who are wanted. let's not be indifferent. we have created a resource through which you can report any crime against a child. in any place, at any time. just go to the site and report, and we will launch all possible mechanisms to punish the criminal. stopcrime.ua. there are 15% discounts on strength detox at the pharmacies of psylshynic, pam and ochad, there are discounts on amicitron of 20% at pharmacies psyasnyk, pam and ochad. 93 separate mechanized brigade kholotny yar is in dire need of fv drones.

to effectively hit the enemy and increasing the loss of living and non-living forces of the occupier. to get closer to the victory that all of ukraine is waiting for. glory to ukraine. glory be to the heroes. an unusual look at the news. good health, ladies and gentlemen, my name is mykola verysyn. sharp presentation of facts and competent opinions. and in america they also say, let's make better roads. we will have even better ones, a special view of events in ukraine, there will be some katsaps on the border of kyiv and beyond, what a world dreams of, norman, can we imagine it? all this in an informational marathon with mykola in september, saturday 17:10, sunday 18:15 at espresso. hello, this is svoboda ranok,

an informational project of radio svoboda. top guests every day. this is the shipping district, kherson. turn on live. we are somewhere in the vicinity of bakhmut. we tell the main thing. on weekdays at 9:00. vasyl zima's big broadcast. two hours of airtime, two hours of your time. two hours to learn about war and how the world lives. hours to keep abreast of economic and sports news, two hours in the company of favorite presenters, presenters who have become familiar to many, as well as respected guests of the studio, the events of the day in two hours, vasyl zima's big broadcast, a project for smart and caring people, espresso in the evening. verdict with serhiy rudenko, from now on in a new two-hour format, even more analytics, even more important topics, even more top guests, foreign experts. inclusion from

abroad, about ukraine, the world, the front, society, and also feedback, you can express your opinion at any time of the day with the help of a telephone survey, turn on and turn on, the verdict with serhiy rudenko, every weekday, from 20 until 10 pm for espresso. the espresso channel and ukrainian pen present the self-titled project with myroslava barchuk. a series of conversations with ukrainian and western intellectuals, who interpret and comment on the most relevant social discussions, what news will be analyzed by the guests of the project this week and, in fact, who will be the guest of the studio , we will find out already this sunday, unequivocally, the topics will be relevant, the guests will be special, their own names with myroslava barchuk, sunday 17:10 at espresso.

greetings, dear ones! tv viewers, on the air of

the espresso tv channel, the west studio program. we will analyze the most important events of this week, in particular, the consequences of the davos forum, in particular for ukraine. we will also analyze extreme danger. signal from the kremlin, in particular the former president of russia medvedev declared that russia will wage war not only against the ukrainian state, but against what is called ukrainianness. matthew bryza and mark fagin talk about it on our broadcast. and now mark feigen, a figure of the russian opposition in emigration, former deputy of the state duma, iconic video blogger, will work on the air of the tv channel. glory congratulations to ukraine, mark. glory to the heroes, congratulations anton, congratulations to all the viewers, well, i would not like to work. an analyst for medvedev, but he gave an extremely harsh, boorish and dangerous signal, and here the key story is how seriously we should interpret what medvedev wrote, i don't know if he is from bodun or not from bodun, but in any case he described the situation as the preparation of the russian federation

for the so-called existential war with ukraine. medvedev is not the first to publish something similar and even more barbaric, let me remind you he recently in connection with the visit of the prime minister. in his words, he is an official, not some ordinary propagandist. therefore, it is possible that medvedev conveys the atmosphere of the mood that prevails in the security council in the kremlin, because he is allowed to make such a presentation. presumably , they use it to test, provoke,

check the reaction that may be to such statements. yes, they are wild and completely infernal. but it is interesting for the kremlin, they like it. and what is valuable and important here, because putin himself said no less barbaric things two days ago. he said that fools do not want to negotiate with us. everyone has heard these quotes that everything would have ended a long time ago, you yourself understand, this is his direct quote: we will not give back any captured territories, we are not even talking about a referendum, but we have captured and will not give it back, and everyone in the west understands this, etc. putin also spoke about the baltic countries, which are expelling some agents of moscow under the threat of national security. he justified this by saying that the russian-speaking population would be protected in the same way as in ukraine. alluding to the war in the baltic states. i would say that even though not

in form, but in content, what putin himself declares differs little in aggressiveness of rhetoric. regarding ukraine: first of all, in ukraine they have already waged an aggressive war and are killing people. can we expect more from them, for example, the use of nuclear weapons? it's always a story that has a crazy explanation, but who said that the kremlin is irrational in its behavior and cannot allow for itself just such a course of events? therefore, it is worth listening to such words, you need to study them despite the insignificant source. from which they proceed, because certain attitudes of medvedev are still transmitted from the kremlin. existential war for existence is already a question of interpretations, because today, too , the question arose without the use of unconventional means precisely about the threat to the existence of ukraine itself. this is exactly

what the kremlin is trying to do, so you can't make any promises about negotiations, because the goal of negotiations with moscow is not consolidation. status quo, compromises, etc., and capitulation, that is, the destruction of ukraine as a subject of international law, as a sovereign state as an independent nation. there should be no illusions here, there should be no naive expectations on this issue that moscow is ready to stop at something. no, medvidev said: "we will never detach ourselves from ukraine, i read and translated it in ukrainian." this is stated by an official of a country that is a permanent member... of danger with the right of veto, a founding country of the un, which guarantees, in fact, as one of the five states, the same international security throughout the world, on the scale of the planet. this should be perceived as the real position of the kremlin and its inhabitants. well, the key story is

how relevant the so-called collective event will be, as we listened to several extremely important speeches, in particular at the davos forum. so we understand that the president of france. kron also gave a signal, in particular, it is about supplying us with additional scalp missiles. so we understand that they have worked extremely well in their time. we understand that there is a question about money. and about the joint strategy, but the key story is how seriously the west has become involved in what is called the military deterrence of the kremlin, or is it, so to speak, that we are moving along a certain palliative path, that is, the kremlin will constantly increase the production of weapons, if not by itself, then it will borrow them from the chinese or korean republics, well, when i talk about korean, i am talking about the north korea and so on and so on. do you know starting from the autumn, but really from the end of the winter of 2023 , the situation began to change, because

the american administration began to behave more cautiously. she also verbally supports ukraine, but to tell the truth, this delay allocation of 60 billion for ukraine and disputes between republicans and democrats suggest the worst thoughts. in contrast , europe, on the contrary, somehow became radicalized not only by macron. scholz and some persons from the german leadership despite the decision of the bundestag to retain and not provide taurus missiles to ukraine. in addition, they generally take a fairly clear position and publicly articulate it. instead, in america, as we can see, the strong influence of the presidential election campaign, which is already taking place and will end in november 2024 year how does it affect ukraine's support for military aid. directly affects,

even the biden administration, in contrast to the republicans, behaves much more cautiously. there is information from bloomberg that sullivan will convey the position of the white house in davos. we need to move into a positional stage, a defensive position for ukraine, as we understand it, until november 2024, until it is decided who will become the owner of the oval office in the following... years. it is a strange position for the simple reason that this is exactly what moscow is striving for, so that behind this positional defense, a change in tactics and strategies, to give her a break, to give her an opportunity to accumulate strength, and then surely no sullivan will stop her from offensive actions, not to mention the fact that there is no plan b. well, well, ukraine will build up defenses anyway and mine as necessary to protect...

sullivan and the biden administration are offering some kind of plan in case that happens, maybe if trump comes, that's my view, maybe as soon as possible is better to saturate ukraine with money and weapons so that it will last for a while until trump comes to power after inauguration in january 2020. there are many questions, many of which we will hear the answer to when the senate does decide whether it will undertake to solve the issue of the allocation of this ill-fated $60 billion. we will understand then whether the american establishment is ready, as before, during these two

years, to support ukraine in its defense of sovereignty in this war with russia, that is the question. mark, well, you've outlined very clearly, so to speak, two speeds, at least two or three geopolitical speeds. on the one hand, we understand what the kremlin is counting on the american election campaign, we understand that it will be far from... far from simple, to put it mildly, that is, scenarios of certain cannibalism are already beginning there, we understand that the kremlin is counting on a series of elections in the countries of the european union, on general fatigue, so pam if we consider the speech of this extremely strange provocateur of the slovak deputy to the european parliament, who started talking about the brothers of the slavs and so on and so forth, to reconcile, then we have certain corresponding scenarios that krem is very clearly counting on. in particular, when it comes to his preparation for various, possibly global things, about

global threats, president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi said recently. if you try to reduce all this matter into a single concept. what you see now, for example, medium-term and short-term movements on the part of the kremlin and, in general, how we will properly build our, i don't know, international communication. for the first time, trump himself adds to the fire , saying that he would have agreed with putin, that putin is a normal dude, he evaluates him in a business way, and this is taking into account the primaries in iowa, where he received 51%, but... this is a dangerous signal, that is, he continues, despite the situation, to publicly voice his complementary attitude towards putin. he does not try to silence this issue, to avoid it during the election campaign, no, he clearly marks it. why is it important, if suddenly he wins the election, he will say: "listen, i did not

deceive you, dear voters and partners of the united states." i said during the election campaign about my position that i am up to... agreeing, he maximizes the result, demands capitulation, we we simply do not know what trump will be ready for in the event that he comes to the white house and changes the strategy of the american administration accordingly, another question is whether he is capable of doing this, and as he himself, he himself says about it, i would agree, but on which conditions... and 80% you agreed, well with putin, agreed, offered this plan to ukraine, and 80% remain sovereign, they go to nato, to the eu. this is where i seem to have a lot of illusions, maybe trump thinks that he is just spraying, here is your share of profits, here is mine, he thinks like a developer. he is not

ceases to be them, even despite the previous first and. from 2016 to 2020, in which he was the president of the united states. i always like the criticism of the trumpists, who say, oh, poor trump, he is not allowed anywhere , he is persecuted everywhere, and he has not only already served the term of the president for four years, he is going to sit it again, and i do not see that he is already being so kindly persecuted , preventing him from participating in the election campaign, at least in the nomination for the republican party nomination. therefore, in this difficult situation, because of ukraine, kyiv is braver you need to act, try with the american establishment, trump's entourage, at least find out finally what strategy you plan to follow. yes, trump will determine a lot, but he will rely on the congressional majority, which for now will be republican in the house of representatives, in particular. and what is the us strategy in the event that

a change of power occurs, at least it would be desirable to get. trump, that fundamentally nothing will change strategically, that ukraine will be supported in the war with moscow, on the one hand, on the other hand, it is really necessary assess the situation, whoever is the candidate from the republican party , biden's chances for today, i don't know what will change, a lot of things can change, at the moment they are small, for today we have to get out of this for now, well, we have a year together with by the biden administration. and the key story is how to use this time right now, yes, in particular it is about resources, and on the other hand, i would like to be able to feel what the kremlin is capable of now. we understand that the kremlin can threaten, but threats are questions real ability, it's a little different. the main thing you can get from biden now

is that you have to continue to fight for these 60 billion, try to convince both republicans and democrats. that they are necessary, it is necessary to achieve at the summer nato summit, which will be hosted by washington and biden, the 75-year anniversary summit of nato, so that the invitation to join nato in ukraine is given. this is the best guarantee of safety and the rest. yes, this is a process, it will not happen in one day, there will still be a discussion within nato, and maybe it will be for another year, so that make some decisions. acceptance of ukraine into nato. but this will be compensation for the fact that the democrats may lose power and the situation may change radically. membership in nato and coverage by the collective agreement of the north atlantic alliance is, after all , compensation for all the problems that are already visible, at least until november 2024. this seems to me to be a fundamental key

point, if biden does not dare to do so, and this is a historic decision. we are aware of people. in the ninth decade, the chances of staying for another four years are illusory, not zero, but are not clear, maybe something else will change radically, and of course, this would be some kind of compensation, the creation of a certain guarantee that this tool will help ukraine defend itself in the coming months, or even years. mark, and putin, what will putin do in the current situation, what can putin do and what he is simply not in a position to do, well, i don't know, due to lack of resources. or certain fears that not just some bashkartostan scenario could be implemented, but some additional one, well, we understand how they react very, very much to something like this. it's not even putin is hiding in anticipation of the elections, he says that the counteroffensive failed with the ssu, the entire initiative is in the hands of the russian troops, this is stated publicly, that is, he does not give up

hope that some of the offensive operations will end in success, for example, marienko, although this is a very specific operation , when russian troops entered the almost destroyed settlement. besides, look, because they tried to advance on avdiivka. more than two months, the result... to none, before that there was a very acute situation with kupyansk, kupyansk is a knotty road, the road is opening to kharkiv. i was in those places, i had the opportunity to see everything directly, i looked down on the oskol river, i was in kupyansk and in the center and at the positions. it is difficult for me to imagine how much effort and resources need to be spent to take kupyansk. i suspect that it is the same in avdiivka, i have not been there, i really wanted to visit, but i suspect. that it is not too easy there, in the area of ​​the coke plant, you will put another 1040 people to take it all, a pyrrhic victory. perhaps it has a political connotation, he

needs to show at least something before his elections on march 17. it's not for the sake of to win the elections, it is clear that there are no elections, he is simply drawn by these 80-85%, and it is important for him to control public opinion, that everything is not in vain. see yes, we fight, we advance slowly, we want something and occupy, but all the sacrifices are not in vain, all the expenses are not in vain, we achieve some incredible geopolitical success in the long run, protecting our defense capabilities and the like. so putin, of course, despite the wait-and-see attitude , is definitely preparing for the period of the us elections and will start some offensive actions in the east, possibly in the south, in the south more difficult, but in the east it can be assumed. and with belarusian? direction? no, i think he can stand the pause. what is the price? if you try to get involved again through belarus, some

hostilities, there will be a problem with lukashenka. what is lukashenko afraid of? he is angry at ukraine and belarus, actually, too, but he is afraid that ukraine will respond. ukraine already has the means to shoot at his residence, kill someone from his entourage, and no one will hang around like it was in february. can russia launch an attack from the territory of the russian federation? exactly to these border towns? can this be expected? this is an open question. in my opinion,

such an operation is more likely than an invasion from the territory of belarus. because lukashenko himself will deal with such a development to the last, because he understands that it will leave him no chance. he no longer has relations with the west, and it is clear what kind of relations he has with the kremlin. but with ukraine , there is such an unspoken parity: you don't touch us, you don't allow a new massacre and a similar horror that happened, and we still endure all this. and lukashenka is satisfied with this status quo, and if this situation is to be moved, who knows, you won't be able to reach putin, but lukashenka is much easier. that's the thing. therefore, i believe that everything will be much more difficult there, even if it happens, lukashenka will not be asked. mark , well, an intimate, delicate question, i would not like to spread conspiracy theories, but oleksiy restovych and his strange interview, strange

conversation with latinina, i watched this case, and my eyes became much bigger than in latinina behind glasses , so even she already is i couldn't stand it, oleksiy started to turn something into a fan that simply does not fit into... the concept, but you, as a person who has worked with him for more than one hour on the air, so i think you read oleksiy himself very well, in general, i would like to ask you what is happening with him now, in your opinion, i always, when i am asked questions, answer for the period when he was on my airs, then there were also some shoals, but this is not what is happening now, all one and a half years it was possible to claim that he was not something

what happened to him next, i said in august, when many people criticized me for having stopped doing programs with him, the first alarms started already in the summer, they scared and alarmed me a lot, because arestovych said , that he has political ambitions, that he wants to become president, i don't understand how you can become president without a president. it seems to me that a lot of things in terms of preferences were dictated precisely by this, i will criticize the government and thereby earn points for my election campaign, we will have something from this. that's how i saw it, huh now this cannot be explained, because the position is strange, then he and putin want to sue europe and the west, then

praise lukashenko. a great patriot of his country, then i'm sorry, says: "uh, no, everything was wrong, then i scared you, and now i stop scaring you and return to another, previous position. such zigzags are incomprehensible to me, with such a person i do not i would make programs now under no circumstances, what is really happening with arostovych, i do not know, i do not communicate with him even in august 2023. many accuse him of a pro-moscow position and almost not in connection with the kremlin or even the fsb. i do not know this, but i want to say that if you have chosen such a position, then you must be in ukraine, in kyiv, at least, without saying that you are on the front line, you must take such a position inside ukraine, it is correct, after all, if you you pronounce it at home, then trust in you is higher, that is, a person sees that this is how it should be, and abroad, it looks somewhat unconvincing, to put it very mildly, if you have such

a position... then be kind, when you are already applying for the position of president of ukraine or ukrainian politics, you have to do it all at home, if you feel in danger for yourself , then this also explains a lot why such a change in views happened, because the question is not that the authorities do not like this position, but why you were an adviser to the president before that , from february, as soon as the war began, the head of the office, as far as i remember. yes, he was an adviser to the head of the office, something like that was written in the certificate on public grounds, he was a part-time employee, you voiced one position, then another position began in 2023, it is somewhat frightening, and it is strange, you, or then he said something that did not correspond to reality, although he did not say anything so dubious then, let it be two or three weeks already, but it has already become a weighted assessment, his personal opinion. now he says:... zelensky

is a corruptor and a dictator, and why didn't you say this before? did you see it when you worked in the president's office? why was he silent then? and in your opinion, marko, is it psychology or political technology, what is working in it now, well, i understand that this is a question, you know, up to your intuition. i think that the first, there is some an attempt to manipulate, rastovych does not hide it, he says openly, i do not see a political position here. during his biography, he went through various stages, it seemed to me that a person has become wiser, there is a little more to 50 years, a year or two, you need to have some kind of consistent position. i am a person who has never changed my position, for which i have been criticized all my life, i have been unequivocal all my life and i have always appreciated that in others. principledness, when a person has the same position, adheres to the same views. this does not mean that it is not possible criticize, change attitudes towards people,

but in the main... issues you need to remain who you are, it is impossible if you are a supporter of liberal ideology to become a communist, for me it is nonsense, just like changing your views, depending on your condition, in power you or not , and why did you go there, you were on public grounds, it seems to me that there is some psychological defect in oleksiy aristovych, or something was not added to him, or he thinks that he was underestimated, in my opinion, there is something personal here , thank you very much mark for this... frankly and extremely interesting conversation i want to remind our tv viewers that mark fegin, an activist of the russian emigration in exile, a former deputy of the state duma of the russian federation and a well-known blogger, was currently working on the spresso broadcast. thanks mark. thank you, everyone, all the best. 93 separate mechanized brigade kholotny yar is in dire need of an asset.