with the next non-release abroad of the former president of ukraine, the leader of european solidarity, petro poroshenko, well , it looks comical, but it is a problem for how ukrainian politics is observed in the rest of the world, where, as usual, communication with the leaders of various political forces - this is the norm of a democratic state, and that it is not the border guard who decides whether the leader of a political force can visit. there, let's say the same mike johnson, can't, and this is definitely not the issue that is within the competence of the chairman of the supreme the council of ukraine or its deputy, especially when they represent another political force, is a shame for democracy, it must be clearly said that a country that allows itself to behave like this during a war is risking its reputation, why should we risk our reputation, and again- still, i think that this year we were shown an example of a civilized one.

policy after the hamas attack on israel. ugh. what did prime minister benjamin netanyahu do? he immediately offered the leaders of the opposition forces to enter the military cabinet. although these not only did people not perceive him there, as , say, many representatives of the patriotic national-democratic forces did not perceive the populist forces that came to power as a result of the events of 2019 in ukraine. they fought for his resignation, took people out to demonstrations, came to his... his house, said not very nice things about his wife, remember, this is definitely something that president volodymyr zelenskyi did not experience, because the discussion with him is always was a discussion about the ratio of patriotic and economic, about professionalism and unprofessionalism, about whether a state that is facing the risk of a major war can even risk the creation of unprofessional leadership at almost all levels, now we have ...

the answer to this question, but the huge problem is that a large part of our countrymen of this answer will never be heard again, but these are completely different conversations, this is a political struggle, in israel it turned into individuals, ugh, nevertheless, it did not change anything, netanyahu offered to enter the cabinet of ministers of the opposition leader binny ganz, opposition leader tony lapido, tom lapido, it is interesting that... it is interesting that lapid did not join this government, his ratings began to fall, and ganz joined and his rating is now much higher than netanyahu's, but the project itself united was not too worried about it, as you can see, because at that moment he was worried about the survival of the country, its security, this is what i said in 2022, that it is necessary to... create a military cabinet, that it

is necessary that all political forces, which are represented by patriotic parties, have to enter this military cabinet or government of national unity, that it is necessary to delegate authority, that in a situation where a war has begun, the mandate of trust issued by a specific political force is nullified, because it is necessary to make only unpopular decisions and not think about elections, especially when a war is taking place such a long time, when there is already... the term has expired for the parliament and for the president, and they just continue to work because there is no possibility, and we will not have such a possibility to hold elections, the only answer to this the question is a government of national unity , and someone could ask me, what would happen if petro poroshenko in such a government had a higher rating than volodymyr zelensky, or not petro poroshenko, some conditional deputy from the party, had a voice from yaroslav yurchyshyn, it can be, it can be of course. well,

would the next president of ukraine be petro poroshenko or yaroslav yurchychyn? what does it matter? what difference does it make to us who will be the next president of ukraine after the war. why should we think about preserving the power of the current head of state or about the representatives of his entourage keeping their positions in the office, when it comes to whether this state will exist in general, because if ukraine does not exist, then it does not matter which of the mentioned persons will lead the ukrainian government. migration, will he even survive until the end of the war, because one or two successful missile attacks can lead to the complete defunding of the ukrainian political elite, because its representatives will die, this is also a war, and it is absolutely obvious to me that vladimir putin will do everything possible, in order to to destroy volodymyr zelenskyi, that is also clear, we are not talking about that, we are talking about the state, we should always think not about personnel, not about political forces, especially since they appear in us simply... in a few minutes, when

someone it is necessary, and they disappear just like that, of course, we perfectly understand that the party servant of the people will disappear, it will not be there in the next political term, let's say, and other political parties can also be reformatted and disappear, we perfectly understand that, what are we talking about in general we think, what is the significance of that the name that will be on the ballots after the end of the war, especially since you and i do not know at all in which year, in which decade the war will end, decade, not what year, so of course the government of national unity is the only possibility in order to squeeze it, it is not too late to create it, it is never too late to create it, the president has a wonderful opportunity. to turn to the leaders of political forces, whom he himself considers patriotic and capable of joint leadership of the state, and finally, to get out of the isolation in which is located, because in fact what we see when there is no such government, no such consultation, no meeting with the leaders

of political factions, is called very simply: political isolation, and a person in political isolation lives in a completely distorted reality and can make wrong decisions . and it is very dangerous, because the president must be strong, must be effective, must be realistic, and there must not be those texts that appeared this year, about the absolute loneliness, isolation of the president, why this loneliness, isolation happens because the president communicates exclusively with representatives of his closest circle, who are afraid to say some unpleasant things to him, so as not to lose their functions. besides, it's just management, if you surround yourself with close friends, they 're used to it, they want to keep you in the comfort zone, they're your friends, they don't want you to worry, you need to... lead yourself not with friends, with enemies, conditionally speaking, political, because these enemies will definitely tell you how benny the ghanaian talks absolutely tough to binyamin netanyahu even at press conferences, but benjamin netanyahu is a professional and experienced politician, he is forced to tolerate it, and what about some reservations regarding our

own not-so-old experience, during the presidency of viktor yushchenko, respectively , the coalition in the verkhovna rada, which collapsed and we received a prem prime minister, eventually viktor yanukovych, who... later became the president, but now we are not talking about a coalition, this is not a coalition, the servant of the people party has a majority in the parliament, it does not need any coalition, it needs a division responsibility, and such a majority in the servant of the people party will be until the next parliamentary elections, i say once again, we are a completely different story, the coalition fell apart in the parliament, some new political configurations could be created there, it was in a peaceful country in which the elections were held . etc., and now we are talking exclusively about responsibility, well, excuse me, but there is such a subconscious fear already now that if suddenly everyone starts pulling the blanket over themselves, we will lose time, we will continue to have discussions, but they will not decisions will not be born, isn't

it more profitable to have, you know, this turbo printer or whatever they called it, turbo mode, crazy printer, well, it doesn't work like that now, it doesn't work, that's all, because i'll repeat it again. turbo printers, turbo mode could work because only popular decisions were adopted that were supposed to increase the rating, this is called lumpenization of politics, and when you have to make unpopular decisions, your printer does not work, because each unpopular decision is minus 10% to of your rating, you you stick out at the bottom, and that's why you make these unpopular decisions that you have to make during the war, because there are no popular decisions during the war, you just... make them up to the moment when it's too late to make them, that's what we're talking about , and how to make sure that you are not afraid to share responsibility, well, it has always been the same, winston churchill took during the second world war, it seems to be the idol of volodymyr zelenskyi and boris johnson, boris joshanets wrote a book, i could tell him, a whole range of unpopular decisions ,

but like winston churchill became the prime minister of great britain because the conservatives, who had a majority in parliament, said, you know, if it started. war, we need a government of national unity, we invite you labor, you have no votes, to enter this government, but boryst said, we will enter, but please, your party leader, nevel chamberlain, who led to this situation, let him sit on deputies, he cannot be prime minister in the country of national unity, because he made mistakes, and then they asked, so what let us have this winston churchill, let him head the government. he means absolutely nothing to us, nothing to us, nothing to you, just a compromise figure, and that's how chertel became the prime minister of great britain, not because he was a great national leader, but because he was not accepted seriously by both political parties of the country, as a leader, well he

became one, but at the time when he was elected, he was not, but churchill shared his political responsibility with the labor leader clement mettle, who became his deputy, and that was the point that he could... not be afraid to make political decisions, first of all, because he didn't think about the ratings of the conservatives, he wasn't their leader, their leader was not great, well, for a long time, not a long time , but there was, ah... then, when chersey became conservative leader himself, he knew in any case that he shared this responsibility with clement attlee, and when he went abroad, clement tedav in his chair as leader of the government , while his party did not have a majority, but a parliamentary majority they held an election after the war, and attlee beat churchill in that election, because it turned out that for most britons, a wartime leader couldn't be a peacetime leader, it turned out, nobody even knew that. but it matters, it doesn't matter, i think it doesn't, the main thing is that great britain won, and churchill once

returned to office there, you can't return at all, there was just a monument, i think that the opportunity becoming a monument is much more important than the opportunity to become president again, that's all, and that's all it takes go out, and finally, let's go back to where we started, only we were summarizing the previous year, and we 'll talk a little bit about the outlook for the 23rd 24th 24th yes, thanks, purely theoretical, for now, if we get necessary stockpile of weapons in order to carry out what is planned, perhaps right now, almost at this very moment by our military leadership, if we, after all , see the results of the elections in the united states, and not only the presidential ones, by the way, and these results tell us that that is possible hope for a certain stability, as well as the durability of our... support from the united states, then whether the combination of all these conditions, perhaps, will force russia to reconsider its plans,

at least for the 25th year. i think that russia will think about its plans for 2025 after the presidential elections in the united states, that's once, after realizing how much of the ukrainian territory it controls by the middle of, let's say, november 24th , that's two , after she understands how destabilized the situation in ukraine is on november 24 of the year. just imagine that on the day when the results of the presidential election of the united states will be known, there will be a meeting of the security council in closed mode, and all these factors will be on the table: the territory, the number of mobilized on the russian front, from the russian side i have on the russian-ukrainian front , destabilization of ukraine, internal political, and from this they will proceed from what to do, that is, i do not think that they will... at all discuss the possibility of ending the war, i do not think that they are at all interested in this, but they can

discuss the possibility of transferring the war from an intensive to a non-intensive phase, and what political measures they can take for this, but again, taking into account the figure of the new american president, until this moment they will simply drag this situation, this is one version of the development of events, another version of the development of events , that they themselves... the americans will try to negotiate something with them, uh, but i don't think those arrangements will be pleasant for us, because again, imagine the arrangements between the united states and russia in 2024, in in any case, we perfectly understand that in 2024, 20% of the ukrainian territory cannot be freed from the russian invaders, there are no prerequisites for this, there may be an offensive, there may be some results of this offensive. this is true , because we have preserved 95% of the equipment that

was not supplied by the allies, we are not, we are not without weapons, but we need shells, this is not enough, let's see how it will be , we need military aid, aviation, we need aviation, it all has come so that we understand this situation, but you know, war - it's the kind of thing where it's very difficult to make predictions, i keep saying that when people always ask, ah... when will the war end, and that's not a topic for predictions right now, because then i should bring you a deck of cards tarot, sit down, you and i have spread out, you and i would have crazy ratings, and this forecast would be much more accurate than the forecast that you and i can give given the situation, because war is not a predictable thing, in war, as we know that some event that you definitely do not plan can change everything drastically, here i can give you examples this is the destruction of malaysian boeing by the russians in 2014, and buch in 2020

. these were events that changed the very attitude to war. ugh, from the civilized world. and the russians definitely did not plan, if not these events themselves, then their consequences. when there were all these atrocities in the butch, they did not think that they would be out of here so quickly. they will not be able to learn to clean all this and this and that and that, they were in a completely different world, and these are serious things, and on the other side there may be opposite events. character, which is also changed by the course of the war, for example, the liberation of kharkiv region, because if there was no liberation of kharkiv region, it would obviously lead to statements about the annexation of kharkiv region by the russians. ugh. and it would also be a different, let's say, political, non-military, but different political situation. so it is very difficult to predict here. it is clear that vladimir putin is ready to continue fighting, that we already understand that this is

a long-range war, that we must adapt to the war. for a long distance, do not tell people fairy tales, this is a very important thing, because there is a lot that happens with public sentiment is not because we did something wrong and so on, but because there were too many expectations, too many expectations are the biggest enemy of any war, war, the main thing is realism, when people say, oh, it's so good that we reassured, no, if you're reassured for a few weeks, and then everything that you, what you expect... when it doesn't happen, you inevitably get depressed, and if you're told that it's a difficult process, you reformat yourself to that difficult process , and then something better happens, then you perceive it on the contrary, a now many people perceive the situation in black tones precisely because he completely inadequately assessed the development of events, and this also needs to be said, and realism is a friend

of a normal healthy psyche, you know, when you go to bed with... you understand what can happen air alarm, then you calmly wake up, go to the bomb shelter or go to the corridor, or do nothing, but having prepared a place there in time, of course, and but you do not have a feeling of panic, and when you go to bed and think that nothing it can't be, and then u, then of course you are despair sinks in, and i think that people are realistic, they just remain with stronger nerves, because they are strong. nerves are the main key to survival in war, it's easier for us to talk about it, because we are engaged in journalism, journalism is generally work in a crisis, and we understand that we are more adaptive here with you, because we follow the news forever, and people started following them, most of us simply don't have a nervous system anymore, of course, but people

started following them, watching us, generally not even in the 14th year, but mostly on the 22nd, and i... perfectly understand what it means for a person who is not adapted to the influence of news to be in all this all the time, but i believe that if you accept the facts, keep them realistic and limit their number, you have much greater opportunities to survive this difficult era and be useful to the state in this difficult time than those. who lives either in pink or black glasses, just take off the glasses, in principle, in principle, in principle, look at the world, it is not easy, but it creates perspectives, well that, on this we will say goodbye, we will say goodbye , we will thank our defenders, thanks to whom we could conduct these broadcasts all this year,

we remind that we must help our armed forces in the next year as well. our armed forces remain the guarantor of our future with you, and this is the most important thing that needs to be said in these pre-new year days. thank you, khrystyna, i congratulate you on the holidays, very much to each other, vitaly portnikov and khrystyna yatski have been with you throughout the year and will be with you in the future. there is no medicine for men, they do not treat it with a look from the slob, i thought we were for

paper slips. there are all traces in the end, you don't wait for a vidkukhandzia, after that a mantsia, that's why there are some dances, zasetans. show me, it's all just dancing, well done, it's all just dancing, dancing, and

i soon lost it, i cried for a long time, because without my sweet, sweet morning, only there is a pity for my heart. it didn't matter, if i had a different fate, i would still love, my heart, but it wouldn't matter, if i beat, all the same, thank you, kay, thank you for your dances, thank you for your smiles, children, thank you for not take a breath, okay, friends, the next song

is called vyrulyu, and i think that it now has a completely different meaning, that you can sing it, thinking about our nation, we for... can always come out of any situation, ukrainians are brave, ukrainians are proud, ukrainians are beautiful, ukrainians are very cooperative, and there has never been a single situation when ukrainians did not get out of it first, so i will sing this song, i think now it has a completely different meaning, i think that victory is just around the corner, we let's all drive away.

want for money, leave it to yourself to insult the weaker one keep the other caramels for yourself. and i will be a sharp ear in the mouth, i am a princess of a dried pie, i am a fur coat tied to the end, but i promise to leave everything , i have to until the end, until the end, i will remove it without question, ask for the steering wheel, because there is no choice, you hear today i will drive away, together with those who...

vole to search, wide road, i will remember, i will drive away, piryl, piryl, i will remove all views, tobots, again promises equal to zero,

and safety, who is a fairy tale, there is no choice, you hear today i will drive away, together with those whom i love, roll, roll, roll , thank you, thank you, friends, next song , again, it doesn't work without people and it doesn't work without... your hands, you all have hands, give me here, give me here, and hello friends, this song will play while your

hands are... up and while you clap them, now let's start the song, we start the song with the beat, people set the beat, let's try it, dime, show me , see how it goes working. well, can you do a whole song like that? let's make the hands hurt, bravo, bravo, how the lover wiped her legs, that's all

it leads to the wrong place, i went to the anecten , you didn’t go there, everyone should have led you to the taboo, you are not there, so be your faithful angel , you have been led there, get it, what i love in myself, i love, sir, and i could do everything , i love you, magic is warmer for you, truth is stronger, because everyone is together, you don't need it.

i was looking for a couple for a flower and lived without water, i screamed the song is bloody, it will lead me to the wrong place, tomorrow is the boomerang sister, it will fly to the wrong place, as happens your faithful angel, take me there, get everything that i love in myself, give the ocean to the ship , fall, and i catch on my naked body all. i love you, the magic of your love, the truth of the day, don't need it, daddy's kiss will be distorted, don't need it, that one won't be enough, don't need that one, sweetie loved someone else, don't need it, we are girls, boys.

don't have to like that, but love won't be enough , don't have to like that, sweetie fell in love with someone else, don't have to like that, we're a girl for a bigger party, don't have to like that.

people, you are beautiful, you are incredible, simply. let's sing our, your most favorite song. are you all ready? the words were learned. ok, i want to hear from everyone today, everyone in this beautiful subway of independence square. and everyone who watches this concert. let 's try to sing together. you didn't cry. ready to sing?