clouds the nearest perspective from the first, from february 2, from the beginning of next month and the final winter month, atmospheric fronts will pass through the territory of ukraine, which will bring us precipitation in the form of rain and even sleet, and the wind is also expected to increase, this is how february will begin. well, for now , we thank january for warm weather tomorrow. she told us in detail about the weather, well, actually , there is no time to even sum up, i will just say thank you, we will meet tomorrow, take care, find out at the zsu, we will hold on buy, good evening, we are from ukraine, i congratulate you! dear tv viewers, on the air of

the tv channel, the program studio zahid. we will analyze the most important events of this week, there are quite a lot of them and all of them will have an unusually serious continuation in the near future. our guests today are roman bezsmertny and myroslav cheh. now roman bezsmertny, an iconic ukrainian politician and diplomat, will work on the air of the tv channel. glory to ukraine, mr. ambassador, i congratulate you. glory to the heroes, good day, mr. antin. the fall of il-76 in the belgorod region, yes history. an extremely difficult story, i would say so, even many echelons, but in any case, as the russians will now try to use it for their own purposes, it is clear and obvious that this story, it has not been played out to the end, and its content a- and, the initial one is that several factors are combined here, which will not give the russians the opportunity to leave, if... out of informational

attention, this thing. the first of them is very significant - it is an international component, and those who correctly noticed that this plane flew along a very interesting route: egypt, syria, and russia. and those information leaks, fragmentary, that were, they give grounds for talking about quite serious things in this regard, especially since... we must remember what was happening in egypt and syria at that time. the second thing is actually a group of negotiators who did not get on the plane. this fact is also very important, and it says that russia has huge problems in the communications system, and in the system of providing these communications, i am not saying that in the security system. the third thing is... the course of exchange itself

prisoners of war, this is another very important factor, and moscow, led by the führer, is looking for any way to collapse this situation, and blame ukraine for it. and the fourth thing, which is very important, is that today there is no more important fact, more important fragment in the war between russia and ukraine. than information and psychological attacks. all the more so, such a fact will lead russia to accuse ukraine of the biggest, most oppressive sins. i ask everyone who is interested in this fragment to find it material, it is a video and a text material about a briefing in the white house, literally an hour after this information appeared and... to listen to a journalist's question to john

kirby, who was giving a briefing at the time, how he hinted at , that ukraine, you see, violates some of the humanitarian foundations of waging war, has taken such a step, and what can you say from this, that is, it is obviously clear that for russia, for führer moskovsky, any fact in this war will to be used as a certain kind of informational attack, and in this the plan is to contact ukrainian journalists, those who take care of this field, those who write, because i simply promoted for the sake of professional interest, but what about who wrote, who is in the league, who is the underdog? i just want to say to all these people: understand that the ukrainian army complies with the norms of international humanitarian law, i have said this more than once, every... soldier

is instructed in this regard, and an officer, any officer, cannot who makes a decision in such a case to give the command to shoot. unless he is convinced that an attack is underway about for a military or military purpose, all this is studied very carefully at the relevant briefings in the armed forces of ukraine. therefore, it is inadmissible to imagine that a command was given to shoot at a non-military object, and this is in principle, and forgive me just in case, i will say, if... god forbid that this happens, then this is something that is not system, this is a kind of violation that happened as a result of certain negligent actions or oversight, which, according to ukrainian legislation, will carry

a criminal penalty. i say again, i don't want to name, but the number of those who are currently in the custody of the ukrainian military for violating international humanitarian law. it sometimes even amazes those who monitor these issues from the point of view of the un. therefore, there should be a principled position here. if such a fact caught your eye in the information circle, immediately reject it at the start, because it is what can be called in popular literature as an excess, and not a systemic command that is given in the armed forces of ukraine. we immediately understand that... the kremlin begins to signal whether it is possible to call on in some of their own closed channels, they say that this is how they can use american weapons in ukraine, and we understand that this is also a rather difficult, drastic issue for the americans. the americans, as far as i understand,

set some kind of unspoken parameter, yes, the reconquest of our territories, the return of our lands, but at the moment the issue of using long-range systems... for example, on the territory of russia, well, somehow it has not yet been adjusted, the americans have not yet matured. i did not accidentally say about the plot at the briefing in the white house, but as a confirmation, including your words are the recent message of chancellor scholz of germany that yes, we are considering the issue of supplying ukraine with long-range taurus, but we have a caveat that the ukrainian side can, you see, screw up. them in moscow, so i want to emphasize a small nuance here: there was no such direct speech anywhere, but nevertheless , this message itself, the one that is taken as direct speech in quotation marks, it was attributed to the events with

il-76 and attributed to the opposite for in order to attract attention, and once again the issue of supplying ukraine with... medium-range missiles and long range if you were to slow down and the second quote went for a walk at all funny about what you see the chancellor doesn't know about what the uk mod was offering to exchange for actually how the situation was real he said that we know such position, and left it further without any comment, instead in the means ... information came that he did not know anything about this fragment, in the first part he, as it were, said that they have reservations that the possibility of strikes by the ukrainian armed forces forces in moscow. here is a vivid example of how the kremlin uses

a number of facts in connection with this anchor that pulls the information situation, i understand that we are currently being provided with security. in particular , we understand from the big seven that we have stronger and stronger ties with great britain, and how this is best manifested by the security agreement with the united kingdom, how we should properly use the chances given to us, in principle, and how to make it so that similar signed memoranda and agreements did not repeat the same fate the so-called budapest memorandum, because there are a lot of correct and pleasant formulas, but the question is more specific... their implementation is a very important question, i would even call it the number one question today from the point of view of international aid and strengthening of those things, about that you said, the security guarantees, but right away i can't help but ask some very important questions for myself, for

all of us, this is an international agreement, and an international agreement that has a very wide impact on the domestic situation on the... external situation, but as you can see, for some reason it is not submitted to the parliament for ratification. meanwhile, the constitution clearly defines that such acts are valid only after ... consent to them is given by the parliament, verkhovna rada of ukraine. this, hold now if the information. second, if so, then i will remind everyone that the budapest memorandum was not ratified either, but it, at that time the previous constitution was still in force and it allowed similar things, including such things as the provision of external guarantees by the ministry of finance, the conclusion of those responsible. .. kind sectoral and sectoral agreements and so on, and the agreement on security and defense issues

could be called such, well, this is also a stretch, but this document, on the other hand, it cannot be unratified from the point of view of the norms of the position of the current constitution, this is the first thing that must be remembered to remember, and that's why this is here, give me the wind of the budapest memorandum, it is already home, and the second thing is... implementation mechanisms, i am still convinced today that the budapest memorandum is a very serious document, but what is missing, what is not there , and what can't be in this document, as well as in the document signed by reshisunak and president zelenskyi, this is the mechanism of its implementation, which i mean, well, the first, actually, is ratification, because then it becomes. is a law, which means that the organizational structure is being adjusted under it both in ukraine and, accordingly, in great britain, because

let me remind you that an analogue, an analogue of such a security guarantee, is an act between the government of the united states of america and taiwan, it is called the law on relations with taiwan, an act on relations with taiwan, which, not only that, was also voted on by congress. then he it was also voted in the parliament of taiwan. in this way, it is a document for two parties, and i would still recommend to ukrainian specialists who take care of this topic to take this document and look at it, how it is designed. next, if you read the signed agreement, it is limited in time and term. indeed, this is a document about two-year guarantees, and also, if we look at

international norms, then if we take away the ratification, if we understand that such an act does not carry with it an organizational system of support, then it can be interpreted just as an agreement between prime minister reshisunak and president volodymyr zelenskyi, there is one more thing that... is very important, the problem here is a matter of competence, if you look at this document, it contains components related to of the powers of the ministry of defense, the cabinet of ministers and the president, there are things that today are assigned to the competence of the president, that is, in the field of defense policy, there are specific figures that relate to money and objects, these are the affairs of the ministry of defense, well , in the extreme. case of the cabinet of ministers and so on, that is, all this suggests that

at will, if guarantees were to be obtained, obviously, due to the huge volume of these things that were discussed, the key was lost: and this is not the law for both sides, it is very important, secondly, the parliaments did not ratify it, from here it must be read absolutely clearly, its financial security will be under a big question mark. however, from the point of view of political rhetoric, this is a colossal step forward, because it is shown that great britain, but here a comma is placed further, as a country that does not belong to the european union, you have it in mind, secondly, it is like a country of the anglo-saxon bloc, of course, because it is read that way, and it is read that way, moreover, just... which belongs to the so-called copenhagen format, and this is what is placed

further in romstein and so on, she is ready to provide appropriate assistance, but at the same time there is a drawback here, the essence of which can be that only in the period of premieres from the work of the sunak, because if it is not a law, it is only a certain agreement between two persons, then she can do it exactly like this, and i do not rule out... that in some time, after when the conservatives leave power, it will be said, let the conservatives sign, let them implement such an agreement, because i say again, this is not a law. this should be understood from the point of view of norms of international, international law. you will tell me that there are even things in international law that talk about oral agreements. that's right, verbal agreements, but they are not reached in matters of security, security guarantees, especially since these two words of security guarantees, they say

that the document had to comply with the international the convention on agreements and... speech, which provides for the mandatory implementation of national constitutional norms from the point of view of actual ratification, i am not saying this for the first time, i hope that in the future, and perhaps in the case of great britain, at least ukrainian the political leadership will return to this issue and send this document to the parliament for ratification, because i do not know... for what reasons, i cannot understand, for what reasons the lack of ratification of such a document was allowed, because from the point of view of the information motive, political sounding - it's a great step, it's a great step, another matter is why they didn't reach the actual legal

basis for the actions of such a document, because you understand, when you and i are being told that what you see is not the right word in the budapest memorandum, isn't it? so translated, then in relation to this document , you and i will be told that it was not ratified, on the basis of which certain resources will be issued from the budget of one state, another state, and so on for its implementation. i completely agree with you, this is an extremely important point, it is fundamentally important moment, and let's hope that the prime minister of the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland rishi sum. will also take the necessary steps when it comes to, in particular, working with the british parliament, but in any case, such signals, they demonstrate that certain parameters of what is called a new security agreement for ukraine or a new security format for ukraine that he what can we expect from those

states, countries, blocs that we consider our allies, but currently they are our friends, partners and friends. the agreement itself, which has already been signed and the agreements that will be signed in the future, what they are talking about, that the thesis that we cannot work with nato countries with each cream, because we have to work only with nato as a whole, it does not correspond to the truth. this means that it is very important that today we all realize that the issue is regional, continental. global security is a multi-component issue. in this system, it is obvious, there can already be bilateral agreements, further, regional ones agreements, further, continental agreements, global agreements, but they can form a single entity. actually, this is what

you and i have been talking about for more than a year, as it turns out. from that new year's christmas message of the british foreign minister lees truss to the london city hall, when she spoke about the time of a labile security system, soft, and in fact, if you look at it, these are bilateral agreements , they should be aimed at ensuring security of ukraine, to ensure the security of central european countries. to ensure the security of the countries of the european continent, then to ensure the security of the countries of the north atlantic bloc, to ensure the countries of the euro-russian bloc and global security, these components, these components, they should not create a hedgehog in relation to each other, and

it is most appropriate to to select and systematize all this. definitely the romshtein format , and here it is very important to move to at least somehow the ramshtein format for today conversations on this topic, because even the first thing we talked about with you, it looks like some kind of bilateral industry agreements, because it will be read like that from the point of view, actually, now, and what does it have to do with central european? there is absolutely no security, well, what you and i are talking about is like a mirage, like an intermarium of two seas, three seas and so on, now how will it turn out in... relations in the nato system, and if we add to that, what today, europe is constantly talking about own security, moreover, the current

exercises that are being carried out by nato, which they indicate that due to the fact that the minimum invited participant is the united states of america, and the united states of america is today 90% of the security , which was implemented nato. the current exercises show that there is a selected model and legend, 90% of which are actually the countries and states of europe, and literally several destroyers of the united states of america, which of the almost 90,000 personnel participating in this exercise are present at them that is, it is as if a shot at the model that can be compiled after the statements. candidate trump that we can withdraw from nato, although this is not an answer and it is obvious that it will not happen, but, well, it is clear that preparations for this

are underway, now one more thing, it is necessary to understand that in matters of security bilateral relations that ukraine will conclude with nato states, they must be implemented in the form of concrete steps, that is, conditionally speaking, the training is going on, both conditionally... speaking, and not conditionally, realistically speaking, nato will interact with countries that wish to join nato , well, in particular, such as ukraine, further, how will they interact with those that have already formed as a separate defense alliance, well, such as, for example, ukus, the indo-pacific bloc, which separately exists today, although in some countries it is called, that is obvious from here. that one cannot do without formalizing the role played by the contact group, it really

pisses me off because i went through the contact group in minsk when i hear that ramstein is called the contact group on providing assistance to the defense of ukraine, well, as the ukrainian classics say, to contact, it does not mean to decide, you see, and all this indicates... that today, those who outline and those who sit on button of european security, and regional , european, and continental, in general and global, they do not quite clearly understand, but how all this will interact with each other, how it will cooperate, because holding additional meetings, even online meetings, it does not solve the issue of ensuring emergency provision troops are fighting passes, armored vehicles, maintenance of all this and so on. therefore, i can say that for now, if

we take the fact that the path that ukraine began to follow, signing bilateral guarantees on security, and the transition to regional security is not even visible, moreover, i do not see that they understand this problem , and because... when you listen to people like orban or people like fico, what do they think about that we will stay here under nato, and you try your best there, but they think so in vain, i will remind them of the campaign with suvorov in the alps, it is not clear why he did it there, but keep in mind that monuments to suhorov in russia are still standing, no one has taken them anywhere, so where the boot of a russian soldier can fit, only the moscow fuhrer knows that. and this should be understood very well. thank you very much, mr. ambassador, for this extremely important conversation on the air of the tv channel, i want to remind our tv viewers that now roman bezsmertny,

an iconic politician and diplomat, was working for them. vasyl zima's big broadcast. two hours of airtime, two hours of your time, two hours to find out about war and how the world lives. two hours to keep up with economic news and new. of sports for two hours in the company of favorite presenters, presenters who have become likeable to many, as well as distinguished guests of the studio, events of the day in two hours, vasyl zima's big broadcast, a project for intelligent and caring people, in the evening at espresso.

currently, miroslav czach, a public figure, historian, journalist, member of the polish diet of the second and third term, will work in the espresso studio. glory to ukraine, mr. myroslav, i congratulate you, i congratulate the heroes. donald tusk and president zelensky, denys shmyhal, met, talked, we understand, in fact, it is about a complete reset not only of certain tactical points, but

about a new vision in general. what is called the economic-social-security policy of nato's eastern flank. this story is much bigger than bilateral polish-ukrainian relations. so the meeting took place and it was symbolic that donald tusk made his first foreign visit as the head of the polish government to kyiv. poland and ukraine are starting to work on guarantees the so-called security guarantor agreement. that is , poland joined the declaration of the g7 group from vilnius from... the nato summit last year, and the development of a bilateral document similar to the one signed by great britain and ukraine during the visit of prime minister sunak in january of this year begins. this is an extremely important fact, because the government of the previous polish government, the morowiecki government, did not join this declaration, which was very significant and

very alarming. that poland is retreating from the support of ukraine. today, this page has already been turned and poland is returning to supporting ukraine in the military aspect, which was confirmed by president zelensky, who said that a package of military aid from poland is being prepared. the second result of tusk's visit to kyiv is that a very well-known person, a well-known politician, pavlo koval, has been appointed as a plenipotentiary in... tuned to ukraine, a guest of espresso, for many years, now the chairman of the committee with of foreign affairs of the sejm, that is, a prominent figure in polish politics, is responsible for this, and that person, i think, has ambitions and a desire to develop precisely this cooperation, so that these are not declarations filled with real meaning and...

now regarding the already specific the situation with agriculture, with transportation and so on, then prime minister shmygar announced the progress, and he said that a bill is being drafted in the ukrainian parliament on equalizing the rights of polish and ukrainian carriers, i think that this is not the problem is, poland is invited to poland, polish companies are invited to... the construction of the autobahn from krakow to rivne, that is, everything that actually concerns the residents of lviv and the western region, if the autobahn is built to rivne, it will greatly simplify all transportation in general, and so on , this is the second aspect, and the third is related to the fact that the work is starting, or in fact , the work is already continuing, so that in the matter of agricultural products, the export of ukrainian agricultural products to poland will not be this

stumbling block in bilateral relations. is approaching poland before the adoption of the romanian model , that is, there is an export of agricultural products, but in some part of grain, for example, corn or something, when there is too much import to poland, then the license system for ukrainian exporters is included, that is, then you have to go to the ministry and to get such an appropriate license, i think that it is in... ultimately a clear , realistic package of cooperation in those very specific cases that have been poisoning all of our lives for the last six months or more. so, nothing felt bad, so in the relationship between president zelenskyi and president andrzej duda, then the clouds began to thicken, and accordingly we received several extremely significant scandals, well , we understand that...