them for exchange is the responsibility of the country that holds them. ukraine, for its part, took all measures to ensure that yesterday's exchange took place. civilian transport with russian prisoners was in place, this is the sumy direction. everything was ready for the exchange, the relevant services were alerted, and silence was ensured on the route. border guards, security and defense forces all worked properly. last time, on january 3, when ukraine returned 230 of its defenders, russia also used air transport. for moving our prisoners, but then it was ukraine was warned in advance and there was a request to ensure a regime of silence, because ukrainian prisoners of war were boarding. of course, ukraine complied with this, and the exchange was successfully implemented, regarding yesterday's events, no such information was received from the aggressor either verbally or in writing. according to the russians themselves, they use military aircraft to transport ukrainian prisoners. il-76. a military aircraft with a twin anti-

aircraft gun on the tail, it was i who was quoting a representative of the headquarters intelligence of the ministry of defense of ukraine andriy yusov on the air of the national news telethon. well, i will also add that yusov said even earlier, in fact also in the commentary of radio svoboda this morning, that there were supposed to be some vipers on board this plane, and there are only five such bodies in the belgorod morgue. the information is now in the possession of the main intelligence department and says that there should have been several official vips from the military and political representation of the aggressor state on board, their names are known and the named materials will be provided as part of the international investigation, and says that at the last moment, for some reason, the fsb actually ordered them not to get on this board and , using other modes of transport, these people actually did not get on there, and this information was already found out after how this event...

took place, and now we are adding victoria oliynyk, the parliamentary analyst of the chesno movement, to our marathon. glory to ukraine, mrs. victoria, we congratulate you. glory to the heroes, good day. well, movement research is honest. in the 23rd in 2018 , the request for an open register of electronic declarations of public servants gained the most support on the website of the president of ukraine. the petition from dmytro kotsyubail, a soldier of the vovka devincha battalion, oleksandr yabchanka received more than 83 votes. this became a record. since the introduction of electronic petitions on the website of the head of state, well, in general, the 23rd year has become a record for the number of petitions that received more than 25 thousand necessary votes, we would like to ask you about certain trends, whether all petitions considered, if not considered, then what and in general, what could be the reasons for this case. as you have already noted, this year we have a record number of petitions that have reached no. 2,500 signatures, if last year

, that is, on the 22nd, we had 150 such petitions, then in the 23rd year, about 1,200 petitions, that is, this is a huge , colossal difference, and here we are talking about the fact that people began to use the petition tool much more massively, well and , of course, we are talking about the fact that the attention to bring this or that petition to the final, to the solution is much stronger than it was before, and if we are talking about the response, here it is ... the situation is more interesting, because as of january 4, that is, for the 24th year, the president has responded to only 10% of the petitions that have been collected the required number of votes, that is, we have an answer to only 150 petitions out of about 1,200, that is, we still understand that there are certain problems with the consideration of the petition, and a significant number of people are still waiting for an answer. ms. victoria, we also want to remind you that the petition is against the blackout. of the fifth channel and

direct also received the necessary 25 thousand votes for consideration on july 1, 22, although users complained massively about problems when signing this petition, nevertheless , it received its votes, but the channels are still disconnected from the digital air on t2, and we understand that actually about what you said, that only 10% are satisfied, and 90% are not satisfied, and we would actually like to ask... also about what exactly are the topics of these petitions, on which topics are petitions most often created, because well, personally, i can, from my personal observations to say that a lot of petitions on the president's website refer to the posthumous awarding of one or another title to heroes who fought at the front, and we would also like to ask what else besides this topic, because we understand that every military man who is currently defending our state deserves for the title of hero of ukraine,

what other topics concern ukrainians and what topics do they actually register their appeals for? and the topic that is the most massive, i.e. half of all registered petitions and 70. of petitions that have reached the required number votes, this is a question of awarding, that is , it is exactly what you mentioned, about granting the status of hero of ukraine, to fallen servicemen or servicemen who are still at the front and continue to protect our state, and we understand that this topic is a top topic. in second place, we have a category that has no topic, that is, here people have not chosen the topic of their petition, but very often these petitions are also about the award itself. well, the third topic is the issue of turnover, there are a lot of different topics, in particular the issue of mobilization, demobilization, the purchase of some weapons, the development of drones, that is, we are talking about the fact that the war is at its peak, that is, it is a huge percentage of petitions that are supported and that

are registered, the vast majority, this is the very issue of the war and that it is necessary to reward our servicemen, well but still, it is difficult to say that petitions are... effective in this matter, because the award very rarely happens precisely because of petitions, if people still manage to get the necessary number of votes, then most likely the president will redirect this petition for consideration by the cabinet of ministers, the cabinet ministry of defense, well, as a result , only the author of the petition will know the final answer about whether the issue has really been resolved, publicly, it is no longer published, and therefore we cannot now sum up whether it really succeeded at least to people who already have an answer to their petition to receive this status , and was this entire procedure really carried out properly? ugh, look, ms. victoria, well , if in general there are those petitions that are actively supported, for example, by journalistic communities, or by these or those, for example, editions, yes, there are petitions, which

are actually not particularly worse, yes, but they disappear somewhere, and in general, maybe it would be worth adjusting our legislation in general, what... those electronic petitions? clearly, and in the legislation we have a question, because for example according to the law, the answer to the petition must be given within 10 days. we do not see this, well, in no case, because these are isolated situations when it is possible to get a response exactly 10 days after receiving signatures. we understand that even from 2019 there is only one petition is still pending and has no response. there is a true petition with the demand to thank petro poroshenko, that is, the president and the president. that there is no such direct call to action here, just a thank you, but still, contrary to the fact that there are 10 days for consideration, this petition is still hanging on the website, so there is definitely a need to revise the mechanism, revise the legislation and make these petitions more effective and effective, because not all

citizens consider them effective and not all citizens really use them, about for example, the results of a study that we conducted together with sociological organizations, well, it is very... but an interesting point, and if we talk about, well, for example, in the opinion of you, your colleagues, and people who were engaged in professional research in general on this institute, as electronic petitions, which would have to be introduced into the legislation and preferably as soon as possible, in order for it to work to the fullest, first of all, we are talking about the need to comply with the legislation that already exists, that is, the rules are already prescribed and they are not completely are performed, if not. there is a need to implement these rules, then there is a need to update them and make it so that people know for sure that at this very moment, at this particular time, in this mechanism, they will receive their answer, and of course we insist that we even have answers review, that is, there should be not only a public response that redirects

the question to some institution, the response should be public about the very process of solving this story, because so far we only see that, for example, the president redirected the story to the cabinet of ministers or the cabinet of ministers decided , only the author knows, and this does not allow people to evaluate the effectiveness of the petition, therefore the majority of citizens, i.e. about 70% according to our survey, believe that petitions are not completely effective and are little by little disappointed in this tool, about what as evidenced by the gradual decrease in the number of registered petitions over the past five years, we need to work on this, because it is almost the only tool of mass democracy available to us, when we can somehow... speak publicly with the authorities, actually, i just wanted to lead to this, because in the conditions when we have a full-scale war, in fact, people do not have so many methods of influencing the authorities and actually methods of expressing their own position, except for how to write petitions,

support them, support them, and actually in this way to convey to the authorities some wishes and actually proposals from society. thank you for analyzing this whole situation, victoria olina. the parliamentary analyst of the movement was honestly in touch with us, and now we will have literally a few minutes of pause, after which we will return to our studio. everyday life is now full of stress and anxiety, b6 melams will help you cope with these challenges. melatonin, magnesium and vitamin b6 contribute to a full rest and restore strength to b6 melams. full sleep and recovery from bhfz. there are discounts on amicitron of 20% in psyllanyk, pam and oskad pharmacies. oh, and we got wet, can you have some tea, mom, right? so what to do in order not to get sick? vitamin c, d3, zinc and, most importantly, quercitin to strengthen

blood vessels. just take quertin immuno. everything in one package. in one capsule, four components together. so simple, one capsule a day. so convenient. quertin immuno. bleeding and inflammation of the gums. my advice. lacal-active. lacal active actively overcomes bleeding gums. protects against periodontitis and visibly tightens. clear. lakalut aktiv - an action that you feel immediately. lacquer activ++ with two-phase technology and plus active ingredients for even more active protection . did spartak saturday lie to everyone? who? now my girlfriend will come there and her mother is also my girlfriend. grandma will be. let's play something. show your google search history. direct real search history. tuku, we are definitely playing, the election was 100% for lebigovych, i suggest to pee and

sleep, what, maybe i will look a little, wow, in general, yes, it is, supposedly the first sex in two years, new york in the 19th century, this luxury, scandals and intrigue, the gilded age from hbo. watch all seasons of the exquisite drama in ukrainian with a subscription, turn on aristocratic on mego. there are discounts on aquamaris of 15% in pharmacies psylansky, vam and oskad. hello, woman, what to do when there is a liver? alohol should be taken, but what for bile? alohol, it protects the liver and gall bladder. natural components of alochol contribute to the normalization of the liver and gall bladder, alochol with care and respect for the liver and gall bladder. great return of great lviv. from now on, the largest

talk format of ukraine, veliky lviv, will be broadcast in the evening prime time at 21:15. in general, i believe that we need two things: money and weapons. we did not start this war, but we must end it and we must to win recently, politicians who would be as brave as possible. and there are fewer and fewer decisive people in the world. we will not stop at anything if 30% of the deputy corps, as i say on a rotational basis, goes to war. the most important thing is that on thursday at the updated time of 21:15 velikiy lviv is speaking in the project. conversations, discussions, search for solutions, on the espresso tv channel. i'm here temporarily, i'll be back home soon.

live now where you are. well, exotic news arrived from the russian federation, where they sentenced their own terrorist girkin to four years in prison colony, girkin was found guilty of calling for extremism, yes, four years for girkin is nothing at all, but this is also a rather characteristic signal, that is, that putin does not spare even... his henchmen. like that! like that!

we will analyze more information with dmytro barkar, head of the analytics department of the institute of mass information. if there is an opportunity to connect and hear mr. dmytro, we will be grateful. mr. dmytro is with us. welcome to veteri espresso. good evening. congratulations to the audience, congratulations to the studio. so, the last ones the other day in the ukrainian network. the infographic was very actively promoted, which actually demonstrated the telling numbers , what we are talking about is the infographic of the analytical company toplit, which calculated that... for the money that went from the monetization of russian content on the territory of our state, the russian budget was paid about 5 million dollars, and with this money you can buy 10,000 fpv drones, which cost 500 hryvnias each, i would really like you to explain to people how this whole complicated

monetization story works, because at first the point of view of an average ukrainian who listens... to russian music on youtube or some other streaming platforms, or watches russian films, tv series and basically consumes any russian content, well, he may not understand how this whole story is connected, so what we have at the end of this story, at the end we have practically, well, the murder of ukrainians, and i want you to just somehow , you know, simply explain to people how it all works and actually, how we get to these conditional somewhere.. 10 thousand fpv drones, for which ukrainians paid for the fact, it is even difficult to explain it in a complicated way here, because it all works very simply, if you watch a video on youtube uploaded by a russian author, youtube directly then pays

the owner according to the number of views. in this video, in fact, wherever it is, but it is the owner, youtube counts the number of views, pays the funds, everything is very simple, approximately the same thing happens on other platforms, one or another calculation algorithm, but there may be different rates, different amount of funds, but all very much just who... who uploaded, who is the owner of a video or audio file on this or that platform, if it is a platform that is legal, actually and with illegal ones, the same with pirated services, approximately the same scheme, funds, then the owner of the platform counted the number of views and for each view paid the owner of that video or

audio file, that's all and it's clear that... if it's in russian, not even in russian, but even on some international platform, on on any platform, but the owner is a citizen russia, then he receives these funds, and he will pay taxes from these funds, the funds will enter the budget of russia, and the war will be paid for with these funds. a very simple scheme, there is not even a complicated method here. to explain, mr. dmytro, but do you understand what, if there is a nuance, people really perceive it very simply, and they do not understand one more point, when, for example, a person watches a video on youtube, there is no premium youtube, so he does not has conditional subscriptions, but just ordinary youtube, and she says: well, look, well, i don’t pay anything, i just opened youtube,

i found something in the search engine that i need and look there... this or that content, in fact, and i, for example, understand that this actually helps people earn money, for example, people who do not have youtube premium, yes, they, respectively, before the video, and in the process of watching the video, they see certain commercials, respectively , youtube pays the owners of this content for this, and i wanted you to explain it more broadly, because a lot of people in think that if they don't pay anything... who to watch this content, then they believe that the owner of this content also somehow cannot earn from this content, well, because i did not pay him anything, well, then let's figure out what advertising is and why it costs money, because the viewer pays with his time, his attention for

ad views and each view also has a cost and... the advertiser pays for his ad he pays youtube himself or some other platform to place his commercial, each view will increase the amount of the cost of that ad, these the funds will go to youtube, which youtube will then pay for views of allegedly free content that we er. let's see if we can watch and it would be better not to watch if he is toxic russian and a priori is harmful for us, again, it is very difficult for me, how... to add arguments to this due to their obviousness and simplicity, that is, if the viewer does not pays his money directly from

his pocket, then he pays with his time, his attention for advertising, helps earn money for the advertiser, and then these funds will be redirected to pay for the content that it seems free to you, so directly: the viewer does not pay, but at the same time, with each of his views, he helps the owner of this video earn money. mr. dmytro, look, well , we have great respect for the institute of mass information, it is an organization with a reputation and history, yes, and accordingly, i am more than sure that you have analyzed what content ukrainians watch, yes, and accordingly, to what certain conclusions can lead us, when we... talk about russian content, first of all, when we talk about russian content, as if if we talk about such platforms as

youtube or some other more or less entertainment services, social networks, some tiktok, then mostly usually entertaining content is consumed, which at first glance may seem like it. eh easy eh and eh, as they say, eh, outside of politics, supposedly, eh , prevail, well, such views, at the same time, at the same time, ah, we should not forget that , which is always russian, any light or entertaining content can be saturated, ah, between the lines even in jokes, in some... hidden messages, it can to be saturated with advertising, or rather, propaganda, of the same russian world, with messages

regarding the devaluation of ukrainians themselves, or any other peoples that are characteristic of russians, besides, if we talk about social networks, there can be a lot... even at the everyday level , but false fake information, or fakes, let’s say, in the context of political content, therefore, although it is consumed mainly from ukraine, if we talk about the consumption of russian content from ukraine, it is mainly about entertainment content, however, it cannot be considered entirely safe in view of the above , in fact, the fact that it is often saturated with propaganda, plus, again, returning

to the first question, in this way we will help russia earn funds that pay for the actual killing of us. mr. dmytro, by the way, i would like to draw your attention to the scandalous russian series that came out, it seems in the 23rd year, the boy's word about this one. the series has already been talked about, it seems to me, for a very long time that it, well, first of all, that in this way we monetize the profits of the russians, when we watch it, it's the first story, and the second story is what this series is about, it's about gangsterism, and actually, it doesn't bring anything good, but this infection, forgive me for my words, it has eaten into the minds of our teenagers very much , and we have a serious problem with this, and i would like you to actually, well, also explain about the reason. this one, i don’t know, not that there is a precedent, well, probably that there is a precedent, because during the full-scale invasion of such a surge in popularity, probably none of the russian series or

there were no films in ukraine, at least, yes , that’s right, the series is actually aimed, well, practically at teenagers, at the younger generation, and here, well , there are several levels of this problem in terms of... firstly, precisely for such an audience, especially ukraine on today it cannot offer, or rather, it could probably offer content, but in fact it does not exist, it is for this audience, if there is some already ukrainian, let's say, humor on youtube, then , unfortunately, there is no such thing at the level of cinema , and the curiosity... of young people to to to such films, it is explained very simply: in adolescence, one gravitates to the extreme, gravitates

to... even to muscularity, to brawling, and that is why such films about banditry find their audience, instead, quite theoretically , ukraine could offer an alternative, because we have so extreme, well, there is a ground for creating such on the verge of extreme, muscular product. we have a war, we have soldiers, we have heroes, and we could very well find a realistic product that is close to the minds and souls of young ukrainians, it remains the only thing is to understand it, to create it, and then, then, probably, it will kill, at least

subside, interest in such a... russian product, but unfortunately, today it is difficult to tell a teenage audience that i will download a media product , or maybe we are not finalizing it somewhere, well, we understand, yes, if the enemy can flash something with which he can lure or captivate our audience, maybe we need to somehow rethink the information product for which funds from our state budget go, we have about one and a half minutes, in a certain way it is necessary to rethink, because it's really just like... if there is any product for children, there is one for older people, but for the youngest, for teenagers there is no practical product that would be interesting, and there is none, and it is desirable , that there would be one that would be both interesting and have some kind of educational component in it, developing, it would be ideal, so here it is necessary to rethink what concerns public funds, and to some

extent, some private ones, not only. we are shooting a movie with state funds, we completely agree with you, thank you for it an interesting conversation, dmytro barkar , the head of the analytics department of the institute of mass information, was in touch with us, well, i see that we need to somehow rethink from the other side, in order to shoot an interesting movie for teenagers, or in general to publish some interesting information product for teenagers, it is necessary to understand very well what teenagers want, teenagers do not always want what fits in, so to speak, in the generally voiced trend, there is patriotism. political and some other correctness and so on, that's why, that's why the enemy can try to lure in your informative, right? well, i actually wanted to say about this that it is necessary to simply create content for different tastes so that there is even an alternative to not quite, let's say, high-quality in my opinion, but this is my subjective opinion, high-quality russian content should mean to be not very high-quality ukrainian content that will displace russian content, that is, it is necessary

to give this niche anyway. something similar to the word boy was removed with state funds, well, there would be such criticism, well, it is difficult to please our people, that is a fact, but today we already we finish our studio with antiyn, 3 hours have already passed imperceptibly, so we pass the word to our colleagues, well, we'll see each other tomorrow. greetings viewers of espresso, anna yavomelnyk is with you and it's time to learn about the most current events. the guided air missile kh-59 was destroyed in the sky over the mykolaiv region,

the air command of the south notified. russians