300 will be delivered in the near future, and now when we mention these new trinity drones, it is actually this additional package, which is actually a free supply from the company quantumvector to the kyiv administration, these drones are civilian, they are vertical takeoff, they directed primarily to capture destroyed to carry out aerial photography, and these are rather civilian samples, the main emphasis of the company. is doing precisely for military aid to ukraine, it is absolutely powerful, unfortunately, we have to interrupt at this moment, because a moment of silence is approaching, serhii zgurets, director of the information and consulting company defense express was with us, and now we will honor all those who died due to the attack of the russians. let's take a moment. memory of ukrainian military and

civilian citizens of ukraine who died in the war started by russia. greetings, this is svoboda ranok, my name is kateryna nekrecha, and in this stream we talk about... about such topics. in tabaivka

, kharkiv oblast, ukrainian forces pushed russian troops to the edge of the village. earlier , the russian forces seemed to capture him, about what telegram channels reported. the armed forces note that the direction of kupyansk remains a priority for the russian army. we talk to the military about the situation at the front. if ukraine loses the war, then budapest will take transcarpathia, said parliamentarian and leader of the hungarian far-right party laszlo torotskai. romanian colleague claudio utarziu said that for the reunification of sovereignty, romania should annex part of ukraine. while mentioning northern bukovina and southern bessarabia. what do these statements of nationalist leaders testify to and what can lead to them parties of these countries. on the day the il-76 fell , 65 ukrainian soldiers were to be exchanged. ukraine confirmed the list of people who, according to russia, were on board the plane. kyrylo budanov stated that russia does not provide evidence that... ukrainian military personnel were really on

board, so neither the russian nor the ukrainian side can fully answer what happened, he said. we will hear whether gur has new details in this broadcast. i invite you to ask your questions to the speakers of this morning show just below this video on the channel radio svoboda. and also don't forget that every like and subscribe to our channel is important to promote these videos. any ceasefire is broken. russia, it will have time to recover and regroup, in the future it will be able to conduct offensive campaigns and strengthen control over already occupied territories. analysts of the american institute for the study of war came to this conclusion. in addition, russia's goals regarding further territorial conquest in ukraine will not change, analysts write. in the university point out that in russia they can pretend to be interested in offering concessions regarding ukraine's place in western institutions, in particular nato and the eu. trying something like this

to encourage the allies to make preventive concessions regarding the territorial integrity of ukraine. despite this, analysts of the institute for the study of war write that there is no reason to believe that putin will not abandon any of his own commitments to allow ukraine to integrate into nato or the eu, and cite the example that he has already violated russia's previous commitments not to violate sovereignty and territorial integrity of ukraine, in particular, by annexing crimea and occupying the eastern and southern regions. in tabaivka , kharkiv oblast, ukrainian forces pushed russian troops to the edge of the village, analysts of the deep state project say. earlier in the morning, they reported that the settlement was captured by russian forces. stabilization measures continued there all day yesterday, the defense forces did not allow the russian troops to gain a foothold. the settlement has moved into a gray area, so they say in the deep state. the situation there is difficult, fighting. i will point out that about admiration

russian blogger volodymyr romanov, as well as telegram channel 2 major, reported tabaivka on saturday. the settlement was allegedly captured by the fighters of the 47th division of the russian army, in the reports of the russian ministry of defense for the last day, they say that the position of the russian army in the kupinsky direction has improved, but there was no mention of the capture of tabaivka. the ukrainian general staff does not confirm the capture of tabaivka. meanwhile, russia may launch a new offensive on the kharkiv region. this was announced by the chief of the general staff in estonia, colonel rebo informs estonian public broadcasting. in particular, he says that the nearest. for weeks, russia may try to attack the border areas of belgorod and kharkiv regions in order to distract ukrainian units from the kupyansk line. i would like to note that earlier, at the beginning of january, the british newspaper telegraph, referring to the data of local intelligence and military intelligence, reported that ukrainian forces

were preparing to repulse a new offensive of russian troops near kharkiv. the publication even named the probable date of this new offensive - it is the 15th january then, responding to this article. telegraph, head of the kharkiv regional military administration, oleg sinygubov, reported that there is no concentration of russian troops on the border with the kharkiv region. currently, sinyohubov confirms that russian forces have resumed an intensive offensive in the kupinsky direction and does not rule out that they may go on a wider offensive in the kharkiv region. we will talk about the situation in this area further. volodymyr fitio, lieutenant colonel, head of the public relations service of the ground forces command of the armed forces of ukraine, joined our broadcast. greetings, good morning, glory to ukraine, glory to the heroes, the first question for you is, as of now, can you tell us what the current situation is in the settlement of tabaivka, yes, the lemano-kupin direction remains

active in us, the enemy is not stops storming in this direction during the whole past day , 10 enemy attacks were repulsed, the russians did not take the tabaivka, fighting continues there... actions and their statements cannot be believed, because they are more inventing than telling facts, there are ongoing battles, the tabaivka is in enough in an unfavorable place, it is located in the lower part of the country, so whoever goes down there now will immediately become a target in a shooting range in this marshy area, so fierce battles are going on there now, ukrainian defenders are trying to push the enemy back, and... from the positions in which he is now is located, therefore the hostilities continue, they continue along the entire line of contact in the operational-strategic grouping of the khortyts troops, so 10 attacks were repelled in the lemano-kupinsky direction, these are sinkivka, tabaivka, terny, yampolivka, here

the enemy used 18 drones, 700 carried out artillery fire on the ukrainian defenders, we see great activity of enemy artillery, nevertheless. managed to eliminate 229 russian occupiers and 84 units of military equipment, including four tanks and 7 bmps, four enemy attacks were repulsed in the bakhmut direction: bohdanivka, ivanovske, klishchiivka, 29 kamika drones were used by the enemy, 613 artillery shells and the enemy lost 128 of its servicemen and 45 units of military equipment, a tank, bmp, mortars and a uav control center. let's see. what as active actions began in october last year in the zone of responsibility of the operational and strategic grouping of the khortesian troops, they do not subside for a day, the enemy has been trying to attack since october and all that he was able to attack, we accordingly see such minor tactical

the improvements that he has gained, and these are uh quite conditional such improvements, because the front line is active, accordingly, the ukrainian defenders are ... in an active defense, which makes it possible to move to offensive actions, to improve their tactical position, for under the condition that it will bring some benefit and minimal loss in our human forces, therefore, first of all, the lives of servicemen, and this is the most important value for the armed forces and for the state of ukraine in general. regarding the statements about the northern borders, we respect all our partners, we respect. their analytical departments, centers, intelligence data, all this is taken into account in our work, but we also see if there is enough intelligence to carry out this attack from the north, at a time when the war is online, to make preparations for conducting

it is almost impossible to attack unnoticed, at the moment the number of troops on the northern border is not enough to attack kharkiv oblast from the north, the border is occupied. engineering structures, there are defense forces that are in position, and accordingly, there is no danger from this direction at the moment, everyone else. the movement of raschits along the line along the strip of responsibility of khortytsia in the northern direction, we are monitoring, we are looking and at the moment nothing has changed in suvkhorts, as there were 200 00 of them, yes they are in principle and the number is kept only supplemented by reserves in order to make up for the losses, their losses are large, only as of january 28, the enemy lost 10,530 of its servicemen in the zone of the operational-strategic grouping of the khortets troops . yes, to this statement that russia may launch a new offensive on the kharkiv region, as stated by the chief of the general staff of estonia, colonel rebo,

and i would also like to add that the ukrainian border guards, well, they record the most russian drgs currently in the sumy region, the least in chernihivska, and they say about the activity in the kharkiv region that there is on the border certain activity, can you comment here whether this activity has increased at all or not, and again, why then the partners declare, let's say, about such plans of the russians. on what grounds can these statements be made and why are they made? you know , russia's plans for ukraine, they are unchangeable , it is to seize the whole of ukraine, we understand that, and their plans have not changed, they just have primary, mid-term and long-term plans that they want to implement, so in general their plans are not changeable, they want to capture all of ukraine and destroy us, well, no for whom it is not news, here is... as for kharkiv oblast, shelling, mortar shelling,

artillery shelling of the border areas are carried out daily, on a daily basis, fpv drones are used, that is, this is the kind of disturbing fire that the enemy uses on our positions all the time , which are there, this is the daily routine for our defenders on the northern kharkiv front. i thank you for joining and informing me about what is happening in your direction, volodymyr fityo, lieutenant colonel, chief. services of communications with svoboda ranok was a guest of the public of the ground forces command of the armed forces of ukraine. the leaders of the nationalist parties of romania and hungary publicly spoke about the annexation of ukrainian territories. we are talking about the leaders of the far-right parties alliance for the union of romanians and hungarian nasha batkivschyna. the ukrainian authorities have not yet responded to these statements. here, the leader of the romanian party aur, claudio terziu, during a speech in the city of iasi, stated that... romania will not be, i quote, truly sovereign until it reintegrates the romanian state into its

natural borders, referring to the ukrainian territories, the party whose leader is claudia terziu, who is a member of the country's legislative bodies, the senate and the chamber of deputies, during the speech he also added that, i quote: romania is sandwiched between two empires, referring to russia and nato, and expressed the idea of ​​establishing relations with russia. i believe that there is a need to thaw relations. between romania and russia, i recognize the need for good cooperation between romania and russia, i am ready to support it, but only after how will russia prove that it also wants all this. shortly before the statement of his romanian colleague, the leader of the hungarian far-right party our fatherland, lászló toročkai said that hungary will claim transcarpathia if ukraine loses the war with russia. the party our fatherland is also represented in the authorities and occupies six seats in the national assembly. legislative body of hungary. during the annual party, party conference in budapest,

laslotskaya added that the war in ukraine will, quote, destroy europe and send the economy to the bottom. if the statehood of ukraine ceases to exist as a result of the war, the nasha batkivshchyna party, as the only party in hungary, will claim transcarpathia. i would like to add that on january 29, the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine, dmytro kuleba, and the head of the office... andrii yarmak, are scheduled to meet with the head of the ministry of foreign affairs of hungary, peter sijarto, and according to the spokesman of the ministry of foreign affairs of hungary, oleg nikolenko, the topics will be the organization of a meeting between the president of ukraine, volodymyr zelensky, and prime minister minister of hungary viktor orban. well , we will further analyze such statements in our air. volodymyr fesenko, a political scientist , joins freedom mornings. congratulations, volodymyr, thank you for joining. i congratulate you. how disturbing are such statements, what can they indicate? here i am talking about... the statements of the leaders of the nationalist parties of hungary and romania, and why so synchronously, and why now? no, well, first of all, let's not

be surprised, we are talking about the statements of leaders or representatives of right-wing, nationalist parties who dream of the revival of either greater hungary or greater romania, the fact that it happened in one day, well i think that the second statement in romania, it is possible to a certain extent... the consequences of the hungarian colleague's statement, well, since he said so, let's state our claims, so the synchronicity, perhaps, is... such a situational phenomenon, there is no regularity here , but there is a chain reaction, it is primarily due to the fact that russia is at war with ukraine, there is the fact of the annexation of ukrainian territories by putin, and leaders who have similar views, the views are the same, imperial,

aggressive views, like those of putin, such mini-putins, they inevitably appear. this situation was already in history, i will remind you, when hitler was there, mini-hitlers appeared all over europe, in the same romania, in the same hungary, in many other countries, they were created by hitler, they were supported by hitler, and this as a chain reaction, this and or as the spread of a virus, in this case a virus and authoritarian attitudes. and authoritarian manifestations, as well as usurpation plans, but this must be opposed , i emphasize that for now these are only statements of marginal politicians, while the european union and nato exist, which are based on principles, i do not say about the un, because the un, unfortunately, does not demonstrate its effectiveness, but both the un and nato, and why is it

important, because both romania and hungary, they are part of nato, no matter what. the change of borders cannot be talked about, this is the basic principle of the existence of these international organizations, which we also strive to join, here are the actions of russia, they are a threat, because putin is a model, a model of violation of the international order, and if putin is not stopped, it will begin international chaos, in particular the chaos of dividing borders. volodymyr, well, if only they were statements, you know, there are just some people. or politicians, but these people are also there in the parliaments of the states, and is it even possible to understand now how much their statements coincide with the mood of the society of these countries, how much this agenda, this political view of the situation on the russian-ukrainian war, he can to change and are such politicians, they can set, you know, such certain trends?

listen, society is always a collection of people with...views and people with views that, well, let's say sympathize with putin, or are identical with putin's views, you will find a lot of such people, even in the united states of america, now, well, less than a third, but more than a quarter of people who support political forces that support putin's position, such people are in germany . an alternative for germany, now a new left-wing party is emerging, which, by the way, is also rapidly increasing its popularity, the main reason there is definitely not sympathy for putin and not anti-ukrainian views, but rather anti-migrant sentiments and disappointment activities of, let's say, the current coalition, but nevertheless, these political forces, let's

say, support putin's position in many respects, in particular, they call for... an immediate end to the war and the end of support for ukraine. there are no imperial manifestations like those of the representatives of these marginal political forces in romania and hungary. yes, they have representatives in their parliaments, but again, this, well, at one time, there mosley, a supporter of hitler, great britain, was also a prominent figure, and also, shall we say, was present in english. parliament, so these are situations when, when yes, these parties are not in power, but they can reflect certain trends, certain manifestations of public sentiment, this is not inevitable, another thing, the main thing is that they do not dominate, as in modern russia, so that it did not pose a threat, or such parties were not

in power, this is important, and i emphasize once again, i oppose this implementation. these plans are the principles on which such international organizations as the eu and nato are built, as long as they exist, as long as these rules are in place, there are no direct threats for us there is none, but the main thing is that in order for this chain reaction to stop, it is necessary to stop the main aggressor who provokes these sentiments, who in fact creates the very reason, the very example that it is possible, it is possible to change the border. it is impossible to seize the lands of a neighboring country , this is fundamentally important, everything else is secondary, but now we see a situation where the european union cannot even help ukraine, yes, because... hungary opposes it, and financial time writes about the fact that in the eu , they are generally developing a plan to undermine the economy hungary, in the case of budapest

's refusal to agree on the allocation of a new aid package to hungary, it is wrong and incorrect, in general, some publications, even in the western media, i will say frankly, in recent years, i have had a very strong disappointment in the western media as a model of journalism, because emotions are unruly. incorrect assessments, unverified facts , unfortunately, there were no less than here, from time to time, this is true, even in such respectable publications, as now, and not only, there are, unfortunately, many examples, precisely very much well-known publications, so, first of all, the european union does not stop supporting ukraine, last year the volume of financial support of ukraine from the european union was higher. than, for example, from the united states of america, but in the military sense , military aid from the us was more, and financial budget aid from the eu was

more than from the us. the usa and the european union are our biggest donors. that is why i am reminding you of this in principle, because we even have a deformation in public opinion, when they ask who helps us the most, then the usa is mentioned, the great one is mentioned. britain, although, for example, great britain , with all due respect to them, the amount of aid is smaller than from germany, and the european union is mentioned somewhere at the end of the top ten , although the european union is one of our main donors, yes, hungary has blocked it temporarily, for now the decision to provide ukraine with 50 billion euros for the next four years, not now, for the next four years, but this is what the financial times writes about, that the european union is not developing plans to destroy the hungarian economy, scenarios of backup options,

decisions, if orban blocks it, then there are at least two other scenarios to help ukraine, such as voting for the allocation of these 50 billion euros, and the scenario of the destruction of the hungarian economy is not being considered, well, this is wrong, there are no such plans. in the european union , but some european politicians, in particular in the european parliament, they propose to act, if orbán continues to block joint decisions of the european union, european solidarity, then act on article seven of the treaty on the european union, that hungary is temporarily deprived of the right to vote in the voting of such decisions, such plans are considered, but as a last resort, but let's say this, the fact that such plans are considered also indicates... that the situation in the countries of the european union is not easy, so to speak, there is one important retort: ​​the situation in the european union is more predictable, more

consistent than, for example, the current situation in the united states, in the us congress, but i cannot say anything, for sure, whether there will be aid from the united states to ukraine, regarding aid from the european union on address of ukraine, i i can definitely state that this assistance will be provided, and i have no doubts about it, because it is in the interest of the european union and the mechanisms of the european union allow such assistance to be continued, especially since there is no other way out for them now, otherwise the russian troops in a year or it will be several years , thank you, thank you, volodymyr, for joining, volodymyr fesenko, a political scientist was a guest of svoboda ranok, subscribe to our channel, be sure to comment and ask your questions to those. neither side can answer to the end the question about what happened, this is how the crash of the ill-76 plane in the belgorod region of russia commented

the head of ukrainian intelligence, kyrylo budanov, on the air of the telethon. he says that despite the fact that the russian side continues to blame ukraine for the downing of the plane and assures that there were ukrainian prisoners of war on board, they have not yet shown the bodies and remains of the dead, which would confirm this information. if it happened, as the russian claims. federation, so why did russia hide it for several days and as of now and will continue to hide corpses, she should have shown it to the whole world, look, ukrainians are murderers, well, there are no corpses, there is nothing. in addition, budanov added that, in his opinion, the exchange of prisoners will take place in the near future, although earlier the head of the russian defense committee andriy kartapolov said that now, i quote, there is no question of an exchange. meanwhile, in the office of the ukrainian president, there is a version that the russian... side is manipulating the issue of the downfall of the il-76 in order to slow down the process of transferring anti-aircraft systems to ukraine defense, or seek to reduce the attention of the civilized world to violations of the rules

of warfare and conventions from the side. occupation troops of the russian federation. this opinion was expressed by the adviser to the head of the president's office, mykhailo podolyak, on the air of the telethon. in recent months, we have seen a large number of russian aircraft destroyed. that is , it is important for the russian federation that this does not happen, that ukraine does not have the opportunity to shoot down russian planes or use anti-missile systems on the front line. in the ukrainian coordination headquarters for issues treatment of prisoners of war previously confirmed that 65 people from the lists published in the telegram. margarita simonyan, the reporter of the russian state tv channel rashi today , indeed the names of those whom ukraine was supposed to return as part of the exchange of prisoners on january 24, the secretary of the coordination headquarters dmytro usov said that at the meeting of the representatives of the gur with the relatives of the ukrainian servicemen declared in the list, they showed a video of the russian side from probably consequences after the fall of il-76. according to usov, the relatives of the prisoners are not found special signs in published footage with fragments of bodies that would indicate

similarities with their relatives. previously, footage with the remains of the bodies was published by the russian investigative committee, and two days after the plane crash in the belohorod region , russian president vladimir putin commented on the event. he again blamed ukraine for the downing of the il-76 plane and said that the plane was shot down by anti-aircraft defense systems, because fragments of the corresponding missiles were apparently found at the place where the plane fell. according to him, russia could not have shot down this plane, because a system was installed on russian planes a stranger's own. main management once.

andriy yusov, representative of the main intelligence department of the ministry of defense of ukraine. mr. andriy, i congratulate you and i immediately want to ask whether the main versions of the ukrainian side regarding what happened with il-76 have changed, regarding the version about the friendly one. and fire, as putin said that it was impossible, that russia could not shoot down a fresh plane? well, first of all , the investigation is ongoing, we are not talking about, at the moment , not about versions, but about facts and information, so the information has become a little more, we were able to verify, confirm that the published the list, in fact, is really the people who were submitted for exchange, it happened again

in what official way. the negotiators conveyed that this is the information that the propagandists made public, this is what they can refer to, well, this is a peculiar way, as for the published photo and video materials, there are very few of them, we see that so far what is being distributed by the russian side, yes called the investigative committee, has a fragmentary character and is deliberately presented from such an angle that the actual means of defeat cannot be determined. ago that the hitting of certain missiles from certain installations has its own characteristic features, and experts, experts, here are insiders, can determine, well, what actually shot down the plane, regarding the words of a person similar to putin in this situation, well, he is as usual cunning, firstly, friendly fire and shooting down of russian

aircraft by russian means of anti-aircraft missile defense were repeatedly recorded. in different corners of the russian federation, in the occupied territories, near the front lines, it already happened. in addition , if we talk about literally the system is someone else's, it does not always prove it, and in the case of calculations of portable anti-aircraft missile complexes, which are also saturated in bilhorod, this is not an argument at all, so of course these words are more of an excuse, and the most important thing is not even what is said during propaganda meetings , for example, the information made public during the meeting of the un security council, we really expected that, in addition to the actual flow of some propaganda statements , the facts would be provided, well, we did not see anything new, nothing like that, so the investigation is ongoing, and actually, as for the fate of these people, of course, we must make every effort to find it out, it will definitely be done, and the topic of an international investigation is definitely not closed for ukraine.