there is a moment in the film itself, i watched it , i was just wondering how it all looks, and when, then, this master is criticized at a meeting of the writers' union for the wrong essay, and the editor-in-chief of the magazine in which the essay was printed stands up, say, a terrible piece, and the entire circulation of his magazine that it was printed in should be burned by his decision, and these producers are just doing scenes from this movie in real life, and everyone is discussing it, and i and... it might seem like a sign of freedom of thought, if it didn't happen again every 20 years, the same question arises: what did you do for 20 years? what is wrong with you, how can it be that you are discussing all this? then there is such a brave actor, you know, leonid yarmolnyk, who currently supports the war in ukraine, he means in this previous film master and margarita, he played one of the representatives of... this world, woland

, and everyone said: well, what kind of person did he play in master margarita, she showed what evil is, and now she supports evil, in the new film version, yarmulnyk also plays, plays a doctor, a sadist, which, therefore, tortures honest people, writers, those who, therefore, against all this horror in a psychiatric hospital, at the same time play, at the same time in real life behave like this sadistic doctor, again, or. so it's kind of, you know, i'd say it's dementia, but i like more of a different image of the dementors in harry potter, these people just feed on death and they get some incredible pleasure, and i 'll tell you that when i watched it , i think, lord, i'm watching it now not even for aesthetic reasons, but for professional reasons. but i'm with

10 years since i began to study and read all this there, even there from the age of eight, i read all the time and actually see, when i touch russia, the same thing, trials, denunciations, buckets denying what he himself did, this definitely, the most terrible person is the one who does not deny and is shot, today you support the regime, tomorrow you are imprisoned for what you supported, you cannot keep up with the change of rules. ugh, people who stay in russia say to those who left, what can you understand about us, you are just deserters, you threw the country into difficult times, and here we are trying to survive, and therefore, according to what you understand about russia, the russian people, and here and there the same thing is repeated constantly, in a circle, the horror of the situation is that, as i look, and i understand that here i lived in this together with... with

them in this country there in the soviet union, then in russia i lived with them for 20 years, nevertheless, i watch now, relatively speaking, ukrainian films, no i can say that this is the most talented cinematography that i have ever seen in history, although there are many interesting original talented works, but not many, but even, i would say, not very talented ukrainian films from the point of view of aesthetics, from the point of view of the approach to work, from the point of view of the actors' performances, these are not soviet. cinema , ugh, and there it is for them, they continue to play in such a way that i begin to understand the unfortunate stanislavsky, who kept telling his actors that he does not believe, because they themselves do not believe in what they are playing, in principle, art is really about something deep deep in a person, and they play to survive, to become folk artists, to please the public, which is just as cynical , ugh, and again... and they say it to

their faces, that's what master margarita is, that's this volend in moscow, when he shows that these are cynical, vile people, and they they say, oh, well, it's so great that you're on us, well , oh, how brave, and continue to live like this, why are you watching this then, what's the point of all this, absolutely, well, you know, we have a large number of people who go to these movies, the theaters are full, so not all is lost, but all is lost, because you do it all the time, you do not draw conclusions, you mentioned nadezhdin, this is an interesting moment, this is really a moment that means that a large number of people are against the war, and that, here they are, i left, i put signatures on my clear conscience, i continue to sit and i'm watching master margarita, huh, did i go to some theater to see some wonderful performance, if i'm a professor. at some

university or just a high school teacher there, i signed up for nadezhdina, whatever else you want from me, by the way, about nadezhda, you understand why we are still like this. about the mass mass demonstration of such disloyalty to the government, and you understand that the poor man with hopes, who was basically a systemic politician until this moment, just wanted to play some kind of game, he created some small staffs for himself in small rooms, so small, so small, they sit there little people with little pieces of paper, little pens in them, everything small, so tiny , so tiny that no one would notice, everything tiny, like in lily puta. and here people start walking, people are not small, they are of such a normal size, there are many of them, if it were a normal headquarters, they would have signed and left , but a person has to push through to these small people, they gathered, they thought there would be 50 people, but 50 00 came there, they

don’t even have ink designed for such a number of people, i’m not saying, that it is necessary to check the reality of signatures, documents, and there are no people, no one was going to, of course now there... did not believe in what he initiated, or did not initiate in order to prove something , of course, now, of course, this boris nadiezhdzhin, he simply already felt that he is a serious figure, this is what happens in politics, do you remember how it was with svitlana tykhanovskaya, she just won the presidential elections, maybe she didn't even intend to, she just wanted to show that she was an alternative candidate, and lukashenko didn't mind, he just lost here, well , realistically speaking, we understand that he lost the election, so here too, huh. putin and kirienko are now sitting, he was once an adviser to kirienko, so everything and they think, well, this is all very good, and then it is not known who will go with his small staffs, we will write him in the ballot, he will get 70% of the votes, what will we do, how will we rig it, i

don't think it will be 70%, the point is that with , let's say, nadezhdin's previous program plan, shortening of the svo, i'm sorry. moved to the first item from the seventh, if i'm not mistaken, that is, he felt that a part of the population of the russian federation has a request for this in principle, and he makes it the flagship of his political, if the majority of people really want the end of the war in russia, that's not the case that's the question, do you believe in it, if you can imagine it now, i just don't, and that's why i i ask you, in the editorial office, it is hoped that no territories should be given up, but that we should simply stop shooting. yes, we know for sure the number of people who can vote for it, yes, the winner of the ukrainian presidential elections also did not say that he was going to give some of our territories to russia, however, he said that we should just stop shooting, how many people voted for that, 73%, i assure

you that nadizhdin also has exactly this 73%, if fair elections were held in russia, then it is precisely for this program that we stop where there is and... and in general, these khokhlas were supposed to give us our territories in the kherson and zaporizhzhia regions, why are they shelling them? it’s completely calm, it’s a looking-glass, but it’s true, it’s a different looking-glass, you know, not putin’s, and putin, by the way, as a person trained by the experience of the 2020-2019 ukrainian presidential elections , he’s not an idiot, he understands it perfectly, people in general, most people. does not really want the war, but she wants to have all the results of the war, and these people, of course, they are in favor of the continuation of the war are the so-called participants of the svo, lumpen, who just wants to be there take a rifle, kill someone, get good money, because there are no other opportunities to earn , these people are not there, but these people are not as

many as it seems, in reality, and these people may also think that they already have their cars there, lada kalino , someone has already died, he has no other son. the war will continue, everything that is needed is already there, a grave, a car and money, so again, this means that only a conditional part of the nomenclature can stand for the war, it is also unknown which, to what extent they now need to live under sanctions, and the conditional part of potential new ones participants of the so-called svo, all others, both those who are against the war and those who have already earned from the war, they want the status quo, that everything is already over, and there are exactly as many of them as there are, that's why. i believe in such and such an opinion. i do not believe that the majority of russians want to return what they have stolen. i think she has an idealistic view of the russian people. i believe that the russians want to capture as much as they have captured. and, since it is difficult

to go further, and stop, at the moment. then, if president nadizhjin tells them in 5 years, that there is an opportunity to occupy the kharkiv region, they will not'. if, if easy, uh, they don't like to fight, so it's hard, but they've been doing it for two years with us, not they, he, he. they don't, they just accept it, but if they have an alter, they have no alternative, let me remind you, they have putin and everything, but they have an alternative: to continue fighting without any real results, because they see that there have been no results since the 22nd year, they even lost what they conquered, uh, kherson oblast, kharkiv oblast, or just stop now, nadejen tells you simply, we are stopping, we are conducting peace talks, moreover, we understand the results, we will go to europe again, there will be no sledges. russians can be aggressive, there will be, there will be planes

, there will be opportunities to fly to a resort somewhere, but now there is none of that, that too, don’t forget that, of course, not all of russia thinks that way, but millions of people who live in moscow and st. petersburg, there are many of them, they are not small cities, they are huge metropolises, so that's it and there is, and they will vote on it later. they say that he will be elected president for hopes, well, i will not be elected, but then there will be the zelenskyi effect , it will turn out that no one is going to agree with this, that the ukrainians are saying, listen , we can agree on peace, but please leave the occupied territories, the west he says, that's all, we very much congratulate the new russian president, we want to have contact with him , we will cancel the sanctions, just please, let 's return to international law, comrade nadezhdin, and everyone says, what else did he deceive us, huh. and here there will be problems this president nadezhdin, whether to really return to international law or not, he

can act like gorbachev from afghanistan, and then all this will collapse, as you understand, because the russians, as soon as they see that the state is weak, they begin to destroy their own state , this is a well-known fact, or he will say: no, we will be here, peace, friendship, chewing gum, but what is ours is ours and what is not ours is also ours, and it will be so new anyway. the type of mode that doesn't attack but doesn't give back, aggressive, ugh, that might as well be what's trying there agree with the party on the partial lifting of sanctions in exchange for not firing on ukrainian territory, but again, this is hypothetical, i do not believe that they, that is, i believe that comrade putin will never allow himself such a risk, that is, that he or not will it reliably allow to be in, as it is called, in the ballot, or will it be able to cheat like that? the situation, if it is allowed to be on the ballot, there will be a crisis in russia, as you know,

recently a group of acquaintances returned from work in georgia, and they were very surprised to see russians marching in potbilisi with posters of their regions and regions, and this is a kind of demonstration in support of nadezhdin and this whole movement, and this is a lot of people, some obscure person with a complicated political biography was enough. people just show up, that is, it means that people have, well , again, this is the belarusian moment of the 20th year, so much so, everyone gets that it doesn't matter who, simply, simply, for you, for us, for you went somewhere, huh, and it was the same as with lukashenko, and the same with putin, so they are simply fed up with putin, because they already see that it is inadequate, well, it is really inadequate, and that it is adequate, that this, all that is happening... even the last two years there, not 10, can be called adequate? well, you and i would not name it, but sometimes, hearing

russians, many questions arise from this, but we do not have any sociology, we do not have any real sociology, we understand that people can also beware of sociologists, there is still a huge problem here, precisely russian society, when there is not only a question of survival, but if you want a question... uh, lies for the sake of lies, that people lie to everyone case, it's always been the same, and by the way, this is a huge problem, you know, these people who try to analyze russia, i once read this in richard pipes, i didn't make this up, in a well-known specialist on the soviet union, who says that a huge the problem of all these people who were dealing with russia at that time was that russians lie for the sake of art, a western person, when you lie, and this, by the way, also applies to us, that we, when we want to tell a lie, we have.. . some purpose, in russia it is simple, i have met with it many times, and

then i had to reorganize when i began to live permanently in ukraine, because these are different mentalities, the society of the nation, when ukrainians, yes, when a ukrainian takes you, you understand that he wants to achieve something, and you begin to analyze why you were deceived, what is behind it, in the end, sometimes you can come to some conclusion, you may not, but you understand that it was done on purpose, and the problem with the russians is that they simply lie, you are looking for some meanings, and not them it was, you just wanted to deceive you, well to put it simply, it's a well-known fact that... it seems to me that any person who happens to be in moscow, and you too , don't get used to it right away, people deliberately send you in another direction, huh, you , how to come, fortunately gadgets have appeared, yes, but now all this is blocked so that there are no drones, you are terrible, we return to our old dialogue with muscovites, how

to get to kirova street, and they send you to gorka street , knowingly, they are just deceiving you, they are pleased. that you will go in the other direction, you will go somewhere, and and you begin to think , they must have been visitors, they didn't know, they don't come, they just like to tell you a different route, and that's when you understand it, you start living in, well, what's it called, in a more realistic world, and you never in your life go to the address that is pointed out to you, at least you should ask again. and that's what this russian folk tale is about, that it was ivan tsarevich who got to kamen and there are three routes and everyone knows where. there is no guarantee that if you go there, you will have a great time, that baba yaga will not rape you there. maybe baba yaga specifically wrote that she is having a great time, you have to be old, it is better to go

to a place where you are told that you will lose your horse. it is better to lose a horse than to be raped. babu yoga, but don’t wait for vasilisa the beautiful , don’t believe in the recommendations of the workers issued by the russian publishing house, so, and this is what we need to understand, because this is an important issue in the future negotiations with the russians, if they ever happen, it also believes in you our president, well, he should understand what is already there baba yaga is sitting, so to speak, has already melted the stove and is thinking whether to eat it with horseradish or with e. there is garlic, and that's bi, and that's all that worries her, not how to come to an agreement with him, but that under which sauce it will be tastier, ugh, that's all , mr. vitaly, let's talk a little about the middle east, these days the united states of america struck targets that are related to iran in iraq and syria, this happened in response to a drone attack on the american base in jordan a little earlier, a difficult

situation around the yemeni houthis, they there they issued a statement that... they will damage the optical fiber, which actually stretches along the bottom of the red sea and plays an extremely important role, when we are talking about the systems of civilization that exist on our continent, and not only on our continent, they do not really exist anymore , they are very functional, you see, the black sea is no longer functioning somewhere, does not exist, it turned out that it could be so, remember when this unfortunate ship got stuck in the gulf of sweden, oh, that's it, the world economy rather. well, everything that happened in principle, by and large the united states wants to hit the iraqi proxy armies in a way, uh, so as not to involve iran, and that of course narrows the possibility, so they hit these camps of this

islamic revolutionary guard corps, but it's syria and iran, uh. well, you know, it's like treating uh, oncology by taking aspirin, uh, well , i don't know, it's not even chemotherapy, as you understand, but iran is basically, well, he's unhappy, but he can restore all this, so it's not does not cure the problem, the problem is iran, iran and its ties to russia, china, the same is the case with the red sea, well, the americans don't want it. x hussites, ugh, and it's understandable why, because saudi arabia and the united arab emirates have been trying for 10 years and nothing has worked out, because it's very difficult in a wild country, virtually destroyed, to look for these troops in some desert cities, in an absolutely, i would say demoralized

environment, because the population that chews all the time, that's what it's called. executioner, well, that is, this male population is drugged around the clock, huh, and you have this population to create some kind of power structures so that it will explain to you where the khossites are, it is not as easy as it seems, well at least saudi arabia and the emirates have already made sure of this, and these are much more brutal actions than the united states can afford, you know, then that is connected in the united arab soudsky ara, he will not leave the population on the street. with posters, feel sorry for the yemeni women and children, it won't be like that there, and still nothing happened, so, but again, can this problem be solved, of course it can, of course you can. iran, this is what i said, i have to go back to it, when it was 9/11, i said that if you want to destroy

world terrorism, so that there are no planes that will be in the tower of blasphemers, ee enter if you want , so that there would not be these terrorist acts in subways, on trains, in europe and so on, at the station. so you need to destroy the states that give terrorists the opportunity to train, because somewhere in the limited local situation of a terrorist camp, which is monitored everywhere by the special services of various countries, you you will never prepare a terrorist attack, on airplanes , you need a state or a quasi-state , now the gas sector is such a quasi-state, and then it was afghanistan and... which was also ruled by the taliban from the taliban people, iraq, saddam hussein, libya, maamara gaddafi. when these

regimes arose, there are no major global interactions. you heard about the last global track with the use of, sorry, airplanes, then airplanes and explosives, which can destroy a huge number of people, then they blew up the ato station in madrid, remember. tore off the railway in great britain, we it was already forgotten, now everything is very simple, but no one liked that this is happening, that the united states is interfering somewhere in lebanon, in iraq, libya in libya, libya has become a state in general, this is all terrible, it cannot be done like this anymore , but now no one does this, now they shoot at limited terrorist groups, or at some iranian bases. in syria and iraq, you can even destroy the russian base in syria with several missiles of the united states, russia

will not go anywhere from this, well, this is a great example, and this is what we always say, either we can take these states out of the game, there are two options for the development of events, or we take them out of the game, themselves, not that they are... some kind of show masks in lebanon, in iraq, in syria , and you can also mention the donetsk people's republic, the luhansk people 's republic, transnistria there, now the base of the black sea fleet in abkhazia is a show, well, you can hit abkhazia, it is the same type of independent state, the russian navy will not disappear from this, that's the whole point, that is, either, that means, or you enter into a real conflict with them. with them, or if you're afraid of that, well, i'm sorry , then you negotiate with them, uh, and if you don't do either, the conflict

grows and escalates, and as united states secretary of state anthony blinken rightly says, it metastasizes, it's not to what i propose to negotiate with russia irano, i don't really believe in it at all, but there is simply a simple choice, and the west, like us, by the way, at a certain point... it goes the third way, between these, between these , you know, with two options, wants to pass, as if between drops, not agree, because you cannot agree with terrorist states, but also not to enter into a conflict with them, and to respond to them in such a way as not to make them nervous, that's right, the same thing is happening with iran now as with russia, think about it, we have to strike so that... iran did not enter into a direct conflict, we should help ukraine, supply it with weapons , all that, but in no case, so that there is no idea

that we are in a direct conflict with russia, no, this is the first moment, the second moment, it is so that, in russia there was no major escalation, in russia itself so that there was no war, in iran itself so that there was no military conflict on its territory. i can't, i'm sorry, then president trump appears and says, if you don't want to defeat russia, then i have to come to an agreement with her. this, by the way, is what i am telling you about, that sooner or later it gives rise to such a point of view, so that this path, this path in the middle, to agree somewhere in the middle, it still does not lead to anything, it only leads to to the escalation of conflict, so when i say that there will be more great conflicts of war, as a result of this... will die tens of thousands more people in different regions, and nothing will end, and everyone asks me if i myself believe in such forecasts, of course i don't

believe, believe, i know that it will be so. when i told that there would be a war there in the middle east in 2023, that i believed about it, that i needed to believe it, i just knew it, but the people who lived there in israel did not know that and they did not want and did not believe, because what would it be, well, now they believe, because we usually have faith, it coincides with the event, by the way, the biblical prophets warned about this, yes so to speak, whose blood still flows in us. they said that you need to think before that, there is a city, it can be destroyed, think about what to do so that it does not collapse, they all oh, listen, we have our own business here, and we need to act somehow, so that nothing happens along with it, well, well, here is the answer to the middle east, i don't like it, it's a completely wrong political approach in general, but this is an eternal credo, by the way, president biden had it,

in general, in democracy and in... ... that's how the republicans said we have isolate themselves, the democrats said, we have to support so that american soldiers do not suffer from this, that as a result, who died in an attack by iraqi proxies in iraq, american soldiers, as much as the united states wanted to avoid it, something is not avoided, and you can to say, we will withdraw all the troops from the country, then america will be hit, and then polish airplanes, and then airplanes, that's right, and then high-rise airplanes. you can't avoid it, you can't hide behind the skirt of history like a little child, it's unreal, but on i'm very sorry, i would really like to, and so the question is, in the end, if donald trump is conditional and we agree, yes, because this is one of the natural options that are available in this situation, then should we expect that the level

of terrorism in the world really is. will grow to such an extent that we will once again witness horrific crimes, i don't see a parallel here, i don't know if we can talk about an increase in the terrorist threat, you know, uh, because we 've gone from a conflict with terrorist organizations to a conflict with terrorist states, this is a completely different level of danger, in fact, israel's war with hamas is not a war with a terrorist organization, it is not... it is a war with a terrorist state, it is hamas that managed to turn gas into a state body, and that is why everything turned out so well , a terrorist organization is not capable of the kind of actions that hamas was capable of in gas, and hamas never, until it mastered this state structure, we operate all the time with what things, the ministry of health of the gas sector, another ministry of the sector gas, we never thought that there was a ministry in alkaid, there was some gang there,

here... the state, the politburo, our favorite, as always, as we had when the soviet union existed, various ministries, various officials , visitors who are in other countries and visit these other countries, it is not terrorism anymore, it is a terrorist state, and the soviet union was a terrorist state, and russia is a terrorist state, and iran is a terrorist state, and new ones will be created, maybe new ones, if we will not stop those that exist, and this is the task of the civilized world and... i would very much like you and i to realize this and this would become a plan for the future until now, if i were a candidate for the position of president of the united states, i would go with just such a program, so everyone vote for tailor's america grand again. thank you, this is the end of the saturday political club, my name is khrystyna yatskiv, vitaly portnikov, see you soon.

greetings to the viewers of the tv channel, in the studio of iryna koval, for your attention, the final news release. this week, as ukrainian society and the western press devoted a lot of attention and discussions to him. retirement of the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine, general valery zaluzhny. the washington post published an article stating that the government of ukraine informed the white house that president volodymyr zelensky had decided to fire valery zaluzhny, which would be the most serious reshuffle during the war. and it seems that president zelensky's choice is accepted in the white house.