reshuffles, i will remind you that, for example, bernard montgomery was, if i am not mistaken, the fifth commander of the british forces in africa, the fifth in total, and, therefore, that is, well, a change of officers, even the highest ones, is normal history in the war, about the real reasons, usually society and history after, because if you start to smear the real reasons during the war, then you play into the hands of the enemy. thank you, mr. mykyta, mr. yaroslav, who is stirring up this topic with the change of the head of the armed forces of ukraine, how is it dangerous for the army, how is it dangerous for state, because we all live in a state where there is a war, the enemy is attacking us, and we have the head of the armed forces of ukraine who is responsible for it and says that i am responsible for it, we fight, we continue, all these conversations, how does it affect . on

what is happening inside ukraine? look, i will, if you allow me, approach this question a little from the other side. does mr. president have the legal right to make such a decision? the answer, like it or not, is yes. will it be well received in society? well, sociology, for now... there is the answer no will be taken badly, and now i want to bring back our discussion in a completely different way, first of all, what happened yesterday, i am quite an active user of social networks, and i can definitely confirm from my own experience that yesterday this thesis was promoted, well let's put it this way, people are close to the government, i don't understand for what reason, but - i can definitely say that it

happened, not the first persons there, not direct employees, but well connected to him, or was it just a confirmation rumor, whether it was specially heated in this way information space, but well, this is a fact, secondly , m, today several reputable publications were published with a description of the situation, which is not refuted, this is mirror of the week and bbc ukraine, maybe more - these are the ones i saw, both are reputable, both refer, as i understand it, to their sources and talk about the events of yesterday, about the meeting between mr. zaluzhny umierov and mr. president, and now the third, why it is necessary to react to this and why, unfortunately, these rumors , regardless of whether... are they true or

not, are they hitting us now? make it very simple experiment: open the main page of the financial times or the guardian right now, and you will see this news on the front page. there were more such international publications, including bbc, wall street journal and others. these editions are read by the people from whom this week is now. and maybe within a few hours the question depends on whether ukraine's funding will be extended for this year, without which it will be difficult for us, to put it mildly. this news does not help them to make a decision in support of ukraine now. i will not say that they interfere, yes, i will not be for them comment, but definitely do not help. that's why we want, or... or not, but the long reaction

yesterday and frankly speaking, well, it's quite vague in the wording that the ministry of defense, that of mr. nikiferov, because well, he's ska there , you just have to pay attention, as he commented, it's well is perceived differently, now it did not give the opportunity to stop such publications after a day, and one way or another, but now it is necessary to give some kind of signal. again, this is the prerogative of the commander-in-chief, this is a communication strategy that should be done there by the ministry of defense or the government, or the president's office, but we have to somehow give answers to those foreign publications. once again, they are not in favor of ukraine now. well, the ones you are talking about, they wrote so directly about the fact that the president did not refuse to release the head. the armed forces of ukraine are industrious, and this

will inevitably happen. ms. victoria, mr. nikita said that some political forces, or some affiliated with the political. forces, people were trying to spread this information on social networks, so in general, did you see it and do you perceive it as, let's say, a gesture in side of european solidarity? you know, at first this information began to be disseminated by telegram channels, which i would call close to banking channels, and... we need to analyze where they got this information from, then we started writing about it, i wrote about it directly, i i will tell you that i had several sources from the general staff of ukraine, i absolutely do not deny this information, and from the ministry of defense, by the way, there were also sources who said that there was a meeting, with the participation, in particular, of mr.

umerov, about the fact that it was about resignation, about the fact that it was offered to write a statement , that zaluzhny refused, yes, all these things... were confirmed, let 's not pretend that someone invented it, well , let's not, let's not have fun here and play in reality, this is the case, you know, when you really want bloggers and journalists to be to blame, but here the politicians are to blame, who should have a clear position, make a decision, make it, explain to the society and let's move on, the country is not in the conditions to do business there , i don't know, according to social standards temperatures or stamina of allies? as of now, yes, because it seems that, that is exactly what is happening today, the bbc wrote, in particular, that the decree was not published only because there were anti-allies, and you could also read that, yes, that they took it negatively, no , this was not, you know, the case when someone there

threw something into the informational flame, some kind of mere woodcutter, it had already happened many times, and that's all the things that ms. zaluzhna, who today is not fired from the position of first deputy, is doing, or simply... deputy chairman defense committee, well, she does it not just by herself, it is not her own will, yes, because otherwise her party would have told television a long time ago and would have voted accordingly, if this does not happen, well, this is an absolutely clear indicator, she is fulfilling a higher political will today, once again throwing in these topics , we are not throwing them in here, you understand, whoever is out there now reproaching us, we warn, because my text was reduced to the fact that this is not without... a painful story, so that i really received a huge feedback from absolutely yesterday of their apolitical friends, girlfriends who said: what are you doing, well, this is already us , we are very, very worried by this, it is very triggering for us, where to go, what to do in general, and here indeed, this is the case, this

it is precisely the case when answers to society must be given, say yes, we did not agree on the issues of tactics, strategy, there is another executor, and there are some other things, that's all... of course, the supreme commander has the right to do this, but to engage in a swing, when this happens all the time and such conversations take place, well, there is no smoke without fire here, this is not a made-up story, we understand it all well, and let's not tell each other something in such general terms, then surely this is not the case when we need to play with such topics, we need to decide, thank you, mr. nikita, please, well actually. to be honest, i 'm already going to give a sharp answer right now, but still, we have a lot of ties there, that means years, well, normal human relations, so it's not on a personal account, so please accept it, so, well, i i think that

completely different people are having fun, it's definitely not us, because you know, i've heard a lot over the past six months, over the past year, this is definitely not an excuse. to get out and tell, but i heard that shmygal was being replaced by markarov, everyone told or not, yes, yes, everyone told all over the hill, they stubbornly told, changed, no, they told about kubrakov, that he was replaced by the prime minister, then they told that kubrakov would be removed, removed, replaced, no, this is an excuse to stick out and tell... look, i know you have sources, just like i do, but there is responsibility for what we say publicly under wartime of course without a doubt, i fully agree that

history should have taught us, i hope that it has taught us, and that there will be no more mistakes in ukraine when the petliura shoots the most talented military leader of the ukrainian people's republic, or a bochan, because... it should have taught us by this example in particular, but history also teaches us that when we are not there, where it... was, where it was not, in the bomb shelter, in the president's office, in the office where the rate is being collected, what difference does it make, we were not there, nor me , neither yaroslav, nor you, and therefore to relate to what we are told acquaintances, and i have them too, and to relate to what we do with this information, and i just think that we have with the maximum responsibility, with the maximum, what should we do? from what we, what we all heard about, yaroslav, you, me, all of us, did not

happen, and it is not a fact that it will happen, it may happen, and then, and then there will be a conversation, you will excuse how absolutely right, how, how absolutely right you and yaroslav now point out, differences in issues of strategy, tactics, defense, offensive, a lot of issues, then before that, and now there is no fact, and we are... speculating about the lack of fact, so what are we doing, in fact, what is maryana bezugla speculating on? well, right here i can say that i consider it absolutely unacceptable, this post , which, as far as i understand, was today, it is just beyond the limit for me, there will be a faction in our country, and i, in particular, will naturally raise this issue, because it's definitely sabotage against the military leadership, whatever it is, whatever it is, maybe, you know, maybe there's some

old grudge there, you know, well, well, it's she really communicated a lot there, well, it’s a fact , it’s true, she communicated a lot with the general staff with the chief of staff, and there at the beginning, as far as i remember, it resembled such and such a moon, so it means that we are a long month, well , now it resembles there, well here i am again... it's not sexism, it reminds me of the behavior of very offended women from time to time, but then again, i don't put anything into it other than, let's say, political content, and well, but it's also absolutely irresponsible behavior on 200% irresponsibility is significant more irresponsible posts with appeals to keep unity, so don't listen to me , look here, i just gathered three people. i think that we all know exactly the price of responsibility, and i think that no one,

each of us, can blame each other for the fact that we do stupid things, and when i say that we all need to, i have my own i mean all of us, regardless of who is in which faction, thank you, mr. nikita, we will return to our studio after a short break, ladies and gentlemen, please wait. there are discounts on aquamaris of 15% in in pharmacies plantain to you and savings. kratal contains natural components that carefully care for your heart. kratal improves blood supply and the functional state of the myocardium, normalizes the heart rate , and increases physical and mental performance. kratal is a natural force for your heart. why am i here do i have left teeth, eat ice cream - pain, cold air - pain, sweet, pain. the dentist prescribed lacal

sensitive, which effectively reduces tooth sensitivity. if i had known lacalot sensitive earlier, i would not have had to come here at all. lacalot sensitive - reliable protection against pain. new york of the 19th century is luxury, scandals and intrigues. gilded age from hbo. watch all seasons of the exquisite drama in ukrainian with a subscription. turn on the aristocrat. not mega. laughter, physical activity, sneezing. even during such a small load, urinary incontinence can make itself felt. feminost uro helped me. thanks to the natural components of feminost uro, it helps to restore control over urination both during the day and at night. feminonost oro - ejaculation under control. ask in pharmacies there are discounts on ffcalor of 20% in the psyllanyk, pam and oskad pharmacies. oh, and got wet. would you like some tea? mom, dad. what to do in order not to get sick? vitamin c, d3, zinc and, most importantly, quercitin to strengthen blood vessels. just

take quertin immuno. all in one package. in one capsule, four components together. so simple, one capsule a day. so convenient. quertin immuno. vasyl winter's big broadcast. two hours of airtime, two hours of your time, two hours to learn about the war and what the world is about, two hours to be informed economic news and sports news, two hours on the computer that many have become familiar, as well as distinguished guests of the studio. events of the day in two hours. vasyl zima's big broadcast, a project for smart and caring people. espresso in the evening. verdict with serhiy rudenko. from now on in a new two-hour format. even more analytics, even more important topics, even more

top guests. foreign experts, inclusion from abroad. about ukraine, the world, the front, society. and more. feedback, you can express your opinion on the malice of the day for with the help of a telephone survey, turn on and turn on, the verdict with serhii rudenko, every weekday from 20 to 22 at espresso. a separate set of unmanned aircraft complexes sapsan of the state special service of transport. are appealing to the viewers of the espresso channel to join the collection of clothing and technical equipment for our unit. thank you, glory to ukraine! heroes! glory! friends, this is the verdict program. my name is serhiy rudenko, we

work live on the tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms. for those who are now watching us there. please. don't be stingy, please like this video to promote it on these platforms, and subscribe to our pages on these platforms, in addition, take part in our survey, today we ask you about whether you trust the commander-in-chief of the armed forces forces of ukraine to valery zaluzhny, yes no, everything is quite simple on youtube, the yes button, the no button, or write your comment under this video, if you watch us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote if you do you trust the hardworking 0.800 201 381 no 0800 2011-382. all calls to these numbers are free, call. i would like to remind you that today we have people's deputies of ukraine, viktoria syumar, mykyta poturaev and yaroslav zheliznyak on the air. i thank them for participating in this program and for sharing their thoughts with us this late evening. and,

of course, ladies and gentlemen, i have to ask you about what is happening in the parliament now. because after arahamia said that people are fleeing, or want to flee, from the faction, 17 people's deputies of ukraine, and that it can lead to a parliamentary crisis , to be honest, i can’t help but understand how, if even 20 people leave the people’s service, why is it called a parliamentary crisis, well , 20 people will leave, 10 people will leave according to the lists, they will come from the following, that 300 deputies follow the lists, in any case, it will be in order to make various decisions that are necessary, why, why the parliamentary crisis, the crisis, maybe in the service of the people, that there will not be enough people who came for the majority constituencies, maybe you know a little more victoria, you are asking me about the servant of the people, what is going on, i understand that

the problem of the monomajority of the monocoalition, it really already exists, it is really becoming more difficult to gather votes, i... the position of the leader of the faction, mr. rahamia, is connected with this, who began to publicize this because , frankly speaking, my colleagues have little reason to be tired, forgive me, i don’t think that now the ukrainian parliament is working in the mode where everyone simply put their hands and feet to work, unfortunately, probably this not even a parliamentary decision, and the parliament could to be much more active in these conditions, thank god, right now. i was personally engaged in reading the new draft law on mobilization, it appeared on the parliamentary website literally half an hour ago, the government finally submitted it to the verkhovna rada in the evening, a number of positions there are much better than they were in the previous versions of this draft law, at least disabled persons of all groups, including the third group, are not

planned to be drafted, but they are planning to introduce an electronic draftee office, so we will discuss. we will work, here we are, the position of our political power, everything that is needed for european, for euro-atlantic integration, everything that is our ideological promises to our voters, we will always support, we will not support things that will complicate the business situation today, we cannot and will never support unconstitutional things, those things in which there are risks of corruption, and we are maintaining this position today in the parliament, and i... hope that the parliament will still realize its level of responsibility to country during the period of war, it is not for nothing that the law on martial law prohibits holding elections during the period of martial law. well, it is precisely the parliamentary elections, i emphasize this , and it is probably about the fact that the legislator , as a matter of fact, even in those first convocations, he established a high level of responsibility

of the parliament in the most difficult crisis and historical situations for ukrainian society, as it has already happened in our history and in 2004 and in 2014, so we must be worthy of the trust that ukrainians still gave to today's people to the deputies, for me to hear these numbers, well... wild, thank you, mr. yaroslav, maybe, well, we will get to nikita potoreev at the very end, under the curtain, that, for him to explain what is happening there, i want to hear the first thing versions of your colleagues and viktoria syumara, yaroslav zhelezniak, what kind of crisis are we talking about, or will there be this crisis, or will there not be this crisis, let me give an answer ahead of schedule , let's go, i think the same for the castle, look, there are three of us. we know david arahami very well, but what can be said for sure about him is that accuracy in numbers is not his strong point.

there are no 17, 117, 1117 deputies. if you had asked him at the same time how many deputies there are, i am sure that the number would have been different. i know of one case. and well, there is a hunch that i am now correctly assessing and perhaps exaggerating a little, and that is why there is no crisis, there is no flow of deputies who want to submit a mandate, there is nothing to worry about, even if there was such a flow of deputies, because they just go on the list other people, in the parliament, well , quite a large number. laws are passed not just by the majority, but by the constitutional majority, despite the fact that we sometimes like to criticize each other

on the air and even in the hall of the parliament, but everyone supports those pro-state decisions that are needed, especially regarding military issues, it seems to me that 95% of them are adopted by the constitutional majority, that's why i would like to close this topic... and if you want proof of my words that precision in the figures of the head of the coalition is not a strong point, remember his own forecast, then when the law on mobilization is introduced, i will remind you , there was january 25, that is that victoria mentioned that only on january 30 they introduced a draft law, so don't pay attention, believe me, save more nerves and strength. thank you, mr. nikita. but, well, i will say that i

have not seen these 17 statements. i think that in principle, if they exist, then no one except davyd georgiyovych has seen them either. i, well, in principle agree with my colleagues that, well, if people even begin to compose of their own accord, their own. and powers, well , the parliament is not threatened with a crisis of existence as such, yes, well, because it really is, so, well the majoritarians, if they will leave the parliament, yes, it is unpleasant, because there is no one to replace the majoritarian, if the list members, then it is clear that the list is simply moving forward and the problem is solved, well, i would rather tell you , then, such a conversation in which i took part so recently, it does not apply. absolutely means davyd georgiyovych and 17 statements. i won't even say who was involved in that conversation, uh, and it's not, it's not a hint

that arahami was there, but this is what the conversation was about , i think you'll understand that, well , actually we really, like yaroslav now said, with a very frequent constitutional majority , we adopt very good laws, when we agree, we generally have 300 plus on the scoreboard, and according to the calculations of our public... analytical centers there, we have many reform laws, really good ones, those that are there and european integration , macro-finance and so on, but no one likes us, anyway, in general, so everyone is on social networks, so they are training, who will say the worst about the deputies, we are all thieves, we all do nothing, all of us need to the front, the conversation was precisely about the fact that no one advocates for us, so we adopt good laws. so, together with our western partners, even if someone says a good word about the parliament, it means that, in principle, all the experts of ukrainian society say that yes , they have good laws, they are really good people there,

but somehow civil. society does not protect us very much, the media, so, well, also , it means that parliamentarians are not protected very much, it doesn’t matter, it doesn’t matter which faction, but if they were, then one would imagine that tomorrow the parliament would just get offended and disband, and they would be left without a parliament, which means they would be left alone with a government and a president, and there would be no more parliament, but it was like that... so, well, really with humor , so, well, a conversation about, you know, this, then, a network network assumption, so, such a thought experiment, so, you know, here actually, if we talk about the parliamentary crisis, then i would speak exclusively from this angle, yes , because, well, victoria is not quite right, c every parliament has people who work, there

are not many, me, well, me, for example. an example with the law on religious organizations, i worked with my colleagues on saturday and sunday, the last ones, which means, well, there are people who work a lot, and we are all people, meaning that in session mode, this parliament meets once every two weeks, and this is actually unique for the ukrainian parliament, it is not reflected in the age, well, it is not reflected in our bill, well, let's analyze the number of bills that were considered. many now take the agenda, which is there will be submitted to the court of appeals, there are a lot of laws and zavitnevych, and there are also laws on makrafin, so, well, listen, we really have many , many useful laws together, compared to the last convocation, sorry, you weren’t there, we worked, in your last convocation you had a button, but we don’t have it in our joint convocation, so the kd is a little bit,

maybe because of the lack of a button , it suffers a lot, but nevertheless, i know that maybe we just need to work another day, well in session mode, everything is fine, look, it's not me i think that this will change, because the total number of days we work corresponds to the pre-war period, which means, colleagues, i know you, but what am i talking about as a person who was in both convocations, we are all living people, and we work. and it does not matter who is in the opposition, who is in power, we really do a lot of useful things and things that are necessary for us as living people . we won't get it, and by god, mr. nikita, we have to finish our program, i have to say kind, kind words to you, but watch this

tv channel from the press, probably not the only one? a tv channel where representatives of all factions, well, the main factions, both pro-government and opposition, have gathered, and they can discuss, but we were thrown out of t2, that is, two years ago, no one wants to return, we do not understand what is happening at all, yesterday journalists met with ambassadors of the big seven, talked about what is happening in the country, in your absolute capacity, to protect journalists... to do your best, to show that ukraine is democratic state, do everything to ensure that journalists have access to the verkhovna rada of ukraine, to deputies, to decisions, then we will say that we really have wonderful deputies, and we can speak well of them, mykyta poturaev, yaroslav zheleznyak, victoria syumar, were guests of our program today, ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating

in the program, during our program we conducted. survey we asked you about the following: do you trust a hard worker? 94% yes, 6% no, it's on tv, on youtube 96% yes and four no they trust, this is the ratio of figures, i put a full stop on this, this is the verdict program of serhii ordenko, i say goodbye to you until tomorrow at 20:00, goodbye.