i see changes, they are much better, their attitude to this war, to ukraine in this war, i think that at least they understand how dangerous it is for them, that putin is not only our enemy, he is the enemy of all of europe, i think , that they understood, well at least they understood that he will continue this war, and that's exactly... that's why the leaders of european countries began to increase the production of ammunition, in particular 155 mm caliber ammunition, many other positions as well, will this be enough, i expressed his opinion in one interview, i did not i remember what kind of interview it was, but i frankly said that i think that the issue is not in ammunition. for your country, the question is not in

empty warehouses, because you gave us something, sometimes you gave a lot to ukraine, the question in society is that societies are not ready to fight, and you want it, god forbid putin will come to you, but believe me to me, that at the beginning of the ukrainian tragedy back in... 2014, there was no readiness there, because you will not start a war, so i think it is important to strengthen ukraine so that ukraine is strong, powerful, and it is also important for italy to put an end to this war, to put an end to putin here in ukraine. thank you. tv channel, rada tv channel, please. mr. president, congratulations. there is different information about

losses in the war, at the same time, this is a struggle for world democracy, our partners recognize this, our european neighbors declare this, but can you name what price ukraine is paying, thank you, i don't know if i have the right , this is sir'. just a very moment, let 's start with a moment, recently there have been voices in the radical part of some american audience of politicians that are not on our side, they said how many more victims do you want, ukraine lost 3,000 dead, then there was information from the russians who said that...

31 thousand ukrainians died, the military died in this war, neither 300,000 nor 150 thousand, what is putin lying about behind his lying circle, but nevertheless, each of these losses is a great loss for us. russia... 180,000 of them died

, the total number of dead and wounded in russia is 180 deaths, i don't know how many missing they have, and i know that up to 500 are wounded, 31,000 ukrainians, and it is very painful for us, i no... i will say how many wounded, because russia will know how many people left the battlefield, i just won't say about it, there are missing persons, i will not play with this, with these numbers, i don't want to, why, because the last exchange indicated that we 're going to be inaccurate with you because a brought back a few people and they were on the missing persons list and they... two guys,

they came back alive so i'm not going to say anything here. and tens of thousands in the temporarily occupied territories. dead civilians, we know about tens of thousands, i don't know how many of them died , killed, murdered, tortured, how many were deported, there are, you know, there are some lists, but they are all, we do not know how many they killed ours and civilians, we do not know, we will find out when we finish with him, with this russia, please, in the same part. recently, boris johnson was here, and great britain had several prime ministers , there will be another election in the fall, and now

there will most likely be a new prime minister, have you met kiestam? and one more question about... long range or not, whether you can to confirm that stormshadows have been provided yet , but the united kingdom provided us with storm shadows, and we used them and used them in large numbers, we are very grateful to his team, to the society of britain, i did not understand. part of your question about me meeting someone there, eh? future, maybe? kay stamer is the leader of labor, and now

he is leading by 25% according to the polls, well, it's your decision who will be the new prime minister, but i ... met with the prime minister, with the team, with the opposition, when he was in parliament so yes, i would say that i have a good relationship, the voice of america, come on, okay, mr. president, you mentioned the peace summit, the peace summit, there will be a nato summit in washington later this year. ukraine is asking nato for an invitation to nato, like you, so far neither germany nor the united states have given such signals that there will be such an invitation, what risks do you think there are in nato, if such an invitation is given, and

in general to international security, if such an invitation is not forthcoming done thank you. thank you for your question, invitation depends. for today with all due respect to all partners, v in principle, i understand that all partners support the country in extending an invitation to us , and everyone believes that ukraine will be in nato in the future, but you are right, in principle, i do not want to play with words now, well, as of today, from the united states of america, this decision depends on germany, this is a fact, and what are the risks , i... i can't tell you, i don't see any risks in inviting ukraine, ukraine to nato, i don't see in this the risks that are behind the scenes of official policy sound, or will sound and sound, they all relate to membership

of ukraine in nato, and it seems to me that putin's reaction is based on risks associated with inadequacy. i weigh at this stage in the invitation , there are no risks, or i don't know something, if not, if not invited, what are the risks for the nationals, if we are not invited, then we will not be invited, the ukrainian truth, let's, eh... shall i take it? roman kravets, the ukrainian truth? i actually want to talk a little bit about the past. 2019, december 9, paris, normandy meeting, you, merkel, macron, putin. we all remember the photos, shots from

the press conference, but there was another meeting where there were no photo cameras, where there were no cameras, you met face-to-face with putin. and actually , a lot is known about this meeting. very little, only the fact is known, and now seems like a good time to talk about it, what happened at that meeting, how did putin treat you, what did you talk about? and in general, what happened behind closed doors when you were face to face? thank you. and what does it mean, how putin treated me. in what key? we had a long conversation in different tones. i told him that there are no people in minsk will work, because the very topic of the withdrawal of troops

during the summer solstice is not working, i explained to him with very specific numbers, i had, i already had experience, i crossed the contact line then, and i had experience, how long, do you remember, we had the first steps of withdrawal, and i showed him that look at the general numbers, what time we took, i showed him that we would be 20'. withdraw, and this means that we will be in such a state of frozen conflict for 20 years, which suggests that the war is not over, here what else did we talk about, we talked about it for a long time, negotiated, and also, the second issue was the story about gas, about the court that we won, but you know how they react to the won processes, and there was... .we had an acceptance that they would still

transfer the money to us, we got the money then, and the third question we had was about the exchange, and then we changed more than 100 people, well, and he kept raising the issue of syfire, you know, but how can it work what you and i have already seen for several months. something there i tried to work, but still there were three losses later, well, in principle, there was a conversation about this one, there was no tonality , i was surprised , i was surprised during personal contact, i don’t remember anymore, to be honest , i think we all had it in a different way i don't really remember all the details in life and in society, to be honest, we need to sit down, think, remember all these details, i remember. it was very long, very,

very long, it was all very long, well, that's all, doicheveli, please, at the end here from this side, thank you, mr. president, how important are german missiles for ukraine? why, as far as you understand, why the germans still do not give them, it is important for us, and for us, i am grateful, in principle, i am grateful to the chancellor, he has shown leadership in europe, he has the most powerful treaty with us and serious support, and for us it is very important these weapons that you said, and i will tell you yes, the united states, and then germany, and so in everything always. i don't mean that the chancellor depends

on the president, but that the order of action, in terms of deciding on certain types of weapons, and in my experience, it's always been this way: if the united states took a step forward, then we could also to speak and give it as an example to others, look, we have from... respectively weapons, well, let's go ahead and work with you, that's all, and since i'm in a positive mood about the united states, i believe that we will have a result everywhere , lci, france. thank you very much, mr. president, when you talk to our western partners. or not, do you get the feeling that any of them are still afraid of the complete

defeat of russia in ukraine? are there strategic insights into this? and the second point, regarding the possibility of supplying france with the mirage-200 planes in the near future, can it happen? that's how we talked about planes, thank you, please, rbc ukraine, milan lily charbaka

ukraine, mr. president, in the current war of attrition, russia has engaged. by supporting a number of totalitarian dictatorial regimes and hopes to wait until the west gets tired of supporting ukraine. on the other hand , aid to ukraine from the side of some western countries is being hampered due to their internal political processes. and their industrial complex did not reach a sufficient level either. so, first, for what ukraine can count on exhaustion in this war. and secondly, what should ukraine do if one of our... key partners still decides to withdraw from the distance, thank you, work diplomatically so that no one withdraws from the distance, it depends not only on us, but also on us, and it also depends on the societies of these or other countries, unfortunately, i have to state that it depends on the election processes, during the elections, if the society

supports your aid to ukraine, then you will be helped, if not, then you will either not or will reduce it, or you will lose the support of society, well, here the most courageous people fight, even fight with public opinion, to help ukraine, and i will tell you frankly, i know there are very few, very few, who lost their positions as heads of state for the sake of supporting ukraine, because what, what... against public opinion, and many leaders changed public opinion, especially in those states where the presence, at least the informational presence of russia, prevailed for many years, they changed, they broke, and they really told the truth to society, and they began to understand , where they are live, that is, i would thank them here, and that is why

someone may leave at a distance, but someone may come, we... work on others, on the support of other continents, it is more difficult, europe is the most powerful in this sense and the united states, europe, because she understands that the war is not somewhere over here, but the united states is our leader , partners who understand that we are fighting for democracy, and russia will definitely, definitely weaken all this if it defeats us, the alternative is drones, the alternative is our inside production, it is very good, i am talking about it said, and this is a fact, and i think that the minister of defense could talk about it, today you had discussions, and yes, there was a state intelligence service, they buy a lot of military equipment there, and i think that together, well, as a group, as they say , yes, and that's why we will get, as i said, a million plus, so it will be of different types, in

principle, some types of drones, you know, do not work now as an artillery shell and sometimes they can even be cheaper, because because of the war in ukraine, even an ordinary artillery shell that cost 1,500 dollars or 1,500 euros at the beginning of the war, today we already see some contracts that people come out with offers from four to eight, that's what war is, and to whom war, and to whom yes, and therefore big business, therefore money . can also help, i'll tell you honestly, there are countries that we don't talk about out loud, and there is purely commercial interest, there it doesn't matter how many people we have, what will be with us there, there is money, because there is an appropriate number of shells, but that nevertheless, we do not condemn them, on the contrary, we fight for each, for each projectile, there are states, i am very grateful

the nordics, especially, who do not have, for example , there, and they buy everything... they are also not asked because of our personal, special relationships, where they take it all, take it, let me say this, well done, take it as they find it, well, such people, when it is small, sorry, denmark is a big country for us, when they find everywhere, when they work on it every day, when their societies are at the beginning, well, all the nordics were skeptical about our... european future, and today is completely on our side, it means that that they know who putin is, understand what kind of enemy he is and talk about the fact that leaders are always a lot... it depends on leaders, leaders communicate with their people, with society, explain, show, well done people , that they support their public opinion, i met with mete, mete

, recently we met in lviv, and there , imagine, the support of ukraine among the public is growing, after two years of war, it is growing, this indicates that the state united inside is very strong. country which chose for herself for ukraine, that means simply against the war. it seems to me that this is a very correct position. okay. tv channel fridom, please. congratulations, mr. president, oleg borisov, tv channel freedom. is a meeting with president erdogan planned in the near future? if yes, then... please tell me whether it will be raised, whether there are plans to help erdogan in the release of not only prisoners of war, but also political prisoners of the kremlin since the 14th year, i will casually

remind riman celal , who was detained at the administrative border after the crimean platform. thanks, yes, soon. i do not yet have a meeting with president erdogan. we meet at different levels. we have contact. he, turkey, qatar, united arab emirates. saudi arabia. countries with which we work with exchange lists. exchange, including crimean. tatars, crimeans, not only crimean tatars, of course there are many of them and crimeans, many journalists, and just political prisoners,

yes, creative people, there are many different people, unfortunately, it is captured, these lists, here we work around these these four countries, whatever please canada, global mail. thank you, mr. president, we were talking about the political processes in the west earlier, as far as public opinion is concerned, we're seeing a little bit of a drop in support from 30 to 20, what about that, tell me, are you concerned about that? and in a global sense, not just in canada. and one more question, if putin calls you at night today, will you pick up the phone or not? he

doesn't have a cell phone, how will he call me, and i no longer work with telegraph 1917. he won't call me, he doesn't want to end this war. that's it for today. yes, weakening their army on the battlefield, weakening them with political isolation, political in the world, weakening them with sanctions, and honestly, you know what, to make putin poor, money is number one for him, if you will hear his messaging is all about money and he keeps that money safe, even frozen assets abroad, so i think his weak spot is, well, public opinion, but among the businesses that support him, or fear that there is even today in russia, i believe that this is his weak point,

if everyone takes part, and the assets are frozen today, to be honest, all the assets, i don't remember, they are 900 million, no, no, 300, no, not assets, there are various assets, i really don't remember the total amount, well even in europe frozen assets. 300 billion. and therefore, if this money is transferred simply without any conditions, it will be transferred to ukraine. i think it will weaken him a lot. he will not be able to protect the business around him, his own business, big business, oligarchs, etc., which is unsustainable. it's bloodless, but it would be very apt, me i think so... it will weaken him, then he will call everyone, not only me, he will call everyone and look for ways to end this war, and

what else did you ask? 25% now, and what does that say, what is the point of the question, that more canadians say that there is already too much support for ukraine. i agree that 70%,

if that is the case, canadians are right, more should be given. kyivpost, please, i always knew that canadians are on our side, mostly that these are people on our side, i was in canada, i saw people with ukrainian flags, there were ukrainian canadians everywhere along the roads, i i know they're on our side, on our side, so... you know, yesterday we had a very constructive dialogue with justin, and more importantly, we signed a huge document with canada about 3 billion in support for this year, in particular, and this document for 10 years, he said yesterday, maybe even more, more than 10 years, until ukraine is not, mr. president, maryna shashkova, kyivpost publication, two short questions, what would you answer?

politicians in the west and in ukraine, who are supporters of the idea of ​​your legitimacy as president since may of this year, and the second the question of how you see the dialogue with the russians on the eve of the so-called presidential elections there, thank you, as i do, what do you see as the dialogue with the russians on the eve of the so-called presidential elections there? , as you said, maybe inside ukraine, this is the narrative and program of the russian federation, the relevant documents, all the intelligence, the seven have, it is in principle clear to everyone that this is a program. russians,

everyone is against it, absolutely everyone, well, it will be here emmanuel, for example, macron, the closest of the seven, you can ask him a question , he will answer, not only that it does not sound very fun, some of them even tell me the names of those who are inside us, who raise this narrative, a bad idea, i treat this as... a treasonous position towards ukraine, but nevertheless, well, it's a bad idea that this is a program, a specific program, there are documents that confirm it, a program of the russian federation, i know that some journalists in the united states there are also these documents, that's what regarding legitimacy, and regarding, that is, in the document there is even the money that is allocated, the amount of money that i foresee.

to some or other institutions to raise this topic , i won't say, i saw, i saw, but as for the dialogue with the russians, and what should i talk about with them, they had one, their, their personal opposition politician was... in prison , they killed him, and there is no need to say now how, they killed him, by the kremlin, they killed him, and they and where, where is their answer, as society, as the public, but simply as people, it is theirs citizen, i recently i spoke with journalists american proce, he also asks me, and why me?