is called the next passage between force and charybdis. recently, i 've noticed that various people are turning to me and saying: what about this criticism, which has been coming almost since the end of last year and at the beginning of this year, which is connected both with the supreme military leadership and with some shortcomings there , supposedly, how to go between force and charybybda, between the fact that one cannot help criticizing the government. but it is also impossible to criticize the government in such a way that it may threaten national interests, and here absolutely, even in my case, i i just don't know the answer to this question, because you can't be silent, but you can't either, sometimes i hear that this is what is called in russian, generality, sorry, words, i apologize to the national council for television and radio broadcasting, well, you understand, if this question were so... uska

, if we solve it, then everything is fine immediately, in my opinion, it is a little wider, in fact, this model of reconciliation needs a new one in the conditions of a long war, when all the hardships of ordinary life return, in particular negative democracy we need to learn to compete politically in the absence of political struggle. we need to learn how to introduce and implement self-government in conditions where there is no electoral possibility of re-election. self-governing bodies and their ability to exercise their powers, we have to learn a great many things during war in a new way, such as we have not done before. regarding the criticism of the government, i have a personal answer that i found for myself, but to what extent it is acceptable for the general public in general, it is directly proportional to the extent to which society lives with a fanatical syndrome or not, whether it is ready to look at politics not through the prism of its... preferences first of all,

first of all through the prism of state interest and then already political preferences. very simply, this formula sounds as follows: it is necessary to criticize, but not the abstract government, not name-calling in advance, but concrete steps, actions and ideas that are relayed specifically by representatives of the government, i.e. slapping the hands at the moment when they do something wrong, and vice versa. to support, even if they are political opponents, even if... it's a politician you don't like, if he takes the right actions, the right steps, because at the moment we 're all in the same boat and we need ukraine to survive and be in it both ruling and opposition politicians , both left and right, both good and bad, and different, because ukraine, it is different, but in order for this to happen, we need to demonstrate more restraint and more cohesion and tolerance towards each other, and accordingly, if we are talking about criticism, then criticism... should be, but

self-censorship should not be in the amount of it or in the presence of criticism, in that it should not be about personalities, but about actions. then it seems to me rational, but you yourself know how much society is ready for this, and this is a difficult topic, because it is a general cultural topic, i know, in addition to what you said, which i agree with to a certain extent, maybe i agree to a large extent, i am also talking about word formation, because the same for... and the same criticism, you can, you can criticize in different ways, you can say that you you do, you are all thieves and peddlers , or one might say, listen, and if you did this, maybe look more carefully, it could be better, if we speak and strive to do better, then it is better to speak, well, in a friendly tone, to find friendly words , and if we say a fool is a fool, well, it's me... somehow

it doesn't look very good, and then it really sows some panicky moods, everything is gone, but my question is next, and it goes further, how much do you think it's serious , and now we will fly a little outside of ukraine, as much as possible this story is serious about the transnistrian deputies, that they will gather there, ask putin for help, to become part of the rsfsr or whatever it is called there now. i look at this with a smile, i don't see any chances, but maybe i'm missing something, mr. oleg, and right away, first, the russian contingent that is in transnistria, it will not pose any serious threat to ukraine, moreover , it today it is cut off from russia, logistically, physically, it is staffed mostly by locals who have never fought, but planned and don't want to, they just get a salary, that is, from all... parameters, it

's not about a military threat in addition, and so that these so-called deputies don't accept some kind of appeal, so that putin doesn't then say on february 29 on... . 300 years ago, i would not have known that and i would have been happy, but this does not pose a military threat to us now, it is clear that russia is annexing, not annexing, because of that there is no more longing for them there, it is another matter that taking a step , if we take the hypothesis, there can be many options, from some scumbag from the series mountain gave birth to a mouse, we are so many. times watched, they can say that they are under blockade, from both sides, in short, all scoundrels, the format that was peaceful, slip, in short, russia help, save, become a mediator and show moldova, romania, ukraine, the americans there , who cares about kuskinomat, protect us from

the blockade, well, in this way, putin is simply led as, relatively speaking, be a negotiator for us as a parliamentarian, this is such a light option, i don’t believe in him much, i’ll be honest, but from this is the least... reaching the point that they can turn directly to the government harbor, relying there on the so-called referendum of 2006, on the preliminary decision of the sixth such congress of deputies at all fake levels, and accordingly , then what does russia get? putin receives a pre-election injection for turnout, he has up to 20%, plus or minus 20, stubborn, i'm sorry, but an imperial voter who listens to various and series of arrow bitters and so on. and he does not see in putin a strong leader who is now decisive enough and bloodthirsty enough, and accordingly he needs this the injection that he will give, and they will say , well, yes, here is good old putin, again the collector of lands and everything else, but on the contrary , they get attention for the deterioration of the situation in moldova for themselves, because now

pro-russian sentiments dominate and they have chance to defeat maya sanda electorally, in this case they lose these opportunities, the pro-russian positions realized that they are getting a breather inside moldova itself. secondly, they get a problem with this region, which is cut off from them, and they can't do anything, and ukraine gets the opportunity to at the moment to carry out a military operation, for example , at the request of moldova, or to turn to moldova and say that if you do not restore order yourself, our enemies are running there, accordingly, we will restore this order ourselves, well, from there, it is only a question of international mechanisms , how it should happen in legal forms, but for russia this is a problem, they are not stupid, although they can be... banal, bloodthirsty, but they understand that these minuses appear in them, so i am inclined to thoughts that if indeed they will follow the scenario, ala joining, then it will not be for the sake of joining, it will be for the sake of destabilizing the situation, most likely, i would then pay attention, make a sausage, or

something similar, the russians can declare that it was ukraine who decided to commit a provocation, or attacked, or something else, and they will use this noise in order to try to destabilize the situation in moldova as a whole, that is, it will be... it will just be arson on the periphery, and in order to use this noise to try to prevent some ala state rebellion or full haatization in moldova, that's how an element of the strategy to destabilize moldova , i see such a group of transnistria, this is the only rational option that comes to my mind at the moment, there is also a principled one, i just apologize, please forgive me for crossing, i can't, i can't control myself despite what i think will be criticized... for this there will be questions, navalny, his death is a factor, it is such a big factor, i am not saying what exactly, i am not asking you whether people will go out into the street, and we, and you, and we, and you and i understood that no one would get anywhere, and so on and so forth, but does it still

mean something in the long run, and i would hope that it could mean, well, at least micro not... a weakening of the putin regime? i would divide the question into two and very briefly. navalny has demonstrated that neither living nor dead russians need him. no one came out to protect him, not even alive, no one came out to continue his work after his death. secondly, his influence was much greater in the west, as the image of a key positioner, than it really was in russia. he is in russia there was that political factor which affects just as much as it can be ignored. that is, in general. equation, he didn't play any serious meaningful role, even while in prison, although it symbolically elevated him, but the fact that he was killed and killed on the first day of the minus conference, when navalna was there, how it was reported, how it was set up, all this suggests that it was a kind of manifesto, or

a quasi-speech of putin in munich, and a message both internally to the elites and externally to the world that the transit from the authoritarian regime of totalitarianism... has been passed, and this is the final distance, period. putin has no alternative. if someone inside or outside wants to play an alternative to putin, that person will simply be destroyed. as well as those who want to play such an alternative. putin about... demonstrated this very loudly during the munich conference, and the question of whether putin has become weaker because of this, it lies half a step back, he was forced to do this because the situation under him began to shake, and and here i can go and show it because of the situation with nadezhdin, who was not a winter compass, but rather a thermometer for measuring the situation with russian society, and, as we understood, it was not the armpit that was measured. they took him out and were horrified, i can see from the interview with tucker carlson

putin, referring to him, in many parameters, all this shows that russian society has begun to turn away from the war, to push it to the periphery, actually, as it happened in our country with the anti-terrorist operation , and then later the operation of the combined forces, the war somewhere in the east, but the russians now have a war somewhere in the west, and they turn it off, just they turn on the tv when they see it. and this shows, in particular, together with sociology, that the nuclear putin voter is maturing in the demand for an alternative, that is, some new putin, but only less sarcastic and less aggressive, who will not scare everyone with possible mobilization, other things, so that everything will be fine. and nadezhnin demonstrated it. this frightened the kremlin, judging by everything, and it was necessary to send such a loud message that any alternative was not close at all. no one will play it and there will be no democratic decorations russia no longer needs a totalitarian regime

, full stop, putin is eternal, yes, but you understand , there is a bit of a contradiction in your thoughts, that on the one hand, he is stronger than ever, and there was such a medvedchuk who said that there we are stronger than ever, and on the other hand, he weaker than ever because he is forced to shoot already , that is, to kill, and to kill even the last ones... the tyrant does not want, he would like everyone to clap their hands and smile at him, this, this is the dream of every tyrant, so how, how much more is there , well, if the danger for putin, to what extent a mass dead hundred is a danger for putin, there is no contradiction here, the problem here is that this ala strong step, it is not a step of demonstration, it is not a step of strength, it is a step of trying to demonstrate strength in the conditions of... , when there is a need to demonstrate strength, and the need, it demonstrates that the putin regime is weak

, if everything was fine, he would not have taken this step, you are absolutely right, and the killing of navalny is a demonstration inside that the situation is really bad for him that he took this step, of course, the elites a little scares, but this is the last hope , putin's weapon was killed, and in the west it shows that with these scoundrels, let's say it so that it sounds censorious... you can't have any business, you can't talk to anyone there, there will be no conversations with putin . you can see what the reactions were in munich, and moreover, a number of communications show that behind-the-scenes reactions are much tougher, and many of those in the west who still had some illusions, plus or minus, that putin is rational, can somehow some circumstances, etc., it was necessary to see them obscene language, because they still had some hope, putin himself. she was shot together with navalny in their eyes, i think that for russia the coming months will show very interesting,

unpleasant surprises, because thank you, thank you, thank you, sorry, mr. oleg, oleg sahakyan, political scientist, co-founder of the national platform for stability and cohesion, was with us, thank you very much, now it's advertising, then we will fly to poland from russia, something important is happening there in poland, everything important that happens in poland is known in poland by the best myroslav cech, a polish politician. public figure, but all this after a four-minute commercial. and what do you think about lakalut fix? fixes reliably, my dentist advised me. yes, and particles of food do not get under the prosthesis. and the price is good, the right choice for my retirement. lacalut fix is ​​a new cream for extra-strong fixation of dentures and healthy gums. so your choice is laut fix. meet the new product, a profitable package of 70 g. there are

discounts on afida max of 10% in psylsnyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. do ordinary things become unreal? heavy bags, not for my patient back for back pain, try dolgit cream. dolgit cream relieves pain, reduces swelling and improves joint mobility. scream dolgit, whatever you want, i'll pick it up. dolgit - the only yellow cream for joint and back pain. the average price is for muscle spasms dolgit anti-spasm pills dolgit anti-spasms for muscle and calf relaxation, turn on the investigation that makes the heart chill, the new chapter of the hbo series in... a real detective, find out what secrets the alaskan ice hides, exclusively in the megogo subscription. there are discounts on penger and herpavir, 15% in psyllanyk, bam and pharmacies savings there are discounts on templegin pills, 15% in psarynyk, pam and oskad pharmacies. and what will be born, you will see. poems that unite a nation

across generations. the telniuk sisters sound special in lviv with the program of our shevchenko, a musical interpretation with a symphony orchestra that inspires to believe, fight, live march 11 in the zankovec sister telniuk theater, don't miss tickets to contramarka ua, live sound, there are discounts on icelandika lozenges , 15% in pharmacies plantain, bam and ochad. 10 years of war, war for freedom, from the revolution of dignity to today's battles if something happens to me, if it doesn't happen to me, then i know that i died for the truth. 10 years of war, the war for our existence, this is the path that changed us. in

the conditions of occupied territories, de-occupied territories, we have losses of the order of potential 7 million hectares of land, which have not been cultivated for two years. 10 years of war, war for the future, what price do we pay for it? 200 million of our citizens were taken to russia, depopulation is an inevitable thing, intellectuals, specialists, patriots about challenges, threats and our future in a special projects for the 10th anniversary of the beginning of russia's armed aggression against ukraine 10 years of the war for independence from february 18 on espresso. watch at 21: news. results of the week. historical struggle. in the first days of the large-scale invasion, generals from the pentagon declared that kyiv would fall within a matter of days, and predicted that the armed forces of ukraine

would reach crimea within a year. the reality turned out to be different. they protected the capital. the battles in the kyiv region restrained the enemy onslaught and shortened the lists of elite russian units. the village of moschun became an outpost to kyiv. at the price of one's own life, at the price hello, we did it. the russians have an aircraft carrier. the defenders destroyed eight enemy birds in a week. but boryspil airport is able to prepare its infrastructure for flights in three weeks. that until the resumption of operational activities the airport will be open as soon as the appropriate risk assessment is completed and flight permits are issued, exclusive material about this and much more, watch espresso at 21. good health again, ladies and gentlemen, my name is mykola veresen , our program continues, as i

promised, myroslav cech, polish politician and public figure, now with us and you already see him. thank you, mr. myroslav , for volunteering to talk with us on saturday evening, but my question, you know, is like this, you know, i would say a little, a little ironic, but a little and so bad, but for a long time , mr. myroslav, you and i will try to understand what is happening on the ukrainian-polish border, because you, and i, and many other experts say that it... can be solved, it is not an extremely difficult problem, and we are with you, so i don't mind that it is not extremely difficult the problem has been since october at the end of february, we are trying to do something about this not-so-complicated problem, and then the question arises as to who is behind it, and

why the polish defense does not look at those people. who can stand behind what we cannot solve, obviously, meaning that it can be solved, but it is not solved, mr. myroslav, it was you who was punished by the lord god, because of what you had the idea is that poland is already everything, europe, polish politics is more or less understandable, rational and so on, here it turns out that we are discussing and we are trying to solve this issue with you, none, but reality... as it is amenable to logic, defensive polish, nothing, as they stood and blocked, so they stand, yesterday i moved one of the checkpoints, and looked at this one, the so -called against. blockades and so on, nothing has changed since october, there were five skaliks, you know, a man, blocked traffic, a border crossing, one police car and

that's it, well, the ukrainians will not storm these checkpoints, because then such problems will arise and so on, that is, it is nothing regret has not changed, the problem can be solved in the way that both ukrainian and polish politicians began to talk about it, it should be noted... the position of prime minister donald tusk, who said that the checkpoints and the roads leading to them will become objects of critical infrastructure, i.e. they essentially come under the control of the government security center, this is very good, although the minister of internal affairs clarified, it does not prevent it. protests at the border, it, it helps to solve provocative moments and so on, but unfortunately, these words

the minister of internal affairs has already received an objection from unknown persons, who have started again to dump ukrainian grain, ukrainian legumes, which are transiting through poland, that is, once again, until there is a decision by terdo. and a strong will to solve this issue, that the border cannot be blocked as such , outsiders cannot be there, only the services that are responsible for it, on the one hand, from the polish state, respectively from the ukrainian side, unfortunately, the situation will not move, because it has a huge political component, apart from everything else other, unfortunately, poland has already started to conduct such tough. e negotiations regarding the terms of ukraine's accession to the european union, this political component, is it the april elections again, is this what we are talking about, when we say the political

component, is it an internal political, internal-polish-political component, or is it some international component? no, of course there is an international component, because this is the so-called green system, against which farmers in many countries oppose. european countries, although, as experts say, when you ask a farmer, which stands on this border, and what for you is such a green system, in what it is bad and so on, they name only one factor, one record, that there, they say, there will be fallow land, as someone agrees to it, and farms more than 10 hectares, 4% of the area, during the year, they. is not sown, well, there is grain, respectively, and so on, i don’t want to enter those crops that are sown there, which are used as

natural fertilizers, that is, in which a lot of nitrogen is produced, well, they are then plowed, accordingly, nitrogen is natural, this return to the ecological use of the land, so that climate change does not cause us discomfort and does not make us from the earth. unsuitable for simply living in it, which we have also observed in recent years, and this is the only factor, just as you know, you ask a polish farmer who stands at protests, and what is coming from ukraine that just makes it difficult for you life goes on and so on, but grain, but grain has not been going to poland from ukraine since april, the last shipments there went in august, that's all, the rest is all transit in... indeed, all this is built , unfortunately, on myths, fakes, which are used by large landowners, polish latofundists and agricultural holdings, which do not want

to allow any competition from ukraine on their territory, contrary to the agreement on world free trade and the agreement on the association of ukraine with the eu, any violation of agreements. of all legislation happens, unfortunately, and unfortunately, the basic, absolutely basic norms of international law are violated, when transit is blocked, the territory of poland, here immediately arises, i apologize, the question that ukrainian grain, ukrainian agricultural products, is the enemy of polish farmers, okay, and then why is russian allowed to be allowed calmly, because it is not forced that i am told, that this is also such a surprise that ukrainians are not, and russian easily enters through belarus, through kaliningrad.

there are no strikes, i.e. there is no threat to the polish farmer from russian grain, only from ukrainian, so not so much grain from russia is imported to belarus, it is more problematic for portugal in italy, in fact, when you look at the statistics, agricultural products from russia account for 4.4% of all agro, agricultural products in the entire european union, ukrainian - it is 9%, so everything is actually put on the head, but in the end, i just like mr. puri, you know, the nhp, our tycoon, started very actively, well, to enter the french market, immediately the cry began to be raised from the french farmers, president macron said: we have a ukrainian oligarch coming here, and he is now on this

money and he is on. .. and earns money from this so further, well, the owner of mhp was indignant , of course, he is his company, i know a little from the photos how it is arranged there, it is an absolutely global, global company that meets all the parameters of products in the european union, that is, there is nothing threatening here, that is, ukrainian chicken is a threat, and chicken from brazil is no longer a threat, which comes in uncontrolled quantities, as well as... just brazilian chicken is imported from brazil, it probably feeds on coffee, they drink coffee, brazilian chickens and it turns out delicious meat, and ukrainians are not coffee, and here is the answer to your question, no, you know, it would be possible to take it all in a light, ironic way, which we both like, if it wasn't for one act, if it weren't for the war, then you can

i would say to myself, lord, this same owner of mhp , he has enough money for a good advertising campaign, the ukrainian state should help him in this and the normal game is going on and so on, let the advertising campaign raise everything, discussions, debates, show and consume and flash mobs can be done dear, but ukraine is at war, it is bleeding, the ukrainian agricultural sector provides 60% of revenue, currency revenue, export revenue for ukraine, and it is known that the army is financed from the ukrainian budget, well, people are good, or you want to strengthen ukraine on normal principles, and you declare and talk about it, everyone is grateful for the help and so on, but at the same time you are just hitting the economy of ukraine, hitting very hard, well, you can't live like this in such schizophrenia, this is one aspect, but the second

aspect. of this matter, well, you know, the same duty-free importation of products has begun of the european union with ukraine, it was introduced only for the swarm, and it continues with an eye on the continuation of the war, there is a war that russia is waging now to the exhaustion of ukraine, the destruction of the infrastructure, the economy of ukraine and so on, this is temporary, then when the negotiations on the accession of ukraine begin to the european union, and concrete return to the status quo. to the conditions and so on, then we turn to how much money will be received from the common budget of ukraine, and so on, and the third factor, in fact, the export of ukrainian agricultural products to the european union, it non-critical for ukraine, non-critical, such 5% of ukrainian agricultural products now go through the territory of poland and to poland itself, thanks to the armed forces of ukraine, the help of the british,

romania and bulgaria first of all. ukraine managed to establish its own grain corridor, thanks to the same corridor ukraine's gdp in 2024, as the british the guardian wrote, will grow, should grow by 10%, and budget revenues will grow by 5-6%. thank you very much, mr. myroslav, i apologize, myroslav, a czech politician and public figure, was with us on communication, and now the news from espresso, from... i give her the floor, and you can already see her, congratulations, thank you for your work, the news team will continue to work in this edition, in particular, about the fact that the muscovites want to disrupt the plan on the supply of western weapons to ukraine, details of this news and others in a moment.