connected, unfortunately, with the supply of relevant systems from the western countries, in relation to the su-34, it is quite easy to count them. 14 were shot down by the armed forces of ukraine in the last month. it is worth mentioning that the occupying country can currently produce up to six aircraft per year, that is, in fact, in a month , the armed forces of ukraine destroyed a two-year supply of these bombers, which were produced in recent years by the russian military-industrial complex, this serious, extremely serious performance indicators of the ukrainian popu system. in fact, some foreign observers assume that ukraine is now betting on the use, possibly of the latest models, of those missiles that are needed to shoot down enemy objects in... our skies in order to

eliminate as many russian fighters as possible on the line of combat. we do not know if this is so, but it is less , unfortunately, it has little effect on the number of drops of guided air bombs on lvz, literally on february 29, and we have 152 drops, that is , there are fewer fighters, there are no fewer cabs, but and more, what is it connected with? well, first, let's disprove the information. about the fact that we we are almost using the last missiles , i will remind you, after the last large-scale missile attack on the territory of ukraine, which is january, the government of great britain announced that it is allocating hundreds of additional missiles to air defense systems, hundreds, so here is such information to the western world, to them it is worth being critical, and this is not only about the build, but, accordingly, the latest information of the new york times and other western tabloids about the number. kabibs, let's talk about the fact that

at the beginning of the large-scale invasion , the russian army of occupation had about 140 su-34 only of this modification, which work on the positions of the armed forces of ukraine precisely with the use of kaby. during the two years of the full-scale invasion , about 40 of these aircraft were destroyed, that is , there is still a sufficient amount of aviation equipment to strike the positions of the armed... armed forces of ukraine. 14 su, what does this indicate? about the fact that air defense equipment began to be thrown, these are airy and patriots directly to the line of battle, which was not the case before. and it is worth noting that this tactic is already showing its signs. after the destruction of another a50-u, this is a long-range radar detection aircraft. their number

of departures has actually decreased to zero, because there are only six of them left for the entire territory of the russian empire, this is an indicator. and tell me, please, how you feel about the text published today in the new york times that the ukrainians, unlike the russians, have serious problems specifically with defense structures, which is the reason for the possible actions of the russian armed forces at the front in the area avdiyivka but to this information. i am more than, well, let's put it this way, objectively, it is said that even the review, the ministry of defense of great britain, we do not even take the scoreboard, and where is the latest review of the ministry of defense of great britain regarding the events in the avdepka area, i quote in the original language : the armed forces of ukraine have fewer fixed, well-defended positions, accordingly a question arises for shmyhal and his government, you failed... about the successful

nature of the creation of engineering and fortification structures in the donetsk region, moreover, shmigal himself was in the donetsk region and reported on the presence of engineering and fortification structures of the ukrainian line, let's call it shmegal's line, but where is it? why do the occupiers currently have tactical success after the capture of avdiyivka and the subsequent advance deep into ukrainian territory, the capture of ukrainian settlements. chkina from solid waste. more than enough questions. we were convinced for five months that engineering and fortification structures were being erected on an emergency basis. instead, practice proved the exact opposite. and that despite the fact that the line to which the armed forces of ukraine retreated, taking into account the landscape of the area, and the natural reservoirs there, gave every chance to hold this line of defense, not to give an opportunity. mr. dmytro, today

the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine , oleksandr syrskyi, noted that some commanders of... brigades will be changed to communications with a large, large number of questions that he has accumulated about them, i have a question about the next plan, who will replace them, that is, we we are in a situation where we have highly valued personnel of a similar plan and do we have them who should replace the active brigade commanders, how does it all happen from a military point of view, ms. khrystyna, i hope that they will... replace, actually, but continuing the topic, i would like to note that the change did not take place only in one serviceman, 16 generals were changed, i i hope that, accordingly, they give themselves , well, that is, they understand the similar consequences when

a team of professionals changes, respectively, if they have moved to cleaning already in the grassroots, well, it is not a grassroots comberich, but a higher officer corps, but already... at the level of combrigs, then here is a question, it is related to a political one component, does the situation really require immediate personnel decisions, in my opinion, i emphasize once again, the attacks on the bicombrigs in the complete absence of engineering and fortification structures look, at the very least, inappropriate, and if we talk about the fact that now... is happening in the supply of weapons to ukraine, in general, how do you perceive this french-german controversy, when germany accuses france of the fact that president macron spoke in vain about the possibility of the presence of troops, and france, in fact , almost openly accuses germany of

undersupply of taurus, when president macron calls on other countries to intensify the supply of weapons to ukraine, we perfectly understand what he is talking about, mr. vitaly, absolutely. moreover, today there is a statement by the minister of foreign affairs of france about the fact that there are no differences between germany and france, because moreover, there are points of contact on 80% of all issues related to ukraine. it is said that both france and germany are playing their game with the goal of relegation, once again i emphasize the tension that exists around of ukraine and, accordingly, possible scenarios of military confrontation. with the russian federation, france in turn announces the possibility of sending a military contingent, everyone criticizes france, but for some reason no one notices the statements of jen stoltenberg, respectively, the secretary general of nato, who stated that, yes, nato forces will not be in the sense of collective forces ,

but this does not exclude the presence on the territory of ukraine of an armed contingent of a separate nato country, provided that it is agreed. bilateral, respectively, agreements between ukraine, conditionally france, britain or germany , it is about france, germany, making statements about the impossibility of supplying the tauris, respectively , they conduct a lightning operation of the german special services, the purpose of which was leaked, as if conversations of high-ranking officials of the german air force were intercepted by the russians, where they clearly give. to make the russians understand the possible scenario of the development of events, namely striking the crimean bridge with the use of the same taures, respectively. a big hello to the russian special services, who believe that they have made a lightning move in at the time of publication of these materials. well, you

are being a bit sarcastic about the russian special services, but nevertheless , a counteroffensive plan somehow ended up on the table of the russian federation. even before this counteroffensive actually began, the president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi said this , the head of the main intelligence department kyrylo budanov confirmed this, i will quote him, i will not say more than the president, we had, let's say, information, evidence that the plans became known to the russian federation, this is a serious problem, we use certain ones measures, based on that, mr. dmytro, we did see some counter-offensive ... preparatory actions at least, and the fact that we are now controlling the robots, not that we have several performances along the line of hostilities, isn't that a statement that the counteroffensive was launched, it was launched under conditions when the russian federation already knew what exactly we

could do? mrs. khrystyna, well, let's start with the statements of the president that the counter-attacks are successful, in particular, there is talk of the success of the armed forces of ukraine at sea, and this is... a component of the general plan of the ukrainian counteroffensive, and the second question is about budanov's actual competence, and what's more , the main intelligence department of the ministry of defense. to a possible leak of secret information, this is the sphere of activity of the security service of ukraine, which side is the main intelligence agency here, it comments on everything, from the moment the sun sets over ukraine, to the correspondingly incomprehensible, seemingly military operations on the territory of the russian federation, on the other hand, it does not comment on the facts of fireworks failures the main intelligence department of the ministry of defense during the battles for avdeivka. when the russians were preparing to break through the rear of the ukrainian group for several months, and

they are talking about the use of the drainage system by the russians, and it only took two months to pump out the water, engineering work was carried out under the noses of the ugars, which took at least six months, not even a word. as a result, we see what we see, we were forced to leave the car, now the stupid bezola comes out and tells. the visiting pro once again rejected the side of the defender due to the lack of defenders positions near lesichanske, that's what i would like to remind budanova and bezuglii, because i spoke with her at the time when they were transmitting information about the redeployment of russian engineering and pontoon equipment near lisichanske, they called the place of possible forcing and striking the rear of the ukrainian group. this information was made public by me, including. and on your tv channel, everyone was heard and the news of the company was transmitted, three days passed, not a word was spoken,

there was no reaction, in the end we left lischansk without a fight, because it turns out that the overslept, respectively, the forcing of the river and the flank attack on the positions of the armed forces of ukraine, let them comment on this, and not open their mouths to the ex-commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine. and tell me. tell me, do you still imagine that new offensive actions are possible this year or the next from ukraine, what is needed for this? mr. vitaly, i am a realist, and i see that at least until the month of may, we must keep the situation under control, prevent the occupiers from developing tactical success in donetsk region, with the main task of the occupiers during the spring period is an attempt to seize the whole. the territory of donetsk region, only later, at the moment of stabilization of the front line, we can talk

about the fact that we have created the prerequisites for a ukrainian counteroffensive and, accordingly , the russian offensive has come to naught, i have big questions when i read the western press, which reports on the possibility of a russian offensive in the months of may, the offensive has not ended for a single day since october last year, and it continues to this day. along the entire length of the ukrainian-russian front, it is 1,200 km, that is incompetence or an attempt to mislead ukrainian society. thank you, mr. dmytro, dmytro snegerov, a political scientist and military analyst, was on the air and we talked about the latest events at the front, about the situation related to aid to ukraine, now we will break for a few minutes, but you will stay with us. what interesting dialogues are

discounts on valeriana bolgarska 10% in pharmacies plantain pam and savings. rose b. rose b. professional hair care at home . rose b: buy plantain from pharmacies. there are discounts on combi grip 20% in pharmacies for... in pharmacies plantain bam and savings vasyl zima's big broadcast, this is a big ether, my name is vasyl zima, and we are starting two hours of air time, two hours of your time, many important topics today we will discuss with you, two hours to learn about... to be in morchivka with us, a course of economic news, time to

talk about money during the war, alexander alexander, congratulations, please, and sports news, review sports events from yevhen postukhov, two hours in the company of loved ones presenters thank you very much to elina chechenna for the information about culture news. presenters who have become like relatives to many. to tell us about the weather for the day, i will come, as well as distinguished guests of the studio. andriy parubiy, people's deputy of ukraine, was also the chairman of the verkhovna rada of ukraine. events of the day in two hours. vasyl's big broadcast. a project for the intelligent and those who care about espresso in the evening. the premium sponsor of the national team represents. united

by football, stronger together. we continue. khrystyna yatskiv, vitaly portnikov and oleksandr motsyk, ambassador of ukraine to the united states from 2010 to the 15th year. congratulations, mr. oleksandr, glory to ukraine. good evening, glory to the heroes, glory. congratulations, mr. oleksandr. so, let's start with the latest ratings, which are now given by american publications, in particular the new york times, and there former president of the united states donald trump is ahead of president joseph biden by 5%. points 48 to 43, but the most important thing we know from these polls is that trump is beating biden, according to these polls in those key states where, as a rule, the fate of the american presidency is being decided, is it possible to believe that trump really has a better chance of winning the elections today than his possible opponent, well

, i think it is too early to talk about it. we simply have an advantage in those seven key states that are always talked about as being important in deciding the fate of the presidency in the united states, but there are a number of other circumstances that could make the weather different. well, first of all, uh, uh, right now, all of america is waiting for the supreme court's decision on the state decision colorado on removal. ex-president trump from the lists for the primaries in this state, and we know that the state of maine also made such a decision and recently the state of illinois, that is, a lot will depend on the decision of the supreme court, so today there is an opinion that most likely the supreme the us court will not legally interfere in political

matters, i.e., the election of the president of the united states of america, but it... comes out of the debate that was on the first day in the supreme court, what exactly will be decided, what will be the decision accepted, we will see very soon, probably, or maybe later, it depends, of course, whether trump will already be a guaranteed contender for the presidential seat of the united states from the republican party, or maybe nikki haley still has some chances? ugh. ugh, well, literally on march 5 in three days super tuesday will take place, which in most states should determine the fate of the primaries from the democratic republican party there, i understand that whatever this super tuesday is, after all, the court decision, about which you say, it will be decisive

, so the decision will be important, and if the supreme court imagines that if the supreme court ... sided with the colorado state court, then there will be a situation where maybe a dozen or more states will also will make the appropriate decisions to remove ex-president trump from the voting lists for these primaries, and then the situation can really change, but this super tuesday, it will solve the situation in many ways, and nikki haley herself said that ... welcome to the big tuesday , she will continue to participate in tryouts to become the only candidate from the republican party for the elections, and after that he will decide what to do next, and on the other hand , even if you imagine that trump will not be able to take part in the elections, this will not automatically

determine the presidential candidate from the republican party based on maybe just completely. change the whole configuration, yes, yes, most likely no , of course, that a number of other candidates will immediately appear, i think that a number of other prominent figures of the republican party will want to enter the race, then it will be completely different country, but if today we are talking about ex-president trump and president biden, then this is exactly what we are talking about, that the situation can change, well, well, let's imagine that they... both participate, mr. alexander, so trump participates and biden is participating, who do you think, well, you can't ask, has a better chance of winning. difficult task, you know, yes, you can say 49 to 51 and give preference to one of the candidates, but it is still difficult to talk about it now, there are still many

months before the election and there is still a lot of water leak out and a lot of things will change, so now you can guess mostly over coffee and porridge, maybe some political scientists or commentators can do it, for me as an ambassador, i think that it will not work, but... oleksandr, well, as for those trades, which we have seen for weeks until recently, which involved seemingly certain concessions by the democrats on the border, and in the end, they show these concessions, the republicans are not happy, it still does not lead to any votes for aid to ukraine , israel and taiwan. it turns out that not quite the us-mexico border was the cornerstone. it seems that the aid to other countries from the united states is a real cornerstone that prevents the republicans from breathing calmly, they are constantly trying to somehow find some

options here, and there is one person whose decision and steps, it seems to me now, depends even a little more than from donald trump and joseph biden, this is the speaker of the house of representatives of the us congress, mr. johnson, here... it seems to get together and show that you are a politician, to remain in history and maybe help defeat real world evil, that's what he could do, but for some reason , staying in the orbit of ex-president donald trump, that's what he's choosing so far, i don't know, i'm thinking of a boy's mind, maybe somewhere in the journalistically, maybe you have an opinion on this matter, please, the opinion is this, indeed, if mike johnson, the speaker of the lower house, puts the question of this package of aid to ukraine, israel and taiwan to a vote, then this package will win, as experts believe american,

somewhere in the order of 280 votes, and it is needed for for the decision to be made by some 218, 219, 220 votes, so of course everything depends on him now, he is under the influence of ex-president trump, but he is also under pressure. and a small group of radicals in the house of representatives , republican republicans, who are said to be walking in the fairway of ex-president trump, who are pressuring him and threatening him that if he brings the issue to a vote, he may lose his seat, so he really has a situation mike johnson has a hard time, but he's also on me... how on me should take into account what indeed, the majority of republicans in the house of representatives are unequivocally in favor of aid to ukraine and for this aid to be

resolved by voting as soon as possible. in principle, there is another question here, in your opinion, is there any additional opportunity for president biden to somehow come to an agreement with the congressman, he is now meeting with the leaders of the congress all the time, what could this lead to? and here, you know, mr. vitaly, this is a difficult question, whether president trump will somehow be able to come to an agreement, here, yes, here really, the whole talk is about domestic political struggle in the context of the next presidential election, and here many factors have come together that affect the current situation and whether a vote on this will be decided in the near future. package and whether a decision has been made or not, so obviously president biden may also have some additional elements of influence, let's say so, but

there is no guarantee that they can unambiguously resolve the issue either, i think, that in the end everything depends on how we were just talking about this, whether mike johnson would put the bailout question on the ballot, this is his prerogative, as one more one possibility, the so-called petition, here, but it is a very complicated complicated thing, that is , it is meant to gather the votes of 218 members of the house of representatives, who would vote for the aid of ukraine and thus solve this issue, but here it is necessary... er, that in making a positive decision on this issue the republicans, well, and the democrats took part first, well, this is a very complex construction,

and uh... taking into account that almost every member of the chamber has representatives have their own interests, which concern, in particular electoral district of the next elections, then this construction is very complicated, and it seems to me that it cannot work, at least in the current conditions. mr. oleksandr, a lot was said about what toker carlson did for putin, a lot in fact, and maybe in... with his interview, with his presentation, someone prone to such types, fell in love with the russian president, but the fact is that when he returned, in fact, having justified in his brain and perhaps even in his heart the information he heard, he began to give a completely different feedback. and tell me, be it please, how does american society react to this feedback, is it possible to conduct some analysis here? well, even toker carlson is saying that

what i heard...is just nonsense and putin is just justifying his attack on ukraine? well, it seems to me that he, to be more precise , he meant, told this putin story about nazi ukraine, and here in this segment he said that this is not a dream, because there can be no nazism in the year 2024, well, but in general, he understood, of course, that... the interview went well not really an interview at all, but his submission to putin, his, his effort to avoid any sharp questions that are typical for journalism, well, actually, he acted not as a journalist, but as a person who is constantly putin there, well, if they gave him the opportunity to show what a small leader

he is and... everything else, secondly, after returning to america, he decided to justify himself a little, but he was also interviewed by a rather strong, strong correspondent, i will say so, to pretty strong strong man and what i saw is ee carlson just uh if saying no that it is not. regarding nazism in ukraine, at the same time he repeated all russian narratives about ukraine and the war against ukraine in general, that putin wants peace and ukraine does not want peace, that nato provoked russia's attack on ukraine, that ukraine cannot win everything in this war , and that he was very surprised to see how ukraine

looks in terms of democracy. much better than russia, he even asked several times if it was so and said that he did not completely agree with it, and he said that moscow is much better than new york and all the time criticized america in that time, well, licking the situation in russia, that is, in my opinion, he is a very person who has a very, very negative attitude towards ukraine, and for me this is really a big surprise. since he is an american after all, he went through such a great practical school at fox news and has such a mentality regarding ukraine. ugh. and tell me, mr. oleksandr, how do you generally see it, now in this situation with the help of ukraine, can we really say that europe is somehow intercepting the initiative in the united states, or is it forced to intercept it? well, she, if, with

one side forced by the fact that he sees a real threat, and president macron clearly said that russia cannot win this war, and that he expressed the idea of ​​the need to send military uniforms to ukraine, well, let's say, military, military from western countries, and we we know that this idea, although the first reaction was from some countries, i would... say so cautiously negatively, but later, but not completely negative, they said, maybe, that now is not the time and so on, but now it is already four countries talk about it as exactly what is needed, and i am sure that from this the stream will turn out to be a big river of support for ukraine, and that is why europe, on the one hand , understands that it is necessary to consciously go... if it is

considering an increase.