that all international partners in relations with us will adhere to the principles of equality and mutual consideration of interests. and this is said by a person who has a warrant from the international criminal court, and for the fact that he kidnapped ukrainian children and transported them to the territory of the russian federation, and a person who cannot fly around the world, because even the president of brazil,

silva delula, said that in fact, we let's invite putin to the big twenty, well, it's not a fact that he won't be arrested, that is , even the president of brazil is just openly mocking putin, because he tells him directly, you're a criminal, dude, it's just you, you'll come, we don't mind if you arrived, but you can be arrested, because we ratified the rome statute, and in principle , there are no questions for us, uh, that's how putin tries, tries to build these diplomatic decorations, because that's what he said when he was handed over to him letters of credence from the ambassadors of different countries, and it is annual, as i understand it, happens, or with some periodicity there, and i think that most of the ambassadors who were standing there also with regard to the oon statute shook their heads, saying, we know how you fulfill the statute... oon, these decorations are

diplomatic, to him they still somehow allow themselves to be perceived as someone who he is not, i.e. he wants to be a world leader, he is not, he is not a world leader, because he did not even fly to india and took part in the big twenty via online communication, well, he is flying tomorrow, in my opinion, he is going to the arab emirates or somewhere else and the president will fly to him iran, what to do there. with israel, what do you think about it? well, it seems to me that this saying is exactly what it says about vladimir putin's place on the cover of time magazine. i hear this and immediately remember this quote, when we once taught it at the institute, it sounds like this, and you have to guess which country, this country wants peace, but only on its own terms. well, it is. the words of adolf hitler,

respectively, we are talking about the third ray, well, yes, this is just a paraphrase, but the meaning is the same, that is, actions differ from statements. with otion public position, on the ground that , houses were killed, destroyed, and so on, and so on , and what, well, that happened in russia, accordingly, they arrange events there, i was once in this hall, when the credentials was presented by the last ambassador of ukraine to russia, volodymyr elchenko, well, that's how it looked, even the st. george's hall of the kremlin, that's right, it's the st. george's hall of the kremlin, right? yes, it seems that either oleksandrovsky or georgievsky, well, it does not, does not change the essence in this case. but, look, this is against the background of what putin said in izvestia

today, and izvestia just like that , they don’t write something, but referring to some high-ranking source, russia is ready for negotiations with ukraine, in particular on the territory of the western country, it was said very briefly, and piskov repeated today that russia remains ready for negotiations regarding the settlement in ukraine, and the ukrainians allegedly stopped these negotiations, but they keep saying we are ready to sit down at the negotiation table, we are ready, but, as putin says, let him constantly confuse decrees with decrees, say let the decree be there, zelenskyi... canceled , then we let's talk, so-and-so is whispering something to him, well, i also remembered that about volodymyr ilivych and about that fool, who he always talks about in history that lenin created modern ukraine, well, that's it, well, they always talk about these peace negotiations, they

are necessary, we are not against it, but ukraine does not want it, that is, i understand that in this situation the phrase you just mentioned, as in... at the faculty of journalism or, at the faculty , that’s right, is it at the institute of journalism, as they repeated that, but on our terms, well, it’s about the same, i understand that here in the newspaper izvestia it was necessary to add, a high-ranking person said that it is there, we will conduct negotiations, but on our terms, that is, are they ready to talk about something at all, or are they not at all, they are not capable of negotiating, just with them there's nothing to talk about because they never do anything... they don't fulfill any agreement or contract? well, let's do it, let's remember what i already noted, that we are in such a certain national depression, well, i look at it a lot, because it is difficult, again, war, losses, such an incomprehensible perspective

of the future, it's the same for them, it's hard for them too, they also have a lot of dead, and if they don't count them and don't show them on television, it doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. and it is clear that today's status quo allows putin to say that we are well done, we have already defeated everyone, they ask questions even during propaganda shows, well , we have already won, what does it mean, a maniac will be able to say, i am the fifth , now the sea of ​​azov, our internal sea, they are ready to sell it as their victory. to a certain extent, it will be so, it is also necessary recognize in this concept, but if you look at the situation that they wanted to deprive ukraine of its sovereignty and destroy our state, then this is a colossal defeat, a political defeat of the russian federation, this must be realized, because they wanted to hold

a parade in kyiv, but only held it twice parades , russian burned tanks, and yes, it is difficult for us, terrible things are happening here, well, of course. but 80% of the territory of ukraine is under our control, as one scoundrel said on russian television, ukrainian children will hate us, and they know that they will, and they know what i hate them for, and there are many such nuances here, and we are ready to negotiate, negotiations, we are not against and so on, well, let's fix one topic, that means before february 2, 24 manichela also held negotiations : macron, scholz, ginsek oon, only, i don't know, ginsek nato was not there and sinzepin, although maybe they had contacts. well, it is absolutely, it is clear that in this

situation, any, any negotiations, as they say, already in a western country, in some neutral territory there, or in turkey or some other place , we are ready for this, but it is clear that in this situation they are trying to provoke... ukrainians to go there, or whether they can in some way internally create a situation where the ukrainians will say , listen, well, let's sit down there and agree on something, because many people have died, many territories have already been lost, and the forecasts are disappointing, and the counteroffensive, as the washington post writes, was not quite successful, so do they have such opportunities in your opinion , in the russians, so that... within the state , they will make ukrainians start to think that it is

possible and necessary to agree on something? well, that means i am not sure that moscow's hand is here , it is so long, here is the beginning of our conversation, i just started with the fact that we will do something like this to ourselves here, that one moscow hand did not dream of such a thing, i think it is important to talk about it, so, as far as... the negotiations are concerned, i am aware that it can happen that we do not win back all our territories, including crimea, and hello to everyone to those who ordered beds in yalta, this summer, the question is in the next, ah, it is possible to negotiate according to the model, as we had a grain agreement, when we do not sign anything with the russians, we do not recognize the loss of territory, if the circumstances will force us to go to a cease-fire, a truce there, i don't know, freezing,

frostbite, everything is possible, you have to look at our form, at our condition, at our weapons, at the position of our western partners, not in part, as arahamia said, johnson, boris, and not mike johnson, came and said, we will to fight, too, by the way, the bread on the president of ukraine crumbles, because in our country such decisions are made by the head of ukraine. states, and if there are weapons, there are airplanes, you can see how to build our military policy, here you can already see, here, you are such emotional people, here someone makes an icon for luzhnov, someone from zelensky is still doing it, someone did it then, someone will still do, we must be critical of everything, and each of our leaders must be held accountable. for what he is responsible for, and the decisions they make, well, that must be borne for them

the responsibility is ours, then on facebook they choose a commander, then something else, then a poll like whether to hold a demobilization, what do you do, dude, what do you not, tell the people directly that while the war is going on, there will be no demobilization. well, it’s an obvious thing , i can’t do it right away, that’s how it works in our country, if you are elected to the verkhovna rada, then you have to tell people that everything will be fine for three sundays, and only people who, well, not in the authorities, they can directly say that there will be no, there will be no easy decisions, and bezugla should next time conduct such surveys, which do you want a salary, 500, and do nothing or 1500 € and do one day a week,

well, this is a cool survey, it will immediately highlight everything, all schedules, once again about victories, weapons, and opportunities, it all counts, the position of the western world, tomorrow we will have a vote in the senate, if there is money, we will see what the weapons will be. if there is a question of going on the defensive, well, we will defend our country, and then, you see , things will change if someone thinks that russia is so invincible, that they are such that they do not it hurts that they, they are not dying , then go to any ukrainian telegram channel , where russian monsters are attacked, there are very, very many dead russians, and by the way , we also showed at the beginning of our program how a huge convoy was broken up in the kherson region , it was really great, and thank you, armed

forces of ukraine. let's go back to putin, because putin started threatening latvia about alleged oppression of the russian-speaking population, and the baltic countries are thinking about what to do with putin and with these threats in general, but well let's listen to putin first. if they pursue such a policy in relation to people who wanted to live in one or another country, worked there, created some benefits for this country, they will be treated like pigs, then in the end they themselves are treated like pigs and they will collide within their countries, at the same time, the head of poland's national security bureau, jacyk seviera, said that poland has only three years to prepare for the invasion of russia, and both

the poles and the residents of the baltic states. feel the pressure that putin is trying to exert, sergey, let's start with the poles, and i was thinking that they started to block our common border, and they, they are afraid of an attack by the russians, and now they decided to block it in advance , probably it is connected with the fact that, you know, all our neighbors want , to say, you are not obliged to love us, but what you are doing, well, it is not appropriate. and it, as we heard this statement, contradicts polish interests, security interests. as for the baltic countries, latvia, in particular, i will remind here one of the historical texts of the maniac, that is, vladimir putin. he used such and such word, as a result of the second world war,

lithuania, latvia and estonia were incorporated into the soviet union, so let's think about what kind of word this is in international relations, incorporated, what other word did he want to replace, the word cupation, that's what he wanted to do, and that's how they earned, in such a cunning way, now to the residents of latvia, they actually have only one requirement, that if you want to be citizens of this country and participate in the elections, you must know the language, know the exam , we have, by the way, now when obtaining citizenship, the same history, language, knowledge of the constitution , history there, in russia, by the way, the same, there you still have to take an oath of loyalty to putin, therefore, if people who live in latvia and

want to live in russia, then they should really come, let me quote the president of ukraine zelensky, who in an interview with the dom tv channel, and oleksiy matsuka, said in russian, that if you think that it is a russian land, donbass, for the sake of your children, it is better to go to russia, and then the russian propagandists, at the level of lavrov they said that zelensky is expelling russians to russia, no, no, no, there the question was about the ownership of the territory, that's all, the same story, well, it's a little easier for latvia, they are already in nato, but we are not yet. well, this statement , by the way, was made by zelenskyi in july 21st, i remember there were a lot of comments from zakharov and lavov, by the way,

they lied like that, they, they lied as usual, well, they. they simply can’t do anything else, well , let’s put an end to that, roman tsimbalyuk, thank you for participating in the program, journalist, my colleague and the author and host of the youtube channel, roman tsimbalyuk, subscribe to this youtube channel. friends, i would like to remind you that we are working live on tv channel uso, also on our youtube and facebook platforms, and we are conducting a survey , today we are asking you about this , whether you would like to see zaluzhnyi in politics, yes, no, please vote, see phone numbers, if you phone... vote 0800 211-381 - yes no 0800 211-382 no, everything is quite simple on youtube, yes no two options, or write your comment under this video. next, we have of communication, volodymyr tsybulko, political expert, people's deputy of ukraine of the fourth convocation. mr. volodymyr, i congratulate you and thank you for joining

our program today. congratulations, congratulations. we, we, we did not invent this question. and it is not us who are promoting the hard-working man into politics, he is being pushed out of the office of the president of ukraine into politics, that is why we ask what people think about it, about 2/3 of people, those who vote on youtube, here i am now watching, 68% think that they would like to see him involved in politics, no, 32%, television poll 78%, 22% would like no. you, how do you... treat all this and this story with his ostrich just well , this whole story is very similar to the story with viktor. although there was no war then, now there is a war and it is dangerous in principle for the whole of ukraine, the commander-in-chief, the head of the party , about constantly being pushed into politics, what do you

think about this? well, by the way, if we draw analogies with viktor yushchenko, then most likely it reminds me of her before the situation before the election of kuchma for a second term, but then there would be a lot of people around yushchenko the national democrats got involved and asked him to push him out carefully, but zatebankova will not push him out, and now it is a very strange story, when ukrainians take a break and do not talk about politics and about, well, electoral plans, so to speak, but the bank itself pushes out general zaluzhnyi, and this was done in the same way as in the statements of the same zelensky , let me remind you, the interview in tablydim, where he says, if some military want to engage in politics, and which military, who

did he mean, the inclusion of the unknown himself the inclusion of general zaluzhnyi in the survey, in the survey questionnaire by sociologists, and , well, it reads that this inclusion was from the submission of a bank note, because no other political force could now conduct... sociology, it was simply not allowed, so this is a very strange story, but now it is necessary to dispose of it carefully, because the high trust in general zaluzhnyi is actually a stabilizer of the entire system of power in ukraine, if the bank wants to shake it, then it is sawing, so to speak , the bitch on which it sits alone, because success or not success ... of all general zaluzhnyi direction is connected with the political perspective of zelenskyi and his entourage. well, you mentioned this sociology,

and this sociology, it was closed , and suddenly it opened, and the online publication ukrainian truth was opened, and this is also a big question, and why this sociology was opened, and why this, the trust rating they began to correspond with zaluzhnyi with the presidential rating, because, well, one word, yes, if i wanted to, well, if i, as a political technologist, had the task of switching zelsky’s electorate to zaluzhnyi’s electorate, i would have acted exactly as banking now acts, well, that is , they, they, here is sociology, i look at it, in the second round zelenskyi would have scored 42%, and zuluznyy would have scored 40%, while the margin of error is two, and this survey was conducted 3-7 november among 2,000 respondents,

but i can’t understand if there is a clear vision that there cannot be presidential elections until the end of the war, then what to rank and look at there now, well, as potential candidates, it’s not even a candidate, or is it this is exactly the story that happened when zelensky also appeared in the ratings everyone said that zelenskyi was doing there in general, but they were just testing how they supported him, did not support him in the presidential elections, and by the way, in 17-18 years they were tested then, let me remind you that alternately leaders, well , that is, potential, coming from the second there was a round, first hrytsenko, then savchenko, then vakarchuk, and then already. no, zelenskyi, that's why the situation is completely different now, because in fact the only viable state institution, which

shows that there are still effective managers in the government system, is the armed forces of ukraine, because of which, well, you can say that hard-working is the personification of such, well, i would say a collective of these traits, of the armed forces, he is communicative, he is open, he is humane, and apparently now there is a huge demand for such manager, because, because the managers of zelenskyi, that is, every small zelenskyi in every regional administration, are probably not too efficient, not too humane, do not care too much about people, and in this sense, here... er, this, i b said that this is not a political choice, what we have now is a public demand for a leader from such characteristics as are relevant.

but, if there is a request for such characteristics, then the question is whether the system is ready to exchange the ego of one person for, say, the success of the whole society, or to put the success of the country in order to satisfy the ego of one person, it is implied, i am not talking about the industrious , so it seems to me that the one who muddies... the code and all the time imposes, well, such impossible election scenarios, he is actually driving the government into a somewhat hopeless situation, which can come to the point that no matter who is nominated , well, he did not put forward a collective one zelsky instead of himself, the maximum that he can repeat is the result of viktor yushchenko in the 10th year, well, but look, actually

pulling out this case, a meritorious candidate for the presidency, well, in fact, they, uh, make themselves worse, because what what they have done with the hard-working now, will they suspend him, or will they remove him from making some decisions, there is something else, they are simply pushing him out and the rating of the people's trust in the armed forces is now equal to the trust rating of the hard-working, correct. today is also volunteer day, and among those public institutions, not state, but social, volunteerism and the church, they will determine the future winner, because voters will appeal to these, well, to these strata and public institutions, at the same level as well with an appeal to the military, because the military now well for

the time being, they will determine... er, the moral framework for the future president, but the voice of the church and the voice of volunteers in this order will be very noticeable, and now let's see how the bank built relations with volunteers and with the church, well, no one, how cool it is, but about thermos nobody has forgotten anything, not to mention the fact that nobody wants to solve the issue with the occupying fifth column, which is called the uoc, especially since now, for example, another round of alliance with the opzzh has begun, so to speak, and they in fact, they are suspending the consideration of the law by sending it to the venice commission there, that is, the party in power so often plays in pro-moscow scenarios that it turns even more people away from zelsky

personally, and well , apparently his chances are not so high today, because among those well, important state institutions, or you can say certain systems in the state , social systems, there is also local self-government, and here the government, it seems very unfortunate to me, we have 10 seconds on the air, well, well, with local self-government, the government finally beat the money, thank you, it was volodymyr tsybulko, political expert , people's deputy of ukraine of the fourth convocation, friends, during the program we conduct a survey, we ask you about the following: would you like to see zaluzhny in politics, now let's look at the interim results, 81% of those who vote by phone yes, says 10 no, then in 15 minutes we will return to the studio, people's deputies of ukraine, elizaveta yasko, yaroslav yurchyshyn, iryna friz will be with us. do not switch, we

will be with you all evening. the south of gaza is no longer safe, the israeli army is advancing, what will happen next, where will the refugees go, we talk about this in today's edition of bbc ukraine. olga palamaryuk is in the studio. eyewitnesses say that israeli tanks are already on the outskirts of hanyunis, a city in the south of the gaza strip. earlier, tsehal announced the expansion of the ground operation against the bases points of hamas. after a pause in hostilities, israel resumed the ground operation in the gaza strip, and not just resumed, but expanded it to its entire territory. earlier, let me remind you, the north of the sector was considered the most dangerous.