such unity and such a government would then allow our western partners to say that we have a united power, we are united by one goal, we are on our way to victory, i hope that it will be so. let's go back to our foreign policy events and results this week, because russia has been quite active over the past few weeks. niv used the site of the un security council in order to prove that ukraine is a terrorist country, a country that kills, a country that shoots down planes. first, it was a story about a bazaar that was shelled in donetsk by russian troops, and they blamed ukraine, the first case and the second case when the plane crashed.

il-76 in belgorod oblast and in the first and second cases, serhii lavrov, who is at the united nations, was one of those who tried to declare that the ukrainians do not need to provide weapons, because you see, they are not using them for appointment, how do you assess what happened in the un security council, and in general. at the un in the context of lavov himself coming there, in the context of the fact that russia is constantly trying to take this high podium in the world to use in our country, despite the fact that most countries, obviously, or representatives of countries still understand that the war in ukraine was started by russia, not ukraine? well, two questions, first, regarding the un tribune. well, obviously legally, and everyone knows that.

it has been proven that russia actually seized the place of the former soviet union, including using it in the security council, as a lawmaker. and well, the ukrainian side regularly raises this story at all meetings, but there is no decision, by the way, there is still no decision regarding the restriction of the right species well, here we are unlikely to achieve anything fast, i think that the situation will remain like this, or are we better off? not to be a participant in all the processes in this situation, so far yes, but you are really right, now the second part, the russians often use this participation for propaganda, i will tell you that at other meetings of the security council, they sometimes state things that are completely contradictory because they built, built, in relation to ukraine, in relation to ukraine, they built a false scheme, it is based on many.

volatile, and this can be proven with facts, and this the members of the security council already know, everyone, well , some pay attention to this, some just want to keep silent, but everyone knows very well that, for example, at the security council, dedicated to the problem of the middle east, russia did not block the decision to strike the united states with 100 missiles, including with tamahawks, on those missiles of the houthis, you remember, in no way... russia did not block, only one remark they wanted to make there, that it does not apply, or rather, to drag this palestinian solution into the palestinian question, this is the first, and the second and the most important, that the same rule that they supported at that meeting cannot be applied in the black sea, by the way, china supported them in this, what is possible and not possible in other points, so what they do, and they have in no way denied the right. the us responded, and it was

done very quickly. at our own meetings , i mean, devoted to the issues of the russian-ukrainian war, whether they are convened by russia or ukraine, the position remains unchanged, the kremlin paper that they receive is read, often very read, and it is visible, sometimes at the last moment, and it is simply read out. i think that this is already a roach, she got everyone, well, actually. it can be seen from those countries that just listen to it every now and then, and, unfortunately, the situation that they sang about the latest situation, the press conference of the head of their foreign policy department, means what you asked, and i i listened, i was just wondering what questions the journalists were asking, there was nothing new there, what new did i hear the explanation. what worries

everyone now, that russia is really showing some kind of moments of readiness or preparation for a possible attack on a nato country or provocation. and they began to deny it so often that it convinces me more and more that they will prepare it, so lavrov spoke according to freud, when asked if this was planned, he said, you understand, well, no from any point of view political, not economic, none, we do not plan and it makes no sense for us to attack a nato country, and we will not attack, and continue, now it is interesting, we and the svo. this, they call the war against ukraine, special military operation, we didn’t want to do that either, but the nato countries, that is, it was clearly said that in principle they are comparing it and it could be the same, so they also have this issue

, which is being recently discussed, they convened there discussion, well, first of all, no one believes, the same lavrov at the press conference to the question... regarding the plane that was there on russian territory, very close to military operations, why did it end up there, well , it is a military plane, and actually, well, that's why he ended up there very close to the means of destruction of various russian and ukrainian ones, i.e. , civil aviation flights are prohibited in this zone, this is a purely military aircraft, and its type is to destroy transport, which is mechanical, there is no difference, none in principle, it is... assigned to a military regiment, it performs military tasks, this is a fact that cannot be denied. next, the fact that i can say, and this is a fact: russia does not let international investigators into this disaster, that is, it does not. how quickly they

wanted to beat all this, as lavrov says, you believe us, you just believe us, simple believe me, that’s all, and they are told, and what kind of international investigation will be, they say... no, no, i think that lavov has not yet been instructed by the kremlin, and the kremlin has already said no international investigation, this is the first, second, you are declaring about civilians or prisoners of war of the dead , first of all, you did a lot of things, if you , well, suddenly you allowed such transportation, this is a violation of the rules of war, that is, it is clear, but they do not even give the international red cross access to... none of these prisoners are included in these lists, thus, this is a fact, one more fact, these are the facts that have been proven, everything else still needs an international investigation, and while there is no such investigation, it

is impossible to draw conclusions, moreover, this investigation should be about precisely the violation of the rules of war, not about the one who fired at this plane, because it was us... there should be russian friendly fire, that is, not in relation to this, but in relation to violations of the rules of war, and the investigation should be with the admission of all expertise, everything, because these days, you know, they can use, we already saw it when mh17 got lost, we eat, this is a civilian plane, they wanted so much to hide the fact that a russian beech was used, rososiy, imported from russia, they so wanted to hide that in... pause, they even got to the point that all of them, well, were photographed first against the background of the bodies of the dead, and then it was all cleaned up, and only then they allowed, well, if there were other explanations, and we, the ukrainian side, immediately demanded the admission of international experts, that is, we opened

all the cards at once, even frankly, in a situation where, well maybe not everything was clear yet, but they definitely said yes, international investigation, so... until i see the data of the international investigation, in no way any comment from russia, neither lavrov, nor putin, i do not accept, because i heard so many lies from them, during the war, you know that lies are a tool war well, the united states of america accuses russia of trying to shift responsibility for the consequences of the war unleashed by the kremlin on ukraine, due to the haste with which the russian delegation convened the un security council after the fall. il-76 in the belgorod region, the deputy permanent representative of the united states said united states prion ambassador robert wood, what he said: russia's haste to convene a meeting of the council fully corresponds to the model from the russian textbook, with which we are all familiar.

the russian federation has repeatedly tried to shift the responsibility for the tragedies of the senseless war of choice onto others, as if it were the victim and not the aggressor, noted the president. of american diplomacy, well, on the background of this, another message appeared that putin is sending signals to the united states of america about readiness. regarding the negotiations, regarding the war in ukraine, you are sure, mr. valery, read this news from bloomberg, i don't know how much you can trust what bloomberg writes, but they say that through indirect contacts, president putin has sent a signal to the united states of america that he is open to negotiations regarding ukraine. in particular, putin is allegedly ready not to object to possible membership of ukraine in nato in exchange for consolidation. of russian control over the territories

of ukraine occupied in recent years. hints that russia is open to negotiations, even if they are not sincere, could help sow a rift among ukraine's allies, isolating kyiv and undermining president zelenskyi's efforts to win support for his own peace formula that calls for russia's complete withdrawal. so what is behind the signals is not even putin's, but the signals that appear. wildly in the press about moscow's signals, well, they are not only hidden , they are open, they do not publicly state that they want to stop active actions as soon as possible, because they, well, we are obviously in a difficult situation, and they there are also serious problems, they need some period... to restore their capabilities, there our armed forces and defense forces have halved, at least theirs, well, the army

and both on the black sea and on sukhodol, that is , it is clear that they are not delighted that their supplies are now being stopped, especially not delighted with putin's entourage, who are making money from it, stuapse supplies, supplies from transshipment there near leningrad or st. petersburg. that is , it is clear that they want a pause, which, by the way, they want to use to know withdrawal including sanctions, so in principle it sounds like we are ready as soon as possible, only on our conditions, the conditions they announced, in short, the capitulation of ukraine, that is , the conditions are such and that's all, that is, what is the readiness for negotiations, the peace formula , which is offered by the ukrainian side, they generally reject... absolutely, one more point , the mediators offered them, you know that in

switzerland, the president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyy stated that switzerland is ready and offered to hold a summit on the peace formula this year, and switzerland too officially declared that they do not see it or see it only with the participation of the russian side, they officially appealed precisely in new york, to which lavrov responded. immediately publicly said that russia does not agree to this, that is, he clearly stated that russia does not want negotiations, even on an official basis on the proposal of switzerland, so what does this mean, such things are generally not discussed publicly, are not discussed, if the swiss offered him, he immediately sorry for the word at the press conference, first of all, he made a fool of himself, well, the swiss in fact, this initiative, now i don’t know , it must already be clear that with russia there... nothing will happen, so i absolutely do not see any readiness of russia to stop the war, and the fact

that missiles are flying, strikes are flying at kharkov, strikes in ukrainian cities, this is simply a confirmation of this, therefore it is absolutely not serious to talk about anything now, negotiations are possible only if our negotiating position is strengthened, ours, i mean ukrainian with the help and support of partners, and when.. .... russian the party will be forced to take some steps, but i will tell you my position, it is different, i generally believe that the negotiations should go only with regard to the exchange of prisoners, the exchange, well, unfortunately, of the bodies of the dead, go with regard to, well, all these moments that arise during the war, in no way yet with this regime can you sign any, any, well... on the go or something like that, and maybe de facto it is somehow mediated by the usa, maybe somehow

the usa in the first place, maybe somehow it will be transferred from one type of war to another, to another confrontation, but i warn immediately and for the future, there can be no direct ukraine-russia negotiations with putin, that is, this will be our very losing position in any case, and our leadership knows this, so our... position is always is open, withdraw your troops from our territory, and then we can decide something, and yes, when you kill our people, continue the war, and... offer ukraine to surrender, then how can you come to such things in any option, and what appears will always be to appear, but, mr. valery, if russia wants negotiations regarding ukraine, then it is not about the fact that they want to participate in the meeting, about zelenskyi's peace formula and not about direct negotiations with zelenskyi, they

want negotiations with by the united states of america, or with the representatives of the northern alliance, as they declared it in december 21, when putin's ultimatum was known, as to what the future architecture of influence in the world should look like, and look, yes, you are right, by the way, very right moment, they responded with war, they gave an ultimatum in the 21st year, what you said, officially in letters the usa and nato received ultimatums, that is, withdraw. there are troops from the territory of the country that joined nato after 1996, that is , the ultimatum was nato and the usa, and then, when neither the usa nor nato complied, they did not comply with this ultimatum, whom they attacked, in them to the usa, i am surprising you, if i am not mistaken, the border in russia is 4.5 km, that is,

yes, it is in the strait, it is in alaska, well, if you take sukhadol, there is more. distance, but they are very close to the usa, they did not attack the usa, they are afraid of this collision, they and nato have not yet attacked, so far it may be, but they have attacked ukraine. the question is, why is ukraine here? so, in general, in this scheme, what does ukraine have to do with it? well, i don't want to go into details, it's their lying, well, just a cynical thing, when they see that they can't hit hard, because they get a war from a nuclear state, they hit a weak point, unfortunately,... unfortunately, they considered ukraine to be such, they were mistaken in many respects, but they did so. so now, without ukraine, this decision will not happen. it is impossible to solve now what was theoretically possible in the 21st year to speak, when there was not yet a large-scale invasion on the territory of ukraine. now that they have caused enormous damage to ukraine, when

they have violated territorial integrity and sovereignty even more, you are already without ukraine. there is no way to do it, even if, i remind you, in the 21st year there were a lot of russian troops concentrated in our borders, then, as you remember, there was a meeting in geneva between the presidents of the united states and the president of russia, yes , this is the desire, i i agree to sit down and decide, but how are you going to decide now, when it's russia bogged down in this, and ukraine is already a subject in this process, so any attempt is something. deciding without ukraine will end in failure. you mentioned the small distance between russia and the united states of america. well, it is obviously also about alaska, because this whole story can also unfold there, and medvedev tried to unfold this story this week, because putin signed a decree on the search abroad of real estate that

once belonged to the ussr and even the russian empire and the proper registration of this real estate after that, the united states the americans warned moscow about possible encroachments on american territory, and medvedev, the deputy head of the russian security council, wrote: according to the representative of the state department, russia is not getting back alaska, which was sold to the united states of america in the 19th century, so be it, but we expected that alaska from will return for a day, now war is inevitable. is medvedev trolling the americans now? considering how medvedev, putin, and russia in general are behaving, that you can expect anything from them. well, there were statements that, in my opinion, today, that texas is already standing on the eve of war there with other states, with the federal government. that is, well, you know, i think so, first of all, these statements, well, pay attention to them, i

don't know to what extent it is possible, but it is all the same. medvedev, although we call him there, when he gets to the keys , different epithets are given, i won’t repeat myself now, but he is putin’s deputy in retbez, he has a position, that is, vice-putin, he is there, though, maybe he wanted something else, but he is a vice, vice putin, that is why he was given such a role, which was played by zhirinovsky before, i.e. sometimes these are some attempts at horror stories, already hope. and often it is simply for the domestic audience of russia, the elections there are coming soon, they want to consolidate there those who are so bellicose that they will show their mother... to america, yes, of course, they will never do this, they are afraid, but in i will remind you that they also have borders with other nato countries, that is, there are problems here, because

they actually have borders with estonia, and with finland, and with latvia, and with lithuania through the kaliningrad region, they have these borders with poland, that is, well, there are a lot of problems here. on this very territory, that's why they take it seriously there, and that's why estonia is preparing for the construction, as i understand it, of defense lines already this year, that is , fortifications and the corresponding readiness to deploy a larger number of nato troops later. lithuania is preparing to receive a mechanized brigade of the german bundeswehr, complete with tanks with... with self-propelled, well, with armored personnel carriers and so on, that is, it was a completely different situation, in the air of nato, so that you understand, the poles, well, i will not

to go into details, but i think they have realized their mistakes, now any missiles, russian planes take off there, when we have an alarm, in poland, at least a couple of fighters, or even a squadron, are also being raised, now constant training has been introduced, i i understand, well, it was reported the other day, maybe it was earlier, introduced over the benelux, belgium, the netherlands, luxembourg, f-35, well, at least the f-35 was not on duty like that, the f-35 and a couple takes off in the mode of constant rotation, i.e. changes in rotation, constantly monitors the air space. the f-35 and 2 are, i will tell you, a powerful control of this direction, that is, they already have their own, not many people looked at the statements. then there were statements, let me remind you, in the original , burn london to ashes, there they were on washington medvedev launched a nuclear attack, everyone has already

seen it, but they see real actions already from preparation, i understand, because the military will not do that , they currently have 90,000 trainings, a working version of these trainings, well , the plan is to counter an attack by russia on one of the countries of the region. first of all, that's why where did the confrontation go, that's why in bilda, when they said this plan with these arrows , how to treat it, it was a training plan, they don't hide nato countries, they don't hide it, they don't call it country x, as it used to be in the computer computer or real exercises, this is russia, these countries are preparing for a confrontation with russia, the only question is that it would be possible to strengthen ukraine as much as possible now. weapons in a concentrated form, and then they might not have encountered it, but if they wait and think that they

will be strengthened from within, as a result they will allow, even in the conditions of war, i emphasize, even in the conditions of the continuation of the war with ukraine, the russians can resort to provocations, so you know, i don't know, sometimes these statements are just consolidation of their own. those in russia, this is an increase in cheer-patriotism, and sometimes they can send such signals in this way, but it is no secret that all these lines with moscow are maintained from washington and the countries of the european union. the goals of the president of the russian federation putin regarding ukraine have remained unchanged, he still wants to destroy ukraine as an independent state and subjugate the ukrainian people - said the permanent representative of the united states of america. at the osce, michael carpenter, and at a meeting of the organization's permanent council on thursday in vienna, he stated the following: it is clear that putin and his entourage

do not see ukraine as a sovereign independent state, but as prize real estate for an imaginary empire controlled by the kremlin, filled with unfree people, a population they despise and seek to subjugate their will by force, contrary to what the kremlin would like believe the euro-atlantic to be true... the future is quite real, while today there was also information that the head of german intelligence, bruno kahl, said that putin is not against attacking nato, if ukraine were forced to surrender, it would not quench russia's thirst for power , unless the west demonstrates a clear willingness to defend itself, putin will no longer have a reason not to attack nato. putin's goal, he said, is to restore the former power and greatness of great russia. that's about it, mr. valery. our western partners are right and everything is logical, but why do our western partners not set a global goal of demilitarization

of russia. deputization of russia, eventually denazification of russia? well, they have an inertia of thinking. what they say publicly today, in march 22, i, well, just non-stop, not only me, we all called everyone, well, at the end of february, at the beginning of march, everyone, whom, with whom we maintained contacts in order to... maximally help ukraine in these most difficult days. and even then and later, i am from my, well, you can say, friends from others countries that occupy important positions today and continue to occupy them, i gave a very skeptical assessment of my forecast, well, i only speak for myself, i said that look, they will still try to provoke you, that is, one way or another, it was very

received skeptically. in that period , then the situation changed gradually, first from intelligence, community intelligence, then gradually to defense structures, well, mainly to defense departments, then gradually to some politicians, now it has come to the point that finally politicians are announcing it, here are two it took years for them to declare it, i think it will take some time for them to understand that without... russia, there will be nothing of putin's in europe, because i am not saying how to change it, that is, it is a lot of different issues , but without this, this aggressive policy may continue even after the de-occupation of ukrainian territories. another mistake that they are making now, now we have the following discussion: from their point of view, it means that we just need to provide weapons, and they have one question:

which ones can we deploy, mobilize how many people, how many hundreds of thousands, and i tell them , listen, first of all, this is not fair, and secondly, do not think that ukraine will fight for you all forever, because we are not only closing our territories, we are also closing the security of europe, well, by and large , nato on the european continent, so there must be collective action, that is , collective action, if you are not able today, then... everything will come, war will come to your territory, and what are they wrong? they are wrong in that they believe that as long as putin is gassed in ukraine, he will not do anything steps in their direction, it is wrong, if the war will be as it is now, positional, will do, if it will be deceived from the deoccupation of the ukrainian territory, and this requires a completely different approach in strategy, the provision of completely different aid in terms of scale and

speed, then. .. maybe he won’t have the time and opportunity for this, but if you stop like this and keep, excuse me, the ukrainian armed forces under pressure, there are shells and everything else, maybe, yes, i understand, there are difficulties, of course, but if you don't find it the decision to manufacture weapons will be put on the rails as much as possible, well, this is also a question for us , yes, well, i am talking about partners now, we must put the production of munitions, well, that is, both shells and cartridges. that is, it is primarily for a completely different production and here is a very important point, they live far from the war, so in order for it to work, a political decision is needed, for example, if there is a large order for factories in germany and other countries, this will be sooner made, the same productions as the french have now discovered according to caesar, it means that it will not be produced alone for one and a half years.