i brought one simple main message today, when it comes to the large and medium -sized countries of the european union, poland is the only country that says one hundred percent: yes, we need to open the european union to ukraine, so we need to start negotiations quickly, so it is beneficial for the european union, for our security, both for ukraine and for poland. i said that, of course, every time there is an enlargement of the european union. certain sectors

of the economy lose, then we must take care of them, that is, we must take care of farmers, we have to take care of the producers so that they have time to adapt to the new conditions, and that's how it will be, that's how it was with every enlargement of the european union, but i also talked a lot about the polish economy in these times, that is, i said that the polish producers are a lot are sold in ukraine, that we should help polish companies in ukraine that work here, invest here, produce here. 3,600 polish companies operate, and that is also important, but i spoke about these issues mainly to a polish audience, so that to show that polish-ukrainian relations are actually good relations, and if there are good and intense relations anywhere, then it is with us, because relations should be good, but not intense, in the polish-ukrainian partnership - these are good and intense relations, in in such a situation, there will always be some problem that needs to be solved later, but it should not destroy the whole picture. i have the impression that after two

weeks of such sharp statements, harsh messages from both sides, things have calmed down a little, that everyone is beginning to understand that you can't make a scandal around every issue, you just have to solve the difficulties. this week, namely on friday, march 1 , polish farmers started an action on the border with lithuania. the reason is that agricultural products are imported into the eu from ukraine. lithuanian politicians also came to the border, and during the day... the grain carousel is aimed at discouraging ukraine and poland. what can you say about this? first of all, i can say, and i said it at the conference today in kyiv, that is, let's start with ourselves and comment on things with reason, because sometimes a lot of bad things come out of overly emotional comments in poland or ukraine or somewhere else, and secondly, let's be careful with russian propaganda. it

really plays a big role here, it is not only about quarreling poland and ukraine, but about weakening, for example, ukraine's position in the european union and discord between poland, lithuania and ukraine. in central europe, there will be many such operations that provoke disagreement, but in fact we can resist this if we rationally comment on the situation. today in polish the market receives little ukrainian grain, because the main problem today is no longer ukrainian grain. today. the problem is that there is a large export to the european union from the countries of south america, and even today there is a problem that russian grain enters through the back door. prime minister donald tusk spoke about this yesterday. in fact, russian grain itself does not enter through poland, more precisely, only a small amount of this grain enters through poland, as far as i remember, about 10 thousand tons, although this amount, in fact, it should not reach us, but the problem is that it enters other countries of the european union, which means that first of all you need to turn on your head and... see what

the essence of the problem is, the grain market and the agricultural market in the eu in general are definitely one of the most regulated, what does that mean? that means it's very difficult to keep the price low, so if someone is in the eu they have to adhere to very strict standards, for example on plant protection products, so well, their grain is bound to be more expensive because of that, and it is more difficult for these manufacturers, and in this case they need help, but what i told the ukrainians, i told them: dear, you will have the same problem. because i want you to be in the eu, i personally work for it, so in a few years, maybe 5-10, when you are fully in the eu, your farmers will protest against grain from kazakhstan, for example, or against grain from brazil , this is also part of the reality of being in the eu, the existence of farmers' protests, but they cannot block the border and everyone already knows that donald tusk's decisions are unambiguous. tusk talks about the inclusion of certain roads, speaking directly of roads, circles, places connected with the border to... critical infrastructure and

preventing protests there, but in general there will be protests, today we will solve these issues, then there will be other matters and in the end ukraine will decide will enter the eu, and everyone will benefit from this. ukrainians, employers, but also hired workers and farmers, because some farmers, for example, will switch to processing and selling finished products. this mechanism is obvious, but now it does not look the best, you just need to unload it and to ensure that this mechanism is not used by russian propaganda. let's talk about what polish prime minister donald tusk said this week. ukraine and poland are discussing the temporary closure of the border and the suspension of trade, the pole said.

if you are at least slightly interested in the comments of politicians and experts, then you should pay attention to the words of the deputy minister of economy of ukraine taras kachka, who for many years, i think, deep down was a politician who advocates polish-ukrainian dialogue, but recently he was known as such a communication ostrich, especially on twitter and facebook, so he wrote that tusk was simply misunderstood, i read it and told our colleagues in ukraine today that if even taras kach'. everyone understood what donald tusk said. tusk says: i am the prime minister. and here he says that as the prime minister he obviously represents different interests. he must take care of manufacturers, but he must also take care of jobs at enterprises that export products to ukraine. and i will also remind you about these 3,600

polish companies operating in ukraine. so the prime minister of the government always has such a problem to reconcile all these needs. but let's not belabor the obvious. to something extraordinary, this is obvious in the case of any power. government exists to reconcile the interests of different groups. and in the case of donald tusk, today it is, for example, these groups. if you read donald tusk's statement carefully, there will be no doubt. again, if taras kachka defends it, defends tusk and says: "you are not after reading what tusk said, this is enough, believe me, because the message was really clear. prime minister of poland, tusk is obliged to protect different environments, different groups. and what does the situation with trade with ukraine look like on the part of poland? you are talking about 3,600 companies that work in ukraine, but there are also companies that simply trade with us, what

role do they play in your economy, how important is this trade for the economy of poland. i have been talking about this for several weeks in various venues, firstly, precisely today in kyiv i... realized that our program fulfills an important role of explaining poland to ukraine, and ukraine to poland. this is very good, because there is probably no other place where you can talk about it in such detail. i myself wanted to initiate that we finally talk about the fact that this issue is much more complicated, because it looks like this: there are producers of grain, corn, corn, who find out that the european market for ukrainian products is open, and we are in trouble, because my family, for example, thinks such a manufacturer, my family planned such and such income. this year we sowed corn, we already know that there will be good harvests, but at the same time the price is lower, we can't cope, well, we need to help them, but isn't helping farmers something new in the european union? no, this has always been the case since the existence of the eu, and even earlier there were such problems in the european

economic community, and money was always allocated to save this industry. first, then we have those who specifically sell products, they can buy cheaper raw materials, again, grain, for example, make ... waffles, and then sell those waffles in ukraine. in this way, jobs will appear in poland, and these numbers are growing at a record level. polish exports to ukraine already amount to more than 11 billion euros, while some people say that these are mainly defense exports. no, these are not defense products, they are mainly food products, these are various types of products that are mainly transported by roads, namely by road and rail. the cost of transporting one truck has already increased due to the border blockade. the polish side, although also due to the fact that earlier cars that returned to poland was empty, they were delayed longer on the ukrainian side, be that as it may, but now for the owner who transports certain goods by truck, before the cost was on average 1800 €, now it can be 5.6 thousand euros for one transportation. let

's think about how it reduces polish costs, how it reduces our profits? later, such an owner will have to fire someone to complicate the picture by adding that... there are polish companies operating in ukraine, which, for example, provide insurance services. 13th largest in terms of size, the bank in ukraine is polish, this bank is owned by poland, as i said, there are about 3,600 such enterprises. including very large and important ones, so it is key for us that in the end, on both sides of the border, everyone thinks that it is beneficial for us, that it is beneficial for us to cooperate, because if we spoil the atmosphere in business, we know that it can affect it terrible impact, i'm not talking about any boycotts here, i'm just saying that for example today i met with a group of polish businessmen and they say it hurts us too, it means we just have to learn to live with the fact that ukraine is joining the eu, that the market is opening up, that sometimes... those groups that suffer losses, but

protests, we will extinguish them and help them in general, let's get used to the idea that it is beneficial for everyone, because in the end it will turn out that the dutch will benefit from the open ukrainian market, the germans will benefit, the french and the spanish will benefit, and the poles will forget to take advantage of it, because we will endlessly argue about corn and wheat. another important question: this week she worked on the polish-belarusian border a team of journalists. what to do with this fact and whether the blockades of polish farmers are really in the place where they should be, maybe together with the ukrainians it makes sense to fight against russian grain and other agricultural products in the eu. as for poland, we really don't have much of this russian grain, as i already said. so i don't know what they saw, it needs to be carefully checked, the first to spread propaganda around it. there are clear data,

in particular the day before yesterday, i met with the head of the polish grain chamber, an institution that deals with and unites grain producers, i i know for sure that minimal volumes of russian grain go to poland, but it goes to other eu countries. that's right, because, for example, ukrainian grain does not go to poland at all, but you yourself say that it goes to the eu, which is a single market, and therefore a single market. exactly, that's why we need to act at the eu level now, and which country supports sanctions the most? poland? this is not a problem for us. donald tusk took the initiative. this is not a problem. we can try to extend the sanctions. it is clear why the sanctions do not apply to grain. language then it was about unblocking ukrainian grain. this was one of the conditions of the russians, the easing of sanctions. accordingly, negotiations were held against this background so that everyone understood the process. poland was and is in favor of sanctions, but...

background history, because it was part of the negotiation process regarding the unblocking of ukrainian grain in the ports, so i know that not everything can be said at a rally, just as not everything can be expressed in the parliament in one minute , but our program is designed to shed some light on these phenomena regarding poland, so we are ready to initiate without any problems. it is important that ukraine and poland fought together against this hybrid operation, as lithuanian prime minister indride šemoni said about the blockade. i'm just afraid we're going to spend the whole program discussing grain again. it's good, because no one is discussing it in such detail, but now, i think, i came to ukraine and my first impression is that really the main issue is to provide ukraine with ammunition, because without it it will be very bad. "if serious people start talking to me, you know, there is a risk that the russians will break through

the front line, there is a risk that they will go further, that ammunition is really lacking in some areas of the front, again ammunition is produced domestically and wherever possible, these are serious things, i also wanted to talk about this today, i spoke with my ukrainian friends in various meetings so that we do not miss it . well, let 's talk about it this week, chancellor." how do you explain this position of olaf scholz and how to perceive it when all week the german media is printing various scenarios that could occur after russia invades the european union. my proposal is to understand him, but not to agree with him and... push him to the right decision again, he says so because he is afraid, in addition, he is afraid of

a scenario from which russia will win at the front. i would say to chancellor scholz, yes, mr. chancellor , we need to act on several points at the same time, provide ukraine with ammunition, provide weapons of the best generation, i.e. taurus, give the ukrainians the opportunity to attack points inside russia, i am talking about strategic points, for example, production plants weapons because it is logical if we... can't produce as much ammunition as the russians do and supply it to the ukrainians, so let's let the ukrainians at least destroy the factories that work to kill their countrymen, logically, there is nothing extraordinary about this, i think we just have to admit, that scholz has not yet changed his mind and ask the federal chancellor to approach the topic differently next time, and this is also related to what i openly spoke about today in ukraine, i mean, i said, listen, today the polish team, prem prime minister donald tusk, the minister of foreign affairs, radoslav sikorsky and other ministers and deputies,

travel around europe and talk only about ukraine, only about ammunition, when they hear that they are constantly criticized, when... the problems with agriculture are exaggerated, even psychologically we we just don't get enough incentive to act, it's important for us today, and that 's the most important thing, we have to make sure that the west takes seriously this war situation on the front, so that the front does not break through, and there are several things that need to be done at the same time: ammunition plus weapons of a new generation that can hit strategic points, points on the russian side, the president. to exclude in the context of the sending of western countries in paris, he stated that it is not possible for countries to send troops to ukraine. nato secretary general jen stoltenberg currently states that the alliance does not plan to send troops to ukraine. at the same time , estonia and the netherlands stated that they are ready to consider the possibility of sending their troops to

fight against the russian federation in the future. what do you think about these words of macron, which of course were received from enthusiasm in ukraine, but are quite new to the rhetoric behind... how important is it, what is the point, and what's next? i don't know exactly what president macron meant, what he wanted to achieve , but i do know, i would also like to say this to the ukrainians and the poles: today we really need to ensure the delivery of ammunition, we can think about what we will do in a year or two, and to make a political fuss about it, but i am a realist, today there will be no sending of troops, today no one takes it seriously, i glad everyone is so happy that the president of france said something. but i have this advice: let's look at the statistics, how much money france gives in connection with this war, germany gives much more, so if anything, it is better to look at germany, poland, the usa, canada, and tell the french to give more ammunition now, there is no point in thinking about what will happen in 2-3 years, this is how it looks , because it may not be there anymore, for god’s sake, what is there to defend if the russians, say, go

100 km deep, i would say, let’s go we will realists, now, it is necessary to perform, you know what. and we also demand this from france. vladimir putin's speech before the federal assembly, which his advisers had been preparing for weeks before the elections in russia, which will take place on march 17, had to be changed after macron's words. they say that the speech was rewritten literally on the knee, because putin had to react. he referred to ukraine as his territory and threatened a nuclear apocalypse in the event of sending troops from other countries to ukraine. accepted at the event, and what to expect from putin after a new spill elections? this performance did not introduce anything new into my consciousness. i'm not excited about it and in any case i expect the worst. however, one of the leading politicians in poland, the speaker of the diet, said that putin should be trampled into the ground and dealt with very harshly. i believe that today we should treat putin like hitler in 1937

or 1939 and just expect the worst from him, there is no point in analyzing his every speech in detail. and it is known that there is a risk that he will strike later. our task is to counteract this, not a single new speech of his will bring nothing new, there will be no peace in europe with putin. however, in the writings of the ideologues of the kremlin regime, the program of this neo-totalitarian machine is authored by dugin ilyin.

ensure that ukraine receives an invitation to join nato in july. this is a very difficult task, it is not known whether we will succeed, but we can mobilize. this is our goal, and first of all, to provide ukraine with weapons and ammunition. these days are quite simple, because

it is about the security and salvation of ukraine, and therefore about saving the western world from war, because putin wants war, we must to protect against war, we must keep the peace, keeping the peace means effectively containing putin. hungary should not have any idea about orbán's politics, and it is bad that some in ukraine even use this hungarian argument. it's great that you ask me about

this, i'm very glad about it, i really wanted to comment on it, and i still haven't had the opportunity, because hungary has been hurting ukraine at every step and everywhere for several years now. they are an effective ally of the kremlin on all issues, well, it might be better for our ukrainians friends waited for us to resolve the border issue, instead of comparing. speaker of the us house of representatives, republican mike johnson, said this week that a bill on additional funding for ukraine will be considered as soon as the federal government funding issue is resolved. this means that again nothing is clear, there are no clear deadlines and everything is pushed somewhere. johnson is actually on track to go down in history as the one who finally provoked putin. new punch, indeed mike johnson is very close to being written about in the stories so that his children and grandchildren will read that he provoked putin to take further steps,

because this is what it ultimately leads to, this bargaining of some politicians for the happiness of some, because i would also like to speak to the defense of many republican politicians in the united states, which understands the situation and is united, but the group of politicians holding them back, is really starting to play with the security of central europe. always ends the same for america. at first it seems that this is a cheaper solution, in the end america pays for it everything is much more expensive. this has happened more than once in the 20th and 21st centuries, and i am truly at a loss for words. so what to expect and what is the situation with american political leadership this spring? what's next with help? everything looks good, because america has a smart president and smart politicians, in the democratic camp, mostly in the republican one. i am convinced that most of them are only behaving like this now because the election campaign is going on, if it were not for america, if it were not for the last two years of america, central europe would be on fire, this

to the credit of president biden that he has created such a large anti-putin coalition, it is his personal result, but also the establishment of american politicians from both parties, because i do have contacts with both, and see how much wisdom and experience and conviction they have that you need...

15% in psarynky vam and ochadnik pharmacies, there are discounts on parafast 10% in psarynky bam and ochadnik pharmacies. damn, stepladders, my legs can't walk anymore, wait, i'm suffocating, there's no health, and what kind of health is there in the sixth decade, and i thought so until i tried herovital gerovital+ is a phytovitamin complex that cares for the heart and strengthens the body. gerovital+ good health, active life. the novelty of herovital energy. even more iron for good deeds. herovital energy - reception once a day. there are discounts on pectolovan plyushch. 10% more expensive in pharmacies. there are discounts on pulmopriz of 20% in pharmacies of travel gangs and savings. premium sponsor of the national team

represents united by football together stronger congratulations, this is a joint project of the tv channel and the atr tv channel, together beraber we talk about the temporarily occupied crimea and about the way. him de-occupation and reintegration, my name is khrystyna yatskiv and i greet grandfather muzhdapayev. salam alaikum, khrystyna khanim and all viewers. well, let's start by outlining this week's main topics. of course, crimea was on the lips of ukrainian officials and our international friends, it was also talked about abroad, this is connected with the anniversary of the large-scale invasion, the second anniversary of the large-scale

invasion of the russian federation. to ukraine and , of course, with the events that unfolded 10 years ago, no one would forget that this it has been going on for 10 years, and not a single institution, foreign or otherwise , will convince us that we have been living in a war for only two years, just like that, in order to bring victory closer, we actually call on you to join the ranks of the armed forces of ukraine, defense forces of ukraine, and a large number of our colleagues have also... joined the military campaign against the russian occupier, and we have a whole battalion that is being formed in one way or another and that is setting itself the ambitious goal of liberating the crimean peninsula. ayder, please remind me, well, that's it the crimean 48th separate assault battalion named after noman chilidzhikhan, i think that all our viewers, regardless of whether they are crimean

or ukrainian. in the end, all of us ukrainians know who a chechen is, he is a hero of the crimean people, the first president after the collapse of the russian empire of crimea, well, then he, like all ukrainian figures of that time, was killed, and this is the battalion named here for his portrait on the chevron, and he once dreamed that all crimeans would live. happily, so that no one disturbs or destroys their lives in any way, his dream did not come true, he was killed, he was killed by the bolsheviks, the russians killed him when they came together with almost all the crimean intelligentsia of that time, and it so happened that lenur slyamov, the head of the crimean tatar tv channel atr, where i have the honor to work, he is now the commander battalion of a separate assault

battalion of the 48th. nomana chilijahan armed forces military base, where he has been the commander for more than six months, and our crimeans also serve there , many of whom, by the way, you probably know, just in person from some reports there or just from life, who lived in crimea, well, there are many people there from all over ukraine, and from crimea, ukrainians, and even from volyn, by size, from completely different regions, who strive together with crimeans to fight for crimea in the southern direction, they are there, and they need our support, you probably know, you know exactly what the difficulties are in the military right now, which is the lack of ammunition, the lack of almost all of these, well, things that are simply needed every day, so i'm asking you how to call this phone so that if you want to know how

to say it correctly, well, to be shorter, to recruit yes, i'm sorry, yes , you can call this battalion, as well as qr codes, there are card numbers, paypal, so what, we have to collect, by the way, according to the plan, these are 50 drones with night vision with thermal imaging cameras, we have already collected thanks to you, 40 pieces, 10 left, i think we will collect it this week, help close this collection for. this for the next week, thank you very much for your attention and support together until victory harim serbes solajak, well, now we will talk about what trends are observed in the temporarily occupied newly appointed fsb officers who have recently arrived on the peninsula are trying to show their effectiveness in crimea, who regularly detain someone, regularly search someone, regularly become victims of this pressure,

in particular representatives of the crimean tatars. who people and very much.