economy, he helped the invaders steal ukrainian grain, at the same time calling this theft help. the russian federation is helping agricultural producers more than ever, and today we allocated more than 400 million rubles in the form of subsidies. the kherson regional prosecutor's office informed zbarovsky about the suspicion of collaborative activity. the court found him guilty and sentenced him to 10 years in prison with confiscation of property, although so far... it's all in absentia. meanwhile, at the position of the nizhny syrohosky gauleiter, another salesman appeared, local resident evgeny pirog. he was born in 1983. before the full-scale invasion of russia, pirozhok, as the locals call him, served in the crimea. during the occupation and illegal annexation of the peninsula, he sided with the occupiers. ukrainian law enforcement officers opened criminal proceedings against him for desertion. however, the pie hid from the investigation. came into the spotlight again in the summer

of 2022, when he once again became the first deputy of the gauleiter of nizhny syrogoz and a candidate from putin's united russia party on the fake elections to occupation authorities. in the spring of last year, pirog voluntarily agreed to head the occupation administration of the nizhny syroho community. here he is reporting to the traitor saldo how well he has studied the area entrusted to him. nizhnyosyrogoz municipal district. of settlements - 23 settlements, the number of inhabitants - 8100 people, more are arriving, there are such repeated cases that people arrive from the mainland. the tumultuous career of this pie with a rotten filling ended as suddenly as started the center for journalistic investigations reports that the russian occupiers decided to get rid of his services and threw him into the basement, allegedly for fraud with stolen property. for

some time , the traitor was allowed to go out in the world of god to record a video greeting for his compatriots on the occasion of the reunification day, and then he was arrested again and sent to the dungeons, he helped torture ukrainians, now he himself knows what the putler torture chamber is, that's how it should be to this traitor. at the end of november , the sbu informed pirog about the suspicion, but i have an assumption that this the seller will never leave again. and who is the occupier? was appointed the new gauleiter of nizhniy syrogozy, he became such a forty-six-year-old vladyslav nikytenko. it is known that he is the director and co-owner of the company ecobutkon, which previously won multimillion-dollar tenders for the overhaul of educational institutions in the kherson and odesa regions. that's how he earned money from the ukrainian state, and then betrayed him. according to locals , after the occupation, nikitenko immediately sided with the enemy, put pressure on business representatives and teachers. forcing them to cooperate with

in rushes despite the fact that we are in a territory that is constantly being shelled from the right bank. despite the fact that they are trying in every possible way to spoil the new year's holiday, it should be a holiday. we'll still raise our toasts to victory, and no matter what, we'll have a christmas tree. so. yes, somewhere we have already heard it. what an important christmas tree for the new year and we remember how it all ended. they poked their heels for hours. i am sure it will be the same with these traitors. when our servicemen vacate the occupied territories, you will also have a christmas tree, more precisely, a christmas tree, and such an already familiar prison, only ukrainian. that's why we keep our lines, donate to the armed forces and believe in the victory of ukraine, so that not a single traitor. had no place on our

holy land. it was the program collaborators and i, olena kononenko. if you have information about kremi sellers, write to us at this e-mail address or simply on facebook. together we will send all the traitors in pursuit of the russian ship. see you in a week on espresso. welcome to the espresso channel. today , the main topic of our program is war and weapons determined the new attitude of the holocomovist valery zaluzhnyi. it appeared on cnn, someone called it a column, but it's actually a big and really conceptual article called "the changing design of war." in it, golovmanovych valery zaluzhnyi says that for each... war it is necessary to find its own

unique strategy and logic, which will allow one to find a way to victory already in new conditions, quite symptomatically, which is necessary. traditionally uses powerful foreign media to convey its thoughts and concepts, and for ironically, the same cnn literally the day before yesterday reported that this week president zelensky will remove valery zaluzhny from the post of commander-in-chief, why, why, what will it matter, this is a question, let's say, of a political and psychological level, here in an article called the design of war , which changes, it is about the court. military plans and challenges facing our armed forces, which must be implemented in order to be successful on the battlefield, including, in particular, the creation of, for example, a completely new state system of technological

rearmament, which can be achieved in 5 months, zaluzhnyi writes, says that our partners hold the same opinion. so what does it mean. the commander, when he prepared and wrote and presented such a rather difficult to understand article, how it correlates with the amount of foreign aid, the strategic plans of our partners and the capabilities of our defense industry. we will talk about all this with professional experts and industrialists in our war and weapons program. my name is serhiy sgurets, i am the director of the information and consulting company defense express, which, together with the espresso channel , aims to cover the most relevant trends in the life of our army and the defense-industrial complex, and now we are joined by oleksiy yizhak, an expert of the national institute of strategic studies, mr. oleksiy, i congratulate you, i am glad to see you and listen, i congratulate you, did

you have the opportunity to read zaluzhnyi's article, because there are many questions about this material, and i just looked, i had today. it is planned to read, it's just for work, it will be necessary, i just looked up how a political phenomenon is such an article. well, if we talk about the beginning, then about the article as a political phenomenon, why did it appear just now, why did it become involved in foreign media, and in fact, why can we consider that this article offers a new philosophy of military thinking and a new design in management approaches. hostilities, well, in principle, it has already become popular in such publications, let me remind you that it started with an economist, there was an article by izaluzhny, then there was an article by the president, the supreme commander-in-chief, and

an article by the director of foreign affairs that was not yet noticed intelligence, now cnn has gone, i would say cnn, it's less important, it's still more... politics, because cnn, well, it's very popular, but the level of trust is not, of course, like that of the economist , because the economist is what the elites read in the morning, cnn is what forms such public consciousness, and, well, maybe now is the time to convey to such public, more public understanding in the west. what is happening in ukraine, including in the context, in the context of those electoral processes that are there in the united states have begun, i do not rule out that this is also to explain to the voters in the united states within the framework of their internal, well, preferences, in general decisions, what

is happening in ukraine, why ukraine should win, although, of course, this is an article, well, it carries a philosophy, a philosophy of understanding , what is war. in today's conditions, in principle, in this regard, perhaps it is timely, and it can be explained by the fact that, in principle, it seems so, if you look at how the signals are transmitted from the so-called high-quality american media, they also do not really understand what to do with this war, or or be endlessly in active defense, there is de-occupation. new operations next year, or start something already before the nato summit, or give, or not give, or otherwise miss, miss money and weapons, so among such hesitations, i think, well, the signal

is important, that after all, the russian-ukrainian war , this is the main thing now, what is happening in the world in the sense of security, all other wars are less significant, although... also, it is also happening in the middle east, well, i think, in the far east there is a less threatening situation, and in this the war can be won, more... also , it seems to me, there is such a signal, well, if, well, if there is no resource for mobilization inside ukraine, limited human resources, well, it is necessary to explain to our partners that human resources are not enough, we need , technologies are needed, and still , even in such a situation, it is possible to win, i will add a few comments from my own vision, then i have the impression that, in fact, now... from zaluzhnaya offers the concept of introducing hostilities, which is oriented there on achieving effects, this and

a concept that may have been practiced there in the united states, and this is actually a third way between a war of attrition and annihilation, which, in principle, now dominates the perception of the ukrainian-russian war. zaluzhnyi proposes to rise to a level when, in the planning of military operations and the implementation of actions, we will focus on those effects. which will influence the behavior of the enemy, in particular, as was the case with the use of the same robotic platforms in the black sea, when russia has an advantage, but these eyes are technologically asymmetric approaches provide a completely new effectiveness with the use of the limited means that the ukrainian army currently has, it is precisely this approach that, in my opinion , is embedded in this article, but the article is very difficult to understand in my opinion, it is rather designed for military experts. .. those who understand all these nuances, i think, why was such a complex material

presented by the general at the current stage, will it really have the effect he is counting on? well, a little motherly, but still it seems to me, materials of this class, it is not as powerful as publishing in dekonomist, then there should already be something here, something so professional. well , there are some specialists there, but maybe we should still give other publications that are calculated on and political signals and gave such signals that our military was able to provide, well, on that, well, if we compare our messages with by russians, well, our military does not have such pr'. company, well , let me remind you that there are 200 people in the pool of personal pr staff at shoigu, and they are always doing something

they say, our armed forces may not yet have such a service that would correctly say in what capacity, what is needed, what is needed and how to submit, but in principle, well, in the end, this is a combat general with a lot of experience, he says what he knows and where he can. i do not rule out that in a sense, in principle , those who read this article will understand what, well, i would call it, what i feel in those theses, which theses that are generally heard now, they are also from the side of our partners , they consist in the fact that even if the front will not move for a long time, the war can do anything one thing, everything around the front can turn, and the result of the war. now can be determined not only on the front line itself, but by the expansion, the expansion

of the combat zone in depth, and perhaps in order to expand in depth, not so many troops are needed, but new technologies are needed, the idea is possible that the expansion of hostilities to a great depth, proving the fact that last summer seemed a little inappropriate to us on the part of the americans, they said that... that the russians would not be able to keep the occupied territories in peace, but also it will be difficult to de-occupy, and that is why we need to consider various other diplomatic options there, well, maybe it is the same modernization, but with the conclusion that it is too early to negotiate, because the very fact that these territories cannot be held by the russians, and this will force them to change and his... policy , well, this is the message, it is difficult to convey, but in the end, as our first

president said, we have what we have, against the background of this, can this be, relatively speaking, still a coordinated step with our american partners because we know about what our analytical structures, american structures, are currently engaged in the process of working out the new look of the ukrainian army and new approaches to conducting combat operations. actions with a bet on technology, on asymmetric approaches, and actually this language, which is taught in zaluzhnyi's article with the word effects, for example, because effects are just an introduction. combat operations with the achievement of an effect - these are actually elements from the american concept of conducting hostilities, which now actually dominates in the american theoretical environment, or it can be considered, in fact, that this is an echo of those requests to ukraine, what will be your war strategy there or what will be your strategy for victory, and this article says that the strategy will be like this, with the basis of such solutions and

such technological approaches, which in principle agree with the vision of america... american experts, who could also be involved in such justifications, could there be such a version, or do you see it differently? well, of course, everything here is consistent with the fact that what is heard from our partners, in general, they are the discussions that are going on now, the discussions about how long it is necessary to be in active defense before the start of the new phase of funding, or for a whole year, and then, but all this is agreed in principle. i would also say here, well, if you look at it this way, is this not new, the development of new military theories, i will remind you that in the 90s, the united states started this trend, which is now worldwide, planning is based on potentials, before different scenarios were considered, and then the united

states realized that when there are many uncertainties, it is necessary to find such steel or stands, as it is now... potentials that will always be needed for anyone, for any scenario, so this purely military theory, planning based on potentials, it also became a political theory, very quickly. i do not rule out that now the same military theory is emerging, planning is based or the introduction of hostilities is based on effects. well, i do not rule out that there is such an opinion, well, check, test. certain military theories, but in general there is nothing here that does not agree with what, in principle, is heard from our partners, just wondering why, why is it so difficult and why everything, it is interesting from the point of view of a politician, but i think if experts read all this, and i am talking about myself, i think if i read it, i will see this sense, specifically military,

but why, why in the cnn and why, why is it so difficult? well, here you can only think for now, well, really, because for me these questions also remained unanswered, that is, in fact , the conceptual article is good, written in a difficult way, for understanding, it is available to experts who know the entire background of changes in approaches there conducting hostilities, and why the snn, really , let's say this, there is a question whether there were all these political insurance factors in it, that in particular there is a question about... the removal of zaluzhny, about his replacement there, and then zaluzhny, relatively speaking, something like this trolls those politicians who believe that the introduction of hostilities is a simple matter, that you can come to the battlefield, distribute tasks, and there the military will run forward, he wants to possibly raise the level of discussion to such a level that this white noise related to still fighting simply to

he still stepped aside, and then it really came to the fore in... conducting hostilities as an art that requires a certain potential, and certain knowledge and certain opportunities. in a certain way , of course, well, it is hard not to notice that there is such and such a correlation, that processes are taking place in ukraine, and there is already a look into the political future, who will be who after this war, and something is already happening, well, if we go back... . even before the military actions, if you believe what the foreign media write, they write that the meaning of the current discussion between the political authorities and military, it consists in the fact that the military will say: give us half a million people, and give us a material resource in order to change the situation on the battlefield, and the political

authorities answer: you will not have half a million, because ukraine... is tired, find , or we will find others who will liven up the situation on the battlefield, well, the answer continues, well , if there are no people, let’s work with technologies and find new options, but there is still such a message here, well, the problem is fundamental, if, if there are no people on on the battlefield, if the mobilization of half a million is a certain problem, then anyone on the battlefield will not change anything and... and if the task of political power is to change the war without moving the front, then the existing military leadership, which already has experience , it can also... it can do it, but then we need to set a task: well, uh, let 's say publicly that there will be no more people on the battlefield, we need to work with what is there,

well, of course there is a little rotation, and find other options, and the military leadership, the military system leadership, which has already developed in these two years, it can cope with it, i do not rule out that such a signal is also a. well, at least in such a way that our partners understand it, they are no longer interested in dealing with who does not like whom in ukraine and who is doing what, they need the system to work, someone should explain what the problem is with mobilization, they are and so they know, well, what you will do, well , they explain what they need to do, but again, this question remains, why in cnn and why is it so difficult, well... maybe in a different form there was no, well, then the question is what to do? in any case, these technological approaches, they are conceptually correct in essence, but in order for

them to work, they need a certain period of time, when they will give effect to the situation on the front line, and we will now have such a certain gap of capabilities, when we have lack the basic tools to maintain the situation on the front line, and then the question arises, what do you think about the ... the arrival of american assistance for these political decisions, is there a risk that they will be dragged out for so long that it will really create significant problems for our line of defense where it passes now, well , we have to save now, i think in principle that as far as ammunition is concerned and well, ammunition, what is being produced now, it has basically been paid for a long time ago. well, here it does not depend so much on the current decision-making, the current decision-making is precisely calculated for further technologies that will allow decisively

to bring the war to victory in order to get, well, we need old weapons , we need old weapons to keep the situation on the front but as i understand it, in addition to the fact that it is necessary to maintain the situation at the front and wait until the defense industry in europe and... the united states, regarding the production of old weapons that they did not plan to produce already, or they will raise production to those levels that ukraine needs, i think it should happen by the end of the year, but we have to live until the end of the year, and now we need to find these old calibers, or i, or the idea is raised, or give us your old weapons, a10 is quite suitable for compensation for... giving ammunition on the battlefield is better than the su-25, you have a lot of them, you took them out of production, come on, this is one question, i think, in principle, to maintain

the situation on the battlefield, in principle , there is enough money, or there is enough and a lot has been paid, what is currently being produced in the factories has been paid for, money is needed to find a little bit there in south korea, somewhere like that, there are knowledge... there are still calibers that are not enough, but to get new technologies, well, we need this, we need this money , this money is needed, and perhaps this is also the subject of the discussion, that technologies are needed, this is a language that our partners understand, technological development, there is a green transition , and here are the necessary technologies, including the war should become technological without large human sacrifices, well, maybe in this way, in this way... in this way, the opinion is also conveyed that it is necessary after all to give money for new technologies that will allow , in principle, well, everyone is talking about what

many people are saying, well, in fact, russia is not that strong, it has its own problems, they hide them, but they are there, and maybe it's really simple give more long-range weapons than all, for all these technologies, long-range weapons that will allow to work in the entire occupied territory. in large volumes, well, more technological, but still not the most modern systems, this will also solve the situation, well, something revolves around this, but again, we will repeat it again, it is difficult to say why it is so complicated, why everything, and mr. oleksiy, here is the last question, maybe there will be a short answer, nuland, the deputy director of the us for political affairs is visiting kyiv. and based on the results, he says that putin will receive some pleasant or unpleasant things there surprises on the battlefield for

ukrainian success. of the army, what surprises can we be talking about, can we talk about the fact that there will be some decisions in particular that did not happen before, well , in particular, there will be strikes on the territory of russia with american means, the transfer of some samples that were not planned before, do you have any assumptions to this optimistic statement nouland? and with regard to the american permission on the territory, everyone is hoping for it, i think that it can be applied for... aerial purposes, it is possible now, is it possible to apply it on the ground for the territory of ukraine, i am not sure, i do not rule out that there are additional conditions, well, there should be a rebranding, nothing, but there is a storm in the swamps, there should be something like that, a ukrainian rocket. let me remind you that we talked about zaluzhnyi's article, the new war design, with oleksiy yezhak, an expert

of the national institute of strategic studies. the article is extremely interesting, powerful , it reflects certain realities, but we will continue to analyze it in other dimensions related to our defense industry, because it also says that our defense industry is too regulated, it is necessary change approaches, look for new solutions and resources, but we will talk about this in our second part of the program, and now with the advertising and information block. big ether. vasyl, two hours of airtime , two hours of your time, two hours to learn about the war and what the world is like, two hours to keep up with economic and sports news, two hours in the company of your favorite presenters, presenters who have become familiar to many , as well as distinguished guests of the studio, events of the day in two hours, vasyl zima's big broadcast, a project for intelligent and caring, in the evening for espresso.

i will continue. our war and weapons program, we are primarily talking about valery zaluzhny's article, which appeared on the cnn resource, the design of war, which is changing, it talks about the need for technological changes, about the need for the development of our defense industry, about the need to make more ammunition , about a certain formalization in the management of our defense industry, and about these and other aspects related to our defense industry and the state... privately and we will talk with our guest, we are joined by chairman of the all -ukrainian union of employers of the federation of construction industry and head of the ukrenmash corporation vitaliy nemolostivy, mr. vitaliy, i congratulate you, i am glad to see and hear, i congratulate you and the audience, i would like to start with zaluzhny's article, i am not sure, for sure, what you had it's time to familiarize yourself with it, because it is extremely large and complex, with another.

on the other hand, he says one of the theses, which refers to the fact that the defense industry is currently regulated in a certain way in ukraine, it is necessary to look for certain approaches in order to unblock the work of our defense industry, but in any case , i would like to hear a little from you about the work of our defense industry, because against the background of the fact that a number of inspections by law enforcement agencies ... of various entrepreneurs, various structures that affected the efficiency of work were taking place , then there was an appeal to the president that, in fact, it is necessary to stop such unpredictable actions on the part of the regulatory bodies, and how it now affects the work of the defense industry from the point of view of our law enforcement agencies, and how the existence of our defense industry should be changed in view of those the needs that general zaluzhnyi talks about.

thanks for the question, i really haven't had time to read the article yet, but from what i 've heard from you, well, there's nothing new for me, and experts know that we have an ineffective defense industrial complex management system, we're talking about it we're already talking, well, i'm talking about it, for example, 15 years ago, the first program that was prepared normally from formation and development of the defense-industrial complex of ukraine was dated august 2008 , it began to be implemented, if its implemented, then by 2013 we would actually have no private defense sector left, it would remain only on sensitive such things, well, which cannot be transferred into private hands, for example, there is a system for protecting communications or removing information and so on and

so on further, special chemistry. those things that are necessary.