under such conditions it is absolutely true. thank you very much for the inclusion, for your explanation, i will remind our viewers that it was andrii kepkalo, the founder and head of the private military company omega consulting group. and then we will talk about weapons, more precisely about the bill on civilian firearms rights, there are many comments on this bill, and we will talk about it in the context of how it affects positively or rather negatively the training of our military, in particular the training of our snipers , but about... everything after advertising and information block, there are discounts on paracetamol darnytsia 10% in pharmacies psyllium, bam and oshchad, there are discounts on ziepelor 10% in pharmacies psyllium vam and oshchadnyk 90. ​​the third

separate mechanized brigade cold poison has an urgent need for fivi drones. to effectively hit the enemy and increase the losses of living and non-living forces of the occupier. to get closer to the victory that all of ukraine is waiting for. glory to ukraine. glory be to the heroes. i congratulate you. this is svoboda live on radio svoboda. we are already the following shots approached the snake itself you can be shocked: live news from the scene of events, kamikaze drone attacks, political analytics, objective and meaningful, there is no political season, exclusive interviews, reports from the hottest points of the front, svoborlai frankly and impartially, you draw your own conclusions.

continue with our program on war and weapons, and we will continue to talk about how we train our professional snipers, but still in the context of the debate on the gun bill, which is now due for second reading in our parliament, there are many nuances, unpleasant, as for me, nuances, and about this... we will now talk with our next guest, we are joined by yuriy chornomorets, doctor of philosophy, volunteer and sniper, mr. yuriy, i congratulate you, i am glad to see and hear , good afternoon everyone, i was going to talk about sniping , but i think that will be the second part of our conversation, because first, after all, the story with the firearms bill, it worries me a little, to put it mildly, because it cannot be in the conditions , when there is a war, we try... aren't we there, the government

trying to screw things up in terms of making weapons so difficult to use. i know that you have read this bill in detail, or, but you know all these... painful moments related to this bill, i would like to hear your opinion, do we need such a law in the conditions of war? i want to say that the original intention of the draft law was, accordingly, to allow citizens to have wider opportunities to own weapons, and first of all , this is for self-defense, and secondly... again , for the protection of the homeland in the conditions that on today there are, but as a result of the work of the specialized committee, as a result of the work of the ministry of internal affairs, we have very strange such amendments, er, which are stricter than

even russian legislation, and which are simply frankly, well, let's say, such knives in the back , at the moment, the ukrainian defense, here is the first thing that catches the eye, if, let's say directly, that according to this bill, for example, you cannot take out, as an instructor, you cannot take out a sniper group to the training ground, especially there to the landfill in the neighboring region and so on, you should be assigned to the ministry of internal affairs and so on, suddenly, it means that someone pretended that you did not do it or something. here you are immediately imprisoned, of course, what is your notification to the ministry of internal affairs is very easy to lose, and then the person is guilty. again, we see that, well, for example, you are a sniper , for example, in the sumy region, yes, and you are,

for example, a part of the armed forces that fights and protects the border, but... you are raised on an alarm at night and thrown into another area, where you accordingly cover the enemy's breakthrough, you fight heroically, then it turns out that once you they did it with their personal sniper weapons, i would like to emphasize that a very significant part of the snipers fight with their personal sniper weapons, we only have 244 rifles that we provided to the defense forces of ukraine. 241 was given for personal use, here it turns out that you are already a violator of the law, and you must bear a very strict responsibility for this, of course , which is absurd, because training becomes impossible, combat work becomes impossible,

it becomes impossible that you, for example, there because comrades-in-arms who have certificates of the same caliber, simply you hand over ammunition to the guys from... that means ammunition to the front, you are already to blame, and here are such totalitarian tendencies, they are very strange to me, because ah, all this effort to do so is completely impossible, actually in ukraine, for example, sniping , the constant training of the civilian population is impossible, all this naturally undermines the defense capability very seriously, and then there are very absurd requirements regarding... ownership of short-barreled weapons, many snipers cannot carry with them for self-defense, accordingly, well, i don’t know, some arch, something else, and would like to have i have a glock 17, 19 or 45 with me,

but, let's say, it is very difficult to get it, and very often people buy it, wait until they are awarded with this weapon. then they are either not awarded, or they are awarded there with a weapon that they already had, and so on, people do not have the weapons that they would like, for which they would have already paid money, well , in the professionalism of these people in that , that they 're not going to use these weapons left and right, clearly there's no question, at the same time some people that i don't know are absolutely... immature, they there in chernivtsi, like the son of a judge, they start shooting in the air, from awarded weapons, and now it is proposed that such people be awarded, they have been there since the age of 18, in fact, to award a military man, then on the contrary, this

is impossible, because all kinds of brutality are expected there , pleasure, and it's all absurd, it's all stupid, and by the way, it's systemic. because, for example, a few years ago we made a workshop for repairing weapons from ammunition, there were some requirements, and, let's say, those. we saw that yes, it is, let's say, well, very difficult to pull, but you can, now that it turned out that we are already doing it, we urgently need it in one of the regions of ukraine, and accordingly, it is really related to the military unit, to the combat brigade, here it turned out that there are such strict requirements for what this workshop should be and so on, that is, not only is there... an absurd law, but there are all sorts of various, bureaucratic prescriptions that

are accepted at the bottom, also, they also make it more brutal, and accordingly very often make the development of sniping, the development of the population's ability to self-defense, this is absurd, if we look at bulgaria, when a law was passed that all people have the right to carry a gun, there are women there, well, anyone, then accordingly... immediately crime fell 10-12 times, i.e. yes, there are excesses, of course, and so on, but the psychology of the population changes very immediately , and even i would say, well, we should have stopped being afraid a long time ago if the armed population of the kyiv region met the russian federation, it would be a completely different war, and if we they would not have so much, say, on the first day of gostomeli, there are so many... problems and the like, that is, it is already clear here, obviously, we realized in practice that we should have it like

in texas, that everyone can own a weapon, and accordingly every responsible citizen, he really has the right and to protect our own livelihood and to protect our homeland, including our own weapons, whereas when we talk about these amendments to the bill, in fact... you can argue that they pose systemic risks to our defense capability, because firstly, they limit our training system, they minimize, relatively speaking, the readiness of the population to fight for the enemy with various small arms, and then the question arises, who is then in the parliament, relatively speaking , pushing this bill, because a significant number of references actually come from the ministry of internal affairs, well, somehow it does not look entirely logical and appropriate, because the ministry of internal affairs is also... the language brigade is fighting on the front line, why then are there so many critical things in this draft law

that are actually unacceptable from the point of view of defense capability, do you have an understanding of why this is in the parliament, yes, well, it is clearly manifested now? well, it is completely incomprehensible to me, especially now it is the anniversary of the death of denys monastyrskyi, and they are all very proud of the fact that he decided to give out machine guns. who got it in kyiv, well, if, well, we remember this controversial decision, when military volunteers came, let's say, to the territorial defense, like ours, and let's say, they didn't get these assault rifles, and it's unknown who is there i took them on the shell, and they needed something else for the picture, i don't understand this shuffling from side to side, actually, and accordingly you have... there is an extremely simple thing, yes, you have a conscious population, this population is a nation that

protects itself, that's why it is clear that you are quite capable in the modern information world, let's say to avoid such excesses, so that the weapon was there in crime, we remember how one of the volunteers was shot there by bandits, on the porches, according to the weapon that the convicted person received, according to your ministry of internal affairs, and accordingly, he used this weapon kiltek 9 mm, and accordingly from this carbine shot an azov volunteer, and here, accordingly, well, it is an extremely, very simple situation, if you would, put yourself in order, even with... according to the existing rules, let it work and let people already

train, let people therefore acquire professions and so on, and on the contrary, think through the system, how you can really liberalize, let's say, this whole situation of weapons, allow more people, and accordingly, so that people are really responsible for the future of the country. not just like, let's say, well, at the moment they answer, and the way they in israel answer that they know that they either have weapons at home and they will immediately go to fight. or, let's say, they know where the nearest point is, where to get this weapon, and it's his very rifle, shot by him, with which he accordingly knows all its features, and he will fight with it, because you understand, then here are all these recipes for handing out automatic weapons , well, then they gave out machine guns, and what, and then in the quarry we went there, shot,

because it was unclear even how he shoots, well, actually he... he deviates right, left , up, down, all that, well, a gun is a precision tool that you have to have, you have to set it up so that it doesn't have any flaws, and accordingly, if, well, you have to use it, if there is a danger for your country, all the more absurd are all these amendments, that if they are simply going to destroy the s... sniper business in ukraine, then accordingly , for this alone, these amendments should all be thrown into the trash can, because snipers do a great job, respectively 12% of losses among russians, this is the work of snipers, and accordingly, at the present moment , he has no right to do anything with a sniper,

accordingly, neither a step to the right nor a step to the left with anything, neither with a rifle, nor with ammunition. and accordingly, well, some absurd situation, which , i don't know, they copied from some south korea, because even in russia there are no such absurd norms regarding the possession of weapons. mr. yuri, rather, probably from north korea, we have literally two minutes, i would like you to tell us about what the funds are currently being collected for, what you are currently purchasing, where to donate, because that the work you are doing now for sniping, it is extremely important, tell me about... what are we collecting, where to donate? well we are collecting for very good super rifles now as we managed to get long range rifles it's a macmillent yes 50 in a cadex box we managed to attract a few each one is a super rifle and according to how we had a record with a

horizon holder , then this very rifle was the very first in the world and from... accordingly, 3.5 km once, accordingly, we got out of it, accordingly, we also got vitrixes in the 375th caliber, we tried actually 408 caliber, well, we’re still thinking , we’ll still carry it in the 375th, and we’re also carrying a large batch of berets in 416 caliber, new berets, it’s a very cool weapon, so everyone is fascinated by it, because it’s very... deep-killing the destruction of the enemy's manpower there , respectively 2.5 km and so on from a cold barrel with the first shot you can hit and it's very cool that's why we are very impressed because the x375 caliber as well as the 50 bmg caliber turned out to be extremely accurate, accordingly we are also very

satisfied hereby. we are trying now in sniper groups. to give to those who can pull such long-range, high-precision rifles and already, let's say, from the 338 caliber , he has extracted everything he could extract, we are trying to give these rifles, correspondingly of a larger caliber, and you can see that the come back alive fund is also collecting very correctly for whole groups there with machines, with everything , as we usually do, and they collect there for 100 cadexes in 375 caliber, i don’t really understand what this bed will show later as a result, but at least these rifles will be, and if if everything is bad, then it will be possible rework them later, and accordingly, we are still paying great attention to the fact that

any sniper group is large, it is completely defenseless if it... does not have its own drones, and accordingly, the ratio turns out to be from six to 10 snipers and, accordingly, four drone operators who are working because both the aerial surveillance is constant and the drone strikes and it's showing very well, that's the combination, if the snipers are going out now without drones, it's extremely high risk and it's counterproductive when... very thanks for these clear ones explanation about the bill, i think we will be heard, this bill will not be adopted in the format it is currently proposed, thank you very much for. the work you are doing for our armed forces, i will remind the viewers that you can donate on facebook, there are the details of yuriy chornomorets, which

can be used to purchase rifles for our armed forces, i will remind our viewers that my interlocutor was yuriy chornomorets , this is a theologian, a volunteer and a sniper, then stay on the espresso channel, where it will be much more new information. watch this week's judicial control program with tetyana shustrova, searches in the dnipro district court of kyiv, what was the state bureau of investigation looking for? this is obstruction of justice, this is a crime. but how did the law enforcement officers break the law? we have reached out to the state bureau of investigation for their explanation. congratulations, you are watching judicial control and i am tatyana shosto. despite the full-scale war, ukraine continues its path to the european union and does not stop in implementing reforms, including judicial reform. but in the process of transformation

the judiciary continues to face challenges and threats, from often dependent and biased justice to outright pressure on the judiciary from law enforcement . however, how does the state bureau of investigation intervene in the administration of justice in the dnipro district court. we will talk about kyiv today, but first the news: the son of the scandalous judge of the now liquidated district administrative court of kyiv, yevhen ablov, was arrested on suspicion of premeditated murder. on january 4, 27-year-old ivan ablov was declared wanted. on the 15th he voluntarily surrendered to the police. according to the case materials, during the new year's celebration in the country cottage, ablov jr. was in a state of alcohol intoxication. quarrel with one of those present, took a kitchen knife and stabbed the man in the chest, he died on the spot. so far, the court has taken ivan ablov into custody until march 3 without the right to post

bail. we will remind you that the father of the arrested yevhen ablov, the former deputy head of the scandalous, now liquidated district administrative court of kyiv, is one of the most odious judges in the country. ablov is a defendant in the case of plivok vovka about the attempted seizure of state power and interference in... the work of judicial bodies. bohdan lviv, a judge of the cassation commercial court within the supreme court, who has russian citizenship, was reinstated. in addition, the kyiv district administrative court ordered lviv to pay the average salary for the period of forced absenteeism for the period from october 5, 2022, when it was deducted. we will remind you that bohdan lviv turned out to be a citizen of russia. he received a russian passport back in 1999, when he was already working as a judge in ukraine, and in 2012, at the age of 45, he renewed this document. the judge's family also owns real estate in moscow.

the security service of ukraine confirmed lviv's russian citizenship. however, he himself continues to assure that he does not have a passport of the aggressor country. last year, the supreme council of justice dismissed 325 judges. 293 judges were dismissed in connection with the submission of applications for resignation. due to special...circumstances, the supreme administrative court dismissed a total of seven judges, six of them for committing a significant disciplinary offense and one judge based on a recommendation of the higher qualification commission of judges of ukraine. last year, as a candidate for the european union, ukraine fulfilled four of the seven criteria required by the council of the eu to maintain its status. in particular, the judicial reform has been fully implemented in the part of competitions for judicial governance bodies. with the participation of international experts, the supreme council of justice and the supreme qualification commission of judges were updated , and while the judicial system is rebooted to meet the high

international standards of justice, ukrainian power structures operate according to old schemes, by force last week, employees of the state bureau of investigation raided the dnipro district court of kyiv, without any court decision. urgent search in connection with an emergency. namely related to saving property. no court decision authorizing such a search was given to anyone. they came without a court order. the law requires a court order to confirm that their actions, that is, the actions of a law enforcement agency , have legal grounds. the law, of course, allows an urgent search, there is such a thing, but this it should be. well, the circumstances are extraordinary, so urgent that if they are put in place, there will be such negative consequences. the investigative actions lasted 5 hours and

were accompanied. gross violations, the press service of the dnipro district court emphasizes. at the entrance to the building, the security forces searched all employees of the apparatus, investigators, prosecutors and even ordinary visitors. they checked not only personal things, but also the contents of mobile phones and other devices. at the same time , the personal search of women was carried out by men. the main purpose of the alleged an urgent search was to gain access to the official computer of judge yulia ivanina. according to the court statement. found and access was obtained to the draft court decision in the case, as well as to other drafts and court decisions, in which the personal data of the participants in the court proceedings are indicated, while the full text of the specified court decision was not announced at the time of the search. the main purpose of the urgent search was for the investigators to gain access to the official computer belonging to dniprovskyi district court. as stated in the sbi, the search took place within the framework of criminal proceedings based on

the fact. alleged assistance to a criminal organization, law enforcement officers assure: the investigative actions are not aimed at exerting pressure on the judge, interfering with the administration of justice and obstructing the judge's activities or the performance of his official duties. however, it is difficult to call what happened other than pressure. the head of the dnipro district court of the city of kyiv filed a statement about the commission of a crime of abuse of power or official authority by law enforcement officers organ to dniprovska. district attorney's office, however, according to the response, the indicated appeal was forwarded by the prosecutor's office to the state bureau of investigation. during the search, the investigator took a photo of the text of the yet-to-be-announced court decision on his personal mobile phone and sent the photo to someone via messenger. intervening and withdrawing the future decision and transferring it somewhere else is such an impudent interference in the administration of justice that cannot

withstand any criticism. uh, and you must understand, but then how to evaluate all these actions? but this is, in principle, a crime and what kind of crime provided for by article 365 of the criminal code, that is, it is an excess of power. the official who made the decision to conduct the search must be immediately dismissed and a criminal case initiated against him. the sbi also removed data from video surveillance cameras, copies of work reports. time and even orders for the leave of judge yulia ivanina for 2022 and 2023. these documents and videos do not relate to the rescue of property at all and should have been obtained by employees of the state bureau of investigation in a legal manner, determined the criminal procedure code of ukraine. in addition, copies of the protocols of the searches in the specified premises were not provided

for signature and were not handed over. to an authorized person of the dnipro district court of the city of kyiv. the supreme court immediately responded to the illegal actions of the sbi. there they declare the inadmissibility of pressure from the servants of themis and the interference of law enforcement agencies in the activities of the court. the supreme court draws attention to the fact that the conduct of investigative actions, in particular searches in courts, itself carries significant threats to the independence of judges. cases of intervention in activity of a judge in connection with his adoption of court decisions and disagreement with. proceedings are inadmissible. the supreme court turned to the director of the dbr, who is directly responsible for the actions of his employees, and demands an explanation. meanwhile, the assembly of judges of the dnipro district court appealed to the supreme council of justice, the council of judges of ukraine and the office of the prosecutor general with a statement about interference in the administration of justice. we emphasize that such illegal actions violate the basic principles of the legal system, the principles of criminal law.

proceedings undermine confidence in legal institutions and have a potentially harmful effect on the work of the judicial branch of government. the meeting of judges of the obolon district court also stood up for colleagues. in a corresponding statement to the supreme council of justice, they called on the supreme judicial council and the council of judges, in case of confirmation of violations by the sbi, to take measures to bring to justice those who violated the guarantees of independence of judges. the authorities should not let this happen. if grp. ugh, that there really are signs of a crime here, they turn to of the prosecutor general, and prosecutor general andriy kostin, must immediately enter the data into the edpr and bring all of them to criminal proceedings, as an example for the whole of ukraine. on january 16, the supreme council of justice was supposed to consider the appeal of the meeting of the dnipro district court regarding alleged pressure from the sbi. however, the bureau did not provide an

explanation of its actions or answers. on the requested information, so vrp