well, we hold, we hold the front, trench candles , trench candles - you can use them, of course, you won't get very warm there in such a cold, at least you can dry your shoes, you can dry your berse, what if your feet are wet, all this is a minus, hands , your feet should always be warm, you know , everything is like that... some little things, but they are so important, you know, when you sit there with your brother, up to your knees in the swamp, and you sit there , talk, now it would be cool eat snickers, there are such moments that sink in, remain in the memory, multi-purpose swedish archer, one after another.

strikes the rear shelters of the russian army. only 10 seconds pass between shots. the installation works the target so quickly that we barely have time to shoot combat work. the bill is not even for minutes. it decomposes perfectly, in just 30 seconds, we decompose, work out. and just like that , it takes 30 seconds and we leave that place. a feature of the archer is the almost complete automation of the processes of charging, stacking and firing, which is adjusted from the armored cockpit, even one person can perform a combat task, only manual recharging, and the jacking there is also fully automated, and so we work only from the cockpit, charging, sending, adjusting, at least two men, a driver... and a commander or guides,

and so the calculation consists of four people, at the very least, maybe the driver himself , he also has a computer, which is in the gunners, he drives, sees everything, enters it himself, it's just that in terms of time it will not be as fast as the whole crew. archer fires standard nato 155 mm caliber projectiles, range up to 40 km, conventional ammunition up to 60 high-precision. of the escaliber type, in automatic mode a full charge of 21 shots is fired in 2.5 minutes, it can work as a counter-battery gun, as well as against live targets, as well as against armored vehicles, and well , no matter what the target is, in order to effectively destroy the enemy, enemy equipment and enemy force.

fire barrage, fire barrage - a method successfully used by the saw-archer, when several projectiles fly in different trajectories, but hit exactly in one place, it does not allow the infantry to hide in a dugout or a trench after the first break, the first break, there are their own, let's say, dovorotas, which, well, they have to move a little so that the barrel grabs... because it's a computer, it's not like there's a manual , you can't go against the system, it's possible for three projectiles to land at the same time, it's just that the angle of elevation of the barrel will be different, well, there can be a difference of a second, you can also choose several targets, there are 5-10 that he can if the turning radius of the gun allows and so we can work. archer's base, an upgraded

volvo truck with an armored engine and a four-person cabin. the chassis can withstand a mini blast of 6 kg of explosives. even if all the wheels are punctured, sao can move. three bridges, this is a blockade, the moat can pass up to a meter, the flow rate is up to 70 km/h. serhii navidnyk, he says, cleans the sau after every combat operation. a high-precision system requires. care due to shots, let's say so, the drum two was started and it is desirable to clean it so that the table was clean, ugh, so that it worked well for us, ugh, that it is necessary periodically cleaning the ukrainian crew of this archer went through a six-month training program for the sau on an accelerated course, they had to memorize the fire control program to automatism, the entire menu is in english. from

8 a.m. to 9 a.m. we practiced every day without a day off for two months, well, as you can see, the results are about. we are working, everything is fine, huh. the russian army now has a strategic advantage in the war, not having as many shells as last year, it is difficult for zas to restrain the enemy's daily assaults. obviously several months, the ukrainian army will spend in active defense, and much will depend on further military assistance from the west. it. donbas realities, my name is yehor loginov, see you soon.

glory to ukraine, this is the verdict program. my name is serhiy rudenko, i greet everyone and wish everyone good health. for the next two hours, we will talk about ukraine, the world, the war, and our victory. today in... syrsky instead of zaluzhny, the new head of the armed forces plans to improve logistics and introduce new technologies. how will the situation change on the front? putin and carlson. the russian dictator spent two hours explaining to a scandalous american journalist why ukraine should not exist. what conclusions will be drawn in the usa. right to destruction. khimchen according to an older comrade, he promises to attack a neighboring country, which other dictators will the kremlin free. for the next hour, we will talk about this and other things with political scientist ihor reiterovych and two diplomats oleksandr khara and pavel

klimkin. in the second part of our program, which will start in exactly one hour, there will be journalist club: tetyana vysotska, maria gurska and oleksandr golubov, from three european countries. countries from bonn, strasbourg and warsaw will be in touch with our studio, let's talk about how the events in ukraine are perceived in western europe, how they comment on the rotation of the top military leadership of ukraine, of course, how they perceive the interview, a two-hour interview to putin, to the american journalist tucker carson, well, before we start our... big conversation, let's watch a video of how on the occupied shore of the kherson region ukrainian forces dismantled russian molecules with full ammunition, the video was released by the fighters of the 501st separate battalion of marines of the armed forces

of ukraine, let's watch. simultaneously with the telecast, we work on youtube and facebook platforms. for those who are watching live there now, please like this video, subscribe to our youtube and facebook pages, and take our poll. today we ask you about the following: do you understand the reasons for the resignation of the volunteer? yes, no, please vote on youtube, or yes, or no, write your comment below this video if you are watching us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote if you understand the reasons for the sacking of the servant

0800 211 381, no 0800 211 382, ​​all calls to these numbers are free, call at the end programs we... the results of this vote. and we already have our first guest on the phone - this is political scientist ihor reityarovych, head of political and legal programs of the ukrainian center for social development. mr. igor, i congratulate you, thank you for being with us today. good evening. well, since we ask our tv viewers whether they understand the reasons for zaluzhnyi's resignation, i will also ask you if you understand why general zaluzhnyi retired. stake yesterday, and today he was awarded the title of hero of ukraine. i understood the reasons for the resignation of the former commander-in-chief , but look, they are subjective, that is , they are not objective, they are purely political, and it is precisely because of this that we saw such a format, when

on the one hand there is a resignation, very well arranged indeed, everything is properly balanced in the media, today there is an award ceremony, but the aftertaste remains and remains very , you know, bad in the sense that we didn't get adequate explanations, and i 'm afraid we won't get any more. and why, in your opinion, the supreme commander of the armed forces of ukraine? could not articulate why zaluzhny is leaving and why syrskyi is coming, how syrskyi is better than zaluzhnyi, or why zaluzhnyi is worse than zaluzhnyi, and actually what will happen next with zaluzhnyi, he could not articulate it because he has no answer to this question, you understand , when we are talking purely about, for example, the military component, then it is absent in this dismissal, and if you look at all the statements of our military, well , many... who did it that way, you know, yes, well, anonymously, because in principle they cannot express their position very strongly there,

in general, they were in a slight shock in the sense that, despite all the respect for usyrskyi and support for him in the position of commander-in-chief, he does not have any alternative vision of how the situation on the battlefield should develop, that is, by and large, it is a replacement of a person , which was subordinated, well, they appointed a person who was subordinated, but at the same time... it does not fundamentally differ from those approaches, well, to a large extent, at least in a strategic sense, that were adopted by zaluzhny, and accordingly the president could not simply probably, well, to communicate with the citizens, since no matter how he explains the need, for example, the infusion of fresh blood, some new approaches, a new course and so on, all this in one way or another, well, first of all , it was already described in a recent article by zaluzhny, he talked about the necessary changes about what needs to be changed and how to change it, he essentially laid out that plan for 20... the fourth year, well, well, of course, no, no, not very specific, taking into account the state secret and many

other things, but not it was less consistent with the things that the president voiced yesterday, and when we break through the purely military component and talk about the appointment, well , through the prism of some other reasons, or are these reasons purely political, the fact is that the citizens of ukraine, according to everyone polls and what we saw yesterday in the same social networks, well, the reaction, let's say, to this statement, they are absolutely political reasons. they do not accept, they consider them harmful and such that should not take place during war, that is, you know, a very simple answer to this difficult question, if the president had at least one real reason that he could explain in detail and understood that it would be perceived more or less adequately by the citizens there, he probably would have voiced this reason, therefore, since he does not have such a reason, the resignation took place in to the format that we saw yesterday, then some advisors were already added there. more details, but those details seemed, well, very, you know, paled in the background of the event itself, and

again left more questions than answers. after the resignation of zaluzhnyi and the arrival of syrskyi to the post of commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine. volodymyr zelenskyi will now share both the successes and the defeats of the new head of the commissar, because until now we have heard the rhetoric that there is a military leadership, they... plan, they give a bill on mobilization, they ask 500,000 people to mobilize, i.e. this pronoun was always present in the rhetoric of president zelensky, if he brought and dismissed zaluzhnyi and brought syrsky, does it mean that now everything that will happen on the front, everything that will happen in the army, will be . not only with syrsky, including with zelensky? well, in the next few months

it will be like that, and it will be in the maximum format, and well, apparently somewhere in the president's office this risk was taken into account, but they believed that they would be able to block or dilute it directly the position of supreme commander and commander-in-chief, but it will not work out that way for them, and in fact one should sympathize with syrsky, because no matter what he is doing now, as for his professionalism and competence, i don't think there are any comments that he should now... did not do, it will be perceived primarily through the prism of this political appointment, and accordingly in everything they will see the explicit or implicit hand of the president's office, and these are precisely the consequences of the political decision that was made yesterday , and which did not have appropriate explanations, and it will definitely affect the rating of the president, why, because in the near future the situation will remain quite difficult, certain retreats are possible. well, more of this , of course, of a tactical nature, but nevertheless, in certain areas of the front, and

the responsibility for this will primarily be politically borne by the president, because it will be easier for the military to explain what is happening, and it must be understood that unfortunately, we will not have everything necessary for the armed forces in the next month, that is, the situation here is unlikely it will be possible to fix it so quickly, therefore , to receive the consequences and, you know, as the people say, to be raked out, well, only in the political plan for all this. will be directly the president, so i think that the next sociological polls, which sooner or later will lead, well, they will show, most likely, the dynamics of a further drop in the level of trust in the head of state, maybe then the situation will turn around, and god grant that we have success on front, the president will somehow be able to do it right then, well, transfer his own political rating there, but that's a matter of course for at least a few months, and now, unfortunately, there will be such associations, and these associations, well , they will clearly not benefit all the processes that are taking place in our country today, both at the front and directly in power. you mentioned, mr.

igor, actually, that this story will affect the rating of the president... and how will this story affect the rating of valery zaluzhny? look, zaluzhny actually has such an interesting situation today, but it's probably optimal for him. first of all, i want to point out that he is rather than everything will be related to defense in one form or another, even if he will be engaged in what some telegram channels wrote about, for example, teaching, well, it is clear that he will teach military tactics and strategy, and in fact he the colossal experience that our commanders need, nevertheless... i would like to believe that he, at least an adviser, will be an adviser to the same syrsky, or he will be involved in the planning of some operations. this is a completely normal, correct tactic, especially considering the fact that he to date, he is the only commander of this level in ukraine who has the experience of managing all armed forces in general. silsky will only have to learn this to a certain extent, so his experience is needed here. on the other hand, i

think he will not take part in any politics now, simply because the war is going on until the war is over. it is probably not worth talking about any political ambitions of the former commander-in-chief. he may, by the way, pay more attention to some social activity, the more pseudo he had before he became the commander-in-chief, a volunteer, that is, he was already engaged in certain of these issues, perhaps he is now intensifying this direction to some extent, but it will be purely volunteer-public oriented. at the same time, the colossal rating that he has , i think, will not decrease, to some extent, well, in the next couple of weeks, months, it may... even grow, and if in the future he does not do any ambiguous things there steps, this rating could very easily be maintained until the war was over, and then if mr. the worthy person will have the desire, for example, to deal with some political issues, a political career, well, he can then use this rating, i don't know, to create his own political force or for some other things, but this is still a matter of the distant

future, in the near future everything should be fine with him in the future, because after all, they broke up, to put it bluntly, well , it's not bad enough, and he remained in the situation where society is absolutely on his side, and he doesn't even need anything to additionally explain and tell, yes , that is, everyone understands so perfectly why this happened, and that in this situation he bears absolutely no guilt for what happened, so in this context everything should be fine with him, well, the only thing is, look , there is another scenario, i really hope that it will not happen, especially after today's award ceremony. when after some time some stories about some checks there or criminal cases will start spreading there, by the way, we have a criminal case for the uh situation that was in the south of the country on the beginning of the invasion and they say that once even the investigators came to the zaluzhny a long time ago, they asked him something, but if these things do not start to be promoted somehow, well, to cause him some kind of damage, then he can calmly keep this rating for himself, do

some well, the right statements, the right steps, helping the country in defense, and thinking about the future there. but about the future that will be after the war, well, what it can be, this is a completely possible scenario, all the authorities who removed one or another generals, including, i remember, general marchuk was dismissed for forming his own political image, in the wording, in the presidential decree it was written, he was dismissed from the post of prime minister of ukraine, but look, valery zaluzhny never demonstrated his political ambitions, he never articulated what... he wants to become the president of ukraine, he never said that he was a political leader, although to be the commander-in-chief of the armed forces in a country that is waging a war, this is absolutely a political, such a big position, on which the future of ukraine depends, on which depends the life of every person who lives in this country depends on when this war ends,

including, i mean not to belittle the role of everyone who is fighting at the front, but ... the head is a figure so serious, is chance for zaluzhnyi to become the next president of ukraine? yes, of course there is , and you know, i was surprised to read some materials there or articles that started to appear a couple of weeks ago about the fact that bad generals turn out to be politicians and so on, well, people probably don't know very well history, there are many examples when generals became excellent politicians, starting there from and and such, you know, politicians who were respected. there is de gaulle, eisenhower and the same truman, by the way, he was the only one who was not a general, it seems, a lieutenant colonel, but a man with military experience, that is , there are actually a lot of such examples, and if this is the case... valery zaluzhny will have a desire, and he wants after the end of the war, well, to enter, for example, into politics, into politics in general, but to prove himself in the political plane, well

, he will have very good chances, as in in the context of that rating, well, you correctly noted that the figure of the commander-in-chief is a political figure in general, i would also add that the figure of a successful commander-in-chief, that is, a person who really did a lot for the defense of the country, so that ukraine for the first time especially... months of war withstood, here it is simply not, no, let's say , it is impossible to underestimate or overestimate his role there, well, it is objective and it is understood by everyone, and here, well, the question is simply another, with whom he wants to go, or will it be some separate political force, will it be any block, what will be his positioning , what is the general limit of his political ambitions, you understand, because indeed to a certain extent society has just now raised him to the status of a possible presidential candidate, and maybe he looks at it in a different way and sees himself on some there are others. everything can happen in principle, and therefore in this context everything will depend, well, firstly, on when the war will end, and secondly, what exactly will he do now and how

will the authorities monitor such a figure in general, which now to a certain extent has already gone to some, well, partly in such free swimming, it is clear that he is still an active military serviceman, which imposes certain restrictions, but his hands are usually more relaxed, he can give more interviews. what he did very little when he was the commander-in-chief, he can write some programmatic articles, make some speeches, that's clear, it will also affect his image to a certain extent, and also on the support of the citizens, as of today, i emphasize once again, it is colossal, it will remain the same, because today, well, today, yesterday , everything was added, you know, a certain factor of such and such an offense, that how come, a person has done so much, and they treated him, well , to put it mildly, not very well, well, i'm like that. .. very much so, you know, well, he is visible in all those statements that were made, and our citizens actually have a not short memory in this context, they will keep this memory, and the image of zaluzhny is not that he tarnished , he

became even better, well, now his main task is simply to preserve it in the future. well, the question of what and how will happen to oleksandr syrsky, the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine spoke on his telegram channel about the main tasks in his new position, what does he write? new tasks are on the agenda, first of all, this is a clear and detailed planning of actions for all military management bodies, associations, units and units, taking into account the needs of the front in the latest weapons that come from international partners. the fastest rational distribution and delivery of everything necessary for combat units was and remains the main task of military logistics: to know all the needs without exception front and own the situation in each of its areas, the task of the headquarters of all. levels, and the assistant to the head of the pentagon, celeste wallander , says that syrsky is experienced and successful. the united states of america respects and

will work with whoever the democratically elected government and country's leader zelensky chooses as commander-in-chief. we will work effectively with general syrsky, which we already have. mr. igor, one way or another, syrska will be compared to luzhnev. even i look at yesterday's comments, they. were also comparative, because they mentioned that zaluzhnyi graduated from the odesa land academy, and this is the university that already graduated him in independent ukraine, assyrian graduated from the moscow military higher command school and studied under the soviet union, so there are many such comparative characteristics, will oleksandr syrsky still manage to establish himself in the role of commander-in-chief. of the armed forces of ukraine against the background of such a sky-high rating of the people's trust in the brave. well, you really don't envy him. on the one hand, we all, i think,

wish him absolute success, because he is now i will head the armed forces of ukraine, and the entire future of the country and our future depends on the armed forces of ukraine. therefore, in this context, i think that all the support that he needs should be given to him, and society in this regard, well, should give some time there for... so that he enters the state of affairs, understands what should be done and began to implement it. on the other hand, really, the key question is, well, how much he will win or lose in comparison with the lad, but it would be right for him, probably, don't pay attention to it now, but do your job, really demonstrate some new approaches that the president mentioned, and then it will basically work to his advantage, it will work to his advantage that he really has some differences there, and he is ready to implement them. in practice, but the most important thing that he should probably do is somehow show publicly or not publicly that he is responsible for military

decisions. and will not allow any, you know, serious interference by politicians in the direct planning of military operations, by the way, it was mentioned that one of the reasons why zaluzhny was dismissed was that he sent away all the politicians who tried to somehow influence the adoption of purely military decisions, so if he does it, it seems to me that everything should work out for him and he will have support, because the army is a rather specific structure that has subordination, and it is clear that if his... teams and his steps there will be adequate, will correspond to the vision of the armed forces, well, he will use this support, what he said by the way today, it seemed to me a very correct address, there are very clearly placed accents, which contradicts, let's say , with some information that was circulated about him in some media and so on, well, the main thing is that he continued it further and, well, maybe collected some let him have a small press conference, where he would clearly say what he is going to focus on, how he will implement it,

further on... time will tell, i think that he will have support, well, at least at the first stage, in that number from zaluzhnyi, if it is to him will turn thank you, mr. igor, for the conversation, it was igor reiterovych, political scientist and head of political and legal programs of the ukrainian center for social development. friends, we work live on the tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms. for those who are currently watching us live, there. please like this video, don't be stingy so that it... well, vote in our poll, today we ask you about whether you understand the reasons for the resignation of the hard worker, yes, no, please vote in on youtube or with the yes or no button, write your comment, what do you think about it under this video, and if you watch us on tv, pick up your smartphones or phones and vote if you understand the reasons for the resignation of the hard worker 0800 211 381 no

0800 211 300 72, all calls to these numbers are free, vote, we will be happy to receive your votes and show the tv viewers a rating of how you trust, do not trust the industrious industrious, whether you understand why he resigned or not, more we have communications oleksandr khara, foreign and security policy expert of the center for defense strategies, diplomat, mr. oleksandr, i congratulate you, thank you for being with us today, good evening, sir. and thanks for the invitation. the release of general zaluzhny marks a new and decisive stage in the war, in which zelonsky risks making a mistake, writes zekonmist. i will quote what the british publication writes. the most important question is whether mr. zelensky will be able to use zaluzhny's resignation to reorient his vision of the war. today he still publicly promises that ukraine

will return every centimeter of occupied land. by russian forces, even realizing that it will not happen soon, if at all , if ukrainian forces could drive out the russian occupiers, it would be great, however, unless something completely unexpected happens, a territorial war is a war that ukraine cannot win , so think the journalists for the economist. mr. oleksandr, please tell me how zaluzhny's resignation is perceived in the west now, and how you personally perceive it... that is, is this a mistake, a staffing mistake by zelenskyi, or is it not a staffing mistake, or is it a decision of the supreme commander, which fits within the framework of the existing legislation and the constitution, and it is up to him to decide who is actually in the position of the head of the armed forces of ukraine? well, first of all, i will probably start with the statement of john kirba, the speaker of the national security council of the united states, he said that the president

of ukraine can of course. make such reshuffles, and of course the united states will work with any military leader, who will be appointed, and it is clear that our partners, our closest friends, they will perceive this person with respect, especially since he has a certain record, and he will not come out of nowhere, that is, an experienced person, here, but actually, if you look, well, i looked at the british and american press, then there... they wonder what was the real reason for what happened, well, of course, everyone lists such guesses, starting with some political mischief, that the administration zelenskyi, or actually zelenskyi himself, saw it as a good thing a political competitor, and actually this is one of the reasons, which is actually mentioned in all sources, well, there are other reasons,

for example, the fact that the... but cautious was diligent, p