analyzing, he said that individual nato countries are considering the issue of sending troops to ukraine based on bilateral agreements with ukraine, and further he says that this gives him goosebumps , but this is the right of every country. now regarding... the option you are talking about: firstly, if we take the military countries of nato, and this was demonstrated today, in particular, by the chief of staff of the netherlands, saying that any option for the development of events should not be discounted, and it is necessary be ready to any development of events, including... the one we are talking about, it will be found

now that we need to equip ourselves now, he is talking about this and sending troops to ukraine, but we must be ready for any development events regarding whether, on the basis of bilateral agreements, nato countries , including, can deploy troops to ukraine, i want to say once again that no one, no document denies such a possibility, moreover, if you look at the already signed agreements with countries on security cooperation, there there are no direct indications on this, but there from the content, because any agreement, apart from the fact that it has a formal side, it also has content and is interpreted as a whole, there and from the content follows the probability and possibility of such a course of events, it is not obligatory connection there is a probability and

a possibility of such a course of events, it is not an obligation, but it is a likely option, i emphasize this, moreover, this option cannot be canceled, including nato. it is decided in accordance with the national legislation, constitutions of all countries that concluded similar agreements with ukraine. now, the likely option that you... said that if in the case of such an option the führer of moscow attacks any member of nato in response, in this case there is an unequivocal requirement of the fifth article of the charter of the north atlantic bloc to defend any - which state, and it is absolutely irrelevant here , how the fuhrer of moscow and...

his clique will interpret the event and the behavior of lithuania, estonia, latvia or any nato member, in the event that they give ukraine to ukraine as a state on the basis of bilateral agreements, relevant military assistance. therefore with from my point of view, this shriek, which has now started from the pope to washington, is only a political... shriek, and if we talk about the military headquarters of the armed forces and within nato, and national governments, including the pentagon, then none they do not exclude such an option, moreover, if you carefully read the article of the washington post, which is called last week, what the americans learned from the ukrainians, then it is included there. and

it is noted that only direct participation in such events can give serious skills in order to conduct the conditions, to conduct the war in the current conditions, it is therefore obvious, and this has been known for a long time, that most countries not only conduct training, and analyze the development of events on the russian-ukrainian front, but also build even... separate operational-tactical actions on the basis of what is happening on the russian-ukrainian front, and now, even in individual headquarters , new units are being assembled, based on the lessons that these states take, studying the situation on the russian-ukrainian front, from here it becomes obvious to me that question the involvement of troops on the basis of... bilateral

agreements of nato countries to participate in countering russian aggression is only a matter of time, and this shriek, which is now... taking place, is only evidence that on the eve of the elections to the european parliament, everyone is trying to make ends meet , so as not to fall, but the situation with the threat of the russian aggressor, it will very quickly bring to mind those who do not understand the thesis that was recently voiced that there is an opportunity to stop the aggressor in ukraine, if someone does not understand this, then there will be a stop. at his home, by the way, and mr. roman, they understand in poland that ukraine is now stopping the aggressor, because we now see such a wide panorama of what is happening in the bilateral relations between ukraine and poland, and it looks quite unacceptable and ugly,

because in poland the roads leading to the ukrainian border are blocked , our government officials for some reason are going to the ukrainian border to meet with donald tusk'. who did not go there, today tusk said that he is ready to make difficult decisions so that there is no unnecessary tension, but we must find a long-term decision and said that he can temporarily completely close the border for ukrainian goods, although taras kachka today refuted this statement, by the way, how do you look at this situation and what was done right and what was wrong in this story and who is here right, who's to blame? from my point of view, polish politicians should open the works of bigny abdazynski, there it is described in great detail that the future stability of eurasia depends on the strength

of the military-political-economic union of four states: france, germany, poland and of ukraine. what is today. day is happening in poland, as fsb saboteurs are spreading and the behavior of polish protesters, both against ukraine and against germany, shows that in moscow these textbooks were read, in warsaw they forgot about them, and therefore periodically all these people need to be reminded of all these things are sosto. as for the tactics of solving the current issue with the protesting farmers, the answer to it must be formed in brussels, because the reason, the formal reason for these protests is a series of decisions that were taken

within the framework of the european union, regarding the so-called common agricultural policy, but this policy provided for... decisions, relevant procedural decisions within the framework of national governments, that part, and today it must be said honestly, most european governments have slept through this moment, and the corresponding adaptive steps were not taken and led to the fact that it shook farmers' protests, because as you know, they took place starting from... december last year and are still happening now, and this is in the conditions of conducting and preparing, preparing and conducting an election campaign to the european parliament carries a very huge threat, so it is obvious that this requires a corresponding meeting

within the framework of the european government, the european council, and such a meeting last monday was already... taking place, where tactical steps for the introduction of a common agricultural policy are discussed within the framework of the european union. its main components, which most annoy farmers, are the so-called green agreement, the content of which is primarily the processes of decarbonization, minimization of mineral fertilizers, all kinds of poisonous substances, etc. further the next step is the introduction of organic farming methods that minimize the use of chemicals and so on, and balancing the use of land resources in each state. i would like to remind you that in accordance

with international standards, soil fertility in any state should not exceed 30%. to date... a number of european countries have crossed the line of 50 and 60% a long time ago, which can actually lead to an ecological disaster. but what i am telling you now, no one has ever explained to the farmers, no organized the appropriate work with them , moreover, the european union for all this, including the processes of decarbonization, the transition to organic farming, provided for payments, payments - these are provided for young farmers, even for female farmers, even for farmers, women, managers, where

appropriate subsidies are provided for each head... of livestock from goats to cows, sheep, including for each hectare of land, depending on the type of agriculture. i, when i look at all this, and i know very well that a ukrainian farmer, who does not receive a single penny of such money, long ago would have envied such help, which is provided by both the european union and the national ones. governments to the farmers of european countries, i am not talking about things related to individual tariffs, for electricity, special prices, for fuel for agriculture, mr. sergey, i apologize for taking up your time, but i just want everyone we understood that there was no fsb insider in these protests , because what they write and hang on these... rants has absolutely no meaning there is no relation to the real situation. thank

you, mr. roman, for the conversation, it was roman bezsmertny, politician, diplomat, former ambassador of ukraine to the republic of belarus. friends, we are working live on the tv channel , as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms, and at the same time there and there we are conducting a poll, we are asking you about whether russia is capable of provoking maidan 3 in ukraine. if you are on youtube, everything is quite simple, yes, no, or your answer option, write it below. ribom, and if you watch us on tv, pick up your smartphone and vote if you think that russia is capable of provoking maidan in ukraine 3 0800 211 381, no 0800 211 382, ​​all calls to these numbers are free, call at the end of the program we will sum up the results of this vote. next, we will be in touch with my colleague tetyana vysotska, who works in strasbourg. congratulations tatyana. union, and against the background

of what, of course, is happening now, many statements by the leaders of european countries, regarding whether they will send troops to ukraine or not, it is obviously about creating of the new european security architecture, maybe a little separate from nato, because the statements. i understand that many people in europe were frightened that at some point the united states of america would not stand up for the countries that are part of the north atlantic alliance. tell tetyana how this discussion was conducted today, and actually, what was agreed upon, or not agreed upon, but what are they agreeing on? yes, actually today's security debate in the session hall of the european parliament proved that the european union is now absolutely in emergency mode and absolutely serious is trying to the possible invasion of putin on the territory of the european union.

today, speaking in the session hall , the president of the european commission, ursela fondelaien, probably for the first time in my memory, so diplomatically but clearly stated: "war between the european union and russia is something possible." i will even quote her direct speech. she stated: "the threat of war is probably not imminent, but it is not impossible." the risks of war should not be exaggerated. but you have to be ready for them - said ursola fondelaien. and in connection with this, just this new one security architecture of the european union, the eu plans to build over the next five years. europe must wake up and urgently - ursula fondeyan emphasized and said that europe itself is already waking up, because this year the defense expenditures of the european union states are 20% higher than last year's expenditures. and also ursela fondelein announced. well, in the coming days, the european commission will submit proposals for the creation of the first ever

european strategy for the defense-industrial complex with a corresponding investment plan, and this strategy will be a priority joint long-term defense procurement, so that every year the european union becomes stronger and stronger, and also ursula fonberlaen confirmed the news that there will be a new position in the next composition of the european commission. european commissioner for defense. sergey tatiana, even today president zelensky spoke in tirana and met with the leadership of albania, but the forum was held there. of southern and eastern europe, the countries of southern and eastern europe, and zelensky commented on the words of macron, because everyone reads these words differently, or at least these words are narrated, it is clear that this was not an open statement of the french president, but simply in a discussion, he did not rule out, as they say, he did not rule out that. let's listen to what zelensky said in response to macron's statement. i was not at that summit,

he said that he will talk about ... certain new ideas on how to strengthen ukraine, and he said that he will share information with me when he arrives in ukraine, i think he is already in the media officially it said that he will be here inside this or, he will be here inside march, it is clear that you were obviously talking about this macron initiative as well as the military one. support for ukraine, what statements were made in the european parliament today regarding future or current military aid to ukraine, given that ukraine is in dire need of weapons and ammunition. yes, in fact, very good news came from the lips of ursula fondelaien this morning, which concerns ammunition in particular. ursola fondelaien

said that within the framework of the asap project, within the framework of which ukraine receives its own projectiles and ammunition from the european union , in the near future they are going to sign new contracts in order to bring the industrial capacity of the european union to 2 million shells per year by the end of 2025, that is, if ukraine was promised 1 million shells this year and most likely they will have time to provide them by the end year, then by the end of 2025 it is quite possible that ukraine will receive twice as much, this is very... this is cool news, because projectiles, especially 155 millimeter ones, are what ukraine needs very much, also another news about ukraine, that the office of defense innovations of the european union will be opened in kyiv, this is another step towards the integration of ukraine into the unified defense system of the european union, and there already european military will learn

the combat experience of ukraine, this is such interesting news, and the third is about the use of russian frozen funds, literally. .. for a second , i want to note that ursula fondeyan stated that a decision has already been made to use the income from these funds to purchase military equipment for ukraine, and she said that this is the best way the use of these russian funds, income from them. sergey tatyana, yulia navalny, the wife of oleksii navalny, also spoke at the european parliament today, how she was perceived there and in... actually, what happened there, but that's after we see, actually, what ms. navalny said in the european parliament. if you really want to defeat putin, you need to become innovators, you need to stop being afraid of it. it is impossible to harm him with another package of sanctions or

a resolution. it will be no different from what has already been done. he is not human morals or principles, it cannot be perceived that way. oleksiy realized this a long time ago. you are not dealing with a politician, but with a bloody monster. putin must answer for what he did to my country. putin must answer for what he did to a neighboring peaceful country, and putin must answer for everything he did to oleksii. how, tatiana perceives yulia navalna as the new opposition leader of russia in, well, on international platforms? absolutely, there was simply unprecedented attention to her today i will tell you that it is very rare that the press hall in the european parliament is completely filled, there is no place to sit, there are no free seats, the press box in the european parliament in the session hall was also completely filled during her speech and journalists were seated in box for visitors, because there were no seats,

and i will say that the european deputies were present in the hall, they constantly interrupted her speech... with deaf applause and at the end, everyone stood up, all the deputies present, that is, this already clearly signals that for them this person is it the next leader of the russian opposition, and after yulia navalnya's speech, a debate took place , during which the deputies discussed the future of the democratic russian opposition and the future of russia, and tomorrow the european parliament resolution will be voted on the basis of this debate, it is very interesting what will be included in it. because so far at the time of this inclusion , the final draft of the resolution has not been made public, but i have seen the draft of the largest political group of the european parliament, the european people's party. and there were three interesting ones in it theses, which i would really like to see in the final text. the first thesis is that putin is directly responsible for navalny's death. the second thesis is that the west

should not be afraid of the victory of ukraine over ukraine over putin, because it opens a window of opportunity for russia, its democratic transformations, as navalny dreamed of it. but the most important thesis of the project is from the european people's party. about which, unfortunately, there are many discussions, it is not known whether it will be included in the final document, but it is the thesis that the european the parliament calls on the european institutions to declare the so-called presidential elections in the russian federation illegitimate and putin the illegitimate president, but i immediately note that there are discussions about this, because not all deputies support it, they are afraid, and therefore i am not sure that this thesis will be included in the final text of the resolution, we will wait tomorrow. we will follow the amendments, the debates already during the voting, and i will report on it in one of the next broadcasts. thank you tetyana, it was tetyana vysutska from

strasbourg, our journalist who works at the session of the european parliament. friends, we are working live on the tv channel, as well as on our platforms in youtube and facebook, at the same time as the tv broadcast with broadcasts on our social platforms, voting is taking place. today we ask you about... is russia capable of provoking maidan 3 in ukraine, if you watch us on youtube, yes no, or your answer, please write in the comments under this video, if you vote with a mobile phone and watch our telecast, pick up your mobile phone and vote if you think russia is capable of provoking ukraine maidan 3 0800 211 381, no 0800 211 382, ​​all calls to these numbers are free, vote, we are interested to know your opinion. next, we will be in touch with valery romanenko, aviation expert, leading researcher of the state aviation museum. mr. valery, i congratulate you, thank you for being with us today. yes, thank you for

the invitation, good evening. good evening and good week, because even good 10 days, i would say so, because in 10 days the air force ukraine was shot down, or the defense forces of ukraine shot down 10 russian planes, and today the spokesman of the air force of ukraine, yuriy. this is how ignat commented on the success of the armed forces of ukraine in shooting down russian planes on espresso. luck in military affairs also has, well, it plays a serious role, because it is also necessary to be in the right place at the right time, but for that you need experience, skill, planning, operations, and so on, so everything that can be done by those small forces today, which are today in the air force, well, it is without of course, we really need... to thank those people, we really have few such tools capable of destroying russian aviation at long distances, but thanks to a combination of factors, actions, well

-planned work, and luck, we manage to achieve such results, i want to emphasize, that this is not the first time, there has already been such a series of downed planes, it was also in odesa, mykolaiv region, it was in the northern direction, when it was possible to land russian planes, of course , not everything is recognized by the enemy there, they are saying that we are a little over there somewhere, they say they were shot down there, they were not shot down there, well , as objective control shows, as we later see the obituaries in their pubs, then everything is confirmed later, mr. valery, apparently yuri ignat cannot say everything, you can say more, you are not the spokesman of the air force of the armed forces of ukraine, but what is the reason for such successes of the armed forces of ukraine in shooting down enemy planes, i.e. new opportunities, missile opportunities, or some other, well no, not only luck, right? well, yes, but so that we are pelted with anti-aircraft missile

complexes or additional missiles, i still that he did not hear this. for example, we were promised two sumpte complexes by the end of last year, but so far there has been no talk of using any of them, i have not heard a single such message, that is, so far... in fact, as mr. ignat says, we make do with our own modest resources , we are improving tactics, somewhere we are taking risks, somewhere we are taking serious risks with high-value complexes, but we also have to protect our front-line cities and front-line areas, so the risk in this case is justified, so it is not simple, simple like that excitement, yes, if you want to destroy, if you want to get it. and besides, i see that for now the number of russian planes is not decreasing,

so anyway we need new and new complexes, i hope that we will be able to strengthen our air defense at the expense, at the expense of although well, two or three more new patriots, and we should receive, according to the promises , new complexes, both short-medium and short- range, and still i am waiting for additional sumpte anti-missile complexes. mr. valery, what should be the losses of the russian aviation? in order for them to be irreversible, just for them , one hundred percent, well, that is, if there are how many planes they have there with 700 or how many planes, now i’m sorry, i definitely don’t know the statistics, but eh, well, a few hundred, i don’t know, 300 were shot down and there are probably more somewhere around 700 are flying, that is, it is necessary to destroy all of them in order for them to be irreversible, how can they quickly recover, well, that

means not those that fall, but those that are made? well, just today i received, i think, an edition of the james defense review, yes, something jumped out of my head, it clearly states, what is the number of planes, not quite exactly, but you can roughly say that the russians now have about 120 tsu-34s, which we shot down most actively of all the ones shot down, seven tsu-34s, yes, oh, but, well, they started the war having 140 such planes. but in the 22nd year they built another 10 and last year at least six more aircraft, so they compensate for these losses from time to time, but they cannot compensate for some losses, such as the su-25 attack aircraft, they are not subject to restoration, because the production this aircraft was stopped even in pre-soviet times, but even increased

the number of fighters, 35, compared to the beginning of the war, because we shot down no more than a dozen there, and the russians recovered more than one and a half dozen of such aircraft, that is, we, our air forces, still have work to do and work on destroying enemy aircraft, unfortunately , the sanctions are still very limited, they still only affect the most technological enemy weapons, for example, the fifth... generation fighters that the russians talked about su-57, yes, so the stealth fighters are new, so they are in 22- they built six of them that year, in 23 only two, this airplanes, well, on which western radio electronics are used the most, but such machines, which, let's say, are operational, there are fighters, ordinary fighter- bombers, the fourth generation, they

are still able to build. to restore and prepare the flight deck for them, but for sure , mr. valery, they will no longer be able to build a50, these planes, three planes that were disabled, two shot down, and one at the airfield in belarus, that is, these planes, i understand , there are not so many left, six or seven, and in principle, and in principle not in principle they are not they can already renew this big control panel. what kind of control center that flies and guides to targets, in principle they already have a limited number of these planes, if they even renew them, because now they have two planes at the factory and one, you correctly said, is under repair, maybe already out of repair even , yes, what is the situation , well, they restored it, well, they did, let’s say, all three planes, they restored it, yes, and how to use it, if they... start

using it closer than the last plane with flight number 42 was shot down, yes there near yesk, then they will again lose another plane, and if they take another 50-100 km there, then what will these planes see, they simply will not see anything, so here the fundamental question arises, will the russian air force need otaki flying radars, because if they... used to detect the situation about 300 km in our rear, yes, now they can see 10, well, if they take the patrol routes even further, they will be able to see 20-30 km as much as possible , and ordinary drones are eagles, yes, they can see a lot at the same distance.