during these weeks, it lost a million export potential, a million tons of oil products that it could export and earn currency, now it will not export them, and the further ukrainian troops will destroy, so to speak, not only its large landing ships, but also the crimean bridge , the softer and more ready for negotiations the russian dwarfs will be. mr. volodymyr, another topic that... unfolds right before our eyes, lukashenko is again talking about the threat from ukraine, he has not been heard for a long time, and he did not articulate what is happening in ukraine there are forces that want to detonate or blow up something in belarus, here he again said that there was a threat and that it seemed to be about some saboteurs and a counterterrorist operation was being carried out on the border, let's listen to what lukashenko said.

just today, several saboteurs were detained on the border with ukraine, with the help of drones in the swamps, some of the ukrainian citizens crawled over to our side, threw explosives to commit sabotage, primarily on the territory of russia and belarus. a counterterrorist operation that you have just completed didn't even notice, and well, it's none of your business, you should work quietly, do your job. just. the chekisko military operation has ended, all the saboteurs have been arrested, and belarus is among them, and this is practically two or three times a week, can we calm down? no, we can't. that is, lukashenko is a classmate of putin's war in ukraine, and he constantly carries a blizzard about what kind of saboteurs there are, even though he is participating in this operation. military operations,

military operations in the war against ukraine, and is surprised that someone is crossing the border there and someone is trying to blow something up, but in principle he could say, it's good that so far nothing has been blown up there, well, in general, this speech by lukashenka is such an additional appearance with guilt, please pay attention to what he is talking about russia in the first place, the leader of the country. belarus , they will commit these terrorist attacks against russia in belarus, he uses russia in the first place, that is, it means that, well, this is a freudian trick, he has, he is not guided by the national interests of belarus, he is a russian gaulleiter on the territory of belarus, and this pretext emphasized especially clearly, the funniest thing is that... that his lies, she,

she, just as well as russian propaganda, because to imagine, now with such weather, with rains, with a huge flood, on the territory of belarus , i want to say that a flood has started, the water level has risen, i can imagine saboteurs crawling on their bellies from the territory of ukraine through pripyat to the territory of belarus, well, out of... common sense, from what common sense would such a thing be carried this caricature type, by the way, in the state border service of ukraine stated that the dictator lukashenko continues to play along with russia with the aim, including to shift the emphasis and expose ukraine as the aggressor, but his statements have no real basis, this was stated by the state border service of ukraine, well, we will monitor what lukashenko says and how he says . because this is also part of the hybrid

information war waged against us by the russian federation, through lukashenka and through belarusian leaders, other belarusian leaders, let's talk with you, mr. volodymyr, about trust ratings, because this another trust rating was published last week, where 94% of ukrainians trust the hard worker, the general's trust rating increased from 92 to... 94%, the second place is occupied by general budanov, where the general's rating increased accordingly, compared to december from 60 to 66%, and third the place is held, or occupied, or rather volodymyr zelenskyi 77% in december, 64% in february, well, general syrskyi also goes there. and he suddenly also

entered the top five of those whom ukrainians trust, but i looked at it from five positions, three positions are occupied by generals in this one. trust rating, this does it mean that ukrainian society trusts during the war, or would ukrainian society like to continue to have this trust in the military in the future, that is, after our victory, when we will restore and rebuild the country? well, first of all , there is a people's army in ukraine, which means that ukrainians trust the army a lot. this is such an original love for the military and respect for the army as an institution, for the military, it has always been preserved, but during the war , the military turned out to be the most effective managers, and in this sense, trust is based precisely on the effectiveness of the military's actions, despite the fact that we see

objective processes of trust in zelensky falling, at the same time, ukrainians also recognize that the country. in the wrong direction, i have the impression that the field on this survey was completed even before the resignation of general zaluzhnyi, because i think that if the field on this survey was completed literally a day or two ago, when the consequences of the resignation of general zaluzhnyi were already taken into account, then i think that confidence in general zaluzhnyi would probably reach 98%. she is to be honest, this is turkmen, but it means that the military turned out to be the most effective managers during the war, people do not trust civilian politicians, or rather politicians as such, people trust the military, because the military are people who

say little and act very responsibly , we , we see it, by the way, another interesting point is that with the arrival of general syrsky... well, the mistakes of the political authorities that were made regarding contacts with western partners, regarding the supply of weapons, and the persecution of serhii suddenly began to emerge pashinsky, who, well, is the president of the association of manufacturers of ukrainian weapons, enterprises of the military-industrial complex, and here is some strange story, when the political leaders... constantly create an atmosphere of nervousness and insecurity for the society, on the other hand, the military demonstrates a very consistent and politics, consistent actions, and probably society , society still likes the most

that the military are few in words, they are, well, very modest in words, but very honest in actions. and people really like it, well, me, honestly speaking, the fate of all generals who are in the trust rating is worrying, there, by the way, general budanov, well, as a matter of fact, many questions arise about possible political jealousy or possible political prospects of these generals, you, yes, mr. serhiy, here a really comical story, because, for example, the other day they did not let petro poroshenko go to... the security forum in munich, and in the fact that the chairman of the verkhovna rada stefanchuk, well, did not allow petro poroshenko to leave, it was general budanov who appeared, who informed, allegedly informed the chairman of the verkhovna rada advice on what

petro poroshenko is in some kind of danger in munich, well, this is an absolutely comical story, only general budanov lit up with an effective blow... after the destruction of the large amphibious assault ship caesar kunik, just as the politicians immediately caught him in an absolutely wild and comical story, but very humiliating for countries. i am actually asking about these generals because you believe that the generals will enter ukrainian politics, because they are people who are used to living in the army and leading the army . because they work their whole life authority and on their ranks and on what they do, how likely is it that the same 16 generals who were dismissed by zelenskyi and released, or rather, changes in the military leadership of ukraine, that they can become

part of a large political project led by the diligent and well, there will be a conditional party, well, in general , they start to engage in military policy when they have nothing else to do, or they retire, because the military is always an instrument of the state, that is, they are part of the state and they are so... executive , executive vertical of the state, as a rule, this accustoms them to the initiative to manage the front, to manage the troops, but politics is still a political initiative, and just this, well, primitive service in a rigid vertical, executive, in rigid subordination, accustoms the military very often to be afraid of any what kind of initiative, that is, this is the first... second, our military for the last, well, since about the 14th year, especially when

intensive relations with nato appeared after the 17th year, there are some communication problems, yes, when they appeared after the 17th year intense relations with nato, our military very quickly got over ethics, with politics, specifically nato, we see that even in difficult situations that are happening now, the front, lack of this, problems with mobilization, the military avoids, well, the generals avoid any - any political assessments, and this is a very, very important signal that they still live by nato standards. they will show their political initiative when there are circumstances for

politics, as long as the war lasts, they avoid any political maneuvers, that is, we not so soon, we will have a hard-working politician, if many of our viewers would like it, a hard-working politician can only appear quickly in circumstances where many different groups of influence... rushed into the need to find that figure who integrates many different environments, so at one time, i will remind you, very briefly, if possible, 10, 10 seconds in 2002 viktor yushchenko integrated various political forces in our country. thank you, mr. volodymyr, it was volodymyr tsybulko, a political expert. friends, we work live on the tv channel, as well as on ours platforms on youtube and facebook. we spend polls on facebook and youtube, as well as on tv, and we ask you

about this, would you like to see a professional military man at the head of ukraine, now let's look at the interim results of the poll on tv, 91% yes, 9% against, next we have there will be a journalist club with the participation of olga leni, oleksiy mustafien and nataliya ishchenko, i congratulate you, this is svoboda live on radio svoboda, we have already come to the most snake-like, the following shots may shock you. news from the scene live, kamikaze drone attacks, political analytics objectively and meaningfully, there is no political season, exclusive interviews, reports from the hottest points of the front. the freedom of light, frankly and impartially, you draw your own conclusions. greetings

friends, the second part of the verdict program is on the air of the espresso tv channel, my name is serhiy rudenko, today it is released. unexpected death in prison. oleksiy navalny died in a colony beyond the arctic circle. has the russian opposition lost hope? generals are at the top of the ratings. dismissal of the servant. undermined confidence in zelenskyi. prospects of the military in politics domestic political front. the authorities put pressure on the opposition, business and journalists. how to avoid internal conflicts during war? friends, during the program we conduct surveys. we ask you about this, whether you would like to see a professional military man at the head of ukraine. yes no. everything is quite simple on youtube. if you have your own opinion, please write in a comment. under this video, if you watch us on tv, then vote for the corresponding numbers,

if you see a professional military at the head of ukraine 0800-211-381, no 0800-211-382, call all calls to these numbers are free, at the end of the program we will tally up the results of this vote, and i want to introduce the guests of today's studio, they are my colleagues, journalists, the best journalists of ukraine, olga len, political... viewer, host of the espresso tv channel , author of the chronicles of information war program. greetings, good evening. natalia ishchenko, journalist, project manager. balkan columnist. mrs. natalie, i congratulate you. thank you for being with us today. good evening. oleksiy mustafin, journalist, historian, publicist, media manager. mr. oleksiy, i congratulate you and thank you for joining the broadcast. so, therefore, the whole world and all world media are discussing today the murder of navalny in the russian

colony, joe biden literally an hour ago, made a corresponding statement and said that... putin is responsible for the death of navalny and called for help to ukraine. let's hear what joe biden said. this tragedy reminds us of what is at stake. we need to continue funding ukraine so that ukraine can defend itself against terrible aggression putin, from his crimes. " history is following us, and it is unforgivable to stop providing aid to ukraine in this situation, time is running out, the clock is ticking, we all have to understand that we are dealing with putin." there were a lot of comments today by world leaders and leaders of the countries that gathered today in

munich at the security conference, and somehow the topic of ukraine was in the speeches. of many presidents of countries who commented on navalny's murder were not as clear as biden's speech, which said that the clock is ticking and ukraine must be helped. olga, because of this murder navalny, will the world react differently and provide more aid to ukraine, realizing that now the future of the world is decided not by the russian opposition, but by the armed forces in the region. ivka, etc. in other areas of the russian-ukrainian front? well , of course, i would like to think that this will destroy at least this myth that has been in my head for quite a long time, that russia is some kind of country where you can change the government by non-violent means, you see, they plant

their opposition, but oh well khodarkovsky was released, so navalny will be released, or there will still be some hope. or if someone else, and they will come and vote for him, and thus the government will change. in fact, navalny's death in prison shows that this path does not exist in russia. that is, any change in the regime in russia is possible only by the fact that russia simply loses the war, it loses in its foreign policy these ambitions, then yes, it can cause some changes inside russia and... no, it is absolutely impossible, it does not exist no russian position, there are no leaders who can to change something there, these are all myths, just such myths, this is not a country in which such changes are happening, this is a country that has long been based on such a principle, like north korea, maybe like china, you have also heard that there is someone there they put him down and everyone watched him

sit, and then he came out, and someone said , oh, maybe this will change something, no, no one there thinks like that, there... everyone understands that there can be changes only or by , well, such, you know, a palace coup, well, or by some other means, well, when some big such perversions take place in the world, well, in russia has the same story, moreover, it must be said that in general, even this kind of russian people, er, reacted more to what was happening around prigozhin, his rebellion, his death, his murder there, than to what is happening around navalny, that is, this is also an indicator, that is, there will either be a palace coup, or russia will lose in some, well actually in a war, and this will also push something, there are no other options, will it be understood in the world, well it is very scary, according to many understand, because it simply changes this whole concept, you know, this is a controlled

escalation of some possible agreements with putin, all this is not... thank you, olga, natalia, actually before the meeting took place, or rather after the meeting took place in geneva biden and putin, the president of the united states of america, when asked by a journalist what will happen if navalny dies in prison, he said, these will be simply unprecedented consequences for russia, well, we are already seeing these unprecedented consequences. putin started a large-scale war against ukraine, we already see these sanctions that are being introduced by the united states of america, the world, and europe, today putin... simply demonstrates such impunity, simply incredible, when the whole world understands that for him it is for a person, or for a creature, for this one

, which is killing tens of thousands of people in ukraine, killing some oppositionist there, torturing him somewhere over the arctic circle, it is not a problem at all, or do you think that the world's focus is shifting to what putin is doing? and does the world realize the threat, the colossal threat, that putin poses, for whom in general, human life is not worth anything at all , you know, i agree with olya that it is very scary to admit this fact, and it is obvious that the west, well , the whole world, but mainly the west was very afraid to admit it, because you know that navalny.. . already tried to poison, and there was no such unequivocal sharp reaction of the west, there was condemnation, of course, but

there was no such thing as a general change in the attitude towards the russian authorities, but now what happened with navalny still seems to me , then historians will perceive, will evaluate as turning point. moment, why? because after all, illusions about some changes , that russia will take a different path, it just takes time, it takes effort, it is necessary to support the russian position more, including abroad, to develop some alternative democratic, political forces, such an illusion was, she turned out to be very resilient, and it seems to me that this case... with navalny will still change and not only, you know, in the west, i don’t think that the west will be able to turn around like that sharply, i think that the attitude

to the situation will change in the russian opposition itself, and i i think that the russian opposition is one of the main, in fact, such spectators , according to those people who... nevertheless tortured navalny in prison, i will explain, because i perceive what happened to navalny, his death, as intimidation in first of all, russian oppositionists, as a signal that you will not succeed in anything, stop, and i think that the vast majority of good russians, as they are called, they will really get scared and stop. that their, even that light struggle, which they conducted mainly abroad, they will cease to exist

activists, they will understand that this is already a signal directly for them, and they will continue to be more afraid and speak less. the west, i think, will draw radical conclusions with great delay, and i think that just... for the west, the main conclusion, which would be correct, after all, in the confrontation between russia and ukraine, is not to hope that something will happen to russia, and it would stop being aggressive, well, an aggressive country that tries to capture its neighbors, yes, after all, it is a war of russia against ukraine, and it is necessary to help ukraine, so that something like that... changed in russia. i think there will be such a conclusion, but not now. i think that the first step will be the weakening of the russian position, and then

the west will have an insight. oleksii, oleksii , what, this information about navalny appeared on the first day of the munich security conference, well, it could appear tomorrow, for example, after all, the russian federation fully controls its colonies, there could be prisons there. .. to make the information public tomorrow, for example, before the speech of volodymyr zelenskyi, to interrupt what will happen say zelensky during the security conference, what they did today, and this information appeared today on the opening day of this conference, is this a bold challenge of putin in this world community, where he once again says that he wanted to wait for everyone , if he is not allowed anywhere outside the borders of russia, then in this way he demonstrates his audacity. not force, i would say audacity, i would not say that it was done specifically for the munich conference, i think that putin does not care

there, what from... happens at the event , the conference, especially, well, what's up, it's not a meeting of the big seven and not ramstein, after all, so i don't think that it was tied, well, as in a joke, who it is necessary, that was killed, today, tomorrow is of no importance, as far as your previous questions are concerned, the most important and the best, the most effective reaction to the killed is actually the most important. navalny is a murder, and in this sense i would support zelensky’s speech today, that is, this comment was, but it is, in my opinion, one of the clearest definitions dav, this is murder, and the best reaction of the west would be to understand that putin is a danger that must be eliminated, and eliminated directly, not even through ukraine, but

directly. the entry of the west into the fight against putin, this can be done secretly, but nevertheless it must be done, because this person is unpredictable, tomorrow he can use nuclear weapons, and so on, that is, he must simply be eliminated, preferably also from the environment, but in my there is great doubt that the west will act in this way, it is not at all in the habits of the west. let me remind you that even when there was a war with hitler, in which at least two great powers, france and britain, participated , they defeated france, britain remained, but the united states never entered the war, they waited for hitler to declare war on them, they entered only then, so i don’t think that the reaction of the west will be exactly the same, but the minimum program is definitely support

for ukraine and the fact that biden will connect the events in russia, i.e. the murder of navalny, with the fact that ukraine should be given assistance, this is basically, from my point of view, positive signal, it would be good if our other allies or partners formulated it in the same way clearly. by the way, i was impressed by the fact that this and one of the... russian oppositionists, namely gari kaspar, commented that the only answer, the main answer should be the support of ukraine in the war against aggression, the aggression of russia . today, the secretary of state of the united states of america, anthony blinken, said that russia is responsible for the death of navalny, if the report is true, let's hear what blinken said.

for more than 10 years, putin's russian government persecuted alexei navalny, poisoned and imprisoned him, and now announces his death. first of all, if these reports are true, our condolences go out to his wife and his family. in addition, his death in a russian prison, fixation and fear of one man, only highlights the weakness and rottenness at the core of the system that putin has built. russia is responsible for this. we will be talking to many others.

regarding putin, because until now they did not have a single vision, and what to do with russia, the question is what putin still has to do in order to reach these conclusions, i am not sure that such conclusions will be reached, well , you see that even blinkin, who in principle takes a fairly clear position, he says, what if it will be confirmed, it will be confirmed, this damn uncertainty, you know, well, well, yes, yes, yes, to bathe or not to bathe, well, yes, yes, olya, everything, well, everything. can our current western partners take such radical steps, considering the fact that they do not even have a single vision, and what i am doing is this first of all, i don't think that this is what we're talking about at all, we're talking about, and i think that oleksiy meant it most likely simply to strengthen the military component, i've already said that it's

actually this... a blow to the very concepts.