Skip to main content

tv   [untitled]    March 7, 2024 1:30pm-2:01pm EET

1:30 pm
not all steps have been taken, no steps have been taken regarding the proper supply of weapons , the economic sanctions have a completely laughable effect so far, when we hear that even british firms, britain seems to be our most loyal and most determined ally, but we learn that in russian weapons and there are elements that are supplied from the west and british companies cooperate. with the russians, that is, there are many things in which the west could be more decisive, and uh, but one more short remark, it seems to me that he will be more decisive to instigate, how unfortunate it is, but there is a threat of catastrophe in ukraine, that is , we heard as soon as there was a thesis that the russians could open a front, the thesis
1:31 pm
that ukraine is suffocating without ammunition supplies, began to stir, started , the president of the czech republic proposed, the prime minister, i'm sorry, the prime minister of the czech republic proposed his idea, macron made strong statements in the us congress, after all , some movement has started, but there is only such a threat that ukraine will not withstand . may, unfortunately, prompt the west to take more decisive action. the president of france, mentioned by you , mr. maxime, stated that he does not rule out that the troops of individual countries, members of the north atlantic alliance, may be on the territory of ukraine, later he said that there is no need to be cowards in the current situation, and called on the allies to help ukraine as much as possible. because
1:32 pm
the future of europe depends on this help. boris pistorius, the minister of defense of germany, says that macron's call not to be cowards will not solve the problem with military support for ukraine, and the supreme representative eu foreign affairs and security policy minister josep borel said that it does not make sense to create an eu army yet, because there is also a lot of talk about it in europe now. simultaneously. the coordinator of strategic communications of the national security council of the white house , john kirby, says that the united states of america is not going to send its troops to participate in hostilities in ukraine . from the very beginning, president biden stated very clearly: there will be no american troops fighting on the battlefield within the borders of ukraine, and you know that president zelenskyi...
1:33 pm
is not asking for this, he is only asking for means and capabilities, he never asked for foreign troops to fight for his country, he and his army will do that, but they need means, and that's it here we have to help them, mr. oleksiy, but our western partners do not want to send military contingents to the territory of ukraine, they are quite modest, they give us... quite modest help, they give military aid, and the united states of america even now cannot in any way decide in which way and give the same help to the military. in your opinion, the west is going to inflict a strategic defeat on putin, if they do nothing for this, or do minimally. you said the key words: extremely modest aid and extremely, extremely slow and careful for... measures to limit the influence
1:34 pm
of the putin regime and russia in general, but when we talk about financial support for ukraine, i remember 2009, the beginning of the ten-year debt crisis in greece, then for little greece, so that it coped with the issue of debts, international financial institutions and the european union allocated 260 billion euros in loans, 260. in order to solve the issue of debts, and 50 billion for four years for ukraine in order to solve the question of its survival and the question of security for, at least eastern europe. and that's why i think that many of our partners understand this very well, that what they allocate in ukraine for support, equipment, weapons, ammunition, firstly, it's not enough, it's extremely little, secondly, it happens extremely chaotically, when ...... countries, leading countries
1:35 pm
the european union is wringing its hands, saying, well , it didn’t work out later, let’s increase production, but the president of the czech republic says: stop, we have over... a million shells, a huge number, and that is, this is the dream plan of 800, 800 thousand shells, 800, 800 shows a certain chaos in decision -making, there is no certain vision in a month, in six months, in a year, on the other hand, there must also be, i think, certain criticisms of the ukrainian authorities, because there are issues that need to be worked on, if we're talking about finances, i think we have... for a long time it is necessary to put on the agenda not only the issue of financial support for ukraine, but also the write-off of part of the debts, which will reduce our debt burden, we will be able to save money quite seriously, and
1:36 pm
the very issue of war in such a force majeure as war, it allows us to start these negotiations , to start the process, and this process can be quite effective, and therefore for... right now, it's simple, i think this is one of the key events of this year, these are macron's words that he does not rule out participation, involvement french military to work in ukraine, it is extremely large, and the details can go further, it will be technical staff, it will be training, instructors, it will be the third, fourth format, but the key thing is that macron started this discussion. europe began to perceive the key security factors for itself more realistically and to be quite critical of the possibility of a quick victory over putin. this is important for us, because macron's statement was picked up to one degree or another by four more
1:37 pm
states, these are states that have less influence on decision-making, but at least the discussion around this issue has started. this is an extremely big plus and... and i think that this statement itself, it will have consequences for both weapons, and equipment, and finances. well, macron acted simply as an atypical politician. he went against the will of his voters, well, at least, the results of a sociological survey, polls indicate that it is unlikely that average french voters will agree with the thesis of their president, that is, it is an extremely responsible step of macron. as a policy, and not only as a policy on the scale of france, c on a global scale, because it is about the fact that macron may be taking over the leadership now on the european continent, in security matters, because it is about the fact that if or in the event that
1:38 pm
trump wins the presidential elections in the united states of america, then it is possible the whole structure of the north atlantic... can change, or, let's say , be adjusted in some way, because trump says that those who do not pay, we will not protect them, or do not pay enough into the general budget of the north atlantic alliance. can you, sir? to maxim, based on what macron said and what european politicians are saying, about the european army, although they are denying it now and saying that it is impossible, is it possible that a new security structure is already involved. because ukraine is one of the cornerstones of this new european security architecture, but in the format of the north atlantic alliance, we cannot be members of nato in the near future, while the war is going on, but in the format of a new european security structure of some kind, where
1:39 pm
we will play a much larger role , than we can be in the north atlantic alliance, is such a scenario possible? the scenario is definitely possible, but there are many prerequisites for it to be realized, and to be honest, the end of the war with a positive result for us, i would say optically, our victory in this war, is a necessary condition for such alliances to be formed and were sustainable and were formalized. and so on, because alliances are still formed and developed mainly in peacetime, during war few people risk it, so to speak to get involved in a fight after
1:40 pm
it started, i think many european politicians crossed themselves when putin attacked ukraine, and they remembered that at one time they... no, they didn't accept ukraine into nato or start it movement even in nato, by and large, because it would require them to already intervene in the fight, enter into a... war, and we can talk about the fact that maybe putin would not have attacked, but what is happening there in the baltic region, the threat looming over individual nato member countries shows that such a calculation is also, so to speak, controversial, therefore, if we talk about the future security configuration in our part of the world or in central, eastern europe. then it will be determined mainly by the results
1:41 pm
of the russian-ukrainian war, how ukraine will come out of this war, how russia will come out of this war, so to speak, there will be key factors that will influence the choice and decisions of european partners, they, of course, so to speak, they will be very careful and watch over their own. and as for macron's statement and the logic of the one that develops in borders of the euro-atlantic community and so on, then i would draw attention to another factor that few people mention now, they are talking about the cautious chancellor of the federal republic of germany, who will lose against macron, in this case, but less talk about this one. the position recently taken by the diplomacy of great britain, that is
1:42 pm
, britain has not changed its position, so to speak, but activity, leadership, so to speak, today, it does not claim it, as it was during the previous prem' the prime minister, therefore a chance appears, a niche appears, but it is still a niche. political to decisive steps and new military-political alliances, i think, is still very far. thank you gentlemen, after a short break we will return to our conversation, for the audience i will tell you what will be interesting next, do not switch. there are discounts on microlax of 20% in psarynskyi, bam and ochadnyi pharmacies. and what will give birth, you will see? poems that unite the nation through generations will be heard in a special way:
1:43 pm
the telniuk sisters in lviv with the nash shevchenko program, a musical interpretation with a symphony orchestra that inspires to believe, fight, live march 11 in the theater of zankovetska sister telniuk do not miss tickets to contramarkaua, live sound, what to do? not to get sick. vitamin c, d3, zinc. and the main thing is quercitin to strengthen blood vessels. just take quertin immuno. in one capsule, four components together. quertin immuno to strengthen immunity and protect blood vessels. there are discounts on voltaren forte of 20% in psaryznyk, bam, and oskad pharmacies. rose b. rose b. professional hair care at home . rogus b. buy. in pharmacies , plantain, save money. turn on a heart-pounding investigation. the new
1:44 pm
chapter of the hbo series is already on me. a true detective. find out what secrets the alaskan ice hides. exclusively in the megogo subscription. there are 20% discounts on aquaspray oxy in psarynskyk pharmacies, you and save. there are 20% discounts on pulmo priz in travel ban and savings pharmacies. the premium sponsor of the national team represents. united by football, stronger together. see this week in the judicial control program with tatyana shustrova. searches in the dnipro district court of kyiv. who was responsible for the illegal actions of law enforcement officers? intervention? judicial activity, the challenge is serious enough, and why the sbi refused to initiate criminal
1:45 pm
proceedings, they cannot put themselves in prison, although there is every reason for this. on thursday, march 7, at 5:45 p.m., watch the judicial control program with tatiana shustrova on the espresso tv channel. this is the verdict program, my name is serhii rudenko, we work live, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms. for those who are currently watching us live on these platforms, please. like this video, subscribe to our pages, participate in our survey, today we ask you about this, friends, do you approve of zelenskyi's decision not to attend biden's speech to congress, where at this... speech, at this ceremony, at these, they wanted to seat zelenskyi next to yulia navalny, if you approve of zelenska's decision not to attend biden's speech because of this, then vote on the telecast by phone at 0800 211 381, no, 0800 211 382 and please,
1:46 pm
we will conduct this vote throughout the broadcast, at the end of the program we will sum up the results. of this vote, all calls to these numbers are available free on youtube, everything is quite simple, yes no, choose, and or write your comment, what do you think about it. today we have maksym rozumny and oleksiy koshel as our guests, we are talking not only about foreign policy, but also about domestic policy, today it became known that the center of the election commission stated that there are no questions about the legitimacy of president volodymyr zelensky after may 20 , he will lead... the state until the end of the martial law regime, this is stated in the response of the central election commission to the request glavkom internet edition that there will be no issues with legitimacy until the end of martial law, after the end of martial law, after may 20, after the end of this, grant martial law, within 30 days, after
1:47 pm
the end of this legal state, presidential elections will be announced. at the same time as the elections , information about the presidential possibilities, the current presidential possibilities of zelenskyi, and zaluzhno, sociology from socis appeared. if the presidential elections were held this year, the majority of ukrainians would support the candidacy of valery zaluzhny, according to evidence the results of this company's social survey. valery zaluzhny has the most support - 31.3%. volodymyr zelenskyi - 21.70. at the same time, in the second round with zelenskyi, zaluzhnyi would get 67% against 32% for zelenskyi, such sociology, in principle, mr. oleksiy, to you, as a person who follows almost all the elections that took place, starting, if i am not mistaken , since 1994 in the committee
1:48 pm
of voters of ukraine, here, that is, for 30 years you have been monitoring all elections. processes, all the results of the elections, the course of the election campaign, during the last few months we see there is a lot of different sociology, which talks about the presidential elections, about who can win and about the leaders of the trust rating, despite the fact that it is absolutely obvious that these are you, it is not obvious that these presidential elections will not be held soon, or there will be, what does this have to do with it is my conviction, deep conviction, that during... martial law, there cannot be any presidential, parliamentary, or local elections. there is a provision of the constitution that clearly states that parliamentary elections should not be held, but this provision, its logic, extends to other articles constitutions, and at least the leading experts in constitutional law that either i have spoken with or am familiar with their opinion,
1:49 pm
are all unanimous that the president is legitimate after may 20, and there is no debate. in this regard, it should not be, but why did this discussion appear , in my opinion, this discussion was provoked by the bank, because i will remind you that in october-november last year, active topics about elections began, they say that it is impossible to hold, but the law can be changed , and none of the representatives of the authorities, with the exception, by the way, of mr venislavsky, then the president's representative in the verkhovna rada, except for him, everyone talked about the fact that... in principle, if we want, elections can be held, we will change one law here, another, 226 votes, no problem and so on. and now, when the situation was shaken up, now it became clear that no, dear, now we are mentioning the constitution, we should have mentioned it before, make a submission to the constitutional court, get a clear conclusion, get a clear conclusion and
1:50 pm
stop any speculation, because it is dangerous, we are rocking the state during war and now, by the way, it is already difficult to apply to the constitutional court, because there are only 13 members out of 18, and 10 votes are needed to make a decision, that is , there are already serious problems, so now we have seen the statements of the cec, and statements from the representatives of the servants of the people party, i think this topic will live on for months, and politicians will speculate on it, and russia will try, so i am ... convinced that there can't be any elections now, can't, uh all the ratings that appear are quite conditional, well, at least in the period... of the war, talking about ratings is a very conditional thing, but they show a trend, indeed, and kmis, and previous polls show, and socis, and
1:51 pm
kmis, and others, show that there is a tendency to increase distrust in the authorities, towards power institutions, in some it is not just an increase of mistrust, but, you know, at an angle of 45°, a fall of mistrust, well, at least towards the verkhovna rada and the cabinet of ministers, so... we need to draw conclusions about this, because this trend is quite threatening during the war, because there is distrust of individual authorities institutions, and there is distrust and growing distrust of certain personnel in power, this is generally a decrease in trust in the state, including in the mobilization and many other things, so it is necessary to stop political games as much as possible now and draw sociological conclusions. not from the ratings, but from other indicators, but on the other hand, mr. maksym, these are the results of sociology, although they were probably predicted, and in principle
1:52 pm
it would be possible even without conducting sociology and social polls, well, in principle, to predict that such a proportion can be without that, but this sociology actually gives understanding not only to the authorities about what is happening and... who is a competitor, well , a potential competitor, but also gives a potential competitor the opportunity to understand, and what to him, to do something with this trust rating, because one way or another we see that the meritorious person has been left behind, but still the trust rating for the meritorious person is high enough, and here the question is whether or not the meritorious person has, there will be no temptation to start with the creation of a party, and well , that is also possible. be or in his associates on headed by his name or headed by his image? well, once in this studio we
1:53 pm
talked about this situation about zaluzhnyi, his potential political start of running for president or as part of some political force, and we mentioned that the situation is similar. certain people, certain groups pushed the leaders out, sometimes , well, if not contrary to them, then regardless of their wishes, they pushed them into big politics, into this, into the ratings of sociological services and so on, well, i would remember the same viktor yushchenko, who there called leonid kuchma as a father and generally there positioned himself as a banker and generally so. very forced, so to speak, became the president , although later it seems that he liked it, well, that’s it, so this whole story with the hard-working, with
1:54 pm
his rating, it also has this flavor of political technology, but here i agree with my colleague that the game this was initiated, well, from both sides , and it was bankova who started it with... her gain, i mean the whole story with the possibility of holding elections, with the regular publication of high ratings of the current head of state , respectively, and in this situation, of course, that political intrigue will only grow, a decrease in the rating of the government, a decrease in its popularity, this is the fate of almost all politicians, especially. in ukraine, there are already many of these sinusoids drawn on which what happens there with the rating of the head of state in the second, third, fourth year
1:55 pm
of the reign, in the conditions of the war, this logic was somewhat adjusted, but it has not been canceled, besides , we do not know when the war ends, there is a high probability that president zelensky will have to sign the peace that... not or agree informally to the a peace that will not satisfy many ukrainians , under these conditions, of course, that his popularity may drop sharply, and the question of an alternative will arise, but today we see a very serious application for an alternative, we do not yet know what the hall thinks about this general zaluzhnyi himself, because after his resignation he says practically nothing, but the application. this is very serious. thank you, mr. maxim. mr. oleksiy, what can return the rating to volodymyr zelenskyi. as shmygal says
1:56 pm
that the ministry should be cut by a third, and it is clear that this will help, because the trust rating for zelenskyi will return, because in our country people like it when ministries are cut, when there, even if it is a simulated reduction, a third of the ministries will be cut, but the officials will not be cut, but different ministries will be cut, as it already is it happened more than once, or state committees will be created, as it also happened more than once. what, in your opinion, can now restore the trust rating of zelenskyi, or increase the trust rating of zelenskyi? you know, i'm afraid that there is nothing left, that is, a large amount has been made system errors, a few months ago volodymyr zelenskyi spoke during a press conference about the decision-making mechanism in the state, he talked about five or six close people for whom, by the way, we did not
1:57 pm
vote in the elections, we are there... we understand, that this is mr. yermak, several deputy heads of the office, we, the president himself, voiced these names, and for me, you know, it was shocking the fact that among these five or six i wanted to hear, i wanted to hear the name of the prime minister, the chairman the verkhovna rada and the secretary of the national security council, but they were simply not there, that is, if we speak strategically, then i think that now nothing will help volodymyr zelensky, because the structure is illogical, no. an active management mechanism, and therefore mistakes will continue, mistakes will continue, mistakes will be made based on an emotional component, the mechanism of authority will not work in a sufficiently high-quality way, and therefore this array of mistakes, it will continue to accumulate, and why am i so skeptical i say this because the authorities today do not even have an understanding of what a lousy and
1:58 pm
ineffective model they have built. this model can't work, you see, we can manage the country in the format of a soviet collective farm, so for a certain period of time, there is a format, uh, management of red directors, or a format of a soviet collective farm, such one-man decision-making, this mechanism can work for a short time, but working for years to make the state effective is illogical, and that is why we see a huge number of managerial... managerial mistakes, we don't appoint the british ambassador there for six months, it's a lot, it's just catastrophically a lot, there's not even an understanding, we do not appoint an ambassador to the netherlands, china has not had an ambassador for about two years, in china, and ending with the latest examples, when yesterday the parliament decided not to hold session meetings in order to make a pr
1:59 pm
trip to the front, well... you know it's strange to me, to say the least, because i saw the agenda, there is a large array of european integration bills, thank you, mr. oleksiy, we have to finish, please give us regulations, just like in the verkhovna rada of ukraine, thank you oleksiy koshel, head of the committee of voters of ukraine and maksym rozumny, doctor of political science, were guests of our program today, during this program we conducted a poll, friends, we asked you about this, whether you approve of zelenska's decision. not to attend biden's speech to congress 44% yes 50 56% - no, it's on tv, i'm putting a full stop on it, it was a verdict program , provivi serhiy rudenko, take care of yourself and your family, goodbye.
2:00 pm
greetings to all viewers of espresso, i'm anna yevomelnyk, and this is news. let me start with this: the russians are shelling kherson in the morning. a 45-year-old man was injured, now he is in hospital, he is being examined, said the head of the region oleksandr prokudin. a private house, garage premises and cars parked there were damaged. the russians are not stopping the terror of the front-line areas of the zaporizhzhia region, the enemy shelled the village of bilenke with cluster munitions. a man was injured, information about the destruction is being clarified, - noted the head of the region , ivan fedorov. one woman died and another was injured due to enemy shelling in vovchansk, kharkiv region. the russians hit the city with guided aerial bombs. kissed in private sector, at least 12 residential buildings were damaged.
2:01 pm
houses, the head of the region oleg said.

11 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on