uh, the occupation authorities of donetsk and luhansk will turn to join russia, but this did not happen, and they simply turned to such a resolution, uh, as if how to help transnistria with some peacekeepers or something , because transnistria faced such challenges, threats, economic and social. in the humanitarian sphere, as they wrote, and the point is that earlier they were engaged in smuggling, transportation, whatever through the territory of moldova, but now it has simply stopped, and so they turned with something like this to the federation council, the state duma of the russian federation, and so on and the like, well, they expected that putin would say something about it in his address today, he didn't say anything. that

is, what probably should have happened did not happen, and it was also noticeable by the way russian propagandists behaved, because , you know, it was very obvious that they did not really understand, and what to do with this transnistria and in general, how could they get in there and interfere and do something bad there too? the ministry of foreign affairs already called the protection of residents' interests. transnistria is one of russia's priorities, and in my opinion, this is an important story. now the question arises. given that transnistria is on the one hand squeezed by the same moldova, which conducts an understandable policy, and on the other hand by the ukrainians, who conduct an even more understandable policy. then, well, actually, what are the options to respond to this appeal, while in reality our hands are tied on the dniester, we have to carry out an amphibious operation. to strengthen with

the help, so to speak, of transferring power through the air of the corridor, there is a corridor there from the side of the black sea, of course , the states are hostile to each other, but by air, as i understand it, on the territory of ukraine, but you will have to enter from the side of the black sea, you understand, but if we leave there 220 teas plus the contract, here is the map, this is geography, so there is no landing from the sea is impossible, these planes will be lost by petri systems. but all this is wonderful, they understand it, well , try to land from the sea, as they say, build forces, well, yes, they will simply kill them all somewhere, let them try, but the point is not that, the point is that in general this story with transnistria, it is a little bit different from the first year, as early as 2014, the russians periodically try to stir something up there, tell something about the fact that something will start to happen there. but you see

, it is not for some reason and it is obvious that they were waiting for something more, they were really waiting for some statements that could, well, in some way could destabilize moldova as a whole, the authorities of moldova, and for sure they will continue to do it, moreover, there are more and more such conversations about what it should be the creation of a slightly non-terrorist group on the territory of transnistria. because otherwise what follows next cannot be interpreted in principle, listen to the iranian example, sorry, we have already complicated it so much, in my opinion, that iran is already giving us exactly, if not 100, then 10 points ahead, they do not feel at all problems, finance to open hisbal and move part kasir, the corps of the country of the islamic revolution on the needed theorka answer to my question proxy yes. well, what does proxy mean,

it means to create, well, essentially a terrorist group, but before that they agreed there on their tv broadcasts, well , and secondly, what should the proxies do, the most obvious purpose of the creation of these terrorist groups in transnistria, which russian propagandists call for, is apparently subversion warehouses of weapons in sausage shops, it is absolutely obvious that these warehouses , well... can't really be used for any purpose there, they tried to do this since the 14th year, to somehow transfer them to russia, or even before that, but in principle there it simply cannot be used , apparently, but to blow it up , and in fact, this is also discussed very widely on russian airwaves, but if something explodes in the sausage shop, and as for the sausage shop, if there is an explosion there, so that nothing is left

... it's a pity for the people living in transnistria, if we have to fight with the whole of nato here, and somehow capture ukraine, that transnistria is already possible , the russians are just ready, i think, to just demolish it, even if everything there explodes, and at the same time, of course, russian propagandists will tell that they are being provoked, and these conversations, as it turns out, are being provoked, this is also a separate beautiful story, because , well, they could capture, that is, pass the territory... cover the territory of ukraine and calmly pass to transnistria, but they are being provoked, they are not being allowed to safely reach transnistria, this is such a terrible provocation from the whole world. we are separated from transnistria by a very wide strip, in order

to help transnistria, we still need to take mykolaiv, ochakiv, kherson, they can organize a dangerous provocation against our armed forces. go from the other side and go from transnistria and liberate odesa, ochakiv, mykolaiv. and for this they involve romania, so that at this very moment the romanian ending is for a blow in the back, then it is transnistria from the side, that's why they need romania, that's why anti-russian sentiments are maintained in romania, itself... you don't like moldova dangerous, but in tandem with romania, moldova becomes very dangerous, and how can i know, if i am still very worried about the russophobia that has engulfed bulgaria and bulgarian circles, well, you are right understood, in russia they are considering how to capture

transnistria as well, but do not confuse russophobia in romania and bulgaria, because they do not allow it to be done, it turns out. well , of course, the conclusion of all this is that for now, since there is no way out, there is still no idea how to capture transnistria, then this is all some kind of bluff, which probably also provoked a cunning measure. in general, everything that is currently spreading around transnistria is a bluff. yes, indeed, if ukraine now enters transnistria, then our diplomats, and why you accuse us, viiso, ukraine of its truth and what, you were interested, satisfied... we are just like those who are on our side of history, politicians, countries, international forces who do not want to enter into a conflict with russia, but are forced to, because look, this is a violation, they will say, that's how it will be, that's a violation, you know, we don't want to conflict with russia anymore, we will trade with them, bluff's

task is very simple, suddenly russia will react and really start something about it react, withdraw the troops, let's go to defend transnistria, transnistria must be in... will become part of russia, necessarily. now , in fact, everything depends on the decision that the transnistrian authorities themselves make. here, if they, as they wanted, follow the donetsk option, that is, announce the inclusion of russia and officially address vladimir vladimirovich putin, admit it, then the situation will go according to the worst scenario, it is absolutely clear, if this issue does not arise today, if shawna can hold him, everything will be more or less normal. well, that is, some russian puppets, in principle , it turns out, everything depends on them, but for some reason, i say, they are all provoking, provoking, provoking russia again, now transnistria, well, these delusions are so constant, and another such provocation, which is

also now being told that everyone is again provoking russia to use nuclear weapons weapons, in fact, this is again a topic that got out, sharply, the number increased. talks about nuclear weapons on russian television, well, let's say, it didn't happen for several months, moreover, it didn't happen after somehow yes, something there after another nuclear escalation putin came out once again and said that no, let's not go now, now is the time again, because all the solovyovs got out again, they are all talking about radioactive waste and again telling where, where and how they should strike with nuclear weapons bombs, i don't know why. i don't know why, time after time we let them escalate the situation, i don't know , the thoughts creep in that surely we shouldn't know this, that there is some bourgeois secret that has been shared with our leadership and we

can't afford it, because in there are a contract with the martians, and we do not give in to provocations, but it is possible to give in to provocations once in a while, how to give in spades? so here's what i think about it, once we have to go over these four steps. who do you dislike the most, the british, of course , then poseidon, well, let's hit britain with nuclear weapons again, and again, you know, talks about what if, and what will happen if russia takes over the baltic states, well, no one will strike with nuclear weapons, they will not strike with nuclear weapons, again this is all in russian television in full growth. such an interesting worldview question, here we took these three baltic republics, and nato will go

to fight and die for them, when we will destroy them with a nuclear strike, what difference does it make, where the cloud will go, you over paris will screw it up, we are nearby, where are you nearby, russia nearby, we border, with whom you border, with paris you border, well, you say about the baltic region, why the baltic region, we will take the baltic region, well, in short. it happened again, choose paris or london to strike first, and why did it escalate, well, i'll tell you, the official is explanation, because it is macron who said something about the possibility of attracting some nato troops to ukraine, so that they would do something here, eh, well, it’s interesting, you know, an opinion in itself, but that’s not really the point, let’s put it this way , that's not the point, but they are talking about it, that is, literally... putin's message to the federal assembly and there, well,

after a very long break, there were literally again direct threats of nuclear weapons and stories about the fact that we are keeping a list of them there , what are these types of weapons, well, that is, everything is rolled out, what again i say, they haven't rolled out all these conversations for a long time, but literally listen. another rubicon will be crossed, french president emmanuel macron admitted that nato troops could be sent to ukraine, prevent russia from winning the war in ukraine, that is, what we would have considered science fiction a few weeks ago is now a reality, the prime minister of slovakia fitsoch utoch. several countries of the north atlantic alliance are considering the possibility of sending troops to ukraine,

the matter really smells like the third world, let's go full-scale war, he remembered that he the only nuclear state in the european union, without question, that is, here you understand, the saying, or somehow it sounds differently in different shades, played, to hear paris die, let them hear it somewhere at the fair, that everyone will die. a statement that can lead to nuclear armageddon, if you call a spade a spade, on the other hand, the consequences are such that we have here, probably, obviously, a war with moscow, with putin, with the europeans, if it suddenly happens, no one big will come, well... well, these were propagandists, and here is putin, well

, that is, let's say, they were at the warm-up in putin, objectively speaking, because this whole outcry lasted for three days, but on thursday, putin finally spoke. the strategic nuclear forces are in full readiness for guaranteed use, without any embarrassment they claim that russia allegedly intends to attack europe, but... it’s just that you and i understand that this is not just some amount of bp, and at the same time, for the tasks of strikes on our territory choose the most effective, as they think, means of defeat, they began to talk about the possibility of sending it to ukraine military contingents of nato, but we remember the fate of those who once directed their troops on the territory. of our country, but now the tragedy for potential interventions

will be much sadder, possible interventions will be much more tragic, they must eventually understand that we also have weapons, yes they know, but this is about what i just said, there are also weapons that can hit targets in their territory. well, that is, before it was definitely not heard in such a case that you are saying something about some troops on the territory ukraine, yes, and we will suddenly strike, like these people... solovyov would say in paris, well , that's exactly how it goes, that's how the narrative goes that if something appears on the territory of ukraine, then russia has the right to strike around paris or london, and this is probably a new turn, i would say, because it did not come to this before, moreover,

it is impossible to say that this is such a logical turn, because, well, actually, ukraine. country, on its territory there can be anything that ukraine considers necessary, including troops other countries, if we so decide, our parliament will vote so, our president will so decide, and there will be such support from the population, then we can have any troops here that we want, so, to put it mildly, it does not play, and in principle, well, i would say that somewhere russian propaganda has understood itself in this regard. that they overdid something a little bit with these conversations and started to crawl away ever so slightly. this is an interesting legal case study, because if they attack ukraine, it will be with national armies, not the nato alliance. it decisions of national governments. and if we

answer, oh, god forbid, it's true, it's scary to imagine a world war if we do. the response in paris is already an attack on nato. well, yes, that is, it will be an attack on nato, and in principle it will be an unprovoked, frankly speaking, attack on nato. and this, let's put it this way, a problem also arose, like with transnistria, that is, they wanted to arrange something in transnistria, but then they found out, remembered that, in principle, how to fight, like there, there troops, it turns out, cannot be proved, here the situation is different, you see threatened to... chewed for a whole week that macron said something, and now we have the right to strike somewhere, here it turns out that it will be an unprovoked aggression towards nato, well, one could say here that that's all, but not everything, you understand, the fact is that macron's words, whatever they were, were not really the reason for these talks about

a nuclear attack, about all these weapons and all that, the escalation actually happened. much earlier, and it happened 10 days ago, in fact, at the moment when in the western hemisphere began to throw out some very strange articles about the fact that russia is going to place nuclear weapons in space, there they reacted to it in principle, well, somehow, so did western politicians, blinken managed to say something about this, but here... the most the russians actually reacted to this again , there was such an interesting story when suddenly the entire conversation between shaigu and putin was recorded, where shaigu and putin are sitting and what all these publications were for, we do not place anything in space and are not going to, but probably it's all

for a reason, well, i hope, maybe we can to show it to you, or maybe not, let's see now, but here... the fact is that all these conversations, they were long before that, when some kind of statement by macron appeared there, moreover, immediately after, parallel to this conversation and all these screams on the state russian television about the use of nuclear weapons intensified, they already said so, and yes , that they can hit somewhere there, and all these, well, such and such and such things, they have been going on for three years, literally, the last ones. weeks, and therefore, i think that it is necessary to connect them somehow there, this, this, you know, this is not a spontaneous reaction to statements or articles somewhere out there in the western press, and this is not a spontaneous reaction to the statement of the same macron, moreover, it is possible that these same articles were once again posted by russia, or somehow with their assistance , or someone somewhere, well

, organized some kind of leak, after all, judging by everything, the reason is something... a little different, the reason is that with all this talk about nuclear weapons, russia is trying to warn about something else, even if to pay attention, very carefully, that in the first place putin mentions when talking about macron's statement, he mentions not deploying any troops, no, he mentions the provision of long-range weapons, and this is most likely the main reason of all. statements and brandishing of this nuclear baton, which happened again now. there is an impression that we are now at such, you know, very turning points, which are connected with the fact that, in principle, well... a lot of people, both the military and western politicians, understand that fighting is based on the principle that russia is living its life, and ukraine is bleeding, well, it's

just killing ukraine, frankly, and it's different you won't name, that is, they have, if there is a war, and russia uses all the weapons it has, well , then ukraine should get the opportunity to use everything possible. existing weapons provided to it by its partners and to use them where it considers it necessary, that is, now in principle there are discussions about the possibility of using those weapons that we did not use on the territory of russia, to use them nevertheless on the territory of russia, moreover, there are talks about this weapon being somewhat much stronger, well, you've probably heard talk about giving taurus and there are all these, you know, doubts about not giving taurus, atakamsy. and so on, and it is absolutely no coincidence that russia is making such efforts to influence trump there, to influence his people in

the republican party in order to delay the provision of funding to ukraine as much as possible, because again it is clear that this funding will come, and for it will be purchased not just the shells that are on the battlefield, but many more weapons will be purchased for it. more powerful, which will again act much more powerfully and with a completely different one the philosophy of its application, and at this , you know, turning point for russia, it is important to stop this process, because it is brewing, such a turning point is brewing in how to understand aid to ukraine in general, or to prevent ukraine from losing, yes, as they did before they told me, after all... to give up and win in russia, these are different stories, and in order to prevent the formation of these thoughts that in the end

ukraine should win, and not just not lose, now russia is rocking this whole story with a nuclear weapons, even listen to how these two, you know, shoigu and putin these two old worlds are sitting around and think that they are very... cunningly invented everything, but they talked somewhere about weapons in space, and now they will tell everyone that let 's talk now about strategic stability, because you understand, so that we don't use nuclear weapons somewhere, don't go out, don't take them into space, well, that means we have to agree, sit down, agree on what to agree on, agree on only one thing, about surrendering ukraine in essence, and all the fathers conversations, they... themselves before that, listen, just look at these spades, and it is directly read on these spades. the question is about the noise that has been raised recently in the west, in particular

something like, and the placement of nuclear weapons in space, now for some reason in the west this topic is being raised again, and at a fairly high emotional level, as you explain it, we do not have that , they know that we don't have it... but nevertheless they make a fuss, the surprise is different, everyone knows that we have it, it was said in 2018, in a message to the federal assembly, in fact for the whole century, they they know what we have a fairly high stage of completion of work both on poseidon and on peresvet and on petrel, work on sarmatian and vanguard is completed, two regiments are already almost fully armed... situations, of course, you can add a few more to this, for some reason they don’t talk about it, and this is really something to be afraid of. the reason the galas were raised is

the situation they would like, renewing and encouraging us to be such a clumsy stability. yes, i agree, as far as space is concerned, in space we only do what is necessary. what is in other countries including the united states, and of course, you are right , they know about it, but as far as negotiations are concerned, we have never been against negotiations, well, such, that is, such, you know, the invitation of the west to the negotiations, well, actually at the cost of ukraine, i will not say that i know how it will end. this blackmail, i don't know how it ends, i just record that it is happening now, and this is now a really turning point that is happening, it is not the first time that they are trying to use this as a certain ... i

would say, such is the immunity of western politicians to this, you know, threats that we also have such nuclear weapons, safkaya nuclear weapons, well, there is this certain immunity of western politicians to these threats, but to what extent this immunity is enough to understand that it is simply necessary to ignore it, i do not know, but i am absolutely sure i know that it will not be limited to threats, to try to destabilize the situation in various parts of the world, transnistria, not transnistria, but somewhere else, and literally , this destabilization is what russian propaganda constantly talks about and that essentially now is the main such strategic the direction of russian propaganda, to shake up the situation wherever possible, as possible, so that, well, now let's sit down and

agree on the whole. with this question at the expense of ukraine, well, here it is, and here is what the russian propagandists say, believe me, in fact, it is no different from what putin and shoyu say there, it is simply said in other words, see what happens next, serhiy , then the big war, well, actually we are going to that, joyfully as if we have finally reached the main topic of conversation, let's just say , well, in general, everything that is developing in the world... of course, this is about all humanity, this whole world is heading for a great war, where will it break and at what point, that's the question, it could be sausage, it could be taiwan, it could be lebanon, it could be an exchange of nuclear strikes between israel and iran, it could be anything, and you know, it's not humanity heading for nuclear war, it's russia and china pulling the world toward nuclear war, and the only way

to actually stop it is to... give russia the piss, because this will stop such an uncontrollable desire to arrange something, knowing that that they will give a pee, well somehow china won't particularly do this, especially russia won't do this, this is important to understand, well, how much this understanding will be enough, i can't say about this yet, well, we'll see. there are 15% discounts on maridoza in psaryznyk, vam and uschad pharmacies, there are 15% discounts on otrivin spray in psaryznyk, ban and uschad pharmacies. rose b, rose b. professional hair care at home. rose b, buy plantain from pharmacies, you and save. there are discounts on

vitamin d3, d3. 10% in pharmacies plantain bam and savings there are discounts on lisobact 10% in pharmacies plantain bam and savings exclusively on the air of our channel, welcome friends on the air politclub on the espresso tv channel, the most relevant topics of the week. russia's war. against ukraine, the war in the middle east, the crisis on the border between ukraine and poland. topics that resonate in our society. drone attack on kyiv and other cities of ukraine, drone attacks on moscow and other russian cities. analysis of the processes that change the country and each of us. the country should get the right to start negotiations on joining the eu.

vitaly portnikov and guests of the project. to us boring, because there is nothing to fight about, let's invent, help to understand the present and predict the future, for the world the second trump presidency will be terrible. project for those who care and think politclub. every sunday at 20:10 at espresso. the premium sponsor of the national team represents. united by football together are stronger. greetings, this is svoboda live on radio svoboda. we have already come to the snake itself. the following shots may shock you. news from the scene. live kamikaze drone attacks. political analytics. objectively and meaningfully. there is none none