children's search service or on facebook or instagram of the children's search service. and i want to note that any information about the child is important in the search. let's not be indifferent and let's try to find sasha ivanov together. also, i ask each of you to share this video on your social media pages if possible. in general , the deportation of children is a component of the crime of genocide. therefore, i would like to note that if you know of any crime against... a child, in particular abduction or deportation, do not remain indifferent and immediately report it to the police, or report it to our site stopcrimeua, you can do it even anonymously. i also ask you to take just a few minutes of your time and go to the website of the child tracing service. here in the "missing children of ukraine" section, you can see boys and girls who are currently wanted. look closely at theirs. face and i will be

very grateful if you share information about missing children in your facebook or instagram, because of course, the more people see the announcement about the search for a child, the more there will be more chances to find her, and suddenly you personally recognize one of them, immediately call our hotline 11630, calls from all mobile operators in ukraine are free. we have created a resource through which you can report. about any crime against a child in any city, at any time, just go to the site and report, and we will launch all possible mechanisms to punish the criminal. stopcrime ua. there are discounts on hepar 10% in pharmacies plantain, mr. savings there are discounts on ice cream. 10% in

psarynyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. an unusual look at news. good health, ladies and gentlemen, my name is mykola veresen. sharp presentation of facts and competent opinions. and in america they also say, let's have better roads , we will have even better ones. a special look at the events in ukraine, there will be some katsaps on the border of kyiv and beyond. what kind of world is he dreaming of, pa- norman, can we imagine it? all this in an informational marathon with mykola veresny: saturday 17:10, sunday 18:15 at espresso. hryhori and hryhoriy tyutyunnikov, writers, brothers, sons of the same father, about the relationship of half-brothers, about how to turn from a ukrainian boy into a russian-speaking soviet person and, under the influence of his older brother, to return to his native language. about talents. the dignity and pressure

of the totalitarian machine on a person in the documentary grihyr and grihyory tobacconists. sunday, january 28 at 9:30 a.m. at espresso. vasyl zima's big broadcast. two hours of airtime, two hours of your time. two hours to learn about the war and how the world lives. two hours to keep up with economic and sports news. two o'clock in the company of favorite presenters, presenters who have become like-minded to many, as well as distinguished guests of the studio, the events of the day in two hours, vasyl zima's big broadcast, a project for intelligent and caring people, in the evening at espresso. verdict with serhii rudenko, from now on in a new two-hour format, even more analytics, even more important topics, even more top guests, foreign experts, inclusion from abroad, about ukraine, the world, the front, society, and also feedback, you can have your say on the... globe of the day

with a phone survey. turn on and turn on verdict with serhii rudenko. every saturday from 20 to 22 for espresso. the espresso channel and ukrainian pen present the self-titled project with myroslava barchuk. a series of conversations with ukrainian and western intellectuals who analyze and comment on the most relevant social debates. what news will be analyzed by the guests of the project this week and actually. we will find out who will be the guest of the studio already this sunday, clearly, the topics will be relevant, the guests will be special, their own names with myroslava barchuk. sunday, 17:10 on espresso.

i welcome you, dear tv viewers, on the espresso tv channel, studio zahid program. we will analyze the most important events of this week, there are quite a lot of them, and all of them will have an extremely serious continuation in the near future. our guests today are roman bezsmertny and myroslav chakh. now

roman bezsmertny, an iconic ukrainian politician and diplomat, will work on the air of the tv channel. glory to ukraine, mr. ambassador, i congratulate you. glory to the heroes, good day, mr. antin. the fall of il-76. in the belgorod region, yes, the story is extremely difficult, the story, i would say so, is even multi-echeloned, but in any case, as of now, the russians will try to use it for their own purposes. it is clear and obvious that this story has not been played out to the end, and its original content is that several factors are combined here, which will not give the russians the opportunity to leave this thing out of informational attention. the first of them is very significant, it is an international component, and those who correctly noticed that the plane flew on a very interesting route this summer, egypt, syria, and russia. and

those information leaks, fragmentary, which were, they give reasons to speak of quite serious. things in this regard, especially since it is necessary to remember what was happening in egypt and syria at that time. the second thing is that, in fact , the group of negotiators did not get on the plane, this fact is also very important, and it indicates that russia has huge problems in the communications system, and in the system of ensuring these communications, i am not saying that in the security system. the third thing is the exchange of prisoners of war itself, this is another very important thing an important factor, and moscow, led by the führer, is looking for any way to collapse this situation, and blame

ukraine for it. and the fourth thing, which is very important, is that today there is no more important fact, more important fragment. in russia's war against ukraine than information and psychological attacks. each, especially, such a fact, will lead russia to accuse ukraine of the biggest, most oppressive sins. i ask everyone who is interested in this fragment to find the material, it is a video and the text material about the briefing in the white house, literally after... after this information appeared and to listen to the journalist's question to john kirby, who was giving a briefing at the time, how he hinted that ukraine, you see, violates some humanitarian basis of waging war, so she took such a step, and what

can you say from this, that is, it is obviously clear that for russia, for führer moskovsky, any fact in this... war will be used as a certain kind information attack, and in this regard, we should also address ukrainian journalists, those who takes care of this field, those who write, because i am just a promoter for the sake of my professional interest, but what about who wrote, who got in there, who is a firewood, i just want to tell all these people, understand that the ukrainian army, it adheres to the norms of international humanitarian law ... right, i have said this more than once, every soldier is instructed in this regard, and an officer, any officer who makes a decision in such a case, cannot give the command to fire unless he is convinced that the attack is about for

a military or military purpose, that's all very well is carefully studied at the relevant instructional conversations in the armed forces of ukraine, therefore... to imagine initially that a command was given to fire at a non-military object is inadmissible, and this is in principle. and just in case, i will say, if this happens, god forbid, then this is a thing that is not a system, it is a kind of violation that happened as a result of certain negligent actions or oversight, which, according to ukrainian legislation, will carry a criminal penalty. i say once again, i don't want to name, but the number of those who are now in the imprisonment of ukrainian military personnel for... violation of international humanitarian law, it sometimes even impresses those who monitor

these issues from the point of view of the un, so there must be a principled position here: the following fact happened to you in the information circle, right at the start of its reject, because this is what can be called in the popular literature, as an excess, and not a system command, which is given in... them forces of ukraine. we immediately understand that the kremlin is starting to signal, or maybe call through some of its closed channels, they say, this is how they can use american weapons in ukraine, and we understand that this is also a rather difficult, drastic issue for the americans. the americans, as far as i understand , set some kind of unspoken parameter, yes, the reconquest of our territories, the return of our lands, but at the moment the question of what... before the use of long-range systems, for example, on the territory of russia, somehow it has not yet

been regulated, the americans have not yet matured , i did not accidentally say about the plot at the briefing in the white house, but as a confirmation, including your words are the recent message of german chancellor scholz that yes, we are considering the issue of supplying ukraine with long-range taurus, but we have a caveat. that the ukrainian side can , you see, hit moscow with them, so i want to emphasize a small nuance here, there was no such direct speech anywhere, but nevertheless, this message itself, the one that is enclosed in quotation marks as direct speech, is attributed to the events of il-76 and awarded on the contrary in order to attract attention and again... the issue of supplying ukraine with medium-range missiles long range, if you were to slow down, and

the second quote went for a walk at all funny about what you see, the chancellor does not know about what the uk ministry of defense was offering to exchange for actually, how was the real situation, he said that we are aware of such a position and left further without any ... any comment, on the contrary , the mass media reported that he did not know anything about this fragment, and in the first part , if he had said that they had reservations about the possibility of strikes by the ukrainian armed forces on moscow . here you go a vivid example of how the kremlin uses a number of facts in connection with this anchor that pulls the information situation. that security guarantees are currently being provided to us, in particular from the big seven, we understand that

we have stronger and stronger ties with great britain, and the security agreement with the united kingdom best demonstrates this, how should we, in principle, use the information given to us chances and how to make sure that similar signed memoranda and agreements do not repeat the fate of the so -called budapest memorandum, because there are a lot of correct and nice... formulas, but there is also the question of concrete implementation of them, this question is very important, i would even call it the number one question today from the point of view of international aid and strengthening the very things that you said about, security guarantees , but at once i cannot help but ask several very important questions for myself, for all of us, this is an international agreement, and an international agreement that has a very wide impact. on the internal relationship situation, on the external situation, but as you can see, for some reason it is not submitted to the ratification by

parliament meanwhile, the constitution clearly defines that such acts are valid only after the consent to them is given by the parliament, verkhovna rada of ukraine. this, hold now if the information. second, if so, i will remind everyone that the budapest memorandum has not been ratified either. but at that time the previous constitution was still in effect and it allowed similar things, including such things as the provision of external guarantees by the ministry of finance, the conclusion of mandatory similar industry and sectoral agreements, and so on, and the agreement on issues of security and defense could be called such, well, this is also a stretch, instead, this document, it cannot not be ratified from the point of view of the norms, the position of the current constitution, this is the first thing that must be remembered, and therefore here this is

a breeze of the budapest memorandum, it already home and the second thing is the implementation mechanisms , i am still convinced today that the budapest memorandum is a very serious document, but what is missing, what is not there and what cannot be in such a document, as well as in the document signed by reshisunak and by president zelenskyi, this is the mechanism of its implementation, what i mean, well, the first thing is actually ratification, because then it becomes a law, which means that the organizational structure is being adjusted under it in ukraine and, accordingly, great britain, because i will remind you of an analogue, an analogue of a similar security guarantee is an act between the government of the united states of america and taiwan, it is called

the taiwan relations act, the taiwan relations act, which, not only... it was voted on by the congress and the senate, it was also voted on by the taiwan parliament. thus it is if the document is for two parties, and i would still recommend to the ukrainian specialists who take care of this topic, to take this document and look at it, how it is designed. next, if you read the signed agreement, it is limited: the time and term, in fact, is a document about two-year guarantees, and also, if you look at international norms, then if you take away the ratification, if you understand that such an act does not carry an organizational security system, then it can be interpreted simply as

an agreement between prime minister reshisunak and the president... there is one more thing that is very important, the problem here is a matter of competence, if you look at this document, it contains components that relate to the powers of the ministry of defense, the cabinet of ministers and the president, there are things that are related today within the competence of the president, i.e. in the field of defense policy, there are specific figures that relate to money and objects, the affairs of the ministry of defense, well, in the extreme case of the cabinet of ministers, and so on, that is , all this indicates that at will, if to get guarantees, obviously from the huge volume of these things that were discussed, the key thing was lost: this is not a law for both parties, it is very important, secondly, the parliaments

did not ratify it, from here it must be read absolutely clearly: financial security.. . its authenticity will be under a big question mark, but from the point of view of political rhetoric, it is a colossal step forward, because it is shown that great britain, but here a comma is placed further, as a country that does not belong to the european union, you have it in mind, secondly, it is like a country of the anglo-saxon bloc, certainly, because it reads like that, and reads like that, moreover, as a country that belongs to the so-called copenhagen format, which is what is included further in ramstein and so on, it is ready to provide appropriate assistance, but at the same time there is a flaw here, the essence of which can be that, only during the period of the sunak's premiership, because

if it is not a law, just an agreement between two persons, then it can... be read exactly like this, and i do not rule out, that in some time, after the conservatives leave power, it will be said, so be it the conservatives signed, let them implement such an agreement, because i say once again, this is not a law, it must be understood from the point of view of the norms of international, international law, you will tell me that there are even things in international law that speak of verbal agreements, yes, verbal agreements, but they are not reached. in matters of security, security guarantees, especially since these two words security guarantee, they indicate that this document had to correspond to the international one. the convention on agreements and treaties, which provides for the mandatory implementation of national constitutional norms from the point of view of actual

ratification, i am not saying this for the first time, i hope that in the future, and perhaps in the case of great britain, at least the ukrainian political leadership will return to this issue and send this document to the parliament for ratification. because i don't know for what reasons, i can't understand for what reasons the lack of ratification of such a document was allowed, because from the point of view of the information drive, political sounding, this is a great step, it's a great step, another matter, why they didn't make it actually legal the basis of the actions of such a document, because you understand when...... you and i are now being told that, well, you see, in the budapest memorandum the word is wrong, or it is not translated like that, so in relation to this document, you and i will be told that it has not yet

been ratified, on the basis of which certain resources will be allocated for its implementation from the budget of one state, another state, and so on. i completely agree with you, this is an extremely important moment, this is a fundamentally important moment, and let's hope that the prime minister of the united kingdoms of great britain and northern ireland richie sunak will also take the necessary steps when it comes to working with the british parliament in particular, but in any case, such signals show that certain parameters of what is called a new security agreement for ukraine or a new security format for of ukraine, that it is emerging, what should we expect from those states, countries, blocs that we consider our allies, but at the moment they are... our friends, partners and buddies. by itself, the agreement that has already been signed, and the agreements that will subscribe further. what are they talking about? that the thesis that we

cannot work with nato countries, with each cream, because we have to work only with nato as a whole, it does not correspond to the truth. this means that it is very important that today we all realize that the issue of... regional, continental, global security is a multi-component issue. in this system, it is obvious, there may already be bilateral agreements, further, regional agreements, further, continental agreements, global agreements, but they may constitute the whole, in fact, is what you and i have been talking about for more than a year. they said because of what follows from that, from that new year's christmas message of the then british foreign minister les truss in

a speech at the london city hall, when she spoke about the coming time of a labile security system, soft, and in fact, if you look on this, then these are bilateral agreements, they should be aimed at what, but at ensuring the security of ukraine, at ensuring. security of the countries of central europe, to ensure the security of the countries of the european continent, further to ensure the security of the countries of the north atlantic bloc, to ensure the countries of the eurasian bloc and global security, these are actually the components, these components, they should not create a hedgehog in relation to each other, and it is most suitable for everything it is... to choose , to systematize, of course, the ramstein format, and here it is very important to, well, at least somehow in the ramstein format for today, move on to

a conversation on this topic, because even the first thing we talked about with you, it looks like : this some bilateral industry agreements, because it will be read that way from the point of view, actually, now, and what does it have to do with it? has to do with central european security, absolutely not, what we are talking about is like a mirage like an intermarium, there are two seas, three seas and so on. now, how will it develop in the system of relations in the nato system. and if we add to this that europe today is constantly talking about its own security. moreover, the current training that takes place at... what are they about testify? that due to the fact that the minimum invited participant is the united states of america, and the united states of america is

today 90% of the security implemented by nato. the current exercises show that there are 90% of the chosen model and legend of the countries and states of europe, and literally several destroyers of the united states of america, which of the almost 90,000 personnel participating in this exercise are present at them, that is, it is already a shot at that model, which... can be compiled after the statements candidate trump that we can withdraw from nato, although this is not an answer, and it is obvious that it will not be the case, but it is clear that preparations for this are being made, now one more thing, it is necessary to understand that in matters of security, bilateral the relations that ukraine will conclude with nato states, they must be implemented in the form of concrete steps, that is, conditionally speaking,

training is underway. not conditionally speaking, but not conditionally speaking, realistically speaking, nato will interact with countries that wish to join nato, well, in particular, such as ukraine, further, how they will interact with those that have already formed as a separate defense alliance, well, such as, for example, the bite, the indo-pacific bloc, which exists separately to this day, although in some countries it calls. so it's obvious that formalizing the role of the contact group is a must , it really pisses me off because i went through the contact group in minsk when i hear ramstein being referred to as the defense assistance contact group ukraine, well, as the ukrainians say classics, to contact, it does not mean

to decide, you understand? and all this suggests that today those who outline and those who sit on the button of european security, and regional, european, and continental, in general and global, they do not quite clearly understand, but how all this will interact between itself, how it will cooperate, because holding additional meetings, even online meetings, does not solve the issue of provision. urgent provision of troops with ammunition, armored vehicles, maintenance of all this and so on. therefore, i can say that for now , if we take the fact that the path that ukraine started to follow, signing bilateral guarantees on security, and the transition to regional security is not even visible, moreover, i do not

see that they understand... this problem, but when you listen to people like orban or people like fico there , they, what do they think, that we will stay here under nato, and you try there, but they think so in vain, i will remind them of the campaign with suvorov in the alps, it is not clear what he was doing there, but keep in mind the monuments suvorov's troops are standing all over russia even now, no one has led them anywhere, so where the boots of the russian...soldiers can get into, this is known only to the moscow führer, and this must be understood very well. thank you very much, mr. ambassador, for this extremely important discussion on the air of the tv channel, i want to remind our tv viewers that now roman bezsmertny, an iconic politician and diplomat, was working for them. there are discounts on deflu, 20% in psyllanyk, bam and oskad pharmacies.

there are discounts on lactial of 10% in psylsnyk, pam and oskad pharmacies. exclusively on the air our channel. congratulations, friends, politklub is on the air on the espresso tv channel. the most relevant topics of the week. russia's war against ukraine, the war in the middle east. on the border between ukraine and poland. topics that resonate in our society. drone attack on kyiv and other cities of ukraine, drone attacks on moscow and other russian cities. analysis of the processes that change the country and each of us. the country should get.