and sociology appeared already after the very interesting appointment, what concerns the leaders of the opposition, but we are a little later . that agriman has not yet been approved in london, it’s just that it was announced before that and, as diplomat valeriy chal says, who was... literally 15 minutes ago , he said on my air that, well, this is not uncharacteristic of all diplomatic rules, that this is a violation of the vienna convention, and very much so many questions arise, and why was it announced so quickly? well, i don't know why it was announced so quickly, but if we talk about the country, then of course it is better for the country to have an ambassador in britain than to live without an ambassador in such difficult times. and this is not the worst candidate,

even though he has no work experience in the diplomatic service, during the war a combat general who represents our country in our country as an ally, this is one of the countries that supports ukraine the most, this is of course a plus and positive, regarding valery himself fedorovych, i think that this is also positive for him. because he remains in the information field, he remains in a leadership position, if he were not there, and he remains part of our political landscape, and maybe the authorities really thought that in this way they were hiding a worthy political future, but it seems to me that this is not a fact. they just add to him

some extra diplomatic features, as mrs. yanina said, and i will also note that, regarding agriman, yes, we do not yet know whether britain agreed, but the candidacy of zaluzhnyi was not publicly announced as soon as possible without the prior consent of the other party, so i hope that there will be no difficulties... we will remember that there were rumors about the appointment of reznikov, who was the minister of defense, as ambassador, but only rumors, and publicly, officially, i don't remember that it was announced, probably even if there was such an attempt, the british side did not show any signals that it did not want to see such an ambassador, so what we are talking about zaluzhny today how about the candidate... at the official level

of the approved, most likely says that britain also agreed with him, and the best diplomat, of course, during the war, it is usually the ukrainian army, and the person who heads the army is the main diplomat in general, well, i hope that in the office of the president of ukraine they will not shut us off from other networks because we are the country's chief diplomat, let's call it sloppy, that he was the country's chief diplomat, but during the war , that's how it is, let's listen to what zelensky said yesterday , when announcing about... zaluzhnyi as the new ambassador to great britain, today also approved the candidacy of our country's ambassador to great britain, general valery zaluzhnyi told me about such a direction for himself: diplomatic, the ministry of foreign affairs of ukraine sent a corresponding request to agreman. our alliance with britain must only grow stronger. yanina, in this situation. in

principle, one thing is clear: the office of the president and the ministry of foreign affairs of ukraine for the ambassador to be involved, obviously, great britain is also for it, because it is enough a serious position and an important position , great britain is such a big military hub, and they are great friends for us, and they support us both militarily, politically, and diplomatically, but we haven’t heard from the most diligent person, that is, did he... agree to it, because there should be at least three parties here in order for everything to work out, well, on march 6, i had my birthday, my fortieth birthday, and valery fedorovych congratulated me, we congratulate you too, thank you, thank you, and i, of course, i would like to meet him and i would like to do it just the material about the anniversary of the death on the next day, march 7, of da vinci dmytro kutsebayel the hero. of ukraine, who by word of mouth

loved zaluzhny, and zaluzhny loved him, and we were just making materials, i wrote to valery fedorovych like this after congratulating him, he said that for now there are no comments. it won't be in the near future, but at that time i didn't even know that he would be appointed ambassador, in any case, at the moment valery fedorovych remains silent, and it is connected, i'm sure, with many reasons, including i'm sure that there are arrangements with the office of the president, which continues to be afraid of the figures of the ratings of the good-hearted, and i think that despite the fact that the ambassador is still public. he is a diplomat who, considering our partners, allies , one of the most powerful, our future military alliances, the construction, god forbid, of joint defense enterprises, will certainly have

to comment on all this, in which regime he will do it, as articles , materials, posts, channels, and all this will be in written form, we will see and... or it will be done live, we will see, but for now valery fedorovych has no desire, or i do not know it is absolutely right to comment on agreements, so one thing i can say is that i would take it as impudence to give my assessment to the former commander-in-chief, for me he remained just a legendary person, i watched from the perspective of friendship with the army. several very critical moments in our history, and after the release of valery fedorovych, when, with his advice and confidence in the military , he, believe me, had an influence on them making certain decisions in very difficult areas,

so i will return to this issue, valery fedorovych - very balanced a person and you saw how he said goodbye to this position, when the internet and facebook were boiling. and everyone talked about the fact that they said he was fired, unfairly, and everything else valery fyodorovych said goodbye to zelensky in the arms of presenting the award, and no one, not a single person had any other reason to think differently about this whole story, so it was all done wisely , understanding the entire background of this situation. i think you know about her very well on the espresso broadcast, and vitaly portnikov has talked about it more than once, let's not repeat ourselves, but now these shots in fact, then there was a period of valery fedorovych's recovery and negotiations, which he confidently conducted

with the president's office, and they reached this option, the option of the position, which, i think, he accepted consciously and positively. and for the success of the country , including, i think, it is unlikely that we would now discuss the diplomatic situation there , i hung up, but you hear me, right, yes, yes, yes, everything is fine, here, i think, i think that without communication with his colleagues with his team, which left the general staff after the dismissal in full, that is, everyone close people, he communicated, consulted, and this decision was made in view of his effectiveness in this position, despite everything, but... that's why you and i will see effective work, believe me, i am valery fedorovich, in addition to the fact that you this was seen, in addition to the fact that he is a combat general - he is also a person with a high level of purely personnel qualities of a diplomat, and believe me, he showed them

more than once in various situations, long before february 24, 22, and in the walls of the president's office including, there are simply a number of things that combat generals. speaking with politicians, novices, dilettantes , cannot accept and working for the benefit of the country, are forced to talk about it all, or write articles in the economist, and then talk again, because all this was perceived, you saw how, or go out and justify the mobilization , although he was not supposed to do this when they put him on the stand, so that he would cover this hole, this short story, which we are all still experiencing now, that is, this... decision valery fedorovych did not say anything yet, but i can gather courage and say , that sure decision is balanced, this not a bone, friends, you will understand, this is not a bone that was thrown to a poor man, he took it, this is not the kind of person who will agree to something, well

, why am i saying this, because we have a tendency in power, well, there, for example, with our former prosecutor general benediktova, yes , who went as an ambassador, i.e. all those who did not come due to various circumstances... they were often appointed ambassadors, that's a meritorious one, i think maybe the president's office had this motivation in a fragmentary way, but from the meritorious decision. .. positively only with an eye on the effectiveness of this work, and i will carefully say that you will see it, i have no doubt about it , about the reasons for the appointment of zuluzhny as the new ambassador of ukraine to great britain, the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine, dmytro kuleba, spoke on the air of the united telethon, let's listen, the president has been looking for maksym for a very long time . but a strong candidate for the position in london, and one of the key requirements was precisely the military

understanding of the military context, because britain is not just our strategic, special strategic partner there, it is one of the leaders in military affairs, in the military with the help of ukraine, they do not send anyone there, london is an extremely important destination for any country, and in communication with... with those ambassadors who work in london, i am convinced that valery zaluzhnyi will be absolutely one of the most respected there figures, and he will bring many, many benefits not only from the point of view of bilateral relations with britain, but also for such backroom diplomacy with the countries of asia, africa and latin america. it is clear with general zaluzhny, because general zaluzhny is a statesman, these are people... who serve the state ukraine and he, as a person who is responsible, she accepted this position and accordingly will

work in this position, but yanina correctly noticed and noted that the day before , sociological data from sotsios was made public, where in the second round, when he is in the presidential round, when zelenskyi and zaluzhnyi come out, respectively, zaluzhnyi gets 60. 7% in the second round, and zelenskyi gets 32. my colleague maksym rozumnyi compared the publication of this sociology, on the eve of zaluzhnyi’s appointment, to a declaration of war or an attack without a declaration of war, that is, he perceives what happened to the zaluzhny precisely as a declaration of war, not well, not declared war, but well, in principle, this sociology is simply murderous. andrii... how do you perceive this history of sociology, which

was made public literally in a day and such a lightning-fast decision to announce the truant as ambassador to great britain, without even waiting for a response from london, so that the staff diplomats simply shrug their shoulders and say, well in principle, this is not done at all, or could this one sociology to push the office of the president in order to solve the question, well, in quotation marks, the question is meritorious. we can't hear you, i think it's audible, yes, yes, uh, yes, i, i think that such decisions are not made quickly after all, but really sociology could have pushed, the office of the president to release their decision earlier than they planned, in order to break this story with information, and so that everyone talks about the appointment, and not about... sociology, such an informational step, well, i also wanted to support yanina, she

mentioned zaluzhnyi's article in zaikonomist and there were also articles in cnn, this could also be one of the reasons why he was appointed to this position, because for the english-speaking world he is one of, well, probably two well-known and recognizable politicians, well, politicians, i i think of ukraine, of course, everyone knows zelensky now in the world, but if you ask who is currently representing ukraine abroad, how about a face, then i think that many would call zaluzhnyi a second person, and this will precisely contribute to the fact that ukraine will be get more weapons, more defense contracts, this is where i see the pragmatic benefits, even if they are possible.

you understand that the weapons of nato countries, they were mainly tested, well, if you do not take the conflicts in which the united states of america is fragmented. participated and provided weapons, in such a volume, in which we became a realistic, real testing ground for the weapons of nato countries, they never had. our current main feature as partners, i emphasize as partners, and value for them is that we have conducted research,

i will explain to the ukrainians, if the analysis of all the weapons they had has increased... their weapons have been tested for many years on training grounds, not in wars, i am especially now emphasizing the newest weapons, that is why valeriy fedorovych knows this very well, and our lobbyists in the united states of america, a group of lobbyists, including volunteers and air intelligence, maria berlinska, daria kalyniuk, these are the people who came there, and based on direct analytics from the military, they presented all of this together with valery zaluzhny. so he understands perfectly the whole system at the moment for nato countries and for great britain , including for germany and for france in view of the weapons they have provided, what they have that works, what does not work and what we need in view of what we have already experienced, so this is a man of all sides, and on the question of weapons, well, for them

now it is extremely valuable, believe me, this research topic is on the table of changes with... swarms, it became one of the main ones in the negotiations with congressmen, when we became not people who reach out and say help, you probably watched biden's speech that night, and we were able to see it this morning in kyiv, this an enchanting speech with very cool theses, belligerent, probably for a long time, biden spoke so long and belligerently exactly about ukraine, only about ukraine and about help. to ukraine, one of the topics was the argument that you give us weapons not only to protect ourselves, to support europe and your status as the number one democratic country, but that we will analyze it all, give it to us, and you will know that you don't lie well, you don't shoot well, so at the moment valery zaluzhnyi, the person who owns this

folder, is very well, and is sure that in each position we have specially hired experts who will be able to do it all... he worked with them, they will be able to voice it all too. positively, i really appreciate what happened. thank you, colleagues, we have to take a short break. we'll be back in the studio in a few minutes. there are discounts on helpex anticolt of 20% in pharmacies of travelers and savings. there are discounts on mebicar ic tablets, 10% in the pharmacies of plantain, vantaa. rose b: rose b. professional hair care at home . roguz b. buy plantain in pharmacies and save money. premium sponsor of the national team represents football is stronger together. every week

, maria gurska meets with the head of the committee on foreign affairs of the polish sejm, the representative of the polish government for the restoration of ukraine, pawel kowal. as always, we talk about the most important things that happened this week in poland, ukraine, and europe. what is being said about ukraine in the eu, how should we perceive the statements of european politicians and what will our accession to the eu look like? in the project close to politics, close to the world with maria gurska. every sunday at 15:30 with a repeat at 22:00. in collaboration with sestria au. events events that are happening right now and affect our lives. of course, the news feed reports on them. however, it was not enough to know what was happening. it is necessary to understand. antin borkovskii and invited experts soberly assess the events, analyze them, modeling our future. every saturday at 13:10 with a repeat at

22:00. studio zahid with anton borkovsky at espresso. i'm sorry.

this is the verdict program, my name is serhiy rudenko, we are working live, and at the same time we are conducting a survey , we are asking you about... about the following: do you or do you like the appointment of a volunteer ambassador to the uk do you approve of this appointment if you watch us on youtube it's pretty simple yes no or leave your comment below this video if you watch us on tv , pick up your smartphone or phone and vote if you approve of this decision, 0800 2011 381, not 0800 211 382, ​​all calls to these numbers are free. two of my colleagues are visiting me today, they are yanina sokolova and andriy yanitskyi. we are talking about zaluzhnyi, about sociology, about great britain, about

appointment. let's also talk about the opposition very briefly, because why did i mention the two opinion polls that came out on the eve of the announcement of zaluzhny's appointment as ambassador to great britain? the socis poll showed that zaluzhny defeated zelensky in the second round of the elections. according to the poll , there is another survey that came out today, it is a survey by kmis about political leadership in ukraine, about who is the leader of the ukrainian opposition, there are also quite interesting numbers here, why, why did these two sociologies catch my eye, because they just appeared in the interval between the announcement of zaluzhny as the new ambassador to great britain, so who do ukrainians consider to be the leaders of the ukrainian opposition, as evidenced by the kmis data: 26% consider poroshenko the leader of the opposition, 17% named the asylum, followed by people's deputies dmytro razunkov 7%, yulia tymoshenko - 5% ,

zaluzhny 3% and the former adviser to the president of the office of the president oleksiy aristovych 2%, and yuri boyko, by the way, the leader of the prohibition party opzsh also 2%, so here it is like the office of the president. i don't know, sociologists, let's say, clearly emphasized that zaluzhnyi was not in the opposition, was not the leader of the opposition, and well, it’s like 3% there , that is, compared to 67% there, 3% here, they look a little small, but the rating of trust in zaluzhny is a rating of people’s trust, it is not a rating of a political figure, because zaluzhny never talked about the fact that he wants to become a politician, although we understand that he is already a politician, he influences the politics in ukraine more than anyone else. he was influential when he was the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine, because he did not have this policy at all, not the opposition, not the government, if not skillful actions of valery zaluzhny yenin

, who do you consider the leader of the ukrainian opposition, is it even necessary to talk about the ukrainian opposition during the war, because when 17% supported serhiy prytula, that he is the leader of the ukrainian opposition, well, to be honest, with all due respect to serhiy dmytrovych , but to call him the leader of the ukrainian opposition. well, somehow it doesn't work out, poroshenko yes, he is perceived as the leader of the opposition, well, the sheltered leader of the opposition, the arrested leader of the opposition, what do these data show? read about the ignorance of our citizens, friends lists, follow, even if it is not broadcast, what is happening in the parliament, read the correct channels of communication, in particular, the tv channel. espresso, subscribe to yanin sokolova's youtube channel. in fact, jokes are jokes. serhiy prytula, in this list, is not, by the way, an absolutely oppositional

representative, despite his distant ties with the voice party and his claim to the mayoral post during the mayoral elections of kyiv, this whole story has somehow stalled, although, believe me, in the political circle... there are very active rumors that serhii prytula will spend with him political power, if the next elections are held, who will be there, there are even talks, and it is clear that it will be part of the military, therefore it will be one of the competitors of european solidarity, and perhaps serhiy will invite fragments of the voice party to him, which, unfortunately, due to conflicts, it will no longer be passable in the version in which it is now further, well, european solidarity... as far as i understand it, will not be united with prytula in the electoral list, therefore, on the stage now among the people who announced

theirs or announced their... their political ambitions, we are left with european solidarity and volunteer serhii prytulo, who has already applied for certain political positions in power structures. that is why, by the way, zaluzhnyi is so low, because people analyzed how they see the picture of the government, or how they see the future picture of the government among those who have decided on their political course. this, by the way, is a wake-up call for serhiy prytula, that people already. they understand that he will struggle, and i think, in the parliamentary and presidential elections. who is the leader of the opposition, serhiy? well, at the moment, i think it is obvious to everyone that the leader of the opposition is european solidarity, why? well, because the verkhovna rada currently has an opposition bloc, its redemptive bodies have not been killed like a hydra, unfortunately, by the system,

for me it’s wild, i... still don’t understand what boyko is doing in these ratings that we i just saw you, if you paid attention, there the south gave the most votes for him , which is under shelling, constantly 24/7 simply, well, you can see, west, center, south, here is boyko 4,6, and, east - two, the east has already understood something, and maybe more people just left, the south is still 4.6, why, well, probably because...

this is european solidarity, that is why they are currently the leaders of the opposition, regarding serhiy prytula, i expressed my opinion, i think that he will go to the elections, it is already visible from all signs when the elections will be held, but here is an interesting point, by the way, and i did not see these numbers, serhii, which you just showed, i saw only sausage , the shooting was just two days in a row, i didn't have time to explore this moment, and for me it's a surprise, because those... which i i have seen it said that people have a high level of trust in serhiy prytul as a volunteer and associate him with a volunteer, but regarding political activity, i have seen direct surveys of people on social networks and on the street, i have never seen such closed, anonymous numbers. then they did not associate their electoral preferences with him, as the leader of a future political force and a candidate for the presidential post, so 17%, you see, that's it

... i think the result is positive for serhiy and his like-minded people, and for me too editor suggests that zaluzhny was not on this list, but there was an option when those who answered could name their surname, so 3% - you are the one who named it, maybe if zaluzhny was put as the leader of the opposition, maybe he would be and in the first position, well, i mean in the survey, it’s just who, who was named by those who were surveyed, pay attention, pay attention, there is also aristovych, we can briefly comment, friends, his numbers, call your relatives and say that oleksiy aristovych continues for a reason his activities, because it is he, given the rhetoric, often pro-russian in my opinion, despite the fact that he is wanted there and there are criminal cases against him, all this has long been done by political manipulations, when we see that there is a frank k. ..

this war, and it is clear that someone who is persecuted by a dictator, in our opinion, is our friend in all these stories, but the rhetoric that is heard just brings me closer to the idea of ​​​​taking away a certain stratum of the electorate from opzh, and you you can see by the numbers, the south again supports him there, so i think that if the election in the coming years, you will see another political force. oleksiy aristovych will definitely do this given his ambitions and personal human qualities, knowledge of all processes and the ability to reach the audience , he has it, that is, from time to time, i get there, switching to watch a video with a certain goal, i come across some recommendations , which for some reason appear to me, then i see there that 35,000 or 50,000 people are sitting and

watching the artists... that this is part of the russian federation, because he says.