it will freeze , it will still be cold, i apologize, it will mostly be wet snow, and the temperature, well, as you can see, from one to three, in some places even up to 4-5 degrees of heat, in the north of ukraine, tomorrow there will be a gusty wind from the south - in the western direction, the air temperature will vary from one to two degrees below zero to three degrees of heat, and wet snow will also be observed in the north, but already in the evening in the extended... it will just be cloudy weather, please note this to yourself, in the east of ukraine tomorrow without significant precipitation, and on in kharkiv oblast, luhansk oblast, and donetsk oblast, the air temperature will be much lower, because at night it will be up to 7:12, and during the day it will be 2-4 degrees below zero. in the central part of ukraine, on a large area, precipitation is not expected, but in vinnytsia, in the afternoon or evening , there is a possibility of a little wet snow, and the air temperature in the center. from two frosts

to three heats. in the southern part of ukraine tomorrow, the weather is expected to be cloudy with clearing, perhaps, by the way, the air temperature is quite high, +2 +5°, but also windy and in kyiv, in the capital, tomorrow , january 24, the weather is expected to be mostly cloudy, it will freeze a little at night, in the afternoon, as you can see, it will be somewhere around 3° warm, and it will continue. mostly without precipitation, a little wet snow is expected in the capital already tomorrow evening, this is the closest synoptic ukrainian perspective, of course, keep a close eye on our detailed forecasts on the espresso channel. well, it's not tiring, thank you natalka didenko, extremely filigree precisely and voluminously, well, it's perfect. weather forecast,

probably of all that is issued on any from world television, thank you, in the meantime , a search operation is underway in kharkiv, it is assumed that there may still be people under the rubble after this morning's shelling by the russians, i assume that it may be three people, let me remind you, there are already eight, unfortunately, who died in kharkiv and more than 60 wounded, including six children. yes, very unfortunately, very unfortunately, there is a beating. that the number of dead may increase, god forbid, of course, but, in the meantime , what are the russians doing? objects, and i am quoting pyaskov now, our soldiers do not strike at social objects and residential areas, they do not strike at the civilian population, unlike the kyiv regime, this is what they talk about on their airwaves, in their publications, and they are trying

... to convince their own population of this as well, which, of course, has no idea that it is possible to reach for information from some other sources, in addition to what is being said from moscow and from their center, well, meanwhile, the secretary of defense of the united states, lloyd austin has opened another rabstein, so we are extremely waiting for good ones the news from there, although there were some not too pleasant warnings, they say that the united states may try to transfer part of this uh... provision to its allies from the european union, well, but we will be grateful for any help, the main thing is to quickly and in a timely manner, well for today , oksana and i are gradually saying goodbye to you, have a peaceful and safe evening, support the armed forces of ukraine, do not ignore the air warning signals and be sure to stay with espress. good evening, we are from ukraine. congratulations

you, dear tv viewers, on the air of the tv channel, studio zahid program, we will analyze the most important events of this week, in particular , the consequences of the davos forum, in particular for ukraine. we will also analyze an extremely dangerous signal from the kremlin, in particular, former russian president medvedev said that russia will wage war not only against the ukrainian state, but against what is called ukrainianism. matthew bryza and mark fagin talk about it on our broadcast. and now mark fagin will work on the air of the tv channel, a member of the russian opposition in exile, a former member of the state duma, a famous video blogger. glory to ukraine, mark, congratulations. glory to the hero, i congratulate anton, i congratulate all the viewers. well, i would not like to work as a psychoanalyst for medvedev, but he gave an extremely harsh, boorish and dangerous signal. well, the key story here is how seriously we should interpret the writing...

medvedev, i don't know if he is from bodun or not , but in any case he described the situation as the preparation of the russian federation for the so-called existential war with ukraine. it is not the first time that he gives out something similar and even more dekun, let me remind you, recently in connection with the visit of the prime minister of great britain irisha sunyk, he gave out a little unpreparedness for war under certain circumstances, not to mention the shelling of belgorod and the like. so from a personal point of view, this is not a fully representative opinion of the russian authorities. but medvedev is, after all, the deputy chairman of putin's security council, he is a former clone, but the president of the russian federation, so his words... do not even have to be taken more seriously: firstly, no one knows him stops the kremlin, does not refute his words, he is officially a person, not some ordinary propagandist. therefore, it is possible that medvedev conveys the atmosphere of the mood that prevails in the security council in the kremlin, because he is allowed

to make such a presentation. presumably, they use it to test, provoke, check the reaction that may be to such statements. quite infernal, but it is interesting for the kremlin, they like to play this kind of game, such a silly game. and what is valuable and important here, because putin himself two days ago said things no less dekun. he said that fools do not want to negotiate with us. everyone has heard these quotes that everything would have ended a long time ago, you yourself understand, this is his direct quote: we will not give back any captured territories, not even about... putin also spoke about the baltic countries, which are expelling some agents of moscow under threat of national security. he justified this by saying that

they would protect the russian-speaking population in the same way as in ukraine, alluding to the war in the baltic states. i would say that although not in form, but in content, what it declares. can we expect more from them, for example, the use of nuclear weapons? it is always a story that has a crazy explanation, but who said that the kremlin is not rational in its behavior, and cannot allow for itself exactly such a course of events. therefore , it is worth listening to such words, you need to study them despite the worthless source from which they come, because medvedev's certain sentiments are, after all, transmitted from the kremlin. the existential war for existence is already a question of interpretations, because today, too, the question arose without

the use of unconventional means precisely about a threat to the existence of ukraine itself. actually, this is what the kremlin is trying to achieve, so it is impossible to imagine. to any promises regarding negotiations, because the goal of negotiations with moscow is not to consolidate the status quo, compromises, etc., but capitulation, that is , the destruction of ukraine as a subject of international law, as a sovereign state, as an independent nation, there should be no illusions, no there should be naive expectations on this issue that moscow is ready to stop at something. no, medviev said, we will never break away from ukraine, it's me. i read it in ukrainian translated, this is stated by the official of the country, which is a permanent member of the security council with the right of veto, the country, the founder of the un, which actually guarantees, as one of the five states, international security all over the world, on a planetary scale. this should be perceived as

the real position of the kremlin and its residents. well, the key story, as now, how relevant the so-called collective action will be, that's what we heard. several extremely important speeches, in particular at the davos forum. yes, we understand that french president emmanuel macron also signaled in particular, it is about supplying us with additional scalp missiles. yes, and we understand that they have served their time extremely well. we understand that there is a question about money and about a joint strategy, but the key story is how seriously the west is involved in what is called the military deterrence of the kremlin, or so to speak. we are moving in a certain palliative way, that is, the kremlin will constantly increase the production of weapons, if not by itself, then it will borrow them from the chinese or korean republics, well, when i talk about korean, it is about north korea and so on and so forth. starting from the autumn, but

really from the end of the winter of 2023, the situation began to change, because the american administration began to behave more cautiously. she also verbally supports ukraine, but to tell the truth, this delay in the allocation of 60 billion for ukraine and the disputes between republicans and democrats suggest the worst thoughts. in contrast to this, europe , on the contrary, has somehow become radicalized, not only by macron, but also by scholz, and some persons from the german leadership, despite the decision of the bundestag that to retain and not provide taurus missiles to ukraine. in addition, they generally take a fairly clear position and publicly articulate it. on the other hand, in america, as we can see, the strong influence of the presidential election campaign, which is already underway and ends in november 2024. how it affects the issues of support for ukraine,

military aid, the position of ukraine and the west in front of washington as a leader of the western world, is directly affected, even by the biden administration in contrast to the republicans behave much more cautiously. there is information bloomberg that the widow sullivan will convey the position of the white house. it is necessary to move into a positional stage, a defensive position for ukraine. as we understand it, until november 2024, it will not be decided who will be the owner of the oval office for the next four years. it is a strange position for the simple reason that this is exactly what moscow seeks, so that behind this positional defense, a change in tactics and strategy, to give it a break, to give it an opportunity to accumulate strength, and then surely no sullivan will stop it from offensive actions, not to mention that there is no plan b. well, ukraine and without this, it will create defense structures and mine it as necessary to protect the

80% of the territory that remains behind kyiv. but the question is different: what if trump wins the election? a rhetorical question. is sullivan and the biden administration offering some kind of plan in case that happens? maybe if trump comes, this is my point of view, maybe it's better to satiate ukraine as soon as possible. and weapons, so that for some time, until trump comes to power after the inauguration in january 2025, she could fight at least this year normally. yes, with the support of european states, with financing, with those funds that european countries, in particular france, with their scalps and other countries, can provide, but funds are needed in any case. there are many questions, many of which we will hear the answer to when the senate does erupt... the question of whether the issue of the allocation of this ill-fated $60 billion will be resolved,

then we will understand whether the american establishment is ready, as before, during these two years, to support ukraine in its defense sovereignty in this war with russia, that is the question. mark, well, you have very clearly outlined , so to speak, two speeds, at least two or three geopolitical speeds. on the one hand, we understand that the kremlin is counting on the american election campaign, we understand that it will be far, far from simple, to put it mildly, that is, scenarios of certain cannibalism are already beginning there. we understand that the kremlin is counting on a series of elections in the countries of the european union, on general fatigue, so we remember the speech of this extremely strange provocateur of the slovak deputy to the european parliament, yes, which started talking about the brothers of the slavs and so on and so on. to put up with, so we have corresponding certain scenarios that

the kremlin is very clearly counting on, in particular, when it comes to its preparation for various, possibly global things, the president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi recently said about global threats. if you try to put it all into a single concept, what you see now, for example, is the medium-term and short-term movements on the part of the kremlin and in general. i don't know how we will properly build our international communication, first of all, trump himself adds to the fire by saying that he would agree with putin that putin is a normal dude, evaluates him in a business sense, and this is taking into account the primer svavi, where he received 51%, but this is a dangerous signal, that is , he continues, despite situation to publicly voice their complementary attitude towards putin. he does not try to silence this issue. avoid him during the election campaign? no, he clearly marks it. why

is it important, if suddenly he wins the election, he will say: "listen, i don't deceived, dear voters and partners of the usa." i said during the election campaign about my position that i would agree with putin, that we would agree normally, divide everything and solve it. he is certainly not going to agree on these illusions. he maximizes the result , demands capitulation. the other question is, is he capable of doing this? as he himself, he himself says, i would agree on this, but on what terms to give 20%, and 80%, you agreed, good with putin, agreed, offered this plan to ukraine, and 80% remain sovereign, they go to nato, to the eu. here it seems to me, there are a lot of illusions, maybe trump

thinks that he is just spraying, here is your share of profits, here is mine, he thinks like a developer. he does not cease to be them, even despite the previous first term from 2016 to 2020, in which he was the president of the united states. i always like the criticism of trumpists, who say: "oh, poor trump, they don't give him anywhere." they are being persecuted everywhere, but he has not only served the term of the president for four years, he is going to sit it again, and i do not see that they are already persecuting him so kindly, preventing him from participating in the election campaign. company, at least in the nomination for the candidacy from the republican party. therefore , in this difficult situation, after all, in ukraine, kyiv needs to act bolder, try to work with the american establishment, trump's entourage, at least find out finally what strategy you plan to follow? yes, trump will determine a lot, but he will rely on the congressional majority, which

for now will be republican in the house of representatives, in particular. and what is the us strategy in in case of a change of power? at the very least, it would be desirable to receive guarantees from the republican establishment, even trump's entourage, that nothing will fundamentally change strategically, that ukraine will be supported in the war with moscow, this is on the one hand. on the other hand, it is necessary to realistically assess the situation, no matter who is the candidate from the republican party, i don't know what will change for biden's chances today, many things can change, they are small at the moment, for today it should be possible. well, we have a year together with the administration biden, and the key story is how to use this time right now, well, in particular , it is about resources, and on the other hand, i would like to be able to feel what the kremlin is capable of now. we understand that the kremlin can threaten, but the question of the threat, the question of real ability, is

a little different. the main thing you can get from biden right now is, of course, that you need to... continue to fight for these 60 billion, try to convince both republicans and democrats that they are necessary, you need to achieve in the summer at the nato summit, which will be hosted by washington and biden, the 75-year anniversary summit of nato, so that the invitation to join nato was given to ukraine. this is the best guarantee of safety and the rest. yes, it's a process, it's not in one hundred days. there will still be a discussion within nato, and maybe it will be for another year to make some decisions regarding the admission of ukraine to nato? but this will be compensation for the fact that the democrats may lose power and the situation may change radically. membership in nato and coverage by the north atlantic treaty of the alliance is, after all, compensation for all the

problems that are already visible, at least until november 2024. it seems fundamental to me. a key moment, if biden does not dare to do this, and this is a historic decision. we realize that the chances of a person in his nineties to stay for another four years are illusory, not zero, but not obvious. maybe something else will change radically, and of course it would be some kind of compensation, the creation of certain guarantees that this tool will help ukraine defend itself in the coming months, or even years. mark, and putin what will happen in the current situation? what putin can do, what putin can do and what he can do, well, i don’t know, due to a lack of resources or certain fears, what can be implemented is not just some bashkartostan scenario, but some additional one, well, we understand how they react very, very much to something like this, it is not even hidden, putin is waiting for the elections, he

says that the armed forces failed the counteroffensive, the entire initiative is in the hands of the russian troops, this is stated publicly, that is, he does not... give up hope that some of the offensive operations will end in success, for example, marginka, although this is a very specific operation, when russian troops entered a completely destroyed settlement. besides, look, because they tried to advance on avdiivka. more than two months, no result. before that , there was a very acute situation with kupyansk. kupyansk is a junction, the road to kharkiv opens. i was in those places, i had the opportunity to see everything directly. it is difficult for me to imagine how much effort and resources need to be spent to take kupyansk. i suspect that in avdiytsia also, i have not been there, i really wanted to visit , but i suspect that it is not too easy there either, in the area of ​​​​the coke plant, you will put another

1040 people to take it all, a pyrrhic victory, maybe it has a political connotation, he needs to march 17 to show at least something before the elections. this is not to win the elections, it is clear that there are no elections, he is simply drawn by these 80-85%. and it is important for him to control public opinion, that everything is not in vain, look, yes, we are fighting, we are slowly advancing, we want something and occupy, but all the sacrifices are not in vain, all the costs are not in vain, we achieve some incredible geopolitical success in the long run, protecting our defense capability and the like. so putin, of course, despite his wait-and-see attitude , is definitely preparing and will start some offensive actions on...

shoot at his residence, kill someone from his entourage, and no one will be left hanging, as it was in february 2022. it is much easier for the ukrainian special services to carry out punitive or subversive actions there. just kill prominent generals or responsible persons from the belarusian leadership for such. who will admit the next bucho and oboroshenka is much easier. that's the thing. therefore, i believe that everything will be much more difficult there, even if it happens, lukashenka will not be asked. mark, and an intimate, delicate question,

i would not like to spread conspiracy theories, but oleksiy restovych and his strange interview, strange conversation with latinina, i watched this case and my eyes became much bigger than in latinina behind glasses, yes even she i couldn't stand it anymore, oleksiy started to turn something into a fan that simply does not fit into the concept in general, but you , as a person who has worked with him for more than one hour on the air, so i think you read oleksiy himself very well, in general i wanted i would like to ask you what is happening with him now , in your opinion, when i am asked this question, i always answer for the period when he was on my airwaves, then there were also some jams, but this is not what is happening. now, for the whole year and a half, it was possible to make claims that he said something wrong, wrong babbled, but still it was in the context of the general position, the public opinion of ukraine,

the majority, at least. fluctuations within the so-called general geopolitical policy of the pro-ukrainian party. in general, yes, you can review all these aters, they are there, what happened to them, what happened to him next, i said. when many people criticized me for the fact that i stopped doing programs with him, the first alarms began already in the summer, they scared and alarmed me a lot, because arestovych declared that he had political ambitions, that he wanted to become the president i do not understand how you can become president without presidential elections, they would not have been foreseen, what a person relied on, he openly declares this, it is not a secret of polichenelli. i think it's a lot. according to the advantages, it was dictated by this: i will criticize the government and thereby earn points for my election campaign, and i will have something from it. i saw it that way, and now

it cannot be explained, because the position is strange, then he and putin want to sue europe and the west, then lukashenko praises how a great patriot of his country, then i'm sorry, he says: eh, no, everything was wrong, then i scared you, and now i stop scaring you and return to another, previous position. in fact, i don't know, i haven't communicated with him since august 2023, many accuse him of a pro-moscow position, and almost of ties with the kremlin or even the fsb, i don't know, but i want to say that if you chose such a position, then you need to be in ukraine, in kyiv, at least without saying that... you need to take such a position inside ukraine, it is correct, after all, if you pronounce it at home, then trust in you is higher, that is, a person sees that

this is the way it should be. border, it looks somewhat unconvincing, to put it mildly: if you have such a position, then be kind, when you are already applying for the position of the president of ukraine or a ukrainian politician, you have to do it all at home. if you feel a danger to yourself, then this also explains a lot. why such a change in views occurred, because the question is not that the authorities do not like this position. and why were you an adviser to the president before that, just from february has the war started? the head of the office, something like that was written in the certificate on public grounds, he was a part-time employee, you voiced one position, then another position began in 2023, it is somewhat frightening and it is strange, you either said something that was not true at the time, although he did not say anything so doubtful then, let it be two or three weeks already. but

this has already become a balanced assessment, his personal opinion. now he says: zelensky is corrupt and a dictator. and why didn't you say about it earlier? you saw it when you were in the president's office worked why was he silent then? and this, in your opinion, marko, is it psychology or political technology, what is working in it now, well, i understand that this is a question, you know, up to your intuition. i think the first is here. some attempt to manipulate, aristovych doesn't hide it, he says openly, i don't see a political position here, he has gone through various stages in his biography, it seemed to me that a person has become wiser, there is a little until 50 years left, a year or two, you need to have some consistent position , i am a person who has never changed his position, for which i have everything life was criticized, i was single-minded all my life and always appreciated it in others, principledness, when a person has the same position, adheres to the same

views. this does not mean that you cannot criticize, change your attitude towards people , but in the main issues you need to remain who you are, it is impossible if you are a supporter of liberal ideology to become a communist, for me it is nonsense, as well as changing your views, depending on your state, whether you are in power or not, and why did you go there, you were at public meetings, it seems to me that there is some oleksiy aristovych has a psychological defect, whether something was added to him or he thinks... that he was underestimated, in my opinion, there is something personal here. thank you very much, mark, for this frank and extremely interesting conversation, i would like to remind our viewers that mark fegin, an activist of the russian emigration in exile, a former member of the state duma of the russian federation and a well-known blogger, was speaking on espress air. thanks mark. thank you, everyone, all the best.