sukhadol to one of the nato countries , the baltic countries in particular, well, as far as i know, then it was more about estonia, and only the situation with weakness in ukraine, in crimea, control was lost for a while of the central government yanukovych then coincided, just, well if it pushed russia to act on the territory of ukraine, therefore they understand very well that even if they do not end aggressively... russia's war against ukraine can be a territory of invasion, that is, it is obvious, and therefore they consider the war in a completely different way than it is considered, say in spain, italy, which are further away, and as to whether it will be heard in these capitals, the capitals of nato, it already depends on the work of our partners, the baltic countries, who help us very seriously.

you know that lithuania was actually the first country, i don't know, i think i'm not wrong , that provided ukraine with, well, let's say lethal weapons, yes, the second was the united states of america with javelin anti-tank weapons, but lithuania then started this process and provided us guns, which were actually lethal weapons, so lithuania, latvia, estonia, if you look at their expenses, according to the gross domestic product, they are in... the first part of the list of partner countries, yes, it is small in terms of the population of the country, but their position is very important for us as important as the eu and nato countries. mr. valery, but you are talking about the fact that russia was ready to attack estonia, now they are talking about a possible attack on lithuania or latvia there, and remember, just six months ago there were talks about this suval corridor, which is between lithuania and belarus, this corridor, which... there is not enough russia

to break that road to the city of kaliningrad, the former kenniksberg, but these countries, i mean the baltic countries, they are members of the north atlantic alliance, if i'm not mistaken, in 2004, and that's it it means that a russian war with nato is inevitable, and i will tell you this, first of all, regarding the attack on estonia, this is... not my information, this is nato information, i will not say all the sources, but i know for sure, where was this intelligence, and with me, well, it was shared at the time, it was not like that closed, because the same plans as before the large-scale invasion of russia in ukraine, as it is called, merged there in the media, the same way it was then, even with specific plans there, how it can develop, that is, we can do conclusions that one of the... scenarios in russia in terms of military

was, now the situation, to what extent it will change in terms of russia's intentions to attack nato, maybe because of these countries specifically? i can't tell you, i've said it more than once, and this is my opinion, maybe it's subjective, that putin very much wants to do this in order to show nato the inability to react quickly. nato is just now changing its strategy of deterrence to a strategy of prevention, what does this mean? previously, they had such and such an approach: if they attack, for example, one of the baltic countries, then for 48 hours this country will introduce self-defense, and then, well, there 42 hours, 48 ​​hours, 72 hours, then for two weeks other nato countries will step up. first the rapid reaction forces. and then the nato countries are already

discussing, but now lithuania, latvia, estonia raised the question of rub. see what was in ukraine. look, when belarus went from russia to kyiv, bucha, gostomel, irpen, varodyanka, moschun, look what happened, and this is actually the distance to their capitals, and that's why they asked the question, no, we don't want that, we countries who want your contingents to be located already, and then... germany made a decision about the location of the german brigade on the territory of lithuania, the only problem is that it is only 2027, that is , they want it to be earlier, because they absolutely think , it is absolutely correct that russia aggressive can do it earlier, when nato will not be prepared militarily, and here we have to talk about what to do in these years, 24, 25, 26, i.e.... it

can really be our allies in such, in such preparation, and suvalskyi, this one, exactly 100 km, these corridors that russia would have wanted for a long time. to break through between belarus, which is actually more and more under russian control and its own enclave of kaliningrad, well, conditionally, because, to be honest, kaliningrad was not russian, this is the consequence of the redistribution of the second of the world, by the way, the head of russia always talks about all this historical belonging, and why does he not say that keniksberg should be given back, this is a simple question, why... people think uncritically and even listen to all this nonsense, even in ukraine, so give it back koneksberg, give this enclave that is not yours to those who do not want to live, in principle, in russia, they want to live with the european union and nato, so this same territory will not go anywhere, and this is a provocation, as long as putin,

as long as this regime is in the hands of the authorities, they want they are itching to try, and it is only a matter of time and the strength of these countries and nato. therefore, in principle, this probability will change, but it remains absolutely quite real, i just think that most likely they can really attack, well, this is my opinion again, it is not supported by operational plans there, they had the estonian plan, they have it, and the entry of finland into nato and the strengthening of this district indicates that estonia can come under attack, be under attack, because there is narva, there is... russian eyes are all moods, and agents, very, very serious agents , sent there, not even from the time of the soviet union, but sent already in the last decades, this is what i am saying, there are a lot of russian intelligence agents there, under , they are sent there under various guises, they,

let estonians, they know it, let them clean it up, because in ukraine this agency still, unfortunately, leads to huge problems of our country. we have already talked about the nato countries and the baltic countries, but there is one more country that is not yet in nato, which is on the threshold nato is sweden. so the swedes got information that they are sending 800 soldiers to the borders of russia and latvia to deter russia from attacking, and this, well, the swedes haven't fought with the russians for a long time, since the 19th century, if i'm not mistaken, with karl. third, it was a related war, that is, the swedes also understand that they can also be under attack, because everyone remembers the story with finland in the year 39, and in principle, just a few days ago, i watched a documentary about the way the soviet

union was preparing for war with finland, and there there is a lot of similarity with the way the russian federation is behaving now, that is, how the soviet union behaved on the eve of the... return to finland and now this whole story, well, it literally overlaps with this story, which vladimir putin is now trying to copy, well to volodymyr putin , mr. valery, are you ready to start some sort of subjugation war now, well, if it is not the baltic countries, then sweden, because it is not yet in nato, and it is not clear whether sweden is actually already under... under the north program - the atlantic alliance, and it will be the same as an attack on a country of the north atlantic alliance. a few important questions, first of all, is there a will, of course, and threats are coming and going, but that's it, the main reason, two reasons, this is the first,

it's that ukraine is pulling on itself, very serious russian forces , they simply have nothing to offer there, that's the first thing. and secondly, sweden combined with finland with nato forces, this is a completely different story for russia. the swedes calculated it pragmatically, and this is a huge, well, example for us, a neutral country that, like finland was looking for some kind of solution, coexistence in the conditions between nato and the russian bloc, well, rather russia, than the entire bloc that they formally have. but sweden immediately made a decision, immediately, it is necessary to unite. i will tell you more, sweden is already preparing to sign documents on the location of nato bases, in particular the us, on its territory. that's it, the train has left. that is, there will be reinforcements there very quickly, and russia can forget about its

domination in the north. it is so strategically arranged there that the union of finland, sweden, of nato countries completely, hits on russian intentions. to control the direction to the arctic , that is precisely in this direction, they will strategically now cover a lot of things for them, sweden is strong in weapons, a strong army, it is in terms of numbers, of course we are... less, but for these tasks, which are today to prevent russian aggression towards sweden, as a member of nato, it's just wonderful that they put up this security umbrella for their country. therefore, i think that sweden will not stop it any more , turkey will haggle a little there, and the decision will be made finally, well rather all, i don't know, until the washington summit in the summer of this year. in the usa, i think it is quite possible, that is, no matter

what happens there, you ask whether nato will go to war if there is an attack on sweden, i will say my opinion, even p' will not play a role here the second article, it is not nato that will enter the war, nato countries will enter the war, that is, they will definitely enter the war, those who will be threatened from the northern flank will definitely do it, and i have no doubt about it and... the usa will consider it depending on the political situation , and nato, well, nato now you know, unfortunately, such an organization, it is still just beginning to understand what serious threats are in europe, maybe it will mature by then, that is, they will stand up for sweden, that's 100%. former united states ambassador to the united nations and republican presidential candidate nikki haley has said that ukraine's victory over russia is critical to preventing a wider war because the next step... would be to invade nato countries, which would inevitably require participation american troops. let's hear what nicky haley had to say. russia

will not be limited to an attack on ukraine. poland and the baltic countries are next, and these are already nato countries, and this is what will draw the united states of america into the war. therefore, helping ukraine is not about inciting a war, but about preventing an even bigger war. it is against this background, mr. valery. there is another piece of information, i think you have read it and you know about the publication in politics, where referring to the words of the european commissioner terry breton, who allegedly overheard the conversation of the former american leader trump with ursula fonderen in 2020, that america will not come to aid to europe if it was attacked, and trump said that... nato is dead and the united states of america will leave the alliance, and reproached germany for not

paying an additional $400 billion to the bloc's budget. now is a year, a pre-election year, an important year in the united states of america, it is not for nothing that politico cites this story with trump and makes it clear that politics, well, let's say, the foreign policy of the united states of america can undergo corrections or until... the united states of america has enough safeguards in the country for so that even after the arrival of trump, the positions of official washington regarding ukraine remained unchanged. the first question, donald trump's position on nato, his personal vision, what the united states should know is his personal vision. now we do not know the results of the american elections. that is, donald trump has a chance, but what are the chances, how much is the election

and it is difficult to predict. now the second question is whether there is such support for withdrawal from nato in broad american circles there, even the republican party, there is no such support today, and whether donald trump can if he becomes a candidate and then the president, well, let's imagine if he can initiate it, i'll even say, he can't, he will initiate it. but the first fuse is in the law on the budget, it’s called nda 2024, they introduced a clause that the president cannot single-handedly make a decision to withdraw from nato, which is interesting, it doesn’t even mention any international organization, namely withdrawal from nato, well that is, in this law, well , probably because it is about the military budget of the united states, including the funds allocated for... nato, well, america's participation in nato, they probably put it there. therefore, there is a fuse

, it will not be easy for him, anyone who wants to do it as president, and there will be a big, serious struggle. unfortunately, this fuse was put, for example, in the land list for ukraine, item 1224 was removed, which i consider to be erroneous. ah... but it just shows the actual, well , real moments, because in principle , there are also risks regarding the amount of weapons for ukraine. great in the case there are not only elections, even focusing attention in the fall of america on internal problems, that is why we are talking about more about today's package, about the fact that funds are needed now, concrete help is needed now, without dragging it somewhere far, because right now is the concentration of efforts, nicky haley says about this, that right

now we need to help ukraine , so that there are no bigger problems. i will say more that the discourse of the united states is not being conducted. what we started talking about, i hope they will hear: not providing sufficient military and other, financial, economic, humanitarian aid to ukraine now, may give the illusion to putin that even during such a uh, if dynamic, intense, but such a fixed somewhere along the front line of the war, even during this he can allocate resources to attack a nato country, for provocation, i don't know. or for an attack , of course, there will be no opportunity, because ukraine is taking this blow upon itself, and there will be for provocation, so they think completely wrongly, he has a completely different vision, as soon as this opportunity is so small, it will be to show that in there is no unity in nato, that not all countries will immediately apply the fifth article, he will do it, and that's why

i am surprised by the position of the leader of the house of representatives, john. who listens only to trump 's advice, and does not listen to the advice of his people, the americans, the republicans, who are mostly in favor of supporting ukraine with weapons, that is , the whole game is political, and i emphasize that we need the maximum concentration of long-range missiles, planes, several f16 squadrons, all weapons now for these six months, then we can say that we will in many ways protect nato from an attack, if they do not... give weapons, it is not that ukraine will surrender, ukraine will not surrender, we will continue deter the aggressor, but we will not be able to inflict the same kind of blows on him as before, so that he cannot provoke nato. they are making a big mistake now in washington, underestimating russia's ability to attack nato countries. border crossings have already taken place,

missile attacks, crossings by airplanes. the nazis are trying to hide it all. well, you know, an awl in a bag is such a story, you can hide it, but a missile that flies into your territory, you later say: i can’t find it on the radar, are you looking for it somewhere in the forest, but the truth is that you just missed this missile strike, that's all, but the truth is that you are not ready to respond to russia's attacks, we in ukraine feel it ourselves, and the nato countries have not yet felt it, so i always warn them and insist on your part, that you underestimate... the possibility of russia striking a nato country, he wants it, and he will do it, if you are weak and do not help ukraine as much as possible now. mr. valery, the ukraine-nato council was held in brussels today, there is already preliminary information about the results, and as the ukrainian media already write, about the fact that kiev was promised weapons

worth billions, billions of euros this year, and... at the meeting, they talked about help in strengthening air defense in the 24th year, from the joint purchase of anti-aircraft missiles for patriot systems to skynex systems from germany and anti-aircraft missiles from great britain. the members of this council strongly condemned the escalation of russian airstrikes against ukraine, as well as the russian federation's use of ballistic missiles from north korea and drones from iran. it is said in the press release that appeared just now, well, what do you say, how this council has been working now for the past six months, and does it give ukraine additional opportunities to convince the north atlantic alliance that

ukraine is also a part of world security, a part of... a part of this great global system, which there is a north atlantic alliance, just de jure , it is not yet included in this process, well, you know, on the one hand, this is one of the results of vilnius, and it was presented as an achievement, the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine, dmytro kuleba, talked about symbolic things, what he is now seated in a different place, as a representative. country not as a guest, but as an equal participant at the common table, well , this is a kind of symbolism, of course, it is important for diplomacy, but in essence, in essence, what has changed, it seems to me, is the first thing... that ukraine can insist on these meetings, this is what has changed is that we as a country can, not what we ask for there, let's do it there someday , insist that the issue requires a meeting, this is from

a positive point of view, and in principle we really used it in the situation of large-scale attacks on ukraine and many risks, which will now be in terms of, well, in a broader sense of security, i think there was a discussion about this missile. poland, i think many points were discussed there in connection with the real or possibly even greater use of ballistic missiles in the future, but i will say what i would like to be discussed there, i would like to be discussed there a joint system air defense, air defense, for example, well, if not with nato, okay, let's go bilateral. equal, because nato is still such a mechanism, many countries, and as long as it expresses everything, then, i'm sorry, we can't wait for this for a long time,

that's why we have common points, maybe everything is legal and allowed, for example, crossing the border, yes, there are joint ukrainian-polish border crossings, but why can't we continue this development in the field of security, for example, why can't poland use its means... idps in coordination, or maybe in the system of joint management of ukraine-poland in order to shoot down missiles flying at poland, we can by a simple decision of the majority in the parliament ensure if poland from ours claims of a violation of sovereignty there in the event that these debris will fly, fall on our territory, there are border ones, we can, yes , this is such a story, if it is also unpleasant, but still, hitting missiles is much worse, so we must speak. about serious things , this is an expression of concern, you know , leave it to yourself in brussels, we need to talk about specifics, specifics, play it out,

play it out in brussels, because you are one step behind putin, one step behind putin, i am not for nato, i i mean the nato countries that have real ones opportunities in the field of security that help us, okay, but here is a specific example, poland's joint ppu system. romania, a joint air defense system, we can further develop joint training points with nato countries on the territory of ukraine. why does russia have bases in belarus, is it already talking about the transfer of nuclear warheads, and we still do not even have joint points, well , there were some training camps, yavoriv was held there, they were held near zhytomyr, why is there no such activity now, why are there no nato instructors, no need give us... give instructors only in sufficient numbers, let them work here, it 's your security, not only ukrainian, i don't hear the specifics, i don't see the specifics, that is, air defense

is not supplied to us by nato, it is not nato that supplies air defense, air defense is supplied by countries, thanks to them, nato, they have opportunities, which, by the way, they have not used so far, but we need new political solutions, a political signal about solutions, for example, at the washington summit, about that by the way spoke... the president of ukraine spoke in vilnius, it was said that we need him a signal that we have moved further than vilnius in the direction of euro-atlantic integration. i think that, well, it's not enough. that is, we need a decision, if you are not ready to accept us into the military structures of nato, as of today, then make a decision about the political structures of nato, and the beginning of this procedure. that is, what prevents? france was once in such conditions when it was... politically a member of nato, but did not participate in the military of any specific structures, so we can perfectly use, well, not this experience, but this a possibility that

is not limited by legislative or other procedures, the same washington treaty, where are the specifics, where are some new signals, this is already fed up, nato, russia is constantly pushing it, you said about an attack on a nato country, yes, russia is preparing it, nato does one step less, and well, i don't know what they need. this is what they need in order to understand that putin cannot be given the opportunity to be one step ahead of them, and he is two. thank you, mr. valery, friends, those who are watching us now on social networks, no please forget to like this video, because i'm watching, a lot of people are watching us now on youtube and facebook, you 're stingy and don't like our broadcast, please like it so that this video is trending youtube, well , take part in... our vote today we ask you about north korea and whether north korea will go to war against south korea, do you think, yes, no, please, if you have an opinion, write any affection. in

the comments below this video. if you are sitting in front of the tv, please pick up your phone and vote. you see phone numbers on the screen. if you think north korea will go to war against south korea 0 800 211 381 no (0800-211-382). all calls to these numbers are free. at the end of the program, we will sum up the results of this vote. mr. valeriu, john kirby, coordinator of white's national security council. stated that the united states of america has evidence that the russian army continued to strike ukraine with ballistic missiles last week of north korean production, and today this issue is being considered by the un security council, but the fact that these missiles will appear in russia sooner or later, they will be used in the war against ukraine, this was said at the end

of last year, when... kimchenin traveled to the far east, participated in some exhibitions there and saw factories together with vladimir putin, sergei shoiguh was also there in his time in north korea. as you have now indicated about the role of north korea not only in the russian-ukrainian war, but also in the formation of this axis of evil, iran, russia and north korea, because there was something similar. in the 20s and 30s, when there was also a triangle, the axis of evil, when there was fascist germany, italy and japan, and then there were small wars that were going on in every part of the world, when italy went to albania, when japan was at war with china, germany took the sudetenland, they became a puzzle of the second world war, is it not possible in this case

to hold... well, first of all , i just voted and they said my vote was counted, i will reveal a secret, i said from your choice , i said that north korea will do it, but they are still doing it, they have a war, well, if not stopped, they don't have a peace agreement, so they are still fighting, the provocation has increased, it will continue, and obviously . that the center of all this global geopolitical division and turbulence, in theory, according to various factors, it should be in this part of the world, there are a lot of such moments of conflict, such as north-south korea, nuclear pakistan and india, china's ambitions, deterrence with side

of japan, that is, a lot. such things, it firstly, secondly, the countries that were oriented, in particular, north korea itself, it is a dictatorial, well, not even just an authoritarian country, it is a very strict regime, which is oriented, militaristic self-survival at the expense of even poverty and hunger, very it often happens to people, that is, yes, it is very dangerous... a safe mode in a combination of ambitions, and they have already played with this story of threatening the world, and it happened before. now watch what happens, well you asked if they belong to this axis of evil, belong, of course, they have been recognized as such a country in many countries for a long time, sanctions have been imposed on them and so on, that is, north korea is also now having a new push with russia. russia, having from them... receiving

projectiles, receiving weapons that north korea was simply accumulating because it is preparing for war, they are really living in preparation for war. now we are talking about missiles, russia is fueling them with technologies, that is, this is a very serious concern, because in fact, now the council of the united nations has just ended, and there is a representative of the south korea spoke. it is very clear what ukraine is now for north korea, it is a training ground, the use and and tests, of its ballistic missiles, which can carry nuclear warheads in order to then use them against south korea, and from.