is perfect for one simple reason: i'm not the president of the united states, unfortunately, if i were the president, i imagine myself sitting in the oval office and having to make a decision that could cost my own country wars, i don't know , no matter what i do, it's easy to say such things when you don't have such responsibility, but when you do, when a nuclear suitcase is standing next to you, you behave differently, you understand, you start to perceive and weigh all these... completely differently , and therefore, therefore, i think that the search these mechanisms will continue, that's all , you see, i understand, let's talk a little about what might be worth doing internally, or what will happen in view of what has already been done and not done in 2023, there are some key moments in our internal

decisions that you would have marked for yourself at the end of the 23rd, and maybe they can gain some traction, i don’t know, the struggle with the russian orthodox church, that is , the agents of the russian federation under the guise of religious organizations, maybe it is some individual moments in the information policy, what was most important to you, were we focused purely on the military component and the international field'. that they forgot to work on such internal stability and at least some kind of comfort of our people's existence. you know, i was puzzled by all these conversations about some problems between the political and military leadership of ukraine. i believe that the very fact of the appearance of such conversations is wrong. ugh. from the point of view that if there really are any differences, they must be internal conflicts, let's say so. which should not

be made public and definitely should not be made public in social networks by deputies from the ruling party and definitely the statements of deputies from the laundry should be refuted by representatives of the political leadership, but all this did not happen, but we said many times, come to think of it, mp maryana bezugala is speaking there with demands for the resignation of the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine, this is her position, i also believe that her position, i never understood those who said that she has no right to she should speak, she is a deputy. of the verkhovna rada, he says what he wants, but if she is a deputy from the servant of the people party, which is the ruling party that has the majority, then it is obvious that this party or parliamentary faction must express itself, uh, say, you know, this is the personal position of ms. maryano bezoglo and our political force do not consider it necessary to raise the question of the resignation of the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine at all, this is the competence of the president of ukraine, and this is the end of these conversations, but this did not happen, true, why? representatives of

the president's office said: but this is her private opinion. umerov, umerov, the minister of defense came out and said: "no, we do not have such intentions. well, when umerov said this, the conflict was practically resolved, but by and large, many expected a statement from the president of ukraine himself? yes, it was not sounded. and i can name many such moments. this is the story of yet another non-release abroad of the former president of ukraine, a leader." solidarity of petro poroshenko, well, it looks comical, but it is a problem for how ukrainian politics is observed in another world, where it is customary that communication with the leaders of various political forces is the norm of a democratic state, and that it is not the border guard who decides whether the leader of a political force can visit there, let's say the same mike johnson or not. and this is definitely not an issue that is within the... competence of the chairman

of the verkhovna rada of ukraine or his deputy, especially when they represent another political force, this is a shame for democracy, it must be clearly said that a country that allows itself to to behave in wartime risks reputation, why should we risk reputation, and again, i think we've been shown an example of civilized professional politics this year after the hamas attack on israel, ugh, what the prime minister did. binyamin netanyahu , he immediately invited the leaders of the opposition forces to enter the military cabinet, although these people not only did not accept him there, as , say, many representatives of the patriotic national-democratic forces did not accept the populist forces that came to authorities as a result of the events of 2019 in ukraine, they fought for his resignation, took people to demonstrations, came to his house, said not very nice things about his... wife, remember, this is exactly

what president volodymyr zelenskyi did not experience , because the discussion with him was always a discussion about the ratio of patriotic and economic, about... professionalism and non-professionalism, about whether a state that is facing the risk of a major war can even risk the creation of an unprofessional leadership at almost all levels, now we know the answer to this question, but the huge problem is that a large part of our compatriots will never hear this answer again, but this is a completely different conversation, this is a political struggle, in israel it turned into personalities, ugh, that's not anyway, it didn't change anything, tanya. offered to enter the cabinet of the opposition leader bieni ganz, the opposition leader tony lapido, tom lapido, it is interesting that jeira lapido, i'm sorry, it is interesting that lapid did not join this government, his ratings began to fall, and

gantz joined and his rating is now much higher than netanyahu's, but the united project itself, but netanyahu was not very excited about it, as you can see, because... at that time he was worried about the survival of the country, its security, that's what i was saying in 2022 , that a military cabinet should be created , that all political forces represented by patriotic parties should be included in this military cabinet or a government of national unity, that powers should be delegated, that in a situation where war broke out, the mandate trust... given to specific political forces is zeroed out, because it is necessary to make only unpopular decisions and not think about elections, especially when the war has been going on for such a long time, when the term has already expired for the parliament and for the president, and they just continue to work , because there is no possibility, and we

will not have such a possibility, to hold elections. the only answer to this question is the government of national unity, and someone could ask me, what would happen if petro poroshenko in such a... government would have a higher rating than volodymyr zelenskyi, or not petro poroshenko, some conditional deputy from the party, a vote from yaroslav yurchyshyn, it could be, it could be, of course, well, then the next president of ukraine would be petro poroshenko or yaroslav yurchychyn, what does it matter, what does it matter to us the difference, who will be the next president of ukraine after the war, why should we think about preserving the power of the current head of state or about the representatives of his... entourage keeping their positions in the office, when it comes to whether this state will exist at all, after all, if there is no ukraine, then it does not matter which of these persons will lead the ukrainian government in exile, or whether he will even survive until the end of the war, because one or two successful missile attacks can lead to

the replenishment of the ukrainian political elite, because its representatives will die , this is also a war, and it is absolutely obvious to me that vladimir putin will do everything possible to destroy volodymyr zelenskyi, that is also clear. we are not talking about that, but about the state, we should always think not about personnel, not about political forces, especially since they are in us appear in just a few minutes, when someone needs it, and disappear just like that , of course, we perfectly understand that the servant of the people party will disappear, it will not be in the next political term, let's say, and other political parties can also reformat and disappear, we understand it perfectly, what are we even thinking about? what is the significance of the name that will be on the ballots after the end of the war. especially since you and i do not know at all in which year, in which decade the war will end, decade, not that year therefore, of course, the government of national unity is the only possibility for

survival. is it too late to create one? it's never too late to create one. the president has an excellent opportunity to appeal to the leaders of the political forces that he himself considers patriotic and capable of ... joint leadership of the state and eventually get out of the isolation that he is in, because in reality what we see is when there is no such government , there are no such consultations, there is no meeting with the leaders of political factions, it is called very simply: political isolation, and a person in political isolation lives in a completely distorted reality and can approve wrong decisions, and this is very dangerous, because the president must be strong, must be effective, must be realistic. and there should not be those texts that appeared this year about the absolute loneliness and isolation of the president. why this loneliness isolation happens? because the president communicates exclusively with representatives of his closest circle, who are afraid to say some unpleasant things to him, so as not to lose their functions. besides, this is just management,

if you surround yourself with close friends, they are used to wanting to keep you in the comfort zone, they are your friends, they do not want you to worry, you need to lead yourself not with friends, but with enemies, relatively speaking, political, because these enemies... i must say how benny gantz speaks absolutely harshly to benjamin netanyahu even at press conferences, but benjamin netanyahu is a professional, experienced politician, he is forced to tolerate it, but what about some reservations? in relation to our own no such a long experience, during the presidency of viktor yushchenko, respectively, the coalition in the verkhovna rada, which fell apart and we finally got viktor yanukovych as prime minister, who later became the president, but now we are not talking about a coalition, it is not a coalition, a party the servant of the people has a majority in the parliament, it does not need any coalition, it needs a division of responsibility, and such a majority in the servant of the people party will be until the next parliamentary elections, i say again, we are... it is a completely different story altogether, the coalition fell apart in the parliament,

some new political configurations could be created there, it was in a peaceful country, in which elections were held, etc., and now we are talking exclusively about responsibility, well, excuse me, but there is such a subconscious fear already now that what if everyone will start to pull the blanket over himself, we will lose time, we will continue to have discussions, but there will be no solutions or will they be born? it is not more profitable to have, you know, this turbo printer, or as they called it, turbo mode, it is now it doesn't work like that, it doesn't work, that's all, because once again, i repeat, turbo printers, turbo mode could work, because only popular decisions were made that were supposed to increase the rating, this is called lupenization of politics, and when you have to make unpopular decisions, your printer doesn't work, because every one doesn't... to your rating, you stick out at the bottom, and that's why you make these unpopular decisions that

you have to make during the war, because there are no popular decisions during the war, you just make them you postpone them until the moment when they are no longer on time to accept, that's what we're talking about, and how to make sure that you are not afraid to share responsibility, well, it was always the same, winston churchill accepted during the second world war, he seems to be the idol of volodymyr zelenskyi and boris johnson, boris johnson even wrote a book to tell him. a whole range of unpopular decisions, but how did winston churchill become prime minister of great britain because the conservatives, who had a majority in parliament, said: you know, if there's a war, we need a government of national unity, we invite you labour, you don't have the votes to enter this government, and labor said, we will enter, but please, here is your party leader, neville chamberlain, who led to this situation, let him sit on the bench, he cannot be. a minister in the government of national unity, because he made a lot of mistakes, and then they asked

who, let's give this winston churchill, let him lead the government, he means absolutely nothing special to us, to us, to you, he means nothing special, just a compromising figure, and that's how chertel became the prime minister of great britain, not because that he was a great national leader, because he was not taken seriously by both political parties of the country as a leader, well, he became one. but at the time when he was elected , he was not, but churchill shared his political responsibility with the labor leader kliment mettle, who became his deputy, and this was the essence that he could not be afraid to make political decisions, firstly, because that he did not think about the rating of the conservatives, he was not their leader, their leader was little, well, for a long time, not a long time, but he was, well, and then when cherzi himself became a conservative leader, he knew in any case that he shared this responsibility with clement attlee, and when he went abroad, clement attlee sat in

his chair, the leader, the government, while his party didn't have a majority, and they held a general election after the war, and in that election attlee beat churchill, because it turned out that for most british people a wartime leader couldn't be a peacetime leader, so it turned out, nobody even knew that, but it matters, it doesn't, it seems to me that no, the main thing is that great britain won, yes. and churchill once returned to office there, he might not have returned at all, there was simply already a monument, i think that the opportunity to become a monument is much more important than the opportunity to become president again, that's all, and that's it to go out, and finally, let's go back to where we started, only we were summing up the previous year, and we will talk a little about the prospects for the 23rd, not the 24th, the 24th, thank you, purely theoretical for now, if we will get necessary... a stockpile of weapons to carry out what is planned, perhaps right now, almost right now by our military

leadership, if we eventually see the results of the united states election, and not just the presidential election, by the way, and these results tell us about the fact that we can hope for a certain stability, as well as the durability of our support from the united states, then will the combination of all these conditions, perhaps ... about russia, make them reconsider their plans, at least for the 25th year? i think that russia will think about its plans for 2025 after the presidential election in the united states, this time, after realizing. what part of the ukrainian territory does it control in the middle, let's say on november 24th, it is two, after it understands how destabilized the situation in ukraine is on november 24th, it is three, just imagine that on the day, when the results of the presidential election of the united states will be known, there will be a meeting of the security council in closed mode, and all these factors will be

on the table: the territory, the number of russians mobilized on the russian front. i'm on the side the russian-ukrainian front , the destabilization of ukraine, internal politics, and from this they will proceed from what to do, that is, i do not think that they will discuss the possibility of ending the war at all, i do not think that they are interested in it at all, but they can discuss the possibility transition of the war from an intensive to a non-intensive phase, and what political measures they can take for this, but... again, taking into account the figure of the new american president, until this moment they will simply drag this situation, this is one option for the development of events, another option for the development of events is that the americans themselves will try to agree on something with them, huh, but i do not think that these agreements will be pleasant for us, because again, imagine the agreements between

the united states and russia in 2024, in any - in any case we understand very well with you that in 2024 20% of the ukrainian territory cannot be freed from the russian occupiers, there is no premeditation for this, there may be an offensive, there may be some results of this offensive, this is true, because we have preserved 95% of the equipment, which to us supplied by the allies, we are not without weapons, but we need shells, this is not enough, let's see how it will be, we need military help. aviation is needed, all this has to come so that we understand this situation, but you know, war is such a thing that it is very difficult to make predictions, i keep saying that when people always ask, when will the war end, and what is everything is not a topic now for predictions, because then i would have to bring you a deck of tarot cards, sit down, you and i spread out,

you and i would have crazy ratings, and this prediction would be much more accurate than the forecast that you and i can give given the situation, because war is not... in war, as we know, some event that you definitely do not plan for can change everything drastically, here i can to give examples, this is the destruction of the malaysian boeing by the russians in 2014, as well as buch in 2020. second, these were events that changed the very attitude to war. ugh from the side of the civilized world, and the russians definitely did not plan, if not these events themselves, then their consequences, when there were all these atrocities in buch, they did not think that they will leave here so quickly that they will not be able to clean it all up, clean up and so on and so forth, they were in a completely different world, and these are serious things, and on the other

hand , there may be events of the opposite nature, which also change the course of the war , let's say, the liberation of kharkiv oblast. because if there was no liberation of kharkiv region, it would obviously lead to statements about the annexation of kharkiv region by the russians, and it would also be a different, let's say, political, not military, but different political situation, so it is very difficult to predict here, clearly just different that vladimir putin is ready to continue fighting, that we already understand that this is a long -range war, that we have to adapt to a long-range war, not to tell people fairy tales, this is a very important thing, because a lot of ... what is happening with attitudes society is not because we did something wrong and so on, but because expectations were raised, expectations are raised is the biggest enemy of any war, the main thing in war is realism, when people say, oh, it's so good, we were reassured , not if you were sedated a few weeks, and then everything that you

expected didn't happen, you inevitably get depressed, and if you're told that it's a difficult... process, you reformat yourself to that difficult process, and then something better happens, then you, on the contrary, perceive it, and now many people perceive the situation in black tones, precisely because he completely inadequately assessed the development of events, and this also needs to be said, and realism is a friend of a normal healthy psyche, you know, when you go to bed and you understand what can happen air alarm, then you calmly wake up and... go to the bomb shelter or go to the corridor, or do nothing, but having prepared a place there in advance, of course, and but you do not have a feeling of panic, and when you go to bed and you think that nothing can happen, and then once in... then of course you heard a sinking feeling, and i just think that people are realistic, they just stay with stronger nerves, because

strong nerves are the main guarantee of survival in war, it is easier for us to talk about it because we we are engaged in journalism, journalism is generally work in a crisis, and we understand that we are more adaptive here with you, because we follow the news forever, and people began to follow... and people began to follow them, just as they are watching us, in general, not even in the 14th year, but mostly in the 22nd, and i perfectly understand what it means for a person who is not adaptive to the influence of the news to be in all this all the time, but i believe that if you perceive the facts, follow their realism. and limit their number, you have a lot more opportunities to survive this difficult era and be useful to the state in this difficult world

than those who live in either pink or black glasses, just take off the glasses, in principle, in principle, in principle, look at the world, it is not easy, but it creates prospects, so what, we will say goodbye, say goodbye, thank our defenders. thanks to whom we were able to conduct these broadcasts all this year, we remind you that we must help our armed forces in the next year as well, our armed forces remain under the guaranty of our you of the future, and this is the most important thing to say in these new year's days. thank you, khrystyna, i congratulate you on the holidays, very mutual, vitaly portnikov and khrystyna yatsky have been with you throughout the year and will be with you in the future.

the village of borodyanka is a living testimony of the crimes of the russian federation, like this monument to taras shevchenko, it is all covered with scars. this is the main street of the village, the central one. in 2022 , at the beginning of march, the russians continuously dropped aerial bombs on it for two days in a row. what about your apartment now? fully burned, completely. managed to save nothing, nothing, in general, when we went up as firefighters and police, there was nothing there, not a single thing that we could save, not a single one. lyudmila ivanivna lived in one of the high-rise buildings on the central street. this is what her apartment looks like today. my father, for example, the biggest thing he regrets is that he has a photo, he is already 80 years old, that the photos were burned, where my late

mother was in his youth, where he was in his youth, almost fifty civilians died under the rubble of buildings, the russians did not allow us to dismantle the rubble and put out the fires when the rashists were already here, and we asked, the man said, it is possible, there might still be some people to save themselves. take the boys, they said 50 m from your house we will shoot and that's it. and these are the remains of mrs. lily's house. while the authorities, together with donors, are looking for opportunities to rebuild it, the woman lives in a modular town. the rooms themselves were fully equipped. now i have everything done in my own way. i love mine. come in each room was equipped with such glasses. you were bunk beds. about three hundred people live in this town, they arranged temporary housing as best they could, ms.

lilya shares. it was our girl's birthday, we celebrated. well, here the children are playing, you see, a little. the woman does not complain about the conditions in the modular town and cannot wait to be able to live as before. you can live here, i can’t say that it’s bad here, but it’s not home, i understand you, but what do they tell you, what are they promising, what about housing, oh, i know that the tender was passed, i know that it is written that from february our house will start from, well the reconstruction of our house will begin, mrs. lily, like thousands of other residents of boryandka will have to suffer, new housing is promised, but not soon, today design works are being carried out to replace the destroyed houses, in the first days of the invasion, more were damaged... 900

houses, 400 two, 402 the buildings are completely subject to demolition, that is, they will be dismantled, and 406 will be subjected to major repairs, and this building was christened the arch of friendship of peoples, so that everyone would remember what the brotherly love of russians looks like, today it is being demolished, it is being attacked they dropped... an aerial bomb, killing three people, six apartment buildings have already been completely demolished, one apartment building is still under demolition, and two more apartment buildings will be partially dismantled. efforts are underway to rebuild a significant part of infrastructure facilities.

european donors, others - at the expense of the central government. 97 objects in the kyiv region are being rebuilt with funds from the fund for liquidation of the consequences of armed aggression. this is vokzalna street in the city of bucha. she is one of the most famous. and here's why. this photo went viral the whole world. it was made exactly on this street. one of the first completely destroyed columns of the russian army. payback for resistance. the invaders executed civilians and destroyed their homes, like this building. this is a floor where a projectile hit between the second and third floors and caused significant damage, so we had to do a complete dismantling, and now we are engaged in restoration. now in bucha , the buildings look

as new as they did two years ago. many local residents rebuilt their homes on their own, others waited for state assistance. they restored everything, installed windows, everything, the balconies are glazed, everything is so good, only that, of course, look at all this, we remember. the situation with reconstruction in irpen is worse. the occupiers destroyed 3/4 of all infrastructure facilities in the city. the damage was estimated at 750 million dollars. this area of ​​the city was probably the most affected by russian aggression, residential complexes here were shot with hail and aerial bombs. estimates for reconstruction were approved only in 2023. two years ago , there were high-rise buildings here, now it is a continuous field. banksy graffiti is all that remains of the phosphorus-burned high-rise. and those

at times, the country's authorities have made buchansky district a living proof of russian atrocities, foreign delegations are constantly brought here to open the world's eyes to the true face of the russian federation. we are here to hear the ukrainian people, and then return to indonesia and tell our society what happened here. because russian... kanta is powerful, even in the indonesian media, so we will make an effort to show at home what is really happening here and how we can help. artem logutenko, oleksiy kutsuk, espresso tv channel. see this week in collaborators program. sellers from the resort village of lazurne. but as locals are forced

to get. watch the collaborators program with olena kononenko on the espresso tv channel on tuesday, january 2. we are starting the information day on the espresso tv channel, the news is on the air, khrystyna parubiy works in the studio. 87 enemy shahed fighters were shot down by the ukrainian air force on new year's eve. in total, the russians released 90 kamikaze drones. the air alert sounded in 10 regions. most of the drones were eliminated in the southern regions. according to the spokeswoman of the forces of the defense of the south nataliya humenyuk, the air defense forces worked

almost alone.