and thirdly, this will again create a huge wave of court cases that the state will lose, then it will not implement these decisions, there will be lawsuits in the european court of human rights, and again, we as taxpayers will pay for unprofessionalism and the stupidity of the government, which submitted to the council a raw bill of 71 pages. and if we distance ourselves from the register of debtors, is there anything positive about it at all? at the moment somehow, as i understand it, it was worked out for a very long time, both in the government and in the president's office, and apparently there were proposals from military, right away, everyone contributed a little bit, in fact, who would not go to the press today? well, of course, if the subject of the law, if the submission of the bill is the government, then it is created just like that, that is, there is a specialized ministry that prepares it, then it is agreed between the central bodies of the executive power, then it is considered at government meetings and finally. it is approved there

and only then gets to the council, but this once again says that we have a government, although the president said that he has an excellent manager who unable to write, let alone communicate such an important , perhaps the most important draft law today, today i have already heard conversations that there is just panic among people, young people, especially, what to do there to run away, i think that there are now bribes for certificates of unfitness and some holes in the border simply... they will start scaling, you know , how if someone plays dishonestly on the stock exchange, then here they have played, that is, not from the commission, it is a crude bill itself, i repeat, from the point of view of legislative technique, but much worse he is out of communication, i.e. nobody is there now i did not read it, because it is a rather large bill, there is no communication, now the president and the military will pass it like a hot cake from hand to hand, trying to transfer arrows to unpopular measures.

in the end, he will appoint an extreme government, because, well, the president should have introduced this bill, the president should have introduced it as the supreme commander-in-chief, and why are you the second speaker who says that this bill should have been introduced by the president, why not the government, why not the minister of defense, well, that's understandable, because in fact, our president is supreme commander-in-chief and chairman of the national security and defense council, and this bill covers security and defense itself, and is a matter of national security. that is, it is clear that in this case the president simply did not behave like a statesman who should have come out, he is an excellent communicator, at least he should start taking responsibility and explaining why it is necessary, as churcher once said, we are waiting for burning, tears and hard work, i.e. such, such should have been an unhappy conversation, in this case the government was involved, which yes, we have a zero rating, that is, it will not fall further. and now you

will see, this ball will be overturned, already today they sent a message to the servants of the people that it is all the military, that is, we do not comment, the military asked, we will decide, and the government, the government is actually those , who is not sorry, our government , instead of its main body in the system of executive authorities, i.e. essentially the main body in our confessional architecture of power , has turned into such an aphid goat without any... initiative and without any rights adoption or development of strategic decisions, i will repeat that it is also poorly executed from the point of view of the technique of drafting bills. i think that we will devote more than one broadcast to the law on mobilization, everything is just beginning, let me remind you that they plan to adopt it, or at least put it to a vote at the beginning of january, so we will talk about it, and we will continue to talk about the prisons, so that indeed the servants of the people received instructions not to comment today. this

bill. thank you very much, hennadiy druzenko, lawyer, public activist, co-founder and head of the first voluntary mobile hospital named after mykola perogov. we talked about whether the new bill on mobilization violates the constitutional rights of citizens. mr. druzenko says that yes, it violates. thank you very much. well, now about the dungeons, which gennady druzenko already mentioned. so, deputies from the servant of the people faction received recommendations on the necessity. to avoid comments on the bill on mobilization, ukrainian pravda reported this with reference to sources from the servant of the people faction. according to ukrainian pravda, the faction emphasized the need to follow the same line with the president due to the sensitivity of the issue, therefore mobilization in society, society should be communicated by the military, from whom this request actually comes. in the faction, emphasize that it is necessary to show discipline and refrain from comments until the military leadership.

will not start commenting on the provisions of the draft law and will not explain to society why exactly such norms are proposed and what they are motivated by, but of course this aspect caused a loud discussion in social networks, i'm here... i should add that i personally also tried to contact the deputies from the servant of the people several times today, some of them did not answer, some of them confirmed to me that the faction really had recommendations not to communicate the law on mobilization, until the military takes the word, well, then valery zaluzhnyi really went to the press conference, but in social networks, of course, this news caused heated discussions, and look in what way people are commenting on this topic. at the bank , they decided to comment on the law on mobilization is done by the military, not the ruling party, and this already sent a message to society, which sounded from the president at the press conference: it is not us who need your mobilization, it is they who need your mobilization, and the motive is quite clear, after the war you will still

want to re-elect us , so don't forget our kindness, petty and petty politics. i have already said 100 times, and i will repeat 100 more times, mobilization is a political issue, not a military one. if only because it is determined by law, and not by a command order, this issue is political, and to formulate it, it is up to politicians to communicate it and be responsible for it. in my ideal world , such complex topics as mobilization, demobilization during war, the supreme commander-in-chief and the commander-in-chief of the armed forces manage to communicate together, but in the real world, one does not understand the situation and his role, and the other is comfortable with the role of a helpless hostage, or all together taken, there were even suggestions that it should now come out in three, zelenskyi, engaged and died, and give a briefing together, well, this is probably in some ideal world, in general, how it should happen, look , we don't need to look for an ideal freedom, but we need to look at the current legislation, article 106

of the constitution of ukraine, the announcement of full or partial mobilization, issues related to mobilization, this is the area of ​​responsibility of the supreme commander-in-chief of the president of ukraine, therefore for the first time. it is the president's turn to come out and say that we are making a decision on an additional, non-additional new wave or a new mobilization procedure in general. the first moment. the second point, of course, people's deputies should communicate, since they first developed this draft law, and i will remind you that it was they who created the working group that worked on this draft law, and on many broadcasts where i crossed paths, including with people's deputies from the servant of the people , who worked in this group. or not from the servants of the people who worked in this group, they said that people's deputies were, well, key actors, they certainly agreed on some, well, points with the general staff, with the military, but they gave them proposals, and the military put their visa, suitable

, not suitable, or expressed, for example, some wishes, and secondly, it is the people 's deputies who will vote for this draft law, well, and the third point, it was signed by whom it came to the verkhovna rada, by the signature of the prem of the prime minister and under the signature of the minister of defense, therefore they should of course come out and give answers to all the key questions related to this draft law, how mobilization will be carried out, how they will work under the new rules, for example, military medical commissions, which today the commander-in-chief spoke about how in 20 or 30 days all citizens of ukraine will be able to come with documents to the territorial collection centers and agree on the data contained in these documents. there is, because now it is a big problem to get to these centers because of the queues and well, i would say yes , you know, quite limited work in the plan, well , there are certain days, reception hours and the like, how will it happen when hundreds of thousands go there , well, this is an open question, so i absolutely agree with all the posts

that you just made on the air, that it the issue is primarily political, and accordingly politicians must answer what is happening with this law in the country, the presence of such prisoners, for example, did not surprise me at all, this is an absolutely expected situation, because three weeks ago it was clear that this law , more precisely, all the minuses, not minuses, but negative consequences, there are social to a certain extent, they will try to hang this law exclusively on the military and say that they need this mobilization, not the country, not the politicians who brought the country, for example, there to whether of a different state, and by the way, politicians six months ago and a year ago promised coffee in yalta and many other things, this is not... what did they do, it was politicians, representatives of the president's office, individual people's deputies who made such statements, but now they they are trying to shift everything to the military and make them responsible. well, i will ask an amateur question, so why in the end volodymyr zelenskyi, he is a really excellent communicator, did not come out and explain why

there is such a need for mobilization and why it is needed? well, here is the obvious answer: he is a politician, he thinks about ratings , anyone who now says that such a mobilization... is necessary, well, he can forget to some extent about good ratings, that 's clear, he will hit the ratings, he will hit them seriously enough, the difference, what a difference , but he says that he, he is not interested in holding elections and in general , he seems not very interested in going for a second term? look, well, he's not interested in elections, or rather, he can't hold elections now, but he will hold them in the future, and you can always come out and say that look, i was on the alert for all citizens and protected everyone, and this military wanted to recruit more people to the army and what to use them for, today some people's deputies just stuck to their tradition, for example , they began to tell the phrase that the commander-in-chief said about human resources, that people are not a resource and so on, well, they don't understand. even, well, you know, such, well, the most banal, simplest things, more primitive, that there are certain terms that

are used in the official terminology, and there is nothing wrong with this concept, despite the fact that the commander-in-chief has said several times that people are important to us, and we will not cling to certain cities that russia is storming, if this will allow us to save people. so, in this context, politicians think about how it will turn out for them in the future. it doesn't matter if the elections will be held in six months or a year or a year and a half, but it will be remembered one way or another. because this will remain with citizens and it will most likely remain not in a very positive context, but by the way, by the way, not in a very positive context for whom, for politicians, after all they get the office of the president, the servants of the people, who today massively refused to comment on this topic, they get the opposite effect, or after all, they get what they were striving for, to knock this one off a little, so to speak, claims, if they will , look, i specifically looked at the comments under their statements to see if there are any. statement when they said they would not comment, they failed to translate the arrows, roughly speaking, they still

get what they deserve in this context, but they will hang on to this history to the end and will try to shift the responsibility to the military as much as possible, hoping that the citizens will have, for example, a short memory there, and then, when individual citizens will encounter, for example, the same territorial recruitment centers, they will start receiving summonses there and they will see... exclusively people in uniform, well , they, well, according to the politicians, they will not remember who adopted this law in general, who voted for it and whose names were displayed on the scoreboard when it happened voting directly in the session hall , that's the calculation, as far as i understand exactly this, that the further mobilization, it will kill this political effect and the politicians will be able to remove part of the responsibility from themselves, although it seems to me that their responsibility is precisely for all that is happening now... is the most for one simple reason: the military spoke more than a year ago about the need for changes regarding

rotation, mobilization and many other things, but then it was believed that it was possible to get by with other, let's say, measures, and this and this the decision was made at the political level, including the same president who said that we will not do any big mobilization there, we don't need it and so on, now that the situation has changed, well, for some it looks like a certain surprise, and more alone question, the current bill on mobilization provides for the active participation of local authorities in these processes, i can assume that mayors of large cities, and not only and even village heads, they probably, if we talk about political ratings, which you started talking about, probably not either very interested to be involved as much as possible in these processes, how can this cooperation take place here and to what extent will the local government become such a reliable ally of the central government in the mobilization processes? well, it is far from a fact that it will become... a reliable ally, we understand that in the field everyone knows each other, there are still certain moments here and there, well, you know, of a purely private

nature, on the other hand, it opens up a very large space for manipulation and abuse, and when, for example, in the draft law, i read the accompanying note, probably like you, and it was written there that no contains some corruption risks, well , it looks ridiculous and naive, in fact, these risks are there, starting from the military medical commissions, which can now start, i say tentatively, stamping. everyone there is healthy and absolutely able to serve there, and ending up with some decisions at the level of local authorities, so it was more correct, most likely, to put it on the law enforcement agencies, partly on the territorial recruitment centers, well, that is, to some extent, well expand their powers there and adjust better cooperation with employers, so that, in principle, employers can themselves submit some part of the documents about the people who work for them. and to say for whom they need armor, or for whom they don’t need armor, that would be a better story,

but with the local authorities, i’m afraid, there will be certain problems, or the local authorities will simply avoid, well, more active participation in these processes, and will either do it, well, not too actively, understanding that it will already hit them with some kind of political rating, well, that's why i don't, well, in principle, no i will be surprised if changes are made to the law already at the stage of its consideration and some such and such are not. significant points will simply disappear from it. the last question, if i may briefly, and if the draft law is a government one, why today , for example, together with zaluzhnym, rustem mayor, he is an official in... he does not need to think about ratings, or should he, too, did he not give a press conference today look, he is generally appointed according to whose quota, it seems, well, this is the authority of the president, and here they perfectly understand that it will simply beat, perhaps according to the rating of the president, and that is why he has not commented anything yet, but he will have to, because zaluzhnyi

will not come to the verkhovna rada and zaluzhnyi should not answer the questions of deputies, it is not his duty, and he may not do it. he even came out today, it was a very powerful, strong step, but he theoretically could not do it, because he is not the initiator of all this here, but in moderation, well, he will have to do it anyway, maybe he just hopes, that by then the situation will change a little, some possibly controversial norms will be removed, and him it will be somewhat easier to answer the questions that journalists and people's deputies will ask, as of today there are simply no such answers, answers that would satisfy those who think about their ratings. instead of thinking about the country, why do you think that zaluzhny will not be called to the verkhovna rada? look, they can call him, but he has every right not to come there, well, he is not the subject of the submission of the draft law, you see, he has it, he is already at the press conference today, that's right said that we do not have such powers, the fact that he and syrsky were written on the plaque is not true, the general staff

can only approve certain things if the deputies turn to them, the general staff did this... but not he is the author of this draft law, specific government officials and specific people's deputies are the authors of this draft law, and they must bear responsibility for it, therefore the verkhovna rada should be responsible for dying or dying. thank you very much, ihor reiterovych, political scientist, candidate of political sciences, i will just note that we, as radio liberty , appealed to the servant of the people faction and individual deputies many times today, we asked for comments, so far we have been refused, we hope that they will come tomorrow, thank you. that's all for us, we will certainly return to the topic of mobilization more than once, write your lines, comments, wishes in the chat under this broadcast, freedom live will return to the air tomorrow, there was an accident,

nina galamasyuk. your mother, mother, are there other relatives? no, but it seems that you have a grandfather, we are flying in the utsov carpathians, the wash basin is behind the house, and the toilet is downstairs? where is he, and if there are no cigarettes, then what will you smoke, he says, well, if there are no cigarettes, then he will smoke the rural council, how much time do you need, here you need 10 days, 10 days, this is what you

should do, i i didn't come here to look at the old farts who collect cones in the forest, what will be your vacation novel, vacation, vacation novels, i ask you to pray to god, i ask you to drink, and tomorrow i will fly to my sunny italy. mykola , don't spill blood on the wedding night, you don't have to, run there, run here,

let's go, where, there, give me a chair, congratulations. the sun shines. the wind blows, and russian propaganda lies. this has been the usual state of affairs for a long time. in 2023, russian propagandists lied as if they hit military targets when

they destroyed residential buildings in dnipro, kharkiv, kherson, uman or lviv. when odesa, kyiv, mykolaiv were shelled, when they killed visitors to cafes in kramatorsk and pokrovsk, when they killed and injured about 200 children in hospitals and homes throughout ukraine, or when they killed a third of the village at a memorial dinner in kharkiv. the russians said that they destroyed abrams and bradley za half a year before they even appeared in ukraine, for a whole year they were saying that poles were fighting instead of ukrainians, even among the propagandists some doubts began to creep in, because if all poles were fighting, then how could it happen that not a single one was killed , no prisoner , well, this is the usual level of russian delusion, which we don’t even pay attention to anymore, but there was such delusion, even against this background it was particularly impressive, and there were such frankly stupid situations in which the russian propagandists themselves got themselves into, and and how they are loved

name, here they too and their boss got there from time to time as well. so, for your attention, the 10 biggest falls of russian propaganda for the year according to the version of the espresso editorial office. russian propagandists like to talk about how to go west. now they will die from the cold, then they will die from hunger , then the whole of germany cannot live there, then britain, people are literally getting married there, but skabeeva surpassed everyone, she said that the british eat squirrels, they live in parks. great britain, there today it became known that in some restaurants will serve protein, due to the fact that there are many animals.

ukraine with weapons, such. our second point is putin, and putin is on it, this time, how he kept getting into some weird stories with diplomats. it first started when, he tried to congratulate the newly appointed ambassadors, so, well, in particular , the ambassador of great britain was also there, so he greeted them and, somehow, literally expected them to greet him as well...

all he wanted was for him they applauded somehow so and so, well, at least some applause, it did not succeed, at all, well, with some diplomatic putin was somehow not good with stories this year, he couldn't learn the name of his closest ally, the president. i will become kasym zhamar takayev, he calls him kemal, then zhamartovych, then sanzhat, well, in different ways, as it turns out, kasym

zhaman kyrynovych said that somewhere he has 27 billion, according to our statistics, 28.2 billion. well , actually, kasym zhamar-takayev reacted to this by simply starting to talk to putin in kazakh. the attempt of one of the dense propagandists of the kremlin, a man, gained great publicity simenyanyan, well, there is literally something

to threaten. kazakhs, brothers , look at ukraine, carefully, think seriously , and i think that our responsible persons also need to reassess and re-evaluate the relative level, because, my dear, the population of kazakhstan has increased dramatically, and it is not surprising that after all this it's somehow bad to treat russians, and now the russians tell us that the kazakhs, they were already born russophobes, just like the ukrainians, in principle, well...

and the next number of our program is actually such a major event in the bottom, when there putin constantly tried to prove , and they tried to prove to putin, that ukraine does not exist, and there was a wonderful story when the head of the constitutional court of the russian federation valery zorkin, in order to somehow help such a useful putin, brought him a map, saying, look, there is a map right there where on... there is no ukraine, we have a copy of the map in the constitutional court, uh, 17, 17th century, compiled under louis xiv, that is, it is the middle, even the beginning of the second half of the 16th century, compiled by the french, the french themselves, that he due, why did i bring egovych, it is not there

of ukraine

the next option is actually what was happening globally, this is the event, when ukrainian drones began to regularly visit russia, the propagandists , i must say, got very excited. the blow to the kremlin is a symbolic blow, it's something common, by the way, since september 11, 2001, because...