thank you very much, well, let's not say goodbye to olya, literally in a moment i will hand you over to her safe hands, and this evening continues on espresso, be with us, goodbye, until monday, good evening, we are from ukraine, congratulations, i olga lenyut, today i will be in place of serhiy rudenko, temporarily. do not be afraid, and today we will talk about such things in the program. a powerful thrust of the occupiers at the time of yar, is a breakthrough of the ukrainian defense possible if the allies do not increase the supply of weapons and ammunition? help bypassing the congress. pentagon found for ukraine, 4 billion in the fund of presidential powers, what could be the consequences of delay. putin's personal crime. while

russia is saying goodbye to the murdered oppositionist navalny, the kremlin is threatening responsibility for unauthorized actions. well, until we started such a main conversation, i think the most striking event today is that in moscow on the first of march, the russian opposition politician oleksiy navalny was buried, he was tortured in a russian prison in the middle of february. thousands of people came to say goodbye to him, but to the church. only relatives and relatives, this official farewell lasted about 20 minutes there, the territory of the church was surrounded by medal fences, the queue of those willing to say goodbye to navalny stretched for more than a kilometer, let's see how it was.

i offer our traditional survey today, it is connected with the fact that yesterday the european parliament in its resolution expressed concern about the restrictions on the foreign trips of members of the verkhovna rada, primarily from the opposition, this can be considered as non-viberian restrictions on political activity elected people's deputies, in particular those who represent the opposition, this is what the document says verbatim, so we decided to ask you the following: should people's deputies be restricted from traveling abroad during... wartime, if your answer is yes, call 0800 211 381, if no, 0800 211 382 , ​​well, or on our website, as far as i understand, it can also be done somehow, and our first guest today is serhiy krivonos, reserve major general, former first deputy commander of the sso, from 2016 to 2019 and ex- deputy secretary the national security and defense council in... and with him, of course, we will start

discussing, first of all, issues related to the military sphere. i congratulate you, mr. serhiy. thank you for joining us. good evening, glory to ukraine. glory to heroes. well, i can't help but ask you, of course, first of all what concerns, well, your so direct, former field of activity, that is what actually happened precisely by the forces of the ssso. and... it became known that soldiers of the 73rd naval center of special operations, this is an official announcement. ensuring the departure of the main forces of the group after the completion of a special task, they accepted their last battle, forever remaining in the formation, so this was reported directly to the sso forces. according to the publication militarny, it is about the battle of the 28th

during the landing of the group on the occupied territory of the kherson region in the area of ​​tendrivska kosa, and there are many different opinions about this. various conversations, it is obvious that you are a person who is directly in the topic, and you have your own, for sure, view on this story, well at least perhaps you have some information on this matter, i wonder how you feel about what happened, can you tell us, well, to the extent that you can, what happened in general, a difficult question, and when you read official reports like this... i want to ask why you lie, why you lie and why you send people, because the task of executing the order of the command at the tender casino had no strategic,

operational, tactical meaning, and the trouble is that the special operations forces are controlled by those who unfortunately, which absolutely far from reality, starting from their service there they did not serve in...certain positions and just as they did not directly create them, that is why they treat their people well enough, you know, they do not take care of them, they are not their brothers, not their relatives, not close and not co-workers, so what we have is what we have, more than, say my brothers, probably we are unlikely to find out, although the russians are already blowing this situation up quickly enough and i will say that... the death was heroic , the question is why, why did we send them there, there was no need, i will repeat once again, unfortunately, it is broken, and i would really like to see a really tough investigation and those guilty of sending people just

for the sake of some kind of pr and photo shoot, bear severe responsibility, because with each such reference, the trust of the commanders, the trust under... to commanders may fall, and if there is no strict investigation, then the effectiveness of the use of special operations forces will not be what they were created for. and could it have been there, well , we have such a desire, as it is in the wells the bridgehead, which, well , let's just say, annoys the russians a lot, distracts certain forces, as far as i understand, could there be any expediency in that, to create another bridgehead in that area, as far as that is realistic. could be a task, you say that there is no sense, i understand your position, but i answered your question, i understand that you are completely far from military topics, look at the distance between our coast and the occupied coast, and i ask you the question of how you will ensure the logistics is simple

cash registers, just look at the map and you will understand that there is no point in keeping this cash register, and there is also the question of how the provision would be made. those people who would dig in there, what is all this for? the issue of pokrynak is completely different, there the width of the dnipro water barrier is much smaller than what needs to be done directly on these boats. well , actually, it was important for me to hear the explanation of why you consider it inappropriate. that's what it actually is. tell me now, well, actually, even if we talk about the 73rd naval special operations center. "as far as i know, this is not the first such tragic story that happened in the last two years, there were certainly other unsuccessful operations, and here the question arises, well, which is being discussed so much, you know, that maybe some kind of betrayal, maybe something else, maybe someone i gave it all there, well, i

'm just saying what is being said around, well , there is a lot of speculation around this, and here is the question, well, actually, who makes decisions about such operations, is it made at the level of the center itself?". of special operations, it is accepted at the level of the sso command, or it is accepted at the level of the general staff , that is, as a result, who is the answer, well , responsible, who nevertheless approves and plans these operations, a good question, but this question is precisely an element of certain limited information, therefore, with your permission , i will say that in this operations and what happened, the responsibility must be borne by the commanded units and... the command of the special operations forces, as for the cases you are talking about, i do not know in which circles you communicate, that yes, you know widely enough, failures and successes 73- th center, they happen in every war, but the failures that were in the previous 73rd center are also related to

the current leadership of the special operations forces, but they were a little bit in other positions then, but in the meantime they also planned certain operations in the kherson direction. well , let's talk about the situation in general then, well, now, for example, the head of the press service of the operational-strategic group of the khortets troops. today stated that the russian troops have accumulated significant slopes and for a powerful thrust at the time of the yar, at the same time , such a serious offensive is also underway and an attempt to advance further in the area of ​​avdiivka, attempts are being made to improve the tactical position, to advance in other areas. how would you describe the general situation happening at the front now? from your point of view, what is it? it? well, the limitations

of the ukrainian, well, the defense forces of ukraine, which cannot contain what is happening, the battles are going on at the tactical level, the russians are trying to advance in certain areas, they have an advantage in the number of artillery and the use of aviation means, namely, they actively use bomb control on application blows on ours. we strongly feel the lack, not the lack , let's say, of the required amount of artillery ammunition and trained, trained and trained people, and the question is not about the capabilities of the russian army, they have them, the question is about our ability to ensure timely detection with the help of our development of approaches the enemy to the front edge, their accumulation and striking at... accumulation, because in war it is always very important, when you have the opportunity to strike in

advance, then you disrupt any the enemy's efforts, as regards his offensive, are therefore difficult, difficult, i would like the issue of supplying ammunition and other samples, both quantitatively and qualitatively, to weapons to be resolved sooner, but i would not panic and, i would say that wouldn't be so pessimistic about... there are always times when things are difficult for you, war is never easy , sometimes it just all depends on how you are provided for your task? well, these sentiments are more likely to be spread through the media, i would she said, because, for example, here is the last message, which is also panic-stricken of this plan, bloomberg published that ukraine seems to see the risks of a defense breakthrough by the occupiers by the summer, if the allies collect the supplies of ammunition needed by kyiv, they they write as if they were gluttons in the ukrainian

leadership. how many such breakthroughs are there, really, how realistic is this prospect in general? the russians have the means to carry out such actions, i am more interested in the actions of our authorities to speed up the provision of the needs of the armed forces. let's let's remember that a week and a half later the president of the czech republic found 800,000 shells for ukraine , the whole of europe is looking for money, we have money, but for some reason we don't pay, if only to get any part of these 800,000, that's what the question is, i already i'm not talking about the complete failure of transferring the economy to functioning in the conditions of a special period, in accordance with the existing law on mobilization, i'm not... i'm saying that the leadership of ukraine is absolutely not engaged in the preparation of mobilization resources and in general

is not engaged in the fortification of resources equipment of the area in the required quantity and quality, that's what the question is, we are waiting for europe and the united states to do everything for us, and we are waiting directly when they will give us everything, let's ask the question not who will help us when, but what we ourselves can do to improve the situation. well , in general, it seems to me that you need to have a plan b in case, well , help does not come, and so that there is no such situation that help does not come and everything collapses, absolutely correct, i support you, and it is precisely necessary to calculate various options, in including the best and the worst to be, and this will give us the opportunity to be ready for it and not fall into the panic that i now see from many sources. of biomass information, well, panic is generally not the best reaction to any difficulties

, frankly speaking, the best reaction is to think that there should be a way out, but now in parallel with this it is clear that well under, let's say, more or less there is some actions of conversations regarding the supply of long-range weapons, well, regarding the supply of american long-range weapons, it is clear that everything there is strongly connected to financing that cannot be sealed. the us congress, but also, well, for example, the members of the bundestag voted to provide, well, the word taura is not specified, but long-range german weapons. and in response to this, we see schultz's statements, which are again about what if moscow is shelled, let's listen to this general statement of schultz's, because it is so, well, so, i would say, very characteristic of many in the west, who is talking about the fact that there is no need to give anything to ukraine. let's see. rocket

the hymars mount is not the most powerful or long-range weapon, but it can do more than. taurus, which flies at a distance of up to 500 km. in addition, if taurus is used incorrectly, it can achieve a specific goal somewhere in moscow. and let's discuss here one by one, well, first of all, about the fact that mars can be better than taurus and in general, well, where, well, are these things interchangeable, let mars and taurus. well the problem is that when civilians start telling others how to use military models of weapons it causes even a smile and surprise, it's firstly, secondly, well, we can't compare machines for passing difficult tracks and machines for passing high-speed tracks, they are completely

different purposes, as well as taurus and hymers, it's a little different in.. . in its ability to deliver certain blows, and it is important for us to have both hymars and tauros, and it will be very good for us, but why is our management absolutely not working to provide information support in germany itself, we spend a huge amount money for a telethon, which does not bring any benefit, but we do not have even 5 minutes on any german channel. television, where a ukrainian announcer in good ukrainian, in good german spoke about the realities of the war between russia and ukraine, talked about its torture of atrocities by the russians against ukrainians, then perhaps it would speed up and sharpen the problem of making decisions necessary for ukraine. well, i don't know, here you know, again, it's not quite so, because

it's precisely the pressure, including diplomatic, not only diplomatic, but also social. e media everyone caused the fact that , after all, the bundestag decided on the possibility of granting, that is, now we relied on it, well , perhaps in the position of chancellor ulav schulz personally, perhaps in some, well, group, well, let’s say this, of the leadership of germany, that is, in some a certain rather large process has been passed, because when the bundestag votes, it means that there is at least some certain majority of ee... which is ready to support the provision, and there is public support for this process also in germany, so here we are we have something quite so complicated, and it is connected, i think, with the second part of what schultz said, when the conversation is about the fact that they can hit moscow, but objectively, why do we need these taurus, well

, don't beat moscow, really, for something... else, then why do we need them, what should we talk about, why do we talk so much about them, about these taurus? well, if scholz only worries about moscow, thank god, the number of enterprises of the defense and industrial complex in the territory of the russian federation, which are not in moscow, is more than enough, so if he escalated the issue in moscow, then we can strike at other cities and factories of enterprises. of the russian federation and we absolutely do not violate anything about what the german leader requested. and finally , the last question for you. please tell me, from your point of view, in general, this whole story about the fact that somehow ukraine should announce its goals, well, that is, how, let's

put it this way, how could we remove this from our allies. fright that suddenly their long-range missiles will fly somewhere in the wrong place, this is the approval of the goals, this is perhaps some clearer indication, nevertheless, what would be our approach to the selection of goals on the territory of russia, how should we act to convince them? well, first of all, you don't need to agree on anything, you need to have weapons, strike, that 's the first thing, secondly, we only see such statements from scholz, regarding striking, another representative of... other countries, us will not limit the use of weapons, when our leaders say that everyone forbids us, this is not true, but we only we have heard officially from the germans, and from the americans and other... countries, we absolutely have not heard or seen such statements, neither written nor oral, so let's have and strike, let's have and

strike, just like that, well, thank you, serhiy kryvonus, reserve major general and former first deputy commander of the ssu, thank you for joining our broadcast, i remind you that we are conducting a poll on whether people's deputies should be restricted from working trips abroad during the war. if your answer is yes, call 0800 211 381 if your answer is no - 0800 211 382, ​​and we have a new guest, this is volodymyr tsybulko, a political analyst, writer, and let's go into more detail now, maybe we'll discuss what we were showing, which is navalny's funeral, i congratulate you, mr. volodymyr. congratulations, congratulations, glory to ukraine , to the heroes, glory, eh, so we saw these footage, we saw how this happened on the eve of all this, you know, well,

such an action, very strange, when for more than a week the mother of navalnoy did not release his body, telling about what she should do somehow it is very hidden that they are her there will be brought somewhere to a place in the cemetery, it will stand next to the grave, and there will never be another one. in general, a burial, and we saw what was happening now, but we did not actually see any such uprising there in particular, so what was the russian government so afraid of, and why were there all these preparations and all this frightened hiding of the body, from your point of view, vladimir, well, here in the russian government there is paranoia for... more than three of them not to gather, this is such an attitude of social behavior, only the authorities must collect more than three, and then

when mobilizing, lining up, uniforming and sending to ukraine, these are exactly the attitudes with which, in my opinion, the russian population somewhere internally even agreed, because apart from state measures, no oppositional actions. now there is no, and there is no sense in them , because uh, well, the opposition is when the opposition is part of the government and it only offers an alternative way, uh, here in russia it is completely different, putin does not hear, well, his entourage does not hear subordinates , does not hear the population, it thinks that it is doing for the population great good, and the fact that the population grumbles is not of interest to him, on the other hand, navalny’s entourage and this opposition, and such, well , isolated attempts to somehow, well, either fronde,

fronde, or demonstrate some disagreement with the actions of the authorities, hardly ever seep through , we remember the signatures for nadezhdin, and now this funeral, well, this is a very strange event, because in the morning... there was information that the funeral company, which was hired to serve this event, managed to find a shorter coffin for the coffin, shorter for the e- e navalny and there is something with a suit, that is, this everything was overgrown with such a permanent, absolutely petty, angry kind of moss, and created it... well, some absolutely unbearable situation, that is, people came, people said goodbye, but this

did not cause any harm to the authorities in any way, well, actually , because his supporters gathered there, they threw flowers there, and when this coffin was taken from the church to the cemetery, what this church will give there... on the outskirts, i'm not even talking about it, that's what it's called in that dream, here and there it would be necessary to remind, because in fact, as the image of navalny is promoted and inflated in the media, it has always been inflated, it has always been exaggerated, let's remember the story when navalny returned to russia after being poisoned, many expected that 1050 would meet him at the airport, there was no masquerading and it happened suddenly. that the authorities can wipe the face of what was menacingly called the largest opposition force in the russian federation, simply wipe the feet and that's it,

well... but when they came to lay flowers, well, when he just died, people went to some , well, such, it is not even possible to say memorials, because they were looking for some that were not even related to navalny, it is not at all known what they put flowers there with, but even during the laying of these flowers they were arrested, and now the ambassadors of the usa, germany, france came to the farewell ceremony there, well borys nadezhdin, who is positioned there as an anti-war candidate, but in principle , judging by everything, he is such a candidate sufficiently embedded in the elite, even if he is anti-war, but on the other hand, practically no one came from russian famous public figures, well, again after all, they were quiet enough, there were no riots, i don’t know, fights and anything like that, and here i wonder which

of these... this burial could have been concluded by the russian authorities, and even from the point of view of what russia is now, well, there are public politicians , or whatever, whatever they are called, some kind of circle, which is active in one way or another, well, all the years of putinism, the authorities worked to ensure that russian society was disjointed, encapsulated, and in the end we do not observe any civil. society, the last, well, such sprouts of civil society were dismantled after the swamp, some left the territory of russia, some went into business, some were demoralized, plus, well, because of the military mobilization, they cut off part of this, well, the electorate of the protest, the fronders, because

it only arose in... a storm of mobilization immediately, self-employed, itishniks, i.e. , a potential such specific environment from which the opposition could feed, it left russia. let's remember the anti-war rallies of the 14th year, how many people went to protests, maximum in moscow, about 50,000. this, this is probably all that the opposition could collect. because the opposition was not perceived as a structure or an environment that could really gain power , but they only started to demonstrate , i remember, there were such calls during the elections to shine a flashlight in the yards or there, well, this is, by the way, the anti-corruption fund, navalnytskyi , he was engaged in this, and plus navalny himself was always confused,

so to speak, in the testimony, because... he went to nazi rallies, to the so -called russian marches, which i want to remind rogozin, too marched, then he did not make a sandwich, crimea is not a sandwich, now, well, prison and his, well, this one can be said to be his post-war declaration that everything should be returned to ukraine and reparations should be paid, it too... well , it was perceived as an intellectual one, well, an intellectual exchange of opinions and nothing more, that is, this is what russian society did, none of this that navalny did was perceived as a real struggle for power, as a biting of power, that is, as political publicity and nothing more, well, but still

his, well, you can say. to become murder, therefore that when a person is first poisoned, then he constantly sits in a cell in a prison, then this is a murder as a result, no, he lost his health as a result of double poisoning, that it cannot be called that a person just died, and he died , no, it's great, absolutely, a person was brought to the world, how long he could live, no one knew, plus the mockery of the prison, which was arranged for him, that was it. silent murder, everyone perfectly understood that prison is a one-way street, well, symbolic for the russian authorities, it is symbolically important such thing, they just put everyone in a stall and that's all, and it's very noticeable, that 's what we actually saw, we're watching a very interesting story, which i think belarus was the first to go through, because we watched the legitimization of svitlana tykhanovskaya in the west

and now the wife . yulia navalny, she is ...