[000:00:00;00] it was these guys who took the military-civilian administration into their faberge and began to close the issue of the construction of defensive lines, to zaporizhzhia, of course, further than to kramatorsk, there are as many as 47 or 50 km from the front line, idiots, what else can i say , well, i won’t say it in another way, high treason, maybe the sbu, counterintelligence should be involved, what is this sabotage going on, and maybe it’s not sabotage, but maybe it’s high treason, we have to figure it out, but what am i, i i can't do everything for the baby, eh, further along the front. well, what else is so interesting? chasiv yar for them fundamental, in order to complete the issue of the donetsk agglomeration, as they say, and to have the opportunity to look either at konstantinivka to the left, or at sloviansk-kramatorsk to the right, well, this issue must be considered, well, i think that the general staff will figure it out here. movement, the front has moved near vogledar, well , i think this is connected with the fact that it is not far from avdiyivka, maybe some groups from the avdiivka direction are starting to suppress

ugledar. they will look in the direction of pokrovsk, but pokrovsk is still far away, but nevertheless they will look in that direction look, maybe they will just look in the direction of the konstantinivka-pokrovsk highway , maybe i am now, you know, we can run with you on the map here as you want, but operational information about the reserves and concentration of the enemy is usually in the main intelligence office and in our general headquarters, that's why i think that they can better see the directions that are very threatening today, well, that's how i see it, and yes, before putin's election, they will try those two... the last ones in the luhansk region after all press on us, well, we will see, today nato secretary general jen stoltenberg said that ukraine will have the right to strike russian military targets outside of ukraine with f-16s. there is so much talk about the transfer of the f-16 and probably they should already be in ukraine and these planes should be used in ukraine. and it must be said that these are not the first planes, they are planes of the first generation,

not the last generation. er, what will fundamentally change when the f-16s appear in ukraine? well, let's be honest. i don't know what means of defeat we used now, but look, once we got the weapon and were able to use it closer to the front line, we actually started landing russian russian planes. it's super, super. f-16s have greater opportunities to destroy enemy aircraft and have slightly longer ranges. well, from what we are today. we can, as they say , use it, but we can’t push the patriot under the very front line in order to get a russian plane that throws a kab 70 km away, well , relatively speaking, so you’ll see, i’m sorry, i told the truth, that’s why the f16 will of course have quite serious challenges, and having certain weapons, of course they will have opportunities, now stoltenberg's statement, this is a very good statement, we are not relaxing, but let's be honest, we can

shoot down forever... and look for patriots to counter russian missiles , but i think that it is still necessary to destroy the launchers, and how can we get the launchers, can the f-16 help us with this, yes, they can help to a certain extent, but i think that they can not help us in this only f-16, and other weapons that we partners should give. by the way, the vote in the bundestag today was very significant, i also want to draw attention to it, because today, while the americans... they make declarative statements and say how bad putin is, we still receive the support of western partners, and germany bears, so to speak, one of the main burdens of this support, the vote in the bundestag today actually put scholz on the ropes, because they called on scholz to allocate long-range missiles to ukraine, the word taurus was not used there, but we understand that this is taurus, let's say, further on in this vote and the speeches of the bundestag there were still

very... serious symbolic statements, well, first of all, they no longer say that the war has only been for two years, but they say that putin has already been in power for 10 years, as is waging an aggressive war against ukraine, so the question is, how many years has the war stopped for the germans, 10 years, they admitted their foreign policy mistake, that they considered russia an element of european security, and not an element of threat to this security, they actually recognized angela's policy merkel, who was mistaken, is so... diplomatic saying, in general, it was real trash, nevertheless, the germans know how to admit their mistakes, and such statements were made today, that is why i pay so much attention to these news from western partners, because it is very important for us, against this background, we see such victorious reports of the green team and president zelensky about the signing of many, many security agreements with many countries, and here lapin sits like this and says: well , it wouldn’t be lapin if he hadn’t been remembered for it,

but... exactly: what is this for security agreements? well , this was very well expressed today representatives of italy said that it is nothing, it is not called anything, it is an agreement about intentions, but no financial and economic obligations. whether they do not carry a military character, well, i did not quote this now, i said so, my own test for my understanding of the data. i would like to add that any security agreement that has not been ratified, including by the parliaments of these countries, is a fickle document, but zelenskyi and his team are trying to pass it off as some kind of great victory, probably against the background of the fact that they will announce the thesis soon , that no one will invite ukraine to nato at this, at this future summit, but, but, in order to say that... we signed security agreements and now we are ready to sit down at the negotiating table with russia, perhaps such an element will be used, well, i think, on the 25th, at the press conference of the country's military and political leadership, we will hear fake agreements, so to speak

, and we will hear why all this was signed. one of the signatories of the security agreement, such as france, blocked the allocation of funds for procurement to ukraine, for ukraine's 800,000 projectiles were found by the president of the czech republic, well, i am now saying that the czech republic found, well, the president of the czech republic peter pavel announced it, it is more like 2 billion euros, thank god, today canada announced that they are ready to pay this delivery, or delivery or shells, i have not yet understood, because the translation gives information in different ways, but i think that experts of this diplomatic language will decipher it in the context, after all, that canada is ready to pay for it, so france is a signatory of security agreements , such turnover... for blocked aid to ukraine, which is bleeding, along with greece and cyprus. well, this is the international story. thank you, mr. major. let's move on to domestic politics, because today it became known that zelenskyi introduced

a draft law on the demobilization of conscripts to the verkhovna rada, and he marked this bill as urgent, and it proposes to release conscripts to the reserve during martial law after the end of their military service. a real decree of the president, frankly speaking, i do not understand why this dance is taking so long around such bills, well , the same laws should be adopted much faster, and without any markings there , well, during the war, such things are done much faster, since the law, by the way, about mobilization, because 4,000 amendments have been submitted, and i can imagine , that zelensky does not take responsibility for this, well... political responsibility, he says: well, the military leadership there prepared together with shmygal, if both that law and that law for zelenskyi came and presented it in the verkhovna rada of ukraine, then obviously would his them would it was adopted in the first , second, and third readings, and in general there during

a certain period, well, for a week there , they shortened this entire procedure, why is it not happening, why is everything being dragged out, the urgency of this draft law is shown, although, well, it is already it's overdue... the urgency, no, mr. serhiy, i will correct you a little, this draft law, it is not necessary at all, we have conscripts already demobilized at the end of the decree, i cannot understand the essence of this law at all, that it still needs to be introduced to the parliament, yes pathos about demobilization, and conscripts were demobilized after the end of their service, not only that, as far as my memory serves, i'm afraid to make a mistake in the numbers, but after demobilization there is a certain period of time. they could not be mobilized into the armed forces of ukraine, well, on the basis of the law on martial law, the fact that this mobilization is taking place now, that is, conscripts in our country did not go to war anyway, well, unless at will, according to a report or according to a contract, there these are different

stories, but i emphasize once again what kind of law it is about demobilization, in our country conscripts were always demobilized at the end of their term of service, during the war, during martial law, mr. major, those people who left... were mobilized until before the great war, before the invasion, but they remained despite that's all, no, they were also demobilized before, we are talking now about conscripts, conscripts, these are those who were called up before the age of 27, those who simply served in the army, they were in telev units, they were not involved in military operations, no, in the beginning wars were involved, well, there was moss and swamp there, i can’t say that no one was involved, cadets were also involved in us during a full-scale invasion, when a big boom had already begun, when there was already a threat of losing kyiv altogether, and so on. but in general, from a legal point of view, conscripts in our

country were and were subject to demobilization at the end of their term of service, i can’t understand, i haven’t seen that law, but i can’t understand, even based on these tests, which are already known in general , that is, what i have already read, then i do not i can understand logic in general. so much pathos about, i understand that there is a very good word there, demobilization, it could be written in capital letters, and then in small letters those who were supposed to be... mobilized, well, let's call them conscripts, well, something like that, friends, look at the law on mobilization during martial law, the one to whom everything that we are now at war is completely different, it is a big, big process that is regulated in our legislation, but in the realities of today's hostilities, some points need to be corrected, and the verkhovna rada has not been able to correct it in any way for two years, because it is necessary to prescribe unpopular things. but you know what i'm paying attention to, you remember history recently, the military wants

to mobilize half a million, well, somewhere different publics said that, well, they don't want a military one, the state needs to increase its armed forces by half a million, the state needs to increase its forces for the survival of nations not the military want, but zelensky shifted this responsibility to the unpopular such a request from the military, but i am against it, because they do not they argued, who argued that the front is getting exhausted, that it is necessary to put things in order, that it is necessary to deal with... the powers of the tsk, so for this we need a cabinet resolution, that the tskashnyk should have such and such papers with him and have access to wherever he needs to go, without the police, and in case of resistance, he has the right to use forceful measures of influence, we have martial law , stop playing with this, you know, ala, pseudo-democracy, we have martial law, the military should rule the country at the moment, but none the less , well, we've already decided to regulate by law. ok, they did not want to take responsibility, mr. president

, of course, he removed himself, it is unpopular, he is now, you understand, that he is preparing for the elections, not that he is not going to be the father of the nation, he is going for one more term, that is why unpopular statesmen he does not want to start making decisions, then he continues to deal with ratings, well, okay, everything is chosen, eat, we have it, today the law on mobilization provides for 400 edits, well, this is trash, everyone will do pr, well, for example, it will happen, someone will say: i want dembel after 18 months, i think that yulia tymoshenko will say, no, no, this is unfair, let's go after 12 months, and some have already served 24, because this law should apply from the moment of mobilization, from the moment a person was called up, and not from the moment of signing a great leader, because logically it should be written that way, and they wrote it that way in this first reading, and they said exactly that, that from the moment when a person was mobilized, therefore... who came in the 22nd year i have already served two terms,

it turns out according to some theses, there are a lot of them edits, i think that it is not even one program, it may end up being ours and yours , because there is not enough time to discuss everything, but the main thing, as i see it, is that a scale should be established for fair demobilization, because a year in avdiivka is not even not three years in chernivtsi. or in frankivsk, you understand , that’s why one to 3x is on the front line, well, as we have already settled this story with the payment of bonuses, there are 100,000 bonuses at zero, there are close to zero 30,000 bonuses, in chernivtsi there is no bonus, that’s how it should be, one to two one to three and one to one, and then you can say demobilization in 36 months, but for those who are in the trenches it is... in 12 months, for those who are further from the trenches,

in 24, well, for those who far, yes, then it will be fair, social justice and justice in the armed forces, but the fact is that the green team managed to quarrel with the military, against civilians, to quarrel with their poor politics, well , because you look at what they are doing with the representatives of the tsk in odesa is already being beaten there, somewhere there roma were beaten in chernivtsi or somewhere else, well, we see, that is, they managed to digest during the war. military with civilians , in addition to contrasting some military, those on the front lines, with other military , those in the tsk, for example, and digesting six of these among themselves, here are the results of the geniuses of communication, gathered, now we are not tainted by them, thank you, thank you , mr. major, let's talk after the law is adopted, the most important thing is when it is signed, because i think the main intrigue will be whether president zelensky will sign this law, because he can also say, i like this law doesn't suit, let's... vote again with amendments, re-vote, i didn't write it,

he will say, the military wrote it, shmygal's government wrote it, so i'm sorry, work on the draft law. thank you, mr. major, for the conversation, it was ihor lapin, a major of the armed forces of ukraine, a special officer, a people's deputy of ukraine of the eighth convocation. friends, we are working live and on our platforms in youtube and facebook, today we ask you about this, do you believe that the war will end with the return of all territories, yes. no, everything is quite simple on youtube if you are sitting down in front of the tv and with a smartphone in hand, vote if you believe that the war will end with the return of all territories (0800-211-381). no 0800 211 382 all calls to these numbers are free, call, at the end of the program we will sum up the results of this vote. next , volodymyr omeliyan, former minister of infrastructure of ukraine, serviceman of the armed forces of ukraine, will be on our air. mr. volodymyr, i congratulate you, thank you for joining our broadcast. good evening, sergey, thank you for

the invitation, i'm glad to see you, you know that, of course, you both know, this is what is happening in poland. and on the ukrainian-polish border, this is precisely a question for both the former minister of infrastructure and the current serviceman of the armed forces, because in this situation we are talking about infrastructure, but also about infrastructure during the war. yesterday, volodymyr zelenskyi invited the poles to meet at the ukrainian-polish border and discuss all the issues that arise in response to zelenskyi's proposal to hold a meeting of the two governments with... also representatives of the european commission donald tusk proposed holding such a meeting as early as march 28 in warsaw, let's hear what tusk said. the ukrainian side also understands that it is better to conduct these negotiations at the technical level so that the government meeting has a non-symbolic

value, because we do not need symbolism in relations. the whole world sees how determined we are to help ukraine, and there is no need for more. bright gestures of solidarity. i would like us to separate these two issues in the domestic and international discussion. first, it is an undoubted help ukraine in its resistance to russian armed aggression. this is not subject to discussion. the second question is how to protect polish farmers and the polish market from the negative consequences of trade liberalization, that is, the opening of the border for trade in agricultural products. this is what hurts us the most. mr. volodymyr, obviously the current conflict between ukraine and poland is one of the biggest in the modern history of ukraine with the poles. well, i remember, there were still conflicts with the russians, but there the initiators of these conflicts were always the russians, who led trade wars with ukrainians. what

is happening now is the economy, politics or the influence of other states on certain groups of people who are blocking the ukrainian border. well, there are several. factors or strata, so the first factor is that tusk relies on a coalition, he does not have a monopoly in poland, poland, which for a long time was under the leadership of pis for eight years, needs a serious transformation, this is a mega task for tusk, especially considering that this year's local elections. the second story is that, of course, polish business and the polish elite are evaluated ukraine's entry into... the european union and nato is positive, but they have certain reservations, because then ukraine itself will become the main contributor to european funds and transatlantic funds. in the horizon of 20 years - this is a serious story for polish business, how to compete with ukrainian. unfortunately, the ukrainian authorities

have not yet offered an alternative, synergy, cooperation and interaction so that we can jointly enter foreign markets and jointly solve our economic, political, and security problems. question and the third factor is definitely certain you know, this is the coldness about the relations between the leaders of the two states, poland and ukraine. this cold has not yet been overcome. apparently, it seems to me that president zelensky still needs to have a confidential conversation with the prime minister of poland tusk, in order to clarify all the issues of the past, there were several impressive moments, and what we will do in the future. formula yesterday evening stadium so the stadium at the level of interstate relations did not work. tusk gently but firmly rejected this proposal, and clearly stated that we have a format for negotiations, we are waiting for ukrainian proposals, they should be worked out at the technical level and until we meet at the political level at the end

of march this year, at best, so i would very much like the ukrainian side to take these signals seriously, because we have ... daily damage from this situation, which is happening on the polish-ukrainian border. we cannot afford the luxury of ignoring poland or treating it as an outsider. poland played a key role for ukraine next to the united states on the beginning of the great war in the 22nd year. poland accepted millions of ukrainian refugees and asked for help. and poland is a member of the european union and nato. it is extremely important for us that poland does not just vote for our membership. but she was an active, good lobbyist on ukraine's path to euro-atlantic structures, because , unfortunately, there is no shortage of ukrainian skeptics, and that's all... western countries, we cannot afford to have poland among them. mr. volodymyr, was it possible to avoid this

big conflict, because well, when start to scatter ukrainian grain from trucks and wagons that go to germany in transit through poland, well , of course, this is quite a serious blow to the past. ukrainians survived the holodomor, and it looks like blasphemy that our neighbors, the poles, are doing this with ukrainian grain, and it is clear that in the conditions when we have one western border, through which a lot of eu products pass, not civilian, but military products, it looks so that the poles are trying in some way to harm, prevent this and do everything to this the product did not arrive here. how in this situation, have the ukrainian, ukrainian authorities, foreign policy

authorities made enough efforts, and how to explain the actions of the polish side, because it is clear that their farmers are much closer than any, but still, they understand that if ukraine will lose the war, then they will be next. well, look, in order to prepare a delicious zhurik or borscht, you need to know how to cook it, secondly, choose the right ingredients, and thirdly , put your heart into the preparation of this dish. on unfortunately, all these three components are missing in the current ukrainian-polish relations, and the dish does not work. in order for us to succeed in this, i will emphasize once again, there is no alternative, any other, yes, we must succeed, we need to. put a lot of effort at the expert and public level to convince poles from all the groups we have,

journalists, experts, politicians of all calibers, from all camps, who should go to poland and talk to every pole literally. at the governmental level, we must offer poland a clear vision of why it is beneficial for them to be with ukraine. i recall the recent formula that ukraine decides whether... the united states will be a strategic partner, and in the same way , ukraine may think that it can decide at the official level what kind of partner or non-partner poland will be. in fact, we have to look at things realistically, it is not up to us to decide yet, we are surviving, we are fighting only thanks to the western support, an important component of this support is polish support, we do not have the luxury to just get rid of it, so we have to find decision, and in fact, when... the situation at the border began, i can only see the lonely figure of the deputy minister of infrastructure, who was running along these crossings and the same border and tried desperately to do something,

it was obviously not enough, we still have to choose some side, we communicate more with president duda or with prime minister tusk, they are from different camps, and the concept of bipartisan support does not work here, and we have not done it yet either, it still seems to me that the internet... political, economic, social, cultural, is the key to solving this problem. otherwise, we will return to the dark ages of pis. remember what was done when ukrainians were announced there, i don't even want to mention all these stories, we were all their witnesses. that is, we must not allow a repetition of this situation already in the economy and in relation to the future, not just the past. mr. volodymyr, zelensky announced an honest conversation about the future with the participation of the leadership

of the ukrainian state on sunday, february 25. what kind of conversation do you think it will be, and what kind of conversation is it currently ukrainian society has had enough of talking among themselves, those who rule ukraine, but obviously it is about telling people about what, what we are going to do and where we are going. well, look, president zelenskyy dismissed commander-in-chief zaluzhnyi by stating that the army and war need the latest modern approaches. it seems to me that public administration has long needed the latest modern approaches, both in the context of getting rid of corruption and inefficient management, and in the context of creating a clear vision for ukraine, which... after, after the war, after overcoming the devastation

, where are we going, what is the key to the door of success and prosperity, if... the president of ukraine can formulate it in his sunday address to the nation, well, this is a significant step forward, but it also involves personnel changes , changes in those people who drag both the president of ukraine and our ukraine to the bottom. i would like to believe that there will be enough courage, this personal courage, which was lacking in the presidential decree on awarding valery zuluzhny the hero of ukraine, well, what will it be after all... on the political agenda, because if we really want to win, radical changes are needed in politics, it definitely needs renewal, both internally and externally. i'm not talking about these security memoranda that we talk about so much, the italian minister's response today was more than telling about the nature of this document, so that means

it's a beautiful story, but we can't bet on it, either ... and sunday's press conference is a beautiful story, she an important story to speak frankly to the nation, but if there are no answers about the future and the vision of the leader of the country, where he is taking it, i think the consequences of this press conference could be worse than if it was not held at all. thank you, mr. volodymyr, it was volodymyr omelyan, a serviceman of the armed forces of ukraine, former minister of infrastructure. of ukraine. friends, we work live on the tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms, and we conduct surveys on youtube and on tv. today we are you we ask this: do you believe that the war will end with the return of all territories? yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube. if you 're watching us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote. if you believe that the war will end with the return of all

territories 0800-211-381, no 0800-211-382 all ring. these numbers are free, call, at the end of the program we will sum up the results of this vote. next, we have volodymyr tsybulko, political expert, deputy of the fourth convocation of the verkhovna rada of ukraine. mr. volodymyr, i i congratulate you and thank you for being with us today. congratulations, glory to ukraine. glory to heroes. let's start our story with how biden emphasized his attitude to vladimir putin, because today he said that putin is a crooked son of a bitch, i apologize to our tv viewers, but this is such a quote: during a fund-raising event in san francisco , let's hear how it all went, and we're out of sync, and i quote, we've got a bent son of a bitch, that guy, putin and others, and we always

have to worry about nuclear conflict, but an existential threat to humanity. new climate, the kremlin responded that the united states should be ashamed of such language of the president of the country, and putin, who is currently traveling on his tour somewhere in tatarstan or somewhere he is there, well, in a word, outside the borders of moscow, said that well it was biden who said that, because i said that we support biden, and biden said that i am a son of a bitch, what do you think of biden's words and whether according to these words... will there be any additional actions if he calls him a murderer and a crooked son of a bitch, or whether biden will go for some more tough measures against putin, and not just on the basis of some lexical signs, well, putin , the fact is that putin already irritated biden after this geneva

meeting, it was then that putin was a murderer, yes a murderer. and in fact , we did not hear any remorse for these words, which means that biden has a very tough, such, well, classic attitude towards authoritarian leaders, as to bastards and murderers, and in this he represents exactly the old american political school, where all enemies or enemies are called enemies or in the sense of... this is old school, there is no ambiguity here, this is an unambiguous position, and as we recall, after geneva , biden's aides there tried to soften this formula . putin fought, but biden himself did not