surprised when deputy lozovyi said that they worked 8.5 hours a month at the verkhovna rada of ukraine. i beg your pardon, but then what questions do we have for the congress of the united states? at least they go to work. i'm sorry. we are glad to include dmytro snighirov, a military expert, co-chairman of the public initiative prava dshava, in our conversation. mr. dmytro, congratulations, glory to ukraine. kudos to the heroes, congratulations, thank you for the invitation. salam aleikum. we are trying to outline now. the situation with the temporarily occupied crimea and an understanding of how it can develop in the future the situation in conditions where everything seems to be clear in the rhetoric of our partners. well, listen, even what the russians managed to eavesdrop on, among the highest-ranking military in germany, shows that there is an understanding that without the destruction of logistics in crimea, it is very difficult to decide anything at all regarding the russian. ukrainian war in favor of

our country. it pleases us that there is an understanding of the issues, there is an understanding of how to solve these problems. on the other hand, they are in no hurry to provide the appropriate tools. mr. dmitry, when we talk about logistics russians in general in crimea and the occupied south, what are the main features here and what should be paid attention to now. well, let's take turns, first, er, not the russians. eavesdropped on the germans, and the germans made a controlled leak of information so that the russians understood the possible consequences of a further escalation, including the use of taurissy to strike the critical infrastructure of the occupying forces in crimea, these are different things, and the russians finally understood that they were used , actually in the topic. another question, now on the logistics of occupation troops the armed forces of ukraine during the time of the commander, zaluzhnyi, respectively, conducted

operations to block the logistical component of the occupation army, according to nato standards, this is called the first stage of the cascading nature of planning de-occupation operations, i will explain what we are talking about, at the same time strikes were carried out on the infrastructure objects themselves , these are not only crimean cities, but also the corresponding hagar bridges, and parallel logistics were collapsing with possible. the use of large landing craft, you remember those successful attack forces defense of ukraine by large amphibious ships, five of them followed the known courses of the russian ship, which completely eliminated the possibility of creating the logistics of its parallel component, with the use of these large amphibious ships, i explain to the company, one large amphibious ship is capable of carrying out four raids in a day, given that a large number of them were concentrated there. accordingly, the russians calculated

that in the case of blocking the crimean bridge, logistics would be carried out by these ships, but it did not work out. why, by the way, the statements were made of the british government, that they hope that the ukrainian side, after the inexplicable resignation of zaluzhny, will continue the successful nature of the destruction of the logistical component of the occupation forces in crimea, and moreover, they expressed warnings about what kirsky could be, i i quote the language of the original, fixated on the land component of operations, while great britain, which is currently positioning itself as a world leader, demands from the ukrainian side, in fact, a different nature of actions, namely the deoccupation of crimea, a reduction in the presence of the russian empire in the black sea basin, they reflect the events that took place in the 19th century. and when, after the triumphant

victory of great britain, which led the coalition of forces, it all ended for the russian empire with the paris agreements, according to which the russian empire was not able to keep a navy and naval bases, this is what the western partners, great britain does not make statements, certain steps, and this is the transfer of stormshedal and, accordingly, scalti. casual britain is currently pressuring germany at the time of the so-called revolver exchange of means of destruction, i.e., britain hands over the stormchelde to germany and will receive tauruses, which it hands over to the armed forces. therefore , the further infrastructure of crimea, i emphasize once again, with such activity of the british side, it is in great doubt. britain is clearly currently implementing its construction strategy. of the new

military-political axis london, kyiv, ankara, the main task of which, i emphasize once again, is the de-occupation of crimea and the expulsion of russia from this black sea basin. but not only territorial waters and, accordingly , exclusively the economic zone of ukraine. mr. dmitry, i agree in all senses, but please tell me how this correlates with the fact that, in your opinion, mr. erdogan speaks very tolerantly about russia, offers his mediation in some negotiations, about which even, well, well what what there can be negotiations at the moment and none, well, there are definitely no conditions for this and no one can even formulate them, and in your opinion, in what way does turkey, if it is really interested in liberating the black sea from such insolent russian influence,

how can it support ukraine, if it has chosen such a middle role there, mr. ayder, let's remember again the world... "montreux doctrine, which prohibits the passage of naval vessels of belligerent countries into the waters of the black sea , you remember and the signed doctrine, according to which turkey gained control over the bosphorus and dardanelles, despite all the seemingly diplomatic statements of erdogan, the first thing he did was to close the bosphorus dardonelles to the passage of russian naval vessels federation in the black sea, and he did this at the beginning. the large-scale invasion of the russian army into ukraine , that is, what the russian federation currently has are the remains of the black sea fleet, this is the main contribution to turkey in the issue of deoccupation and crimea and, accordingly, the liberation of the black sea basin from the naval presence

of the russian federation. the russians understand very well that they are trapped, they cannot increase the presence of naval forces in the black sea basin, because the role of the turks. key in this questions, they block these initiatives and opportunities of the russian side, so a big thank you to turkey for this, by the way, this is its significant contribution to the deoccupation of crimea and, accordingly , the end of russia's naval dominance in the black sea? dmitry, i don't really understand this very old legislation, but let's assume that the russians want to withdraw their fleet, which... well, it's just melting before our eyes, withdraw, it's allowed, withdraw like this, and withdraw, they can, for example, there chamchira bay, where it currently ends, is occupied abkhazia, or novorossian, if they want to take it to syria , there are no questions, which most likely will happen

, that is, the reverse nature of the possible establishment of new naval vessels is impossible, this is exactly what deters the possibility of an escalation of tension in this basin, and plus ayder, let's talk about that not the last role of turkey, namely its technologies, is played by its own improvement of the tactical and technical characteristics of both naval drones and , accordingly, attack drones , we are talking about uavs that strike at military infrastructure of the russians in the occupied crimea, so i would not belittle the importance of erdogan in matters of the deoccupation of crimea... well, the turkish president now looks like a very modern person, because in the current world , in the current realities , it is a trend to say one thing and do something else instead , and here mr. erdoğan is actually playing in our favor,

i say, i am when it comes to some specific weapons, and you understand that somewhere the turkish analogue of haimars slipped through osintanalysts there on... on video, although publicly no statements about the transfer similar there were no weapons, when you understand what kind of cars the ukrainian marines travel on very often, that they are also of turkish production, you are not open to all secrets and military, this is all that is in the public space, maybe it is just not so noticed, alestyna, i still and i will add, i'm sorry, plus the hysteria of the russians regarding the construction of a plant for the production of bairaktars in ukraine. that friend erdoğan drove yatagan, as always, against my own will, this is a bright characteristic of how the russians themselves accept him. mr. dmytro, you have already noticed that the russians are aware of the similar fate of their logistics in crimea, but

we also cannot say that they are not doing anything about it, this is an alternative railway branch along the coast of the sea of ​​azov, as far as this project, at what stage it is in general now, the main intelligence department. and ook pivden emphasizes that this will be one of the priority goals, but as we understand, well, to damage the railway line, to what extent, how long it interrupts. repairing a railway track is not a very difficult task, it can be a preventive one, sorry, lord, let's explain, if we are talking about damage to the railway track, then as you rightly noted, it is three to a maximum of 5 days, depending on the degree of destruction, but if an attack is made on formation stations, so-called depots, respectively, or communication nodes, that is, dispatch centers. then the railway lays down literally in half an hour, that is , they hit the dispatching office, which

carries out the logistics of supplies by railway tracks and everything, and has no ability to control those flows, or for example, at the place of formation of railway rolling stock, that is, the so-called depots, 40-60 wagons piled up there, and heimer flew in, hello, and there may be more than one such case. and not two , but about the statements, well, probably the gur is not aware, but preventive strikes are already being carried out, it is said that the russians tried to build an actual, auto-, excuse me, railway overpass in the occupied territories, along it instantly a blow was delivered by the armed forces of ukraine, which actually put a pause on the further efforts of the russian occupiers to build something. mr. dmitry, there is another question, well, in my opinion, i

not such a military expert, compared to ms. christina, with ms. christina, i mean, why are you trolling me all the time, i'm surprised, i'm seriously surprised by how you monitor, i like it, i like how it burns , how it works, how the russians are exploding, so i wonder what our defense forces are doing, i'm just exploding in a good way myself. from the way you talk about it, and i want you to know what to clarify, ah, destroy the bridge, well , really, big missiles are needed there, big bombs, i don't know what there, but it's not only a question of damaging or destroying the span of this bridge there, the question is to prevent repair, to prevent the restoration of certain supply routes there, so an additional question when we say.. . that either we are told that we can destroy this bridge,

but the time has not yet come, or does this mean that we may be waiting for f-16s, which will not allow the russians to defend their facilities as they are now, and then already, when we will have some there, well , at least there is not that advantage, there really is a number of russians, large planes still despite all the beatings. that we will be able to compete and be able to prevent them from solving the issue of repair, restoration of some such actions there. ider, let's talk about the fact that the first steps are already being taken, we are talking about the destruction of the anti -missile and anti-aircraft defense systems that cover this bridge, you remember the successful attacks, respectively on the s-400, which were actually neutralized by the defense forces of ukraine. this is the main thing, as soon as we do not... neutralize the anti-aircraft missile defense forces, further strikes on the bridge will be exclusively

the technical side of the issue, what happened in the kherson region. let me remind you, where did the successful nature of deoccupation begin? first , they destroyed the anti-missile anti-aircraft defense system, and then took it under total fire control, respectively the bridge over the dnipro and the kakhovskaya dam, a gesture, and what it led to, a gesture of goodwill, the same is expected and... as soon as number one, we destroy the anti-missile systems defense and anti-aircraft, secondly, this is the next step - it is to strike directly at the bridge, but the aider and dear khrystyna, it is worth saying that you should not expect f16, we have our own development, the operational-tactical complex grim 2, better known as sabsan, the range of damage is 500 km, it is actually the same taurus, but of ukrainian production, and you know , when oh... news, it was still made with the money of the saudis in 2016, two

launchers, and at the moment, when i am informed that 300 million dollars are not enough for industrial production, i have a question: do you have enough 18 billion buy in highways? 18 billion is to agree slightly more than 300 million, which ends are necessary for the production of ukrainian taurus. and then we would not wait for anyone at the moment of the deoccupation of crimea, striking the crimean bridge, and, accordingly, retaliatory fire on the territory of the russian federation, because this would be a ukrainian development. no matter who we give political guarantees not to use weapons to strike for a strike on the territory of russia, we need to shout about it and raise alarms, we have our own developments, i have one more question, please, in fact, the day before the great half the offensive in the south, which was supposed to begin, we

already understand in the summer of 2023, the russians. resort to the attack and the undermining of kakhovskaya gas, some of the analysts believe that this was the decisive factor in the fact that we were, of course, constrained in our movements in the south, because when the water spilled, well, like that, we observed this week behind the attack of the russians on the bottom of the progress, does this mean that they are aware of... the plans of the defense forces of ukraine in the south and are trying to actually break them by detonating or hitting them once again. absolutely you need a correct picture, you know better than all military experts. it is said that the strikes on the dnieper aggression are not accidental, they are talking about the so-called

cascade detonation. dniprovska is far higher, and accordingly they are. count on the fact that at the moment of detonation of the dnipro dam , all the water will go further and wash away the entire hes cascade, which is located on the dnieper, a so-called water hammer, and this will lead to the flooding of large areas and make it impossible to carry out any counteroffensive operations of the armed forces forces of ukraine. that's it the main calculation, why not accidentally hit? note, on the dniprogest dam itself, not even on a gesture. gets-2, although there were strikes there, but the strikes on the dam are also trying to provoke an artificial man-made disaster. ugh. well, mr. dmytro, finally, perhaps you have any thoughts on what is happening with the commanders of the fleets of the russian federation? recently, we received confirmation that sokolov

was replaced by pinchuk, when we talk about the black sea fleet, shuigu himself came to sevastopol in order to pro... inspect the work of the black sea fleet russian federation, in addition, in general, the naval forces of the russian federation are now headed by a person who until 2019 headed the black sea fleet of the russian federation, that is, now she is responsible in general for all seas, as they say and oceans. i don't understand rearranging these beds, do you? well, you answered your question, you know, from rearranging the beds, the very tactics, er... the well-known establishment does not change, that's right, especially since the russians were expecting and already received pleasant surprises in the baltic sea, there is talk of flooding, respectively , captain lobanov, in fact, it’s like a civilian ship, but one thing, modern electronic warfare systems were placed on this civilian ship,

which actually jammed the signal of the plane of the minister of defense of great britain shapta, when he was returning from... poland and great britain and flew, respectively, over the waters of the baltic sea . well, now the russians have received sticks to salute in the baltic sea. therefore, this tactic of changes, beds, as i understand it, will continue in the future, because actually the defense forces of ukraine have declared that the black sea fleet, its remnants are the key goal of the ukrainian defense forces at the time of striking precisely the military infrastructure. mr. dmitry , well, i can’t help but ask this question, maybe it’s the last one, and it concerns not only crimea, in principle the whole war, the whole war, and now, just now, there is such a very powerful campaign of intimidation on kasapsky television, well, it’s calculated, for sure and on the ukrainians and on

the western partners, who are very reserved, as we know, and the campaign is about that. that russia has developed a product, a product, that is, these very heavy bombs, 300, that is, 3 tons lost equivalent, it seems, well, what a wonderful weapon, a miracle of a miracle weapon, how dangerous it is in reality, because we know that the equivalent of 500,000 kg was spent, it is very powerful. weapons, they greatly affect the situation at the front, especially since we do not have an antidote at the moment, where is the truth here, where is it, what degree should it be? are we actually prepared for this and do we have or will there be means that can withstand these types of superbombs?

come on, panera in turn, about what we need to worry about, not only us, but according to the russians, i will quote you, i was kicked out of bilhorodchyna, the russians kicked out their factory in the neighboring village of zamos instead of kozinka. business grayvoron, it’s an interesting situation, that’s right , the fab landed on the head of the russians themselves, instead of, say, destroying the battle formations of the russian volunteers, so the russians , let’s say this, the russian volume, the general public, i would advise to tighten up after all, because no it is excluded that the fap-300, it will fly the first head on their own stupid heads, less so, regarding the possibility of countering the armed forces of ukraine. we are again talking about strengthening the air defense systems, first of all we are talking about the medium and long range of action, that narrow, that dry spell should continue in the future, this is the first,

the second, respectively, we absolutely need the f16, which we are already tired of talking about, but for some reason the number of ukrainian pilots undergoing training courses is less than the number of planes that are going to be handed over to us, this is again not the responsibility of the ministry of defense of ukraine, what are we talking about? 45 aircraft are to be transferred, and the number there are half as many pilots who will serve them. even more questions about the number of technicians being trained, 50 technicians, this number is only enough to service five f-16 aircraft, it takes 8 to 14 technicians to service one aircraft. we are playing, or i do not understand, well, since the 22nd year of the issue of the transfer of f-16, we cannot find aviation tests. in sufficient quantity to service the at least 45 planes that will be handed over to us, and then we declare that the fabs are flying on the heads of ukrainian defenders,

but, but at the same time, the situation is not completely clear, again with the readiness of the ukrainian side to accept these f16s, when the western partners emphasize that, and where to transfer, the netherlands say, your infrastructure is not ready, the landing strips are absolutely not ready, sensitive landing gear , there must be a completely different take-off, for two years we have been talking about an insidious measure that is not ready to hand over to us fcisnat, while doing absolutely nothing, there is some logic in this, please explain to me, well maybe, i always hope that that we maybe we don't know something , that is, something is not in the public space, i thank you, mr. dmytro, for, as always, a professional analysis dmytro

snigerov, military expert, co-leader of the civil initiative the right thing was with us, we will take a short break, after which we will talk about very important , actually nuances, it seems to me that it is time to talk about the general legal principles of the functioning of the medzhalis of the crimean tatar people in the ukrainian legal field. be with us. greetings, this is svoboda live on radio svoboda. we have already approached the snake itself. the following shots may shock you. news from the scene. live drone attacks, kamikaze, political analytics. objectively and meaningfully. there is no political season. exclusive interviews, reports from the hottest points of the front. you draw your own conclusions. events, events that are happening right now and

affect our lives. of course, the news feed reports about them, but it is not enough to know what is happening, you need to understand it. antin borkovskyi and invited experts soberly assess the events, analyze them, simulating ours future. every saturday at 1:10 p.m. with a repeat on sunday at 10 a.m. studio event with anton borkovsky at espresso.

we are continuing our program together we are talking about crimea, this is a joint project of the tv channel and the atr tv channel, and as ms. khrystyna has already announced, we are now on direct contact with the first deputy chairman of the midjlis of the crimean tatar people, people's deputy of ukraine, akhtem chigos, akhtemba, salyam aleyka ,

greetings to aleyka. i congratulate you, glory to ukraine. well, the question, kudos to the heroes, the question we discussed, which khrystyna announced, is great simple, clear and clear. in what state is the improvement of the status of the mejlis of the crimean tatar people within the ukrainian legal and state system now. what we have now and in fact, what is going forward. in your opinion, what should be the status and place and role of the midjlis, just here and now and for the future, perhaps because the annexation of crimea will never leave the agenda. in this matter, after the adoption of the law on indigenous peoples, there is, let's say, cooperation with the cabinet of ministers, because it is within the competence of the cabinet of ministers. i had a special opinion, i believe that... the issue

of the interaction of the mejlis of the crimean tatar people is the sole competence of the president , because it was so, do you remember, yes, that representative body, which even in 1999, after long protest actions, kuchma was forced to sign such a decree, then he, uh, every president, the next, he continued it... but there is, there is such a state of affairs today that we are, as it were, interacting with the cabinet of ministers, and even here with the government , and here there are some developments, there is now the regulation of some nuances, legal,

actual questions, i think that everything will be fine, but it will be so inferior again, because it is necessary to resolve the issue according to the law on the status of the crimean tatar people, that is, yes, a representative body, it exists, so you know that it is also in the law on national communities, where there are such points as having representative bodies in order to interact with the state, that is, with the cabinet, with the government and to be more or less involved in international affairs there, that is, it is equally yes, and i believe that well , let's assume that this is the first... step,

but we are talking about the status of the indigenous people , the crimean tatar people, because this was already the rules of the game between the state and the crimean tatar people, this is a very influential part of the aspect you are talking about deoccupation of crimea, ugh, that is, we, we existed more than 91- th year, and more. the soviet union , let's put it this way, the consequences remained, and we had already created our representative bodies and forced any government to deal with the crimean tatar people through its representative bodies, but the interaction, that is , the rules of the game between the crimean tatar people, as such a complete nation, both political and

factual. and statehood on the territory.